7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
1/14
1
COAL AVAILABILITY & ITS UTILIZATION IN INDIA
What is coal? Where in India are coal and lignite available? Give the utilization pattern
for coal in India? List the coal conversion processes. Name the products obtained.
Coal is a product of decay of plant debris formed over geological time scale,under sedimentary sequences in a stratified form. It is classified into peat, lignite,
bituminous and anthracite -based on the degree of advance in coalification process.
Besides the organic content it contains mineral matter in its matrix. It is an Organic
rock.
Approximate chemical formula of coal is (C3H4)nIt is a hydrogen deficient solid hydrocarbon probably consisting of many interlocked
aromatic rings.
Reserves ofCoal in India were estimated by the Geological Survey of India in1998-99
approximately as 79 billion tonnes and Lignite reserves as 29.36 billion
tonnes.
States having coal deposits in India: Bihar (including Jharkhand), Bengal,
Madhya Pradesh (including Chattisgarh), Maharashtra, Andhra and Orissa.
LIGNITE: Reserve available in Tamil Nadu (1999) = 26 billion tones,
Rest of the reserves is in Rajasthan and Gujarat.
Coal production in India: 1983-84: 138 million tonnes
2000-01: 300 ,, ,,
Lignite production in : 1997-98:23 million tonnes
Utilization Pattern for coal in India:Power Generation,
To manufacture coke and in Steel mills,Cement manufacture, Textile and Railways
Smaller use: As household fuel
Coal Conversion Processes & products:
1. Coke Manufacture (Coke, Coaltar, Gas)
2. Coal Tar Distillation (aromatics,pitch)
3. Coal Gasification (Synthesisgas, Fuel gas)
4. Liquefaction of Coal(hydrocarbons) F.T.
5. Coal Hydrogenation (liquidhydrocarbons)
6. Coal combustion (Steam forpower)
Refer: S. SARCAR, FUELS AND COMBUSTION, 2 ED. 1990, CH 3 & CH 4
Ch 3: Coal as solid fuel, ranking, origin, composition, analysis, action of heat, oxidationand hydrogenation of coal.
Ch 4: Coal preparation, storage, carbonization, briquetting, gasification and liquefaction.
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
2/14
2
CHEMICALS FROM COKE OVEN DISTILLATE
When coal is heated in the absence of oxygen to a temperature of about 1000oC, coke
forms together with liquid and gaseous decomposition products. It is this distillate, also
called coal tar, which was a source of aromatics and many other chemicals for the early
chemical industry.
A typical coking operation produces 80% coke by weight, 12% coke oven gas, 3% tarand 1% light oil consisting of crude benzene, toluene and xylenes.
CHEMICALS: BENZENE, TOLUENE, XYLENES, INDENE, COUMARONE,
PHENOLS, CRESOLS, PYRIDINES, ANTHRACENE, PHENANTHRENE,
CARBAZOLE, and PITCH (60% 0F TAR).
FISCHER TROPSCH REACTION:
COAL SYNTHESIS GASMIXTURES OF ALKANES
(IRON, NICKEL, COBALT
CATALYST, 150-300oC)
This process is not economical now as a route from coal to hydrocarbons.COAL GASIFICATION PROCESSES:
Process Main characteristics
Texaco Pressurised entrained bed process involving the use of a watery slurry
of powdered coal. Less suited for lignite. Product gas low in methane,
and tar free. Low H2/CO ratio (~ 0.7).
Lurgi Pressurized moving bed process suitable for noncoking, granular coal.
Relatively high steam consumption. Product gas rich in methane,residual steam, and CO2 and contains tar, H2/CO ratio (~ 0.5)
Koppers-Totzek Atmospheric entrained bed process Powdered coal, high oxygen &
steam used. Suitable for Syn-gas for ammonia/methanol.Winkler Suitable for lignite, fluid bed process 800-1000 o C Atm. pressure.
High temp.Winkler
Pressurized stationary fluid bed process for lignite. Higher gasificationrates, better conversion than Winkler.
British Gas-
Lurgi slagging
gasifier
Pressurized moving bed process- non-coking granular coal based. Less
steam consumption, smaller reaction volumes and pure product gas
than via Lurgi process.
Shell Pressurized entrained bedDry coal powder, lignite suitable. High
thermal efficiency, pure product gas like that of Koppers- Totzek
COAL HYDROGENATION:
In the F-T process, the hydrogen required to convert coal to aliphatic hydrocarbons is
ultimately derived from water. In Bergius process, coal, lignite or coal tar were
hydrogenated over an iron catalyst at 450o
C and 700 bar. Less drastic conditions weresufficient for coal hydrogenation when a solvent tetralin was used to hydrogenate the coal
in a liquid- solid phase process at about 200o
C and 65 bar.
Reference: Drydens OUTLINE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 3rd
Edition,1997, Ch.Coal & Coal Chemicals, pp 370-378.
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
3/14
3
COAL UTILIZATION
What is coal and where in India is it available? Give the utilization pattern for coal in
India? List the coal conversion processes. Name the products obtained.
Approximate chemical formula of coal is (C3H4)nIt is a hydrogen deficient solid hydrocarbon probably consisting of many interlockedaromatic rings.
Reserves ofCoal in India were estimated by the Geological Survey of India in1998-
99 approximately as 79 billion tonnesandLignitereserves as 29.36
billion tonnes.
States having coal deposits in India: Bihar (including Jharkhand), Bengal,
Madhya Pradesh (including Chattisgarh), Maharashtra, Andhra and Orissa.
Lignite: Reserve available in Tamil Nadu (1999) = 26 billion tones,
Rest of the reserves is in Rajasthan and Gujarat.
Coal production in India: 1983-84: 138 million tonnes
2000-01: 300 ,, ,,Lignite production in : 1997-98:23 million tonnes
Utilization Pattern for coal in India:Power Generation,
To manufacture coke and in Steel mills,
Cement manufacture and RailwaysSmaller use: As household fuel
Coal Conversion Processes & products:
1. Coke Manufacture (Coke, Coal tar, Gas) 2. Coal Tar Distillation (aromatics, pitch)
3. Coal Gasification (Synthesis gas, Fuel gas) 4. Liquefaction of Coal (hydrocarbons)
5. Coal Hydrogenation (liquid hydrocarbons) 6. Coal combustion (Steam for power)
Refer: S. SARCAR, FUELS AND COMBUSTION, 2 ED. 1990, CH 3 & CH 4
Ch 3: Coal as solid fuel, ranking, origin, composition, analysis, action of heat,oxidation and hydrogenation of coal.
Ch 4: Coal preparation, storage, carbonization, briquetting, gasification andliquefaction.
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
4/14
4
(Images 4 and 5)
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.html7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
5/14
5
(Image 6)
(Image 7)
(Image 8 and 9)Explosives used inmining
(Image 10)Workers using a Continuous Miner
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.html7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
6/14
6
(Image 11)(Image 12)Chris5of5.html
Workers over looking a cutting machine as it loosens coal from a "long wall"
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.html7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
7/14
7
Technologies for Energy Conversion
There are many different ways of mining, but they are separated into two categories,
surface mining and underground mining. Surface mining is used when the coal is located
close to the surface or on hillsides.
Surface Mining
This method pretty much involves removing the earth and rock that are covering the coal
with heavy earth-moving equipment, removing the coal then replacing the excavated soiland reestablishing vegetation and plants.(webpage 6) The excavation usually on a
stepped or benched, side slopes and can reach depths as low as 1500 ft. The advantages
of surface mining is that it recovers 90% of the coal to be mined. (Book 2)
Underground Mining(Webpage 4)
This method is used to extract coal that lies deep beneath the Earth's surface. The coal isreached by drilling two openings into the coal bed to transport workers and equipment
and to send coal to the surface. (images at top of page).
Underground mining is broken up to 3 main methods:
Conventional Mining: The older practice of using explosives to break up a coal seam
Continuous Mining: Uses a huge machine with a large rotating steel drum equipped withtungsten carbide teeth, and it scrapes coal from a coal seam at high speeds.
Long wall Mining: Uses a cutting machine with a large rotating steel drum that isdragged back and forth across a long wall or a seam of coal. The loosened coal then falls
onto a conveyer belt and is taken out of the mine to the surface.
Uses of Coal(webpage 7)
According to the World Coal Institute, coal has many uses such as transportation, steel
industry, domestic and agriculture uses and power generation. Most of the coal is being
used for generating electricity.
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/references.html7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
8/14
8
1. Power Generation 62%
2. Domestic 5%
3. Steel Industry 16%
4.Non-Metallic Industry,
Cement5%
5. Other 2%
6.Commerce, public services,
transportation10%
Heavy Users of Coal around the World(1998)
Poland 86%
South
Africa90%
Australia 86%
China 81%
India 75%
CzechRepublic
74%
Greece 70%
Denmark 59%
USA 56%
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
9/14
9
Steel Production(Website 8)
Around 67% of the steel that is produced world wide is made in a blast furnace where
coke is used. Iron occurs in nature in chemical compounds, ores, Fe2O3, hematite. Cokeis used to supply enough carbon as a reducing agent for the smelting of iron ore. Coal
was first used in the 17th century because of over timbering. Also, iron can dissolve andreact with H2S that is given off from coal. (Class notes)
Gasification(Class notes)
Gases are easier to handle, clean to burn and can be implemented into Natural Gas
Coal Gas: a good flue gas from the volatile matter of heated coal (H2, CH4).
Pros: Burns Clean, Cons: Low Yields, Produces Tars/Pollutants
Producer Gas: Low calorific fuel gas from incomplete coal combustion (CO)
Pros: Easy to produce, all coal goes to gaseous products and good for industrialprocesses
Water Gas: formed from reacting coal with water at high temperature yielding a gas
stream of H and CO
Pros: high calorific value Cons: Endothermic, takes a lot of energy
http://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.htmlhttp://www.personal.psu.edu/users/c/k/cky107/Chris5of5.html7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
10/14
10
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC)
Electric Power Generation
Coal based electric power generation (i.e., direct combustion of coal
in stoker fired and pulverised coal fired boilers) has historically been
the backbone of the electric utility industry and this technology is well
proven. But the technology has reached a plateau of maximum
efficiency with only marginal potential for further improvements due to
technical limitations.
In addition to this limitation on efficiencies, tightening of
environmental control requirements have resulted in substantial
increase in both capital and operating costs to reduce emissions from
conventional coalfired power plants and also in lowering plant
efficiency and reliability, on the otherhand coal gasification
technology has emerged as the most environmentally benign and
competitive way of coal utilisation. Thus it would be of enormous
benefit to the electric utility industry to find some practical means for
combining the high efficiency of combined cycle system with the
clean coal gasification-process for utilising coal which is a low cost
and abundantly available fossil fuel. This has led to the development
of IGCC Power system.IGCC is the technology designed to meet the higher efficiency and
stringent environmental regulations required in the 21st century.
IGCC systems have the potential to compete economically with
conventional coalfired steam plants and have lowest possible level of
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
11/14
11
pollution. As environmental control requirements increase, the
economic advantages of IGCC would correspondingly increase.
Similarly with further developments in coal gasification and gas
turbine technologies taking place, the economic and performance
benefits of IGCC would increase significantly. The efficiency of IGCC
which is now around 40-45% is likely to increase to 55-60%. The
capital cost of large and mature technology IGCC plants and PC
plants with FGD are projected to be nearly same. IGCC is the most
economical system when compared to the conventional pulverised
coal fired plant for removal of sulfur and nitrogen. With high sulfur
coals the efficiency difference between the two plants is higher since
the auxiliary power consumption for the sulfur removal is up to 3% in
the flue gas desulfurisation (FGD) unit of coalfired plant and
negligible in the IGCC plant.
IGCC plants require less water than coal fired plant as approximately
60% of power is generated from gas turbine. IGCC plants also
require less land. IGCC systems are highly modular which enable
phased construction and higher plants availability up to 85% or about
7400 hours per year of plant operation [7] and economy at smaller
capacities of the order of 250 MW. Introduction of IGCC technology to
utilities can create new business opportunities in the co-production of
electricity with chemicals, liquid fuels etc.
As the global demand for coal increases, worldwide carbon emissions
will also increase. It is estimated that if all power producers were to
use the most efficient clean coal technologies, IGCC being one of
them, global carbon dioxide emissions could be cut by more than
half, compared with the levels that would be emitted by the existing
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
12/14
12
power plant technologies, i.e. pulverised coalfired [8].
The expert group on IGCC technology appointed by Govt. of India
has prepared a Techno-Economic Feasibility Report (TEFR) in the
year 1991 comparing the operational performance and economics of
IGCC and PC based power generation for a 600 MW capacity plant
with 35% ash coal. According to the results of the study given in
Table 3 IGCC is more efficient, pollution is very less and capital and
generation costs are comparable with PC plant [7].
IGCC technology is now moving from drawing board to commercial
scale. A 250 MW IGCC plant of Tampa Electric Co. USA has
successfully completed one year of commercial operation. The
wabash project in USA of 262 MW IGCC plant began its commercial
operation in November 1995. Sierra pacific pinion pine IGCC project,
USA of 107 MW capacity is undergoing operation trials. A 250 MW
IGCC plant at Buggenum, Netherlands has entered its final
demonstration year. The capital cost of IGCC plant now is around
$2000/kW which is likely to come down to $1500/kW. The global
market for IGCC is expected to be 41 GW by 2004 [9].
3.4 Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell
Fuel cell is the most efficient and the least polluting system of power
generation. Out of the 3 fuel cell systems based on the type of
electrolyte used i.e. Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell (PAFC) Molten
Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), the
latter two are suitable to utilise coal gas which resulted in the
development of Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell (IGFC) System.
PAFC is nearly commercial and the other two (MCFC and SOFC) are
at development stage.
7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
13/14
13
IGFC can attain efficiencies up to 60% and are cool enough to
prevent NOx formation. Sulfur and particulate present in the coal are
removed during the gasification process before feeding the fuel gas
to the fuel cell. A comparison between the emissions of a coalfired
conventional power plant and IGFC system is given in the table 4
which shows that fuel cell generates extremely clean power [10].
There are two major challenges with respect to commercialisation of
fuel cell: initial cost and reliable life. The two problems have to be
solved to improve the economics of fuel cell.
3.5 Other Technologies
In addition to IGCC, two other relevant technologies for power
generation are : Pressurised Fluidised Bed Combustion (PFBC) and
High Concentration Coal Water Slurry (HCCWS). The PFBC
technology is demonstrated in 80-100 MW scale abroad. The PFBC
is dependant on hot gas cleaning for the removal of particulate from
the flue gases or on a heavy duty gas turbine which can tolerate
particulate matter in the flue gases. Both hot gas cleanup and heavy
duty gas turbine are under development. IGCC also incorporates a
hot gas cleanup system which increases the overall efficiency, but
wet scrubbing by water can be employed in place of hot gas cleanup
with some loss in efficiency. Thus PFBC compared to IGCC is
constrained by availability of hot gas cleanup technology. Another
major disadvantage with PFBC is that more power is generated from
steam turbine which is less efficient compared to gas turbine.
Whereas in IGCC, more power is generated from the gas turbine and
http://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/default/tech_papers/17th_congress/2_3_28.asp#tophttp://www.worldenergy.org/wec-geis/publications/default/tech_papers/17th_congress/2_3_28.asp#top7/29/2019 Coal Mining Conversion Use
14/14
14
hence is more efficient. Continuous developments are taking place in
the gas turbine technology which could result in higher efficiencies in
IGCC beyond 50%. Such improvements in the steam turbine are
limited.
HCCWS consisting of 70% solids and 30% water is used for power
generation either through combustion or gasification route. High ash
content in the coal thermally penalises the conversion processes of
coal slurry resulting in lower and uneconomical efficiencies. Therefore
the coals have to be necessarily washed to bring down the ash
content to around 15% to improve the efficiency and economics. But
the cost of preparation of slurry itself depends upon the techno-
economics of washing which are at present unattractive for high ash
coals. Thus application of HCCWS technology to high ash coal
mainly depends on technoeconomics of washing the coal.