Climate Change
Scientific evidence, regulatory options, & global governance
US Global Change Research Program11 January 2013
• Draft Climate Assessment Report:• Climate change is no longer a future threat. • It is happening now. • National Climate Assessment Development
Advisory Committee • 13 US government departments and agencies• Executive Office of POTUS oversees
Science of climate change
• It is global in it’s origin and effects• The effect is NOT marginal – potential impacts
are extremely large and lethal• The risk and uncertainty associated are
extremely large – the variance of the effect dominates the average effect
• The impact is to be felt over the long run (hundreds if not thousands of years)
Historic CO2 Concentrations
• Antarctic ice cores going back 800,000 years – 180 ppm (during the colder ice ages) to – 280 ppm (during the warmer interglacial periods)
• Last 10,000 years: 280 ppm • Lndustrial revolution about 1750: began rising• Mauna Loa 1958: 315 ppm• Mauna Loa 2013: 400 ppm• IPCC formula: 600 (800) ppm = average change of 3.3
C (4.5 C) & likely range 1.1 C (3 C ) to 5 C (6.8)
Temperature Anomaly 1880-2011 (January)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Temperature Anomaly 1880-2011 (July)
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Relationship between CO2 and temperature is not linear
100200
300400
500600
700800
9001000
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
LOVECLIMPolynomial (LOVECLIM)MIT-IGSM2.3Polynomial (MIT-IGSM2.3)Bern2.5CCPolynomial (Bern2.5CC)
Slow moving disaster
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLlUgilKqms
There is uncertainty (follow CO2 lines from right to gauge temp. probability)
2C 3C 4C 5C 6C 7C
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
450500
550650
750
Temperature-CO2-Probability
450
500
550
650
750
Temperature Rise
Probability
CO2 Concentration
Global Population: Mind the gap
Who will be in the developed country category?
• In the past 100 years, only a small number of countries have moved from developing to developed categories.
• This will change by 2100.• Two billion people countries will join the club:
China and India• And another group with 100+ million will be
there too: Mexico and Brazil
Temperature and human impact
Policy issues
• Simplistic division of countries into developed & developing.– Categorize according to mitigation & adaptation
capacity & vulnerability.• Analyze IPRs by technology type
– Plant varieties– Clean energy technology
• Don’t subsidize fossil fuel– Do subsidize clean energy– Ensure WTO rules allow
Policy responses to climate change
• Mitigation: reduce GHG emissions to limit the degree of climate change that will occur.
• Adaptation: to respond to the effects of climate change that has occurred or will occur.
• Both require technology diffusion. • Key issue: legal implications of unilateral
responses to multilateral negotiation failure.
Multilateral negotiation failureCauses
– Consensus-based decision-making (WTO, UNFCC)– ‘Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed’
(WTO) – Rise of major emerging economies– Financial crisis in developed countries– North-South, North-North and South-South
divides– (Disguised) protectionism, regulatory capture
Multilateral negotiation failureConsequences
• WTO consequences– Unilateral, bilateral or plurilateral responses– Regional Trade Agreements
• UNFCCC/Kyoto consequences– Unilateral, bilateral or plurilateral responses– Bilateral and Regional Agreements
• Catalysts for action– weather events (hurricanes, fires, droughts, floods)– unilateral measures
Jurisdictional categories of policy responses
• Scope of measures– subnational (NYC zoning; California cap-and-trade)– national (Australia carbon tax)– international (Kyoto)
• Method of enacting measures– unilateral (no international agreement)– bilateral (EU-Australia)– Regional (EU emissions trading; aviation directive)– Multilateral (UNFCCC; WTO)
Mitigation & Adaptation
• Address different, interrelated risks.• Mitigation increases chances of successful adaptation.• Mitigation: local costs, global (long-term) benefits. • Adaptation: local costs and (short and medium-term)
benefits.• Adaptation capacity & vulnerability differ, so costs &
benefits do too.• Asymmetrical incentives to take mitigation and
adaptation measures.• But can’t ignore global nature of the problem.
Global governance
• Means risk management via international processes, institutions and legal regimes.
• Scientists identify and assess risks. • Leaders find ways to mitigate and adapt. • Mitigation and adaptation have financial and economic
implications. • And require coordination of legal regulation, including
international environmental law and international economic law.
• Legal regulation implies international negotiation, avoiding regulatory capture and coordination between global institutions.
Technology Transfer for Mitigation and Adaptation
• IPR issues vary with technology– Some cite debate over patents and medicine
• Mitigation: clean energy technology– IPRs less likely to reduce access by increasing cost– Competing firms & technologies reduce costs– US CVDs on solar panels = IPRs not sufficient entry barrier
• Adaptation: biotechnology barriers to access– GM plants have few substitutes– 6 MNCs patented 77% of “climate ready crop genes” – Developing countries more vulnerable to impacts of climate change
on agriculture and subsistence farmers– Terminator genes prevent replanting saved seed
IPRs, tech transfer & North-South divide
• In climate change negotiations: – developing countries seek $ for technology or relaxation of IPRs to
lower tech cost – developed countries defend IPRs
• Why?– concentration of technologies and IPRs in developed countries – prediction of disproportionate impacts of climate change on developing
countries • BUT role of IPRs in tech transfer will be different in richer,
scientifically-advanced developing nations than in poorer, less scientifically-advanced nations.– China: solar power– Brazil: biodiesels
Real clean energy issues are…
• Redirect fossil fuel subsidies to clean energy. – Reform WTO law to allow enviro subsidies.
• Disseminate clean energy tech by removing barriers to: – trade in clean energy technologies (CVDs, ADDs &
TRIMS)– foreign investment (BITs, GATS)– trade in services (GATS)
• Use cap-and-trade to create tech demand.– SO2 example (below)
Is cap-and-trade just hype or hope?
• Design based on US SO2 market model.• US set up emission rules for the US Acid Rain
Program in Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act.• Energy producers then had incentive to adopt
cleaner technology. • Led to dramatic reduction of acid rain in
certain region of the United States. • How dramatic?
1989-1991 2004-2007
Current, future carbon markets30
0
237
232
206
174
171
170
130
94 86 71 60 56 45 37 33 31 30 29 22 22 19 11 9 4 3
540
150
496
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
CC
X
Ger
man
y
Can
ada
Pol
and
Italy
Uni
ted
Kin
gdom
Aus
tral
ia
Spa
in
US
NE
Sta
tes
(RG
GI)
Fra
nce
Cal
iforn
ia
Cze
ch R
epub
lic
The
Net
herla
nds
Gre
ece
Bel
gium
New
Sou
th W
ales
Fin
land
Por
tuga
l
Aus
tria
Den
mar
k
Slo
vaki
a
Hun
gary
Sw
eden
Irel
and
Est
onia
Lith
uani
a
Slo
veni
a
Latv
ia
Luxe
mbo
rg
Hu
nd
red
Mill
ion
Met
ric
ton
s C
O2
Live Market
Market in development
Under discussion
China 2013 (#1 GHG emitter)
• Had pledged to cut emissions intensity (Co2 emissions per economic unit) 45 % by 2020.
• National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) proposed absolute caps to separate emissions growth from economic growth.
• Planned peak in overall emissions in 2025.• First pilot carbon-trading program Shenzhen: 638
companies (38% of city's total emissions).• Shenzhen is one of seven pilot carbon-trading
programs set for 2013.
International economic law & climate change regime
• No inherent inconsistency BUT analysis is complex.• Right to regulate is constrained by international legal
obligations: UNFCCC, WTO (GATT, TBT, TRIMS, SCM, AoA), RTAs, BITs, IPRs (TRIPS, UPOV).
• Scope of right to regulate requires interpretation of international treaties.
• Must interpret international treaties in light of each other’s content, to avoid conflicting interpretations.
• Complexity of this legal analysis is additional obstacle to effective climate change regulation.
• Relevant international economic law treaties not drafted with climate change in mind.