CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Cal TAC Assessment Symposium
October 21, 2010
A Look into the Future: California’s Summative Assessment
System
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
2
Presentation Topics
• Setting the Context: – California’s process for test development
• California – what’s ahead: – Common core standards
– Common assessments
• California’s Readiness for Computerized Testing
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
3
CA Test Development • Legislation authorizing test
development • Budget authority and sufficient funding • Primarily designed as accountability
measure • Contract for development • Annual cost
– 76 million for development and administration
– 25 million for apportionment
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
4
Responsibilities of Test Developers
• Validity – accuracy for intended purpose
• Reliability – consistency • Fairness – free from bias and
equal treatment
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
5
Current Types of Test Items and Administration
• Paper & Pencil • Multiple-Choice • Constructed Response/
Performance – Essays
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
6
The Common Core State Standards Initiative
• In 2009, the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) committed to developing a set of standards that would help prepare students for success in college and career.
• In September 2009, College and Career Readiness standards were released.
• A voluntary state-led effort coordinated by the CCSSO and NGA
• Included parents, educators, content experts, researchers, national organizations and community groups from 48 states, 2 territories and the District of Columbia
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
7
The Common Core State Standards
• Rigorous, research-based standards for English-language arts and mathematics for grades K-12
• Designed to prepare the nation’s students with the knowledge and skills needed for success in college and the workforce
• Internationally benchmarked to ensure that students will be globally competitive
• A clear and consistent educational framework • A collaborative effort that builds on the best of
current state standards
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
8
California and the Common Core State Standards
• Senate Bill 1 from the Fifth Extraordinary Session (SB X5 1): – established an Academic Content
Standards Commission (ACSC) to develop standards in mathematics and English–language arts
– stated that 85 percent of the standards were to consist of the CCSS with up to 15 percent additional material
– directed the State Board of Education (SBE) to adopt or reject recommendations of the ACSC
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
9
The Academic Content Standards Commission
• Under the direction of the Sacramento Country Office of Education, the ACSC convened during the summer of 2010 to evaluate the CCSS for rigor and alignment to California standards.
• Appointed members (21) by the Governor (11), Speaker (5), and Senate Pro Tem (5).
• Words, phrases, and select California standards were inserted in their entirety to maintain California’s high expectations for students.
• On July 15, 2010, the commission recommended that the SBE adopt the CCSS as amended.
• The SBE voted unanimously to adopt the recommendations of the ACSC on August 2, 2010.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
10
Grade 8 Mathematics
• The K-7 CCSS prepare students for Algebra 1 in grade 8.
• However, the CCSS also include a set of challenging grade 8 standards to prepare students for success in higher math, including Algebra 1.
• Assessment will be key
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
11
Next Steps
• Frameworks and instructional materials • Assessments • Professional development
The California Department of Education is currently working on implementation plans for the common core and will bring this plan initially to the SBE in November, 2010.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
12
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA)
Assessment Requirements • Reading/language arts in grades 3–8 and at
least once in grades 10–12
• Mathematics in grades 3–8 and at least once in grades 10–12
• Science at least once during each of three specified grade spans: grades 3–5, 6–9, and 10–12
• Race to the Top Assessment Program Competition
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
13
Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and
Careers • Consortium of 26 states
– California has signed on as a participating state
– Governor, State Superintendent of Public Instruction and State Board of Education President required to sign MOU
• Florida is fiscal agent
• ACHIEVE is Project Manager
• Assess grades 3 through 8 and once in grades 10-12
• Possible high school end-of-course
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
14
PARCC Awarded Race to the Top Assessment
Funds
• On September 2, 2010, PARCC awarded 169.9 million
• An additional 15.9 million awarded for the purpose to help all participating states with the transition to common core and common assessments
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
15
PARCC States
Governing • Arizona • Arkansas • District of Columbia • Florida • Illinois • Indiana • Louisiana • Maryland • Massachusetts • New York • Rhode Island • Tennessee
Participating • Alabama • California • Colorado • Delaware • Georgia • Kentucky • Mississippi • New Hampshire • New Jersey • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Pennsylvania • South Carolina
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
16
PARCC Theory of Action • More Meaningful Standards: The Partnership’s assessment
system will be anchored in the Common Core State Standards which are consistent across states, clear to the public, and provide an on-ramp to college and careers.
• Higher Quality Tests: PARCC assessments will include sophisticated items and performance tasks to measure critical thinking, strategic problem solving, research and writing.
• Through-Course Testing: Students will take parts of the assessment at key times during the school year, closer to when they learn the material.
• Maximize Technology: PARCC assessments in most grades will be computer based.
• Cross-State Comparability: States in PARCC will adopt common assessments and common performance standards.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
17
PARCC Intended Purposes
• Report achievement results based on a clear definition of college and career readiness, so students will know if they are on track early enough to make adjustments.
• Compare results against a common high standard because readiness shouldn’t differ across states or income levels.
• Help make accountability policies better drivers of improvement by basing them on more sophisticated and meaningful assessments.
• Promote good instruction by providing teachers useful, meaningful and timely information, which will help them adjust instruction, individualize interventions, and fine-tune lessons throughout the school year.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
18
PARCC Accountability Outcomes
• To support multiple levels and forms of accountability including: – Decisions about promotion and graduation for
individual students – Teacher and leader evaluations – School accountability determinations – Determinations of principal and teacher professional
development and support needs – Teaching, learning, and program improvement
• To assess all students, including English learners and students with disabilities.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
19
PARCC Key Actions
• By Spring 2011 adopt: – common assessment administration procedures
– a common set of item release policies
– a test security policy
– a common definition of "English learner" and common policies and procedures for student participation and accommodations for English learners
• By December 31, 2011 – each consortium state adopt a common set of
college-and career-ready standards
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
20
PARCC Summative Assessments
• Overall assessment system will include a mix of constructed response items, performance tasks, and computer-enhanced, computer-scored items
ELA/literacy
• 3 “through-course” components
– administered after 25%, 50%, and 75% of instruction • Speaking & listening components
– administered after 75% of instruction (not part of summative score)
• End-of-year component – administered after 90% of instruction
Mathematics • 3 “through-course” components
– administered after 25%, 50%, and 75% of instruction • End-of-year component
– administered after 90% of instruction
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
21
Assessment Component Advantages
• Through-course approach will focus instruction throughout the year and nearer to the assessment
• The sum of the components address the full range of the common core
• Allows for multiple measures across the full range of performance
• Allows for in-depth assessment of writing and mathematics problem-solving
• Both through-course and end-of-year components provide data that teachers can use to adjust instruction
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
22
PARCC Timeline
Sept. 2011
Development phase begins
Sept. 2012
First year field tes6ng and
related research and data collec6on begins
Sept. 2013
Second year field tes6ng begins and
related research and data collec6on con6nues
Sept. 2014
Full administra6on
of PARCC assessments
begins
Oct. 2010
Launch and design phase
begins
Summer 2015
Set achievement
levels, including
college-‐ready performance
levels
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
23
California Readiness for Computer-Based Testing
• California’s assessment vendor conducted a survey and in-person site visits
• Conclusions: – Feasible but expensive – Need multi-year rollout – District/school environment difficult for
administering fair, standard & secure test – Budget commitment
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
24
Readiness – cont.
• Education Week – CA ranked lowest quintile in overall
technology leadership among states – Average of 3.8 students to one
computer in U.S. – Average of 5 students to one
computer in CA
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction
25
Resources • Full text of the Common Core California
Standards: http://www.scoe.net/castandards/index.html (Outside Source)
• Information about the Common Core: http://www.corestandards.org/ (Outside Source)
• PARCC proposal: http://www.fldoe.org/parcc/ (Outside Source)