7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 1/63
PROFITABILITY AND THE IMPACT OF COMPLEXITY ON TECHNICAL TRADING
SYSTEMS IN THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET
Brian Kenneth Edward Leip*
[May 2011]
* Brian Leip is an undergraduate student in the College of Business Administration HonorsProgram at California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840. This manuscript serves to fulfillhis Honors Thesis requirement. Address correspondence to Brian Leip: [email protected].
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 2/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I must begin by offering my deepest gratitude towards Dr. Pamela Miles Homer, Director of
the CSULB and my thesis sponsor, without whom this thesis would likely not have been
completed. Her deep understanding of the academic thesis process coupled with her persistence
and constant encouragement was vital in seeing this paper through to completion. I would also
like to thank Dr. Peter Ammermann for supporting me in the CSULB Student Research
Competition as well as giving a final review of this paper. Dr. Sam Min also deserves my
genuine thanks for the time he spent guiding the CBA Honors Program while Dr. Homer was on
sabbatical.
I conclude with a heartfelt thanks to my friends, parents, siblings, and girlfriend who
patiently supported me throughout this most challenging endeavor. Completing my thesis
demanded a significant portion of my time. Their kind words, understanding, and encouragement
made the sacrifices easier to bear and the joy of completing the thesis that much greater.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 3/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 1
PROFITABILITY AND THE IMPACT OF COMPLEXITY ON TECHNICAL TRADING
SYSTEMS IN THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKET
ABSTRACT
This study examines the profitability of 63 publicly available automated technical trading
strategies across six complexity levels over a 35-year period (1/1/1975 to 6/30/2010). The
strategies are tested on the spot foreign exchange market where technical analysis usage is most
prevalent. Prior studies on technical analysis in the foreign exchange market argue that simple
technical trading systems generate excess profits that are eroded over time to near zero, yet more
complex technical trading systems are profitable and are able to retain profitability over time.
However, to my knowledge, the impact of complexity has not been tested empirically.
Complexity is here quantified (operationalized) and its impact on risk-adjusted excess profits is
tested.
In addition, the scope of technical trading systems studied in the past is limited by the
number of trading systems tested and the number of foreign currencies used. This study attempts
to expand on past findings by using genetic optimization techniques on the sampled 63 strategies
on seven major currency pairs for a total of 441 optimization cases. Each optimization case had
an average of 69,030 tests, resulting in 30,442,069 total tests.
Findings show that although the majority of trading systems are profitable, a substantial
portion of those profits can be explained as compensation for the bearing of risk, consistent with
the efficient market hypothesis. However, when examining the effect of complexity, there is a
clear link between complexity and risk-adjusted excess profits. This implies that technical
trading system excess profits are the result of skill, rather than luck, in opposition to the efficient
market perspective.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 4/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 2
I. INTRODUCTION
The past history of stock prices cannot be used to predict the future in any
meaningful way. Technical strategies are usually amusing, often comforting, butof no real value.
This quote in a bestselling finance book (over 1.5 million copies sold as of January 10, 2011)
written by Princeton University economics professor and a leading proponent of the efficient
market hypothesis, Burton Malkiel (2011, p. 161), is one notable motivation for this study.
Contrary to Malkiel’s argument, empirical evidence shows that 59 percent of modern academic
studies on technical analysis yielded positive results versus 21 percent negative and 20 percent
mixed (Park and Irwin 2007). Yet despite this evidence, vocal critics like the above have resulted
in a negative stigma against the practice of technical analysis amongst certain circles.
Technical analysis can be defined as "the study of market action, primarily through the use of
charts, for the purpose of forecasting future price trends" (Murphy 1999). With the majority of
studies favoring the effectiveness of technical analysis, a layperson would likely conclude that
academics would be the ones staunchly praising technical analysis with practitioners being
behind the curve, but evidence suggests otherwise (Menkhoff and Taylor 2007). The bias against
technical analysis is also occasionally found in popular finance textbooks such as Strong (2009).
Academia’s skepticism of technical analysis is largely due to its conflict with the efficient
market hypothesis (Fama 1970) that is the foundation of modern finance theory. The efficient
market hypothesis — even in its weakest form — states that technical analysis should be
ineffective. Practitioners, on the other hand, used technical analysis prior to the emergence of the
efficient market hypothesis in the 1970’s, and have continued its use, relatively unmoved by
critics such as Malkiel and Fama (Cheung and Chinn 2001).
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 5/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 3
This divide between ―the classroom‖ and ―the street‖ has created a knowledge and perception
gap and begs the question, if not in the classroom, then where are future practitioners to learn
proper technical analysis techniques? This study seeks to bridge this gap via an expansive
exploration of technical analysis in the foreign exchange (forex) market.
Moving beyond the broad academic perception of technical analysis, many studies on
technical analysis in the forex market test a limited number of technical trading systems,
currencies, and time frames. For example, Okunev and White (2003) test four trading systems on
eight forex currency pairs over a 20-year period. As can be expected, as more trading systems
and currencies are tested and the time frame is extended, more time, money, and computing
power is required. The current study is ambitious in that it analyzes 63 trading systems on seven
forex currency pairs over a 35-year period. To my knowledge, there are no other empirical
studies on technical analysis with this same broad scope.
In addition, I introduce a yet untested qualifying factor, complexity. Most simply, complexity
is defined as the utilization of sophisticated formulas, multiple technical indicators,
independently defined exits, intermarket analysis, and/or dynamically self-adjusting technical
trading rules within the trading system. While previous studies have stated that complexity has a
positive correlation with market returns and improved resistance to the ever more efficient
markets (Neely, Weller and Ulrich 2009), there is no empirical test of that theoretical argument
in the literature. In summary, this study builds on previous studies of technical analysis in the
foreign exchange market by testing (1) the profitability an extensive number of publicly
available technical trading systems, and (2) the effect of complexity on strategy returns and
robustness.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 6/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
II. THE PRACTICE OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
As stated previously, technical analysis can be defined as "the study of market action,
primarily through the use of charts, for the purpose of forecasting future price trends" (Murphy
1999). Price charts are the most frequently used tool by the market technician, hence the
outdated nickname "chartist". Today, practitioners of technical analysis are typically referred to
as ―technicians.‖ Figure 1 presents a price chart with technical indicators.
[Insert Figure 1 about here.]
Though evidence of technical analysis usage appears in some form since the 17th century
Dutch tulip market and the 18th century Japanese rice markets, modern technical analysis traces
back to Wall Street Journal articles written at the end of the 19th century by Charles Dow
(namesake of the Dow Jones Industrial Average), though Dow did not use the term technical
analysis. According to textbooks on the subject, technical analysis is based on three basic tenets:
(1) market action efficiently summarizes all microeconomic, macroeconomic and behavioral
information; (2) prices move in trends; and (3) history repeats itself (Murphy 1999).
As an extension of the belief that all available information is contained within price history,
some technical purists do not perform fundamental or economic analyses because that
information is already ―built in‖ to the price data. However, the majority of market technicians
use a combination of technical and fundamental analysis and the more recently adopted flow
analysis (Menkhoff and Taylor 2007). Technicians believe that price data forecasts
fundamentals, and not the reverse (Murphy 1999), since there is a period of learning where some
traders recognize and anticipate changes before others. Engel and West (2005) tested and
validated this theoretical position.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 7/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Other common beliefs of technical analysts include ―the trend is your friend‖, ―cut your
losers short and let the winners ride,‖ and ―prices don’t lie‖ (Lefevre 1994). As suggested by the
first, trends need to form and sustain themsemselves long enough to be identified, capitalized
upon, and held until reversed in order to profit from them. This ties in to the second belief that
profitable positions are held as long as possible, while unprofitable positions exit as soon as
possible. This same concept was discussed nearly 200 years ago by economist and trader James
Grant (1838).
The third concept that ―prices don’t lie‖ acknowledges that some companies are not
completely forthright with the public about their company’s financial position. This was most
blatantly illustrated with the Enron and WorldCom frauds, though it is quite common practice for
public companies to ―manage‖ their numbers and work within GAAP rules in order to show
financial statements in the best possible light. In addition to financial statement manipulation,
television pundits fill the airwaves with contradictory information and Wall Street analysts use
tactics such as publicly promoting the positive aspects of a position so that their firm will have a
market to sell into. Technicians feel that the best way to cut through this ―noise‖ and decipher the
true direction of the position is through price trends because no matter what is publicly disclosed,
if a financial vehicle (stock, bond, forex pair, etc.) is being bought or sold, that represents
―putting your money where your mouth is‖. [Please refer to Murphy (1999) and Pring (1991) for
a more in depth coverage of technical analysis.]
The Eff icient M arket H ypothesis and Academic Skepticism
The Efficient Market Hypothesis is a theory popularized by Eugene Fama (1970) that
operates on the belief that the markets have become efficient enough where the price one would
pay at any given point in time is fair and accurate. This means that there are no inefficiencies in
the market to exploit. Nothing is under or overpriced, rendering fundamental analysis useless,
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 8/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 6
and there are no trends or historical patterns to exploit, rendering technical analysis useless. The
core belief of the Efficient Market Hypothesis is that the return one will receive for the purchase
of a financial vehicle such as stocks or commodities is equal to the risk one bears while holding
that vehicle. Low risk securities will earn a relatively low return and conversely high risk
securities garner high returns.
After its emergence in the 1970s, the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) quickly gained in
popularity until it became the dominant paradigm and the foundation of Modern Portfolio
Theory in the 1980s. The subsequent two decades have seen the decline of the EMH and the
emergence of behavioral finance, a field of study in finance organized under the belief that the
market is an aggregate of human actions replete with inefficient and imperfect decisions.
Efficient markets should not have bubbles or crashes, so the dot-com crash and 2008 financial
crisis exposed holes in the theory and practitioners sought elsewhere for theoretical arguments
that better explain modern markets.
One alternative perspective, the Adaptive Market Hypothesis (Lo 2004; Lo 2005; Neely,
Weller, and Ulrich 2005) posits that profit opportunities from inefficiencies exist in financial
markets, but are eroded away as the knowledge of the efficiency spreads throughout the public
and the opportunity is capitalized upon. As opposed to its mutually exclusive relationship with
EMH, technical analysis dovetails nicely with AMH. With EMH falling out of favor over the last
twenty years, technical analysis gained.
Categories of Technical Analysis
Technical analysis can be classified as qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative technical
analysis involves discovering visual patterns in a chart of historic data. Patterns range from the
popular ―head and shoulders‖ pattern (Osler and Chang 1995) to the lesser known ―island
reversal‖ pattern. See Figure 2 for an illustration of a head and shoulders pattern.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 9/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 7
[Insert Figure 2 about here.]
Qualitative technical analysis is subjective in nature and thus, can be difficult to test. The
efficacy of chart patterns are not included in this study, but there others have attempted to
quantify and analysis this method (e.g., Chang and Osler 1995, 1999; Lo, Mamaysky, and Wang
2000). Despite the difficulty in recreating subjective human pattern recognition abilities, results
from prior endeavors indicate that some patterns do have predictive power. [Please refer to
Bulkowski (2005) for a thorough chart pattern reference book.]
Quantitative technical analysis performs mathematical and statistical calculations on historic
data, typically price and volume data, in an attempt to forecast future prices. Technicians use
tools called ―technical indicators‖ that are visual representations of the quantitative calculations
on a chart. For example, the most commonly used technical indicator is likely the simple moving
average (SMA). The simple moving average is used to smooth the ―noise‖ from price
fluctuations in an attempt to distinguish a trend (see Figure 3).
[Insert Figure 3 about here.]
Technical indicators are rarely used in isolation by practitioners, but are merely a set of tools
that can be combined together to form a trading system. This is described in detail later.
III. TECHNICAL INDICATORS, TRADING SYSTEMS, BACKTESTING,
AND OPTIMIZATION
Technical I ndicators
Technical indicators are important tools used by technical analysts. A technical indicator can
be defined as a numerical and/or visual representation of current and historical price, volume
and/or market composition data in order to isolate trends, turning points or optimal entry/exit
points. They range from the very simple (moving averages) to the more complex (Commodity
Channel Index). While moving averages have been covered in depth, notably in Brock,
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 10/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 8
Lakonishok, and LeBaron's seminal paper (1992), other popular indicators used widely in the
industry have been explored by the academic community less frequently. For example,
practitioners frequently use the moving average convergence-divergence indicator (MACD),
relative strength index (RSI), Bollinger Bands, and Stochastic indicators, though few have tested
them as part of a trading system. Bollinger Bands are illustrated in Figure 4.
[Insert Figure 4 about here.]
Technical indicators typically have inputs in order to customize the indicator to the
underlying financial vehicle. For example, the Bollinger Bands indicator allows the user to
customize the length of time used (e.g., 30 days) and the standard deviations of the upper and
lower bands. The inputs can be arbitrarily chosen or they can be ―optimized‖ by cycling through
a range of inputs to determine what would have been most effective over historic price data.
[Optimization is explained in more detail in a later section.]
Currently, the most extensive amount of information on technical indicators is outside the
academic community (e.g., Achelis 2001; Elder 1993; Katz and McCormick 2000; Kaufman
2005; Murphy 1991, 1999; Pring 1991; Wilder 1978). Indicators are very popular in technical
analysis because they consolidate decisions into a simple Boolean decision-making process, and
eliminate subjectivity as well as natural human emotions (e.g., fear, greed, anger, frustration).
An example of a technical indicator used here is the Relative Strength Index or RSI (Wilder
1978) that is mathematically represented as:
( )
( )
where n is the number of trading days, U is the change on all ―up‖ days (days where the close is
higher than the open), D is the change on all ―down‖ days (days where the close is lower than the
open), and EMA is an exponential moving average. The RSI indicator is normalized between 0
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 11/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 9
and 100, with zero indicating weakness (closing price is near recent lows) and 100 indicating
strength (closing price is near recent highs). It is typically used as a mean reversion indicator,
which designates a reversal of a trend. Crossing the 70 line is a sell trigger and crossing the 30
line is a buy trigger.
If one only had to follow the buy and sell signals on one indicator to earn a profit in the
markets, there would be no need for this study — all traders would currently be using that
indicator. Unfortunately, there is no single indicator that will predict profitable trades on a
perfectly consistent basis. Traders instead use combinations of trading indicators, rules, filters,
money management, entries, and exits in order to create a trading system (also referred to as a
trading strategy), described in the next section.
Beginners often look for a magic bullet-a single indicator for making money. Ifthey get lucky for a while, they feel as if they discovered the royal road to profits.
When the magic dies, amateurs give back their profits with interest and go
looking for another magic tool. The markets are too complex to be analyzed by a single indicator. (Elder 1993)
Although it is rare for practitioners to use individual indicators in isolation for trading
decisions, there are some academic studies that assess the efficacy of technical analysis based on
this flawed assumption (e.g., Dempster and Jones 2000). To their credit, Dempster and Jones
(2000) acknowledge this flaw at the end of their paper. The majority of the trading systems
tested in this study utilize multiple indicators, rules, and filters. However, for the sake of
understanding the impact of complexity with regard to single indicator trading systems (which
are relatively simple), some single indicator trading systems are tested here as well.
Tr ading Systems
A trading system is the culmination of all weapons in the technical analyst's arsenal. Trading
systems ideally begin with a theory based on the technician's observations of market activity — a
pattern or trend that has played out consistently over time or appears to be developing in the near
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 12/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 10
future that the technician believes can be capitalized upon. The technician decides which tools
would most accurately identify and capture the essence of that theory. Robust trading systems
typically incorporate trading rules, filters, money management, entries, and exits.
Trading Rules. Trading rules explicitly state when to enter and when to exit the position. The
rules may utilize one or more technical indicators (e.g., the MACD indicator rises from below to
above the zero line), price action (e.g., the closing price is higher than previous day’s closing
price for 3 consecutive days), fundamental data (e.g., US GDP increasing quarter over quarter),
or any other quantifiable metric.
Filters. In addition to rules, some trading strategies also employ filters in order to limit the
number of trades the system creates. Filters are considered a subset of trading rules because they
also involve rules based on technical indicators. A definition of a filter is that buy/sell signals
created by the trading system rules are ignored unless the filter criterion is also met. Since no
indicator or system is accurate every time, filters are employed in the attempt to capture only the
best opportunities and avoid "whipsaw", the unfortunate situation induced by a rapid succession
of buy and sell signals in non-trending markets, that leads to a large number of unprofitable
trades. Filters are also created either with technical indicators or non-indicator data. ―Ignore the
buy signal generated by a trading rule if the ADX indicator (shows strength of a trend) is below
10‖ is an example of a filter .
Money Management. Another important factor in a trading system, perhaps the most
important factor, is money management. Money management is a general term that covers topics
such as the amount of capital to be used in each trade, the maximum allowable loss per trade,
how and when to close profitable trades, the number of open trades allowed to be open at any
time, etc. A basic concept in trading — letting winners run and cutting losers short — falls under
the category of money management.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 13/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 11
Some traders believe that money management is the most important ingredient in
a trading program, even more crucial than the trading approach itself. I’m not
sure I’d go that far, but I don’t think it’s possible to survive for long without it.
(Murphy 1999)
Entries . All trading systems must have entries and exits. Entries, as the name suggests, are
the point when the trading system enters the market either by going long (buying) or going short
(selling short) the investment vehicle. Entries occur when predetermined trading rules, and
possibly filters, defined in the trading system are triggered.
Exits . Exits can be broken into three categories: reversals, targets, and stop losses. Exits are
an important part of a trading system’s money management and thus, a very important part of the
trading system. Reversal stops, the simplest of the three, take the opposite side of the current
trade, occurring when an entry signal is triggered in the opposite direction. Targets are exits
performed when the trade has reached an acceptable level of profit or a predetermined price or
percentage change from the entry point.
Stop losses are safeguard exits put in place to prevent exorbitant losses. They can be fixed,
trailing, or dynamic. Fixed stop losses generate an exit signal when the trade has either lost a
predetermined dollar amount, or the price has moved adversely by a predetermined number or
percentage. Trailing stop losses move in tandem with the currency, trailing below (above for
short trades) for each incrementally higher (lower) movement in price. With any movement
against the direction of the trade, the trailing stop stays fixed in place. Should the price move far
enough against the trade, the stop loss will be triggered, the trade will be exited, and the trading
system position will now be ―flat.‖ Dynamic stop losses are the most complex form of stop
losses and are a blend of technical indicators and stop losses. The similarities to technical
indicators lie in that they incorporate mathematical or statistical calculations and additional
factors (such as volatility) besides price highs and lows within the stop loss formula. In fact,
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 14/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 12
some technical indicators are designed to be used as stop losses, and include the Parabolic Stop
and Reverse (Wilder 1978).
Trading Systems: An Example. An example of a relatively simple trading system used in
this study is the channel breakout system. The entry rule is: go long (short) when the closing
price crosses above (below) the maximum (minimum) of the closing prices over the last x days.
No additional indicators or filters are used, and exits are dynamic and executed by the Parabolic
Stop and Reverse (SAR) indicator, an intelligent trailing stop. There are three inputs: (1) number
of lookback days for the channel highs/lows, (2) the Parabolic SAR acceleration factor, and (3)
the Parabolic SAR acceleration limit. Mathematically, the entry rule is expressed as
( )
( )
where C is closing price, t is today, n is the number of lookback days given as an input. The
channel breakout system creates a ―channel‖ around the price history over n days, the idea being
that a breakout to the upside (downside) is a strong directional movement and the start of a new
trend.
Backtesting
Backtesting is the process of applying a trading system to actual historical data to evaluate
how well the system would have performed. Before the proliferation of advanced computing
software, backtesting was done manually. This was an immensely time consuming process and
even when it was finally completed, it was prone to errors. There are also subtle nuances that
may be overlooked: e.g., what buy or sell price the strategy should get as opposed to what it
would actually get given live market conditions. Computing software programs have vastly
improved over time, thus reducing human error and unrealistic market expectation problems.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 15/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 13
Optimization
Optimization is the process of cycling through a vast number of possible trading system
inputs and backtesting each combination on historic data in order to determine the optimal
inputs. As stated previously, both technical indicators and trading systems — which utilize
technical indicators — have inputs that can be customized to the users preferences and to the
financial vehicle (stock, forex pair, etc.).
To optimize, the user defines the input starting point, ending point, and increment value. For
example, if a trading system has two inputs (indicator 1-number of days, indicator 2-number of
days) and sets the minimum at five, maximum at 400, and increment of five for each of the two
inputs, that would result in 80 for each input [400/5]. Because there are two inputs, the number
of tests are multiplicative and the total backtests for this example would be 6,400 [80 x 80]. This
process is extremely computer intensive and time-demanding, depending on the number of tests
and the formulas built into the trading system.
Brute Strength Optimization. ―Brute strength‖ optimization, also referred to as ―exhaustive‖
optimization, is the process of backtesting the full spectrum of tests that results from the input
range. Using the previous example, the full 6,400 backtests would be executed.
Genetic Optimization. Genetic optimization is a technique developed to reduce the
computing time required for optimizations. It mimics Darwinian evolution by defining
chromosomes (input parameters), establishing a fitness metric (e.g., net profit), and performing
backtests where weak input parameters (low net profit) ―die out‖ and strong input parameters
(high net profit) live on to create future generations of similar but slightly different inputs. This
repeats until the strongest set of input parameters remain. The TradeStation platform, used
exclusively for optimization in this study, describes genetic optimization in general terms as
following these steps:
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 16/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 14
1. An initial population of chromosomes (combination of strategy parameter values) israndomly chosen.
2. The fitness criterion is used to identify the best specimens.
3. Weakest chromosomes are discarded.
4.
Mutation and crossover are used to find new chromosomes to replace the ―weak‖ones.
5. The replacement chromosomes are put in the population, defining the nextgeneration.
6. Return to step 2 for fitness evaluation until the last generation is concluded.
7. Find the chromosome with the best fitness in the population.
8. The final chromosome contains the optimized parameter values.
Genetic optimization significantly reduces the number of backtests required in an
optimization. Using the example above with TradeStation’s suggested genetic optimization
settings, backtests are reduced by 80 percent from 6,400 to 1,280 with results the same or very
close to that of brute force optimization. As a rule, genetic optimization is used in this study
unless the total number of tests is too few (under 1,000) that brute force optimization is rendered
acceptable. Genetic programming is an increasingly popular technique in technical analysis
studies not only for optimization purposes, but also to determine trading rules (Allen and
Karjalainen 1995; Dempster and Jones 2000; Neely, Weller, and Dittmar 1997).
Controll ing for Data Snooping. A frequent problem of early studies of technical analysis
was that input parameters (e.g., number of days for a moving average) were selected either
arbitrarily or based on common usage (Poole 1967). There is no reason to believe that arbitrary
inputs would ever be successful except through luck and therefore, they are poor predictors of
the efficacy of technical analysis. As for testing commonly used input parameters, they are
popular because they were successful in the past (the time period being tested), and may not have
good predictive power.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 17/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 15
Optimization solves the problem of what input parameters to use by cycling through a large
number of possible inputs to determine the best one, however it introduces another problem
called ―curve fitting‖. Curve fitting occurs when the inputs chosen are picture perfect for the
sample time period being tested, yet perform poorly in a future time period(s). In order to control
for these problems, a two-step process is taken. First, the available data is divided into two
sections: in-sample data and out-of-sample data. Optimization is performed on the in-sample
data in order to isolate potential input parameters. Those input parameters are then backtested on
the non-optimized out-of-sample data to see if the positive results from optimization are real or
the result of curve fitting.
IV. BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES
Technical Analysis in the Stock Market
Early studies on the effectiveness of technical analysis focus on the stock market. They are
notable both in that most find technical analysis to be ineffective, and also that many are
performed by original proponents of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). For example,
Fama and Blume (1966) report that using filter rules on US stocks is unprofitable when taking
transaction costs into account. Fama (1970) then declared technical analysis to be a futile
undertaking, at which time he introduced the EMH based on his doctoral thesis.
A frequently cited study on the usefulness of technical analysis in the stock market (Brock,
Lakonishok, and LeBaron 1992) gained notoriety because the findings conflict with Fama
(1970). The authors illustrate that the use of simple moving average crossovers, a basic technical
analysis technique, can yield excess returns in the stock market that cannot be accounted for by
null ―random walk‖ models such as ARMA or GARCH. Note that the focus of this paper is on
the foreign exchange market and thus, discussion on the stock market is constrained. [Please
refer to Park and Irwin (2007) for a comprehensive review of the technical analysis literature as a
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 18/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 16
whole, and Menkhoff and Taylor (2007) for an equally good review of the literature specifically
within the forex market.]
The Use of Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange (for ex) Market
Ever since floating exchange rates were created in the early 1970’s to relieve the untenable
pressure to peg the US dollar to gold prices, researchers have suspected that technical analysis
was used frequently by practitioners in the forex market. However, this belief was not
systematically tested until Allen and Taylor (1990, 1992) surveyed chief forex dealers in
London. The results were striking as nearly 90 percent of sampled dealers reported placing some
importance on technical analysis. In addition, technical analysis was overwhelmingly preferred
on shorter time frames (intraday), whereas fundamental analysis preferred on longer time frames
(over one year).
More recently, similar studies were performed for forex dealers in Austria (Gehrig and
Menkhoff 2004; Oberlechner 2001), Germany (Gehrig and Menkhoff 2004; Menkhoff 1997;
Oberlechner 2001), Hong Kong (Cheung and Wong 2000; Lui and Mole 1995), Singapore
(Cheung and Wong 2000), Switzerland (Oberlechner 2001), Tokyo (Cheung and Wong 2000),
the United Kingdom (Cheung, Chinn, and Marsh 2004; Oberlechner 2001), and the US (Cheung
and Chinn 2001). Though the number of responses and response rates are quite different for each
of these studies, results are notably similar. Findings show that (1) practitioners who use some
type of technical analysis range from 90 percent to 100 percent, (2) technical analysis is more
important for short time frames, and (3) fundamental analysis is more important for longer time
frames. Based on these independent findings, it is safe to say that technical analysis is a widely
used and integral part of the foreign exchange market.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 19/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 17
Profi tabil ity of Techni cal Analysis in the Foreign Exchange (forex) Market
While it is well-established that technical analysis is an important part of the foreign
exchange market, the question of profitability shows mixed results. Early studies on simple
moving average and filter rules in the foreign exchange market find sizeable net profits (Cornell
and Dietrich 1978; Dooley and Shafer 1984; Logue and Sweeney 1977; Logue Sweeney and
Willett 1978; Poole 1967; Sweeney 1986). However, with the exception of Dooley and Shafer
(1984) and Sweeney (1986), the studies have many shortcomings by today’s standards. For
example, commissions, slippage, and interest rate carry costs are not included. The authors also
neglect to perform statistical tests to determine if the profitability occurred by chance, and they
fail to test if the profits are compensation for the bearing of risk — which is an implication of the
EMH. Because Dooley and Shafer (1984) and Sweeney (1986) attempt to address these issues,
they are the most cited of these early studies. Interestingly, modern studies that use improved
methodologies and analytical techniques support many findings of these early flawed studies
(LeBaron 1999; Menkhoff and Schlumberger 1995; Neely 1997; Pilbeam 1995; Saacke 2002;
Surajaras and Sweeney 1992). On balance, the majority of studies find technical analysis to be
profitable, though recent studies suggest that those profits have been eroded over time to close to
zero since the 1990s. More complex forms of technical analysis can still find modest profits
(Neely, Weller and Ulrich 2009).
Accounti ng for Risk
Perhaps the biggest challenge faced in technical analysis research is determining the ideal
method of accounting for risk. As stated previously, proponents of the EMH do not state that
technical analysis rules must be unprofitable, only that any excess profit is compensation for the
bearing of risk. Cornell and Dietrich (1978) were the first to address this by using an
international capital asset pricing model (ICAPM). Unfortunately, the study is flawed since the
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 20/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 18
beta is calculated on the foreign currencies themselves and not on the trading positions taken on
the foreign currencies.
Sweeney (1986) is an oft-cited pioneer in measuring risk compensation who compares
trading rules on currencies versus buy and hold currency strategies. He reports significant profit
opportunities that are not explained by the bearing of risk. This result is questioned due to the
fact that expecting a positive return on a buy and hold currency strategy implies that one
currency has a positive outlook while the other has a negative outlook (cf. Cornell and Dietrich
1978). In addition, the assumption that the forex risk premium is constant and does not change
over time is not realistic. Taylor (1992) uses a first-order autoregressive process to create a time-
varying risk premium calculation and does not find that returns are due to risk, though it is
possible that the model does not calculate risk premium perfectly. In contrast, Kho (1996) finds
that a good portion of the excess returns from technical trading rules is a result of the bearing of
risk when excess returns are related to the world stock portfolio (MSCI) using ICAPM and
GARCH-m models to calculate expected risks.
Another method commonly used by modern researchers to account for risk is the Sharpe
Ratio (Sharpe 1966) that relates the net returns to the standard deviation of those returns.
Mathematically, this is shown as
where R is the asset return, R f is the return on a benchmark asset (frequently the risk free rate of
return), and is the standard deviation of the excess of the asset return. The Sharpe ratio on the
trading rule returns is then compared to the Sharpe ratio on a broad portfolio index like the S&P
500 or MSCI (Neely 1997; Chang and Osler 1999; Saacke 2002). These studies show that
technical trading rule risk-adjusted returns are higher than that of the benchmark. It should be
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 21/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 19
noted that the Sharpe ratio, like other risk measurement techniques is imperfect since it requires a
long period of time (22 years for significance at the five percent level) and it does not measure
the perception of risk, which is inherently difficult to quantify. Alternatively, Menkhoff and
Schlumberger (1995) stress the monthly difference in trading rule profitability to buy and hold
profitability to determine practitioner myopic loss aversion posture. Due to the instability of the
monthly returns, their data show that excess profits cease to be significant at the 5% level.
In this study, I expand on the extant literature and utilize the Sharpe ratio of trading rule
returns in relation to the Sharpe ratio of buy and hold returns on the US stock market as
represented by the S&P 500 index to determine if the excess returns are in the form of risk
premia.
H1: Technical trading systems have out-of-sample excess profits that cannot be accounted for by the bearing of risk.
The Impact of Complexi ty
In addition to the main profit effects examined in H1, I also test a potentially important
qualifying factor, complexity. While previous studies have stated that more complex forms of
technical analysis outperform less complex forms and that their returns are more stable over time
(Menkhoff and Taylor 2007; Neely, Weller and Ulrich 2009), there is no empirical test of that
theoretical argument in the literature. Furthermore, a clear definition of complexity with regard
to technical trading systems is non-existent.
Most simply, complexity in technical trading systems is here defined as the utilization of
sophisticated formulas, multiple technical indicators, independently defined exits, intermarket
analysis, and/or dynamically self-adjusting technical trading rules within the trading system. I
test the theoretical relationship between complexity and profit stability by operationalizing
complexity and comparing the average Sharpe ratio across complexity levels.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 22/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 20
H2: More complex technical trading systems yield higher returns than less complex systems.
V. METHODOLOGY
General I nformation and Procedural Steps
The method used to determine the efficacy of trading systems is to program and
optimize/backtest them using the Tradestation software platform. The process involves the
following steps:
1. Select the target market [forex], target vehicles [7 major currency pairs], and target time
frame [daily].
2. Write programs in computer code that accurately reflect the technical trading systems.
3. Bifurcate the available test data. One half are used to generate optimal inputs for thetechnical trading system (in-sample data). The other half are used to test the tradingsystem with optimized inputs in a non-optimized environment (out-of-sample data). Thisis done to prevent data snooping. It is recommended that the optimization be performedon the more recent block of data so that it is better suited to handle future marketconditions.
4. Run optimizations for each trading system [63] on each currency pair [7] for a total of441 optimization cases, with a minimum of 5,000 tests per optimization. This results in atleast 2,205,000 tests that must be filtered down to the top 441. The minimum number of
backtests was 499 and the maximum was 357,604, with a mean of 69,030 backtests.
5. Organize the results and apply a scoring metric to all tests.
6. Select the top performing tests from each of the 441 optimizations.
7. Perform out-of-sample backtest using some of the top optimized inputs from the previousstep.
8. Analyze all out-of sample results.
Forex M arket
The focus here is on the forex market. Though technical analysis is used in all financial
markets, it is most prevalent in the foreign exchange market. Studies report that between 90 and
100 percent of forex market traders use technical analysis in some fashion (Gehrig and Menkhoff
2004; Menkhoff 1997; Taylor and Allen 1992). In a later US survey that asked forex respondents
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 23/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 21
what best describes their trading style, 29.53% categorized themselves as technical traders, the
largest percent of the four available categories (Cheung and Chinn 2001). The forex market was
also chosen based on the popular idea that it forms trends more often than other markets such as
the stock market (Clements 2010). There are additional benefits to the forex market over other
markets: e.g., it has a manageable number of currency pairs to work with (versus the massive
universe of stocks) and continuous price data (versus futures data that is broken up every few
months by contract expirations and must be blended together).
Cur rency Pairs
The currency pairs used in this study are the most widely traded, and therefore, the most
liquid currency pairs. Liquidity is crucial in the forex market because it narrows the loss from the
bid/ask spread. If one were to immediately buy and sell a currency pair, it would result in a loss
equal to the size of the spread in addition to any commissions involved. This is commonly
referred to as ―slippage.‖ Therefore, more liquid currency pairs with narrow spreads are
preferred. The six most liquid currency pairs are:
EUR/USD - Euro/US Dollar
GBP/USD - Great Britain Pound/US Dollar
USD/JPY - US Dollar/Japanese Yen
USD/CHF - Us Dollar/Swiss Franc
USD/CAD - US Dollar/Canadian Dollar
AUD/USD - Australian Dollar/US Dollar
In addition to the most liquid currency pairs, one additional currency pair was included
because it has gained a wide following amongst high frequency currency traders due to it having
the highest level of volatility. The higher the volatility of a currency pair, the more likely that
trading opportunities will appear over a given time frame. This currency pair is:
GBP/JPY - Great Britain Pound/Japanese Yen
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 24/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 22
Backtesting and Optimi zation Software
The Tradestation platform is recognized as the best of the best when it comes to backtesting
and rule based trading, winning numerous awards from well respected practitioner publications.
Awards include:
Barron’s – Best Online Broker (2011)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Institutional Platform (9 years in a row)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Professional Platform (9 years in a row)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Online Analytical Platform (8 years including 2011)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Futures Trading System (7 years in a row)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Stock Trading System (7 years in a row)
Stocks & Commodities – Best Real Time Data (2009, 2011)
Brokerage Star Awards – 1st Place (2010)
For this study, all indicators, trading systems, optimization, and backtests are programmed
and executed using Tradestation 9.0 (update 8585), the most advanced version when the data
were analyzed.
Data
All forex price data are provided by TradeStation and aggregated on a daily basis. Data
ranges used in this study for AUD/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CAD, USD/CHF and USD/JPY
include a 35.5-year time frame (1/1/1975 to 6/30/2010). The data ranges for EUR/USD and
GBP/JPY are from 1/1/1999 to 6/30/2010 (11.5 years).
The data was divided in half for in-sample and out-of-sample testing. In-sample data ranges
for AUD/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CAD, USD/CHF and USD/JPY are from 1/1/1993 to 6/30/2010
(17.5 years). In-sample data ranges for EUR/USD and GBP/JPY are from 7/1/2004 to 6/30/2010
(6 years). Out-of-sample data ranges for AUD/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CAD, USD/CHF and
USD/JPY are from 1/1/1975 to 12/31/1992 (18 years). Out-of-sample data ranges for EUR/USD
and GBP/JPY is 1/1/1999 to 6/30/2004 (5.5 years). All trades assumed one position of 100,000
forex lots in a given direction, long or short, or no position (flat).
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 25/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 23
Commissions and Slippage
Commission costs and slippage are based on TradeStation commission rates and the bid/ask
spread (slippage) tested on 2/15/2011. To be conservative, actual commission and slippage rates
are slightly increased. For example, actual commission costs for AUD/USD was $2.50 per trade
side, but $3.00 was used. Commission costs are estimated at:
AUD/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $3.00 per trade
EUR/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $3.25 per trade
GBP/JPY --------------------------------------------------------------------- $4.25 per trade
GBP/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $4.25 per trade
USD/CAD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $3.00 per trade
USD/CHF -------------------------------------------------------------------- $3.00 per trade
USD/JPY --------------------------------------------------------------------- $3.00 per trade
Slippage costs are estimated at:
AUD/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $20.00 per trade
EUR/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $20.00 per trade
GBP/JPY --------------------------------------------------------------------- $60.00 per trade
GBP/USD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $20.00 per trade
USD/CAD -------------------------------------------------------------------- $30.00 per trade
USD/CHF -------------------------------------------------------------------- $20.00 per trade
USD/JPY --------------------------------------------------------------------- $20.00 per trade
Tr ading Systems Tested in this Study
I test a wide variety of 63 trading systems that are available to the open public, located from
a variety of sources (Ammermann 2010; Bollinger 2002; Elder 1993; Katz and McCormick
2000; Murphy 1999; Pruitt and Hill 2003), including some that are self-created. The names and
sources of the trading systems are listed in Table 1. [Note that the strategy numbering system is
not strictly sequential due to changes from the original 64. Strategies 7, 8 and 9 were removed
and strategies 10 and 11 were subdivided into A and B. Original 64 strategies – 3 + 2 = 63.] For
more details on the trading system rules, technical indicators, and programming code for each
system, please contact the author directly.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 26/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 24
[Insert Table 1 about here.]
Tr ading System Complexi ty
As a clear definition of trading system complexity is neglected in the scientific literature, I
created an original operationalization that is based on concepts found in various technical
analysis textbooks (e.g., Kaufman 2005; Murphy 1999; Pring 1991; Pruitt and Hill 2003).
Complexity (defined above) is here operationalized via a formative scale created by adding one
point for each of the following complex tactics:
Entry uses more than 1 indicator type or calculation
Entry is dynamic (changes based on volatility)
System has an independently defined exit Exits are dynamic
System uses more than 1 time frame
System changes modes based on market condition.
The complexity score begins with a minimum score of one and cumulative points are added
if any of the previous six tactics are used. Therefore, all trading systems have a score ranging
from one to a possible maximum of seven. Applying the scoring metric to each of the 63 trading
systems yields the following distribution:
Complexity level 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- 10 (15.9%)
Complexity level 2 -------------------------------------------------------------- 23 (36.5%)
Complexity level 3 -------------------------------------------------------------- 11 (17.5%)
Complexity level 4 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 7 (11.1%)
Complexity level 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- 11 (17.5%)
Complexity level 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 (1.6%)
Complexity level 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 0 (0.0%)
Scori ng Metri c
The optimization process generated over 5,000 sets of parameter inputs for each of the 441
cases (63 trading systems x 7 currency pairs). Each set of parameter inputs has associated
(unique) in-sample profit metrics (e.g., net profit, maximum drawdown, number of trades,
percent of trades that were profitable). In order to select the parameter set that would perform the
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 27/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 25
best in the non-optimized out-of-sample data, the parameter sets must be rank ordered. The
ranking method is determined by the person performing the optimization and can vary
significantly, although net profit or Sharpe ratio are used most frequently. Unfortunately, Sharpe
ratio is not available in the TradeStation output data and thus, an alternative was required. I
chose not to use net profit in isolation due to inherent flaws in the metric. First, net profit does
not take the volatility of the returns into account. In addition, net profit only looks at the result as
of the arbitrarily chosen ending date of the test, and it is possible that all days before and after
were lackluster, but experienced a profit spike on the final day of the optimization. In order to
improve the chances of success for out-of-sample testing, I created a scoring metric that
combines multiple profitability measures.
The scoring metric utilizes four performance measurements:
Net Profit [Gross profit – Gross Loss]
Average trade [net profit / total number of trades]
Return on account [net profit / maximum drawdown]
Winning days [average days in winning trade * number of winning trades]
The four metrics are ranked as a percentage of the maximum of the parameter sets (N=5,000)
generated by the optimization process, and then summed together. Since there are four
performance measurements, the maximum possible score for a parameter set is 400%, indicating
that the parameter set matched the maximum in all four categories. Furthermore, any parameter
set that resulted in 2 or fewer trades was excluded, as there was insufficient data to ensure that
the results would hold up in the out-of-sample data set. All parameter sets were then sorted by
the scoring metric, and the highest score was selected. The scoring metric is advantageous
because it rewards high net profit, fewer trades (though a minimum of 3 is required), low
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 28/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 26
volatility via return on account, and a higher percentage of time ―in the market‖ versus being
―flat‖ via winning days.
VI. RESULTS
Risk Adjustment
This study follows the risk adjustment methodology used by Neely (1997), Chang and Osler
(1999), LeBaron (2000) and Saacke (2002). The basic procedure is: (1) to prevent data snooping
and curve fitting, the available price data is split in half, (2) optimization is performed on in-
sample data, (3) a scoring metric is applied to the optimized parameter sets, (4) the top
performing set is selected, then (5) applied to the out-of-sample portion of the data. The key risk-
adjusted return metric, the Sharpe ratio, is used to determine the success of the out-of-sample
results of the technical trade returns. That figure is then compared to the Sharpe ratio on a buy
and hold strategy of the S&P 500 US stock market index over the same time period.
Excess Prof it : H1
Recall that H1 predicts that technical trading systems have out-of-sample excess profits that
cannot be accounted for by the bearing of risk. As expected, the optimal trading system
parameters for the in-sample data yield significant net profits for all 441 cases (63 trading
systems x 7 currencies). The real test is to determine excess profits on out-of-sample data and to
compare the risk adjusted returns to that of the S&P 500 index over the same time period.
Approximately two-thirds (=67.1%) of the cases (285 of the 425 (441 – 16 with no trades)) are
profitable. Seventy-six of the 425 cases (=17.9%) had a Sharpe ratio that outperformed the
benchmark, with an average Sharpe ratio below zero at -0.02186. Table 2 presents the out-of-
sample results and comparisons to the S&P 500 Sharpe ratio for the total sample.
[Insert Table 2 about here.]
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 29/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 27
For a cross-section look at the data, out-of-sample results aggregated on the currency level
are displayed in Table 3.
[Insert Table 3 about here.]
The Impact of Complexity: H2
Data also show support for H2: i.e., more complex technical trading systems yield higher
returns than less complex systems. Applying the scoring metric, each of the 441 cases were then
aggregated and averaged via the Sharpe ratio for each level of complexity. Figure 5 displays the
average Shape ratio by complexity level.
[Insert Figure 5 about here.]
The overall regression model with the Sharp Ratio as the dependent variable and complexity
as the independent variable is significant ( F (1,439)=6.81, p=.009; R2=.015). The individual beta
coefficient for complexity replicates that result (b=.12, t =2.61, p=.009). As presented above, only
one percent of the cases are at the highest complexity levels. When those cases are excluded, the
data are relatively unaffected, only slightly enhanced: ( F (1,432)=7.49, p=.006; R2=.017; b=.13).
Isolating the more robust trading systems (complexity level 4 and above) yields much
stronger results. Eighty-nine out of 124 cases (=71.8%) are profitable, 30 out of 124 (=24.2%)
have a Sharpe ratio that beats the benchmark, and the average Sharpe ratio is positive at .00226.
Examination of simple trading systems (complexity 3 and below) shows that 196 out of 301
(=65.1%) are profitable, 46 out of 301 (=15.3%) have a Sharpe ratio that outperforms the
benchmark, and the average Sharpe rate is below zero at -0.03179. Table 4 displays various
performance metrics by complexity level.
[Insert Table 4 about here.]
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 30/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 28
VII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
This study builds on previous studies of technical analysis in the foreign exchange market by
testing (1) the profitability an extensive number of publicly available technical trading systems
over a 35-year period, and (2) the effect of complexity on strategy returns and robustness. The
profitability of the trading systems is mixed with 67.1% of the trading systems showing positive
net income, and 17.9% with risk-adjusted excess returns (as measured by the Sharpe ratio)
outperforming the risk-adjusted benchmark returns over the same time period. It is not surprising
that some of the trading systems offer sub-par performance as a wide variety of trading strategies
are used in this study, including those that are known to be relatively ―simple‖ in order to
determine the impact of complexity. However, results are similar to recent evidence (Neely,
Weller, and Ulrich 2009) that reports Sharpe ratios between -.35 and .65. The Sharpe ratio range
for this study is lower, ranging from -0.78 to .34. While the relatively high profitability
percentage (including simple strategies) points to the effectiveness of technical analysis, the
lower risk-adjusted excess returns percentage implies that a good portion, but not all of the
excess returns can be explained as compensation for the bearing of risk.
Looking at average returns across currency levels provides a unique cross-section view of the
results. In a thorough review of technical analysis literature in the forex market, Menkhoff and
Taylor (2007) argue that technical analysis tends to be more profitable with volatile currencies.
Extending this theoretical perspective to the current study, GBPJPY — the most volatile of the
currencies — was expected to provide the most opportunity for profit. However, GBPJPY shows
the lowest profitability percentage (12.7%) and the lowest average Sharpe ratio (-0.16). This
result is surprising as that currency was particularly selected because its’ high volatility makes it
popular amongst practitioners. Conversely, USDJPY is the most profitable (95.2%) and has the
highest average Sharpe ratio (.077) of the seven currencies tested. These results suggest that
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 31/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 29
strongly trending currencies such as USDJPY vastly outperform volatile currencies such as
GBPJPY. This also supports the oft-used technical analysis phrase, ―the trend is your friend.‖
Trends reverse too frequently for highly volatile currencies for trading opportunities to develop,
to be observed, and to then be capitalized on.
The analysis of profitability becomes most interesting when the risk-adjusted profit metrics
are examined in relation to complexity. Excluding complexity level six (which was limited to
only one trading system of the 63), incrementally moving upwards from level one shows a
consistent increase in Sharpe ratios, though there is a slight decrease from complexity level four
to five. Regression analysis shows that complexity is a statistically significant contributor to risk-
adjusted excess profits ( p<.01). Complexity is obviously not the only factor that can determine
risk-adjusted excess returns, as indicated by the relatively low model R 2 of .015. Additional
factors that affect profitability include the technical indicators used in the trading system, the
type of stop loss, the foreign currency pair, and most importantly, how capable the theory behind
the trading system is able to take advantage of the target market anomaly and the varying degrees
in which the anomaly is available at a given point in time.
The slight decline in profitability moving from complexity level four to five shows support
for practitioners who prefer to avoid ―bloated‖ trading systems and lean towards efficiency and
effectiveness (Kaufman 2005; Murphy 1999; Pruitt and Hill 2003). Simply adding random
technical indicators or filters without regard to the underlying theory will lead to a poor trading
system. Overly complicated systems collapse under their own weight and the technical trading
tools must be selected carefully. Similar to the writing process, perfection in trading systems ―is
achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to take away.‖
(Antoine de Saint-Exupery)
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 32/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 30
To filter out the effects of including relatively simple trading systems, the trading systems
were divided in half (simple systems: complexity levels one through three, and robust systems:
complexity levels four through six). Profitability in both groups is above 50%, though the robust
group outperforms the simple group by 6.7%. Risk-adjusted excess returns for the two groups is
also much better in the robust group, with an average Sharpe ratio of .02 versus -.03 for the
simple group.
In conclusion, these results provide strong evidence supporting statements by earlier
researchers that more complex strategies outperform those that are less complex (e.g., Neely et
al. 2009; Menkhoff and Taylor 2007). Additionally, this implies that technical analysis involves
skill and excess profits are not a product of luck, which flies contrary to the view of efficient
market proponents.
L imi tations and Futur e Research
The most challenging limitation encountered during the course of this study is the vast
amount of time and computing power required for the optimization process, that took six months
to complete using five computers running 24/7. Due to the time constraint, only the top
performing parameter set from each optimization was tested on the out-of-sample data. Further
insight may emerge by examining out-of-sample results on more parameter sets. In addition, the
recency of data from EURUSD and GBPJPY forced a study over a separate time period than the
other five currency pairs, over which the S&P 500 benchmark provided negative returns. This
skewed the percentage of cases that outperformed the benchmark for those two currencies.
Though it is the ―best of the breed‖, TradeStation is constantly working to improve their
award winning software platform, including handling multi-core threading, 64-bit technology
and feature set optimizations that will speed up the optimization process and facilitate future
research efforts. For example, TradeStation just released a new update that allows simultaneous
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 33/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 31
optimization and out-of-sample results output (April 2011). Another area of improvement for
TradeStation is the limited data output from the optimization process. The output is in comma
delimited text format rather than modern spreadsheet format and Sharpe ratios are notably
excluded from the output data. Thus, I developed the scoring metric as a suitable replacement for
the Sharpe ratio. Additional challenges with TradeStation include the unique calculation of
Sharpe ratio over the most recent 36 months rather than the whole time period that may have
been a factor in the lower Sharpe ratio results.
Continued improvements to the TradeStation platform — in addition to those mentioned
above — will provide even more avenues for exploration. On June 17, 2010, TradeStation
acquired the Grail Genetic Optimization (GGO) system noted for its superiority in feature set
compared to their own optimization tool. This system includes walk-forward optimization,
additional optimization fitness criteria, and improved analytics. The integration of the GGO is
being beta tested by users (including myself), and is scheduled to be completed in 2011. This is a
big step forward in the area of optimization.
The strongest test of trading systems is to further test them on out-of-sample data in future
periods (cf. Neely et al. 2009). I urge others to pursue such research. Recall that an untested
operationalization of trading system complexity was used here. A comprehensive test of
construct reliability and validity is warranted – for the current measurement scale and/or
alternative conceptualizations.
Future analysis can be performed through the study of additional trading systems not
included in this study (publicly available or proprietary), analysis of technical trading systems on
intra-day data, and lastly — an area that arguably needs the most attention — a universally
accepted method of measuring risk-adjusted returns that addresses the flaws of current methods.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 34/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 32
REFERENCES
Achelis, S. B. Technical Analysis from A to Z, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
Allen, Franklin, and Risto Karjalainen. ―Using Genetic Algorithms to Find Technical Trading
Rules.‖ Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, The Wharton School: University ofPennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1993.
Allen, Helen, and Mark Taylor. ―Charts, Noise and Fundamentals in the London Foreign
Exchange Market.‖ Economic Journal 100, no. 400 (1990): 49-59.
Ammermann, Peter, and Reuben Conceicao. ―A New Quantitative Approach for the
Management of a Student-Managed Investment Fund.‖ Working Paper, Department of
Finance, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, 2010.
Bollinger, John. Bollinger On Bollinger Bands. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2002.
Brock, W., J. Lakonishok, and B. LeBaron. ―Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic
Properties of Stock Returns.‖ The Journal of Finance 47 (1992): 1731-1764.
Bulkowski, Thomas N. Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
2005.
Chang, Kevin P, and Carol Osler. ―Methodical Madness: Technical Analysis and the Irrationality
of Exchange-Rate Forecasts.‖ Economic Journal , no. 109 (1999): 636-661.
Cheung, Yin-Wong, and Clement Yuk-Pang Wong. ―A Survey of Market Practitioners' Views on
Economic Value of Technical Trading Rules: A Nonparametric Utility-Based Approach.‖
Internatinoal Journal of Finance and Economics 10, no. 1 (2000): 41-62.
Cheung, Yin-Wong, and Menzie D. Chinn. ―Currency Traders and Exchange Rate Dynamics: A
Survey of the US Market.‖ Journal of International Money and Finance 20 (2001): 439-471.
Cheung, Yin-Wong, Menzie D. Chinn, and Ian W. Marsh. ―How do UK -Based Foreign
Exchange Dealers Think Their Market Operates?‖ International Jounral of Finance and
Economics 9, no. 4 (2004): 289-306.
Clements, Matthew. Technical Analysis in Foreign Exchange Markets. Guilford: Global Markets
Media Ltd, 2010.
Cornell, W. Bradford, and J. Kimball Dietrich. ―The Efficacy of the Market for Foreign
Exchange under Floating Exchange Rates.‖ Review of Economics and Statistics 6, no. 1
(1978): 111-120.
Dempster, M.A.H., and C.M. Jones. ―The Profitability of Intra-Day FX Trading Using Technical
Indicators.‖ Working Paper, Judge Institute of Management, University of Cambridge, 2000.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 35/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 33
Dooley, Michael P., and Jeffrey R. Shafer. ―Analysis of Short-Run Exchange Rate Behavior:
March 1973 to November 1981.‖ In Floating Exchange Rates and the State of World Trade
Payments, by David Bigman and Teizo Taya, 43-69. 1984.
Elder, A. Trading for a Living. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
Fama, Eugene F. ―Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work.‖ Journal
of Finance 25 (1970): 383-417.
Fama, Eugene F, and Marshall E Blume. ―Filter Rules and Stock -Market Trading.‖ The Journal
of Business 39, no. 1 part 2: Supplement on Security Prices (January 1966): 226-241.
Gehrig, Thomas, and Lukas Menkhoff. ―The Use of Flow Analysis in Foreign Exchange:
Exploratory Evidence.‖ Jounal of International Money and Finance, 2004: 573-594.
Gencay, R. ―Linear, Non-Linear and Essential Foreign Exchange Rate Prediction with Simple
Technical Trading Rules.‖ Journal of International Economics 47 (1999): 91-107.
Grant, James. The Great Metropolis. Philadelphia: E.L. Carey & A. Hart, 1838.
Katz, J. O., and D. L. McCormick. The Encyclopedia of Trading Strategies. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2000.
Kaufman, P. J. New Trading Systems and Methods: Fourth Edition. New Jersey: John Wiley &
Sons, 2005.
Kho, Bong-Chan. ―Time-Varying Risk Premia, Volatility, and Technical Trading Rule Profits:
Evidence from the Foreign Currency Futures Markets.‖ Journal of Financial Economics 41,no. 2 (1996): 249-290.
LeBaron, Blake. ―Technical Trading Rule Profitabiliity and Foreign Exchange Intervention.‖
Journal of International Economics 49, no. 1 (1999): 125-143.
Lee, C., K. Gleason, and I. Mathur. ―Trading Rule Profits in Latin American Currency Spot
Rates.‖ Internaional Review of Financial Analysis 10 (2001): 135-156.
Lefevre, Edwin. Reminiscences of a Stock Operator. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
Levich, R. M, and L. R. III Thomas. ―The Significance of Technical Trading-Rule Profits in theForeign Exchange Market: A Bootstrap Approach.‖ Journal of International Money and
Finance 12 (1993): 451-474.
Lo, A. W., H. Mamaysky, and J. Wang. ―Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational
Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation.‖ The Journal of Finance
55, no. 4 (2000): 1705-1765.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 36/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 34
Lo, Andrew. ―The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis: Market Efficiency from an Evolutionary
Perspective.‖ Journal of Portfolio Management , no. 30 (2004): 15-29.
Lo, Andrew, Harry Mamaysky, and Jiang Wang. ―Foundations of Technical Analysis:
Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation.‖ The
Journal of Finance LV, no. 4 (August 2000): 1705-1765.
Logue, Dennis E., and Richard James Sweeney. ―'White-Noise' in Imperfect Markets: The Case
of the Franc/Dollar Exchange Rate.‖ Journal of Finance 32, no. 3 (1977): 761-768.
Logue, Dennis E., Richard James Sweeney, and Thomas W. Willett. ―Speculative Behaviour of
Foreign Exchange Rates during the Current Float.‖ Journal of Business Research 6, no. 2
(1978): 159-174.
Lui, Yu-Hon, and David Mole. ―The Use of Fundamental and Technical Analyses by Foreign
Exchange Dealers: Hong Kong Evidence.‖ Journal of International Money and Finance 17,
no. 3 (1998): 535-545.
Maillet, B, and T. Michel. ―Further Insights on the Puzzle of Technical Analysis Profitability.‖
European Journal of Finance 6 (2000): 196-224.
Malkiel, Burton G. A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful
Investing. tenth edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.
Martin, A. D. ―Technical Trading Rules in the Spot Foreign Exchange Markets of Developing
Countries.‖ Journal of Multinational Financial Management 11 (2001): 59-68.
Menkhoff, Lukas. ―Examining the Use of Technical Currency Analysis.‖ International Journalof Finance & Economics 2, no. 4 (October 1997): 307-318.
Menkhoff, Lukas, and M. P. Taylor. ―The Obstinate Passion of Foreign Exchange Professionals:
Technical Analysis.‖ Journal of Economic Literature 45 (2007): 936-972.
Menkhoff, Lukas, and Manfred Schlumberger. ―Persistent Profitability of Technical Analysis on
Foreign Exchange Markets?‖ Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 48, no. 193
(1995): 189-216.
Murphy, John J. Intermarket Technical Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
— . Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets. New York: New York Institute of Finance,
1999.
Neely, Christopher J. ―Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange Market: A Layman's Guide.‖
Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review 79, no. 5 (1997): 23-38.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 37/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 35
Neely, Christopher J, and Paul A Weller. ―Intraday Technical Trading in the Foreign Exchange
Market.‖ Journal of International Money and Finance 22 (2003): 223-237.
Neely, Christopher J, Paul A Weller, and Joshua M Ulrich. ―The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis:
Evidence from the Foreign Exchange Market.‖ Journal of Financial and Quantitative
Analysis 44, no. 2 (April 2009): 467-488.
Neely, Christopher J, Paul A Weller, and R. Dittmar. ―Is Technical Analysis in the Foreign
Exchange Market Profitable? A Genetic Programming Approach.‖ The Journal of Financial
and Quantitative Analysis 32, no. 4 (1997): 405-426.
Oberlechner, Thomas. ―Importance of Technical and Fundamental Analysis in the European
Foreign Exchange Market.‖ International Journal of Finance and Economics 6, no. 1 (2001):
81-93.
Okunev, John, and Derek White. ―Do Momentum-Based Strategies Still Work in Foreign
Currency Markets?‖ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38, no. 2 (June 2003):
425-447.
Osler, Carol L, and Kevin P Chang. Head and Shoulders: Not Just a Flaky Pattern. Staff Report,
New York: FRB of New York, 1995.
Park, Cheol-Ho, and Scott H Irwin. ―What Do We Know About the Profitability of Technical
Analysis.‖ Journal of Economic Surveys 21, no. 4 (2007): 786-826.
Pilbeam, Keith. ―The Profitability of Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market: Chartists,
Fundamentalists, and Simpletons.‖ Oxford Economic Papers 47, no. 3 (1995): 437-452.
Poole, W. ―Speculative Prices as Random Walks: An Analysis of Ten Time Series of Flexible
Exchange Rates.‖ Southern Economic Journal 33 (1967): 468-478.
Pring, Martin J. Technical Analysis Explained. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Pruitt, G., and J. R. Hill. Building Winning Trading Systems with TradeStation. New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, 2003.
Saacke, Peter. ―Technical Analysis and the Effectiveness of Central Bank Intervention.‖ Journal
of International Money and Finance 21, no. 4 (2002): 459-479.
Schulmeister, S. ―Profitability of Technical Stock Trading: Has It Moved From Daily to
Intraday?‖ Review of Financial Economics 18 (2009): 190-201.
Sharpe, William F. ―Mutual Fund Performance.‖ Journal of Business 39, no. 1 (1966): 119-138.
Strong, Robert A. Portfolio Construction, Management, and Protection. 5th Edition. Mason,
OH: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2009.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 38/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 36
Surajaras, Patchara, and Richard J. Sweeney. Profit-Making Speculation in Foreign Exchange
Markets. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992.
Sweeney, R J. ―Beating the Foreign Exchange Market.‖ Journal of Finance 41 (1986): 163-182.
Taylor, Mark P, and Hellen Allen. ―The Use of Technical Analysis in the Foreign ExchangeMarket.‖ Journal of International Money and Finance 11 (1992): 304-314.
Wilder, J. Welles Jr. New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems. Greensboro: Hunter
Publishing Company, 1978.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 39/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 37
TABLE 1
List of Trading Systems
# System Name Source
1 ADX and Moving Average Strategy Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
2 Momentum, RSI-Based Strategy with Built-in MoneyManagement
Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
3 King Keltner Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
4 The Bollinger Bandit Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
5 The Thermostat-B Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
6 The Dynamic Break Out II Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
7 The Super Combo Day Trading Strategy - REMOVED Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
8 The Ghost Trader Trading Strategy - REMOVED Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
9 The Money Manager Trading Strategy - REMOVED Building Winning Trading Systemswith Tradestation
10A Triple Screen Trading System-EMA (w/ parabolic exit)- 1 (long term)
Trading For A Living
10B Triple Screen Trading System-EMA (w/ parabolic exit)- 2 (short term)
Trading For A Living
11A Triple Screen Trading System-MACD (w/ parabolicexit) - 1 (long term)
Trading For A Living
11B Triple Screen Trading System-MACD (w/ parabolicexit) - 2 (short term)
Trading For A Living
12 Channel Trading System (Elder) Trading For A Living
13 Welles Wilder's Parabolic and Directional MovementSystems (Parabolic ADX)
Technical Analysis of the FinancialMarkets
14 Bollinger Method I: Volatility Breakout (The Squeeze) – Parabolic exit
Bollinger on Bollinger Bands
15 Bollinger Method I: Volatility Breakout (The Squeeze) – Bollinger exit
Bollinger on Bollinger Bands
16 Bollinger Method II: Trend Following – Parabolic exit Bollinger on Bollinger Bands
17 Bollinger Method II: Trend Following – Bollinger exit Bollinger on Bollinger Bands
18 Close-Only Channel Breakout (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
19 Close-Only Channel Breakout (ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
20 Highest High / Lowest Low Breakouts (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
21 Highest High / Lowest Low Breakouts (ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
22 2 moving average crossover - SMA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 40/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 38
# System Name Source
Strategies
23 2 moving average crossover - EMA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
24 2 moving average crossover - Triangular (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 25 2 moving average crossover - VIDYA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 26 2 moving average crossover - SMA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 27 2 moving average crossover - EMA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 28 2 moving average crossover - Triangular (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 29 2 moving average crossover - VIDYA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 30 3 moving average crossover - SMA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 31 3 moving average crossover - EMA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 32 3 moving average crossover - Triangular (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 33 3 moving average crossover - VIDYA (no ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 34 3 moving average crossover - SMA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 35 3 moving average crossover - EMA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies
36 3 moving average crossover - Triangular (ADX) The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies 37 3 moving average crossover - VIDYA (ADX) The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 38 moving average slope - SMA Brian Leip
39 moving average slope - EMA Brian Leip
40 moving average slope - Triangular Brian Leip
41 moving average slope - VIDYA Brian Leip
42 Overbought/Oversold - RSI The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
43 Overbought/Oversold - Stochastic The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 44 Overbought/Oversold - CCI Avg Brian Leip
45 Signal Line - Stochastic The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
46 Signal Line - MACD - SMA - Open The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
47 Signal Line - MACD - EMA - Open The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
48 Signal Line - MACD - Triangular - Open The Encyclopedia of Trading
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 41/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 39
# System Name Source
Strategies
49 Signal Line - MACD - VIDYA - Open The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
50 Signal Line - MACD - SMA - With Trend The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 51 Signal Line - MACD - EMA - With Trend The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 52 Signal Line - MACD - Triangular - With Trend The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 53 Signal Line - MACD - VIDYA - With Trend The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 54 Signal Line - CCI Average Brian Leip
55 Zero Line - MACD - SMA The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
56 Zero Line - MACD - EMA The Encyclopedia of Trading
Strategies 57 Zero Line - MACD - Triangular The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
58 Zero Line - MACD - VIDYA The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
59 Zero Line - CCI Average Brian Leip
60 50 Line - RSI The Encyclopedia of TradingStrategies
61 Moving Average Percent Bands - SMA Ammermann
62 Moving Average Percent Bands - EMA Ammermann
63 Moving Average Percent Bands - Triangular Ammermann
64 Moving Average Percent Bands - VIDYA Ammermann
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 42/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
TABLE 2
Out-of-Sample Profitability Metrics and Benchmark Comparisons
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST01 AUDUSD 3 (33,680.00) 10 20.00% 33,738.00 400.00 60.00 -1.81% (235.98) 2,014.36 -0.23 0.15 NO NO
ST01 EURUSD 3 (17,739.50 ) 3 66.67% 21,656.50 120.00 19.50 -4.56% (684.18) 3,050.62 -0.26 -0.08 NO NO
ST01 GBPJPY 3 (61,316.08) 38 28.95% 66,967.66 4,560.00 323.00 -13.35% (1,521.11) 4,358.80 -0.29 -0.08 NO NO
ST01 GBPUSD 3 (7,397.50) 15 40.00% 59,394.00 600.00 127.50 -0.45% (1,160.59) 6,316.96 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST01 USDCAD 3 (1,179.24) 2 0.00% 1,179.24 1 20.00 12.00 -0.07% (235.13) 514.93 -0.78 0.15 NO NO
ST01 USDCHF 3 46,294.25 10 70.00% 3,086.39 400.00 60.00 2.38% 187.25 2,817.06 0.14 0.15 NO YES
ST01 USDJPY 3 (924.24) 7 42.86% 20,405.40 280.00 42.00 -0.06% 407.78 3,648.83 0.01 0.15 NO NO
ST02 AUDUSD 3 2,232.00 8 37.50% 33,814.00 320.00 48.00 0.14% (52.90) 1,453.17 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST02 EURUSD 3 8,585.00 8 8 7.50% 9,046.50 320. 00 52.00 2.30% 613.21 2,233.59 0.22 -0.08 YES YES
ST02 GBPJPY 3 (3,521.53) 6 16.67% 19,430.05 720.00 51.00 -0.97% (199.00) 4,678.90 -0.03 -0.08 YES NO
ST02 GBPUSD 3 63,790.00 20 55.00% 42,065.50 800.00 170.00 3.08% (337.09) 6,948.92 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST02 USDCAD 3 18,428.35 20 3 5.00% 10,430.89 1,200.00 120.00 1.06% 128.57 1,308.06 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST02 USDCHF 3 13,942.49 17 35.29% 51,217.02 680.00 102.00 0.82% (1,298.22) 3,579.32 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST02 USDJPY 3 14,914.36 19 26.32% 51,630.79 760. 00 114.00 0.87% (27.90) 3,210.89 0 0.15 NO YES
ST03 AUDUSD 3 30,572.00 48 31.25% 12,294.00 1,920.00 288.00 1.67% (145.20) 1,556.63 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST03 EURUSD 3 3,362.50 25 8.00% 20,834.50 1,000.00 162.50 0.92% 244.83 2,914.91 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST03 GBPJPY 3 (12,196.66) 16 18.75% 14,145.02 1,920.00 136.00 -3.21% (378.96) 4,714.05 -0.08 -0.08 YES NO
ST03 GBPUSD 3 82,706.00 24 29.17% 62,457.50 960.00 204.00 3.77% (879.09) 8,347.46 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST03 USDCAD 3 20,157.11 38 18.42% 7,607.42 2,280.00 228.00 1.15% 88.76 1,378.23 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST03 USDCHF 3 58,803.82 36 25.00% 41,270.44 1,440.00 216.00 2.89% (995.16) 3,320.57 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST03 USDJPY 3 57,835.61 24 12.50% 39,104.86 960.00 144.00 2.85% (61.58) 2,640.84 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST04 AUDUSD 5 23,598.00 32 34.38% 13,682.00 1,280.00 192.00 1.32% (216.95) 2,046.68 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST04 EURUSD 5 (3,244.00) 8 25.00% 11,0 27.00 320.00 52.00 -0.89% (115.86) 2,516.99 -0.1 -0.08 NO NO
ST04 GBPJPY 5 (17,900.50) 9 33.33% 18,463.66 1,080.00 76.50 -4.60% (335.16) 4,667.60 -0.11 -0.08 NO NO
ST04 GBPUSD 5 169,665.50 37 45.95% 14,601.00 1,480.00 314.50 6.20% 726.13 7,781.67 0.13 0.15 NO YES
ST04 USDCAD 5 13,156.01 16 43.75% 7,847.92 960.00 96.00 0.77% 205.41 1,360.56 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST04 USDCHF 5 94,169.25 27 48.1 5% 19,115.03 1,080.00 162.00 4.15% (110.30) 3,069.32 0.1 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 43/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST04 USDJPY 5 71,278.75 38 39.47% 37,677.54 1,520.00 228.00 3.36% (481.94) 2,925.50 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST05 AUDUSD 6 19,616.00 19 21.05% 12,020.00 760.00 114.00 1.12% (259.90) 2,061.14 0 0.15 NO YES
ST05 EURUSD 6 7,703.00 10 30.00% 11,803.00 400.00 65.00 2.07% 102.00 2,681.05 0 -0.08 YES YES
ST05 GBPJPY 6 (51,853.41) 12 8.33% 51,853.41 1,440.00 102.00 -11.67% (1,280.77) 4,308.92 -0.32 -0.08 NO NO
ST05 GBPUSD 6 (48,389.00) 34 38.24% 90,701.50 1,360.00 289.00 -2.47% (344.49) 7,054.27 -0.04 0.15 NO NO
ST05 USDCAD 6 27,155.66 6 50.00% 2,063.90 360.00 36.00 1.50% 109.56 1,297.59 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST05 USDCHF 6 101,831.91 21 33.33% 16,373.38 840.00 126.00 4.39% 13.48 3,376.07 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST05 USDJPY 6 84,745.29 25 56.00% 17,738.51 1,000.00 150.00 3.83% (125.26) 2,810.00 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST06 AUDUSD 5 12,526.00 14 28.57% 8,436.00 560.00 84.00 0.74% (123.10) 2,489.70 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST06 EURUSD 5 15,803.50 11 45.45% 5,726.50 440.00 71.50 4.10% 464.81 2,492.32 0.13 -0.08 YES YES
ST06 GBPJPY 5 (19,335.37) 10 30.00% 26,817.63 1,200.00 85.00 -4.94% (752.78) 4,574.48 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST06 GBPUSD 5 71,487.50 5 60.00% 28,717.00 200.00 42.50 3.37% (869.74) 6,641.41 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST06 USDCAD 5 11,729.65 6 33.33% 5,780.96 360.00 36.00 0.69% 104.25 1,320.51 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST06 USDCHF 5 14,018.40 6 33.33% 29,060.37 240.00 36.00 0.82% (775.41) 4,583.60 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST06 USDJPY 5 41,346.26 16 75.00% 5,855.30 640.00 96.00 2.16% 1,013.24 2,373.95 0.34 0.15 YES YES
ST10A AUDUSD 5 (2,828.00) 8 12.50% 3,282.00 320.00 48.00 -0.17% (108.77) 1,682.42 -0.16 0.15 NO NO
ST10A EURUSD 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST10A GBPJPY 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST10A GBPUSD 5 23,018.00 12 33.33% 12,465.50 480.00 102.00 1.29% 822.07 5,850.76 0.14 0.15 NO YES
ST10A USDCAD 5 3,897.76 9 44.4 4% 3,932.07 540.00 54.00 0.24% 31.91 1,015.66 -0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST10A USDCHF 5 (2,289.55) 3 0.00% 2,289.55 120.00 18.00 -0.14% (338.33) 4,127.65 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST10A USDJPY 5 21,868.54 15 40.00% 9,459.37 600.00 90.00 1.24% 194.24 2,939.48 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST10B AUDUSD 5 (11,840.00) 10 10.00% 12,744.00 400.00 60.00 -0.70% (101.80) 1,738.25 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST10B EURUSD 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST10B GBPJPY 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST10B GBPUSD 5 17,568.00 12 25.00% 12,112.50 480.00 102.00 1.01% 627.43 5,849.05 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST10B USDCAD 5 (3,413.40) 6 0.00% 3,413.40 3 60.00 36.00 -0.21% 294.41 1,420.62 0.09 0.15 NO NO
ST10B USDCHF 5 6,331.83 10 20.00% 3,164.30 400.00 60.00 0.38% 269.89 2,185.53 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST10B USDJPY 5 33,842.93 14 57.14% 4,352.16 560.00 84.00 1.82% 801.28 3,179.51 0.2 0.15 YES YES
ST11A AUDUSD 5 1,356.00 9 33.3 3% 4,802.00 360.00 54.00 0.08% 58.96 2,160.10 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 44/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST11A EURUSD 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST11A GBPJPY 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST11A GBPUSD 5 41,615.00 10 40.00% 6,735.50 400.00 85.00 2.17% 1,342.42 5,107.33 0.27 0.15 YES YES
ST11A USDCAD 5 11,013.62 11 45.45% 2,768.76 660.00 66.00 0.65% 196.73 1,037.17 0 0.15 NO YES
ST11A USDCHF 5 16,390.50 5 40.00% 1,660.72 200.00 30.00 0.95% 830.18 2,972.03 0.23 0.15 YES YES
ST11A USDJPY 5 838.54 3 33.33% 2,998.45 120.00 18.00 0.05% 68.01 2,650.57 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST11B AUDUSD 5 (11,034.00) 29 24.14% 12,256.00 1,160.00 174.00 -0.65% (50.78) 1,791.62 -0.15 0.15 NO NO
ST11B EURUSD 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST11B GBPJPY 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST11B GBPUSD 5 21,089.00 6 33.33% 12,5 14.00 240.00 51.00 1.20% 1,318.06 5,727.58 0.25 0.15 YES YES
ST11B USDCAD 5 (1,861.59) 7 14.29% 1,861.59 420.00 42.00 -0.12% (166.32) 878.39 -0.38 0.15 NO NO
ST11B USDCHF 5 (79, 438.09) 6 0.00% 79,438.09 240.00 36.00 -3.65% (1,904.90) 2,667.10 -0.76 0.15 NO NO
ST11B USDJPY 5 838.54 3 33.33% 2,998.45 120.00 18.00 0.05% 68.01 2,650.57 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST12 AUDUSD 4 (5,642.00) 2 0.00% 5,642.00 80.00 12.00 -0.34% (806.00) 2,085.57 -0.45 0.15 NO NO
ST12 EURUSD 4 17,372.00 8 100.00% - 320.00 52.00 4.47% 1, 930.22 1,261.23 1.32 -0.08 YES YES
ST12 GBPJPY 4 8,509.05 5 8 0.00% 3,553.77 600. 00 42.50 2.28% 686.88 3,658.84 0.16 -0.08 YES YES
ST12 GBPUSD 4 (24,780.50) 13 61.54% 47,819.50 520.00 110.50 -1.38% (750.92) 4,737.72 -0.18 0.15 NO NO
ST12 USDCAD 4 5,161.99 4 75.00% 6,705.55 2 40.00 24.00 0.31% (16.55) 1,278.33 -0.18 0.15 NO YES
ST12 USDCHF 4 7,942.26 25 68.00% 15,225.51 1,000.00 150.00 0.48% (207.09) 2,684.77 0 0.15 NO YES
ST12 USDJPY 4 3,707.59 13 69.23% 7,704.99 520.00 78.00 0.23% 119.72 2,083.50 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST13 AUDUSD 5 (30,060.00 ) 15 33.3 3% 31,336.00 600.00 90.00 -1.64% (34.05) 2,250.13 -0.19 0.15 NO NO
ST13 EURUSD 5 25,341.00 6 16.67% 6,896.00 240.00 39.00 6.31% 626.87 3,154.49 0.15 -0.08 YES YES
ST13 GBPJPY 5 3,135.40 8 62.50% 6,618.00 960.00 68.00 0.86% 80.24 5,254.19 0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST13 GBPUSD 5 (24, 365.50) 3 0.00% 24,365.50 120.00 25.50 -1.36% (1,123.32) 4,776.64 -0.24 0.15 NO NO
ST13 USDCAD 5 14,958.03 17 29.41% 9,524.85 1,020.00 102.00 0.87% (46.39) 1,320.81 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST13 USDCHF 5 52,410.37 86 40.70% 27,855.83 3,440.00 516.00 2.63% (154.14) 4,453.15 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST13 USDJPY 5 143,606.00 33 51.52% 13,633.55 1,320.00 198.00 5.56% 136.91 3,180.23 0.16 0.15 YES YES
ST14 AUDUSD 5 61,848.00 7 71.43% 2,416.00 280.00 42.00 3.01% (272.98) 1,416.52 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST14 EURUSD 5 3,504.00 4 5 0.00% 3,986.50 160. 00 26.00 0.96% 269.54 2,376.34 0.05 -0.08 YES YES
ST14 GBPJPY 5 (7,317.92) 12 41.67% 17,144.27 1,440.00 102.00 -1.97% (275.84) 4,234.19 -0.08 -0.08 YES NO
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 45/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST14 GBPUSD 5 (3,080.50) 33 42.42% 80,652.00 1,320.00 280.50 -0.19% 1,708.45 6,891.45 0.04 0.15 NO NO
ST14 USDCAD 5 4,845.33 15 40.00% 14,948.21 900.00 90.00 0.30% 229.24 1,283.94 -0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST14 USDCHF 5 27,242.71 20 65.00% 9,181.86 800.00 120.00 1.51% 973.15 2,811.33 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST14 USDJPY 5 74,269.96 33 57.5 8% 17,160.14 1,320.00 198.00 3.47% 270.26 3,027.88 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST15 AUDUSD 4 3,112.00 3 33.33% 4,396.00 1 20.00 18.00 0.19% 121.85 1,457.31 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST15 EURUSD 4 8,874.00 4 5 0.00% 4,853.00 160. 00 26.00 2.37% 328.67 2,650.67 0.07 -0.08 YES YES
ST15 GBPJPY 4 (16,731.48 ) 8 12.50% 17,440.58 960.00 68.00 -4.32% (758.07) 4,673.23 -0.17 -0.08 NO NO
ST15 GBPUSD 4 66,504.50 3 66.67% 16,798.50 120.00 25.50 3.19% (725.53) 5,338.65 0.15 0.15 YES YES
ST15 USDCAD 4 24,846.36 2 100.00% - 120.00 12.00 1.39% 94.21 1,042.71 0 0.15 NO YES
ST15 USDCHF 4 (5,521.56) 7 57.14% 20,410.95 280.00 42.00 -0.34% (639.90) 3,952.65 -0.05 0.15 NO NO
ST15 USDJPY 4 12,688.62 10 60.00% 21,903.65 400.00 60.00 0.75% (589.01) 2,605.88 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST16 AUDUSD 5 26,936.00 19 42.11% 7,588.00 760.00 114.00 1.49% (107.50) 1,940.20 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST16 EURUSD 5 (19,242.50) 25 12.00% 30,464.00 1,000.00 162.50 -4.91% (367.82) 3,501.65 -0.16 -0.08 NO NO
ST16 GBPJPY 5 (45,887.67) 39 25.64% 66,952.87 4,680.00 331.50 -10.55% (1,352.42) 4,795.24 -0.15 -0.08 NO NO
ST16 GBPUSD 5 30,493.50 29 37.93% 64,089.50 1,160.00 246.50 1.66% (1,000.30) 8,619.66 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST16 USDCAD 5 1,352.46 23 43.48% 9,473.11 1,380.00 138.00 0.08% (73.59) 1,010.26 -0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST16 USDCHF 5 121,107.33 17 47.06% 17,617.29 680.00 102.00 4.96% 476.57 3,573.04 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST16 USDJPY 5 88,284.19 18 50.00% 9,067.30 720.00 108.00 3.95% (127.60) 2,876.70 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST17 AUDUSD 4 29,532.00 33 48.48% 20,648.00 1,320.00 198.00 1.62% (102.95) 1,310.18 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST17 EURUSD 4 (3,218.00) 52 21.15% 16,265.50 2,080.00 338.00 -0.88% (143.71) 3,024.87 -0.07 -0.08 YES NO
ST17 GBPJPY 4 (20,656.82) 75 28.00% 45,903.24 9,000.00 637.50 -5.24% (816.70) 4,826.08 -0.08 -0.08 YES NO
ST17 GBPUSD 4 80,252.00 8 37.50% 44,414.00 320.00 68.00 3.68% (787.35) 8,649.77 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST17 USDCAD 4 15,620.50 10 30.00% 7,095.01 600.00 60.00 0.91% 56.47 1,339.47 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST17 USDCHF 4 10 3,275.24 19 36.84% 14,047.29 760.00 114.00 4.43% (82.36) 3,507.97 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST17 USDJPY 4 139,150.14 53 62.26% 10,504.03 2,120.00 318.00 5.45% 220.01 2,827.67 0.16 0.15 YES YES
ST18 AUDUSD 3 13,338.00 42 38.10% 16,524.00 1,680.00 252.00 0.78% (169.20) 1,206.53 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST18 EURUSD 3 19,762.00 10 50.00% 5,741.00 400.00 65.00 5.04% 498.43 2,932.94 0.12 -0.08 YES YES
ST18 GBPJPY 3 (35,512.38) 17 29.41% 47,256.77 2,040.00 144.50 -8.49% (1,179.09) 3,431.66 -0.29 -0.08 NO NO
ST18 GBPUSD 3 78,160.50 67 4 1.79% 31,185.00 2,680.00 569.50 3.61% 1,084.92 5,595.00 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST18 USDCAD 3 31,501.13 30 63.33% 1,682.86 1,800.00 180.00 1.71% 99.93 999.09 0.13 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 46/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST18 USDCHF 3 116,674.22 105 47.62% 18,762.49 4,200.00 630.00 4.83% 1,055.83 3,531.81 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST18 USDJPY 3 146,591.64 203 40.39% 18,965.30 8,120.00 1,218.00 5.64% 9.69 3,264.54 0.18 0.15 YES YES
ST19 AUDUSD 5 13,876.00 24 33.33% 10,6 92.00 960.00 144.00 0.81% (6.35) 1,413.04 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST19 EURUSD 5 12,618.00 8 75.00% 3,619.50 320.00 52.00 3.32% 467.33 2,373.61 0.13 -0.08 YES YES
ST19 GBPJPY 5 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST19 GBPUSD 5 129,551.50 21 57.14% 30,869.50 840.00 178.50 5.19% 1,205.23 8,578.48 0.12 0.15 NO YES
ST19 USDCAD 5 (563.82) 86 39.53% 26,639.55 5,160.00 516.00 -0.04% (302.75) 1,148.66 -0.15 0.15 NO NO
ST19 USDCHF 5 11,384.20 48 33.3 3% 41,323.25 1,920.00 288.00 0.67% 682.52 4,447.52 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST19 USDJPY 5 56,563.75 24 54.17% 11,196.04 960.00 144.00 2.80% 549.33 3,384.96 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST20 AUDUSD 3 10,582.00 43 41.86% 19,886.00 1,720.00 258.00 0.63% (169.20) 1,206.53 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST20 EURUSD 3 18,309.50 9 55.56% 6,476.50 360.00 58.50 4.70% 469.06 2,845.06 0.11 -0.08 YES YES
ST20 GBPJPY 3 (42,262.86) 16 18.75% 52,061.34 1,920.00 136.00 -9.84% (1,233.22) 4,799.91 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST20 GBPUSD 3 82,559.00 66 45.45% 30,785.00 2,640.00 561.00 3.76% 1,126.17 5,591.23 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST20 USDCAD 3 28,964.61 26 61.54% 1,682.86 1,560.00 156.00 1.59% 54.13 1,001.62 0.12 0.15 NO YES
ST20 USDCHF 3 118,975.21 112 44.64% 15,065.36 4,480.00 672.00 4.90% 730.35 3,530.58 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST20 USDJPY 3 141,962.59 214 41.59% 17,725.31 8,560.00 1,284.00 5.52% (55.59) 3,172.19 0.18 0.15 YES YES
ST21 AUDUSD 5 11,848.00 22 31.82% 13,680.00 880.00 132.00 0.70% (25.85) 1,416.82 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST21 EURUSD 5 4,424.00 4 7 5.00% 3,196.50 160. 00 26.00 1.21% 368.67 3,010.58 0.08 -0.08 YES YES
ST21 GBPJPY 5 (21, 294.92) 3 0.00% 21,294.92 360.00 25.50 -5.39% (2,354.70) 4,794.59 -0.52 -0.08 NO NO
ST21 GBPUSD 5 (14,242.50 ) 5 40.00% 41,995.50 200.00 42.50 -0.83% (238.51) 4,658.83 -0.06 0.15 NO NO
ST21 USDCAD 5 (12,154.30) 24 29.17% 19,141.14 1,440.00 144.00 -0.72% (4.96) 1,278.77 -0.13 0.15 NO NO
ST21 USDCHF 5 41,400.46 15 60.00% 11,471.53 600.00 90.00 2.16% 478.61 3,362.60 0.15 0.15 YES YES
ST21 USDJPY 5 122,330.47 27 51.8 5% 8,802.58 1,080.00 162.00 4.99% 140.92 2,679.56 0.13 0.15 NO YES
ST22 AUDUSD 1 5,026.00 14 28.57% 18,4 42.00 560.00 84.00 0.31% (104.85) 1,560.98 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST22 EURUSD 1 (5,797.00) 18 11.1 1% 22,134.50 720.00 117.00 -1.57% (23.85) 3,025.90 -0.09 -0.08 NO NO
ST22 GBPJPY 1 (51,676.38) 14 14.29% 52,766.21 1,680.00 119.00 -11.63% (1,415.20) 4,628.82 -0.24 -0.08 NO NO
ST22 GBPUSD 1 91,893.50 9 66.67% 31,291.00 360.00 76.50 4.07% (749.85) 7,335.40 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST22 USDCAD 1 29,924.09 10 40.00% 8,742.81 600.00 60.00 1.64% 111.01 1,268.18 0 0.15 NO YES
ST22 USDCHF 1 40,288.31 14 3 5.71% 31,149.79 560.00 84.00 2.12% (1,255.65) 3,478.08 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST22 USDJPY 1 78,797.59 10 40.00% 17,453.03 400.00 60.00 3.63% (105.63) 2,818.72 0.05 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 47/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST23 AUDUSD 1 14,982.00 13 30.77% 11,7 24.00 520.00 78.00 0.87% (92.85) 1,436.05 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST23 EURUSD 1 9,435.00 10 30.00% 9,182.50 400.00 65.00 2.52% 199.29 2,927.88 0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST23 GBPJPY 1 1,691.87 4 25.00% 11,985.24 480.00 34.00 0.47% (233.21) 4,843.19 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST23 GBPUSD 1 71,748.00 12 33.33% 77,888.00 480.00 102.00 3.38% (1,714.77) 7,296.39 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST23 USDCAD 1 17,130.74 29 2 0.69% 14,263.65 1,740.00 174.00 0.99% 101.44 1,318.34 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST23 USDCHF 1 72,314.15 16 43.75% 22,907.23 640.00 96.00 3.40% (568.33) 3,671.07 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST23 USDJPY 1 107,997.92 9 44.44% 9,957.04 360.00 54.00 4.58% 123.93 2,877.41 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST24 AUDUSD 1 (12,764.00 ) 14 21.4 3% 30,082.00 560.00 84.00 -0.75% (92.35) 1,488.60 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST24 EURUSD 1 6,454.50 7 28.57% 11,346.00 280.00 45.50 1.75% 233.61 2,805.15 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST24 GBPJPY 1 (79,341.50) 45 22.22% 93,052.27 5,400.00 382.50 -16.31% (2,072.38) 4,495.68 -0.31 -0.08 NO NO
ST24 GBPUSD 1 105,403.50 9 66.67% 27,212.50 360.00 76.50 4.50% (1,386.14) 7,310.08 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST24 USDCAD 1 16,162.87 22 31.82% 10,129.88 1,320.00 132.00 0.94% 55.29 1,382.26 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST24 USDCHF 1 38,934.35 8 50.00% 27,213.06 320.00 48.00 2.05% (828.42) 3,976.70 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST24 USDJPY 1 94,051.01 12 41.67% 20,718.13 480.00 72.00 4.14% (231.65) 2,723.98 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST25 AUDUSD 2 (15,126.00) 26 30.77% 24,292.00 1,040.00 156.00 -0.88% (226.15) 1,406.53 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST25 EURUSD 2 3,033.50 21 33.33% 15,632.50 840.00 136.50 0.83% 76.48 2,859.12 -0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST25 GBPJPY 2 (33,681.41 ) 8 12.50% 33,681.41 960.00 68.00 -8.11% (911.62) 5,041.86 -0.19 -0.08 NO NO
ST25 GBPUSD 2 119,488.00 12 5 8.33% 38,547.00 480.00 102.00 4.91% (953.35) 6,855.48 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST25 USDCAD 2 9,942.98 8 37.50% 16,112.32 480.00 48.00 0.59% 172.25 1,260.06 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST25 USDCHF 2 (294.16) 6 33.33% 39,762.76 240.00 36.00 -0.02% (1,455.68) 3,384.09 -0.05 0.15 NO NO
ST25 USDJPY 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 0.15
ST26 AUDUSD 2 18,342.00 23 39.1 3% 18,214.00 920.00 138.00 1.05% (188.65) 1,472.67 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST26 EURUSD 2 5,878.00 8 37.50% 11,626.00 320.00 52.00 1.59% 228.45 2,847.58 -0.03 -0.08 YES YES
ST26 GBPJPY 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST26 GBPUSD 2 115,605.50 17 4 1.18% 42,659.50 680.00 144.50 4.80% (328.56) 6,541.97 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST26 USDCAD 2 14,893.98 25 36.00% 12,307.88 1,500.00 150.00 0.87% 18.92 1,332.37 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST26 USDCHF 2 36,791.76 10 4 0.00% 28,820.77 400.00 60.00 1.96% (1,131.67) 3,577.27 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST26 USDJPY 2 110,062.02 8 50.00% 9,684.03 320.00 48.00 4.64% 118.36 2,888.33 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST27 AUDUSD 2 35,406.00 24 50.00% 5,144.00 960.00 144.00 1.89% 132.25 1,450.67 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST27 EURUSD 2 10,051.50 9 33.33% 8,566.00 360.00 58.50 2.67% 214.70 2,810.34 0.03 -0.08 YES YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 48/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST27 GBPJPY 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
ST27 GBPUSD 2 82,891.00 14 42.86% 80,498.00 560.00 119.00 3.77% (1,687.78) 7,091.43 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST27 USDCAD 2 15,673.57 18 33.33% 12,314.93 1,080.00 108.00 0.91% 99.48 1,366.01 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST27 USDCHF 2 74,142.46 16 43.75% 21,239.59 640.00 96.00 3.47% (508.21) 3,691.92 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST27 USDJPY 2 91,222.25 11 36.36% 14,008.34 440.00 66.00 4.05% 105.34 2,915.36 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST28 AUDUSD 2 22,152.00 28 3 9.29% 16,842.00 1,120.00 168.00 1.25% (96.15) 1,496.74 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST28 EURUSD 2 (11,897.00) 18 11.11% 27,994.50 720.00 117.00 -3.14% (75.26) 3,191.19 -0.11 -0.08 NO NO
ST28 GBPJPY 2 (55,440.52) 43 30.23% 75,315.04 5,160.00 365.50 -12.32% (1,584.95) 4,731.41 -0.22 -0.08 NO NO
ST28 GBPUSD 2 86,196.50 11 54.5 5% 51,029.50 440.00 93.50 3.88% (1,156.56) 7,210.00 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST28 USDCAD 2 10,167.49 30 40.00% 9,834.14 1,800.00 180.00 0.60% (87.03) 1,206.56 -0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST28 USDCHF 2 40,062.52 11 5 4.55% 35,739.47 440.00 66.00 2.11% (1,384.60) 3,507.69 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST28 USDJPY 2 83,557.62 8 62.50% 13,849.94 320.00 48.00 3.79% (70.21) 2,925.13 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST29 AUDUSD 3 (1,182.00) 27 22.22% 27,562.00 1,080.00 162.00 -0.07% (153.85) 1,600.73 -0.06 0.15 NO NO
ST29 EURUSD 3 (18,431.00) 54 20.37% 22,799.00 2,160.00 351.00 -4.72% (428.03) 3,547.66 -0.15 -0.08 NO NO
ST29 GBPJPY 3 (33,681.41 ) 8 12.50% 33,681.41 960.00 68.00 -8.11% (911.62) 5,041.86 -0.19 -0.08 NO NO
ST29 GBPUSD 3 119,488.00 12 5 8.33% 38,547.00 480.00 102.00 4.91% (953.35) 6,855.48 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST29 USDCAD 3 (597.76) 24 33.33% 10,941.72 1,440.00 144.00 -0.04% 179.85 1,257.19 -0.1 0.15 NO NO
ST29 USDCHF 3 81,356.43 41 36.59% 21,242.65 1,640.00 246.00 3.72% 84.30 3,881.12 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST29 USDJPY 3 174,2 09.52 55 56.36% 6,640.89 2,200.00 330.00 6.30% 336.48 2,660.94 0.2 0.15 YES YES
ST30 AUDUSD 1 (11,322.00) 17 23.53% 27,774.00 680.00 102.00 -0.67% (369.40) 2,379.10 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST30 EURUSD 1 1,554.50 7 28.57% 14,916.00 280. 00 45.50 0.43% 25.28 2,492.36 -0.04 -0.08 YES YES
ST30 GBPJPY 1 (39,203.27) 12 16.67% 39,203.27 1,440.00 102.00 -9.24% (1,335.40) 4,059.20 -0.36 -0.08 NO NO
ST30 GBPUSD 1 28,783.50 9 77.78% 60,175.50 360.00 76.50 1.58% (1,814.17) 7,110.27 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST30 USDCAD 1 16,179.58 30 40.00% 5,878.52 1,800.00 180.00 0.94% (40.44) 1,134.65 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST30 USDCHF 1 38,161.67 7 42.86% 46,099.94 280.00 42.00 2.02% (1,386.22) 3,161.72 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST30 USDJPY 1 62,755.91 11 45.45% 15,293.32 440.00 66.00 3.04% (326.18) 2,826.20 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST31 AUDUSD 1 26,212.00 23 34.78% 10,186.00 920.00 138.00 1.45% (58.75) 1,322.56 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST31 EURUSD 1 5,554.50 7 28.5 7% 8,576.50 280.00 45.50 1.51% 62.94 3,165.41 -0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST31 GBPJPY 1 (14,345.92) 9 22.22% 14,345.92 1,080.00 76.50 -3.74% (260.74) 4,397.98 -0.07 -0.08 YES NO
ST31 GBPUSD 1 67,688.00 12 41.67% 80,169.50 480.00 102.00 3.23% (1,980.03) 6,736.41 0.05 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 49/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST31 USDCAD 1 26,057.69 17 29.41% 7,503.38 1,020.00 102.00 1.45% 184.03 1,234.58 0 0.15 NO YES
ST31 USDCHF 1 9,966.70 9 44.44% 3 8,853.66 360.00 54.00 0.59% (1,039.75) 3,599.06 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST31 USDJPY 1 97,683.34 10 40.00% 7,047.21 400.00 60.00 4.26% (56.73) 2,686.19 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST32 AUDUSD 1 (33,914.00) 34 32.35% 39,078.00 1,360.00 204.00 -1.82% (509.10) 1,345.75 -0.15 0.15 NO NO
ST32 EURUSD 1 10,198.00 8 25.00% 12,999.00 320.00 52.00 2.71% 267.91 2,564.80 0.05 -0.08 YES YES
ST32 GBPJPY 1 (19,200.03 ) 6 16.67% 19,200.03 720.00 51.00 -4.90% (642.39) 4,187.42 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST32 GBPUSD 1 8,465.00 10 50.00% 67,375.50 400.00 85.00 0.51% (1,713.21) 7,486.71 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST32 USDCAD 1 24,657.21 17 47.06% 8,453.16 1,020.00 102.00 1.38% 112.35 1,270.84 0 0.15 NO YES
ST32 USDCHF 1 51,272.36 10 50.00% 15,184.09 400.00 60.00 2.59% (733.86) 3,173.88 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST32 USDJPY 1 53,156.10 8 50.00% 27,176.22 320.00 48.00 2.66% (18.52) 2,764.15 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST33 AUDUSD 2 1,324.00 16 31.25% 14,9 64.00 640.00 96.00 0.08% (263.00) 1,302.65 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST33 EURUSD 2 7,560.50 3 6 6.67% 5,886.50 120. 00 19.50 2.04% 174.29 3,371.19 0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST33 GBPJPY 2 (30,831.01) 9 22.22% 30,831.01 1,080.00 76.50 -7.50% (823.40) 4,584.47 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST33 GBPUSD 2 15,656.50 11 27.27% 94,811.00 440.00 93.50 0.91% (2,770.24) 6,131.38 0 0.15 NO YES
ST33 USDCAD 2 10,905.59 7 57.14% 11,291.34 420.00 42.00 0.65% 121.86 1,276.98 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST33 USDCHF 2 (4,564.20) 8 25.00% 60,061.57 320.00 48.00 -0.28% (1,558.03) 3,394.88 -0.07 0.15 NO NO
ST33 USDJPY 2 111,451.21 23 60.87% 8,977.83 920.00 138.00 4.68% 469.41 2,850.63 0.14 0.15 NO YES
ST34 AUDUSD 2 4,168.00 17 29.41% 22,134.00 680.00 102.00 0.26% (498.15) 2,104.05 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST34 EURUSD 2 7,931.00 6 50.00% 13,369.50 240.00 39.00 2.13% 273.48 2,734.49 0.05 -0.08 YES YES
ST34 GBPJPY 2 (34,840.26) 13 23.08% 36,422.45 1,560.00 110.50 -8.35% (1,198.46) 4,265.15 -0.33 -0.08 NO NO
ST34 GBPUSD 2 14,309.00 6 50.00% 53,497.00 240.00 51.00 0.84% (1,548.28) 6,097.55 0 0.15 NO YES
ST34 USDCAD 2 16,596.05 24 50.00% 5,270.66 1,440.00 144.00 0.96% 121.38 1,323.51 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST34 USDCHF 2 32,879.14 7 28.57% 16,486.80 280.00 42.00 1.78% (97.79) 3,484.62 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST34 USDJPY 2 48,210.29 10 20.00% 32,099.41 400.00 60.00 2.46% (164.97) 2,808.73 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST35 AUDUSD 2 7,984.00 16 37.50% 10,550.00 640.00 96.00 0.48% (71.35) 2,419.80 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST35 EURUSD 2 6,354.50 7 28.5 7% 8,876.00 280.00 45.50 1.72% 98.36 3,077.79 -0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST35 GBPJPY 2 (1,353.57) 2 50.00% 11,071.43 240.00 17.00 -0.38% (123.81) 4,328.38 -0.05 -0.08 YES NO
ST35 GBPUSD 2 83,347.50 5 60.00% 30,447.00 200.00 42.50 3.79% (865.60) 7,077.44 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST35 USDCAD 2 23,836.00 12 50.00% 8,167.96 720.00 72.00 1.34% 184.57 1,249.73 0 0.15 NO YES
ST35 USDCHF 2 46,557.20 10 30.00% 26,176.55 400.00 60.00 2.39% (513.41) 3,927.27 0.05 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 50/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST35 USDJPY 2 86,606.31 9 44.44% 10,534.70 360.00 54.00 3.90% (194.53) 2,893.47 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST36 AUDUSD 2 31,838.00 12 33.33% 6,128.00 480.00 72.00 1.73% 86.35 2,390.68 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST36 EURUSD 2 13,170.50 3 100.00% - 120.00 19.50 3.45% 627.17 2,987.94 0.17 -0.08 YES YES
ST36 GBPJPY 2 (20,862.52) 12 16.67% 22,181.82 1,440.00 102.00 -5.29% (832.36) 4,174.36 -0.23 -0.08 NO NO
ST36 GBPUSD 2 11,866.50 11 45.45% 16,352.50 440.00 93.50 0.70% 234.44 5,847.70 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST36 USDCAD 2 23,689.78 13 53.85% 5,812.94 780.00 78.00 1.33% 62.04 1,242.27 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST36 USDCHF 2 60,834.60 6 50.00% 8,800.26 240.00 36.00 2.97% (421.53) 3,898.15 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST36 USDJPY 2 58,295.95 8 50.00% 28,504.24 320.00 48.00 2.87% 15.80 2,714.24 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST37 AUDUSD 3 (3,490.00) 10 20.0 0% 24,694.00 400.00 60.00 -0.21% (720.25) 2,152.86 -0.06 0.15 NO NO
ST37 EURUSD 3 12,152.50 15 33.33% 5,742.50 600.00 97.50 3.20% 714.85 2,937.01 0.2 -0.08 YES YES
ST37 GBPJPY 3 (57,409.52) 10 10.00% 57,409.52 1,200.00 85.00 -12.67% (1,316.82) 3,936.23 -0.27 -0.08 NO NO
ST37 GBPUSD 3 44,932.00 8 37.50% 71,692.50 320.00 68.00 2.32% (1,780.42) 6,501.90 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST37 USDCAD 3 9,254.65 4 50.00% 4,120.87 240.00 24.00 0.55% (23.84) 991.79 -0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST37 USDCHF 3 16,877.08 7 42.86% 25,173.49 280.00 42.00 0.97% (1,057.90) 3,650.13 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST37 USDJPY 3 95,305.79 19 63.16% 7,119.82 760.00 114.00 4.18% 443.45 2,953.51 0.12 0.15 NO YES
ST38 AUDUSD 4 6,844.00 26 3 4.62% 22,374.00 1,040.00 156.00 0.41% (319.40) 1,505.31 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST38 EURUSD 4 (2,923.00) 22 40.91% 15,055.00 880.00 143.00 -0.80% 12.66 2,944.86 -0.07 -0.08 YES NO
ST38 GBPJPY 4 (31,077.32) 19 26.32% 32,200.28 2,280.00 161.50 -7.56% (1,138.28) 4,571.07 -0.25 -0.08 NO NO
ST38 GBPUSD 4 148,199.00 26 46.15% 37,092.50 1,040.00 221.00 5.68% 312.80 7,538.70 0.13 0.15 NO YES
ST38 USDCAD 4 905.88 29 37.93% 13,9 32.63 1,740.00 174.00 0.06% (52.77) 1,018.60 -0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST38 USDCHF 4 20,978.51 19 52.63% 17,739.93 760.00 114.00 1.19% (411.70) 4,004.81 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST38 USDJPY 4 93,163.02 24 50.00% 14,610.64 960.00 144.00 4.11% 70.24 2,874.28 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST39 AUDUSD 4 854.00 31 25.81% 31,168.00 1,240.00 186.00 0.05% (387.80) 1,975.08 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST39 EURUSD 4 20,542.50 15 46.67% 8,792.00 600.00 97.50 5.22% 455.14 2,712.92 0.09 -0.08 YES YES
ST39 GBPJPY 4 3,183.39 11 45.45% 11,026.94 1,320.00 93.50 0.88% (54.32) 4,060.20 0 -0.08 YES YES
ST39 GBPUSD 4 82,627.50 25 44.0 0% 13,855.50 1,000.00 212.50 3.76% 569.98 6,042.99 0.21 0.15 YES YES
ST39 USDCAD 4 (18,628.50) 28 28.57% 25,966.36 1,680.00 168.00 -1.07% 121.22 1,254.90 -0.15 0.15 NO NO
ST39 USDCHF 4 89,769.17 40 62.5 0% 15,533.39 1,600.00 240.00 4.00% 437.66 3,085.33 0.12 0.15 NO YES
ST39 USDJPY 4 10 9,226.20 23 60.87% 12,950.40 920.00 138.00 4.61% 187.83 2,782.03 0.12 0.15 NO YES
ST40 AUDUSD 4 (43,152.00) 47 27.66% 51,504.00 1,880.00 282.00 -2.24% (449.05) 2,178.32 -0.17 0.15 NO NO
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 51/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 4
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST40 EURUSD 4 (1,325.00) 10 40.00% 15,8 73.00 400.00 65.00 -0.37% 25.20 2,828.64 -0.07 -0.08 YES NO
ST40 GBPJPY 4 (24,725.35) 11 36.36% 27,977.67 1,320.00 93.50 -6.17% (1,046.30) 4,476.09 -0.23 -0.08 NO NO
ST40 GBPUSD 4 48,737.00 18 55.56% 10,847.00 720.00 153.00 2.48% 599.95 5,618.64 0.11 0.15 NO YES
ST40 USDCAD 4 11,434.09 24 58.33% 7,625.28 1,440.00 144.00 0.68% (99.29) 983.47 -0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST40 USDCHF 4 72,986.56 20 60.00% 9,615.55 800.00 120.00 3.42% 642.16 3,137.12 0.18 0.15 YES YES
ST40 USDJPY 4 96,620.30 29 48.2 8% 10,783.84 1,160.00 174.00 4.22% 216.03 2,694.03 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST41 AUDUSD 4 16,470.00 50 3 6.00% 13,348.00 2,000.00 300.00 0.95% (81.45) 1,694.63 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST41 EURUSD 4 10,735.00 30 43.3 3% 13,920.50 1,200.00 195.00 2.85% 589.06 2,726.17 0.03 -0.08 YES YES
ST41 GBPJPY 4 (39,589.33) 27 22.22% 46,243.93 3,240.00 229.50 -9.31% (1,054.50) 3,783.36 -0.26 -0.08 NO NO
ST41 GBPUSD 4 84,263.00 42 45.24% 52,585.50 1,680.00 357.00 3.82% (696.99) 6,849.40 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST41 USDCAD 4 5,531.13 58 44.83% 9,332.16 3,480.00 348.00 0.34% 194.58 1,323.94 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST41 USDCHF 4 32,391.73 196 49.49% 14,693.67 7,840.00 1,176.00 1.75% 901.69 3,141.07 0.16 0.15 YES YES
ST41 USDJPY 4 94,434.51 52 44.2 3% 17,587.33 2,080.00 312.00 4.15% 263.76 2,946.18 0.08 0.15 NO YES
ST42 AUDUSD 1 (28,142.00) 102 27.45% 33,940.00 4,080.00 612.00 -1.55% (266.05) 1,545.52 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST42 EURUSD 1 (8,848.00) 12 16.67% 8,981.50 480.00 78.00 -2.37% (589.87) 1,746.19 -0.43 -0.08 NO NO
ST42 GBPJPY 1 (27,486.89) 92 18.48% 34,468.08 11,040.00 782.00 -6.78% (616.64) 4,342.23 -0.13 -0.08 NO NO
ST42 GBPUSD 1 (171,602.00) 332 39.76% 175,261.00 13,280.00 2,822.00 -6.24% (874.72) 7,187.58 0.02 0.15 NO NO
ST42 USDCAD 1 (22,481.05) 11 27.27% 22,849.83 660.00 66.00 -1.27% (186.50) 1,259.62 -0.16 0.15 NO NO
ST42 USDCHF 1 84,537.08 44 25.0 0% 18,061.91 1,760.00 264.00 3.83% (57.12) 3,642.15 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST42 USDJPY 1 82,858.01 77 33.7 7% 10,253.50 3,080.00 462.00 3.77% (45.98) 3,117.26 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST43 AUDUSD 1 (47,462.00) 237 36.29% 47,596.00 9,480.00 1,422.00 -2.43% (97.50) 1,259.48 -0.3 0.15 NO NO
ST43 EURUSD 1 (660.50) 17 35.29% 3,981.00 680.00 110.50 -0.18% (55.04) 1,105.85 -0.19 -0.08 NO NO
ST43 GBPJPY 1 (4,949.82) 21 23.81% 13,428.00 2,520.00 178.50 -1.35% (599.96) 4,623.89 -0.15 -0.08 NO NO
ST43 GBPUSD 1 (85,555.00) 130 37.69% 87,624.50 5,200.00 1,105.00 -3.86% (2,112.25) 4,542.71 -0.4 0.15 NO NO
ST43 USDCAD 1 (8,064.45) 118 38.14% 10,356.63 7,080.00 708.00 -0.48% (188.56) 760.73 -0.38 0.15 NO NO
ST43 USDCHF 1 (34,012.55) 389 45.76% 48,971.39 15,560.00 2,334.00 -1.83% (522.72) 2,017.60 -0.16 0.15 NO NO
ST43 USDJPY 1 22,343.78 437 45.08% 14,909.37 17,480.00 2,622.00 1.26% 21.74 2,412.84 0 0.15 NO YES
ST44 AUDUSD 2 (4,770.00) 5 40.00% 4,924.00 200.00 30.00 -0.29% (162.42) 1,879.63 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST44 EURUSD 2 (6,846.00) 4 0.00% 6,846.00 160.00 26.00 -1.85% (978.00) 2,474.38 -0.46 -0.08 NO NO
ST44 GBPJPY 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 -0.08
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 52/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST44 GBPUSD 2 (2,241.00) 6 16.67% 19,7 94.00 240.00 51.00 -0.14% (83.00) 5,272.47 -0.02 0.15 NO NO
ST44 USDCAD 2 (6,633.44) 6 16.67% 6,633.44 360.00 36.00 -0.40% 135.56 1,328.09 -0.09 0.15 NO NO
ST44 USDCHF 2 (59,102.61) 267 3 8.58% 77,988.02 10,680.00 1,602.00 -2.90% (330.94) 3,093.19 -0.1 0.15 NO NO
ST44 USDJPY 2 3,609.37 2 50.00% 6,932.04 80.00 12.00 0.22% 184.50 3,209.36 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST45 AUDUSD 1 (15,920.00) 880 39.89% 47,442.00 35,200.00 5,280.00 -0.92% (499.30) 1,555.76 -0.13 0.15 NO NO
ST45 EURUSD 1 (39,928.50) 229 33.19% 44,536.50 9,160.00 1,488.50 -9.38% (650.40) 3,486.92 -0.24 -0.08 NO NO
ST45 GBPJPY 1 (38,136.29) 235 36.60% 44,412.69 28,200.00 1,997.50 -9.02% (464.80) 4,974.80 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST45 GBPUSD 1 (129,040.00) 1380 43.12% 157,015.50 55,200.00 11,730.00 -5.18% (1,133.83) 8,502.83 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST45 USDCAD 1 (82,947.51) 1034 37.04% 84,564.18 62,040.00 6,204.00 -3.77% (310.36) 1,112.86 -0.35 0.15 NO NO
ST45 USDCHF 1 (46,598.52) 1027 44.79% 88,801.52 41,080.00 6,162.00 -2.39% (1,544.03) 3,252.97 -0.13 0.15 NO NO
ST45 USDJPY 1 42,307.78 987 43.67% 32,044.58 39,480.00 5,922.00 2.20% 202.74 3,255.13 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST46 AUDUSD 2 13,334.00 21 47.62% 15,678.00 840.00 126.00 0.78% (71.15) 1,521.22 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST46 EURUSD 2 (28,512.00 ) 8 25.00% 28,512.00 320.00 52.00 -7.00% (813.21) 2,741.22 -0.35 -0.08 NO NO
ST46 GBPJPY 2 (7,938.20) 9 55.56% 21,773.57 1,080.00 76.50 -2.13% (161.28) 5,095.26 -0.04 -0.08 YES NO
ST46 GBPUSD 2 (27,051.50) 19 36.84% 127,699.00 760.00 161.50 -1.50% (2,671.14) 6,920.28 -0.11 0.15 NO NO
ST46 USDCAD 2 (32,886.92) 31 22.58% 33,209.15 1,860.00 186.00 -1.78% (40.35) 1,161.19 -0.22 0.15 NO NO
ST46 USDCHF 2 19,738.77 11 4 5.45% 27,606.73 440.00 66.00 1.13% (1,162.80) 3,587.08 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST46 USDJPY 2 (25,388.54) 65 40.00% 65,670.19 2,600.00 390.00 -1.41% 379.26 2,932.38 -0.03 0.15 NO NO
ST47 AUDUSD 2 (1,882.00) 22 31.8 2% 21,280.00 880.00 132.00 -0.12% (11.85) 1,480.20 -0.05 0.15 NO NO
ST47 EURUSD 2 13,191.00 6 33.33% 7,086.50 240.00 39.00 3.46% 373.19 2,966.23 0.08 -0.08 YES YES
ST47 GBPJPY 2 (35,625.08) 18 27.78% 43,435.98 2,160.00 153.00 -8.51% (1,247.05) 4,804.99 -0.19 -0.08 NO NO
ST47 GBPUSD 2 123,4 83.50 9 44.44% 52,104.00 360.00 76.50 5.02% (1,433.85) 6,955.01 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST47 USDCAD 2 (17,533.74) 42 26.19% 26,205.48 2,520.00 252.00 -1.01% (214.79) 1,011.71 -0.19 0.15 NO NO
ST47 USDCHF 2 70,567.31 116 43.97% 2 9,334.97 4,640.00 696.00 3.34% 227.09 4,202.08 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST47 USDJPY 2 71,362.95 8 37.50% 15,205.68 320.00 48.00 3.37% (167.66) 2,827.91 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST48 AUDUSD 2 (5,448.00) 23 39.13% 18,460.00 920.00 138.00 -0.33% (197.15) 1,445.80 -0.06 0.15 NO NO
ST48 EURUSD 2 (22,608.50 ) 9 33.33% 22,608.50 360.00 58.50 -5.69% (412.71) 2,584.78 -0.27 -0.08 NO NO
ST48 GBPJPY 2 (40,549.44) 22 18.18% 44,518.57 2,640.00 187.00 -9.51% (936.48) 5,115.08 -0.17 -0.08 NO NO
ST48 GBPUSD 2 43,942.50 35 54.2 9% 59,897.00 1,400.00 297.50 2.28% 142.72 7,468.65 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST48 USDCAD 2 (36,089.27) 29 24.14% 36,089.27 1,740.00 174.00 -1.93% (180.01) 1,329.05 -0.2 0.15 NO NO
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 53/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST48 USDCHF 2 40,449.65 11 54.55% 28,239.90 440.00 66.00 2.12% (858.63) 3,696.63 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST48 USDJPY 2 (16,485.30) 57 42.11% 61,676.92 2,280.00 342.00 -0.95% 523.97 2,713.34 -0.02 0.15 NO NO
ST49 AUDUSD 3 29,542.00 133 35.34% 1 1,616.00 5,320.00 798.00 1.62% (43.75) 1,449.93 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST49 EURUSD 3 23,245.50 13 84.62% 4,919.50 520.00 84.50 5.84% 708.35 3,118.80 0.19 -0.08 YES YES
ST49 GBPJPY 3 (42,601.56) 11 54.55% 46,979.71 1,320.00 93.50 -9.91% (1,044.61) 4,522.56 -0.22 -0.08 NO NO
ST49 GBPUSD 3 (17,524.50) 17 41.18% 61,424.00 680.00 144.50 -1.01% (918.85) 7,144.90 0.01 0.15 NO NO
ST49 USDCAD 3 (17,564.55) 40 37.50% 20,977.68 2,400.00 240.00 -1.01% (18.46) 1,335.13 -0.15 0.15 NO NO
ST49 USDCHF 3 16,602.12 16 37.50% 45,538.77 640.00 96.00 0.96% (640.31) 3,696.14 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST49 USDJPY 3 78,000.43 45 44.44% 17,861.64 1,800.00 270.00 3.60% (340.60) 2,543.40 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST50 AUDUSD 2 1,692.00 18 38.89% 20,940.00 720.00 108.00 0.10% (188.75) 1,439.36 -0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST50 EURUSD 2 (14,285.50 ) 7 28.57% 18,516.00 280.00 45.50 -3.73% (439.11) 2,251.65 -0.24 -0.08 NO NO
ST50 GBPJPY 2 (5,800.36) 8 37.50% 19,413.07 960.00 68.00 -1.57% (187.67) 4,734.92 -0.05 -0.08 YES NO
ST50 GBPUSD 2 58,496.50 51 62.75% 47,350.50 2,040.00 433.50 2.88% (333.63) 6,248.63 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST50 USDCAD 2 (7,579.03) 23 39.1 3% 16,892.79 1,380.00 138.00 -0.46% 87.43 1,110.82 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST50 USDCHF 2 48,466.55 16 37.50% 30,167.90 640.00 96.00 2.47% (237.91) 3,648.15 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST50 USDJPY 2 58,605.81 40 52.5 0% 10,768.98 1,600.00 240.00 2.88% 548.84 2,747.72 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST51 AUDUSD 2 (10,262.00) 17 23.53% 21,602.00 680.00 102.00 -0.61% (52.35) 1,416.18 -0.07 0.15 NO NO
ST51 EURUSD 2 9,471.00 6 33.33% 10,846.50 240.00 39.00 2.53% 155.84 3,044.67 0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST51 GBPJPY 2 (28,211.69) 15 33.33% 36,870.30 1,800.00 127.50 -6.94% (872.23) 4,115.20 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST51 GBPUSD 2 66,860.50 7 42.86% 56,395.50 280.00 59.50 3.20% (1,215.60) 7,373.61 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST51 USDCAD 2 (4,096.46) 33 36.36% 15,975.44 1,980.00 198.00 -0.25% (177.35) 1,063.48 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST51 USDCHF 2 35,791.37 12 33.33% 29,123.54 480. 00 72.00 1.91% (827.12) 3,600.52 0 0.15 NO YES
ST51 USDJPY 2 72,258.21 41 56.10% 15,6 83.26 1,640.00 246.00 3.40% 78.94 2,722.55 0.1 0.15 NO YES
ST52 AUDUSD 2 (8,878.00) 18 33.33% 25,444.00 720.00 108.00 -0.53% (197.00) 1,392.18 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST52 EURUSD 2 (24,268.50 ) 9 22.22% 24,268.50 360.00 58.50 -6.07% (605.43) 2,279.50 -0.31 -0.08 NO NO
ST52 GBPJPY 2 (36, 503.51) 9 22.22% 45,200.42 1,080.00 76.50 -8.69% (874.68) 4,672.39 -0.2 -0.08 NO NO
ST52 GBPUSD 2 28,393.50 29 51.72% 76,060.50 1,160.00 246.50 1.56% (148.49) 7,274.80 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST52 USDCAD 2 (23,662.17) 44 27.27% 23,824.57 2,640.00 264.00 -1.33% (183.75) 1,304.22 -0.22 0.15 NO NO
ST52 USDCHF 2 102,209.43 27 40.74% 21,714.44 1,080.00 162.00 4.40% 325.77 3,370.16 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST52 USDJPY 2 57,982.31 43 51.1 6% 26,565.99 1,720.00 258.00 2.86% 424.98 2,712.22 0.06 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 54/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST53 AUDUSD 3 31,420.00 55 41.82% 17,916.00 2,200.00 330.00 1.71% 14.77 1,374.98 0 0.15 NO YES
ST53 EURUSD 3 9,015.00 10 80.00% 8,916.50 400.00 65.00 2.41% 345.80 3,152.88 0.07 -0.08 YES YES
ST53 GBPJPY 3 (44,064.60) 7 0.00% 44,064.60 840.00 59.50 -10.19% (1,331.33) 4,207.59 -0.29 -0.08 NO NO
ST53 GBPUSD 3 (638.00) 8 50.00% 95,214.00 320.00 68.00 -0.04% (2,221.10) 6,775.45 -0.02 0.15 NO NO
ST53 USDCAD 3 (12,378.11) 21 38.10% 19,164.12 1,260.00 126.00 -0.73% 146.86 1,285.97 -0.14 0.15 NO NO
ST53 USDCHF 3 5,038.95 6 50.00% 31,569.70 240.00 36.00 0.31% (753.85) 3,370.04 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST53 USDJPY 3 105,354.96 60 46.67% 13,061.75 2,400.00 360.00 4.50% 114.12 2,968.67 0.13 0.15 NO YES
ST54 AUDUSD 2 40,906.00 94 32.98% 12,698.00 3,760.00 564.00 2.14% 43.25 1,386.10 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST54 EURUSD 2 4,541.00 46 28.26% 14,348.50 1,840.00 299.00 1.24% 86.43 3,078.28 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST54 GBPJPY 2 (36,366.90) 52 17.31% 47,223.02 6,240.00 442.00 -8.66% (1,100.09) 4,091.31 -0.19 -0.08 NO NO
ST54 GBPUSD 2 82,180.50 367 36.78% 58,464.00 14,680.00 3,119.50 3.75% 1,271.05 7,508.15 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST54 USDCAD 2 (11,376.47) 142 22.54% 22,990.04 8,520.00 852.00 -0.67% (102.77) 1,383.45 -0.13 0.15 NO NO
ST54 USDCHF 2 134,080.59 108 39.81% 18,546.28 4,320.00 648.00 5.31% 741.55 3,849.77 0.14 0.15 NO YES
ST54 USDJPY 2 138,190.30 145 42.07% 9,712.98 5,800.00 870.00 5.42% 121.82 2,885.26 0.16 0.15 YES YES
ST55 AUDUSD 2 11,130.00 25 36.00% 15,968.00 1,000.00 150.00 0.66% (272.15) 1,540.88 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST55 EURUSD 2 (5,785.50) 7 28.57% 14,846.00 280.00 45.50 -1.57% (41.89) 3,258.82 -0.1 -0.08 NO NO
ST55 GBPJPY 2 25,973.86 29 51.72% 6,014.45 3,480.00 246.50 6.45% 748.51 4,281.70 0.15 -0.08 YES YES
ST55 GBPUSD 2 23,876.50 11 36.36% 114,241.00 440.00 93.50 1.34% (2,333.85) 6,898.56 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST55 USDCAD 2 1,651.29 25 24.00% 14,353.97 1,500.00 150.00 0.10% 58.67 1,370.86 -0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST55 USDCHF 2 34,394.26 15 46.67% 20,691.47 600.00 90.00 1.85% (588.05) 3,828.49 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST55 USDJPY 2 75,192.62 9 44.44% 9,958.32 360.00 54.00 3.50% 102.61 2,911.33 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST56 AUDUSD 2 12,978.00 12 25.00% 11,9 24.00 480.00 72.00 0.76% (97.85) 1,435.38 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST56 EURUSD 2 8,481.00 6 3 3.33% 8,206.50 240. 00 39.00 2.27% 167.27 2,999.01 0.02 -0.08 YES YES
ST56 GBPJPY 2 4,115.99 3 33.3 3% 11,985.24 360. 00 25.50 1.13% (233.21) 4,843.19 0 -0.08 YES YES
ST56 GBPUSD 2 76,689.50 13 46.15% 81,288.00 520.00 110.50 3.56% (1,644.78) 7,175.85 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST56 USDCAD 2 14,005.31 24 2 5.00% 15,119.87 1,440.00 144.00 0.82% 175.23 1,333.82 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST56 USDCHF 2 63,739.57 18 38.89% 28,403.22 720.00 108.00 3.08% (433.22) 3,741.74 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST56 USDJPY 2 95,165.90 10 40.00% 13,574.67 400.00 60.00 4.18% 105.34 2,915.36 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST57 AUDUSD 2 7,958.00 27 3 7.04% 18,388.00 1,080.00 162.00 0.48% (180.65) 1,573.18 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST57 EURUSD 2 6,821.50 9 44.44% 9,096.00 3 60.00 58.50 1.84% 264.29 2,859.48 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 55/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST57 GBPJPY 2 (2,963.73) 2 50.00% 10,433.41 240.00 17.00 -0.82% (161.30) 4,827.08 -0.03 -0.08 YES NO
ST57 GBPUSD 2 89,826.50 11 54.55% 42,138.00 440.00 93.50 4.00% (679.85) 7,490.65 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST57 USDCAD 2 8,017.70 27 40.74% 8,329.64 1,620.00 162.00 0.48% 152.52 1,420.05 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST57 USDCHF 2 37,242.69 15 33.33% 27,759.08 600.00 90.00 1.98% (89.65) 3,844.59 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST57 USDJPY 2 73,849.38 9 33.33% 19,767.81 360.00 54.00 3.46% (337.30) 3,366.59 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST58 AUDUSD 3 (15,202.00) 27 33.33% 22,036.00 1,080.00 162.00 -0.88% (226.15) 1,427.18 -0.08 0.15 NO NO
ST58 EURUSD 3 13,093.00 18 44.44% 7,702.50 720.00 117.00 3.44% 437.99 3,043.33 0.08 -0.08 YES YES
ST58 GBPJPY 3 (34,894.85) 9 55.56% 37,874.79 1,080.00 76.50 -8.36% (837.43) 4,021.05 -0.24 -0.08 NO NO
ST58 GBPUSD 3 82,691.00 14 50.00% 43,801.00 560.00 119.00 3.77% (874.85) 7,298.06 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST58 USDCAD 3 16,676.35 9 66.67% 6,141.58 540.00 54.00 0.96% 167.19 1,262.98 -0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST58 USDCHF 3 6,064.12 10 40.00% 41,922.55 400.00 60.00 0.37% (1,231.18) 3,434.56 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST58 USDJPY 3 84,311.61 14 42.86% 26,928.93 560.00 84.00 3.82% (246.21) 2,940.34 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST59 AUDUSD 2 (7,494.00) 14 35.7 1% 11,380.00 560.00 84.00 -0.45% (222.80) 1,626.94 -0.21 0.15 NO NO
ST59 EURUSD 2 1,881.00 6 50.00% 4,256.50 2 40.00 39.00 0.52% 125.40 2,474.08 -0.01 -0.08 YES YES
ST59 GBPJPY 2 (22,601.25) 239 37.24% 33,227.67 28,680.00 2,031.50 -5.69% (376.58) 2,684.58 -0.21 -0.08 NO NO
ST59 GBPUSD 2 49,880.50 7 57.14% 23,3 97.00 280.00 59.50 2.53% 1,245.16 5,824.05 0.22 0.15 YES YES
ST59 USDCAD 2 3,495.63 6 50.00% 2,120.85 3 60.00 36.00 0.21% 145.48 1,019.11 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST59 USDCHF 2 52,915.27 6 66.67% 12,939.42 240.00 36.00 2.65% 785.51 3,725.99 0.22 0.15 YES YES
ST59 USDJPY 2 28,692.75 10 50.00% 13,703.51 400.00 60.00 1.58% 717.44 3,190.81 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST60 AUDUSD 1 12,234.00 71 19.72% 22,230.00 2,840.00 426.00 0.72% (346.65) 1,894.73 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST60 EURUSD 1 (18,821.50) 71 11.27% 27,587.50 2,840.00 461.50 -4.82% (425.99) 4,007.66 -0.15 -0.08 NO NO
ST60 GBPJPY 1 (47,129.04) 54 11.11% 52,803.39 6,480.00 459.00 -10.78% (1,560.69) 4,914.72 -0.24 -0.08 NO NO
ST60 GBPUSD 1 (17,804.50) 77 25.97% 92,155.50 3,080.00 654.50 -1.02% (1,098.65) 8,359.69 -0.01 0.15 NO NO
ST60 USDCAD 1 32,230.10 18 27.78% 4,522.84 1,080.00 108.00 1.75% 164.32 1,266.27 0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST60 USDCHF 1 13,791.42 65 35.38% 24,725.41 2,600.00 390.00 0.81% (411.66) 3,768.23 -0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST60 USDJPY 1 83,609.82 59 37.2 9% 11,256.87 2,360.00 354.00 3.80% 138.01 2,849.19 0.07 0.15 NO YES
ST61 AUDUSD 2 38,372.00 3 66.67% 7,206.00 120.00 18.00 2.03% (522.40) 1,563.34 -0.02 0.15 NO YES
ST61 EURUSD 2 (14,119.00) 6 16.67% 22,7 96.00 240.00 39.00 -3.69% (83.23) 2,951.52 -0.1 -0.08 NO NO
ST61 GBPJPY 2 5,239.12 2 50.0 0% 12,262.78 240. 00 17.00 1.43% (252.63) 4,928.64 0 -0.08 YES YES
ST61 GBPUSD 2 117,5 60.50 7 42.86% 46,294.00 280.00 59.50 4.86% (1,107.35) 6,097.99 0.1 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 56/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 5
Strategy
Cur-
rency
Com-
plex-
ity
Total Net
Profit
#
trades % Win
Max
Drawdown
Total
Slippage
Total
Commssn
Annual
ROR
Avg. Mth
Rtn
Std. Dev
of Mth
Rtn
Sharpe
Ratio
Sharpe
Benchmark
Strat >
Bench Profita
ST61 USDCAD 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% 0 0 0 0.15
ST61 USDCHF 2 87,814.11 17 35.29% 19,905.97 680.00 102.00 3.94% (383.74) 3,593.33 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST61 USDJPY 2 81,123.97 18 27.78% 35,230.86 720.00 108.00 3.71% 253.97 2,741.28 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST62 AUDUSD 2 29,688.00 2 100.00% - 80.00 12.00 1.62% 189.25 1,448.14 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST62 EURUSD 2 (17,726.00) 4 0.00% 17,726.00 160.00 26.00 -4.56% 387.60 2,869.07 0.05 -0.08 YES NO
ST62 GBPJPY 2 (16,330.16) 4 25.00% 31,692.69 480.00 34.00 -4.22% (661.04) 4,812.60 -0.1 -0.08 NO NO
ST62 GBPUSD 2 (59,878.50) 21 33.33% 85,585.00 840.00 178.50 -2.93% (754.70) 6,759.74 -0.02 0.15 NO NO
ST62 USDCAD 2 24,574.98 2 100.00% - 120.00 12.00 1.37% (73.38) 1,196.91 -0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST62 USDCHF 2 14 2,682.57 21 61.90% 10,795.08 840.00 126.00 5.54% 803.25 3,385.96 0.13 0.15 NO YES
ST62 USDJPY 2 10 3,872.22 18 44.44% 12,581.14 720.00 108.00 4.45% (50.59) 2,890.82 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST63 AUDUSD 2 43,758.00 2 100.00% - 80.00 12.00 2.27% 189.25 1,448.14 0.03 0.15 NO YES
ST63 EURUSD 2 (10,587.00) 18 50.00% 16,358.50 720.00 117.00 -2.81% (283.69) 3,169.95 -0.11 -0.08 NO NO
ST63 GBPJPY 2 (10,246.81 ) 5 20.00% 16,877.07 600.00 42.50 -2.72% (255.03) 4,595.10 -0.06 -0.08 YES NO
ST63 GBPUSD 2 25,742.50 15 53.33% 42,195.50 600.00 127.50 1.43% 62.44 7,011.57 0.04 0.15 NO YES
ST63 USDCAD 2 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% 0 0 0 0.15
ST63 USDCHF 2 88,938.34 23 26.09% 31,713.37 920.00 138.00 3.98% (269.42) 3,664.54 0.05 0.15 NO YES
ST63 USDJPY 2 109,283.16 10 40.00% 12,432.77 400.00 60.00 4.61% 253.97 2,741.28 0.09 0.15 NO YES
ST64 AUDUSD 3 26,068.00 2 100.00% - 80.00 12.00 1.45% 189.25 1,448.14 0.06 0.15 NO YES
ST64 EURUSD 3 21,271.00 6 33.33% 7,799.50 240.00 39.00 5.39% 562.51 2,610.50 0.15 -0.08 YES YES
ST64 GBPJPY 3 (39,163.02) 7 14.29% 39,163.02 840.00 59.50 -9.23% (1,155.53) 5,366.63 -0.18 -0.08 NO NO
ST64 GBPUSD 3 (18,867.00 ) 22 36.3 6% 54,205.00 880.00 187.00 -1.08% 340.51 7,373.77 0.01 0.15 NO NO
ST64 USDCAD 3 - 0 0.00% - - - 0.00% - - 0 0.15
ST64 USDCHF 3 18,068.77 4 50.00% 2,176.95 160.00 24.00 1.04% 485.36 3,509.64 0.01 0.15 NO YES
ST64 USDJPY 3 76,793.58 16 37.50% 23,169.69 640.00 96.00 3.56% 186.63 2,782.41 0.06 0.15 NO YES
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 57/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 55
TABLE 3
Technical Trading System Rules by Currency
Currency # of cases % of
total Profitable Avg.
Sharpe Sharpe >
Bench Rank
(Sharpe)
AUDUSD 63 14.8% 63.5% (0.05762) 0.0% 5
EURUSD** 59 13.9% 62.7% (0.00881) 69.5% 4
GBPJPY** 55 12.9% 12.7% (0.15964) 30.9% 7
GBPUSD 63 14.8% 74.6% 0.04317 7.9% 2
USDCAD 60 14.1% 66.7% (0.08850) 0.0% 6
USDCHF 63 14.8% 87.3% 0.02286 7.9% 3
USDJPY 62 14.6% 95.2% 0.07726 12.9% 1
425*
*425 cases: 63 trading systems x 7 currencies = 441 total cases. 441 – 16 with 0 trades = 425. ** These currencies were tested over a different time frame
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 58/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 56
TABLE 4
Technical Trading System Rules by Complexity Level
# ofcases % of total Profitable Avg.Sharpe
Change
in avg.Sharpe Sharpe >Bench Rank(Sharpe)
Complexity level 1 70 16.5% 58.6% (0.06757) 10.0% 6
Complexity level 2 155 36.5% 67.7% (0.02258) 0.04499 16.1% 4
Complexity level 3 76 17.9% 65.8% (0.01763) 0.00495 18.4% 3
Complexity level 4 49 11.5% 73.5% 0.01490 0.03253 30.6% 1
Complexity level 5 68 16.0% 70.6% (0.00412) (0.01902) 20.6% 2
Complexity level 6 7 1.6% 71.4% (0.02429) (0.02017) 14.3% 5
425*
# ofcases
% oftotal Profitable
Avg.Sharpe
Sharpe >Bench
Rank(Sharpe)
Simple (Complexity 1-3) 301 70.8% 65.1% (0.03179) 15.3% 2
Robust (Complexity 4-6) 124 29.2% 71.8% 0.00226 24.2% 1
425*
*425 cases: 63 trading systems x 7 currencies = 441 total cases. 441 – 16 with 0 trades = 425.
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 59/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 57
FIGURE 1
Sample Chart with Technical Indicators
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 60/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 58
FIGURE 2
Head & Shoulders Pattern
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 61/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 59
FIGURE 3
Simple Moving Average
7/23/2019 Brian Leip Thesis
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/brian-leip-thesis 62/63
Technical Trading Systems in the Forex Market 60
FIGURE 4
Bollinger Bands