Balancing finance with
transport, land use planning
and government expectations
Steve Richards
Infrastructure Advisory
2
Topics
1. The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects
2. Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer
3. New PPP models for the transport sector
3
Interaction of Topics…
“All three topics are dependent
on each other…indeed, the ability
to capture value and consider
new PPP models is reliant on
getting the right settings for
integrated land use planning”Integrated land use planning
Capturing Value
New PPP models
4
Topics
1. The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects
2. Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer
3. New PPP models for the transport sector
Integrated Land Use Planning
Capture Value
New PPP models
5
• Let’s take stock…across Australia, integrated land use planning and project delivery principles are currently in place to varying degrees
• Examples include transport orientated developments, freight corridors, port development zones, airport trade coasts
• Infrastructure Australia (IA) is also on the scene setting and promoting integrated planning and major projects, particularly economic projects
• IA has noted, however, that infrastructure planning remains focussed on major projects rather than what infrastructure can do to improve Australians’ lives
The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects
6
The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects…cont.
• With productivity a key agenda for the future, the need for
national infrastructure policies that promote
integration (and therefore efficiency) will continue to
be on the radar
• Action on national policy work seems well advanced – we
already have a National Urban Policy for capital cities, a
National Ports Strategy, and a National Land Freight
Strategy
• But is there something missing…do we need some
national policy or guidance material to help capture
more value from land developments?
• Perhaps there is…the recent report by the Infrastructure
Financing Working Group recommended governments
should use appropriate models to drive revenue from the
broader benefits delivered by major infrastructure projects,
such as land value capture for transport infrastructure
7
The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects…cont.
• IA’s other point about infrastructure planning improving Australians’ lives is important when talking about land value capture
• Why? As we all know conceptually land property can “uplift” in value if features of land are highly desirable to the user
• Typically, something is highly desirable if it meets several key criteria – these key criteria can be economic, social or a mix of both
• So is the question “…If where we can reside makes our lives richer, does this make our land more valuable?”
8
The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects…cont.
• Why haven’t we been as keen in the past to work more on land value
capture?
• Perhaps in the past the combination of the need to implement new
infrastructure to meet rapid growth and available revenue to fund new
projects has seen less need/reliance on accessing land value capture
• Perhaps a positive from the GFC has been a refocus on building blocks
such as land value uplift
• So, what’s involved with capturing value from land development and new
projects?
9
Topics
1. The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects
2. Capture value – alternatives to demand risk transfer
3. New PPP models for the transport sector
Integrated Land Use Planning
Capture Value
New PPP models
10
Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer…
• Before considering alternatives to demand risk,
what do we mean by land value uplift or
capture, in the context of public infrastructure
projects?
• There are many definitions…perhaps the
simplest is “…the increase in land values in and
around a new piece of infrastructure…”
• Direct capture of this value by governments tends
to be in the form of land tax revenues and rates,
and indirectly through wider economic benefits
such as new industry locating to conduct
business
• Is there any research that can give us some
guidance or a framework?
11
Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer…
• One possible example is research by Fleissig and Carlton1 in the
United States on the success factors for transport orientated
developments (TOD)
• According to F&C, transit (project) implementation and real estate timing
are misaligned
• This misalignment comes about as transit developers work on long
implementation timeframes compared to short term timeframes of land
developers
• F&C believe that for land developers it can be difficult to justify
spending much time, effort or money on TOD site acquisition when
the payoff is “so far down the road”
1. Fleissig, W.K. & Carlton, I.R. “Aligning Transit and Real Estate: An Integrated Financial Strategy”
12
Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer…
• F&C suggest that commercially TODs tend to be higher-cost/lower profit
compared to suburban/infill development
Developer decision model25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
WeakMarket
StrongMarket
Ret
urn
on
inve
stm
ent
Investor Willingness to Fund:
Willing
Unwilling Suburban developer profit
TOD developer profit
Higher cost of TOD
Subsidy required to attract investment
13
Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer…
• To overcome this, F&C propose that the individual planning steps
taken by the transit and real estate elements of a TOD be combined
into a contiguous 6 step process/set of criteria
A. Route Alignment
B. Station Location
C. Station Area
A. Land Assemblage
B. Infrastructure
C. Vertical Development
1. Route Alignment
2. Station Location
3. Station Area
4. Land Assemblage
5. Infrastructure
6. Vertical Development
Tran
sit
Rea
l Est
ate
14
Capturing value – alternatives to demand risk transfer…
• Demand risk for transport infrastructure projects seems to centre around
patronage risk
• In the current economic environment, full transfer of patronage risk
to the private sector does not appear to be a viable option
• So, is the alternative to replace some of the patronage demand risk
(which is essentially tolling revenue as a project funding source)
with land value uplift revenue?
• In making this suggestion, we need to keep in mind there is still demand
risk involved. That is, demand for property is needed to uplift land value
15
Topics
1. The future of integrated land use planning and what it means for new projects
2. Capture value – alternatives to demand risk transfer
3. New PPP models for the transport sector
Integrated Land Use Planning
Capture Value
New PPP models
16
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• Given the lack of market appetite for patronage demand risk in PPPs, this gap could be filled partly with a land value uplift model
• To achieve this outcome requires a blueprint so that some certainty can be defined and pricing of risk
• Without a blueprint of some kind, we would see expectations by government of new infrastructure projects but the private sector is genuinely unable to deliver
• Under this blueprint, private debt and equity, and government contributions would all still continue to have a role in a PPP
17
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• Two parts to this blueprint to create
success
New criteria at the strategic
assessment stage of major projects
when determining PPP suitability
Set out a commercial
structure of key issues to consider
“land value uplift” PPP
18
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• New criteria at the PPP strategic assessment stage could be based on an economic development/system-wideframework
• This framework would assess the key economic drivers, social impacts, and commercial potential around new infrastructure projects
• Of course, such an approach would need to be tailored to the characteristics of the project, city and region
• One possible approach is to use a “criteria menu” based on a Liveability Benefits model
19
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• A Liveability Benefits model
has a range of values important
to a lifestyle in a particular
region
• The aim would be to identify
the Liveability Benefits relevant
to a particular project, and see
if the PPP model could be used
(or, alternatively, any other
procurement model)
20
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• If the PPP model can work with land value uplift, then a commercial structure would be needed
• What are some of principles/issues in this commercial structure?
Possible Commercial Principles/Issues in a Land Value Uplift PPP model
What is the role of government as the largest land holder in the State? What sort of
tenure/owner arrangements does the private sector need in order to have security?
Should government manage planning risk by consolidating sites and ensuring all
approvals in advance of projects?
Is there a land value uplift (or profit sharing) methodology that can be used, and is
there any sharing of land use uplift benefit over the life of the project?
Will there be any impact on the maintenance/abatement regime for any land
contributions that will be the responsibility of the PPP Proponent?
21
New PPP models for the transport sector…
• May be also worth considering that the ideas suggested in this presentation for the transport sector could also apply to social infrastructure
• This would recognise that schools, hospitals, public facilities all have a role to play in the value of the communities that we choose to live in
• For example, could we plan better clusters of public facilities (including co-location) that achieves a critical mass and, in doing so, improve efficiencies of poorly located public facilities?
22
Concluding Remarks
1. Is it time for a national policy/guidelines on land value uplift?
2. With the right structure and approach, land value uplift and PPPs could play a role in new infrastructure delivery
3. Land value uplift principles have equal application for both economic and social infrastructure
4. Let’s use the time we have now to do some research and implement some reforms
Integrated land use planning
Capturing Value
New PPP models