ACADEMICPERFORMANCEREPORTEaton Academy
November 2019
OUR MISSIONTo transform public education through accountability, innovation andaccess to quality education for all students.
OUR VISIONWe envision a diverse and dynamic public education marketplacethat fosters academic excellence for all children.
OUR VALUESIntegrity | Respect | Compassion | InclusivenessSocial Responsibility | Excellence | Innovation
Eaton AcademyTable of Contents
ACADEMY OVERVIEW
4 Demographics
5 Composite Resident District
ACADEMIC
6 Reading Achievement & Growth
8 Math Achievement & Growth
10 Michigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
11 Student Growth
12 Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
14 Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
END NOTES
15 Sources & Citations
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 3
Eaton AcademyDemographics
99%
100%
99%
99%
98%
79%
86%
66%
76%
74%
12%
14%
14%
13%
15%
1%
1%
0%
0%
36%
38%
35%
36%
41%
Studentsof Color
Free/ReducedLunch
SpecialEducation
EnglishLanguageLearner
Enrolled3 or MoreYears
0% 25% 50% 75% 100%
2018−2019 2017−2018 2016−2017
2015−2016 2014−2015
ENROLLMENT BY SUBGROUP
Fig. D−1
346333345313
350
0
100
200
300
400
500
2014
−201
5
2015
−201
6
2016
−201
7
2017
−201
8
2018
−201
9
Stu
dent
s
TOTAL ENROLLMENT BY YEAR
Fig. D−2
63
3019
24
16
18
15
31
15
15
20
17
16
21
27
6
0
20
40
60
80
K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Stu
dent
s
Students Enrolled 0−2 Years
Students Enrolled 3+ Years
STUDENTS PER GRADE
Fig. D−3
African American
YourSchool
American Indian
CMUAverage
Asian
StateAverage
Hawaiian
Hispanic
Multiracial
White
98.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
0.8%
44.9%
0.3%
3.3%
0.0%
3.3%
8.0%
40.1%
17.6%
0.6%
3.5%
0.1%
8.0%
4.2%
66.0%
RACIAL/ETHNIC BREAKDOWN
Fig. D−4
4 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademyComposite Resident District
The Composite Resident District (CRD) illustrates the public school district to which students would be assigned if they were notenrolled in the Academy. Due to geographical constraints, the map may not show all districts.
!(
Oakland County
WayneCounty
Macomb County
Detroit106
Roseville13
Grosse Pointe3
Van Dyke20
East Detroit201
Lake Shore1
Harper Woods5
!(
0 2.5 5Miles
EatonAcademy
!( SchoolStudentPopulation:
Lowest 25%25% - 50%50% - 75%Highest 25%
Student’s Resident District Number of Students Percent of Students
Eastpointe Community Schools 201 56.9%Detroit Public Schools Community District 106 30.0%Van Dyke Public Schools 20 5.7%Roseville Community Schools 13 3.7%Harper Woods, The School District of the City of 5 1.4%
Clinton Community Schools 4 1.1%Grosse Pointe Public Schools 3 0.8%Lake Shore Public Schools (Macomb) 1 0.3%
Fig. D-5
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 5
Eaton AcademyReading Achievement
175
196
194
209
204
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP® SPRING RESULTS − READING ACHIEVEMENT
25%
25% Students Met Target
75% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
11%
11% Students Met Target
89% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
14%
14% Students Met Target
86% Students Did Not Meet Target
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−1
6 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademyReading Growth
Grade 3
160
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
160
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Fall Spring
NA
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − READING GROWTH
49%
14%
5%
32%
64
2016−2017
20%
11%
3%66%
29
2017−2018
31%
15%5%
48% 46
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−2
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 7
Eaton AcademyMath Achievement
182
196
198
209
209
150
200
250
300
3 4 5 6 7Grade
Ave
rage
Sca
led
Sco
re
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019 Achievement Targets
STUDENTS ENROLLED FOR THREE OR MORE YEARS AS COMPARED TO THE ACHIEVEMENT TARGETS
MAP SPRING RESULTS − MATH ACHIEVEMENT
16%
16% Students Met Target
84% Students Did Not Meet Target
2016−2017
8%
8% Students Met Target
92% Students Did Not Meet Target
2017−2018
<5%
2018−2019
PERCENT OF STUDENTS MEETING THE TARGET
Fig. A−3
8 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademyMath Growth
Grade 3
160
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 3
Grade 3
Grade 4
Fall Spring
Grade 4
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Fall Spring
Grade 5
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
160
180
200
220
Fall Spring
Grade 6
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Fall Spring
Grade 7
Fall Spring
NA
2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MAP FALL−TO−SPRING RESULTS − MATH GROWTH
42%
14%6%
38%
56
2016−2017
13%
8%
1%
78%
27
2017−2018
18%
14%
3%66%
31
2018−2019
Very Low (1−44) Low (45−49) Moderate (50−64) High (65−99)
MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE & PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERCENTILE CATEGORIES
Fig. A−4
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 9
Eaton AcademyMichigan Test of Educational Progress (M-STEP) Achievement
9.2% 12.5% 9.8% 11.6%
19.5%21.6%
16.3%
17.0%
17.0%19.4% 16.5%
16.8%
47.3% 46.0%43.9%
44.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
* * * *
9.5%11.4%
9.4%
13.4%
9.3%10.9%
10.9%12.8%
37.3%
37.9% 37.4% 38.7%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADES 3 THROUGH 7 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
M−STEP MATH
Fig. A−5
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
10 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademyStudent Growth
49
5250 5045 48 46
4043
4845 43
50 50 50 50
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
42
37
42 4342 4444
4240
45 46 45
50 50 50 50
20
40
60
80
2015−2016 2016−2017 2017−2018 2018−2019
Mea
n S
tude
nt G
row
th P
erce
ntile
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
MEAN STUDENT GROWTH PERCENTILE FOR ALL STUDENTS AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
MATH
Fig. A−6
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 11
Eaton AcademyPreliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) Achievement
23.3%24.8%29.0%
61.9
%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
*3.5%6.5% 41
.4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
2018−2019
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
Academy Composite Resident District Local District State Average
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADE 8 MATH
Fig. A−7
* Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) – Federal law that prohibits student-identifiable education data from being publicly disseminated.A group of 10 or fewer students or percentage values of 5% or less is considered to contain student-identifiable data.
12 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademyPSAT Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT OF STUDENTS ADVANCED OR PROFICIENT
PSAT GRADES 9 & 10 MATH
Fig. A−8
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 13
Eaton AcademyScholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) Achievement
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT EVIDENCE−BASED READING AND WRITING
Not Applicable
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Per
cent
Pro
ficie
nt
PERCENT PROFICIENT FOR ALL STUDENTS IN GRADE 11 AS COMPARED TO THE COMPOSITE RESIDENTDISTRICT, LOCAL DISTRICT AND STATE AVERAGE
GRADE 11 SAT MATH
Fig. A−9
14 Academic Performance Report © 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University
Eaton AcademySources & Citations
Fig. D-1 CEPI Public Data; Michigan Student Data System (MSDS) fall – UnauditedFig. D-2 CEPI Public DataFig. D-3 MSDS fall – Unaudited; The display of 3+ students in kindergarten and first grade is due to the enrollment date provided in the fall MSDS.Fig. D-4 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. D-5 MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-1 NWEA’s MAP: reading – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-2 NWEA’s MAP: reading – springFig. A-3 NWEA’s MAP: math – spring; MSDS fall – UnauditedFig. A-4 NWEA’s MAP: math – springFig. A-5 Spring M-STEP – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-6 Spring MI-Access, M-STEP, PSAT 8, SAT – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-7 Spring PSAT 8 – Student-level and Public DataFig. A-8 Spring PSAT 9 & 10 – Student-levelFig. A-9 Spring SAT – Student-level and Public Data
© 2019 The Governor John Engler Center for Charter Schools at Central Michigan University Academic Performance Report 15
THE GOVERNOR JOHN ENGLER CENTER FOR CHARTER SCHOOLSCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY | MOUNT PLEASANT, MI 48859
(989) 774-2100 | www.TheCenterForCharters.org