8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
1/47 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.O
A Framework for State-Level
Promise ZonesBy Tracey Ross and Melissa Boteach December 2014
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
2/47
A Framework for State-LevelPromise Zones
By Tracey Ross and Melissa Boteach December 2014
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
3/47
1 Introduction and summary
3 Why place matters: The case for investing in
high-poverty communities
10 State Promise Zones: Launching the initiative
20 Potential policies and funding streams to support state
Promise Zones
35 Conclusion
36 Appendix
38 About the authors
39 Endnotes
Contents
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
4/47
1 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Introduction and summary
As a former mayor of an urban Promise Zone community, I have a unique
appreciation for the talent, passion, and the vision that local leaders offer when
working to turn their communities around. Promise Zones are about giving folks
who have been underserved for far too long the opportunity to build stronger
neighborhoods and more prosperous lives.1Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development Julian Castro, September 19, 2014
Earlier his year, Presiden Barack Obama announced he launch o he PromiseZones iniiaive, an effor o srenghen he ederal governmens relaionship
wih local leaders and o increase access o he resources and experise necessary
o improve mobiliy and economic opporuniy or high-povery communiies.2
Te Promise Zones model suppors innovaive localiies as hey implemen
comprehensive, evidence-based sraegies o revialize high-povery communiies.
Bu here is no need or he model o be resriced o he ederal level, paricularly
since many saes are pursuing sraegies o address hese same goals. Raher han
waiing or a ederal Promise Zones designaion, sae leaders can ake he iniiaive
o adop his model o increase opporuniy or heir residens who live in high-
povery areas. Acion o his ype would be an unprecedened sep by sae officials
o join local and ederal leaders o drive cross-secor, evidence-based soluions o
figh povery.
Saes have a direc sake in ackling povery wherever i exiss wihin heir borders,
as he effecs o income inequaliy and child povery creae a drag on sae
economies.3Bu saes also have a srong sel-ineres in pursuing a complemenary
se o policies ha arge resources o high-povery communiies wihin heir borders.
Holding consan or income, i has been well documened ha people who live in
high-povery communiies are more likely o sruggle o mee basic needs han heircounerpars in more affluen areas.4Furhermore, he effecs o concenraed
povery on children increase he need or social services.5For example, living in
concenraed povery has been shown o geneically age children,6and living in
communiies exposed o violence impairs heir cogniive abiliy.7Tese acors
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
5/47
2 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
increase he likelihood ha children will have poor healh and educaional
oucomes and ew employmen opporuniies in he uure, which limis heir
abiliy o conribue o heir saes economic growh and ax bases.8
Forunaely, saes have he ools a heir disposal o inves in high-povery
communiies and creae heir own Promise Zones effors. By pairing communiiescommited o houghul planning and evidence-based models wih he resources
needed o generae greaer economic opporuniy, saes can ensure ha available
resources are leveraged o have a greaer impac.
Overall, saes and localiies underake mos direc spending on public goods
and servicesincluding expendiures rom ederal undsand bear primary
responsibiliy or invesmens in educaion, social services, and inrasrucure.9
In addiion, saes adminiser a significan amoun o ederal discreionary
unding, giving sae leaders broad auhoriy over many perinen ederal unding
sreams. Furhermore, sae leaders are increasingly looking a how hey can helpamilies increase heir economic sel-sufficiency and provide opporuniies o
children who live in povery by invesing in everyhing rom early educaion o
energy efficiency in affordable housing.10
Tis repor serves as a ramework or sae leaders ineresed in esablishing sae
Promise Zones programs. Te ramework oulines how saes can incenivize
cross-secor eams o leaders in high-povery communiies o underake a
comprehensive planning process, ideniy key challenges on which o ocus,
develop concree oucomes o address hose challenges, and creae a shared plan
o mee hose goals. In addiion, his repor idenifies flexible sae and ederal
unding sreams ha saes can give Promise Zones, wih prioriy access available
hrough he use o bonus poins in exising grans. In shor, sae Promise Zones
are a recogniion o he imporan role ha sae leaders play in fighing povery
and creaing greaer economic opporuniy or high-povery communiies. By
adoping he Promise Zones model, sae leaders can complemen ederal effors
o keep amilies ou o povery by revializing high-povery communiies and
srenghening saes.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
6/47
3 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Why place matters:
The case for investing in
high-poverty communities
For decades, ederal leaders invesed in he sabiliy o affluen communiies,
while giving localiies he auonomy o neglec and ignore he invesmen needs
o low-income communiies and communiies o color. Beginning in he 1930s,
or insance, banks acively excluded Arican American communiies rom receiving
home loans, a pracice commonly known as redlining.11During he 1950s and
1960s, he ederal governmens urban renewal effor gave local governmens and
privae developers ree rein o develop downowns and displace he mosly poor
residens o color, wih no clear policy or relocaion. A bes, residens weremoved o public housing locaed in already segregaed, poor neighborhoods wih
ew resources.12Far oo ofen, however, residens were simply uprooed wih no
relocaion plan in place and orced o find housing on heir own wihin hese
disressed communiies.13
Te siuaion was no beter ouside ciy ceners. Troughou rural America, alhough
early developmen effors have produced much-needed basic inrasrucure, ederal
rural developmen programs in he 20h cenury have largely been driven by
agriculural policy, no by he needs o specific communiies and heir economic
realiies.14Furhermore, hese agriculure programs have been slashed across he
board, paricularly during he 1980s.15And hen here are ribal communiies,
o which he ederal governmen has a legal responsibiliy o provide a variey o
basic services.16In realiy, ribes have aced severe and chronic underunding o
criical programs or generaions, including hose imporan o educaion, healh,
and public saey.
As a resul o pas ailures, underinvesed communiies can oday be ound across
he counrycommuniies ha suffer rom problems ranging rom inerior
housing and inrasrucure o poor healh oucomes, underperorming schools,and litle o no economic opporuniies.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
7/47
4 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
According o he 20082012 American Communiy Survey, or ACS, more han
12.4 million Americans live in severely disressed neighborhoods where he
povery rae is a leas 40 percen or higher.17Ta figure represens an 11 percen
increase compared wih he 20072011 ACS daa, and i is a 72 percen increase
in he populaion o high-povery neighborhoods since he 2000 Census.18Over
he same ime period, he U.S. populaion as a whole increased by only 9 percen,underscoring he ac ha he increases in people living in concenraed povery
vasly ousripped populaion growh. Over he pas decade, ongoing racial and
ehnic segregaion combined wih rising income inequaliy has conribued o an
increase in he number o people who live in concenraed povery.19Among he
our regions o he Unied Saes, he Norheas had he smalles increase in
concenraed povery, while he Souh had he highes increase.20
FIGURE 1
Percent of people in distressed U.S. Census tractsBy Census region
Source: Alemayehu Bishaw, Changes in Areas With Concentrated Poverty: 2000 to 2010 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2014), AppendixTable 1, available at https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-27.pdf.
Northeast
South
West
Midwest
2000
2012
3.3%
3.9%
2000
2012
1.8%
4.4%
2000
2012
2.9%
4.5%
2000
2012
2.5%
3.5%
According o a recen repor by Barbara Sard and Douglas Rice,21living in neigh-
borhoods o concenraed disadvanagedefined in erms o racial segregaion,raes o unemploymen, he share o single-paren amilies, and exposure o
neighborhood violencecan impair childrens cogniive developmen and school
perormance.22For example, rom 2008 o 2009, hal o ourh and eighh graders
atending high-povery schoolswhere 75 percen or more o sudens quali y or
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
8/47
5 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
ree or reduced-price mealsailed he Naional Assessmen o Educaional
Progress reading es, compared wih he ewer han one in five, or 20 percen, o
ourh and eighh graders atending low-povery schoolswhere less han 25
percen o sudens qualiy or ree or reduced-price meals23who ailed he
reading es. Oher sudies find negaive associaions beween neighborhood
povery and adul employmen and earnings.24
Anoher series o sudies led by sociologis Parick Sharkey o New York
Universiy srongly sugges ha exposure o neighborhood violence, which is
more prevalen in areas o concenraed povery, has significan negaive effecs on
childrens cogniive abiliy.25One sudy ha ocused on neighborhood violence
ound ha preschool children were less able o conrol heir impulses, pay
atenion, or perorm well on preacademic ess wihin a week o a homicide
occurring near heir home.26
Residens o poor neighborhoods also end o experience healh problemsincluding depression, ashma, diabees, and hear diseasea higher-han-average
raes. In ac, even when income is held consan, amilies who live in areas o
concenraed povery are more likely o sruggle o mee basic needs, including ood
and housing, han heir counerpars who live in more affluen areas. Families in hese
areas ace ewer sressors, such as less exposure o crime and improved air qualiy.27
Tis is paricularly roubling when considering he racial equiy implicaions o
concenraed povery. Arican American, American Indian and Alaskan Naive,
and Laino children are six o nine imes more likely han whie children o live in
high-povery communiies. In ac, more han 16.4 percen o low-income Lainos
live in high-povery neighborhoods, while low-income Arican Americans are
more likely o live in high-povery neighborhoods han oher populaions, wih
23.6 percen o he Arican American populaion currenly living in such areas.28
In addiion, recen evidence suggess ha living in a high-povery neighborhood
undermines oucomes across generaions. According o research by Sharkey, he
average Arican American amily making $100,000 per year lives in a more
disadvanaged neighborhood han he average whie amily making $30,000 per
year. Tis reveals how pas social policies coninue o affec neighborhood choice.29
Sharkey explains ha he same, mosly Arican American amilies have lived in hemos disadvanaged neighborhoods over long periods o ime and over muliple
generaions, limiing access o beter opporuniies.30
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
9/47
6 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
A recen body o research rom our Harvard Universiy and Universiy o
Caliornia, Berkeley, economissRaj Chety, Nahaniel Hendren, Parick Kline,
and Emmanuel Saezunderscores he naions mobiliy challenges. Teir research
reveals ha mobiliy varies subsanially across geographic regions and ha areas
wih greaer mobiliy end o display cerain characerisics, such as less segregaion,
less income inequaliy, beter schools, greaer social capial, and more sable amilies.31
In addiion, according o analysis by Cener or American Progress expers, areas
wih large middle-class populaions enjoy ar more economic mobiliy han areas
wih small middle-class populaions.32In oher words, he variaion in economic
mobiliy is no random bu is affeced by key characerisics o a communiy.
Research showsha income inequaliy and low social mobiliy place a downward
drag on naional prosperiy, underscoring how he srengh o our communiies is
inexricably ied o he success o our counry. I is eviden ha governmen leaders
have a role o play in undoing he effecs o pas policies ha conribued o hese
oucomes and mus proacively seek ou ways o generae greaer economicopporuniy in parnership wih communiies across he counry. Low-income
people who live in communiies o concenraed povery ace a greaer level o
disadvanage han heir counerpars in low-povery communiies. As a resul,
saes mus make a concered effor o address hese dispariies and o arge
invesmens oward hese communiies.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
10/47
7 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Living in high-povery communiies creaes unique challenges or residens, which
require place-based sraegies ha complemen naional invesmens o cu povery.33
Place-based sraegies uilize policies and pracices ha consider how a communiy
everyhing rom inrasrucure o he social and economic opporuniies available
affecs he lives o is residens. Underperorming schools, rundown housing,
neighborhood violence, and poor healh are inerconneced challenges ha
perpeuae one anoher; hereore, place-based sraegies are designed o
simulaneously address hese issues. Te Promise Zones model is a comprehensive,
evidence-based sraegy o do jus ha.
FIGURE 2
People living in high poverty areas by state, 2010
Source: Alemayehu Bishaw, "Changes in Areas With Concentrated Poverty: 2000 to 2010" (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2014), availabe at
http://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2014/acs/acs-27.pdf.
5%14.9%
15%19.9%
20%29.9%
30%34.9%
35%50%
VT NH
MA
RICT
NJ
DE
MD
DC
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
11/47
8 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Promise Zones are not a substitute for additional federal and state investments
While this report talks about what states can do within the context of current funding, state
Promise Zones are not a substitute for additional federal and state investments and reforms
to help create jobs and strengthen the safety net more broadly.
States have a direct stake in tackling poverty among their residents because the effects of
income inequality and child poverty harm state economies.34For example, research shows
that income inequality reduces government revenues, which hinders the ability of state
governments to provide critical public goods and services such as education and infrastructure.35
In addition, high levels of income inequality are causally related to higher school dropout
rates, especially among low-income boys, and higher teen birth rates. Both of these things
limit the earnings of future taxpayers and undermine a states human capital.36To this end,
CAP has published several recommendations on state policies to cut poverty and grow astates middle class across the board.37These include:
Passing paid sick leave legislation
Raising the minimum wage
Protecting unemployment insurance
Centralizing funding for education to eliminate disparities
Easing transfers across postsecondary institutions
Reducing health care costs
Increasing the use of renewable energy to cut energy costs
Promise Zones are not enterprise zones
The Promise Zones name harkens back to the enterprise zone model started in the United
Kingdom and adopted in the United States, but it should not be mistaken for a new version
of these state and federal programs. Enterprise zones utilize tax benefits to attract businesses
and promote hiring within high-poverty communities in hopes of spurring economic
development but have ultimately produced mixed results. The Promise Zones application
process is much more rigorous than its federal predecessorsthe Empowerment Zone and
Enterprise Community programsand is focused on a wide range of interconnected issues
that affect low-income communities. In fact, the Obama administration took the enterprise
zone experience into account in designing Promise Zones.38Rather than just applying with a
Setting the record straight:What state Promise Zones are not
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
12/47
9 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
proposal for economic development, Promise Zones applicants are required to outline the
outcomes they want to achieve, describe their capacity to do so and the roles of their partners,
demonstrate past successes, and commit to using data to drive outcomes. 39These are
communities that can reach a tipping point, said Cecilia Muoz, assistant to the president
and director of the White Houses Domestic Policy Council, in a New York Times interview.
Its about creating a policy thats greater than the sum of its parts.40While the Obama
administration is pursuing tax benefits as one component of the federal Promise Zonesinitiative, the effort is largely driven by implementing evidence-based strategies and directing
resources to those strategies. By contrast, tax benefits are the cornerstone of enterprise zone
and empowerment zone efforts. For more information on the Empowerment Zone and
Enterprise Community programs, see Appendix 1.
Promise Zones are not just a benefit for the selected zones
A state Promise Zones model advocates for targeting a set of resources to high-poverty
communities, which, in a world of limited resources, represents trade-offs in making these
investments in less-disadvantaged communities. However, targeting scarce resources to
some of the most disadvantaged communities with the potential to move the needle on
place-based interventions will enable these communities to leverage resources for greater
outcomes. This has the potential to have a larger impact beyond the borders of the zone. The
goal of the Promise Zones initiative is not only to transform the selected zones but also to
change how the state government works with local communities and to demonstrate effective
strategies that other communities can adapt. Furthermore, while many high-poverty
communities could benefit from a state Promise Zones designation, the application process
alone will incentivize communities to bring together their resources to set clear and shared
goals, which is critical for communities to do regardless of whether they are ultimately
selected for the initiative.
That being said, expanding the pot of federal and state resources would reduce the
trade-offs that pit the needs of communities against one another and would enable more
communities that are implementing innovative cross-sector models to benefit from the
infusion of resources. This could boost economic opportunity for residents more broadly.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
13/47
10 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
State Promise Zones:
Launching the initiative
Uilizing he Obama adminisraions model or Promise Zones, saes mus
incenivize cross-secor eams o leaders in high-povery areas o come ogeher o
develop plans or revializing heir communiies. A sae Promise Zones iniiaive
would require communiies o compee in a ransparen process and o demonsrae
he srengh and effeciveness o heir local commimen in order o be awarded a
sae Promise Zones designaion. In exchange, saes mus commi inensive suppor
o help local leaders implemen heir economic and communiy developmen
goals. Tey also mus provide zones wih preerred access o cerain sae undingand compeiive ederal unding sreams.
As envisioned, each designaed sae Promise Zone would be asked o ideniy a
se o oucomes i was pursuing o revialize is communiy, describe is sraegy
or supporing hose oucomes, and realign resources accordingly. Building off o
he Obama adminisraions Promise Zones iniiaive, sae Promise Zones should
ideniy clear oucomes o revialize communiies wih a ocus on:
Atracing privae invesmen o creae jobs and spur economic developmen
Improving he educaion-workorce pipeline
Creaing sae and healhy communiies
Repairing and preserving housing and inrasrucure
Given he inerdependen naure o hese issues, Promise Zones may begin heir
work wih a ocus on one or wo areas bu should have a long-erm vision or
making progress across each o he areas noed above.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
14/47
11 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
In the first round of the federal Promise Zones designation, communities have struggled to
engage state leaders, even though this was one of the criteria assessed under capacity and
local commitment.41However, states have important resources at their disposal, including
grants and the ability to address policy barriers. Promise Zones leaders must determine
specific ways in which states can facilitate their work and propose these actions to state
leaders. Below are examples of how these leaders can better engage the leaders in their
states when it comes to spending and policy.
Spending
States make a number of spending decisions, whether it is through their own budgets or by
making subgrants to municipalities. States can give priority access to federal Promise Zones
located in their boundaries and leverage resources in these communities.
Policy
States can also pass policies to complement the innovative work that local leaders are doing.
In Maryland, for example, the Baltimore Integration Partnership is working to revitalize
low-income communities and to connect low-income Baltimore residents to the regional
economy.42The Baltimore Integration Partnership worked closely with Maryland state and
local elected officialsproviding policy analysis and recommendations, as well as commu-
nity voiceto pursue and enact policies that benefit low-income people.43As a result, the
state of Maryland passed a number of laws to help advance the goals of such work,
including:
A law to remove barriers for qualified workers with criminal records44
A law that shortens the process by which adults can apply for and earn a drivers license
a key requirement for many jobs45
A state executive order to promote apprenticeship programs and encourage hiring in areas
with high unemployment46
Improving state and local leaders partnerships in thefederal Promise Zones initiative
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
15/47
12 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
State Promise Zones eligibility
Firs, saes mus deermine he condiions ha demonsrae a communiy is
paricularly in need. Based on he ederal Promise Zones iniiaive, saes can
adop he ollowing crieria or local purposes and se he sandards o eligibiliy
or heir own Promise Zones iniiaives:
Demonstrated need.Saes can use he raes o overall povery, unemploymen,
vacancy, and/or crime o deermine he ype o communiies hey wish o serve.
Seting clear eligibiliy sandards will help ensure ha he neighborhoods wih
he greaes needand he poenial o successully advance he workare
being considered.
Specific geographic area.A he ederal level, Promise Zones mus encompass
one or more Census racs or porions o Census racs across a coniguous
geography. Saes can use a similar approach o capure areas beyond a givenneighborhood o have maximum impac in a high-povery area.
Designated population size.A he ederal level, he boundaries o urban
Promise Zones mus encompass a populaion o beween 10,000 and 200,000
residens.47For rural and ribal areas, he populaion mus be a maximum o
200,000 residens.48Similar guidelines employed by saes would ensure ha he
varying ypes o communiies argeed are helping a significan par o he
populaion.
Qualifying lead applicant.Te eniy submiting he sae Promise Zones
applicaion and coordinaing he effor should be one o he ollowing: a
governmen body, a nonprofi organizaion, a public housing agency, a local
educaion agency, a meropolian planning organizaion, or a communiy
college. Such eniies ypically have he capaciy and legiimacy o bring
ogeher leaders o advance comprehensive effors.
Support from local leadership.Local leaders, including he mayors or chie
execuives o local governmens represened in he Promise Zones, mus
demonsrae suppor or he effor. Having his buy-in will ensure ha resourcesand policies can beter serve he zones.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
16/47
13 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
At the federal level, Promise Zones applicants are evaluated on the strength of their initiative
the capacity of local leaders, commitments made by key actors, and morein order to
determine how the Promise Zones designation would accelerate the communitys existing
efforts. Rather than helping build a strategy from scratch, administrative officials want federal
resources to serve as a catalyst for speeding up and expanding compelling local strategies.
Similarly, state leaders should consider when state Promise Zones resources would best serve
local leaders. Initiatives of this scale require a great deal of planning, coordination, and time
and will not get off the ground, or even see results, overnight. According to the Bridgespan
Group, a nonprofit advisor and resource for mission-driven organizations, collaboratives
typically go through several life stagesfrom developing the idea to deciding the future of
the initiative. (see below)
State leaders should consider intervening when an initiative is beyond the initial stages of
idea development and when it is evident that stakeholders are truly committed to working
together in new ways. Providing a reliable stream of funding when work is underway would
then help leaders move beyond survival mode and allow them the ability to think deeply
about the direction of the work. As a result, state Promise Zones designations should be
awarded to communities working between the plan and the align & improve stages
where intervention can help sustain innovative work.
Estimated timeline
FIGURE 3
Collective impact guide
Community collaborative life stages
Source: The Bridgespan Group, "Needle-Moving Collective Impact Guide: Community Collaborative Life Stages," available at http://www.bridgespan.org/Publications-and-Tools/Revitalizing-Communities/Comm
Collaboratives/Guide-Community-Collaborative-Life-Stages.aspx#.VD7nO4vF87H (last accessed November 2014).
Develop the idea(36 months)
Plan(12 years)
Align & Improve(13 years)
Reflect & Adapt(ongoing)
Decide & Next St(46 years)
Build broad public
support
Define a vision and
develop actionable
plans for years ahead
while building capacity
and resources
Align community
resources, programs,
and advocacy toward
what works best, while
using data to
continuously improve
Constantly monitor
progress against goals
to understand how they
must adapt to changing
circumstances
Assess overall progre
and determine the
path forward
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
17/47
14 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Application criteria
Applicaions used or sae Promise Zones effors should provide a clear descrip-
ion o how he Promise Zones designaion would accelerae and srenghen a
communiys revializaion effors. Each communiy should ideniy he
ollowing:
A se o oucomes i will pursue o revialize is communiy
A sraegy or supporing hose oucomes
A descripion o how i will use daa o redirec resources oward wha works
Te Promise Zones model is based on he demonsraed success o collecive
impac, a sraegy or solving complex local problems hrough daa-driven,
oucomes-ocused, cross-secor parnerships. As a resul, saes should use hecondiions o successul collecive-impac iniiaives o guide how hey assess he
srengh o poenial zones.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
18/47
15 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Collective impact is focused on community-wide outcomesfor example, improving the
educational system that serves all students in a community, rather than a single program that
helps a fraction of students. While individual programs are important for driving people-level
outcomes, collective impact takes on the task of transforming an entire system. Collective
impact is a strategy that acknowledges the relationships between organizations and the need
for progress toward shared objectives. In other words, the whole is greater than the sum of the
individual parts. However, this work is much easier said than done. It is a very different way of
working than most people or institutions are used to. Leaders at FSGa nonprofit consulting
firm that specializes in strategy, evaluation, and researchfound that successful collective-
impact initiatives typically display the following five conditions:49
One of the most cited examples of a successful collective-impact
initiative is the Strive Partnership in Cincinnati, Ohio. Launched in 2006,
the Strive Partnership is a community of cross-sector leaders focused on
improving academic success in the urban core of Greater Cincinnati.
More than 300 cross-sector representatives joined the partnership,
including school district superintendents, early childhood educators,
nonprofit practitioners, business leaders, community and corporate
funders, city officials, and university presidents.50The idea was not to
start a new program but instead to start a new process for transforming
the educational system. The leaders involved agreed on a common set of
goals, outcomes, and success indicators, including kindergarten
readiness, fourth-grade reading and math scores, graduation rates, and
college completion. The partnership is driven by five shared goals.
Specifically, the goals are that every child:
1. Is prepared for school
2. Is supported outside of school
3. Succeeds academically
4. Completes some form of postsecondary education or trainingEnters and advances in a
meaningful career51
During its first five years, the program saw a 9 percent increase in kindergarteners reading
scores, an 11 percent increase in high school graduation rates, and a 10 percent increase in
college enrollment.52The Strive Partnership is successful because stakeholders work to
catalyze and support collaborative action, promote a culture of continuous improvement,
and align resources to what works.
Ensuring success: Conditions of collective impact
FIGURE 4
Five conditions of collective impact
Source: John Kania and Mark Kramer, Collective Impact, Stanford Socia
Innovation Review9 (1) (2011), available at http://www.ssireview.org/
articles/entry/collective_impact.
Common
agenda
Bac
kb
one
support
organiz
ation
s
Continu
ousMu
tually
comm
unicat
ion re
infor
cin
g
activitie
s
Sh
measurem
ent
sy
stem
s
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
19/47
16 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Outcomes
Collecive impac requires paricipans o have a common agenda 53a shared
vision or change ha includes a common undersanding o he problem and a
join approach o solving i hrough agreed-upon acions. Tere is no silver-bulle
policy o address he many challenges ha high-povery communiies ace.Insead, hese communiies need a comprehensive se o sraegies ha equip
residens wih he skills hey need o prosper, as well as an environmen conducive
o heir success. Tis sor o work requires coninuous communicaion.54
Developing rus among nonprofis, corporaions, and governmen agencies is
challenging. I can ake several years o regular meeings; some poenial sae
designees may have his level o communicaion hrough pas coaliions.
Given he various ways a communiy can affec he lie oucomes o is residens,
sae Promise Zones applicans should ouline heir plan o simulaneously
improve he educaion-workorce pipeline, creae sae and healhy communiies,repair and preserve housing and inrasrucure, and atrac privae invesmen.
Proposals should describe he evidence ha suppors he work hey plan o
coninue or underake. As par o his sraegy, applicans should also ouline he
iming and sequencing o specific componens o he plan. In addiion, i is criical
ha sraegies ake ino accoun he ac ha neighborhoods operae wihin a
broader poliical and economic conex ha is regional in naure.
Strategy
A sae Promise Zones iniiaive should be designed o suppor innovaive work
ha communiies are already doing. Local leaders drive he direcion o he effor,
while he sae governmen serves as a caalys by providing criical resources,
aciliaing parnerships, and building capaciy. Tis dynamic can be seen hrough
he ederal Promise Zones iniiaive, where he San Anonio, exas, Promise Zone
is building upon ransporaion enhancemens already underway. As a resul o is
designaion, he local ransi auhoriy received a $15 million ransporaion
Invesmen Generaing Economic Recovery, or IGER, award rom he U.S.
Deparmen o ransporaion o develop he Wesside Mulimodal ransiCener, which will offer a variey o ransi opions o he communiy.55
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
20/47
17 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
In order o capure he work underway, sae Promise Zones applicans should
provide a narraive ha describes he capaciy o he lead organizaion and how he
Promise Zones designaion would advance heir effors. Creaing and managing
collecive impac requires a supporing inrasrucure, as paricipaing organizaions
do no have he capaciy o ensure daa are shared or meeings are being scheduled.
Many coaliions ail because hey do no have he suppor o a dedicaed saff,making backbone suppor organizaionsorganizaions ha serve as he back-
bones o enire iniiaivesa criical elemen o an iniiaives success.56
In addiion, applicaions should include a narraive ha describes how paricipaing
sakeholders are organized, including he specific roles and responsibiliies o each
parner organizaion. Tis is paricularly imporan around he role o anchor
insiuions and privae-secor parners, which are ofen no deeply engaged in
hese sors o collaboraives. I is also imporan in describing how sae leaders
could engage wih local parners. Te narraive should ouline muually reinorc-
ing aciviies.57Having shared goals does no mean ha all paricipans areperorming he same acions. Iniiaives should ensure ha paricipaing organizaions
underake he aciviies a which hey excel, while supporing and coordinaing
work wih ohers.
Data
Wih a common agenda in place, sakeholders need o agree on a shared measure-
men sysem58o rack success. Collecing daa on key indicaors across paricipaing
organizaions ensures ha effors remain aligned and allows paricipans o
coninuously learn. Communiies mus manage, share, and use daa or evaluaion
and coninuous improvemen; his is criical or sraegies wih less supporing
evidence han ohers. Moreover, he muual managemen and sharing o daa is
paricularly helpul o ensure ha sakeholders are ocused on heir shared goals.
Trough he ederal Promise Zones iniiaive, or example, he Los Angeles Promise
Zone is racking 23 differen indicaors a he individual, amily, and household
levels or he zones core oucomes, which include hings such as improved academic
oucomes and wraparound services.59Daa include inormaion on grades;
atendance; services provided o sudens by organizaions; and backgroundinormaion on amilies, such as educaion and healh.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
21/47
18 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
According o Dixon Slingerland, execuive direcor o he Youh Policy Insiue in
Los Angeles, or he firs ime, he school disric is sharing suden-level daa
wih our daa sysem, so we can rack individual kids. Our daa sysem is o high
enough qualiy ha heyre comorable doing ha wihou violaing privacy.
Mos imporanly, he superinenden made he commimen. Youve go o have
he leadership, bu youve also go o have he daa sysem o do i. Slingerlandsaid his daa will help he ciy and is parners ensure hey are on rack o reach
heir goals and course correc when necessary.60
Benefits
Saes should award heir chosen Promise Zones designees he resources o help
implemen heir sraegies and atrac addiional financial suppor and capaciy.
Such benefis could include:
Planning grants.While he ederal Promise Zones iniiaive does no come wih
an iniial gran award, a small iniial planning gran could urher caalyze effors
or each sae Promise Zone. During CAPs inerviews wih he firs five Promise
Zones rom he ederal iniiaive, leaders rom each sie expressed he need or
an iniial, modes planning gran o help build capaciy and enhance heir
ongoing effors. Saes could call on heir agencies o ideniy discreionary or
compeiive unding sreams where, under curren sauory parameers, a small
percenage o unding could be se aside or heir Promise Zones designees.
Priority access to funding. Sae Promise Zones should be awarded addiional
poins or sae unding, as well as compeiive ederal unding sreams over
which saes have discreion. Examples are deailed in he secions below.
AmeriCorps volunteers. Each ederal Promise Zone is suppored by
AmeriCorps members who assis in he implemenaion o he zones plan o
creae economic growh and opporuniy or all. Tese AmeriCorps members
play a key role in providing he mission-driven human capial o help zones
achieve heir goals. Approximaely wo-hirds o AmeriCorps gran unding in
each sae goes o governor-appoined sae commissions.61
Saes should engageheir governor-appoined sae service commissions, which are responsible or
managing AmeriCorps sae and naional ormula unds rom he Corporaion
or Naional and Communiy Service. Tese sae service commissions can play
an imporan role by providing unding and engaging local communiies in he
work o designaed sae Promise Zones.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
22/47
19 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Dedicated staff.Where possible, saes should consider dedicaing saff as
poins o conac o he specific zones o help hem navigae sae resources and
provide added capaciy.
For urher reerence, he ederal governmens applicaion maerials can be ound
on he Deparmen o Housing and Urban Developmens websie underPromise Zones.62
Given the great interest in federal place-based initiatives, other
organizations are demonstrating that there is an appetite for
adopting such efforts at the state level. Prior to the creation of
Promise Zones, the Obama administration established a number ofplace-based initiatives, including Promise Neighborhoods. Launched
in 2010 by the U.S. Department of Education, the Promise Neighbor-
hoods program was designed to move beyond a singular focus on
low-performing schools to recognize the role that an entire commu-
nity plays in a childs education.63Modeled after the much-heralded
Harlem Childrens Zone in New York City, the Promise Neighborhoods
program models a cradle-to-career continuum of health, social, and
educational services by partnering with community-based organiza-
tions and gauges outcomes by utilizing common metrics of success.
The Promise Neighborhoods Institute at PolicyLink, or PNI, whichprovides resources and guidance to Promise Neighborhoods,
recognized that this model could be spread to states across the
country. For instance, PNI was an early supporter of the California
Promise Neighborhoods Initiative legislation. The bill passed the
California State Assembly but needs to be introduced in the new
session. This past summer, PNI introduced model legislation to
used at the state and local levels to secure support for cradle-to
career efforts.64The Cradle to Career Act secures funding for inn
tive, results-based, and comprehensive solutions that connectchildren and youth to a high-quality education and key health
social services that prepare them to succeed in college and in t
careers. The legislation:
Establishes a continuum of solutions for all children living in
distressed neighborhoods
Incentivizes a disciplined execution of solutions
Includes a matching requirement to encourage public/privat
partnerships and lay the groundwork for sustainability
Encourages use of data and evaluation65
Currently, several communities are preparing efforts to get the
to Career Act introduced in their states.66
The Promise Neighborhoods Institutes cradle-to-career model legislation
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
23/47
20 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Potential policies and funding
streams to support state
Promise Zones
In order o incenivize leaders in high-povery communiies o commi o a
rigorous process o advance heir work, saes mus provide inensive suppor and
prioriy access o cerain sae unding and compeiive ederal unding sreams.
Given he ac ha saes underake mos direc spending on public goods and
services and have broad auhoriy over numerous ederal unding sreams, sae
leaders are already equipped o esablish heir own Promise Zones iniiaives.
According o he Cener on Budge and Policy Prioriies, he vasmajoriy o sae dollars go oward unding educaion and healh
care. In ac, saes are one o he main unders o public elemen-
ary and secondary schools, wih local governmens being he
oher primary under. On average, one-ourh o sae spending, or
abou $270 billion, goes o public educaion.67In erms o healh,
saes und healh insurance or low-income amilies hrough
Medicaid and he Childrens Healh Insurance Program, or CHIP,
as well as healh benefis or public employees and care or people
wih menal illness and developmenal disabiliies. In a ypical
monh, hese programs provide healh coverage or coverage or
long-erm care o roughly 63 million low-income children, parens,
elderly people, and people wih disabiliies.68While hal o sae
unds go oward educaion and healh, saes also und a wide
variey o oher services, including ransporaion, correcions,
pension, assisance o low-income amilies, economic develop-
men, environmenal projecs, sae police, parks and recreaion,
housing, and aid o local governmens.
FIGURE 5
Percentage of state spending,
fiscal year 2012
Note: Calculations do not include federal funds spent by states. "All otspending" category includes care for residents with disabilities, pensiohealth benefits for public employees, economic development, enviro
projects, state police, parks and recreation, and general aid to localgovernments. Numbers do not sum up to 100 percent due to roundi
Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, "Policy Basics: Where DState Tax Dollars Go?" (2014), available at http://www.cbpp.org/files/
policybasics-statetaxdollars.pdf.
K-12 education: 25
Medicaid: 16%
Higher education:
Transportation: 5%
Corrections: 5%
Public assistance:
All other spending
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
24/47
21 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
In addiion, saes have broad flexibiliy when adminisering many ederal grans,
prioriizing unding o specific projecs, populaions, or regions. For example,
saes se he guidelines or child care subsidies and make decisions on how o
allocae unding sreams ha do no serve all eligible people or eniies, such as
he Social Services Block Gran and he Communiy Developmen Block Gran,
or CDBG. Creaing sae Promise Zones programs could give zone designeesprioriy access o a porion o unding across hese ederal grans and allow local
leaders o more easily leverage sae and local unding sreams. In addiion, as sae
fiscal condiions coninue o improve, saes can consider increasing available
resources o hese programs, keeping in mind ha argeing resources in hese
areas will have he added benefi o advancing and susaining innovaive work
rom which oher communiies in he sae can learn.
As saed earlier, given he inerdependen naure o hese issues, zones may begin
heir work by ocusing on one or wo issue areas bu should have a vision or
progress across all criical issue areas. Te secion below oulines he challengesha high-povery communiies ace, sraegies ha sae leaders can employ in
shaping heir Promise Zones iniiaives in he key issue areas, available ederal
unding sreams, and bes pracices rom local leaders.
Attracting private investment, creating jobs
As discussed earlier, high-povery communiies have suffered rom decades o
underinvesmen. Exacerbaing he neglec, reducions in ederal and sae unds
are making i increasingly difficul or local governmens o inves in economic
developmen. Privae invesmen is criical o addressing he economic, housing,
inrasrucure, and ransporaion needs oulined in his repor. While increasing
opporuniies wihin he zones hemselves is imporan, i is criical o ensure ha
Promise Zones residens have greaer access o, and are prepared or, employmen
opporuniies wihin he broader region. (see workorce recommendaions in he
Educaion-workorce pipeline secion and ransporaion recommendaions in
he Housing and inrasrucure secion, boh below) Sill, invesmen wihin he
zones is criical, bu even when privae capial is available, many ciies do no have
he capaciy o atrac and deploy hese resources.69
I is criical ha sae PromiseZones iniiaives promp applicans o assess heir abiliy o atrac and deploy capial.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
25/47
22 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Potential state actions
Require Promise Zones applicants to map out their community investment
infrastructure. Successully atracing and deploying privae capial requires
collaboraion among many acors, beyond banks and communiy developmen
financial insiuions. According o Living Ciies, a philanhropic collaboraiveha works o ransorm low-income communiies, successul communiy
invesmen requires collaboraion among many groups, including communiy-
based organizaions, financial insiuions, developers, he local business
communiy, he public secor, and anchor insiuions such as universiies and
hospials.70Sae Promise Zones designees mus convene hese poenial parners
around specific opporuniies and develop ongoing relaionships o build capaciy
or communiy invesmen. Securing and leveraging privae invesmen will help
advance he goals o a sae Promise Zone, as well as ensure he longeviy o he
effor.71As a resul, saes should require sae Promise Zones o map ou heir
local communiy invesmen ecosysem, ouline curren privae-secor parner-ships, and discuss how hey plan o build capaciy o guide invesmen oward
greaer social oucomes. Criical quesions o address include:72
Which acors seward invesmens rom beginning o end, which ake he lead,
and wha happens when hings go wrong? How are grans, raining, daa, and coordinaion used o boos he effecive-
ness o communiy invesmen? How are economic developmen, social equiy, and susainabiliy goals
inegraed ino deals and programs?
In Detroit, Michigan, the Woodward Corridor Initiative, or WCI, is
focused on stabilizing neighborhoods, increasing investment, and
attracting new residents to one of the city s main thoroughfares.
However, WCI faced challenges deploying private capital for public
purposes. As a result, initiative leaders turned to a national financial
intermediary, Capital Impact, for assistance. Capital Impact brought
its expertise, balance sheet, and relationships with national funders
to the local partnership, allowing the partnership to build up its
capacity for working with private capital in a difficult environm
The initiative also incorporated a creative strategy to raise capi
working with the citys anchor institutions, including the Henry
Medical Center and Wayne State University.74The anchor institu
offered employees home loans and renter allowances to move
community, promoting a mixed-income neighborhood.75
Best practices in attracting private investment
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
26/47
23 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Education-workforce pipeline
Childhood povery is associaed wih a hos o negaive oucomes, including lower
educaional atainmen, lower job earnings laer in lie, and higher healh and
criminal jusice cossall o which cos he American economy more han $500
billion per year.76
Wih he child povery rae a 19.9 percen, many schools acehe challenge o eaching sudens burdened wih unme needs ha pose obsacles
o learning. Furhermore, only one-hird o U.S. eighh graders are proficien in
mah and reading,77and high school sudens are no graduaing wih he skills
hey need o pursue higher educaion or jobs, wih only one-quarer perorming
proficienly or beter in mah and jus 40 percen perorming proficienly or beter
in reading.78A 2009 repor by McKinsey & Company on he gaps in primary and
secondary school achievemen argued ha he Unied Saes is experiencing he
economic equivalen o a permanen naional recession.79I is criical or commu-
niies o improve he cradle-o-career pipeline in order o ensure ha children
have greaer access o economic opporuniies laer in lie.
Potential state actions
Ensure state Promise Zones applicants align their education and workforce
development systems. During he sae Promise Zones applicaion process,
saes should require poenial designees o describe heir plan o ensure ha all
young people have access o a qualiy educaion and resources o prepare hem
or college and careers. Te narraive should ideniy specific barriers o over-
come and oucomes hey seek o achieve, such as increased enrollmen in pre-K
programs, improved classroom eaching, raining parnerships ha lead o
degrees or cerificaions, or career navigaion services, o name a ew.80Such a
sraegy would allow saes o uilize Workorce Innovaion and Opporuniy
Ac, or WIOA, unding as par o he iniiaive. (see below)
Target smaller educational funding streams to Promise Zones. In order o
address educaional dispariies, saes mus ocus on allocaing unds based on
needs. However, where here are smaller dedicaed pos o unding, such as or
afer-school programs, saes should give prioriy access o Promise Zones, givenhe ac ha his unding will have o be argeed anyway. (see he secion on
compeiive ederal unding sources below)
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
27/47
24 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Outline expectations for how state colleges and universities should participate
in the Promise Zones initiative. For pre-K-12 educaion, communiies should
develop plans wih local educaion agencies and leverage he resources o local
colleges. In addiion, saes should assess he srengh o parnerships beween
iniiaive leaders and colleges and universiies. Tis can include speciying
cerain agreemens hrough a leter or memorandum o undersanding and/orindicaing wha kind o resources hese insiuions will devoe o he effor.
Support workforce development efforts that align with employer needs and
increase access to jobs. In erms o workorce developmen, privae-secor
leaders, workorce invesmen boards, raining providers, and communiy
colleges provide a number o key resources o he workorce developmen
sysem. Communiies should ouline how hese roles and resources will be
uilized o implemen new workorce sraegies ha increase access o jobs, such
as placemen services, he developmen o sof skillsapplied skills such as
eamwork, decision making, and communicaion81or communiy-levelsuppor o help residens keep jobs. Furhermore, much o he financing o
public schools and workorce developmen services comes rom boh he sae
and local levels. In prioriizing suppor or sae Promise Zones, poenial
designees should illusrae how hey plan o leverage sae and local resources as
par o heir plans.
Establish subsidized jobs in Promise Zones to help families and the economy.
As our colleagues a he Cener on Budge and Policy Prioriies and he Cener
or Law and Social Policy have underscored,82saes can use exising unds under
he emporary Assisance or Needy Families, or ANF, program o creae
subsidized employmen opporuniies or low-income and disadvanaged workers.
One o he resources ha saes can offer o designaed Promise Zones wihin
heir borders is ederal and sae ANF dollars ha can be used o creae subsidized
jobs programs in hese communiies ha parner wih privae and nonprofi
employers o creae job opporuniies in high-unemploymen neighborhoods.
Create city-state resource hubs to help screen residents for benefits eligibility
and connect them with the benefits they qualify for but are not receiving. For
example, six new BenePhilly Ceners have opened across Philadelphia,Pennsylvania, o screen low-income residens or ederal, sae, and local benefis
and services or which hey are eligible and o assis hem wih he applicaion
process. Saes can give preerence o Promise Zones ineresed in adoping his
model as par o heir plans.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
28/47
25 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Create financial empowerment centers to help residents build personal assets.
According o a Federal Reserve survey conduced las year, only 48 percen o
Americans would be able o cover an unexpeced expense o $400 wihou
borrowing money or selling somehing.83In response o he growing need o
help amilies build heir asses, here has been an increase in financial empower-
men ceners, where residens can work one on one wih coaches o developplans or paying down deb, opening a bank accoun, and saving or he uure.
Te firs o hese ceners opened in New York wih a gran in 2008, and he
ceners are now a publicly unded par o ciy governmen conraced hrough
local nonprofis, having served more han 10,000 cliens.84Similar o he
resource hubs, saes can give preerence o Promise Zones ineresed in creaing
financial empowermen ceners as par o heir plans.
Available federal resources
The 21st Century Community Learning Center, or 21st CCLC, grans suppor he
creaion o communiy learning ceners ha provide afer-school academic
enrichmen opporuniies, paricularly or sudens who atend high-povery
and low-perorming schools.85Sae educaional agencies, or SEAs, which
receive unds rom his program hrough ormula grans, manage saewide
compeiions o award grans o local educaional agencies or nonprofis.86
Saes can give prioriy access o heir sae Promise Zones o pursue innovaive
educaional programming. By providing a seady and reliable sream o unding,
communiies can es innovaive ways o suppor childrens learning wihou
having o ollow a prescripive model.87For example, an evaluaion o Enhanced
Academic Insrucion in Afer-School Programs in 21s CCLC-unded ceners
a wo-year mah and reading program ha arges children in second hrough
fifh grade who perorm below grade levelalso examined oucomes relaed o
academic perormance. Te mah curriculum in paricular suppored an approach
o learning beyond radiional educaional mehods, which was shown o have
posiive impacs on youhs mah es scores.88
School Improvement Grants, or SIGs,are grans awarded o SEAs ha in urn
make compeiive subgrans o local educaional agencies commited o raisinghe achievemen o sudens in heir lowes-perorming schools.89For example,
in Balimore Ciy Public Schools, SIG unds helped pay or addiional school saff
members who provide argeed inervenions or a-risk sudens in SIG schools. 90
In addiion, Balimore Ciy schools have used unds or enrichmen aciviies o
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
29/47
26 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
build greaer connecions beween sudens and he school communiy, which
can help miigae discipline problems.91Saes ineresed in esablishing Promise
Zones can similarly give prioriy access o hese unds in order o help serve he
paricular needs o high-povery schools.
WIOA,which recenly passed, also provides new opporuniies or saes andlocaliies o capialize on ederal resources or workorce developmen aciviies.
Saes ineresed in designaing Promise Zones wihin heir borders should
consider how he new resources and guidelines under he law could be bes
leveraged o suppor pahways o living-wage jobs or residens o high-povery
communiies. For example, under WIOA, saes are requesed o sraegically
align heir workorce developmen programs92and o submi a our-year sraegy
or aligning he core educaion and raining programs o mee he needs o
employers so ha here are jobs on he oher side o raining programs.
Imporanly, WIOA also encourages workorce developmen programs o be
coordinaed wih regional economic developmen sraegies, urging saes oideniy regions or ocus.
Tis guidance should spur saes o align heir our-year sraegy plans wih
effors o atrac capial and jobs o disressed communiies, as well as o address
ransporaion barriers ha residens o poor neighborhoods may ace in
connecing o regional labor-marke opporuniies. WIOA also offers flexibiliy
or saes and localiies o use unding oward effecive sraegies such as regisered
appreniceships, ransiional jobs, and on-he-job raining, and i requires sae
and local Workorce Invesmen Boards, or WIBs, o align heir workorce
programs. In addiion, new provisions under WIOA suppor saewide youh
aciviies around financial lieracy, including suppor in creaing budges,
creaing savings plans, and undersanding credi repors and financial producs.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
30/47
27 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
States play a critical role in administering federally funded work and income supports, and
the policy choices they adopt have a real effect on the ability of low-income families to
access needed services and supports. In addition, states can play a critical role in helping
low-income families save for the future. The following strategies would help enhance the
work of state Promise Zones and would benefit struggling families and spur economic
opportunity across a given state.
Streamline access to critical work and income supports and reduce states
administrative costs by building upon lessons learned from demonstrations
such as the Work Support Strategies initiative.Under this project, six states are
implementing new methods to better coordinate access to work and income supports,
which is a win for low-income families, the state budget, and the state economy. Early
results from this collaboration between leading foundations, policy thinkers, and state
governments are promising in both red and blue states. For example, South Carolina
implemented Express Lane Eligibility, which enabled the state to recertify children for
health coverage based on their eligibility for other programs, even if methods for deter-
mining eligibility differed slightly from those generally used by Medicaid and CHIP.93This
policy change not only enabled tens of thousands of low-income South Carolinian children
to keep their health care coverage, but it also saved the state more than $1 million in
administrative costs, as fewer children coming on and off health insurance meant the state
had to process fewer applications.94The state now has a Medicaid state plan amendment
wherein it can use records from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or
SNAPformerly known as food stampsand TANF to identify children who are eligibile
for Medicaid and enroll them in health coverage.
Enact or expand a state Earned Income Tax Credit, or EITC, and improvetax-time outreach in state Promise Zones areas. A total of 26 states currently have
state EITCs, which build off the successful federal program that lifted approximately 6.5
million people out of poverty in 2012. States that have not yet enacted a state EITC should
consider adopting one, and states that have already enacted a state-level EITC should
considering expanding it. In all cases, states can invest resources in Promise Zones areas to
expand outreach efforts to encourage families to file a tax return. They should also invest in
free tax-preparation help, increasing the share of low-wage working families who benefit
from this successful policy.95
Income supports
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
31/47
28 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Safe and healthy communities
Research shows ha a persons ZIP code has more o do wih lie expecancy han
geneics.96In ac, children in poor amilies are abou seven imes more likely o be
in poor or air healh han children in middle-income amilies.97Oher findings
indicae ha lower-income children experience higher raes o ashma, hearcondiions, hearing problems, digesive disorders, and elevaed levels o lead in he
blood.98As a resul, i is criical o address he social deerminans o healh, such as
higher levels o polluion, exposure o violence, and living in so-called ood desers.
Potential state actions
Require localities to develop a plan for conducting a community health needs
assessment, or CHNA. Given he ac ha issues relaed o healh and saey span
various sae and local agenciesrom housing auhoriies o environmenalagencies o police deparmenshis is an area where saes should expec
communiies o develop comprehensive plans ha address hese inerlocking
issues and leverage available unding sreams. Nonprofi hospials are already
required o conduc a CHNA. As a resul, localiies should describe how hey
plan o coordinae wih heir local hospials, which could include submiting a
memorandum o undersanding or describing how he resuls o he hospials
CHNAs will be used. For example, in 2011, Samord Hospial in Connecicu
and he Samord Deparmen o Healh and Social Services collaboraed o
conduc a CHNA hrough inensive sudies and inerviews.99Tis collaboraive
process resuled in our communiy healh prioriy areas: healh and wellness;
chronic disease; menal healh and subsance abuse, also known as behavioral
healh; and access o services.100
Require localities to prioritize resilience measures in their community develop-
ment efforts. Te Federal Emergency Managemen Agency, or FEMA, will soon
release new guidance or Sae Hazard Miigaion Plans ha calls upon saes o
consider he impacs o climae change in heir planning effors.101Climae-
ueled exreme weaher is par o he new normal, cosing saes millions o
dollars in disaser recovery every year and disproporionaely huring low-income communiies.102As a resul, saes should include requiremens or
Promise Zones o build resilience ino heir communiy developmen sraegies
and inrasrucure plans ha align wih sae prioriies.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
32/47
29 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Support efforts that deter crime.Addressing crime is a highly localized issue
ha varies beween communiies across he counry. However, saes can
suppor sraegies ha ocus on deerring crime, such as using daa o ideniy
and monior so-called ho spos and improving communicaion beween law
enorcemen and communiies. In addiion, successul prisoner re-enry should
be hough o as a public saey issue and an employmen issue, no jus acorrecions issue.
Enact reforms around the use of criminal records.A criminal record can be a
lielong barrier o economic securiy and mobiliy, having adverse effecs on
amilies, communiies, and he economy as a whole. A recen CAP repor iled
One Srike and Youre Ou: How We Can Eliminae Barriers o Economic
Securiy and Mobiliy or People wih Criminal Records oulines a number o
policies o ensure Americans wih criminal records have opporuniies or a
decen lie, while reducing recidivism and ulimaely srenghening communi-
ies. For insance, saes can enac policies o bar landlords rom discriminaingagains enans because o heir criminal records; pass senencing reorms o
reduce incarceraion raes while saving axpayer dollars and enhancing public
saey; and pass legislaion o proec job applicans, including ban he box
effors ha delay background checks unil afer job seekers are being considered
or posiions. Such policies will enhance he public saey measures ha Promise
Zones designees enac, while helping individuals and amilies saewide.
Available federal resources
Affordable Care Act. Nonprofi hospials are required o provide benefis o he
communiies hey serve in order o keep heir ax-exemp saus. Naionwide,
abou 2,900 hospials, or 60 percen, are nonprofi. Te financial benefi o being
ax exemp is esimaed o be worh $12.6 billion annually.103Hisorically, many
o hospials communiy-benefi aciviies have been relaed o chariy care. Te
new requiremens in he Affordable Care Ac go beyond improving healh o
include greaer accounabiliy or hospials, more effecive use o resources, and
building communiy capaciy and engagemen o address healh issues.104As
par o his effor, nonprofi hospials mus coninue o conduc a CHNA aleas every hree years. Tey also mus develop a sraegy o mee hose needs.
Communiy benefis ha qualiy nonprofi hospials or ederal ax exempion
include:
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
33/47
30 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Free and discouned care o uninsured and low-income paiens Paymen shoralls or services provided o Medicaid paiensAciviies o improve healh in he communiy he hospial serves Programs o increase access o care, such as subsidized healh services Medical research
Educaing healh proessionals105
Hospials and local leaders should use his renewed commimen o providing
communiy benefis as an opporuniy o ully explore he range o social
deerminans o healh and he rue needs o heir communiies.106
In addiion, he Deparmen o Healh and Human Services announced $60
million in Navigaor gran awards o 90 organizaions in saes wih ederally
aciliaed and sae parnership markeplaces.107Tese grans are mean o
suppor organizaions in doing oureach aciviies in he second year o enroll-
men o ensure ha more people gain access o affordable healh care.According o a recen survey, organizaions providing assisance in boh
sae-based and ederally aciliaed insurance markeplaces were responsible or
helping an esimaed 10.6 million consumers apply or coverage in markeplace
plans, Medicaid, or CHIP during he firs open enrollmen period o he
Affordable Care Ac.108Poenial Promise Zones applicans should work wih
organizaions ha have received Navigaor unds o ensure hey are working on
comprehensive plans geared oward improving healh oucomes or residens.
The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant, or JAG, Programis he
leading source o ederal jusice unding o sae and local jurisdicions o
suppor a range o program areas, including law enorcemen; cour proceed-
ings; prevenion and educaion; correcions; drug reamen and enorcemen;
planning, evaluaion, and echnology improvemen; and crime vicim and
winess iniiaives.109For example, Illinois prisons are over capaciy, wih he
majoriy o prisoners arresed or nonviolen drug or propery crimes.110As a
resul, in 2009, he Adul Redeploy Illinois program was esablished wih Byrne
JAG unds as a way o reduce recidivism and save he sae money by promoing
local alernaives o incarceraion. In exchange or unding and echnical
assisance, localiies agree o reduce he number o people sen o sae prisonsby 25 percen or more.111Wihin is firs wo years, he program divered 987
offenders and saved he sae an esimaed $16.9 million.112Paricipaing
counies develop a sraegic plan ha idenifies he argeed offender populaion
and gaps in services and sancions.113
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
34/47
31 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Housing and infrastructure
One o he bigges challenges many amilies ace is finding and securing affordable
housing, or housing or low- o moderae-income households in which occupans
pay no more han 30 percen o heir income. Currenly, here is a shorage o
more han 5 million housing unis or exremely low-income reners.119Te
challenge o finding housing ha mees he basic needs o amilies is exacerbaed
by he ac ha much o he naions affordable housing sock is no linked o he
ransporaion opions necessary o access employmen opporuniies and criical
services. o make maters worse, housing and ransporaion coss have increased
aser han incomes over he pas decade, while low-income neighborhoods ofen
have less reliable and underinvesed public ransporaion.120In addiion o
ransporaion, he naions inrasrucureincluding sewer, waer, and elecric
sysemsis in disrepair. I is esimaed ha $262 billion per year in spending over
he nex 10 years is needed o fix he naions inrasrucure.121I is no surprising,
hen, ha he American Sociey o Civil Engineers gave U.S. inrasrucure a D+or 2013.122A srong inrasrucure is criical o suppor peoples everyday lives, as
well as o connec communiies wih opporuniies.
The Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies national Place
Matters initiative has yielded some local best practices for developing
plans to address disparities in health. Given the significant health
inequities that exist in Alameda County, California, by race, ethnicity,
and income, County Supervisor Keith Carsons office and the Alameda
County Public Health Department launched Alameda County Place
Matters, an initiative that addresses community conditions through
local policy change.114Place Matters actively partners with local
organizations and community leaders to identify current issues and
policy interventions focused on income, education, housing, criminal
justice, land use, and transportation policy areas.115Place Matters
studies the links between these various policy issues and health
concerns and responds to community requests for policy analysis.116
For example, fear of landlord retaliation, displacement, and dep
tion forces many low-income people of color to remain in unsa
housing conditions where they are exposed to hazards such as
lead, and rodents. Alameda Countys Place Matters Housing Wo
group partnered with government and community organizatio
advance the widespread adoption of a proactive approach to r
inspection, including improving the citys code-enforcement
practices.117Work is also underway to incorporate a health focu
a variety of policies and practices, including land-use planning
completing a health impact assessment on education funding
models, and conducting a health impact assessment on fundin
local public transportation.118
Best practice: Community health
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
35/47
32 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Potential state actions
Consider policies to enable and promote the rehabilitation of affordable
housing.Affordable housing is increasingly scarce, and building i is an uphill
batle. For every new affordable aparmen creaed, wo are los due o deeriora-
ion, abandonmen, or conversion o more expensive housing.123
However,rehabiliaing an exising affordable aparmen can cos one-hird less han
building a new one.124As a resul, saes should require localiies o develop
plans or preserving publicly ownedor privaely subsidizedaffordable
housing. However, while local building codes govern new consrucion, many
saes do no have codes or rehabiliaion. Wihou specific and consisen
guidance, he rehabiliaion o older properies ofen mus conorm o he same
sandards as new consrucion, sandards ha do no accommodae he specific
needs and challenges o updaing older homes. Saes should ensure ha heir
building codes no only allow or bu also encourage he rehabiliaion o older
homes.125
Review and update regulatory policies to reduce barriers for development.
Saes and localiies can reduce coss or developers and keep rens affordable by
addressing oudaed regulaory barriers, such as single-use zoning, low-densiy
limis, and parking requiremens on propery near ransi. Mos local zoning
regulaions limi or prohibi higher-densiy developmen, and when such
developmens are allowed, hey are ofen segregaed rom oher housing ypes
and schools. As a resul, saes should give preerence during he applicaion
process o localiies ha work o overcome regulaory barriers o mee curren
housing needs.126Sae or local unding can also be used as direc ren subsidies,
atached o a porion o unis in new developmens or awarded o enans.
Protect households from displacement.While affordable renal housing is
criical, a number o low-income residens in high-povery communiies own
heir own homes. As a resul, i is imporan ha as Promise Zones develop hey
include plans o help proec hese households rom increasing propery axes.
Some communiies have urned o so-called circui-breaker programs, which,
like he elecrical devices ha shu off power o preven circuis rom overload-
ing, preven propery axes rom overloading a amilys budge by shutingoff propery axes once hey exceed a cerain share o he amilys income.127
Tese programs give direc propery ax relie o low-income homeowners who
are longime residens. Saes could consider implemening hese programs
saewide bu should consider Promise Zones applicans ha have similar plans
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
36/47
33 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
o comba displacemen.
Support greater access to transportation throughout the Promise Zones
initiative. Saes should require heir Promise Zones applicans o ouline how
planners and ransporaion officials will address inrasrucure challenges while
ensuring ha low-income populaions benefi rom hose plans. Qualiy oservice is criical or localiies o connec residens o opporuniy, such as he
saey o sysems, mainenance, he modernizaion o imeables o reflec
nonradiional work schedules, and more. For rural areas, his means filling gaps
in he sysem, which could include piloing car-sharing programs. Unorunaely,
sae ransporaion agencies overwhelmingly ocus on saewide highway
neworks, leaving aside regional mobiliy. o address his shorcoming, saes
should empower meropolian and rural ransporaion planning organizaions
wih addiional mode-neural unding and projec-selecion auhoriy.
Ensure a greater connection between transportation and housing development.Saes should require heir Promise Zones applicans o provide deailed plans
o coordinae he ofen-disparae aciviies and invesmens o housing and
ransporaion agencies. Saes can also require regional housing, ransporaion,
and planning organizaions o inegrae and synchronize heir planning cycles o
ensure ha limied resources reinorce housing and mobiliy goals raher han
counerac one anoher. Inegraed planning will no happen overnigh, as many
regional auhoriies have limied saffing. As a resul, deparmens o ranspora-
ion should be prepared o provide guidance and echnical assisance o rans-
poraion effors incorporaed ino he iniiaive.128
Available federal resources
The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, or LIHTC. Since is creaion in 1986, he
LIHC has leveraged more han $100 billion in privae invesmen capial
hrough a dollar-or-dollar reducion in a developers ax liabiliy, providing
criical financing or he developmen o more han 2.5 million affordable renal
homes.129Te program annually suppors 95,000 jobs and finances approxi-
maely 90 percen o all affordable renal housing.130
Moreover, i is viewed as acriical resource o ransorm communiies suffering rom bligh.131Because
saes have he auhoriy o esablish crieria or he ax credis, sae leaders
should work wih he sae housing agencies o give preerence hrough he
ederal LIHC program o privae developers ha build affordable housing in
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
37/47
34 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
he zone. Prioriizing developmens in Promise Zones is consisen wih ederal
policies ha encourage saes o prioriize allocaion o LIHC developmens in
concered communiy revializaion areas.132
The CDBGis a flexible program ha provides communiies wih resources o
address a wide range o unique communiy developmen needs, rom housing ogreen inrasrucure upgrades. Each CDBG-unded aciviy mus mee a leas
one o he programs hree naional objecives: (1) benefi low- and moderae-
income people; (2) aid in he prevenion or eliminaion o slums or bligh; and
(3) address an urgen need ha poses a serious hrea o he healh or welare o
a communiy or which no oher unding is available.133Saes ha paricipae in
he CDBG program award grans o general local governmens o carry ou
developmen aciviies. Saes are responsible or ormulaing communiy
developmen objecives, deciding how o disribue unds among communiies
in nonenilemen areas, and ensuring ha recipien communiies comply wih
applicable sae and ederal laws and requiremens. Beween 2005 and 2013,CDBG unding suppored improvemens o public aciliies ha benefied more
han 33.7 million people.134For example, in Someron, Arizona, CDBG unds
allocaed hrough he sae allowed he ciy o purchase and insall solar panels
o provide energy o is waer-reamen plan as par o a sraegy o reduce
energy coss. So ar, he ciy has saved an average o $20,000 per year while
curbing energy use.135
Currently, there is a shortage of more than 5 million affordable
housing units for low-income families across the country. Further-
more, only one in four families that qualify for federal housing
assistance currently receives it,136and nearly two-thirds of extremely
low-income renters spend 50 percent or more of their monthly
incomes on housing.137Housing affordability is exacerbated by
regulatory constraints on expanding the housing supply, including
limitations of land, lengthy and complicated approval processes, and
low-density zoning.138
In Montgomery County, Maryland, mandatory inclusionary zoning
programs have required developers to set aside a percentage of
affordable housing units in market-rate developments for the l
years. The countys Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit, or MPDU,
program requires new developments with 20 or more housing
to be made up of 12.5 percent to 15 percent MPDUs to ensure
developers are creating affordable housing.139Households mus
between $30,000 and $81,500 per year to rent an MPDU.140Un
sale have 30-year affordability terms that can be renewed if the
sold to a new household within the price-control period.141Wh
productivity is limited, the program is nationally recognized asthe most successful inclusionary zone ordinances, producing a
average of 368 MPDUs per year and more than 13,000 units ov
life of the program9,300 for sale and 4,000 rental units.142
Best practice: Incentivizing affordable housing
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
38/47
35 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Conclusion
Te ederal Promise Zones model capializes on years o research and experimen-
aion in undersanding how o revialize low-income urban, rural, and ribal
communiies. However, he goal o he iniiaive is no only o ransorm he
seleced zones bu also o demonsrae new ways leaders can work wih local
communiies. Sae leaders have a vesed ineres in ackling concenraed povery
wihin heir borders, and he Promise Zones model provides a naural ramework
or doing so.
Forunaely, saes are already equipped o esablish sae Promise Zones. Saes
and localiies underake mos o he direc spending on public goods and services
and bear primary responsibiliy or invesmens in educaion, social services, and
inrasrucure.143In addiion, saes adminiser a significan amoun o ederal
discreionary unding, wih sae leaders having broad auhoriy over compeiive
ederal unding sreams. Sae leaders can give sae Promise Zones designees
prioriy access o hese unds, allowing hem o deploy hese resources more
sraegically. By adoping his model, sae leaders can complemen he work o
ederal povery programs and ensure resources are leveraged o be greaer han he
sum o heir pars, boosing economic mobiliy and opporuniy in ways ha no
only benefi amilies bu saes as well.
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
39/47
36 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
Appendix
Examining the Enterprise Zone model
Since he 1960s, he communiy developmen secor has made a grea impac by
leveraging billions o dollars in privae capial o build millions o affordable
housing unis and o oser place-based work across he counry. Over he years,
he place-based policy ha has atraced he mos atenion rom researchers is
Enerprise Zonesgeographical areas designaed by ederal or local governmen
officials o give financial incenives, such as ax benefis, o businesses ha locaein or hire workers wihin he zone.144Originaing in Grea Briain in he 1970s, he
Enerprise Zone idea spread hroughou he Unied Saes during he 1990s. A
he ederal level, he Empowermen Zone, or EZ, and Enerprise Communiy, or
EC, iniiaives were creaed in 1993 o reduce unemploymen and o generae
economic growh hrough he designaion o ederal ax incenives and gran
awards o disressed communiies.145
Local, ribal, and sae governmens ineresed in paricipaing in Enerprise Zone
programs were required o presen comprehensive plans or promoing economic
developmen.146Localiies seleced o paricipae in he programs would hen lead
projecs ha promoed economic developmen in heir disressed communiies.
Urban Empowermen Zones received $100 million grans and rural Empowermen
Zones received $40 million grans.147Localiies no seleced or his program could
qualiy or he Enerprise Communiies iniiaive, which had less-generous hiring
credis and grans o around $3 million.148Overall, ederal expendiures via hiring
credis and block grans or he firs six years o he programs were esimaed a
abou $142 per zone residen each year.149
However, sudies are divided on wheher he Empowermen Zone programs weresuccessul. According o research rom he Universiy o Michigan and Yale
Universiy, Empowermen Zones creaed significan benefis in job growh and
wages.150Research ou o Ken Sae Universiy, meanwhile, suggess ha any gains
only benefied higher-income households.151Ye anoher sudy ou o he Universiy
8/21/2019 A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
40/47
37 Center for American Progress | A Framework for State-Level Promise Zones
o Caliornia, Berkeley, ha compared rejeced and uure applicans o he
Empowermen Zone program wih acual designees ound ha he Empowermen
Zone designaion subsanially increased employmen in zone neighborhoods and
generaed wage increases or local workers.152Te sory, complee wih mixed
resuls,