Transcript
Page 1: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

To the adaptive multibody gravity assists tours design in Jovian system for the Ganymede Landing. Grushevskii A.

Page 2: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Grushevskii A.V.,Golubev Yu.F, Koryanov V.V., Tuchin A.G.

To the adaptive multibody gravity assist tours design in Jovian system for the Ganymede

Landing

24th International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics,May 5-9, 2014

Keldysh Institute of Applied MathematicsRussian Academy of Sciences

Page 3: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

ESA- JUICE MISSION

Page 4: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

ESA- JUICE Mission Debut

Interplanetary part-Ganymede Flyby-JOI-G&C-Flyby SequenceGOI

Page 5: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Roskosmos part: +Ganymede Landing

Flexible JOI Data Flexible G&C-Flyby Sequence GOI Ganymede Circular Orbit Landing

Page 6: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

MAIN PROBLEMS

Page 7: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Roscosmos part: Ganymede Landing. Resonance beginning. Typical scenario

ESTK complex of Keldysh IAM RAS Ballistic CenterNavigation and Ancillary Information Facility (NAIF) - NASARefined Flyby Model

Moon Orbital period of SC after the satellite flyby rated to satellite’s orbital period

Number of rounds after a flyby

Ganymede 6 1Ganymede 5 2Ganymede 4 1Ganymede 3 1Ganymede 2.5 2Ganymede 2 1

Page 8: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Quasi-Singularity of the Radiation Hazard

Page 9: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Joining to Jovian System After Interplanetary Part

Time of Jovian sphere of action2029/06/03 09:25:10 UTC

Flyby hyperbola ( J2000) Semimajor axe, km 5252.572592 Eccentricity 1.163115 Inclination 23.44 grad V-Infinity, km/s 4.91 Pericenter Time 2029/08/29 17:20:35 UTC Pericenter altitude 12.5 RJ

Page 10: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

1 GAM (near Ganymede)

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/04/25 12:55:52Minimal distance 18.119618 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 15.485618 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.794698Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.040897Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 42.915096 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 11.503787Eccentricity after flyby 0.767555Velocity in pericenter after flyby 16.511564Velocity in apocenter after flyby 2.171381

Vx=0.000755, Vy= 0.005958, Vz=0.003207, |V|=0.006808

IO

Europa

Ganymede

Callisto

Page 11: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

2 GAM

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/06/07 11:18:06Minimal distance 13.702676 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 11.068676 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.761808Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.046064Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 35.762581 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 11.268810Eccentricity after flyby 0.742874Velocity in pericenter after flyby 16.565945Velocity in apocenter after flyby 2.443969

Vx-0.004218, Vy=0.002570, Vz=0.001342, |V|=0.005118

Page 12: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

3 GAM

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/08/18 00:23:08Minimal distance 9.464318 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 6.830318 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.747614Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.057707Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 28.610065 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 10.908290Eccentricity after flyby 0.711178Velocity in pericenter after flyby 16.683664Velocity in apocenter after flyby 2.815964

Vx=-0.014865, Vy=0.012230, Vz=0.004934, |V|=0.019872

Page 13: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/09/15 15:30:37Minimal distance 6.338138 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 3.704138 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.724214Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.078352Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 21.457549 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 10.356952Eccentricity after flyby 0.667801Velocity in pericenter after flyby 16.903565Velocity in apocenter after flyby 3.366919

Vx=-0.003701, Vy=0.003109, Vz=0.001477, |V|=0.005055

4 GAM

Page 14: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

5 GAM

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/10/07 02:25:05Minimal distance 8.641858 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 6.007858 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.746652Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.068217Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 17.881290 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 9.929413Eccentricity after flyby 0.640352Velocity in pericenter after flyby 17.120993Velocity in apocenter after flyby 3.753786

Vx=-0.001707, Vy=0.005016, Vz=0.002694, |V|=0.005944

Page 15: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

6 GAM

Time of minimal distance reaching 2030/11/12 04:29:38Minimal distance 6.051283 1000 kmHeight of pericenter of flyby hyperbola 3.417283 1000 kmAsymptotic velocity 6.727114Change of velocity relatively to Jupiter -0.095345Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 14.305032 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 9.273662Eccentricity after flyby 0.610227Velocity in pericenter after flyby 17.552545Velocity in apocenter after flyby 4.248788

Vx=-0.006027, Vy=0.003142, Vz=-0.000433, |V|=0.006811

Page 16: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Quasi-Singularity of the Radiation Hazard

Page 17: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Gravity-assist sequence. Effective Type T1

Page 18: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34103

104

105

106

107

108

109

L, RJ

f e, 1/(

cм2

c)

> 0.5 MэB

> 2

> 5

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34100

101

102

103

104

105

106

L, RJ

Дo

зa, p

/cyт

ки

1 г/cм2

2.2

5

RADIATION HAZARD PROBLEM (M. Podzolko e.a., SINP MSU Data)

Page 19: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Typical radiation hazard analysis on the ENDGAME phase

Dynamics of the radiation accumulation

Page 20: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Typical radiation hazard analysis on the ENDGAME phase

Dynamics of the radiation accumulation- zoom scale

Page 21: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Dynamics of the radiation accumulation- on one orbit. Quasi-singularity

Period after flyby of GANYMEDE 42.9 daysDistance in pericenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 11.5Distance in apocenter rated to Jupiter’s radius 98.0

Page 22: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Ti (Tisserand’s Criterion)

212 (1 ) cosJ a e i T

a

Restricted 3 Body ProblemJacobi Integral J Tisserands Parameter T (see R.Russel, S.Campagnola)

2 23(1 ) 3J T v v

“Isoinfine” (“Captivity”)

Page 23: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Tisserand-Poincare graph(N.Strange, J.Sims, K.Kloster, J.Longuski axes Rp-T

(A.Labunskii, O.Papkov, K.Sukhanov axes Ra-Rp- the same)

Page 24: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

TP-strategy(axes Ra-Rp in RJ)

Page 25: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

CB-Classic Billiard

Duplex ShuttingCGB-Classic Gravitational Billiard

Page 26: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Using PHASE BEAM method of Gravity Assists Sequences Determination

Page 27: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Previous front trees of Tisserand graphfor Russian “Laplace” mission

Page 28: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Previous Tisserand Graph for the Roscosmos “Laplace” mission

Page 29: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Phase Selection

• We need the criterion of selection of encounters for V-infinity reduction

• The “Magic” code is: “Ganymede”+”Not Ganymede”+”Ganymede”

Or “G”^”C”^…^”C”^”G”

Page 30: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Rebounds+ReRebounds (axes Ra-Rp)

Page 31: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Real Phase Searching(axes Ra-Rp in RJ)

Rebounds Rebounds-ReRebounds

Page 32: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

“JUICE” by ESA Tisserand-Poincare typical graph

Page 33: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Research basement

Orbit correction algorithm preceding spacecraft’s Jovian moons gravity assists

Gravity assists refined model ESTK KIAM RAS Ballistic centre

complex Navigation and Ancillary Information

Facility (NAIF) - NASA ephemeris — will be refined during JUICE by ESA

Page 34: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Fly-by sequence selection strategy

Lambert problem solution; The phase-beams method; Delta V minimizations; Gravity-assist parameters permanent

corrections; Simulations results are presented.

Page 35: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Gravity-assist sequence. Effective Type T1

Page 36: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Part II of radiation-comfortable tour

Page 37: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Low-radiation sequence type T2

Page 38: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Type: Hyper-low-radiation,Expensive Delta V

• T3

Page 39: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

«Endgame»(S.Campagnola, R.Russel, 2011)

Page 40: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Virtual Trajectories Splitting After Swing-by

Page 41: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Applications for Another Kinds of Flybys

Page 42: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

Callisto & Ganymede

Tour design problem lends itself well to optimization schemes

Callisto & Ganymede assists us to minimize fuel requirements

Page 43: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014
Page 44: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014
Page 45: 24 th  International Symphosium on Space Flight Dynamics, May 5-9, 2014

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !