Download pptx - 24, March 2014

Transcript
Page 1: 24, March 2014

24, March 2014

Queue Length Estimation Based on Point Traffic Detector Data and Automatic Vehicle Identification Data

Page 2: 24, March 2014

Contents

Detector Data

AVI data

Case Study 1

Case Study 2

Methods

Page 3: 24, March 2014

FIU/UCF Joint Project Joint project between FIU and UCF

Mohammed Hadi, Ph.D., P.E. (PI) Haitham Al-Deek, Ph.D., P.E. (UCF PI) Omer Tatari, Ph.D (Co-PI) Yan Xiao (Co-PI) Somaye Fakharian (FIU Ph.D. student) Frank A. Consoli, P.E. (UCF Ph.D. Student) John Rogers, P.E. (UCF Ph.D. Student)

Page 4: 24, March 2014

Progress Diagram

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3

Turnpike , 1.8 Mile4 detectorsAll methods

Real World Data

SR 826(0.947, Detectors,0311 mile

Simulation (CORSIM)Real worldComparison of

simulation and real world

Estimation of Density .

Page 5: 24, March 2014

Detector Data

Speed Based Base on speed, the link is 1: Fully congested, if the speed based on both detectors< 40

M/Hr 2: Uncongested: if the speed based on both detectors >= 40 3: Partially Congested: If the speed based on one detector < 40 Volume Based

Arrival vehicle > Departure Vehicle

Page 6: 24, March 2014

AVI Data

Speed Based 1: Average Speed for the segment < 40 is totally

congested 2: Average Speed>= 40 is totally Uncongested

Page 7: 24, March 2014

Combination of Detector and AVI Data

Speed Based 1: For fully congested(based on Detector), average

speed based on AVI 2: For totally uncongested (based on Detector):

average speed based on AVI 3: Partially Congested: base on relationship sped and

travel time, the partial queue is estimated.

Page 8: 24, March 2014

Combination of Detector and AVI Data

Travel Time Based 1: For fully congested(based on AVI), average travel

time is calculated 2: For totally uncongested (based on AVI): average

travel time is calculated 3: Partially Congested: the linear regression for each

travel time between fully congested and fully uncongested.

Page 9: 24, March 2014

Methods For Queue Length Estimation

AVI (Average Speed)

Combination of AVI and Detector(Travel Time and Speed)

Detector (Average Speed and Volume)

Queue Length Estimation

Page 10: 24, March 2014

Case Study 1: (Turnpike)

Page 11: 24, March 2014

Table (Turnpike)Time Tag Detector TT based Speed based6:00:00 0 0 0 06:05:00 0 0 0 06:10:00 0 0 0 06:15:00 0 0 0 06:20:00 0 0 0 06:25:00 0 0 0 06:30:00 0 0 0 06:35:00 0 0 0 06:40:00 0 0 0 06:45:00 0 0 0 06:50:00 1.8 0 0 06:55:00 1.8 0 0 07:00:00 1.8 0.9 0.313948632 0.1462956927:05:00 1.8 0.9 0.507030324 0.3122237667:10:00 1.8 0.9 0.876124726 0.5423039697:15:00 1.8 0.9 1.110667473 0.9821246147:20:00 1.8 0.9 1.407908931 1.2616106817:25:00 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.87:30:00 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.87:35:00 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.87:40:00 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.87:45:00 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.87:50:00 1.8 0.9 1.458528331 0.912547:55:00 1.8 0.9 1.103458913 0.83528:00:00 1.8 0.9 1.141650021 0.6713558:05:00 0 0.9 0.719855752 0.698128:10:00 0 0.9 0.520868962 0.562438:15:00 0 0.9 0.470737984 0.5021338:20:00 0 0.9 0.373952654 0.4990572538:25:00 0 0.9 0.314383157 0.383725828:30:00 0 0.9 0.060792632 0.3127415558:35:00 0 0.9 0.041185117 0.0105577568:40:00 0 0 0 08:45:00 0 0 0 08:50:00 0 0 0 08:55:00 0 0 0 09:00:00 0 0 0 09:05:00 0 0 0 09:10:00 0 0 0 09:15:00 0 0 0 09:20:00 0 0 0 09:25:00 0 0 0 09:30:00 0 0 0 09:35:00 0 0 0 09:40:00 0 0 0 09:45:00 0 0 0 09:50:00 0 0 0 09:55:00 0 0 0 010:00:00 0 0 0 010:05:00 0 0 0 010:10:00 0 0 0 010:15:00 0 0 0 010:20:00 0 0 0 010:25:00 0 0 0 010:30:00 0 0 0 010:35:00 0 0 0 010:40:00 0 0 0 010:45:00 0 0 0 010:50:00 0 0 0 010:55:00 0 0 0 011:00:00 0 0 0 011:05:00 0 0 0 011:10:00 0 0 0 011:15:00 0 0 0 011:20:00 0 0 0 011:25:00 0 0 0 011:30:00 0 0 0 011:35:00 0 0 0 011:40:00 0 0 0 011:45:00 0 0 0 011:50:00 0 0 0 011:55:00 0 0 0 012:00:00 0 0 0 012:05:00 0 0 0 012:10:00 0 0 0 012:15:00 0 0 0 012:20:00 0 0 0 012:25:00 0 0 0 012:30:00 0 0 0 012:35:00 0 0 0 012:40:00 0 0 0 012:45:00 0 0 0 012:50:00 0 0 0 012:55:00 0 0 0 013:00:00 0 0 0 013:05:00 0 0 0 013:10:00 0 0 0 013:15:00 0 0 0 013:20:00 0 0 0 013:25:00 0 0 0 013:30:00 0 0 0 013:35:00 0 0 0 013:40:00 0 0 0 013:45:00 0 0 0 013:50:00 0 0 0 013:55:00 0 0 0 014:00:00 0 0 0 014:05:00 0 0 0 014:10:00 0 0 0 014:15:00 0 0 0 014:20:00 0 0 0 014:25:00 0 0 0 014:30:00 0 0 0 014:35:00 0 0 0 014:40:00 0 0 0 014:45:00 0 0 0 014:50:00 0 0 0 014:55:00 0 0 0 015:00:00 0 0 0 015:05:00 0 0 0 015:10:00 0 0 0 015:15:00 0 0 0 015:20:00 0 0 0 015:25:00 0 0 0 015:30:00 0 0 0 015:35:00 0 0 0 015:40:00 0 0 0 015:45:00 0 0 0 015:50:00 0 0 0 015:55:00 0 0 0 016:00:00 0 0 0 016:05:00 0 0 0 016:10:00 0 0 0 016:15:00 0 0 0 016:20:00 0 0 0 016:25:00 0 0 0 016:30:00 0 0 0 016:35:00 0 0 0 016:40:00 0 0 0 016:45:00 0 0 0 016:50:00 0 0 0 016:55:00 0 0 0 017:00:00 0 0 0 017:05:00 0 0 0 0

Page 12: 24, March 2014

Diagram (Cumulative Volume)

Page 13: 24, March 2014

Diagram (Volume)

Page 14: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Simulation CORSIM)

Based on simulation Sensitivity multiplier by 200% Two link are congested Link 1: o.48 mile Link 2: 0.46 Detector 1: 0.387 mile from upstream Detector 2: 0.23

Page 15: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Simulation CORSIM)

Time Queue Length (speed 30) Queue Length (speed 35) Queue Length (speed 40)10:00:00 0.22219697 0.22219697 0.30837121210:05:00 0.22219697 0.22219697 0.30837121210:10:00 0.22219697 0.22219697 0.30837121210:15:00 0.22219697 0.22219697 0.30837121210:20:00 0.214393939 0.231818182 0.30837121210:25:00 0 0 010:30:00 0 0 010:35:00 0 0 010:40:00 0 0 010:45:00 0 0 010:50:00 0 0 010:55:00 0 0 011:00:00 0 0 011:05:00 0 0 011:10:00 0 0 011:15:00 0 0 011:20:00 0 0 011:25:00 0 0 011:30:00 0 0 011:35:00 0 0 011:40:00 0 0 011:45:00 0 0 011:50:00 0 0 011:55:00 0 0 012:00:00 0 0 012:05:00 0 0 012:10:00 0 0 012:15:00 0 0 012:20:00 0 0 012:25:00 0 0 012:30:00 0 0 012:35:00 0 0 012:40:00 0 0 012:45:00 0 0 012:50:00 0 0 012:55:00 0 0 013:00:00 0 0 013:05:00 0 0 013:10:00 0 0 013:15:00 0 0 013:20:00 0 0 013:25:00 0 0 013:30:00 0 0 013:35:00 0 0 013:40:00 0 0 013:45:00 0 0 0

Page 16: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Simulation CORSIM)

Page 17: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Real world

Based on detector data Based on AVI data, matching each individual

vehicle from link 1 to link 2 All methods are used for Turnpike(Detector, AVI,

Combination of detector and AVI) Cumulative volume (Based on detector data)

Page 18: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Real World)

Page 19: 24, March 2014

Diagram (Cumulative Volume)

Page 20: 24, March 2014

Case Study 2: (SR 826- Comparison of Simulation and Real World)

Page 21: 24, March 2014

Density Estimation

Page 22: 24, March 2014

Question?

AVI Detector

Combination

Page 23: 24, March 2014