2008 General MeetingAssemblée générale 2008
Toronto, Ontario
2008 General MeetingAssemblée générale 2008
Toronto, Ontario
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
Canadian Institute
of Actuaries
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
L’Institut canadien desactuaires
2
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
• Notice of Intent• Issued: September 3, 2008• Comment deadline: November 14, 2008• Covers:
• SOP Section 3000
• Except Commuted Values
• Draft Standards are appended• Generally consistent with PPFRC Working
Document of March 2007
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
3
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Role of Actuarial Standards re: Funding• Determination of minimum/maximum
contributions per legal requirements• Advice regarding alternative funding levels
per terms of engagement• Required disclosures regarding funded status
and associated risks
4
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Enhanced Disclosures (External User Report)• Required in all reports, unless wind-up benefit are not
defined or a designated plan covering only “connected” persons
• Hypothetical wind-up funded status under a maximum cost scenario (currently required)
• Hypothetical wind-up or solvency valuation simplified gain/loss
• Hypothetical wind-up or solvency service cost
• Risk analysis
5
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Going Concern Valuations• May be required by terms of engagement or by law (as
currently required for registered plans) but not by SOP
• Assumptions, best estimate or including margins for adverse deviations (MFAD)
• Separate General SOP project likely to require “Independently Reasonable Assumptions” before Pension SOP is concluded
• Discount rates may reflect expected return on pension fund assets but CIA guidance on maximum discount rates is contemplated
6
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Going Concern Valuations (Continued)• MFADs may not be required depending on
circumstances
• The extent of MFAD in each significant assumption is to be disclosed
• Smoothed asset values permitted but disclosure of funded status using market value required
• Concept of consistency between asset valuation method and discount rate is removed
7
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Draft SOP Contents
3200 Advice on the Financial Condition, Financial Position, Funded Status or
Funding of a Pension Plan• includes going concern, hypothetical wind-up
and solvency valuations• includes external user reporting requirements
3300 Full or Partial Wind-up of a Registered Plan
3400 Accounting for Pension CostsSubstantial re-organization from current SOP, a cross reference table is provided
8
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Circumstances of the Work
• Whether advice relates to the financial condition, financial position, funded status, funding or a combination thereof
• The terms of engagement (may include a formal or informal funding policy)
• The law
• The objectives of funding (if the work is related to funding)
9
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Objectives of Funding
• Primary: systematic accumulation of dedicated assets (security)
• Other: may be specified by terms of engagement e.g. orderly and rational allocation, inter generational equity
10
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Actuarial Cost Methods
• Not restricted to going concern valuations
• Limitation that forecast method not to be used for registered plan valuations is eliminated
• Specification that forecast period sufficiently long that the “valuation reflect the long term cost allocation pattern” is eliminated
• Specific requirement to include salary projection for final average plans is eliminated
11
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards• Other Draft SOP Changes
• Terminology
• Definition of funded status is introduced relative to going concern valuation
• difference between value of assets, and actuarial present value of projected benefits allocated to periods up to the calculation date
• No reference to “liabilities” which are reflected in a statement of “financial position”
• The actuarial present value of projected benefits allocated to periods up to the calculation date is more in the nature of a “funding target” than a “liability”
12
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Hypothetical Wind-up Valuations
• Assets valued at Market Value vs. Liquidation Value for actual wind-up
• Explicit assumption for expenses is required
• Details on postulation of scenarios, recognition of contingent benefits, disregard of extremely unlikely scenarios
13
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Actual Wind-up Valuations
• Contemplates possibility of unspecified settlement methods other than commuted value or annuity purchase
• Eliminates proviso that wind-up expenses may be ignored if funded ratio over 100%
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
14
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Other Draft SOP Changes• Accounting Valuations
• Reporting requirements may be satisfied by reference to a funding valuation report e.g. data or plan provisions
15
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Educational Guidance• The following topics are contemplated:
• Hypothetical wind-up service cost and gain/loss
• Risk analysis
• Discount rates for going concern valuations
16
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
Future Timeline
Comment Deadline: November 14, 2008
Release of Exposure: Draft, targeted
March 2009
Final Decisions of: ASB
2009
Implementation Date: TBD
17
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
2008
Gen
eral
Mee
ting
Ass
embl
ée g
énér
ale
2008
Actuarial Standards Board – Pension Specific Standards
• Process• Joint ASB/PPFRC Working Group established by ASB
as the “designated group” for the Standard
• The Working Group is supported by Chris Fievoli, CIA Resident Actuary to compile comments
• PPFRC responsible for developing Educational Notes for approval by Practice Council