14th Annual International Legislators Forum
EPA Carbon Regulation
June 26, 2014
Eric J. OlsenVice President and General Counsel
Great River Energy
Presentation Outline
• Great River Energy and electric cooperative background
• Potential impact of the proposed rule on GRE
• GRE’s action plan regarding the proposed regulations
GRE and our membership
28 member cooperatives – 1.7 million consumers
4th largest G&T in the nation• $3.7 billion total assets• $2.8 billion total debt• $980.4 million revenue
880 employees (MN and ND) 3,619 MW generation
• 701 MW renewables 4,660 miles transmission
GRE is a G&T cooperative
• Generation and transmission cooperatives (G&Ts) generate and transmit electricity to distribution co‑ops
• Distribution cooperatives deliver electricity to the consumer
• G&Ts are owned by distribution cooperatives
• Distribution co-ops are owned by member electric consumers
U.S. electric co-ops
• 846 distribution & 66 G&T cooperatives• Serve an estimated 42 million people
in 47 states, including: o 18 million businesses, homes, schools,
churches, farms, irrigation systems & other establishments in 2,500 of 3,141 counties in the U.S.
• Nearly 13% of the nation's METERS are customers of rural electric co-ops
Great River Energy’sMembers Rely on Coal Plants
• Coal Creek Station 1140 MW• Stanton Station 188 MW• Spiritwood Station 99 MW
• 67% of GRE’s energy comes from coal
• GRE’s North Dakota coal-fired plants are the economic foundation for our members’ affordable rates
Great River Energy’s Minnesota Generation
• 1300 MW of gas-fired peaking plants provide reliability
• 31 MW waste to energy plant provides renewable energy
• 300 MW of Minnesota wind purchases are carbon free
• 650 KW of new solar provides valuable R&D benefits
Great River Energy Prepared for Carbon Regulation
• Accelerate depreciation of Coal Creek and Stanton Stations
• Reduced CO2 emissions 20% below 2005 levels
• Substantially reduce reliance on coal• Meet growth with conservation, energy efficiency
renewables, natural gas, and the market• Use municipal waste for power generation; don’t
landfill it• Work with our members to develop solar and other
nontraditional generation
Impact of the Proposed Rule on Great River Energy
• North Dakota carbon intensity reduction requirement is 11%o DryFining™ coal refining system reduces CO2 emissions by
4%o Spiritwood combined heat and power plant is half as
carbon intense as conventional coal
• Minnesota carbon intensity requirement is 41%o GRE’s Minnesota generation is low or no carbono GRE is meeting Minnesota’s renewable energy standard
and conservation goals
Reliability and Affordability Remain Care Concerns
• The nation and region rely on the market for reliable energy and low cost resources
• What affects the market affects Great River Energy and our members; no utility is an island
• Carefully analyze the rule’s impact on reliability and cost
Great River Energy Advocacy Regarding the Proposed Rule
• Multiple efforts to shape outcome• Midwest Power Sector Collaborative• Coalition for Innovative Climate Solutions• National Rural Electric Cooperative Association• Work with federal and state policymakers
Thank you.