1
What Geomagnetism can Tell Us about the Solar Cycle?
Leif SvalgaardHEPL, Stanford University
Bern, 11 Nov., 2013ISSI Workshop: The Solar Activity Cycle: Physical
Causes and Consequences
”Wer hätte noch vor wenigen Jahren an die Möglichkeit gedacht, aus den Sonnenfleckenbeobachtungen ein terrestrisches Phänomen zu berechnen?”
(J. R. Wolf, Bern, 1852)
2
‘Different Strokes for Different Folks’
• The key to using geomagnetism to say something about the sun is the realization that geomagnetic ‘indices’ can be constructed that respond differently to different solar and solar wind parameters, so we can disentangle the various causes and effects
• In the last decade of research this insight has been put to extensive use and a consensus is emerging
3
Electric Current Systems in Geospace
Magnetospheric Currents
Polar CapnV2
B
BV2BV
±By
FUV
Diurnal Var.
Different Current Systems Different Magnetic Effects
4
Electric Current Systems in Geospace
We can now invert the Solar Wind – Magnetosphere relationships…
Polar Cap
nV2
B
BV2BV
±By
FUV
Diurnal Var.
Different Current Systems Different Magnetic Effects
5
Variometer Invented by Gauss, 1833
Nevanlinna et al.
Helsinki 1844-1912
6
Magnetic Recorders
46 years ago, I used the Classic Instruments Modern Instrument
Classic Method since 1847
7
Wolf’s Discovery (1852): rD = a + b RW
.
H
North X
D
Y = H sin(D)
dY = H cos(D) dD For small dD
rY
Morning
Evening
East Y
rD
A current system in the ionosphere is created and maintained by solar FUV radiation
The magnetic effect of this system was discovered by George Graham in 1722
8
The Diurnal Variation of the Declination for Low, Medium, and High Solar Activity
910
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8Diurnal Variation of Declination at Praha
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
dD' 1840-1849rD
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8Diurnal Variation of Declination at Praha (Pruhonice)
dD' 1957-1959
1964-1965
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year
9
The Amplitude of the Diurnal Variation [from many stations] follows the Sunspot Cycle (can in fact be used to check the Sunspot Number calibration)
10
Using rY from nine ‘chains’ of stations we find that the correlation between F10.7 and rY is extremely good (more than 98% of variation is accounted for)
0
50
100
150
200
250
1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
F10.7 sfu
25+Residuals
F10.7 calc = 5.42 rY - 130
Solar Activity From Diurnal Variation of Geomagnetic East Component
Nine Station Chains
232221201918171615141312
y = 5.4187x - 129.93
R2 = 0.9815
y = 0.043085x2.060402
R2 = 0.975948
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
rY
F10.7
rY is a Very Good Proxy for F10.7 Flux
11
y = 1.1254x + 4.5545
R2 = 0.9669
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Helsinki, Nurmijärvi
rY '9-station Chain'
1884-1908 1953-2008
Scaling to 9-station chain Helsinki-Nurmijärvi Diurnal Variation
Helsinki and its replacement station Numijärvi scales the same way towards our composite of nine long-running observatories and can therefore be used to check the calibration of
303540455055606570
1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Helsinki Nurmijärvi
9-station Chain
rY nT
Range of Diurnal Variation of East Component
the sunspot number (or more correctly to reconstruct the F10.7 radio flux)
12
Sabine’s Discovery about Geomagnetic Disturbances
Edward Sabine [1843] computed the hourly mean values for each month and defined Disturbance as the RMS of the differences between the actual and mean values.
And discovered [1852] that minima in the average rate and size of magnetic disturbances at the widely separated Hobarton (SH) and Toronto (NH) observatories in 1843 corresponded to a minimum in sunspot numbers, while maxima in 1848 corresponded to a maximum in the decennial sunspot curve. Sir Edward Sabine (1788-1883)
We use the IDV-index = unsigned difference from one day to the next
13
Relation to HMF Strength B
14
Latest 27-day Bartels
Rotation showing B
and Kp peaks
B
V
Kp
Correlation between IMF BVn and several geomag. indices as a function of n
n = 2
n = 0
n
Lockwood (LRSP2013)
Co
rrelation
2 3 410-1-2
The IDV indices are not significantly different from having a dependence on B only. Thus, the negative part of Dst (i.e. ring current enhancement) is closest to explaining the behavior of IDV
1.0
0.5
1965-2012
15
Latest Reconstruction of HMF B
16
The IHV Index gives us BV2
Calculating the variation (sum of unsigned differences from one hour to the next) of the field during the night hours [red boxes] from simple hourly means (the Interhourly Variation) gives us a quantity that correlates with BV2 in the solar wind
17
The Many Stations Used for IHVin 14 ‘Boxes’ well Distributed in Longitude,
Plus Equatorial Belt
18
IHV is a Measure of Power Input to the Ionosphere (Measured by POES)
19
We can calculate Am [and Aa] from IHV
From IDV we get B. From IHV we get BV2. Thus we can get V
20
Polar Cap Geomagnetic Observatories
Godhavn
Thule
1932-Present
1926-Present
21
Svalgaard-Mansurov Effect
NP
SP
Toward
Away
Not a subtle effect…
22
Sector Structure over Time
Vokhmyanin & Ponyavin, 2013
Now
23
Dominant Polarity: Rosenberg-Coleman Effect
Proves Polar Field Reversals in the Past
24
How do we Know that the Poles Reversed Regularly before 1957?
Svalgaard, 1977
Wilcox & Scherrer, 1972
The predominant polarity = polar field polarity (Rosenberg-Coleman effect) annually modulated by the B-angle.
This effect combined with the Russell-McPherron effect [geomagnetic activity enhanced by the Southward Component of the HMF] predicts a 22-year cycle in geomagnetic activity synchronized with polar field reversals, as observed (now for 1840s-Present).
“Thus, during last eight solar cycles magnetic field reversals have taken place each 11 year period”. S-M effect.Vokhmyanin & Ponyavin, 2012
25
Cosmic Ray Modulation Depends on the Sign of Solar Pole Polarity
Miyahara, 2011
The shape of the modulation curve [alternating ‘peaks’ and ‘flat tops’] shows the polar field signs.
North pole
North pole
Ice cores contain a long record of 10Be atoms produced by cosmic rays. The record can be inverted to yield the cosmic ray intensity. The technique is not yet good enough to show peaks and flats, but might with time be refined to allow this.Svalgaard
& Wilcox, 1976
26
Cross Polar Cap Hall Current
Ionospheric Hall Current across Polar Cap
1882
CHAMP
Been known a long time:
27
Cross Polar Cap Potential Drop
GDH THL Space
E ~ -V×B
28
Overdetermined System: 3 Eqs,
2 Unknowns
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
ϕ
NeutronIon
Cosmic Ray Modulation Parameter
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
B
Heliospheric Magnetic Field at Earth
HMF from IDV-index HMF observed in Space
B = p (IDV)
BV2 = q (IHV)
VB = r (PCap)
Here is B back to the 1830s:
Gjøa
29
R2 = 0.0019
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Ceiling
Floor
Br nT
Year
Radial Component of Heliospheric Magnetic Field at Earth
Since we can also estimate solar wind speed from geomagnetic indices [Svalgaard & Cliver, JGR 2007] we can calculate the radial magnetic flux from the total B using the Parker Spiral formula:
There seems to be both a Floor and a Ceiling and most importantly no long-term trend since the 1830s. Thus no Modern Grand Maximum.
Radial Magnetic Field (‘Open Flux’)
30
Solar Activity 1835-2011
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Monthly Average Ap Index
0
2
4
6
8
10
1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
B nT
Year
B (IDV)
B (obs)
Heliospheric Magnetic Field Strength B (at Earth) Inferred from IDV and Observed
13 23
Sunspot Number
Ap Geomagnetic Index (mainly solar wind speed)
Heliospheric Magnetic Field at Earth
Activity now is similar to what it was a century ago
31
Space Climate
32
The Heliospheric Current Sheet
Svalgaard & Wilcox, Nature, 1976
Artist: Werner Heil
Cosmic Ray Modulation caused in part by latitudinal variations of HCS, CIRs, CMEs, and B
33
The Cosmic Ray Connection
B Geomagn.B Cosmic Rays
34
Back to the Future
Showing very similar conditions of the HMF B at the recent minimum and the minimum 108 years before as deduced from the Geomagnetic Record.
2008-2009 HMF B = 4.14 1901-1902 HMF B = 4.10 nTSunspot Number, Ri = 3 Sunspot Number, Rz = 4
The first known report of the red flash, produced by spicules requiring the presence of widespread solar magnetic fields, comes from Stannyan observing the eclipse of 1706 at Bern, Switzerland. The second observation, at the 1715 eclipse in England, was made by, among others, Edmund Halley. These first observations of the red flash imply that a significant level of solar magnetism must have existed even when very few spots were observed, during the latter part of the Maunder Minimum (Foukal & Eddy, 2007)
Uganda, Nov. 3rd, 2013
35
Conclusions• We can determine B, V, and n back to 1830s• Polar field reversals occurred that far back• No Modern Grand Maximum• FUV radiation varies with Sunspot Number• Solar Cycle Variations can be tracked with
Geomagnetism• Caveat: The Earth’s main field is decreasing
and we don’t know how that affects the geomagnetic inferences