© 2013 Kilpatrick TownsendApril 25, 2013
Armed & Dangerous:Protecting your employees from violence
Yendelela Neely Anderson, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
Celeste Bradley, Blue Cross/Blue Shield Tennessee
Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr., Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis
Sheldon W. Snipe, AT&T Services, Inc.
Maria A. Audero, Paul Hastings LLP
THE FACTSArmed & Dangerous
2
Armed & Dangerous
• 2 million people are victims of workplace violence each year
• In 2011, homicideaccounted for 17% of all workplacefatalities
• Homicide is the mostcommon cause of workplace fatality in women
• Relatives account for most workplace violence against women
• Robbers account for most workplace violence against men3
LEGAL LANDSCAPEArmed & Dangerous
4
Armed & Dangerous
The majority of states have no legislature regarding rights with regards to guns in/around the workplace
5
Armed & Dangerous
16 states (and counting) have enacted laws expressly prohibiting employers from preventing employees from keeping their guns in their locked car in the parking lot
6
Armed & Dangerous
6 states have enacted laws requiring employers to post signs regarding any gun restrictions
7
Armed & Dangerous
It is unlawful in 5 states to ask employees or job applicants whether they possess a gun and/or to search employees cars for guns
8
Armed & Dangerous
14 states (and counting) limit the liability for employers who cannot prohibit employees from keeping guns in their locked cars in the parking lot
9
Armed & Dangerous
• Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”)– No specific OSHA standard for violence – General Duty Clause (OSH Act Section 5(a)(1))
• All employers have a general duty to provide their employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm
– OSHA has issued voluntary guidelines and recommendations for employers seeking to reduce the risk of workplace violence in at-risk industries• For-hire drivers, late-night retail establishments,
healthcare and social workers • Failure to adhere to the guidelines is not an automatic
violation of the General Duty Clause 10
Armed & Dangerous
• Ramsey Winch v. Henry, 555 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2009)– Challenge to Oklahoma bring your gun to work law– Reversed trial court ruling that gun-related workplace
violence was a “recognized hazard” under the general duty clause, and, therefore, an employer that allows firearms in the company parking lot may violate the OSH Act.
– Noted “an employee's general fear that he or she may be subject to violent attacks is not enough to require
abatement of a hazard under
the general duty clause”
11
TENSIONS RISING Armed & Dangerous
12
Armed & Dangerous
• Federal Limits:– “Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest
and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” issued April 25, 2012
– August 2012: EEOC announced focus on discrimination cases stemming from background checks
13
Armed & Dangerous
• State Limits:– “Ban-the-box” legislation: prohibits employers from asking
about criminal convictions on an initial employment application• Several states and cities have such laws
– Some states have deemed it unlawful under some circumstances to refuse to hire an applicant or take adverse action because of a criminal conviction
– Some states permit inquiry into criminal background but limit the scope, for example:• Prohibit questions about arrests that did not result in convictions• Limited ability to ask about “old” convictions• Limited ability to ask about misdemeanors or certain first
offenses 14
Armed & Dangerous
• The federal and state limits on employee background searches can be fertile ground for negligent hiring claims – Negligent hiring claims arise when a person suffers
harm at the hands of an employee and blames the employer’s failure to conduct a reasonable investigation of the applicant’s background
– Typical elements of claim:• Employment relationship (consider independent
contractors; subcontractors relationships)• Employee is dangerous, unfit or incompetent• Employer should have known or did in fact know• Employee’s dangerous propensities were cause of injury
15
Armed & Dangerous
14 states (and counting) limit the liability for employers who cannot prohibit employees from keeping guns in their locked cars in the parking lot
16
Armed & Dangerous
5 states limit the liability for employers regarding decisions on whether to seek temporary restraining orders on behalf of employees
17
Armed & Dangerous
• Courts generally ask the following questions regarding negligent hiring: – Did the employer know or should have known of an
employee’s potential risk? – Could the risk have been discovered by a reasonable
investigation?• What’s at stake:
– Raegan et al v. Dunaway Timber Company (2011): Negligent hiring case where Arkansas jury awarded $7 million in damages to a the family of an Arkansas truck driver killed in an accident.
– Linhart v. Heyl Logistics, LLC, et al. (2012): Oregon jury awards $5.3 million in damages on a negligent hiring case against Washington Transportation for failing to conduct background check and verifying driving record.
18
Armed & Dangerous
Courts ask the following questions regarding negligent hiring:• Did the employer know or should have known of an
employee’s potential risk? • Could the risk have been discovered by a reasonable
investigation?
2011 – Arkansas jury awarded $7 million in damages to a the family of an Arkansas truck driver killed in an accident. Claim of negligent hiring was brought against a timber company and its driver. Raegan et al v. Dunaway Timber Company et al 3:10-CV-03016
2012- Oregon jury awards $5.3 million in damages on a negligent hiring case against Washington Transportation for failing to conduct background check and verifying driving record. Linhart v. Heyl Logistics, LLC, et al., Case NO. 10-03100- PA
19
CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATING VIOLENCE
Armed & Dangerous
20
Armed & Dangerous
• Effective Workplace Violence Crisis Management Protocol– Step 1: Assessment
• Develop Management Team• In-House Resource• Political Dynamics
– Step 2: Coordinated Buy-In• Approach• Options
21
Armed & Dangerous
• Effective Workplace Violence Crisis Management Protocol (continued)– Step 3: Educate and Train
• Supervisor Training (early warning signs; de-escalate tension; prompt reporting)
• Wide Policy Coverage (Zero Tolerance; Open Communication; No Retaliation)
• Review And Enhance Security Measures• Cooperative Relationship With Law Enforcement
22
Armed & Dangerous
– Step 4: Investigation• Timeframe• Reporting to
Management
– Step 5: Decision Points• Access• Articulate• Understand
23
• Effective Workplace Violence Crisis Management Protocol (continued)
Armed & Dangerous
• Plan Implementation– Communication
• Decision-maker• Stakeholder • Public
– Progress• Step by Step• Effectiveness
– Reassessment • Trends• Effectiveness• Feedback
24
ATLANTA
AUGUSTA
CHARLOTTE
DENVER
DUBAI
LOS ANGELES
NEW YORK
RALEIGH
SAN DIEGO
SAN FRANCISCO
SEATTLE
SHANGHAI
SILICON VALLEY
STOCKHOLM
TAIPEI
TOKYO
WALNUT CREEK
WASHINGTON D.C.
WINSTON-SALEM
www.kilpatricktownsend.com
Questions?