1

Search for new gauge boson Z'B-L at LHC using Monte Carlo simulation

H.M.M.Mansour1,2, Nady Bakhet1,3

1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University 2 mansourhesham@yahoo.com

3 nady.bakhet@cern.ch, nady.bakhet@ yahoo.com

Abstract

We search for Z'B-L heavy neutral massive boson in dielectron

events produced in proton-proton collisions at LHC using Monte

Carlo simulation programs. To detect Z'B-L at LHC we used the

data which is produced from pp collision of Pythia8 produced

events at different energies for LHC then we use the angular

distribution, invariant mass, combined transverse momentum and

combined rapidity distributions for the dielectron produced from

Z'B-L decay channel to detect Z'B-L signal. B-L extension of SM

model predicts by existing Z'B-L heavy neutral massive boson at

high energies and from our results which we had simulated for

Z'B-L in B-L extension of standard model we predict that Z'B-L

boson will be found at LHC and has a mass in the range from

1000GeV to 1500GeV.

2

I. INTRODUCTION The fact that neutrinos are massive indicates that the

Standard Model (SM) requires extension. B-L model is a proposal

model as an extension for SM based on the gauge group

GB-L=SU(3)C × SU(2)L × U(1)Y × U(1)B-L where the invariance of

the Lagrangian under this gauge symmetry implies the existence

of a new gauge boson (beyond the SM ones) and the spontaneous

symmetry breaking in this model provides a natural explanation

for the presence of three right-handed neutrinos in addition to an

extra gauge boson and a new scalar Higgs. Therefore, it can lead

to very interesting phenomenological different from the SM

results which can be tested at the LHC .

An extra neutral massive gauge boson corresponding to B−L

gauge symmetry is predicted. There are many models which

contain extra gauge bosons. These models can be classifies into

two categories depending on whether or not they arise in a GUT

scenario . In some of these models, the Z′ and the SM Z are not

true mass due to mixing. This mixing induces the couplings

between the extra Z′ boson and the SM fermions.

In our model of B−L extension of the SM, the extra Z′B-L

boson and the SM fermions are coupled through the non-

vanishing B−L quantum numbers, searching for Z′B-L is accessible

via a clean dilepton signal at LHC. We will simulate B − L

extension of the SM, which is based on the gauge group SU(3)C ×

3

SU(2)L × U(1)Y × U(1)B-L using MC programs at LHC and

search for Z'B-L bosons in dielectron events produced in pp

collisions [15] at different energies of LHC using the Monte Carlo

event generator PYTHIA8 [1- 4] and the software tools (Data

analysis ROOT package and ROOFIT package to fit any result

histogram to get P.D.F. (Probability density function) also we use

MadGraph5/Madevent and CALCHEP programs

To identify the Z'B-L � e+ e− signal, both the dielectron angular

distribution [5] and the dielectron invariant mass distribution

[6]are used. The leptonic decays Z'B-L � ℓ+ℓ− provide the most

distinctive signature for observing the Z'B-L signal at a Large

Hadron Collider. We will study production of Z'B-L at LHC and

different branching ratios, and will study Z'B-L using dielectron

angular distribution and the results by using simulation event

generator PYTHIA8 and other software tools, ROOT and

ROOFIT also we will study Z 'B-L using dielectron invariant mass

and its results by using the software packages tools as Pythia8,

CalcHep, MadGraph/Madevent, FeynRules, ROOT data analysis

Physics Analysis Workstation (PAW) Mathematica , and RoFit

(Fitting curves)

4

II. RESULTS

In this section we present our results of simulation for Z'B-L of the

B − L model using MC simulation. We first present production

cross-sections of Z'B-L at the LHC as a function of Z'B-L mass for

various g'' values (where g'' is the U(1)B-L gauge coupling

constant) and for various energies for LHC, branching ratios as a

function of Z'B-L mass for heavy neutrino masse hυ = 200GeV

which will affect on different results of Z'B-L due to it is a heavy

particle and we get a different results rather than in where the

analysis in this paper did not take account of new heavy neutrino

which is the important signatures of B-L model [7-9] and did not

give any branching ration for heavy neutrino. After that we give

the result of Z'B-L total width as a function of ZB-L mass for

various values of g′'. Both angular distribution of dielectron and

invariant mass of dielectron we will present and finally will focus

on some phenomenological signatures of Z'B-L at LHC.

A. Production cross section In figures 1 and 2 we present the production cross sections for

Z'B-L for the most relevant production mechanisms. we can

compare the production cross sections for different hadronic

machines and CM energies. Figure 1 gives the cross sections in

the B − L model for Z'B-L at the LHC as a function of Z'B-L mass

5

for various g'' values (where g'' is the U (1)B-L gauge coupling

constant) and energy of LHC = 14 TeV while in the figure 2 gives

cross sections in the B − L model for Z'B-L at the LHC for

energies √s = 5, 7, 10, 12 and 14 TeV at fixed value of g''=0.2 .

At the patron level, the Z'B-L production cross section for process

depends on two main parameters the mass of Z'B-L and the

coupling constant g''. Therefore, the model B-L is controlled by

two parameters:

the mass of the Z'B-L and the coupling constant g" determining

Z'B-L couplings.Two experimental constraints exist on these two

parameters. The first comes from direct search for heavy neutral

gauge bosons at the Fermi Lab. which excludes a Z'B-L mass less

than 600 GeV. The second limit comes from LEP

'

6''

B LZm

T e vg

− > (1)

The interactions of the Z'B-L boson with the SM fermions in this model

is described by

'int '' 'z f

B Lf

L Y g Z f fµµ γ−=∑

(2)

Where YB-L is the B − L charge associated with the fermions f .

the extra neutral gauge boson Z'B-L acquires a mass due to the

B −L gauge symmetry breaking

6

m2Z' = 4g''v'2 (3)

where g'' is the U(1)B-L gauge coupling constant and v' is the

symmetry breaking scale

TABLE I. B-L quantum number for different particles

FIG. 1. Cross-sections in the B − L model for Z'B-L as a function of Z'B-L mass for various g'' values (where g'' is the U (1)B-L gauge coupling constant) at fixed energy of LHC = 14 TeV

Particle YB-L

l -1 eR -1 νR -1 q 1/3

7

The production cross sections for the Z'B-L signal in figures 1 and

2 were computed using MadGraph5 and PYTHIA8 where we

generated the process pp-> Zp of B-L model using MadGraph5

and export this process to PHYTHIA8 then the main switches

still on for Initial state Radiation(ISR) , Final State

Radiation(FSR), FSRinResonances, Decay

FIG. 2. Cross-sections in the B − L model for Z'B-L as a function of Z'B-L mass for various energies of LHC at √s = 5, 7, 10, 12 and 14 TeV at fixed value of g''=0.2

8

hadronization , allow resonance decays and master switch for multiparton interactions stay On . PartonLevel:ISR= On PartonLevel:FSR= On PartonLevel:FSRinProcess= On PartonLevel:FSRinResonances= On ProcessLevel:all = On ProcessLevel:resonanceDecays= On PartonLevel:all= On PartonLevel:Remnants= On PartonLevel:MPI= On HadronLevel:all= On HadronLevel:Hadronize= On HadronLevel:Decay= On HadronLevel:BoseEinstein= On

9

B. Branching ratios

FIG. 3. Branching ratios for Z'B-L boson as a function of Z'

B-L

mass for heavy neutrino mass hυ = 200Gev From the fig. 3, the branching ratios of Z'

B-L for different quarks

are equal approximately and branching ratios for different leptons

are high rather than quarks also the branching ratios for heavy

neutrino which have 200 GeV. In particular, BR(Z'B-L → ℓ+ℓ−)

10

varies between 17% and 17.5% where (ℓ = electron , muon , tau).

but for heavy neutrino BR(Z'B-L → hν hν)

for light neutrino BR(Z'B-L → ν ν ) varies between 8.5% and 9%,

and BR(Z'B-L → qq) varies between 5.5% and 6%.

Z'B-L can decay into one light and one heavy neutrino are highly

suppressed by the corresponding (heavy-light) neutrino mixing

and thus they can safely be neglected there a different rather than .

Heavy neutrino is the most characteristic for B-L model so it

affects on different other breaching ratios because it has a massive

rather than SM neutrino.

From figure 3 we can search for Z'B-L at LHC via a clean dilepton

signal which can be one of the first new physics signatures to be

observed at the LHC. We will study Z'B-L in this paper by using

the channel decay of Z'B-L to electrons pair using PYTHIA8 and

turn off all other channels decay for Z'B-L where the ratio of

dielctron channel is the highest one and then use these commands.

pythia.readString("900032:onMode=0")

pythia.readString("900032:m0=1000")

pythia.readString("900032:onIfAll=11 -11")

Where the first command turn off all decay channels of Z'B-L and

the second one set the mass of Z'B-L to 1000GeV and the third

command permits to decay of Z'B-L to electron and positron only.

11

C. Total width of Z'

B-L The Z'

B-L boson decays only to fermions at tree-level and its width

is given by the following expression

2 22'

2 2' '

4( ' ) ( ) 1 2 1

12fZ f F

fZ Z

M m mZ f f C

M Mν

π

Γ → = + −

(4)

Where mf is the mass and Cf the number of colours of the

fermion type f .In Figs. 4 and 5 we present the total decay width

of the Z'B-L as a function of Z'

B-L and g'', respectively with the

other parameters held fixed to three different values

FIG. 4. Total width for Z'

B-L boson as a function of mass Z'B-L for fixed values of g'' From the two plots we see that the total width of a Z'

B-L gauge

boson varies from a few to hundreds of GeV over a mass range of

1TeV < Z'B-L < 5 TeV, depending on the value of g''

12

The decay widths of Z'B-L → ffbar in this model are then given by:

2'

'

( '' )( )

24

lB L

Z

g YZ l l m

π+ − −Γ → ≈

(5)

2

''

( '' )( ) (1 ), , ,

8

qSB L

Z

g YZ qq m q b c s

απ π

−Γ → ≈ + ≡ (6)

2 2 22

' 1/2' 2 2 2

' ' '

4( '' )( ) (1 )(1 ) (1 ( ))

8

tt t s s tB L

ZZ Z Z

m m mg YZ tt m

m m m

α απ π

−Γ → ≈ − − + + Ο (7)

FIG. 5. Total width for Z'

B-L boson as a function of g'' for different values of Z'B-L mass

Fig. 1 and 2 are calculated by PYTHIA8 using the commands

13

pythia.event[i].mWidth()

PartonLevel:ISR= On PartonLevel:FSR= On

The main switches for Initial State Radiation, Final Sate

Radiation and multiple interaction are on. In the first figure we

used fixed energy of LHC 14 TeV at various values of g'' while in

second figure we use fixed g''=0.2 at different LHC energies. we

note that the total width of Z'B-L with the energy of LHC and with

g'' with increasing the mass of Z'B-L

D. Dielectron angular distribution By using dielectron Angular Distribution cosθ * where θ * is the

angle in the dielectron rest reference frame between the negative

electron and the incident incoming quark . PYTHIA8 gives θ

only in Lab frame but we use θ * here which is in rest frame so we

must convert from lab frame to rest frame to get θ * by using boost

vector

we define two additional reference frames:

(a) the colliding proton CM frame denoted by Ο (this frame is

identical to the laboratory frame) and (b) The rest frame of the

dilepton system denoted by Ο* The dilepton system is boosted

along the beam axis. The z-axis is chosen as the direction of one

of the beams, and it is then identical for Ο and Ο * frames.

14

It should be noted that there is a sign ambiguity in the

measurement of cosθ *, since for a particular event, there is no

information about whether the incoming quark comes from the

positive or negative z directions. Instead, it is useful to consider

the quantity cosθ *, where *βθ is the angle between the dilepton

system boost β�

(relative to the O frame) and the lepton

direction[10]

**

*cos l

l

p

p

βθβ

⋅=⋅

�����

����� (8)

Where the boost vector is

l l

l l

p p

E Eβ

+=

+

��� ���

��

(9)

In order to obtain *lp the boost vector of the dilepton system

should be found and the transformation to the O* frame should be

performed

15

FIG. 6. Angular Distribution of Dielectron of Z'B-L boson decay where forward electrons cos(θ *) >0 and backword electrons cos(θ *) <0 E. Dielectron asymmetry AFB

In the process 'B Lqq Z ll−→ → the Z'B-L boson has

both vector and axial vector couplings to the fermions. These

couplings create an asymmetry in the momentum of the electron,

visible in the polar angle of the lepton pairs center of mass frame.

This polar angle measured in the center of mass frame of the

leptons is typically referred to as the Collins Soper frame .

The angular cross section measured in this frame is given by:

16

2 * **

( ' )(1 cos ( )) cos( )

cos( )B Ld qq Z ll

A Bd

σ θ θθ

−→ →= − + (10)

Here, *θ is the emission angle of the electron relative to the

quark momentum in the lepton's center of mass frame. The

constants A and B are determined by the weak isospin and charge

of the incident quarks as well as the mass of the dilepton pair.

From this cross section, it is convenient to define Nf as the

number of events whose *θ is positive, and Nb as the number of

events whose *θ is negative. The asymmetry can then be written:

* *

* *

cos( ) 0 cos( ) 0

cos( ) 0 cos( ) 0

FB

d d

d dA

d d

d d

σ σθ θσ σθ θ

− > < =

+ > <

(11)

3

8

B

A= ×

f b

f b

N N

N N

−=

+ (13)

17

This is the general form of the asymmetry . Collins and Soper noted that an ambiguity exists in the

determination of the emission angle θ * when considering

qq ll→

This Drell-Yan process is quite simple [11] when the incoming

quarks have no transverse momentum. In such a case, the

emission angle is determined by the angle the electron makes with

the proton beam, and thus the incoming quark momentum vector.

However, since circular acceleration implies a certain amount of

transverse momentum by construction, an ambiguity arises. Since

the quarks' individual momenta can not be measured, the

momenta boosted into the center of mass frame of the leptons are

even more difficult to separate. Consequently, the dependence of

the transverse momentum must be minimized.

The polar *θ axis is the bisector of the proton beam momentum

and the negative (-) of the antiproton beam momentum when the

two are boosted into the center of mass frame of the leptons. In so

doing, the dependence on the transverse momentum of the

incoming quark pair is minimized.

18

FIG. 7. The lepton's center of mass frame and the Collins-Soper

frame.

19

TABLE II. This table gives the numbers of forward and backward electrons produced from Z'B-L decay in the range of mass 500GeV to 1500GeV for Z'B-L and also asymmetry calculation.

Z'B-L mass (GeV)

Forward electrons NF

cos(θ *) >0 Backward electrons NB

cos(θ *) <0 Asymmetry

AFB

1500 1531 1469 0.020 1400 1520 1480 0.013 1300 1470 1530 -0.02 1200 1470 1530 -0.02 1100 1470 1530 -0.02 1000 1482 1518 -0.012 900 1531 1469 0.020 800 1498 1510 -0.004 700 1524 1476 0.016 600 1529 1471 0.019 500 1500 1500 0

FIG. 8. Dielectron asymmetry Distribution for forward and backward electrons for various values of Z'B-L masses

20

F. Drell Yan background events The histogram shows the generated dielctron events for a

reconstructed mass of 50 to 700 GeV for SM Z0. There is a peak

centered around the 100 GeV and we generated 20000 events.

This peak, or resonant signal, corresponds to the production of a

Z0 with a mass of 91.188 GeV/c. The is called the Drell-Yan

spectrum because the dielectron were produced by what is called

the Drell-Yan process, qq Z e e° + −→ → Here q is a

quark from one of the protons and it annalists with its antiparticle

q from the one coming proton and produces a Z0 which then

decays into two dielectron .

The Z0 reconstructed mass according to the equation:

2 2 2 2 2

e e e e e eZM M M E E P P− + − + − += + + − (14)

21

FIG. 9. The Drell-Yan background electrons produced from Z °

boson for quark and antiquark annihilation .This act as the background of Z'B-L decay to dielectron. G. Dielectron invariant mass By using PYTHIA8, ROOT and ROOFIT. We created a series of

Z'B-L signals with masses from 500 GeV/c2 to 1500 GeV/c2 show

table 3 .The invariant mass is reconstructed from the energy and

momenta of the selected electrons using coupling constant equal

to 0.1

We generate 5000 events for every signal mass where the

backgrounds Drell Yan events and desired signal events are

selected by applying a number of selection cuts on all events

samples.

22

1- Transverse energy of selected electrons ET > 100 GeV.

2- The selected must be in the central or in the forward regions of

|η| < 1.442 or 1.566 < |η| < 2.5 then we choose the two highest-

energy electrons. Where η is pseudorapidity which describe the

angle of a particle relative to beam axis

ln[( / 2)]η θ= − (15)

θ is the angle between the particle momentum vector P and the beam axis FIG. 10. The Pseudorapidity of produced electrons of Z'B-L

decay

23

FIG. 11. The reconstruction for ZB-L mass from produced dilectron invariant masses at ZB-L mass 1 TeV.

From figure 11 we find a peak at 1 TeV which is the

reconstruction mass of ZB-L from the electron positron invariant

masses this allowed us to compare the signal generated events

with the Drell Yan background from last figure 8.

24

TABLE III. The expected number of events using PYTHIA8 event generator and coupling constant g''=0.1, also the number of signal event for Z'B-L and background events from Drell-Yan process the Significance calculation

Zprime mass(GeV)

Expected events Nexp

Mass window

Signal events

NS

Background events

NB

Significance S

1500 28.24 550 28.11 0.128 15.76 1400 38.36 520 38.25 0.102 19.4 1300 52.87 480 52.7 0.142 22.8 1200 73.31 460 73.1 0.206 26.7 1100 106.2 420 105.913 0.286 32.31 1000 157.2 450 156.7 0.424 39.3 900 237.9 500 237.2 0.639 48.38 800 375.5 480 374.4 1.013 60.7 700 641.8 500 640.07 1.72 79.4 600 1116 400 1113.01 2.98 104.8 500 2180 320 2174 5.8489 146.5

H. Luminosity

For each generated signal, PYTHIA8 calculated the cross section

for each process. This is important because it allows us to scale

our generated events to what an actual signal would look like

given luminosity. The luminosity is a measure of the number of

particles per unit area in an accelerator [12]. Therefore, the

number of expected events, Nexp can be determined by the

formula :

Nexp = Lσ and Nexp=NS + NB (16)

25

Where σ is the PYTHIA8 result cross section of event

generated and L is the integrated luminosity. And NS is the

number of signal events and NB is the number of background

events at this cross section

Table III shows a summary of signal events and background

events for different values of Z'B-L mass and corresponding

significance.

FIG. 12. Luminosity required for observation as a function of Z'B-L mass for selected values of g''=0.2 at the LHC for √s = 14 TeV

26

I. Significance calculations To calculate the significance, each reconstructed mass is fitted by

a Gaussian using the ROOFIT package and use the standard

deviation with 3σ mass window around the fitted peak for

example at 1000 GeV peak the mass windows 450GeV then

σ = 75 and µ =1000 , we will integrate the Gaussian from

550 to 1450 to get the fraction of signal event , then we will

multiply this fraction by the total expected events Nexp to get the

number of signal event S and calculate the background events by

NB = Nexp – NS (17)

The significance formula is:

2[( ) ln(1 ) ]SS B S

B

NS N N N

N= + + −

(18)

27

FIG. 13. Signal significance as a function of the mass for Z'B-L for g'' = 0.2 J. Transverse momentum of distribution Z'

B-L Transverse momentum Pt distributions of positron and electron

pairs in the Z'B-L boson mass region (500<Me+e-< 1500 GeV) are

reported. The results are obtained using PYTHIA8 of proton-

proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 14 TeV, at LHC.

The distributions are measured over the ranges |η| < 1.442 or

1.566 < |η| < 2.5 and Transverse energy of selected electrons ET

> 100 GeV. The production of Z'B-L bosons, which may be

identified through their leptonic within B-L extension of standard

28

model. The total and differential cross sections have been

calculated. The measurement of the rapidity y and transverse-

momentum Pt distributions of the Z'B-L boson provides new

information about the dynamics of proton collisions at high

energies. The Pt spectrum provides a better understanding of the

underlying collision process at low transverse momentum.

The distributions for y and PT are normalized by total cross

sections within acceptance regions described below.

FIG. 14. Transverse momentum for dielectron for mass of Z'B-L 1TeV and energy of LHC=14TeV and g'' = 0.2

The measurements of the rapidity and transverse momentum

spectra are based on samples of over boson events reconstructed

in each dilepton decay mode and collected using high Pt single-

29

lepton .For the Z'B-L boson candidates selected, the pairs of

leptons, are required to have a reconstructed invariant mass in the

range 500 <Me+e-< 1500 GeV.

The two electrons candidates with the highest Pt in the event are

used to reconstruct a Z'B-L candidate. Electrons are required to

have ET >100 GeV and |η| < 1.442 or 1.566 < |η| < 2.5

FIG. 15. Differential cross section as a function of dielctron transverse momentum at g''=0.2 and energy of LHC=14TeV

30

dielectron produced from Z'B-L decay.

FIG. 16. The normalized differential cross section for Z'B-L bosons as a function of transverse-momentum of dielectron

K. Rapidity of Z 'B-L

The rapidity is defined as

( )1ln

2 ( )t t

t

E Py

E P

+=

− (19)

31

Where E is the energy of the Z'

B-L candidate and PT is its

longitudinal momentum along the anticlockwise beam axis

(the z axis of the detector).The Z'B-L y and Pt are determined from

the leptons momenta. The measured differential dielectron cross

sections are normalized to the inclusive Z cross section

The differential cross section is determined in each y or bin by

subtracting from the number of detected events in a bin the

estimated number of background events. The distributions are

corrected for signal acceptance and efficiency and for the effects

of detector resolution and electromagnetic final-state radiation

(FSR) using an unfolding technique based on the inversion of a

response matrix. The final result takes into account the bin width

and is normalized by the measured total cross section.

32

FIG. 17. Absolute value of rapidity for dielectron for mass of Z'B-L 1TeV and energy of LHC=14TeV and g'' = 0.2

The distribution of Z'B-L bosons is symmetric about y = 0,

and therefore the appropriate measurement is the distribution

as a function of the absolute value of rapidity The measurement is

normalized to the total cross section

1 d

d y

σσ

and σ is the total cross section is determined by 2702 events

33

FIG. 18. The normalized differential cross section for Z'B-L bosons as a function of the absolute value of rapidity of dielectron for mass of Z'B-L 1TeV and energy of LHC=14TeV and g'' = 0.2

III. CONCLUSIONS In this work we have presented the LHC potential to discover a heavy

neutral massive gauge boson Z'B-L of B-L extension of SM model using

MC programs where we have simulated the production cross section at

different center of mass energies of LHC for various values of coupling

constant g'' and branching ratios of Z'B-L to all different decay channels to

fermions also we presented the total width of Z'B-L as a function of Z'

B-L

mass . Also decaying of Z'B-L into an electron–positron pair and we

calculated dielectron invariant mass for fixed value of g'', Luminosity and

significance .Finally we calculated the normalized differential cross

section of dielectron as a function of the absolute value of rapidity and the

normalized differential cross section of dielectron as a function of

combined transverse momentum. All these signatures predict by existence

a new gauge boson Z'B-L at LHC.

34

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It is a pleasure to thank T. Sjostrand, for useful discussions of PYTHIA, L.

Basso and C. Duhr in assistance of B-L model and J. Alwall for

useful discussions of MadGraph5/MadEvent.

References [1] T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026. [2] T. Sjostrand , CERN-LCGAPP-2005-05 July 2005 [3] T. Sjostrand,http://home.thep.lu.se/~torbjorn/php8160/Welcome.php [4] L. Basso, (PhD Thesis, university of southampton) arXiv:1106.4462v1 [hep-ph] 22 Jun 2011 [5] L. Basso, (Master Thesis,Universit`a degli Studi di Padova,2007 ) [6] Lorenzo Basso, A. Belyaev, S. Moretti arXiv:0812.4313v1 [hep-ph] 22 Dec 2008 [7] CDF Collaboration- arXiv:hep-ex/0602045v1 24 Feb 2006 [8] L. Basso, arXiv:0903.4777 [hep-ph] 16 Sep 2009 [9] T.Sjostrand T, Eden P, Friberg C, Lonnblad L, Miu G, Mrenna S and Norrbin Comput. Phys. Commun. 135 238 [10] T. Sjostrand et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. 135, 238 (2001) [11] A. Ferrari , 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.093008 [12] Catalin Ciobanu , Thomas Junk ,Gregory Veramandi CDF/PHYS/EXOTIC/PUBLIC/7755 [13] Christopher Rogan Fall 2004 Junior Paper [14] D.Bandurin Kansas State University, CMS AN-2008/044 [15] D. Evans, C. Hill, J. Jackson, D. Newbold , CMS AN-2008/048 [16] Marcela Carena, Alejandro Daleo, Bogdan A. Dobrescu, arXiv:hep-ph/0408098v1 6 Aug 2004 [17] P Min´e , Emam 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 115008 [18] Gideon Bella, Erez Etzion, Noam Hod, Mark Sutton arXiv:1004.1649v1 [hep-ex] 9 Apr 2010