Zoning Three Rs - Part I - Research

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Zoning Three Rs - Part I - Research

    1/2

    Three Rs for Local Zoning Success: Part I - Research

    By Ralph Wyngarden, Zoning Director

    Whether your project involves wind, solar or communications, when it falls under local

    jurisdiction the fundamentals for success are the same. Best practices for zoning can be

    grouped into three categories: Research, Relationships and Record. In this first article of athree part series we examine the research and preparation process.

    The foundation for success is thorough research and preparation. This will enable you to

    steer your project to the most appropriate location and avoid fatal flaws. Know the Who?

    What? When? Where? Why? and How? of your project inside and out so you can confidently

    present it and explain why it is a good fit for its surroundings and a benefit to the

    community.

    During the initial planning stage, determine which local jurisdictions will have authority over

    your project area and acquire and study each jurisdictions comprehensive plan, zoning

    ordinance, zoning map, and any other relevant regulations or planning documents. Athorough knowledge of which districts permit the use, what the approval process is, and

    what current setbacks and design restrictions may apply will enable you to guide the project

    location and design to minimize opposition and maximize the chances of approval.

    Once you have a solid feel for how the regulatory process in each jurisdiction works you

    may see areas of strength or weakness in your proposed project or ordinance language that

    may have a negative impact depending on how it is interpreted. Call the planner to see if

    their interpretation matches your own. If so, have them document it. If there are

    weaknesses or differences in interpretation that cant be avoided orexisting regulations

    dontadequately address your proposed use, an appropriately crafted ordinance

    amendment may be in everyones interest.

    Pay close attention to the actual physical environment. An area where your project is not

    allowed on paper might actually be the most appropriate from a local perspective and a

    rezoning would be widely supported. Conversely, an area that appears to permit your

    project may be next to planned residential subdivisions or other uses that are locally seen

    as incompatible. When you do select a location, be intimately familiar with it. Drive around

    it and see what the neighbors are going to see. Take note of other nearby uses and

    structures and the condition of neighboring properties so you can speak knowledgeably

    about compatibility and any anticipated impacts. If there are factors that are best

    appreciated in the field, a pre-meeting field trip by the decisionmakers may be appropriate.

    If you are able to get a feel for the internal dynamics of the zoning process it will help guide

    where you focus your efforts and how you tailor your presentation. Does the planning staff

    have such an influential role that most decisions closely follow staff recommendation? Are

    the decisionmakers strongly independent and likely to chart their own course regardless of

    staff recommendation or public comment? Are they so sensitive to public comment that

    projects rarely get approved if there is any opposition present? Are the meetings generally

    lengthy and formal with detailed questioning and review of ordinance standards or more

  • 8/12/2019 Zoning Three Rs - Part I - Research

    2/2

    likely to be quick and informal with lots of discretion and few details (in which case

    establishing a good record of the decision may be more of a concern)? Have there been

    other similar applications in the past? What were the issues and outcomes?

    Know the community and your likely audience at the meeting. How does the community

    see itself and how does your project fit into that vision? What are the hot issues? What isthe local economy based on? Is there more concern about tourism and aesthetics or

    economic development and job creation? Are you more likely to be explaining aviation

    impacts to crop dusters, setback compliance to adjacent homeowners, or cultural impacts to

    tribal representatives? Will a site in the extreme corner of a parcel be frowned on because

    of the proximity to neighboring parcels or applauded because it preserves active farmland

    and doesnt interfere with center-pivot irrigation? The answers to these types of questions

    are likely to be different for each community. Forewarned is forearmed.

    Ralph Wyngarden([email protected])is Zoning Director at Faulk &

    Foster. He has served wind and solar developers and wireless telecommunicationsproviders in markets across the country for the past nine years and is responsible for the

    development and maintenance of best practices for zoning and permitting for Faulk &

    Fosters telecommunications and energy departments.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]