Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    1/28

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    ZOND, LLC,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR LIMITED,

    FUJITSU SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA,INC., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR

    MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

    LIMITED, TSMC NORTH AMERICACORP.,

    Defendants.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. _____________

    JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

    COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

    Plaintiff Zond, LLC (Zond) files this Complaint for Patent Infringement

    (Complaint) against Defendants Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited and Fujitsu Semiconductor

    America, Inc. (collectively, Fujitsu), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company,

    Limited and TSMC North America Corp. (collectively, TSMC), wherein, pursuant to 35

    U.S.C. 271 and 281, Zond seeks a judgment of infringement by Fujitsu and TSMC of U.S.

    Patent Nos. 6,806,651 (the 651 patent), 6,896,773 (the 773 patent), 6,896,775 (the 775

    patent), 6,903,511 (the 511 patent), 7,095,179 (the 179 patent), and 7,446,479 (the

    479 patent) (collectively, Patents-in-Suit), and damages resulting therefrom pursuant to

    35 U.S.C. 284, as well as injunction of the infringing activity pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283,

    and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper, and in support thereof alleges as

    follows:

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    2/28

    2

    The Parties

    1. Zond is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place of businessat 137A High Street Mansfield, MA 02048. Zond wholly owns Zpulser, LLC (Zpulser),

    also based in Mansfield, MA. Zpulser commercializes Zonds patented technology by

    manufacturing and selling unique high-power plasma generators.

    2. On information and belief, Defendant Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited (FSL)is a Japanese corporation with its principal place of business at Nomura Shin-Yokohama

    Bldg., 2-10-23 Shin-Yokohama, Kohoku-Ku Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan. On information

    and belief, FSL conducts business in the United States through its subsidiaries, including

    through Defendant Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc.

    3. On information and belief, Defendant Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc.(FSA), is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1250 E. Arques

    Ave, M/S 333, Sunnyvale, CA 94085-5401. On information and belief, FSA is a wholly

    owned subsidiary of FSL and is controlled by and/or acts as an agent of FSL.

    4. On information and belief, Defendant Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingCompany, Ltd. (TSMC Ltd.) is a company organized under the laws of Taiwan that

    maintains its principal place of business at No. 8, Li-Hsin Road 6, Hsinchu Science Park,

    Hsinchu, Taiwan 30077. On information and belief, TSMC Ltd. conducts business in the

    United States through its subsidiaries, including through Defendant TSMC North America,

    Corp.

    5. On information and belief, Defendant TSMC North America, Corp. (TSMC-NA) is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 2585 Junction Avenue,

    San Jose, CA 95134. On information and belief, TSMC-NA is wholly owned by TSMC Ltd.,

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    3/28

    3

    and serves as TSMC Ltd.s exclusive sales agent in North and South America.

    Jurisdiction and Venue

    6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because the action concerns infringement of a United States

    patent.

    7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of Defendants at least by virtueof each of Defendants having conducted business in this District and having committed one or

    more acts of infringement in this District.

    8.

    Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400.

    9. This action is related to Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-11634-WGY (the 11634Action), filed in this District in July 2013. In that related action, Fujitsu admitted that this

    Court has subject matter jurisdiction over that action. In the 11634 Action, Fujitsu did not

    contest personal jurisdiction or venue. In the 11634 Action, TSMC did not contest personal

    jurisdiction or venue. Given that this action is related to the 11634 Action, each of

    Defendants must be bound in this action to its position regarding jurisdiction and venue in the

    11634 Action.

    The Six (6) Patents-in-Suit

    10. Zond is the owner of the 651 Patent entitled High-Density Plasma Source,which the United States Patent & Trademark Office lawfully and duly issued on October 19,

    2004.

    11. Zond is the owner of the 773 Patent entitled High Deposition RateSputtering, which the United States Patent & Trademark Office lawfully and duly issued on

    May 24, 2005.

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    4/28

    4

    12. Zond is the owner of the 775 Patent entitled High-Power PulsedMagnetically Enhanced Plasma Processing, which the United States Patent & Trademark

    Office lawfully and duly issued on May 24, 2005.

    13. Zond is the owner of the 511 Patent entitled Generation of Uniformly-Distributed Plasma, which the United States Patent & Trademark Office lawfully and duly

    issued on June 7, 2005.

    14. Zond is the owner of the 179 Patent entitled Methods and Apparatus forGenerating Strongly-Ionized Plasmas with Ionizational Instabilities, which the United States

    Patent & Trademark Office lawfully and duly issued on August 22, 2006.

    15. Zond is the owner of the 479 Patent entitled High-Density Plasma Source,which the United States Patent & Trademark Office lawfully and duly issued on November 4,

    2008.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    1. Zonds Patented Technology

    16. Founded in 2002, Zond is a technology development company based outside ofBoston in Mansfield, Massachusetts. With its President and Co-Founder Dr. Roman

    Chistyakov at the helm, Zond has been developing a unique plasma discharge technology,

    which is protected by over 30 patents and patent applications pending throughout the world,

    including 18 patents that have issued in the United States. Dr. Chistyakov is the named

    inventor on all six (6) of Zonds Patents-in-Suit. These patents are generally directed to the

    generation, use and/or applications of a unique plasma discharge technology that has wide-

    ranging applicability in various industries, including semiconductor chip manufacturing, as

    described further below.

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    5/28

    5

    17. In 2005, Zpulser was created as the marketing and sales arm of Zond tocommercialize Zonds patented technology. Zpulser offers a revolutionary product line of

    plasma generators that are commercially practicable and allow for use of the technology in an

    industrial manufacturing environment.

    18. Zonds plasma technology has application in various industries ranging fromconsumer products such as razor blades to electronics such as semiconductor chips and flat

    panel displays, which provides numerous competitive advantages over alternative and older

    technology. For example, in the semiconductor chip industry, Zonds patented technology

    allows certain important types of plasmas to be generated in an industrial manufacturing

    environment. Such plasmas can be used for certain critical manufacturing steps for

    semiconductor chips made using the latest generation of 32 nm and smaller semiconductor

    process technology. These applications range from forming the critical copper-based

    interconnects to the unique transistor structures necessary in these new generations of chips.

    2. Fujitsus Infringing Products

    19. Fujitsu is a designer and developer of semiconductor products and solutions forconsumer, communications, automotive and industrial products including integrated circuits

    made from Complimentary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor devices (CMOS devices), analog

    to digital converters (ADC), application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) solutions

    graphics display controllers, embedded MCUs and controllers, video and image processors,

    analog devices, wireless ICs, memory solutions as well as numerous other electronic devices.

    20. Fujitsus devices are constructed using semiconductor circuit technology. Thistechnology, along with related advances in semiconductor processing, allows Fujitsu to

    manufacture devices and transistors at smaller and smaller distances between relevant

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    6/28

    6

    components resulting in higher density and more complex circuits.

    21. Fujitsus integrated circuit manufacturing continues to use techniques that usesmaller and smaller features for various product cycles. The size of the smallest parts of a

    transistor is generally referred to by Fujitsu as a node. Upon information and belief,

    Fujitsus smallest manufacturing nodes being currently marketed are 28 nanometers (nm).

    A move to devices using smaller manufacturing nodes is expected in the near future.

    22. In order to manufacture circuit devices at the 28 nm and smaller nodes(Accused Nodes), unique manufacturing processes had to be developed by or for Fujitsu

    that, on information and belief, employ Zonds patented technology for generating and using

    strongly or super-ionized plasmas in a manufacturing environment. On information and

    belief, Fujitsus infringing devices include those made using process steps that employ

    strongly or super-ionized plasmas including, but not limited to, processes for depositing

    interconnects and contacts, and metal for metal gate transistors, as well as other methods of

    generating and using strongly or super-ionized plasmas to form 28 nm class and smaller

    devices. Fujitsus infringing devices include Fujitsus 28 nm and smaller node devices

    including, but not limited to, integrated circuits made from CMOS devices, ASIC devices as

    well as other semiconductor devices at the Accused Nodes (collectively, the Fujitsu

    Infringing Products). The Fujitsu Infringing Products include, but are not limited to, the

    following types of offerings: its 8-bit, 28nm CMOS ADCs (based on Fujitsus CHAIS

    architecture)and 28 nm ASIC devices. Discovery is expected to uncover the full extent of

    Fujitsus unlawful use of Zonds patented plasma technology beyond these accused devices

    already identified through public information.

    23. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has had knowledge of Zonds patented

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    7/28

    7

    technology, including the Patents-in-Suit, prior to the initiation of this action. Specifically,

    Fujitsu has had knowledge of the Patents-in-Suit since at least July 2013 in connection with

    the prior litigation between the parties in the related 11634 Action and, at the very least, since

    May 21, 2014, when a list of Zonds issued U.S. patents was provided to Fujitsus counsel in

    connection with the related 11634 Action. Likewise, upon information and belief, Fujitsu has

    known or should have known that TSMC employs Zonds patented technology in the

    manufacture of all TSMC wafers that, when separated into individual infringing chips, are

    incorporated into any and all Fujitsu Infringing Products.

    3. TSMCs Infringing Products and Processes

    24. TSMC is a dedicated contract manufacturer of semiconductor products andsolutions for computer, communications, and consumer electronic products and offers wafer

    fabrication processes including, but not limited to: embedded non-volatile memory process;

    embedded dynamic random access memory process; mixed signal / radio frequency process;

    high voltage process; complementary metal-oxide semiconductor image sensor process; color

    filter process, micro electro-mechanical system process and silicon germanium process.

    25. TSMCs wafer fabrication continues to use techniques that use smaller andsmaller features for various product cycles. The size of the smallest parts of a transistor is

    generally referred to by TSMC as a node. Upon information and belief, TSMCs smallest

    manufacturing nodes currently marketed are 28 and newly developed 20 nm.

    26. In order to manufacture circuit devices at the 28 and 20 nm and smaller nodes,unique manufacturing processes had to be developed by or for TSMC that, on information and

    belief, employ Zonds patented technology for generating and using strongly or super-ionized

    plasmas in a manufacturing environment. On information and belief, TSMCs infringing

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    8/28

    8

    products include those made using process steps that employ strongly or super-ionized

    plasmas including, but not limited to, processes for depositing interconnects and contacts, and

    metal for metal gate transistors, as well as other methods of generating and using strongly or

    super-ionized plasmas to form 28 and 20 nm class and smaller devices (TSMC Infringing

    Products). The TSMC Infringing Products include, without limitation, all TSMC wafers

    produced by an infringing process that, when separated into individual infringing chips, are

    incorporated into any and all Fujitsu Infringing Products. Discovery is expected to uncover

    the full extent of TSMCs unlawful use of Zonds patented plasma technology beyond these

    accused devices already identified through public information.

    27. Upon information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of Zonds patentedtechnology, including the Patents-in-Suit, prior to the initiation of this action. Specifically,

    TSMC has had knowledge of the Patents-in-Suit since at least September 2013 in connection

    with the prior litigation between the parties in the related 11634 Action and, at the very least,

    since May 21, 2014, when a list of Zonds issued U.S. patents was provided to Fujitsus

    counsel in connection with the related 11634 Action. Additionally, Zond put TSMC on notice

    of infringement of the Patents-in-Suit on June 5, 2014. Even though TSMC was put on notice

    that Zond intended to file this action in this District as related to the 11634 Action, in an effort

    to forum-shop and avoid adjudication of Zonds claims in this District, TSMC rushed to file

    an improper declaratory judgment action in the District of Delaware on Sunday, June 8, 2014.

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Fujitsus Infringement of the 651 Patent)

    28. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 27 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    29. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directly

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    9/28

    9

    infringing one or more claims of the 651 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    30. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 651 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 651 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 651 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 20 of the 651 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 651 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 651 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

    has had knowledge of the 651 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    10/28

    10

    the 651 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    31. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 651 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    32. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 651 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    33. Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF(Fujitsus Infringement of the 773 Patent)

    34. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 33 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    35. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 773 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    36. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 773 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 773 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 773 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 21 of the 773 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    11/28

    11

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 773 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 773 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

    has had knowledge of the 773 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

    the 773 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    37. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 773 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    38. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 773 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    39. Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Fujitsus Infringement of the 775 Patent)

    40. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 39 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    12/28

    12

    41. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 775 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    42. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 775 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 775 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 775 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 15 of the 775 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 775 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 775 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    13/28

    13

    has had knowledge of the 775 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

    the 775 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    43. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 775 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    44. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 775 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    45. Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Fujitsus Infringement of the 511 Patent)

    46. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 45 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    47. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 511 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    48. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 511 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 511 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 511 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    14/28

    14

    process in accordance with Claim 28 of the 511 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 511 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 511 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

    has had knowledge of the 511 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

    the 511 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    49. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 511 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    50. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 511 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    51. Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Fujitsus Infringement of the 179 Patent)

    52. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 51 of the Complaint as if

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    15/28

    15

    set forth here in full.

    53. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 179 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    54. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 179 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 179 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 179 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 21 of the 179 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 179 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 179 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    16/28

    16

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

    has had knowledge of the 179 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

    the 179 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    55. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 179 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    56. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 179 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    57.

    Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to cause

    irreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Fujitsus Infringement of the 479 Patent)

    58. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 57 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    59. Upon information and belief, Fujitsu has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 479 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    60. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 479 Patent, Fujitsu hasbeen inducing infringement of the 479 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    Fujitsus Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 479 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, Fujitsu is selling its Infringing

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    17/28

    17

    Products that are made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 22 of the 479 Patent, to its OEMs and ODMS, and Fujitsu

    knows or should know that these processes are being used in the manufacture of these

    products. Further, upon information and belief, Fujitsu actively entices its OEMs and ODMs

    through advertising, marketing and sales activity to use Fujitsus Infringing Products as part

    of their own infringing products and to sell, offer for sale, and import those infringing

    products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products in the United States. Upon information and

    belief, Fujitsus OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 479 Patent by using, selling, offering

    for sale, and importing in the United States products containing Fujitsus Infringing Products.

    Upon information and belief, Fujitsu knows that by using, selling, offering for sale, and

    importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the 479 Patent. Upon

    information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and has not stopped since the

    initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 23 above, upon information and belief, Fujitsu

    has had knowledge of the 479 Patent since July 2013, and was provided additional notice of

    the 479 Patent on May 21, 2014.

    61. As a result of Fujitsus infringement of the 479 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from Fujitsu the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    62. Fujitsu will continue to infringe the 479 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    63. Fujitsus acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until Fujitsu is enjoined by this Court.

    SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 651 Patent)

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    18/28

    18

    64. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 63 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    65.

    Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directly

    infringing one or more claims of the 651 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    66. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 651 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 651 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 651 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 20 of the 651 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    651 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 651 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    19/28

    19

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 651 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 651 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    67. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 651 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    68. TSMC will continue to infringe the 651 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    69. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 773 Patent)

    70. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 69 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    71. Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 773 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    72. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 773 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 773 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 773 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    20/28

    20

    process in accordance with Claim 21 of the 773 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    773 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 773 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 773 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 773 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    73. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 773 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    74. TSMC will continue to infringe the 773 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    75. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 775 Patent)

    76. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 75 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    77. Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directly

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    21/28

    21

    infringing one or more claims of the 775 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    78. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 775 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 775 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 775 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 15 of the 775 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    775 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 775 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 775 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 775 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    79. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 775 Patent, Zond has suffered and

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    22/28

    22

    will continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    80. TSMC will continue to infringe the 775 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    81. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 511 Patent)

    82. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 81 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    83. Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 511 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    84. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 511 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 511 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 511 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 28 of the 511 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    23/28

    23

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    511 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 511 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 511 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 511 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    85. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 511 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    86. TSMC will continue to infringe the 511 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    87. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 179 Patent)

    88. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 87 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    89. Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 179 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    24/28

    24

    90. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 179 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 179 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 179 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 21 of the 179 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    179 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 179 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 179 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 179 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    91. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 179 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    92. TSMC will continue to infringe the 179 Patent unless and until it is enjoined

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    25/28

    25

    by this Court.

    93. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    TWELFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (TSMCs Infringement of the 479 Patent)

    94. Zond incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 93 of the Complaint as ifset forth here in full.

    95. Upon information and belief, TSMC has been and is currently directlyinfringing one or more claims of the 479 Patent by using, offering to sell and selling within

    the United States, and importing into the United States, without authority, the Infringing

    Products, including without limitation under 35 U.S.C. 271(g).

    96. Upon information and belief, upon knowledge of the 479 Patent, TSMC hasbeen inducing infringement of the 479 Patent by, among other things, knowingly and with

    intent, actively encouraging its customers, suppliers, original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs), to use, sell, offer for sale, and import

    TSMCs Infringing Products in a manner that constitutes infringement of one or more claims

    of the 479 Patent. For example, upon information and belief, TSMC is manufacturing its

    Infringing Products made by Zonds patented processes, including without limitation by the

    process in accordance with Claim 22 of the 479 Patent. Further, upon information and belief,

    TSMC actively entices its OEMs and ODMs through advertising, marketing and sales activity

    to use TSMCs Infringing Products as part of their own infringing products and to sell, offer

    for sale, and import those infringing products containing TSMCs Infringing Products in the

    United States. Upon information and belief, TSMCs OEMs and ODMs directly infringe the

    479 Patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and importing in the United States products

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    26/28

    26

    containing TSMCs Infringing Products. Upon information and belief, TSMC knows that by

    using, selling, offering for sale, and importing such products its OEMs and ODMs directly

    infringe the 479 Patent. Upon information and belief, this inducing activity is ongoing and

    has not stopped since the initiation of this action. As stated in Paragraph 27 above, upon

    information and belief, TSMC has had knowledge of the 479 Patent since July 2013, and was

    provided additional notice of the 479 Patent on May 21, 2014 and June 5, 2014.

    97. As a result of TSMCs infringement of the 479 Patent, Zond has suffered andwill continue to suffer damage. Zond is entitled to recover from TSMC the damages adequate

    to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined.

    98. TSMC will continue to infringe the 479 Patent unless and until it is enjoinedby this Court.

    99. TSMCs acts of infringement have caused and will continue to causeirreparable harm to Zond unless and until TSMC is enjoined by this Court.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Zond prays for a Judgment in favor of Zond and against Fujitsu and TSMC as

    follows:

    1. That Fujitsu has directly infringed the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479Patents;

    2. That Fujitsu has indirectly infringed the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479Patents;

    3. That TSMC has directly infringed the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479Patents;

    4. That TSMC has indirectly infringed the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    27/28

    27

    Patents;

    5. That this case is exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 285 againsteach of Fujitsu and TSMC;

    6. An order enjoining Fujitsu, TSMC and each of their affiliates, subsidiaries,officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, licensees, successors, assigns, and all

    those acting for them and on their behalf, or acting in concert with them directly or indirectly,

    from further acts of infringement of the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479 Patents;

    7. A full accounting for and an award of damages to Zond for Fujitsus andTSMCs infringement of the 651, 773, 775, 511, 179 and 479 Patents, including

    enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284, together with pre- and post-judgment interest;

    8. An award of Zonds reasonable attorneys fees, expenses, and costs; and9. A grant of such other and further equitable or legal relief as this Court deems

    proper.

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Zond hereby demands trial by jury on all issues so triable.

    Dated: June 9, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

    ZOND, LLC

    By its counsel,

    /s/David S. Godkin

    David S. Godkin (BBO#196530)Andrew A. Caffrey III (BBO#660481)

    Birnbaum & Godkin, LLP

    280 Summer StreetBoston, MA 02210

    617-307-6100

    [email protected]@birnbaumgodkin.com

  • 8/12/2019 Zond v. Fujitsu Semiconductor et. al.

    28/28

    Of Counsel:

    David C. Radulescu, Ph.D.

    Tigran VardanianRADULESCU LLP

    136 Madison Ave, 6th

    FloorNew York, NY 10016

    646-502-5950

    [email protected]@radulescullp.com