-
From Claringbullite to a new spin liquid candidate
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl
Zili Feng,1, 2, ∗ Wei Yi,3, ∗ Kejia Zhu,1 Yuan Wei,1, 2 Shanshan
Miao,1 Jie Ma,4, 5
Jianlin Luo,1, 2, 6 Shiliang Li,1, 2, 6, † Zi Yang Meng,1, 7, 8,
‡ and Youguo Shi1, 2, §
1Beijing National Laboratory of Condensed Matter Physics and
Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190,
China
2School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100190, China3Nano Electronics Device Materials
group, National Institure for
Materials Science (NIMS), 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044,
Japan4Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum
Control,
School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China5Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced
Microstructures, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210093, China
6Collaborative Innovation Center of Quantum Matter, Beijing
100190, China7CAS Center of Excellence in Topological Quantum
Computation and School of Physical Sciences,
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190,
China8Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong
523808, China
(Dated: December 17, 2018)
The search for quantum spin liquid (QSL) materials has attracted
significant attention in thefield of condensed matter physics in
recent years, but until now only a handful of them are consid-ered
as candidates hosting QSL ground state. Owning to their
geometrically frustrated structure,Kagome materials are ideal
system to realize QSL. In this study, we synthesized the kagome
struc-tured material Claringbullite (Cu4(OH)6FCl) and then replaced
inter-layer Cu with Zn to formCu3Zn(OH)6FCl. Comprehensive
measurements reveal that doping Zn
2+ ions transforms magnet-ically ordered Cu4(OH)6FCl into a
non-magnetic QSL candidate Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. Therefore, thesuccessful
syntheses of Cu4(OH)6FCl and Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl not only provide a new
platform for thestudy of QSL but also a novel pathway of
investigating the transition between QSL and magneticallyordered
systems.
In recent years, the search for quantum spin liquid(QSL)
materials, usually realized in frustrated magnets,has attracted
great interests due to the exotic anyonicexcitations therein as
well as their potential relationshipwith quantum computation and
unconventional super-conductivity [1–6]. The common search ground
for QSLare frustrated magnets with honeycomb, triangular andkagome
structures. Kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnetis a promising
direction for the pursuit of QSL groundstate. Although several
kagome materials are proposedto host QSL ground states, the
detailed nature of theseQSLs candidates still need further
intensive investiga-tions to verify [7–12].
Among the discovered kagome Heisenberg antiferro-magnetic QSL
candidates [10, 13, 14], Herbertsmithite,ZnCu3(OH)6Cl2 [7, 9,
15–17] and Zn-doped Barlowite,Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr [10–12, 18–21] are the
two well-knownkagome QSL materials. In particular, the
high-qualitysingle crystal of Herbertsmithite provides the rare
op-portunity to explicitly reveal the detailed momentum-frequency
dependence of the magnetic spectra in in-elastic neutron scattering
experiment, in which thespinon continuum manifest [7]. Meanwhile,
many relatedmaterials are also studied, such as
Cu3Mg(OH)6Cl2,Cu3Cd(OH)6SO4, Y3Cu9(OH)19Cl8 and
YCu3(OH)6Cl3[22–27]. To synthesize a promising kagome QSL
mate-rial, the perfect kagome structure must retain intact andthe
inter-layer interaction shall be reduced, to optimizethe perfect
frustration in the 2D plane in order to sup-
press any magnetic order. Unfortunately, most materialsdevelop
magnetic order at low temperatures which is usu-ally accompanied by
structure distortion that breaks theperfect kagome lattice
geometry.
In this study, we successfully synthesized a newkagome
Heisenberg antiferromagnetic QSL candidate,Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl and its
parent compound Cu4(OH)6FCl(Claringbullite). X-ray diffraction
(XRD) shows pureCu3Zn(OH)6FCl is synthesized and chemical
analysisshow that the content of Zn2+ ions in the inter-kagomeplane
is about 0.7 per formula unit. Although some Cu2+
ions remain in the inter-kagome plane, structure analysisreveals
that the perfect kagome plane is preserved andthermodynamic
measurements show that magnetic orderis completely suppressed in
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. Moreover,our AC magnetic susceptibility (ACMS)
measurementsalso exclude spin glass behavior in Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl,which
is found in other putative QSL candidate [28].All these evidence
suggests Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl is a newQSL candidate. On the other hand,
Claringbullite de-velops magnetic order below 15 K. The evolution
fromCu4(OH)6FCl to Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl, therefore, providesan ideal
occasion to investigate the transition betweenmagnetically ordered
states and QSL, in which the theo-retically expected dynamical
signatures of fractionalizedanyonic excitations [29–31] and other
exotic propertiesof the associated Z2 topologically ordered QSLs
[32, 33]could be experimentally revealed in future.
Cu4(OH)6FCl and Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl were synthesized
arX
iv:1
806.
0080
3v2
[co
nd-m
at.s
tr-e
l] 1
4 D
ec 2
018
-
2
Site w x y z B
Cu 6g 0.5 0 0 1.794(31)
Zn 2d 1/3 2/3 3/4 2.290(117)
Cl 2c 2/3 1/3 3/4 1.336(112)
F 2b 0.0 0.0 3/4 1.767(125)
O 12k 0.20076 0.79924(24) 0.90986(27) 0.112(89)
H 12k 0.12472 0.87528 0.86683 2.265
TABLE I. Structure parameters of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl at
roomtemperature. The space group is P63/mmc (No. 194). Z = 2,a = b
= 6.65377(11) Å, c = 9.18896(11) Å, and V = 352.3166Å3. The
occupancy of Zn site is 0.319 and the others are 1according to a
splitting model [34, 35]. The R indexes areRwp = 4.583 % and Rp =
3.259 %.
using hydrothermal method. For Cu4(OH)6FCl, about0.55 g
Cu2(OH)2CO3 (Alfa Aeser), 0.43 g CuCl2·2H2O(Alfa Aeser), 0.185 g
NH4F (Alfa Aeser) and 0.1 g con-centrated hydrochloric acid (HCl,
mass fraction about35%) were mixed with about 20 mL deionized
waterin a 25 mL vessel. For Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl, about 0.5gCu2(OH)2CO3,
0.38 g ZnCl2·4H2O (Alfa Aeser), 0.095gNH4F and 0.1 g HCl were also
mixed with about 20 mLdeionized water in a 25 mL vessel. The
samples bothwere heated at 200 ◦C for one day and then slowly
cooledto room temperature. Green powder ware collected bywashing
and drying the production.
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl was characterized by powder XRDand no impurity
peaks were found. The measured XRDdata and the calculated pattern,
refined by the Rietveldmethod using the program RIETAN-FP [36] are
plottedin Fig. 1 (a). The refined structure parameters are listedin
Table 1. The XRD measurement was performed atroom temperature on a
Rigaku Smartlab high-resolutiondiffractometer using Cu Kα1
radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å).Two forms of chemical component analysis
were used todetermine the Zn content. First, energy-dispersive
X-rayspectra were measured on a Hitachi S-4800 scanning elec-tron
microscope at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, withan accumulation
time of 90 s. Then, inductively coupledplasma atomic emission
spectroscopy was performed us-ing a Thermo IRIS Intrepid II
instrument. These resultsshow that the stoichiometric ratio of Cu
and Zn ions isabout 3:0.7.
The sample was pressed and cut into pieces about1 mm2 to perform
the thermodynamic measurements.The magnetization data were measured
using a super-conducting quantum interference device
magnetometer(Quantum Design MPMS). The specific heat data
weremeasured in a physical property measurement system(PPMS) at
zero magnetic field between 2 and 30 K andthe specific heat below 2
K was measured using a He-3system.
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl crystallized in hexagonal lattice withspace group
P63/mmc (No. 194). The lattice parame-
FIG. 1. XRD pattern and structure of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl.(a) Powder
XRD data and Rietveld refinement profile ofCu3Zn(OH)6FCl. (b) Top
view (ab plane) of the struc-ture of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. (c) Slide view
of the structure ofCu3Zn(OH)6FCl.
ters are a = b = 6.65377(11) Å, c = 9.18896(11) Å. Asshown in
Fig. 1, Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl has a perfect kagomelattice at room
temperature. The kagome planes showAA stacking and are separated by
Zn2+ ions. Table 1 pro-vides detailed structure parameters of
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl.In Cu4(OH)6FCl, the interlayer Cu
2+ ions split from theequilibrium site and shows three
equivalent positions [35],while in Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl, the interlayer
Zn
2+ ions sit atthe center of the triangle of kagome Cu layer.
Fig. 2 (a) shows the temperature dependence of mag-netic moment
of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl and Cu4(OH)6FCl at1 KOe below 50 K. The vertical
coordination is in log-arithmic scale to highlight the salient
difference. Themoment of Cu4(OH)6FCl increases abruptly at about
17K, which is its magnetic phase transition temperature asreported
in previous study [35], while Cu3Zn(OH)6FClshows no obvious
magnetic order transition down to 2K. Furthermore, the ACMS
measurements at zero mag-netic field show no frequency dependence
down to 2 Kas shown in Fig. 2 (b), which suggests no spin-glass
be-havior [28]. The 1/χ data between 300 K and 2 K ofCu3Zn(OH)6FCl
at 10 KOe in zero-field-cooling (ZFC)and field-cooling (FC)
conditions are shown in the insetof Fig. 2 (a). Curie-Weiss law (χ
= c/(T − θcw)) wasused to fit the data between 150 K and 300 K and
gaveθcw = −223 K. The value of θcw (19.2 meV) indicates astrong
antiferromagnetic interaction between Cu2+ ionsin the kagome layer,
suggesting strong frustration in thesystem. The Curie constant is
1.556 K·emu·mol−1. As-suming S = 1/2 and using the typical g factor
value in
-
3
- 2 5 0 2 5- 5 0 5 0- 3 0 0 0
- 1 5 0 0
0
1 5 0 0
3 0 0 0
1 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
- 2 0 0 - 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 00
1 5 0
3 0 0
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 00 . 0 0
0 . 0 2
0 . 0 4
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l C u 4 ( O H ) 6 F C l
M (em
u·mol-1
)
H ( K O e )
T = 2 K
( b )
M (em
u·mol-1
)
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l C u 4 ( O H ) 6 F C l
H = 1 K O e
( a ) Z F C F C f i t t e d
� -1 (
emu-1
·mol·
Oe)
T ( K )
H = 1 0 K O e� c w = - 2 2 3 K
T ( K )
1 3 H z 3 3 3 H z 9 9 9 H z
M' (e
mu·m
ol-1)
( c )
H = 0 O e
FIG. 2. Magnetic properties of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl andCu4(OH)6FCl.
(a). Temperature dependence of magneticmoment between 2 K and 50 K
at 1 KOe for Cu3Zn(OH)6FCland Cu4(OH)6FCl. Inset:
zero-field-cooling and field-cooling1/χ at 10 KOe for
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. Curie-Weiss fitting (bluedashed line) gives the
Curie temperature θCW = -223 K. (b).The temperature dependence of
the real component of ACMSfor Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. These data were
measured under zeromagnetic field and the peak amplitude of applied
excitationfield was 1 Oe. (c). Field dependence of magnetic moment
ofCu3Zn(OH)6FCl and Cu4(OH)6FCl at 2 K. The blue dashedline is
linear fitting (M = A+ B ×H) of high field magneti-zation for
Cu4(OH)6FCl.
kagome lattice for Cu ions g = 2.3 ± 0.1[10, 34], the Cucontent
can be calculated, 3.28 ± 0.14 per formula unit.This gives that Zn
content is 0.72±0.14 per formula unitwhich is consistent with the
chemical analysis discussedabove.
Fig. 2 (c) shows the field dependence of magne-tization of
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl and Cu4(OH)6FCl at 2K. Cu4(OH)6FCl shows obvious
ferromagnetic behav-ior with the magnetization jump about 0.0865
µB/Cu,while Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl shows no visible hysteresis.
Thecomparison between Cu4(OH)6FCl and Cu3Zn(OH)6FClin Fig. 2 (c)
demonstrates the disappearance of mag-netic order in the latter,
although the Zn content isnot equal to 1. A linear function M = A +
B × H isused to fit the magnetization at high field as shown inFig.
2 (c). Similar fitting analysis has been performedin
Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBr and the Zn content dependence(doping dependence)
of B(x) has been obtained in Fig.6(b) in Ref. [12]. Compared with
the fitting results inFig. 2 (c) here, we find very consistent
value in the x-dependence of the Zn content. For Cu4(OH)6FCl,
weobtain B = 0.035 emu·mol−1, almost the same as thatin
Cu4(OH)6FBr; and for Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl, we obtainB = 0.02 emu·mol−1,
this value is very close to thex = 0.7 value in Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBr,
again suggestingthe success of synthesizes of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl which
maybe a new QSL candidate.
Similar contrasts have also been reported in details inthe
comparisons in the Zn doped Cu4−xZnx(OH)6Cl2which shows hysteresis
and QSL candidate Herbert-smithite Cu3Zn(OH)6Cl2 [37], as well as
the more re-cent Zn doped Barlowite Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBr and theQSL
candidate Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr [12]. Such consistencyfurther reaffirms
that all these three kagome mate-rial families, Cu4−xZnx(OH)6Cl2,
Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBrand Cu4−xZn(OH)xFCl, are ideal platforms of
achiev-ing kagome QSL with x → 1. Moreover, our resultsare
consistent with a previous study on Cu4(OH)6FCl,in which a magnetic
transition at around 15 K was re-ported [35]. Recent neutron
scattering and NMR stud-ies reveal that Cu4(OH)6FBr change its
structure at lowtemperature [12, 20] and such structural change
givesrise to magnetic order. It is possible that a similar pro-cess
happened in Cu4(OH)6FCl as well. Further neu-tron scattering
experiment, similar to that performed onCu4(OH)6FBr [11, 12], will
reveal this process.
Fig. 3 (a) shows the specific heat of Cu3Zn(OH)6FClat zero field
from 0.8 K to 20 K. For comparison, thedata of Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr (from
Fig.2(c) in Ref. [10]) andHerbertsmithite (from Fig.3(a) in Ref.
[34]) were alsoplotted. These three compounds shows similar
behav-ior at low temperatures. Especially, Cu3Zn(OH)6FCland
Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr are nearly coincide below 10 K.The inset shows the
specific heat of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl be-low 5 K at different fields and
no magnetic order wasobserved. As for Cu4(OH)6FCl, the magnetic
order
-
4
2 4 50 . 0
0 . 6
1 . 2
1 . 8
0
5
1 0
0 1 0 2 00 . 0 0
0 . 3 5
0 . 7 0
0 1 0 2 00
2
4
T ( K )
C p (J·
mol-1 ·
K-1)
0 K O e 3 0 K O e 8 0 K O e
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F B r H e r b e r
t s m i t h i t e
C p (J·
mol-1 ·
K-1)
H = 0 O e
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l C u 4 ( O H ) 6 F C l F i t t e d
C p/T (
J·mol-1
·K-2 )
T ( K )
C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F C l C u 3 Z n ( O H ) 6 F B r H e r b e r
t s m i t h i t e C u 4 ( O H ) 6 F C l
( b )
�S (
J·mol-1
·K-1 )
T ( K )
( a )
FIG. 3. Thermal dynamic properties of
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl,Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr, Herbertsmithite, and Cu4(OH)6FCl.
(a).Specific heat at zero magnetic field over temperature
forCu3Zn(OH)6FBr (blue), Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl (black), and
Her-bertsmithite (red). The data of Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr was fromFig.2(c)
in ref.[10] and that of Herbertsmithite was fromFig.3(a) in
ref.[34]. The inset plots the low temperaturesbehavior of
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl at 0 Oe, 30 KOe and 80 KOe.(b) Magnetic entropy of
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl, Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr,Herbertsmithite and Cu4(OH)6FCl. The
inset shows thepecific heat over temperature at zero field below 25
Kof Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl and Cu4(OH)6FCl. The dashed lineare background
contribution of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl fitted usingCbg = aT
2 + bT 3.
transition arises at about 15 ∼ 17 K, which is man-ifested by
the high-temperature peak of Cp/T showedin the inset of Fig. 3 (b).
Further reduce the tem-perature, Cp/T of Cu4(OH)6FCl shows another
peakat 5 K, and Cp/T of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl shows a peakat around 3 K.
These low-temperatur peaks, have alsobeen seen in Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBr
[12, 19] and previ-ous study of Cu4(OH)6FCl [35], as well as in
Herbert-smithite [13, 37, 38]. They are all significantly
affectedby magnetic field, as exemplified in the inset of Fig. 3(a)
for Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl and the inset of Fig.2 (c) for
Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr in Ref. [10]. The current understand-ing of such
behavior is that these are the contributionfrom inter kagome layer
Cu ions [10, 12, 17], which havevery weak interactions among
themselves and are easilypolarized by external field.
One can obtained some information of kagome QSLfrom the current
data by substrate the background con-tribution using the formula
Cbg = aT
2 + bT 3. Thisformula was used to fit the specific heat data
be-tween 20 K and 30 K in zero field for Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl,Cu4(OH)6FBr,
Herbertsmithite, and Cu4(OH)6FCl. Thedashed line in the inset of
Fig.3 (b) shows the fitted datafor Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl. The T
2 term comes from the spincorrelations above 20 K in two
dimensional structure andthe T 3 term, on the other hand, comes
from the threedimensional lattice contribution [34]. Fig.3 (b)
showsmagnetic entropy of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl,
Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr,Herbertsmithite and Cu4(OH)6FCl. At about 20 K,their
magnetic entropies reach corresponding maximalvalues. The entropy
of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl lays between thevalues of Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr and
Herbertsmithite, whilefor Cu4(OH)6FCl, its magnetic entropy is very
close tothat of Cu4(OH)6FBr [12]. These results indicate
thatCu3Zn(OH)6FCl is a QSL candidate.
To summarize, in this work we have successfully syn-thesized a
new QSL candidate material Cu3Zn(OH)6FCland its parent material
Claringbullite Cu4(OH)6FCl andperformed comprehensive thermodynamic
measurementson them. We find Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl is a highly
frustratedkagome material and do not show magnetic order downto 0.8
K and hence is a good candidate for kagome QSL,whereas Cu4(OH)6FCl
is magnetically ordered below 17K. The possible structural change
in Cu4(OH)6FCl ac-companied with the development of magnetic order
isworth to be revealed by elastic neutron scattering. Ourresults
consistently reveal the similarity of the three bynow established
families of the kagome Heisenberg anti-ferromagnets,
Cu4−xZnx(OH)6Cl2, Cu4−xZnx(OH)6FBrand Cu4−xZn(OH)xFCl. As x → 1,
Heisenberg kagomeQSL properties of Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl emerge similar
tothose of Herbertsmithite Cu3Zn(OH)6Cl2 [13] and Zn-doped
Barlowite Cu3Zn(OH)6FBr [10].
Looking into the future, the pathway fromCu4(OH)6FCl to
Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl offers the oppor-tunity to investigate the transition
between magneticallyordered systems to QSL state. Such
investigationswill have a very significant theoretical impact. As
thematerial realization of Z2 topological order, neutronscattering
experiments on the possible kagome QSL inCu3Zn(OH)6FCl and its
transition to the magneticallyorder Claringbullite Cu4(OH)6FCl,
could help to revealthe dynamical signature of the fractionalized
anyonicexcitations in the QSL ground state, as proposed
bytheoretical calculations at vicinity of the QSL to mag-netic
order phase transition [30, 31]. In this regard, thematerials such
as Cu4(OH)6FCl and Cu3Zn(OH)6FCl
-
5
presented in this work, will greatly encourage the
furthertheoretical and experimental developments of the
newparadigms of quantum matter.
This research was supported by the Ministryof Science and
Technology of China through theNational Key Research and
Development Program(2016YFA0300502, 2017YFA0302901,
2016YFA0300604and 2016YFA0300501), the Strategic Priority Re-search
Program of the Chinese Academy of Sci-ences (XDB28000000,
XDB07020100 and QYZDB-SSW-SLH043), the National Natural Science
Foundation ofChina (No.11421092, 11574359, 11674370,
11774399,11474330 and U1732154).
∗ These two authors contribute to this work equally.†
[email protected]‡ [email protected]§ [email protected]
[1] P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).[2] A. Y. Kitaev,
Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003).[3] A. Kitaev and J. Preskill,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404
(2006).[4] L. Balents, Nature 464, 199 (2010).[5] L. Savary and
L. Balents, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016502
(2016).[6] Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, and T. Ng, Rev. Mod. Phys.
89,
025003 (2017).[7] T. H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera,
J. A.
Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Nature492, 406
(2012).
[8] M. X. Fu, T. Imai, T.-H. Han, and Y. S. Lee, Science350, 655
(2015).
[9] M. R. Norman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 041002 (2016).[10] Z. L.
Feng, Z. Li, X. Meng, W. Yi, Y. Wei, J. Zhang,
Y. Wang, W. Jiang, Z. Liu, S. Li, and Z. Y. Meng,Chin. Phys.
Lett. 34, 077502 (2017).
[11] Y. Wei, Z. Feng, W. Lohstroh, C. dela Cruz, W. Yi,Z. F.
Ding, J. Zhang, C. Tan, L. Shu, Y.-C. Wang, et al.,arXiv:1710.02991
(2017).
[12] Z. Feng, Y. Wei, R. Liu, D. Yan, Y.-C. Wang, J. Luo,A.
Senyshyn, C. d. Cruz, W. Yi, J.-W. Mei, Z. Y. Meng,Y. Shi, and S.
Li, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155127 (2018).
[13] T. H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, A. Prodi, D. K. Singh,C.
Mazzoli, P. Müller, D. G. Nocera, and Y. S. Lee,Phys. Rev. B 83,
100402 (2011).
[14] J. Zheng, K. Ran, T. Li, J. Wang, P. Wang, B. Liu,
Z.-X.Liu, B. Normand, J. Wen, and W. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett.119,
227208 (2017).
[15] T. Imai, E. A. Nytko, B. M. Bartlett, M. P. Shores, andD.
G. Nocera, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 077203 (2008).
[16] T. Imai, M. Fu, T. H. Han, and Y. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B84,
020411 (2011).
[17] T.-H. Han, M. R. Norman, J.-J. Wen, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera,
J. S. Helton, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Phys.Rev. B 94, 060409
(2016).
[18] X.-G. Wen, Chinese Physics Letters 34, 90101 (2017).[19] R.
W. Smaha, W. He, J. P. Sheckelton, J. Wen, and Y. S.
Lee, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 268, 123 (2018).[20] K. M.
Ranjith, C. Klein, A. A. Tsirlin, H. Rosner,
C. Krellner, and M. Baenitz, Scientific Reports 8,
10851(2018).
[21] C. M. Pasco, B. A. Trump, T. T. Tran, Z. A. Kelly,C.
Hoffmann, I. Heinmaa, R. Stern, and T. M. McQueen,Phys. Rev.
Materials 2, 044406 (2018).
[22] M. P. Shores, E. A. Nytko, B. M. Bartlett, and D. G.Nocera,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13462 (2005).
[23] R. Colman, A. Sinclair, and A. Wills, Chem. Mater. 23,1811
(2011).
[24] Y. Iqbal, H. O. Jeschke, J. Reuther, R. Valent́ı, I.
Mazin,M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Phys. Rev. B 92,
220404(2015).
[25] A. Pustogow, Y. Li, I. Voloshenko, P. Puphal, C. Krell-ner,
I. I. Mzin, M. Dressel, and R. Valenti, Phys. Rev.B 965, 241114(R)
(2017).
[26] P. Puphal, M. Bolte, D. Sheptyakov, A. Pustogow,K. Kliemt,
M. Dtessel, M. Baenitz, and C. Krellner,J. Mater. Chem. C. 5, 2629
(2017).
[27] W. Sun, Y. X. Huang, S. Nokhrin, Y. Pan, and J. x. Mi,J.
Mater. Chem. C. 4, 8772 (2016).
[28] Z. Ma, J. Wang, Z.-Y. Dong, J. Zhang, S. Li, S.-H.Zheng, Y.
Yu, W. Wang, L. Che, K. Ran, S. Bao, Z. Cai,P. Čermák, A.
Schneidewind, S. Yano, J. S. Gardner,X. Lu, S.-L. Yu, J.-M. Liu, S.
Li, J.-X. Li, and J. Wen,Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 087201 (2018).
[29] J.-W. Mei and X.-G. Wen, ArXiv e-prints
(2015),arXiv:1507.03007 [cond-mat.str-el].
[30] G. Y. Sun, Y.-C. Wang, C. Fang, Y. Qi, M. Cheng, andZ. Y.
Meng, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 077201 (2018).
[31] J. Becker and S. Wessel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121,
077202(2018).
[32] X. G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44, 2664 (1991).[33] X.-G. Wen,
Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017).[34] T. Han, J. Singleton, and J.
A. Schlueter, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 113, 227203 (2014).[35] X. Y. Yue, Z. W. Ouyang, J. F.
Wang, Z. C. Xia, and
Z. Z. He, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054417 (2018).[36] H. M. Rietveld, J.
Appl. Cryst. 2, 65 (1969).[37] M. A. de Vries, K. V. Kamenev, W. A.
Kockelmann,
J. Sanchez-Benitez, and A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 157205
(2008).
[38] J. Helton, K. Matan, M. Shores, E. Nytko, B. Bartlett,Y.
Yoshida, Y. Takano, A. Suslov, Y. Qiu, J.-H. Chung,D. G. Nocera,
and Y. S. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 107204(2007).
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.235.4793.1196http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08917http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025003http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025003http://dx.doi.org/
10.1038/nature11659http://dx.doi.org/
10.1038/nature11659http://dx.doi.org/
10.1126/science.aab2120http://dx.doi.org/
10.1126/science.aab2120http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.041002http://dx.doi.org/
10.1088/0256-307X/34/7/077502https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.02991http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.155127http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.100402http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227208http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227208http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.077203http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.84.020411http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.84.020411http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.94.060409http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.94.060409http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/34/9/090101http://dx.doi.org/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2018.08.016http://dx.doi.org/
10.1038/s41598-018-29080-8http://dx.doi.org/
10.1038/s41598-018-29080-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.044406http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja053891phttp://dx.doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm103160qhttp://dx.doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm103160qhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.220404http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.220404http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.241114http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.96.241114http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6TC05110Chttp://dx.doi.org/
10.1039/C6TC02399Ahttp://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.087201http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.03007http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.077201http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.077202http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.077202http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.2664http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.041004http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.227203http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.227203http://dx.doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevB.97.054417http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0021889869006558http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.157205http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.157205http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.107204http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.107204
From Claringbullite to a new spin liquid candidate
Cu3Zn(OH)6FClAbstract References
