1
Zeolite Refrigeration: Cooling the World’s Vaccines Acknowledgments Advisor: Doug Bradley, Project Coordinator: Steven Laguette Kurt Van Nugtren, Walter Yuen, Nelson Bednersh, Mary Dinh Team Leader: Sarah Morgan, Heidi Attia, Armando Marquez, Austin Roth, and Alex Williams ME 189 CAPSTONE Design Project. June 6, 2008 Abstract The current process of medical supply transport, called the “cold chain,” consists of making several stops en route to reload medical coolers with ice. The availability of ice and the protection of vaccines against high temperatures become important factors in keeping vaccines cool. Our prototype cooler was able to keep our medical storage container below 10° for 3 hours without input electricity. Our design utilizes a zeolite/water adsorption system under vacuum, as well as phase-change material (PCM) heat sinks, and a thin-walled aluminum medical storage container for optimized conduction. Figure 1. Thermodynamic Process Figure 5. Affect of PCM on Zeolite and Water Temperature Conclusion Overall, immense progress has been made in creating a zeolite cooler. We have validated a design that optimizes the shelf distance and zeolite/water ratio, along with exposed surface. We recommend further research in PCM heat sinks and a more robust design. We hope to one day see a portable zeolite cooler for cooling the world’s vaccines. References 1. Boles, Michael, and Ynus A. Çengel. Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach Fifth Edition . New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006. 2. “Latent Heat of Vaporization, The Triple Point of Water.”AVS , 22, Jan. 2008 < http://www.avs.org/pdf/triple%20point.pdf > Introduction & Requirements This design uses a low-grade vacuum to lower the chamber pressure to the saturation pressure of the contained water, causing the water to vaporize. Zeolites, naturally occurring molecular sieves, rapidly absorb the water vapor which forces the water to continue vaporizing. The water temperature decreases according to the energy lost due to vaporization(1). Utilizing experimental data and theory from previous research, in addition to our own data and theory, a prototype was built using the following requirements: Maintain effective pressure of 0.61 kPa Maintain temperature between 0-10°C for 3 hours With the pressure requirement met, the thermodynamic process between the water and zeolites will successfully occur, lowering the water temperature inside of the chamber and keeping our medical storage container below 10° C. Energy Balance Energy Balance Q Q water water + + Q Q convection convection = = E E vapor vapor (1) (1) mc mc p p T + (h T + (h stag,air stag,air A A T)*t = T)*t = h h fg fg m m vaporized vaporized Methods A lab prototype of a medical storage container and cooling chamber (Fig 2b-c) was fabricated to study the transient temperatures in the chamber during the thermodynamic process. The lab model consists of three thermocouples and a shelf to hold the zeolites (Fig. 2a). Results It was found that the closer the zeolites are to the water surface, the quicker the water cools (Fig. 3). Figure 3. Shelf Distance Figure 4. Zeolite/Water Ratio A 5:1 zeolite ratio formed ice the quickest by reaching 0°C in approximately three minutes (Fig. 4). Even though the 10:1 and 5:1 ratio had similar paths, the 10:1 ratio is less efficient. The 10:1 ratio requires more zeolites to achieve nearly the same path as the 5:1 ratio. A longevity test was completed over a span of 3 hours using PCM. As seen in Figure 6, by the end of the 3 hour test period, the water was still measured to be below 10°C, which fulfills our requirement. While testing to improve the duration of our cooling process, the use of PCM heat sinks significantly improved our design. PCM heat sinks provide a means of absorbing heat from the zeolite bed, preventing the heat from circulating and affecting the ice created in the chamber. Figure 6. Successful 3 hour Test B C D A Figure 2. A) Setup of lab model testing B) Lid C) Base of medical storage container D) Insulated medical container 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Compare 2 tests- Control without PCM and W ith PCM Time(minutes) Temperature(C) Control Zeolite Control Water Zeolite with PCM Water with PCM 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (minutes) Temperature (C) Longevity Test-May 19 Zeolite Temperature Water Temperature

Zeolite Refrigeration: Cooling the World’s Vaccines · Zeolite Refrigeration: Cooling the World’s Vaccines Acknowledgments Advisor: Doug Bradley, Project Coordinator: Steven Laguette

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Zeolite Refrigeration: Cooling the Worlds Vaccines

    AcknowledgmentsAdvisor: Doug Bradley, Project Coordinator: Steven LaguetteKurt Van Nugtren, Walter Yuen, Nelson Bednersh, Mary Dinh

    Team Leader: Sarah Morgan, Heidi Attia, Armando Marquez, Austin Roth, and Alex Williams

    ME 189 CAPSTONE Design Project. June 6, 2008

    AbstractThe current process of medical supply transport, called the cold chain, consists of making several stops en route to reload medical coolers with ice. The availability of ice and the protection of vaccines against high temperatures become important factors in keeping vaccines cool.

    Our prototype cooler was able to keep our medical storage container below 10 for 3 hours without input electricity. Our design utilizes a zeolite/water adsorption system under vacuum, as well as phase-change material (PCM) heat sinks, and a thin-walled aluminum medical storage container for optimized conduction.

    Figure 1. Thermodynamic Process

    Figure 5. Affect of PCM on Zeolite and Water Temperature

    Conclusion Overall, immense progress has been made in creating a zeolite cooler. We have validated a design that optimizes the shelf distance and zeolite/water ratio, along with exposed surface. We recommend further research in PCM heat sinks and a more robust design. We hope to one day see a portable zeolite cooler for cooling the worlds vaccines.

    References1. Boles, Michael, and Ynus A. engel. Thermodynamics: An Engineering

    Approach Fifth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.2. Latent Heat of Vaporization, The Triple Point of Water.AVS , 22, Jan.

    2008 < http://www.avs.org/pdf/triple%20point.pdf >

    Introduction & RequirementsThis design uses a low-grade vacuum to lower the chamber pressure to the saturation pressure of the contained water, causing the water to vaporize. Zeolites, naturally occurring molecular sieves, rapidly absorb the water vapor which forces the water to continue vaporizing. The water temperature decreases according to the energy lost due to vaporization(1). Utilizing experimental data and theory from previous research, in addition to our own data and theory, a prototype was built using the following requirements: Maintain effective pressure of 0.61 kPa Maintain temperature between 0-10C for 3 hours

    With the pressure requirement met, the thermodynamic process between the water and zeolites will successfully occur, lowering the water temperature inside of the chamber and keeping our medical storage container below 10 C. Energy BalanceEnergy Balance

    QQwaterwater ++ QQconvectionconvection = = EEvaporvapor(1) (1) mcmcpp T + (hT + (hstag,airstag,airA A T)*t = T)*t = hhfgfgmmvaporizedvaporized

    MethodsA lab prototype of a medical storage container and cooling chamber (Fig 2b-c) was fabricated to study the transient temperatures in the chamber during the thermodynamic process. The lab model consists of three thermocouples and a shelf to hold the zeolites (Fig. 2a).

    ResultsIt was found that the closer the zeolites are to the water surface, the quicker the water cools (Fig. 3).

    Figure 3. Shelf Distance Figure 4. Zeolite/Water Ratio

    A 5:1 zeolite ratio formed ice the quickest by reaching 0C in approximately three minutes (Fig. 4). Even though the 10:1 and 5:1 ratio had similar paths, the 10:1 ratio is less efficient. The 10:1 ratio requires more zeolites to achieve nearly the same path as the 5:1 ratio.

    A longevity test was completed over a span of 3 hours using PCM. As seen in Figure 6, by the end of the 3 hour test period, the water was still measured to be below 10C, which fulfills our requirement.

    While testing to improve the duration of our cooling process, the use of PCM heat sinks significantly improved our design. PCM heat sinks provide a means of absorbing heat from the zeolite bed, preventing the heat from circulating and affecting the ice created in the chamber.

    Figure 6. Successful 3 hour Test

    B

    C

    D

    A

    Figure 2. A) Setup of lab model testing B) Lid C) Base of medical storage container D) Insulated medical container 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Compare 2 tests- Control without PCM and W ith PCM

    Time(minutes)

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    (C)

    Control ZeoliteControl W aterZeolite with PCMW ater with PCM

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Time (minutes)

    Tempe

    rature (C

    )

    Longevity Test-May 19

    Zeolite TemperatureWater Temperature