Upload
hoangtuyen
View
227
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Zeolite Refrigeration: Cooling the Worlds Vaccines
AcknowledgmentsAdvisor: Doug Bradley, Project Coordinator: Steven LaguetteKurt Van Nugtren, Walter Yuen, Nelson Bednersh, Mary Dinh
Team Leader: Sarah Morgan, Heidi Attia, Armando Marquez, Austin Roth, and Alex Williams
ME 189 CAPSTONE Design Project. June 6, 2008
AbstractThe current process of medical supply transport, called the cold chain, consists of making several stops en route to reload medical coolers with ice. The availability of ice and the protection of vaccines against high temperatures become important factors in keeping vaccines cool.
Our prototype cooler was able to keep our medical storage container below 10 for 3 hours without input electricity. Our design utilizes a zeolite/water adsorption system under vacuum, as well as phase-change material (PCM) heat sinks, and a thin-walled aluminum medical storage container for optimized conduction.
Figure 1. Thermodynamic Process
Figure 5. Affect of PCM on Zeolite and Water Temperature
Conclusion Overall, immense progress has been made in creating a zeolite cooler. We have validated a design that optimizes the shelf distance and zeolite/water ratio, along with exposed surface. We recommend further research in PCM heat sinks and a more robust design. We hope to one day see a portable zeolite cooler for cooling the worlds vaccines.
References1. Boles, Michael, and Ynus A. engel. Thermodynamics: An Engineering
Approach Fifth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006.2. Latent Heat of Vaporization, The Triple Point of Water.AVS , 22, Jan.
2008 < http://www.avs.org/pdf/triple%20point.pdf >
Introduction & RequirementsThis design uses a low-grade vacuum to lower the chamber pressure to the saturation pressure of the contained water, causing the water to vaporize. Zeolites, naturally occurring molecular sieves, rapidly absorb the water vapor which forces the water to continue vaporizing. The water temperature decreases according to the energy lost due to vaporization(1). Utilizing experimental data and theory from previous research, in addition to our own data and theory, a prototype was built using the following requirements: Maintain effective pressure of 0.61 kPa Maintain temperature between 0-10C for 3 hours
With the pressure requirement met, the thermodynamic process between the water and zeolites will successfully occur, lowering the water temperature inside of the chamber and keeping our medical storage container below 10 C. Energy BalanceEnergy Balance
QQwaterwater ++ QQconvectionconvection = = EEvaporvapor(1) (1) mcmcpp T + (hT + (hstag,airstag,airA A T)*t = T)*t = hhfgfgmmvaporizedvaporized
MethodsA lab prototype of a medical storage container and cooling chamber (Fig 2b-c) was fabricated to study the transient temperatures in the chamber during the thermodynamic process. The lab model consists of three thermocouples and a shelf to hold the zeolites (Fig. 2a).
ResultsIt was found that the closer the zeolites are to the water surface, the quicker the water cools (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Shelf Distance Figure 4. Zeolite/Water Ratio
A 5:1 zeolite ratio formed ice the quickest by reaching 0C in approximately three minutes (Fig. 4). Even though the 10:1 and 5:1 ratio had similar paths, the 10:1 ratio is less efficient. The 10:1 ratio requires more zeolites to achieve nearly the same path as the 5:1 ratio.
A longevity test was completed over a span of 3 hours using PCM. As seen in Figure 6, by the end of the 3 hour test period, the water was still measured to be below 10C, which fulfills our requirement.
While testing to improve the duration of our cooling process, the use of PCM heat sinks significantly improved our design. PCM heat sinks provide a means of absorbing heat from the zeolite bed, preventing the heat from circulating and affecting the ice created in the chamber.
Figure 6. Successful 3 hour Test
B
C
D
A
Figure 2. A) Setup of lab model testing B) Lid C) Base of medical storage container D) Insulated medical container 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Compare 2 tests- Control without PCM and W ith PCM
Time(minutes)
Tem
pera
ture
(C)
Control ZeoliteControl W aterZeolite with PCMW ater with PCM
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Time (minutes)
Tempe
rature (C
)
Longevity Test-May 19
Zeolite TemperatureWater Temperature