ZBB Study: Review and Assessment of Programs Offered by State Universities and Colleges

7/21/2019 ZBB Study: Review and Assessment of Programs Offered by State Universities and Colleges

1/31

Philippine Institute for Development Studies

Rosario G. Manasan and Danileen C. Parel


2 September 2014

Review & Assessmentof Programs Oeredby State Universities

and Colleges (SUCs)


2/31


Overview of presentation

Objetives of t!e st"dyApproa! and met!odology

#indings

#"t"re steps


3/31


Objetives of t!e st"dy

Review and assess t!e dierent

programs being oered by t!emajor SUCs in regions notinl"ded in t!e earlier st"dy vis$%$vis t!eir mandates

Program d"pliation (ie' o"rsesbeing oered by ot!er SUCs andot!er SUCs in t!e same region)

t!e "ality of grad"ates prod"ed

Reommend o"rses of ation as

well as an ation plan to p"rs"egiven t!e ndings above toimprove t!e relevane and "alityof o"rse oerings of t!e SUCs


4/31


Motivation of the study

*!y t!e onern abo"t fait!f"lness to

mandates+ Oering programs o"tside mandate

inreases n"mber of program oerings!ig!er per st"dent ost wastef"lness

Oering program o"tside mandate

program d"pliation

*!y t!e onern abo"t programd"pliation+

Program d"pliation rowding o"t ofprivate setor

*!y t!e onern abo"t "ality+

Creation of SUCs typially attrib"ted tot!e need for aess' b"t aess is onlymeaningf"l if one also gets "ality


5/31


Approa! & met!odology

Coverage , all SUCs aross allregions

-es. review of program oerings'enrolment t!erein and passingrates in P/0s of individ"al SUCs

1ey informant interviewsond"ted wit! seleted SUCs

o2ials' and regional o2ials oft!e Commission on 3ig!er0d"ation (C30-) and t!e 4ational0onomi and -evelopmentA"t!ority (40-A)


6/31



Objetives of t!e st"dy Approa! and met!odology

#indings

SUC program oering vis$%$vis t!eir mandates

Program d"pliation

5"ality of instr"tion

#"t"re steps


7/31Philippine Institute for Development Studies

SUCs program oering vis t!eir mandates

678$978 of programs oered by majority of

SUCs are o"tside t!eir ore mandates Some :7 SUCs !ave limited mandates

;ore t!an 678 of all SUCs allowed by t!eir!arters to oer programs o"tside of t!eirore mandates at t!e disretion of t!e /oardof panding t!eirmandates

;andate of some SUCs are broad and allenompassing to start wit!



Program d"pliation

?iven prevalene of SUCs wit! programoerings o"tside t!eir ore mandates' it isnot s"rprising t!at t!ere is d"pliation int!eir program oerings relative to t!ose ofot!er SUCs and P30@s in t!e same region

SUCs programs lassied into

o programs t!at are "ni"e to t!e SUC

"nder st"dyo programs t!at are oered by t!e

given SUC and any one of t!e ot!erSUCs b"t are not oered by P30@s int!e same region

o programs t!at are oered by t!egiven SUC and any one of t!e P30@sb"t are not oered by any one of t!eot!er SUCs in t!e same region

o programs t!at are oered by t!egiven SUC and any one of t!e ot!er

SUCs and any one of t!e P30@s in t!esame region



Program d"pliation

On t!e average' t!e program d"pliation rate varies from B8$68 ifomp"ted based on total n"mber of program oerings and 98$9:8if omp"ted based on total enrollment



Program d"pliation

Over 78 of all t!e SUCs overed"nder t!is st"dy registeredd"pliation rates (omp"ted based onn"mber of programs oered) t!at are"pwards of 68

3ig!est -"pliation rateD Region E@@

F8$978 (total n"mber ofprogram oerings)

9F8$998 (based on totalenrollment)

Gowest -"pliation rateD AR;; F98$=8 (total n"mber of

programs oered)

:8$F8 (based on totalenrollment)



Program d"pliation

3ig! rates of programd"pliation appeared to beassoiated wit! an inrease in

t!e n"mber of programs oeredby SUCs d"ring t!e period

Aro"nd 78 of t!e SUCsovered !ave inreased t!en"mber of programs t!eyare oering in :776$:7=7



*!y is program d"pliation an iss"e+

Res"lts of ;anasan (:7==)s"ggests n"mber of programsoered tend to inrease perst"dent ost of SUCs

#?-s wit! private !ig!ered"ation instit"tions (P30@s)indiate t!at programd"pliation is a problem from

t!eir perspetive Crowding o"t

Uneven playing eld



SUC are rowding o"t P30@s H

P30@s o2ials point o"t t!at w!enSUCs oer programs t!at P30@straditionally oer P30@s nd itdi2"lt to ompete against SUCsin attrating st"dents bea"se oft!e low t"ition t!at SUCs !arged

Alt!o"g! C30- provides!olars!ips t!at allowst"dents to enroll in s!ool oft!eir !oie' t!e s"pport val"eis low relative to t"ition

!arged by P30@s *!en enrollment in programdelines ontin"o"sly' fa"ltyretren!ment annot beavoided sometimes



Uneven playing eld H

;any P30@s also dery w!at t!ey

pereived to be a do"ble standard inreg"lationI monitoring of SUCs and P30@sby C30-

Some C30- regional o2ials admitt!at C30- !as di2"lty applying t!esame standards on SUCs bea"se of

t!e so$alled Ja"tonomyK t!at t!eirC!arters vest on SUCs

Aording to P30@s' SUCs oer o"rsesdespite t!e fat SUCs do not !ave t!eneeded failities and "alied fa"ltyw!ile C30- stritly enfores t!e its

Poliies' Standards and ?"idelines(PS?) on P30@s (espeially tr"e ofsatellite amp"ses)

o *it! detrimental impat on "alityof instr"tion and P/0 passing rates



Program d"pliation , a non$iss"e+

Some SUC o2ials say t!atprogram d"pliation amongSUCs and P30@s is a non$iss"e

An important goal of SUCs is

providing aess and e"ityo4eed to onsider

geograp!ial !arateristiof regionL d"pliation may

be neessary w!en yo"!ave regions omposed ofisland provines



Program d"pliation , w!en t!e s!oe is on t!e ot!er foot

Some SUC o2ials t!in. t!atbran!es of national"niversities (eg' UP' PUP'





Approa! and met!odology

#indings

SUC program oering vis$%$vist!eir mandates

Program d"pliation


#"t"re steps



5"ality of instr"tion in 30@s

;edian passing rate for B P/0s :776$:7== ranged fromM78 to M8

only =7 o"t of t!ese B P/0s !ad average passing rates

above F78 and only F !ave passing rates above 78




On average' SUCs perform better t!an P30@s inM8 of t!e P/0s from :776$:7==

SUCs improve t!eir advantage f"rt!er d"ringt!e period in abo"t B=8 of P/0s $riminology' "stoms administration' forestry'geology' elementary ed"ation' marineengineering' medial te!nology' midwifery'mining engineering and n"rsing

3owever' edge t!at SUCs "sed to enjoy in t!eearly part of t!e period !as eroded in abo"tF98 of t!e P/0s , ao"ntany' aerona"tialengineering' ar!itet"re' !emialengineering' !emistry' ivil engineering'dental mediine' eletrial engineering'eletronis engineering' environmental

planning' geodeti engineering' interiordesign' library siene' marinetransportation' me!anial engineering'mediine' n"trition and dietetis'o"pational t!erapy' p!armay' p!ysialt!erapy' soial wor. and veterinary mediine


20/31



*orrisome t!at t!ere is apreponderane of SUCsI P30@s wit!Nero passing rate in many P/0s

ie' w!en SUCs are ran.edaording to P/0 passing rateand gro"ped' t!e largest n"mberof SUCs fall in Nero passing rate

ategory

P i t i A t / d


21/31


Passing rate in Ao"ntany /oard

P i t i A t / d


22/31


Passing rate in Ao"ntany /oard


23/31


;any SUCs!ave Nero

passing ratein P/0s int!ree yearsin :776$:7==

Gist of SUCswit! passingrates belownational

average iseven longer


24/31



An average SUC passingrate t!at is above t!atnational average does notg"arantee t!at satellite

amp"ses are performing aswell


25/31




Approa! and met!odology

#indings

SUC program oering vis$%$vist!eir mandates

Program d"pliation


#"t"re steps

R d ti


26/31


Reommendations


27/31


Reommendations

@mprove C30-s ability to ens"re t!at

SUCs program oerings omply wit!its Poliies' Standards and ?"idelines(PS?s) for t!ese programs

C30- to stritly apply standards onSUCs proposing to open new programs

regional o2es to do so pat!y atpresent

R d ti


28/31


Reommendations

SUCs may be allowed to oerJpop"larK programs provided t!eymeet C30- standards and providedt!ey do not e>pet 4? s"bsidy for

enrollment in t!ese programs One of t!e SUCs in t!e Eisayas

did t!is w!en it was press"red tooer 4"rsing

4eed to twea. normative

naning form"la to p"t t!is intoeet

R d ti


29/31


Reommendations

;any of meas"res t!at SUCsp"t in plae to improve "alityof instr"tion (eg' reviewlasses' administration of pre$board e>ams w!ere non$

passers not given ertiationneeded to ta.e P/0) areill"sory

;anasan (:7==) indiatest!at "aliation of fa"lty is

.ey

R d ti


30/31


Reommendations

C30- s!o"ld enfore morevigoro"sly its poliy of losinge>isting programs of SUCs andP30@s ali.e w!ere t!ese 30@sperformane is "nder par

C30- s!o"ld also onsiderapplying t!is r"le to satelliteamp"ses independently of mainamp"ses


31/31

Phl I f D l S d

Thank You!

Documents

ZBB Study: Review and Assessment of Programs Offered by State Universities and Colleges