22
Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Z556 Systems Analysis & DesignSession 13

ILS

Z5

56

1

Page 2: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Final Project Presentation

• 15-20 minutes each• Every member of the team should be

involved• Follow the outline of the final

document, but include a report on feedback from the client/users

• You are welcome to invite your clients

ILS

Z5

56

2

Page 3: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Final Specification Document• The deadline is 5pm on Wednesday,

April 29. Your team needs to submit both a hard copy and an electronic copy to Oncourse

ILS

Z5

56

3

Page 4: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Tips for Writing the Final Specification Document• Executive summary should be a separate

document• can use the drafts you’ve previously submitted

for this semester• Should include work models in the documents & explain these models in the text.• If models are peripheral or too much details to be

included in the text (in other words, that would distract the readers from seeing the problems/current situation, include them in Appendices (but make sure to point them in the text).

ILS

Z5

56

4

Page 5: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Tips for Writing the Final Specification Document• Include data you’ve collected to demonstrate

current problems (e.g., quotes and examples) in order to either demonstrate the problems or justify the salutation (or both)

• Data collection methods can be included in the appendix if the client request it

• Conclusion in the final specification document should encourage the client to pursue the solutions you suggested

ILS

Z5

56

5

Page 6: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Design Ideas (Verganti, 2006)

• Functionality vs. form

• Design change the experience though $169.00 a piece

ILS

Z5

56

6

Verganti, R. (2006). Innovating through design. Harvard Business Review. 84(12), 114-122.

Page 7: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Exeprience Design vs. Interface Design (Buxton, 2007)

• Even $400 a piece

• The “difference did not come by accident”

ILS

Z5

56

7

Page 8: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Organizational Change

• Designing information systems for end users is as much about changing the behavior of users as it is about the technology itself (Regan & O’Connor, 1994)

ILS

Z5

56

8

Page 9: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Planned Organizational Change• Information analysts needs to be

technical experts as well as effective change agents

• Planned change has both:• a technical and • a social aspect

ILS

Z5

56

9

Page 10: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Business Analyst Manifesto (Brandenburg, 2010)

Out of chaos, we create orderOut of disagreement, we create alignmentOut of ambiguity, we create clarityBut most of all, we create positive change for the organizations we serve

ILS

Z5

56

10Brandenburg, L. (2010). How to start a business analyst career: A roadmap to startAn IT career in business analysis or find entry-level business analyst jobs. CreateSpace.

Page 11: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

The 10 Golden Rules of Systems Analysis (Gibson, et al., 2007)

• Rule 1: there always a client• Rule 2: your client does not understand his/her

own problem• Rule 3: the original problem statement is too

specific: you must generalize the problem to give it contextual integrity

• Rule 4: the client does not understand the concept of the index of performance

ILS

Z5

56

11

Page 12: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

The 10 Golden Rules of Systems Analysis (Gibson, et al., 2007)

• Rule 5: you are the analyst, not the decision-maker• Rule 6: meet the time deadline and the cost budget• Rule 7: take a goal-centered approach to the problem,

not a technology-centered or chronological approach• Rule 8: nonusers must be considered in the analysis and

in the final recommendations• Rule 9: the universal computer model is a fantasy• Rule 10: the role of decision-maker in public systems is

often a confused one

ILS

Z5

56

12

Page 13: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Agile

• Agile – based on the 12 original principle: Agile Manifesto

ILS

Z5

56

13

Page 14: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Understanding Resistance to Change

• Social uncertainty• Limited perspectives• Lack of understanding• Resistance to technical personnel• Perception that costs outweigh benefits• Fear of failure or inadequacy• Loss of control• Feelings of insecurity• Threat of economic loss

ILS

Z5

56

14

Page 15: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Overcoming Resistance to Change (HWW, Ch 16)

• Water drop method• Make your project visible• ROI

• Defining requirements• Time to code• Customer response

• Develop success stories

ILS

Z5

56

15

Page 16: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Adoption

• Adopter (Rogers, 1995; 2003)

ILS

Z5

56

16

InnovatorsEarly

adoptersEarly

majorityLate

majorityLaggards

Page 17: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Adoption

• Adopter stage (Dormant, 1986)• Awareness• Self concern• Mental tryout• Hands on trial• Adoption

ILS

Z5

56

17

Air-car byTata Motors

Page 18: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Being A System Analyst

• Solve business problems• Work models• Final specification document

• Manage projects/teams• Communicate solutions to

programmers• UML

• Flow model ~= use case diagram• Sequence model ~= activity diagram• ER diagram ~= class diagram

ILS

Z5

56

18

Page 19: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Beyond the Organizational ‘Container’ (Winter, et al., 2014)• Organizational container, i.e., boundary• Sociotechnical work• Net-STS premises:

• 1. Work system are encapsulated within one or more, potentially overlapping STS

• 2. Work systems have interrelated, possibly complimentary, redundant, competing, or conflicting, social and technical elements that may co-exist without every being fully reconciled

ILS

Z5

56

19

Page 20: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Beyond the Organizational ‘Container’ (Winter, et al., 2014)• Net-STS premises:

• 3. Work systems can derive purpose, meaning, and structure from the multiple contexts

• 4. Creation and continued existence of work systems involves simultaneous support for both performance of work and ongoing negotiation of goals, values, and meaning.

• What would be your reaction if you revisited the organization 3 years from now and found out that the organization followed exactly what you had suggested in this class?

ILS

Z5

56

20

Page 21: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Lessons learned?• Are there any

lessons learned in this class that you’d like to share?

ILS

Z5

56

21

Page 22: Z556 Systems Analysis & Design Session 13 ILS Z556 1

Evaluation

• Team member evaluation

• Course evaluation

ILS

Z5

56

22