Upload
lester-malone
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
YOUR LOGOYOUR LOGO
March 9, 2015
Lead Partner Mid Year Update Presentation – PPSD School Board
YOUR LOGO
Our greatest appreciation, thanks, and hats off to our partners:
“Only by binding together as a single force will we remain strong and unconquerable.”
- Chris Bradford
JSEC Staff & Students MPHS Staff & Students CHS Staff & Students
YOUR LOGO
Important Considerations
In three years, despite…
We still have…
AMO Changes
Change in metrics from NECAP to
STAR
Transition from Paper Pencil to
Technology Assessments
ELA Curriculum Change to
Springboard
Competing Needs for
Technology Hardware
YOUR LOGO
Current Data-Driven Conclusions (2014-2015)
ALL ON TRACK
STAR Math Scores
Math 1st Time Credit Acquisition
Accelerated Math
Intervention
Instructional Practices
Mathematics data for STUDENTS and ADULTS is aligned across all four measures as they are
mostly “on track” by the various goals established.
MIXED RESULTS
STAR ELA Scores
ELA 1st Time Credit Acquisition
Reading Plus
Instructional Practices
English Language Arts data for STUDENTS and ADULTS is NOT entirely aligned across all four
measures as they vary based on measure examined.
YOUR LOGO
ACADEMIC UPDATES
YOUR LOGO
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL
Oct. 2011: Actual
BaselineOct.
2012:Actual
Oct. 2013:Actual
NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
50.5 48.4 55.9
NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
24 34 42
NECAP Math Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
3.8 1.9 5.8
MOUNT PLEASANT HIGH SCHOOL
Oct. 2011: Actual
BaselineOct.
2012:Actual
Oct. 2013:Actual
NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
34 44.9 44.5
NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
12 14 24
NECAP Math Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
5.3 10.9 7.3
JSEC HIGH SCHOOLOct. 2011:
ActualBaseline
Oct. 2012:Actual
Oct. 2013:Actual
NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
42.4 41.7 51.2
NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
31 34 40
NECAP Math Proficiency Overall
(11th grade; teaching year)
6.9 2.3 5.6
NECAPRECAP
YOUR LOGO
MPHS Reading Plus
The average comprehension rate for
the 9th grade is 81%
The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 83%
228 Active Students
62% (142 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers
51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading thus far this school year
35.8 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
YOUR LOGO
MPHS STAR Reading Data (Proficiency)
YOUR LOGO
MPHS STAR Reading Data
MPHS Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
Change*
STAR Reading % Below Benchmark N/A
BOY: 89%MOY: 87%EOY: 87%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 89%MOY: 87%
2% reduction
Ninth Grade N/A
BOY: 88%MOY: 86%EOY: 86%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 88%MOY: 87%
1% reduction
Tenth Grade N/A
BOY: 90%MOY: 85%EOY: 85%
BOY – EOY: 5% reduction
BOY: 91%MOY: 88%
3% reduction
Eleventh Grade N/A
BOY: 92%MOY: 90%EOY: 90%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 88%MOY: 83%
5% reduction
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 87%MOY: 86%EOY: 88%
BOY – EOY: 1% increase
BOY: 90%MOY: 88%
1% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
JSEC Reading Plus
The average comprehension rate for
the 9th grade is 73%
The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 80%
222 Active Students
37% (89 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers
51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading
16.6 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
YOUR LOGO
JSEC STAR Reading Data
YOUR LOGO
JSEC STAR Reading Data
JSEC Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
STAR Math % Below Benchmark5 N/A
BOY: 89%MOY: 89%EOY: 87%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 89%MOY: 89%No Change
Ninth Grade N/A
BOY: 87%MOY: 90%EOY: 85%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 91%MOY: 93%
2% increase
Tenth Grade N/A
BOY: 88%MOY: 88%EOY: 81%
BOY – EOY: 7% reduction
BOY: 89%MOY: 88%
1% reduction
Eleventh Grade N/A
BOY: 86%MOY: 89%EOY: 87%
BOY – EOY: 1% increase
BOY: 86%MOY: 86%
No Change
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 93%MOY: 87%EOY: 94%
BOY – EOY: 1% increase
BOY: 91%MOY: 90%
1% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
Central Reading Plus Data
The average comprehension rate
for the 9th grade is 77%
The average comprehension rate for the 10th grade is 83%
394 Active Students
37% (166 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers
230 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading
38 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
YOUR LOGO
Central STAR Reading Data
YOUR LOGO
CHS STAR Reading Data
CHS Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
STAR Math % Below Benchmark5 N/A
BOY: 87%MOY: 87%EOY: 87%
BOY – EOY: No Change
BOY: 91%MOY: 87%
4% reduction
Ninth Grade N/A
BOY: 87%MOY: 88%EOY: 88%
BOY – EOY: 1% increase
BOY: 93%MOY: 89%
4% reduction
Tenth Grade N/A
BOY: 90%MOY: 90%EOY: 86%
BOY – EOY: 4% reduction
BOY: 90%MOY: 86%
4% reduction
Eleventh Grade N/A
BOY: 88%MOY: 84%EOY: 88%
BOY – EOY: No Change
BOY: 90%MOY: 88%
2% reduction
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 83%MOY: 83%EOY: 84%
BOY – EOY: 1% increase
BOY: 91%MOY: 87%
4% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
MPHS Accelerated Math Intervention
October November December January February0
2
4
6
8
10
12
5
6
8
9
10
Average Number of Objectives Mastered
Month
Nu
mb
er o
f O
bje
ctiv
e
YOUR LOGO
MPHS STAR Math Data
YOUR LOGO
MPHS STAR Math Data
MPHS Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
STAR Math % Below Benchmark5
BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 66%
BOY: 70%MOY: 62%EOY: 55%
BOY – EOY: 5% reduction
BOY: 66%MOY: 62%
4% reduction
Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 69%EOY: 68%
BOY: 80%MOY: 72%EOY: 63%
BOY – EOY: 7% reduction
BOY: 74%MOY: 66%
8% reduction
Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 66%
BOY: 64%MOY: 59%EOY: 45%
BOY – EOY: 19% reduction
BOY: 76%MOY: 76%No Change
Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 72%EOY: 64%
BOY: 68%MOY: 59%EOY: 52%
BOY – EOY: 16% reduction
BOY: 60%MOY: 59%
1% reduction
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 65%MOY: 55%EOY: 60%
BOY – EOY: 5% reduction
BOY: 61%MOY: 57%
4% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
JSEC Accelerated Math Intervention
October November December January February0
2
4
6
8
10
12
5
6
8
9
10
Average Number of Objectives Mastered258 Students
Month
Nu
mb
er o
f O
bje
ctiv
e
YOUR LOGO
JSEC STAR Math Data
YOUR LOGO
JSEC STAR Math Data
JSEC Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
STAR Math % Below Benchmark5
BOY: N/AMOY: 67%EOY: 61%
BOY: 66%MOY: 63%EOY: 58%
BOY – EOY: 8% reduction
BOY: 68%MOY: 60%
8% reduction
Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 71%EOY: 66%
BOY: 79%MOY: 78%EOY: 79%
BOY – EOY: No Change
BOY: 71%MOY: 61%
10% reduction
Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 63%EOY: 54%
BOY: 64%MOY: 61%EOY: 59%
BOY – EOY: 5% reduction
BOY: 75%MOY: 63%
12% reduction
Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 65%EOY: 61%
BOY: 59%MOY: 51%EOY: 45%
BOY – EOY: 14% reduction
BOY: 59%MOY: 60%
1% increase
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 62%MOY: 63%EOY: 52%
BOY – EOY: 10% reduction
BOY: 64%MOY: 53%
11% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
Central Accelerated Math Intervention
September October November December January February0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1
3
7
9
10 10
Average Number of Objectives Mastered1064
Month
Nu
mb
er o
f O
bje
ctiv
es
YOUR LOGO
Central STAR Math Data
YOUR LOGO
CHS STAR Math Data
CHS Performance Measures
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
STAR Math % Below Benchmark5
BOY: N/AMOY: 67%EOY: 61%
BOY: 64%MOY: 61%EOY: 62%
BOY – EOY: 2% reduction
BOY: 65%MOY: 48%
17% reduction
Ninth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 62%
BOY: 73%MOY: 66%EOY: 66%
BOY – EOY: 7% reduction
BOY: 67%MOY: 50%
13% reduction
Tenth Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 60%EOY: 55%
BOY: 58%MOY: 60%EOY: 61%
BOY – EOY: 3% increase
BOY: 65%MOY: 48%
12% reduction
Eleventh Grade BOY: N/AMOY: 70%EOY: 67%
BOY: 56%MOY: 56%EOY: 53%
BOY – EOY: 3% reduction
BOY: 60%MOY: 44%
16% reduction
Twelfth Grade N/A
BOY: 68%MOY: 61%EOY: 64%
BOY – EOY: 4% reduction
BOY: 71%MOY: 50%
21% reduction
*Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
YOUR LOGO
LEADING STUDENT INDICATORS
YOUR LOGO
MPHS Student Leading Indicators
Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
Performance Measures 2011-2012
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Current[Target]
Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4%
[84%]88.3%[85%]
85.5%[86%]
Chronic-Excessive
Absence Rate**57.1% 49.0%
[55.1%]42.0%
[53.1%]42.4%
[51.1%]
Out-of-School Suspensions** 188 164 129 102
[94]
*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
YOUR LOGO
MPHS 1st Time Credit Acquisition
JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
First Time Credit
Acquisition Rate
2011-20122012-2013
Actual[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Projected*
Algebra I 52% (62/119) 68% (110/161)77% (170/222)
71.9%
Geometry 78% (122/156) 86% (179/209)84% (84/100) 75.4%
Intro to Literature 80% (117/146) 87% (223/257)
90%(129/144) 86.0%
World Literature 81% (224/277) 86% (124/145)89% (196/220) 77.6%
*2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%.
Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.
YOUR LOGO
JSEC Student Leading Indicators
Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
Performance Measures 2011-2012
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Actual
[Target]
Student Attendance Data1 82.8% 83.8%
[84%]82.7%[85%]
83.2%[86%]
Chronic-Excessive
Absence Rate256.8% 59.7%
[53.8%]59.7%
[50.8%]50.5%
[47.8%]
Out-of-School Suspensions3 389 235 330 125
[194]
*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
YOUR LOGO
JSEC 1st Time Credit Acquisition
JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
First Time Credit
Acquisition Rate
2011-20122012-2013
Actual[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Projected*
Algebra I 61% (71/116) 53% (105/199)75% (81/108)
75%
Geometry 76% (96/127) 74% (139/189)79% (88/111)
73%
Intro to Literature 79% (131/166) 72% (136/190)
77% (75/97)77%
World Literature 80% (176/220) 80% (111/138)83% (114/137)
92%
*2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%.
Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.
YOUR LOGO
CHS Student Leading Indicators
Leading Indicators Baseline Data Performance Benchmarks
Performance Measures 2011-2012
2012-2013Actual
[Benchmark]
2013-2014Actual
[Benchmark]
2014-2015Current[Target]
Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4%
[84%]88.3%[85%]
85.5%[86%]
Chronic-Excessive
Absence Rate**57.1% 49.0%
[55.1%]42.0%
[53.1%]42.4%
[51.1%]
Out-of-School Suspensions** 188 164 129 102
[94]
*Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
YOUR LOGO
ADULT BEHAVIOR INDICATORS
YOUR LOGO
MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
78%
17%5%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
28%
28%
44%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)18 Teachers
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)18 Teachers
33%
40%
27%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
83%
17%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #3 (Module #1)15 Teachers
54%
15%
31%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
73%
7%
20%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #2 (Module #2)13 Teachers
73%
7%
20%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
46%
27%
27%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)12 Teachers
11%11%
78%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
64%
18%
18%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)12 Teachers
17%
17%
66%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
73%
9%
18%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #3 (Module #1)10 Teachers
10%
40%
50%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
70%
10%
20%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #2 (Module #2)9 Teachers
12%
38%
50%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
74%
15%
11%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
Anchor Standard #2 (Module #1)19 Teachers
17%
23%60%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
70%
23%
7%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation
Anchor Standard #5 (Module #2)19 Teachers
25%
25%
50%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #3 (Module #1)18 Teachers
13%
6%
81%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None50%
22%
28%
Final Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation
Math Practice #2 (Module #2)18 Teachers
22%
5%
73%
Baseline Walkthroughs
Two or More
One
None
Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors
Teacher Proficient in One Look For
Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
YOUR LOGO
Sustainability Planning
YOUR LOGO
Scope of Work Transfer Process
Modeling
CO-OWNERSHIP
Transfer
Key Objective: Sustainability
Common Core Aligned
Professional Development
Common Formative and
Summative Assessments
Digital Intervention
Implementation
Literacy Across the Curriculum (Tri-School Initiative)
Teacher Leader
Development
Administrator Development
YOUR LOGO
Sustainability Timeline: A Modular Approach
Module 1 Director Models Scope Implementation September 24th
Module 2 Director and Teacher Leader Co-Lead/Develop November 19th
Module 3 Teacher Leader leads, Director Supports and Collaborates February 4th
Module 4 Teacher Leaders leads, Director Provides Feedback April 8th
Transformational Scope of Work Transfer Process:
YOUR LOGO
A Closer Look: Professional Development
M1 •Director develops the presentation with Teacher Leader feedback.•Director presents majority, Teacher Leader presents minority.
M2 •Director and Teacher Leader co-develop the outline and presentation.•Teacher Leader presents majority, Director presents the minority.
M3 •Teacher Leader develops the outline with Director feedback.•Teacher Leader leads the presentation of the Anchor Standard/ SMP.
M4 •Teacher Leader implements the entire standard independently, from outline to CPT presentation.
The key goal with this effort is to develop capacity for Professional Development Implementation.
YOUR LOGO
Sustainability Phase Out Customization:Because One Size DOES NOT Fit ALL
YOUR LOGO
Sustainability Phase Out Customization:Because One Size DOES NOT Fit ALL
Each Teacher Leader and Tri-School Math and ELA Department has a different trajectory
Therefore – each department and Teacher Leader has a differentiated support plan
YOUR LOGO
Teacher Leader Scope Transfer Update
Inte
rven
tions
Comm
on A
sses
smen
ts
STAR Tes
ting
Inst
ruct
ional
Round
s
RIDE D
ocum
enta
tion
Liter
acy
Acros
s th
e Cur
riculu
m
Profe
ssion
al Dev
elopm
ent
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0
3
0
3
0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
0 0
1 1
0 0
2
1
5
0
4
7
6
5 5
4
5
4
2
3
9 Teacher Leaders 3 ELA TLs 3 ELL TLs 3 Math TLs
YOUR LOGO
OTI Report: Lead Partner Strengths
JSEC +
ELP showed great responsiveness to school
requests
Teachers appreciated structured approach for developing Common
Assessments
YOUR LOGO
OTI Report: Lead Partner Opportunities
JSEC Δ
Request for more coaching in classrooms
Request for more planning time for CCSS implementation
YOUR LOGO
Customized Phase Out Approach (2015)
School Needs OTI Findings Custom ELP Phase
Out Plan
JSEC
ELP Phase Out: June 18th
Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP &
School
MPHS
ELP Phase Out: June 18th
Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP &
School
CHS
ELP Phase Out: January 30th
Modules Three & Four to be Led by School
YOUR LOGO
Request for
more
Coaching
ENHANCED Coaching Support
YOUR LOGO
Enhanced Coaching Program PURPOSE
Reinforce content area standards already trained last year and this year (i.e. content area maintenance)
Train and support teachers in their first year with the Tri-Schools
Bolster support with relevant ELL and SPED strategies
Enhance the sustainability of training already implemented
YOUR LOGO
Standards to be Maintenance Coached
Mathematics SMP #1 SMP #4 SMP #6
ELA/ELL Anchor Standard 1 Anchor Standard 2
Teachers will be coached one standard at a time to maximize focus and attention.
Coaching progress will be tracked and monitored via Look Fors.
YOUR LOGO
NEXT STEPS
PARCC testing will consume
technology, time, and manpower.
Lead Partner will support with
scheduling and other logistics.
Through SUSTAINABILITY, Teacher Leaders
now drive transformation.
YOUR LOGO
Text