21
PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) SUMMARY Program Name: Scope: Supplier Name: PSM Date: Supplier Manufacturing Location: Part Number, Revision Level & Date: DUN's #: Part Description: PSM Location: Inteva Representatives & Contact Information Supplier Representatives & Contact Information Name Position Phone Email address Name Position Phone Email address 1 Purchasing 1 Program Manager 2 Program Manager 2 Sales 3 Product Engineer 3 Engineering 4 Plant SQE / SQA 4 Plant Logistics 5 APQP 5 Plant Quality 6 Corp AQE / SDE 6 Other 7 PC&L 7 8 Other 8 9 9 10 10 Inteva Program Manager: Supplier Program Manager: PPAP Submission Date To Inteva: Inteva's Post PSM Decision: If decision is "Proceed - Issue PO" - all PSM action items still require full closure If decision is "Hold" - requirements to move forward must be identified below If decision is "Do Not Proceed" - reason(s) to be identified below and communicated to supplier and another option will Comments: # of Special Characteristics:

[XLS] · Web viewPPAP samples, for both dimensional and initial capability study, must be individually tagged and numbered by cavity Supplier:

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) SUMMARY

Program Name: Scope: Supplier Name:

PSM Date: Supplier Manufacturing Location:

Part Number, Revision Level & Date: DUN's #:

Part Description: # of Special Characteristics: PSM Location:

Inteva Representatives & Contact Information Supplier Representatives & Contact Information

Name Position Phone Email address Name Position Phone Email address

1 Purchasing 1 Program Manager

2 Program Manager 2 Sales

3 Product Engineer 3 Engineering

4 Plant SQE / SQA 4 Plant Logistics

5 APQP 5 Plant Quality

6 Corp AQE / SDE 6 Other

7 PC&L 7

8 Other 8

9 9

10 10

Inteva Program Manager:

Supplier Program Manager:

PPAP Submission Date To Inteva:

Inteva's Post PSM Decision:

If decision is "Proceed - Issue PO" - all PSM action items still require full closureIf decision is "Hold" - requirements to move forward must be identified belowIf decision is "Do Not Proceed" - reason(s) to be identified below and communicated to supplier and another option will be pursued

Comments:

I6
allenbt: enter city, state (or equivalent) and country
A8
allenbt: from drawing
A12
allenbt: ideally, PSM should be held at receiving Inteva plant
D28
Windows User: Type in the Inteva's Program Mgr name. Ensure Prog Mgr is on PSM email distribution list
D30
Windows User: Type in the Supplier's Program Mgr (or equivalent) name. Ensure name is on PSM email distribution list

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 1 - DESIGN & PRINT CONSIDERATIONS Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion Status1.1 A Technical Review meeting was completed? 1.2 Any open issues from the Technical Review that must be resolved now? 1.3 The supplier has all drawings and they are to the correct rev level?

1.4 Is this a new design?

1.5 Does supplier have any issues with drawing specifications?

1.6 Is drawing ownership clearly defined?

1.7 Are prototype samples required?

1.8 Are prototype requirements - quantity, quality and delivery understood?

1.9

1.11

1.12 Does supplier understand Inteva's "change request" submission process?

1.13

1.14 Any issues regarding datums or application of GD&T?

1.15

1.16

1.17

Other Review Items:1.18

1.19

Does the supplier understand how the part functions? How it is handled in manufacturing and assembly operations. Mating part considerations?

Are Special Characteristics (SC's) identified and does the supplier understand the fit / function of each?

Identification, traceability & Inteva's logo requirements on component (location, size, etc) defined?

Specifications: Does the supplier understand all OEM/National/International Standards/References mentioned on the drawing? Does supplier have access to these databases and a system in place to regularly update these requirements?

Any co-development required? If so, has a contract been finalized?

As required in the SRM, has a continuance conforming testing plan been identified and agreed to by Inteva Engineering and the supplier?

D7
allenbt: Yes
F7
allenbt: No
H7
allenbt: Not applicable
L7
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N7
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
P7
Windows User: from Status Key, select one: NA, Complete, Green, Yellow or Red
B10
allenbt: if there are unresolved issues that will have a significant negative impact on this process, that they be resolved now!!!
J22
Prototype Milestones & requirements to be written in this section
B28
allenbt: Suppliers on Plex (legacy Inteva) go thru Plex. Supplier's not on Plex (legacy ArvinMeritor) uses electronic file and change request should go thru Inteva plant SQA
B34
Check if any TL, DIN, etc…
B38
allenbt: 8.2.4.1 in SRM

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 2 - MATERIAL & PROCESS SPECIFICATION REVIEW Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion Status2.1 The following material and process specifications apply:

This should be filled out by Inteva prior to the PSM

2.2 Does the supplier have a copy of all specifications and take no exceptions?

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

2.10

2.11

2.12 Are coating requirements understood, including measurement method?

2.13

Other Review Items:2.14

2.15

As per the SRM, has the supplier and Inteva Product Engineering formalized a continuous conformance testing plan?

Hardness: full understanding of: area to be checked, hardness scale and any special fixture(s) required?

Soundness: full understanding of high vs. low soundness areas and standards required

Heat Treat: distortion after HT: will not be an issue?

Surface Finish: understand paint approval requirements?

Surface Finish: understand surface finish requirements for machined and "as-produced" surfaces as well as measurement methods?

Plating: understand requirements and measurement method?

Rubber & Plastic - understand material specification including : approved sources, max % regrind allowed (0% allowed if not specified on drawing), required temperature and humidity controls, etc?

When applicable, is supplier (and sub-supplier) compliant to CQI-9, 11, 12, 15 or 17? Have supplier provide copy of the "Cover Sheet" from the latest assessment (CQI requires annual assessments)

Does suppiler have a system in place to track part "product and process change" history?

D45
allenbt: Yes
F45
allenbt: No
H45
allenbt: Not applicable
L45
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N45
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
J48
Any other material or process than agreed to in the PSM need to be PPAP approved by Inteva before use.
B55
allenbt: 8.2.4.1 in SRM
B71
allenbt: 9: Heat Treat 11: Plating 12: Coating 15: Welding 17: Soldering Inteva does not need copy of sub-supplier's "Cover Sheet", but supplier must provide evidence of the sub-suppliers compliance
B75
allenbt: Make sure it meets the requirements of the receiving Inteva plant?

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 3 - TOOLING & CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion StatusTooling

3.1 Has the supplier received, and agreed to, the Inteva Tooling Manual ?

3.2 Is the Tool Cost Breakdown completed ?

3.3 Are Tools designed and constructed in-house or at external supplier ?

3.4

3.5

3.6

3.7 For the specific part, has a mould flow or blank/strip analysis been completed?

3.8

3.9

3.10 Has material shrinkage been considered in the tool design?

3.11 Is the feed position and / or material grain direction acceptable to Inteva?

3.12

3.13

3.14 Any secondary operations (burr removal, coining, etc) required ?

3.15 No issues regarding tool ownership/asset identification (Inteva's asset tag)?

3.16

This should be filled out by Supplier prior to the meeting

Please refer to "Tooling Requirements" worksheet located in this file

3.17 Minimum tooling life warranty (# pcs) = Define if tooling refurbishment in part / price, substituting tool in part / price?

Capacity Considerations - Full process work station to work station3.18 Constraint Operation =3.19 Cycle Time = 3.20 Parts / hour =3.21 Parts / shift =3.22 # shifts available =3.23 Daily theoretical capacity = 3.24 Daily nominal capacity =

3.25 Nominal capacity meets Inteva's requirements?

3.26

3.27

3.28

Other Tooling and Capacity Items:

3.29

3.30

Is tooling supplier known to Inteva (previous experience)? What is name and location of tooling supplier?

Is an audit of the toolmaker required (to be performed by Inteva Tooling Specialist)?

Tool designer / manufacturer has no issues with tolerances or material specified?

Has the mould flow or blank/strip analysis been reviewed by the Inteva Regional Tooling Specialist? Any issues?

If no analysis has been completed, has the gate position or blank/strip layout been agreed to with the Inteva Regional Tooling Specialist?

Has the supplier submitted tool concept showing feed, parting lines, miss-match and flatness meet print and process specification ?

Has tooling design been approved by Inteva Regional Tooling Specialist? NOTE: approval is mandatory before supplier can cut steel.

Full Tooling Description:

How will supplier's capacity be verified? (On-site review by Inteva or Run @ Rate reported on PSW)

If equipment and tooling is not dedicated, what impact does this have on available vs. required capacity?

Has the supplier reviewed and optimized its' process parameters? Does supplier need to perform IIPA (Inteva's Injection Process Audit)?

D82
allenbt: Yes
F82
allenbt: No
H82
allenbt: Not applicable
L82
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N82
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
J89
If not: Milestones to be submitted and agreed with Inteva; Responsible name & contact to be listed
J95
Mold flow for all plastic parts to determine best injection point. Blank/strip layout approval red for all stamped parts to determine strip stages.
J117
Provide tooling drawing:Inteva tooling specialist may require further information

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 4 - PURCHASING & MATERIALS CONSIDERATIONS Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion StatusPurchasing

4.1 The supplier has reviewed the Inteva's Terms & Conditions and has no issues?

4.2 The supplier agrees and understands payment term (tools and parts) ?

4.3 The supplier understands and agrees to the negotiated Incoterms?

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7 Have key Inteva program milestones been communicated to the supplier?

4.8 Agree upon exchange rate base?

Materials, Logistics & Packaging4.9 Is supplier EDI capable?

4.10 Can supplier send ASN's?

4.11 Does supplier understand Inteva's release system and forms?

4.12 Raw, fab and firm allowance defined?

4.13 What is the delivery frequency?

4.14 Are safety stock requirements agreed (minimum, maximum, consignment)?

4.15 Are raw material and sub-supplier lead times understood?

Complete Description of Proposed Supply Chain:4.16

This should be filled out by Supplier prior to the meeting

4.17 Does the supplier's shipping label meet the Inteva plant requirements?

4.18

4.19 Is packaging is included in piece price?

4.20 Supplier has provided a detailed packaging and transportation cost break down?

4.21 Rust prevention requirements understood? MOVE TO 4.15 OR SECTION 2?

Other Purchasing, Materials, Logistics and Packaging Items:4.22

4.23

Supplier has responded to RFQ with no commercial exceptions and has provided a detailed Inteva Part & Tooling cost breakdown?

Supplier understands and agrees with Inteva's cost reduction requirements?

Can supplier provide a preliminary program timing plan that meets Inteva's requirements?

Are packaging requirements understood (container type, size, quantities, etc.) and does packaging minimize risk of damage to parts?

D148
allenbt: Yes
F148
allenbt: No
H148
allenbt: Not applicable
L148
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N148
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
B159
allenbt: Direction to come from Inteva Buyer
B174
material raw needed to fabricate to accomplish the firm deliveries (from deliveries decline to buy-off from supplier)
B189
allenbt: for suppliers using Plex, the requirements are on Plex. For suppliers not using Plex, the Inteva plant needs to provide the requirement.

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 5 - PPAP Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion Status5.1 The required PPAP submission level has been communicated to supplier?

5.2 Has the supplier's PPAP contact person been identified?

5.3 Has the Inteva PPAP contact person been identified?

PPAP Checklist

5.4 1) reviewed the PPAP checklist with the supplier's PPAP contact person?

5.5

5.6

5.7

5.8

5.9 Are the number of samples required for engineering test identified?

Summary of Engineering tests to be conducted:

5.10This should be filled out by Inteva prior to the meeting

5.11

5.12

5.13

5.14

5.15

5.16

5.17 Has supplier submited a list of metrology equipment to Inteva's Quality Dept?

5.18

5.19

Other PPAP Items:

5.20

5.21

Has the responsible Inteva PPAP contact person:

2) informed the supplier as to how the PPAP is to be submitted (email, hard copy, both, etc.)?

If multiple Inteva plants are involved in the PPAP process, has Inteva provided the supplier with the proper PPAP requirements and instructions?

A complete understanding of PPAP submission requirements must be achieved!!

Does the supplier know the print dimension that corresponds to each Special Characteristic?

Does the supplier understand how each Special Characteristic is to be measured? Capability study required: Ppk: 30 measurements (per cavity) & Cpk: 125 measurements (per cavity)

Are specially designed gages needed? Will Inteva gages be duplicated? Will supplier gages be duplicated? Does Inteva need to provide prints of special gages ? CMM programs?

Total of samples to be submitted for line trial per cavity: identify in measurement report with the appropriate CC/SC symbol

PPAP samples, for both dimensional and initial capability study, must be individually tagged and numbered by cavity

Are initial process capabilty (Ppk/Cpk) requirements for PPAP, as identified in the SRM, understood by supplier?

IMDS/MSDS requirements understood by supplier? ID parent code (75559 or 13110) to use depends on which Inteva plant is being supplied

Did the supplier develop a formal Early Production Containment (EPC) plan as required in the SRM?

When applicable, has the supplier developed & implemented an EPC plan, as required in fhe SRM?

When applicable, supplier agrees to submit the completed CQI-9, 11, 12, 15 or 17 "Cover Sheet" from the annual assessment (that is required by the supplier) to the Inteva plant quality dept?

Does supplier understand the PPAP Resubmission Criteria requirements per the latest edition of the AIAG PPAP manual?

PRIOR to implementing a change, it is the supplier's responsibility to contact the Inteva plant quality contact and agree to PPAP level submission required + PPAP Release before starting deliveries

D204
allenbt: Yes
F204
allenbt: No
H204
allenbt: Not applicable
L204
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N204
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
B206
allenbt: default is Level 3 as per 7.3.6.3 in SRM
J206
allenbt: Identify PPAP submission level
J208
allenbt: enter the name of the supplier's contact who is responsible for the PPAP submission
J210
allenbt: enter the name of the Inteva PPAP contact person
B215
allenbt: the supplier's PPAP contact person should have a complete understanding of Inteva's supplier PPAP checklist
B223
allenbt: want to ensure the supplier does not misinterpret the drawing requirements (GD&T) associated with the SC's
B225
allenbt: any deviation should come from plant quality department of Inteva receiving site
B241
allenbt: 7.2.2.1 in SRM
B243
allenbt: use 75559 for legacy Inteva plants Use 13110 for legacy ArvinMeritor plants
B245
allenbt: 8.2.2.3 in SRM
B251
allenbt: 9: Heat Treat 11: Plating 12: Coating 15: Welding 17: Soldering

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 6 - QUALITY Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion Status6.1 Has the "Supplier Team Feasibility Commitment" process been completed?

6.2

6.3 Are warranty obligations understood ?

6.4

6.5 Is supplier certified to ISO 14001?

6.6

6.7

6.8 If a "current" supplier, are there any quality, delivery, etc., concerns?

6.9

6.10

6.11

6.12

6.13

6.14 What is supplier's planned method to gather capability data?

6.15

6.16 Supplier knows who the end user, OEM is?

6.17

6.18

6.19 Does supplier have liability insurance?

6.20

Other Quality Items:

6.21

6.22

Are there any open issues from the "Supplier Team Feasiblity Commitment" process that must be resolved now?

As identified in the SRM, does supplier meet Inteva's quality system certification requirement: at a minimum, certified to latest edition of ISO9001 with a plan in place to become compliant to latest edition of ISO/TS 16949?)

As identified in the SRM, supplier understands that they are completely responsible for sub-supplier quality. Specific responsibilities must be agreed upon for any exceptions (consigned material, etc).

Does the supplier have experience/knowledge of quality issues on similar products? What was the supplier's action plan ?

To support Inteva with respect to timing/quality of the Launch/SOP, does supplier agree to provide on-site support (such as a resident engineer) at Inteva?

Is Inteva's problem notification process (Defective Material Notice or Problem Case) and requirements, as identified in the SRM (unless otherwise specified by Inteva Problem Owner), understood by supplier?- 24 hours for initial response (containment actions)- 15 days for complete 8D report - 8D report must include a 5 Why analysis for root cause identification

Are cost of non-quality charges for DMN's and PC's, as identified in the SRM, understood by supplier?

Are record retention requirements, as identified in the SRM, understood by supplier?

Are long term capability (Cpk) requirements for SC's, as identified in the SRM, understood by supplier?

As identified in the SRM, does the supplier understand that an approved deviation for any out-of-specification characteristic, must be obtained prior to PPAP submission or serial delivery ?

As identified in the SRM, the supplier understands the end user, OEM's Customer Specific Requirements?

As required in the SRM, does supplier follow the requirements of the latest edition of the AIAG reference manuals: PPAP, APQP & Control Plan, FMEA, MSA and SPC?

After first trial parts and prior to final tool grooming, supplier agrees to send CMM operator to visit lead Inteva plant to agree to measurement methodologies. Measurement system instructions to be included in PPAP package

D262
allenbt: Yes
F262
allenbt: No
H262
allenbt: Not applicable
L262
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N262
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
B264
allenbt: Purchasing needs to bring latest STFC to the PSM. If STFC was not previously completed, it MUST be completed now!! STFC includes a question to supplier regarding their agreement of Inteva's SRM.
B266
allenbt: intent is that if there are unresolved issues that will have a significant negative impact on this process, that they be resolved now!!!
B270
allenbt: 7.4.1 in SRM. Obtain necessary evidence from supplier.
B272
allenbt: 14001 is not mandatory, just highly recommended
B274
allenbt: 7.4.3.1 in SRM
B276
allenbt: intent is for Inteva and the supplier to identify fixes as soon as possible
B282
allenbt: 8.5.2 in SRM
B284
allenbt: 8.5.2 in SRM
B288
allenbt: 7.2.1.1 in SRM
B292
allenbt: 7.1.4 in SRM
B294
allenbt: 7.2.1 in SRM
B296
allenbt: 7.2.1 in SRM
B298
allenbt: section 2 in SRM

PRE-SOURCING MEETING (PSM) CHECKLISTSupplier: 0 PSM Date:

SECTION 7 - MISCELLANEOUS Y N NA Comments / Follow-up Actions Due Date Champion Status7.1

7.2 As required in the SRM, is supplier compliant to SA8000?

7.3

7.4

7.5

7.6

7.7

7.8

7.9

If required, was a Supplier Capability Assessment (SCA) performed and was the supplier identified as approved or approved for development?

Supplier is aware of Inteva's compliancy requirements per the EU regulatory standards: REACH, RoHS and ELV Directive 2000/53/EC? (NOTE: applies to suppliers shipping product/materials to Inteva plants based in the EU).

If the supplier currently suppliers product/materials to the EU, is the supplier compliant to the regulatory standards referenced in 7.3?

As required in the SRM, does the supplier understand that if the supplier suspects a safety non-conformance in their product, the supplier will immediatetly contact their Inteva Buyer?

As identified in the SRM, if required, is the supplier compliant to the ISO / IEC 15504 (Automotive SPICE) standard?

IDENTIFY BELOW, ANY ISSUES NOT ADDRESSED IN THE PSM THAT MUST BE ADDRESSED BEFORE A PO COULD BE ISSUED

D310
allenbt: Yes
F310
allenbt: No
H310
allenbt: Not applicable
L310
allenbt: the date in which the action item is scheduled to be completed
N310
allenbt: the person responsible for ensuring the actions are completed by the target date
B312
allenbt: Inteva AQE / SDE to provide RA update status. If RA was required but has not been completed, it must be completed ASAP!!
B314
allenbt: Inteva Purchasing should have signed off compliance document from supplier
B316
allenbt: No evidence gathering required. As part of the supplier PPAP submission process, information will be entered by supplier and evaluated by Inteva
B320
allenbt: 7.2.1 in SRM. SPICE compliancy is required for suppliers and sub-suppliers which develop and supply electronic and software systems. Leve 3 is Inteva's default requirement
B322
allenbt: 7.2.1 in SRM. SPICE compliancy is required for suppliers and sub-suppliers which develop and supply electronic and software systems. Level 3 is Inteva's default requirement

Tooling Information Requirement (Per Tool)Component Tool Information:

Buyer: Purchasing Program Name: 0

Inteva Lead Plant: Inteva Program Manager:

Product Type or Description:

Product Part / Component Number: Desired Completion Date:

Engineering Drawing Level: Customer PPAP Date:

Tool Information:

Is the tool new or modified? If modified: what is stock quantity before modification?

Full Tool description below:

example: 4 cavity injection mould tool with hot runner feed

Quantity of tools: Quantities of Cavities: Tool Type:

Identification (from Tooling Manual Section 2)

Inteva Products ID Number: Customer ID Number (if any):

Minimum requiremen Customer: Component Name: Customer component No.

Closed Height: Ejection Stroke: Tool No:

Open Closed

Tool Location:

Company Name:

Street:

City: Zip code: Country:

Key Contact (s) Name Email Phone Mobile

contact 1:

Contact 2:

Contact 3:

Tool picture: - JPG format, max. 500 KB ( no PowerPoint, no PDF etc.! ) - ownership tag to be visible in pictures

B81
Windows User: Location of supplier where the tool will be used in production

Tool Maker:

Company Name:

Street:

City: Zip code: Country:

Key Contact (s) Name Email Phone Mobile

contact 1:

Contact 2:

Contact 3:

* On receipt of PPAP approval, the supplier is to send a copy of the latest updated tool drawings, on CD, to the respective Inteva Products Tooling Specialist.

Any doubt do not hesitate to check the "Inteva Products TOOLING MANUAL" to be provided by Buyer

B97
Window User: Name and address of company that made the tool

ACRONYM DESCRIPTIONAIAG: Automotive Industry Action Group

APQP : Advanced Product Quality PlanningASN : Advanced Shipping Notice

Cpk:

CMM: Coordinate Measuring MachineCQI: Continuous Quality Improvement (through AIAG)

DMN:

DUNS #: Dun & Bradstreet EDI : Electronic Data InterchangeELV: End of Live Vehicle Directive 2000/53/EC (EU only)

FMEA : Failure Mode Effect and AnalysisGD&T: Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing

IIPA: "Inteva Injection Process Audit". Conducted at supplier locations on an "as needed" basis

IMDS:

ISO 14001: Specifies the actual requirements for an environmental management systemMSA: Measurement Systems Analysis

MSDS:

OEM: Original Equipment ManufacturerPC&L Inteva's "Production Control and Logistics" function

PPAP: Production Part Approval Process (through AIAG)Ppk:

PSM: Inteva's "Pre-Sourcing Meeting"PSW: Part Submission Warrant

PC:

REACH: Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (EU only)RFQ: Request For Quote

ROsH:

SA8000: Social Accountability international standardSCA: Inteva's "Supplier Capability Assessment".SPC: Statistical Process Control

SPICE:

SRM: Inteva's "Supplier Requirements Manual"STFC: Inteva's "Supplier Team Feasibilty Commitment". Submitted by supplier at time of quote.

The capability index for a stable process. It is an indicator of process capabiliity based on process variation within each subgroup of a set of data

Inteva's "Defective Material Notice". A non-conforming notice issued to a supplier who is not using the the Inteva supplier portal Plex

International Material Data System: a collective, computer-based material data system used primarily by automotive OEMs to manage environmentally relevant aspects of the different parts used in vehicles

Material Safety Data Sheet: describes in detail the hazards and safety precautions associated with chemicals

The performance index. It is an indicator or process performance based on process variation throughout the full set of data

Inteva's "Problem Case": A non-conforming notice issued to a supplier who is using the the Inteva supplier portal Plex

Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EU only)

Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. International standard for software process assessment

LOCATION

http://www.aiag.org

http://www.aiag.org/staticcontent/education/index.cfm?section=training&mtype=clss

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2000L0053:20050701:EN:PDF

http://www.mdsystem.comhttp://www.iso14000-iso14001-environmental-management.com/

http://echa.europa.eu/

http://www.rohs.gov.uk/http://www.sa-intl.org

http://automotivespice.com

Revision History Change

August '10

PAM Overview

PAM Checklist

SQSR Concurrence TemplateTooling RequirementsAppendix Logistics tableAcronym List

October 4th, 2010 Document HistoryAllSQSR Concurrence TemplateSQSR Concurrence Template

PAM ChecklistJanuary 10th, 2011 PAM Checklist

January 31st, 2011 All file

July 5, 2011 All file

Prepared

Brian T. AllenSupplier Development Manager, Americas

Revision 0

Pre-Award_Meeting_September (tooling details).xls

September 21st, 2010

Revision 1

Revision 2November 11th,

2010Revision 3

Revision 4Revision 5

Revision 6

July 29, 2011

Printed copies and stored documents only for reference

What WhereCreation

D40

2.13

3.13

noneadded Septembernonenonechecked updateChange Body Systems reference to Inteva Products allRemoved link storage "SQSR" F3

L152Added GTS 00833 reference B87Cells size can be modified to increase text capacity.

all

all

Approved

Drumm MitchellDirector of Supplier Quality

Change: * PDF copy to be stored in the Amsterdam Hard Drive "Z:Procurement Public\Customer Projects\...." instead of providing copy to SuzanneChange: - will be automatically shared with : - will be available upon request withChange: - Has tooling design been approved by Inteva Products Regional Tooling Specialist?With: - Has tooling design been approved by Inteva Products Regional Tooling Specialist? NOTE: approval is mandatory before supplier can cut steel.

Spreadsheet

Replaced section 2.30 Supplier Scorecard with SA8000 requirements

A-B 30

Inteva Products Tooling Manual PDF removed as not Inteva Products version

revised cell protection to permit adding columns, cells, resize, format, etc.Changed process name to from Pre-Award Meeting to Pre-Sourcing Meeting (took out all references to Pre-Award Meeting). Removed SQSR Concurrence Template worksheet (did not replace as this is covered in the "Inteva Supplier Team Feasibility Commitment" process). Removed "Appendix Logistics Table" (not applicable). Made numerous changes to existing questions, deleted and added questions. Updated Acronyms worksheet

Signature on File

July 29, 2011

Why

Each one to maintain files

rewording to permit same understanding

Reflects VW requirement

--

- updating requirements regarding plastic processing - increased in order to extend explanations. - not enough space for comments.

rewording as not implies supplier to forward but to submit under requirement

Changes required due to Inteva Purchase of ArvinMeritor Body Systems with the PSM representing a common, standardized process for Inteva