Upload
gavin-hawkins
View
221
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy at SESAME
“BASEMA Status”
Messaoud Harfouche
Synchrotron-light for Experimental Science and Applications in the Middle
East
2
Answers to Previous Questions and suggestions
• What is the vision for BASEMA BL– Focus on the XAFS techniques (XANES, EXAFS, XRF, XRD)– Need to meet user demands– Beamline scientist can propose different techniques that can be
combined with XAS• RAMAN is the widely used technique and maybe the cheapest • XES, HERFD, RIXS are the most advanced techniques but very expensive and
needs special design (can’t buy as a complete system)– Need multitude of bent crystals (larger is the number better are the results)– Need different type of crystals to cover all the energy regions
– Priority should be given to build a strong XAS user community• Need to connect with universities in the region (not that easy)
– SESAME should offer joint positions with universities (home universities ) to beamline scientists
– Sign MoUs with universities and research institutions– ……..
• Need to encourage scientists to develop their own research and allow collaborations among the members and other countries.
3
• Modify the DCM to use MCM & Easy exchange by users– The DCM doesn’t allow motorized crystal exchange lots of time to
change the crystals need mechanical & vacuum technicians– Gain in flux but loss in resolution can’t be used for most of EXAFS
measurements– Flux on the sample is good enough even at higher energies - ~30
keV- if good detectors are used.– Cost of such a modification is very high (according to Ricardo Seniorato
Bruker ‘former Accel’)
Answers to Previous Questions and suggestions
4
• A future upgrade of beamline to use KB focusing system to achieve 3x3 mm2
– Ray tracing calculations already performed– Beam size from the source is too large difficult to focus– Smallest beam size that can be achieved is 8 x 10 mm2 with a flux of 5
x 109 ph/sec at 8 keV– The option of short beamline is excluded
• need a small intermediate source point with small demagnification
– Smaller is the beam size - lower is the flux on the sample– Project for a micro-focusing beamline on insertion device (Undulator)
can be proposed for phase II beamlines (to be proposed by potential users)
Answers to Previous Questions and suggestions
5
• What makes a good beamline? Stability and Low noise are key factors!– Beamline scientist totally agree on this proposition – It is a practical matter rather than calculations and design issue
• Need to minimize the number of motorization and disconnect the non used ones.
• Find a system that allows to disconnect a motor remotely and make it passive as soon as it is not used.
• Find the adequate solution for internal and external cooling system. • Use insolating material between the ground and girders for the optics
components• Other tricks can be collected from experts – starting from SAC/BAC
Answers to Previous Questions and suggestions
6
• Being competitive by having reliable and impressive software – data acquisition and control software
• A sketch (Mock-up) of the data acquisition software is already done • See the demonstration version • Will be discussed with control group• Need a very good physicist who is a good programmer or a very good
programmer and good in physics.
– Data reduction and analysis • Many software are developed
– Ifeffit , WInXAS, XAFS, EXAFS pour le mac, PyMCA, fit2D, Match, etc.– Some have active mailing list and provide help for the users.
• Users are free to use there own software
Answers to Previous Questions and suggestions
7
Other Comments
• Opening of the boxes from ESRF– On going (with many delays)
• Monochromator has been opened and inspected in presence of an expert (A. Simionovici)– Visual inspection (internal, external)– Testing of stepper motors, cooling and vacuum system– Could not test all the motors and signals (No control hardware)
• Other beamline components are in testing phase – XBPM, Slits, Wire monitor
• The opening of the VCM mirror is delayed until receiving the second mirror VFM– Metrology tests are already done at ESRF (thanks to Amparo Vivo)– Need an expert who worked with ZEISS mirror mechanisms (Eric Detonna, ESRF)
8
Other Comments
• Budget estimation of the control system– Discussed with 3 beamline scientists from SOLEIL
• SAMBA, DiFabs, ODE
– The average construction budget for a beamline at SOLEIL was given by the control group (Pascale Betinelli + Yves-Marie Abevin)
– Will be shown in details at the end of this presentation
• Annual upgrade budget– Not needed at this stage of the construction
9
Raman technique will be a good technique to be combined
with XAFS, XRF and XRD
Need for a cryojet or cryostat for biological and some
environmental samples. Needs for users will be submitted as proposal through EUC or directly to BL
scientist
Should focus more on building the users community which
leads to scientific collaborations between users
A large beam is needed for bulk measurements and 10x10 mm2
is a good beam size for many applications.
Users recommendations and wishes
10
BASEMA
11
Current Status of BASEMA
CDR has been written and ready to be reviewed TDR has been started
3D drawing of all the components is ongoing (Akrum) Inspecting, testing and documenting the optics
components Research vision for the beamline (preparing students,
collaborations)
12
BASEMA
13
BASEMA Port D08
Booster
Storage ring
Beamline
by Adel Amro
14
Machine:
1011
1012
1013
1014
1 10 100
SESAME (400 mA)
SLS (400 mA)
SOLEIL (400 mA)
ESRF (100mA)
Flu
x [P
hot
ons/
sec/
0.1%
bw
]
Photon Energy [keV]
Can’t go to higher Energies due to the machine performances
15
Beamline Characteristics
1011
1012
1013
1014
1 10 100
SESAME (400 mA)
SLS (400 mA)
SOLEIL (400 mA)
ESRF (100mA)
Flu
x [P
hot
ons/
sec/
0.1%
bw
]
Photon Energy [keV]
Parameter Unit ValueSource (BM) T 1.45
Hor. acceptance mrad 3
Vert. acceptance mrad 0.6
Energy range keV 4 – 30
Energy resolution - ~ 10-4
Photon flux (S1) Ph/sec 2x1012 (8keV)
Beam size (S1) mm2 ~0.1 x 0.1
Beam size (S2) mm2 8x10
Photon flux (S1) Ph/sec 5x109 (8keV)
Lower limit due to absorption of air in the EH Higher limit due to machine limitation
Energy range
16
Spectral energy range (~4 –30 keV)
It will be hard to probe some elements at very lower concentrations
: K- edge: L- edge
: Difficult
17
Control racksOptics Hutch
Control room Experimenta
l Hutch
Optics Hutch
Control room Experimenta
l HutchControl racks
Lab.
Beamline Hutches
NEW
OLD
18
Control racksOptics Hutch
Control room Experimental
Hutch
Hutches & Optics Layout
19
Beamline Optics
VCM VFM
Still at ESRF: to be delivered with BM16 comp.
Arrived at SESAME:will be opened once VCM arrived
20
Beamline Optics
13 points evenly spaced by 50.8mm are measured on each strip
Surface Roughness
21
Averaged rms valuesVCM
VFM
Beamline Optics
22
Beamline Optics
Micro-roughness RMS distribution on VCM stripes
Pt Si
23
Micro-roughness RMS distribution on VFM stripes
Pt Si
Beamline Optics
24
LTP measurement VCM (Slope error)
Pt
Si
Beamline Optics
bender performances were not checked
Slope errors correspond to residuals to the best cylinder Three parallel traces spaced by 15 mm are measured on each stripe
25
LTP measurement VFM (Slope error)
Pt
Si
Beamline Optics
bender performances were not checked
Slope errors correspond to residuals to the best cylinder Three parallel traces spaced by 15 mm are measured on each stripe
26
Element Transmitted Power (W)
AbsorbedPower(W)
Abs. PowerDens.(W/mm²)
Prim slits 108.8 - -
Be 250 µm 78.1 30.7 0.17
M1 mirror 33.6 26.0 0.0009
1rst crystal (23°) 0.003 33.6 0.11
Element Transmitted Power (W)
AbsorbedPower(W)
Abs. PowerDens.(W/mm²)
Prim slits 108.8 - -
Be 250 µm 78.1 30.7 0.17
M1 mirror 51.9 7.6 0.00026
1rst crystal (23°) 0.003 51.9 0.18
Heat load absorption and power density on VCM
Si
Pt
27
Without cooling With cooling
Beamline Optics
Thermoelastic calculations (FE)
Power density calculated on the surface of the Si coated
stripe of the VCM
28
Beamline Optics
DCM
ROBL DCM at ESRF Arrived to SESAME Opened in presence of an expert (A. Simionovici)
Discussions and decisions: Use the current set up of cooling system for whole period of commissioning
Mount the bender for the second crystal once we have beam through optics to experimental hutch
29
Stepper motors
Beamline Optics
Tests on the DCM
30
Beamline Optics
Tests on the DCM
Cooling System
31
Beamline Optics
Tests on the DCM
Cooling System
32
Beamline Optics
Tests on the DCM
Vacuum System
33
Beamline OpticsProblems encountered
Vertical motors can’t be mounted (need to be fixed on the floor)
Some Controllers still at ESRF for pico- and servo-motors
No controller at SESAME
Drops were observed on the first crystal
Contacted optics groups at ESRF, APS
Need to find a way to clean them
34
Beamline Optics
Other Components All the components from ESRF were unpacked Except the VCM Test is ongoing for the motors and motor controllers Cooling and vacuum will follow soon
Tested components will be covered and stored in the Lab. Primary alignment of the components will be done at the end
35
E (keV) Mirror angle(mrad)
N (ph/s)
E (eV)
Size( HV mm)
Div.(HV mrad)
3rd order
5 (a) 3.2 mrad 2.41012 0.63 0.550.25 2.910.28 3.1107 (1.3X10-5)
5 2.8 mrad 2.21012 0.64 0.550.24 2.920.25 1.3108 (6.0X10-5)8 2.8 mrad 2.81012 1.07 0.560.25 2.910.25 2.5105(8.9X10-8)12 2.2 mrad 1.81012 1.83 0.550.24 2.910.20 6.0103(3.3X10-9)
E (keV) Mirror angle(mrad)
N (ph/s)
DE (eV)
Size(HV mm)
Div.(HV mrad)
3rd order
14 2.8 2.41011 0.92 0.540.24 2.910.25 2.7104 (1.1X10-7)
18 2.8 1.41011 1.49 0.540.23 2.850.24 -
24 2.8 4.51010 2.66 0.540.25 2.700.24 -
30 2.2 1.71010 4.22 0.560.25 2.500.19 -
Optical properties at the sample positionSi(111) crystal
Si(311) crystal
36
Optical properties at the sample position
Number of photons on the sample (S1)
without focusing system (KB)
37
Sec. slits N (ph/s) DE (eV) Size (µm HV) Div (mrad HV)
Fully open1.41012 1.06 54 x 23 2.231.18
10050 µm 4.9109 1.04 7.5x9.7 2.101.12
Optical Element
Distance (m)
Demagn.
S1 – VFM (P) 2.92
VFM – S2 (q) 0.58 1/10
S1– HFM (p) 3.18 1/6
HFM – S2 (q) 0.32
KB parameters from secondary source
KB Focusing system
Ray tracing simulation results
38
KB Focusing systemSecondary source (S1 sample) Focused beam (S2 sample)
8x10 mm2
~5x109 Ph/sec
39
Materials Costs (M$)Interface (hutches and infrastructure) 0.50Front End 0.15Beamline Optics 0.49 o XBPM 0.10o Crystals for DCM 0.04o Modifications on the existing optics 0.10 (if needed)o Focusing system (KB+microscope) 0.25 (To be discussed)
Vacuum System 0.03
Computing and Control System 0.40Hardware (PCs, VME, drivers,…) 0.3Software and DAQ 0.1Furniture End Station 0.51Tables (2) 0.12Detectorso ICs, diodes and gas mixing system 0.04o SDD (1) 0.05o Multi-element Ge detector 0.30 (promises for 7e Ge detector S.H.)
Total costs with focusing system 2.08Total costs without focusing system (-0.25) 1.83
Estimated Costs
40
Task Start End
Conceptual Design Report (CDR) 2011 November, 2012
Technical Design Report Design Report Final Design Report
December, 2012July, 2013
Jun, 2013November, 2014
Lead procurement December, 2014 May, 2015
Components modifications and procurement January, 2015 September, 2015
Installation May, 2015 October, 2015
Control Integrating and testing Jun, 2015 December, 2015
Commissioning (depending on machine) January 2016 July, 2016
Proposals for expert users April, 2016 -
Accepting Expert Users July, 2016 October, 2016
Proposals for beamtime (all users) September 15, 2016 -
Users at bemlline January, 2017 -
Estimated Time Schedule
41
Other ActivitiesIAEA Coordinated Research Project (2 proposals)
Adsorption and mobility of heavy metals in soils in the vicinity of Jordanian- and Yarmouk- rivers (SESAME project)
Antimony as an element with environmental concern and its pollution in Mongolia collaboration project between SESAME, Jordan and The Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Mongolia
Accepted proposal for joint SESAME/ICTP School Advanced School on Synchrotron Techniques in Environmental Scientific projects
SESAME-ICTP
Co-supervising a Master Student from Al-Quds University Upgrade of BASEMA “the XAFS/XRF Beamline at SESAME” and application to a scientific
case
Co-supervising a Master Student from Jordanian Uniersity Heavy metals in the vicinity of Jordanian and Yermok rivers soils
42
Acknowledgement Andreas Scheinost (ROBL, ESRF) Amparo Vivo (metrology Lab., ESRF) Alexander Simionovici (Univ. Josef Fourier and ESRF)Thiery Moreno (SOLEIL, France)
A. Amro, T. Abu Hanieh,Y. Moumani, F. Al-Omari, A. Attyeh,
SESAME StaffM. Shehab M. Al-Najdawi, S. Budair, O. Noor, M. Al-khalilietc.