83
WS – Security Policy Prabath Siriwardena Director, Security Architecture

WS – Security Policy

  • Upload
    elysia

  • View
    62

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

WS – Security Policy. Prabath Siriwardena Director, Security Architecture. Why we need a policy ?. How come users get to know the security requirements of your web service? Web service may need client to authenticate Web service may need client to sign all his requests - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: WS – Security Policy

WS – Security Policy

Prabath SiriwardenaDirector, Security Architecture

Page 2: WS – Security Policy

Why we need a policy ?

• How come users get to know the security requirements of your web service?

• Web service may need client to authenticate• Web service may need client to sign all his requests• Client may need some part of the response from the

service to be encrypted• Client need the service to sign the entire response

first and then encrypts

Page 3: WS – Security Policy

WS-Policy

• General framework for endpoints to express requirements.

• NOT just for security requirements• Requirements are expressed in terms of a ‘Policy’• WS-Policy is a set of specifications providing a

generalized mechanism for describing policy in a machine readable way.

Page 4: WS – Security Policy

WS-Policy & WSDL

• WSDL focuses on function descriptions• Non-functional descriptions and QoS aspects are

covered by WS-Policy• Web services clients do not have a WSDL, yet WS-

Policy also applies to web services clients

Page 5: WS – Security Policy

WS-Policy Framework

• WS-Policy, defines a framework for describing policy assertions.

• WS-PolicyAttachment, describes how policies are attached to resource [e.g. WSDL]

• WS-PolicyAssertions, describes a common set of assertions that are applicable across different domains.

Page 6: WS – Security Policy

WS-Policy

• Basic operatorswsp:Allwsp:ExactlyOne

Page 7: WS – Security Policy

WS-Policy -Example<wsp:Policy> <wsp:ExactlyOne> <wsp:All> <A/> <B/> </wsp:All> <wsp:All> <A/> <C/> </wsp:All> </wsp:ExactlyOne></wsp:Policy>

Page 8: WS – Security Policy

• <wsp:All> and <wsp:ExactlyOne> are commutative• <wsp:All> and <wsp:ExactlyOne> are associative• <wsp:All> and <wsp:ExactlyOne> are idempotent• <wsp:All> and <wsp:ExactlyOne> are distributive

WS-Policy

Page 9: WS – Security Policy

WS-SecurityPolicy• Based on WS-Policy• Various groups of policy assertions• Expressed in WSDL• Defines six policy assertions that apply to WS-Security• To express security requirements of a Web service according

to the WS-Policy spec– What needs to be protected– What tokens to use– Algorithms, reference types, etc..

Page 10: WS – Security Policy

Assertion Types

• Protection assertions• Required Elements Assertion• Token assertions• Security Binding assertions• Supporting token assertions• Protocol assertions

Page 11: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertions

• Specify what needs to be protected– Integrity Assertions– Confidentiality Assertions

Page 12: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertions - Integrity

SignedPartsThis assertion specifies the parts of the message that need integrity protection.

<sp:SignedParts ... > <sp:Body /> <sp:Header Name="" Namespace=""/> </sp:SignedParts>

Page 13: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertions - Integrity

SignedElementsThis assertion is used to specify arbitrary elements in the message that require integrity protection.

<sp:SignedElements XPathVersion="“ > <sp:XPath>xs:string</sp:XPath>

</sp:SignedElements>

Page 14: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertions - Confidentiality

EncryptedPartsThis assertion specifies the parts of the message that need confidentiality protection. .

<sp:EncryptedParts ... > <sp:Body /> <sp:Header Name="" Namespace=""/> </sp:EncryptedParts >

Page 15: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertions - Confidentiality

EncryptedElementsThis assertion is used to specify arbitrary elements in the message that require confidentiality protection.

<sp:EncryptedElements XPathVersion="“ > <sp:XPath>xs:string</sp:XPath>

</ sp:EncryptedElements >

Page 16: WS – Security Policy

Protection Assertion Example<sp:SignedParts xmlns:sp="http://...securitypolicy"> <sp:Body/> <sp:Header Name="To"

Namespace="http://.../ws/2004/08/addressing"/> <sp:Header Name="From"

Namespace="http://.../ws/2004/08/addressing"/></sp:SignedParts>

<sp:EncryptedParts xmlns:sp="http://...securitypolicy"> <sp:Body/></sp:EncryptedParts>

Page 17: WS – Security Policy

Required Elements Assertion

• This assertion is used to specify header elements that the message MUST contain.

<sp:RequiredElements XPathVersion="”> <sp:XPath>…</sp:XPath> </sp:RequiredElements>

Page 18: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions

• Token assertions specify the type of tokens to use to protect or bind tokens and claims to the message. – UsernameToken– X. 509– IssuedToken

Page 19: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions - UsernameToken

• This element represents a requirement to include a UsernameToken

<sp:UsernameToken sp:IncludeToken=“”> <wsp:Policy> <sp:WssUsernameToken11 ... /> </wsp:Policy></sp:UsernameToken>

Page 20: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions - IssuedToken• This element represents a requirement for an issued

token, that is one issued by some token issuer.

<sp:IssuedToken sp:IncludeToken=“”> <sp:Issuer>..</sp:Issuer> <sp:RequestSecurityTokenTemplate

TrustVersion="" > </sp:RequestSecurityTokenTemplate> <wsp:Policy> </wsp:Policy>

</sp:IssuedToken>

Page 21: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions - IssuedToken• This element represents a requirement for an issued

token, that is one issued by some token issuer.

Page 22: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions – X.509

This element represents a requirement for a binary security token carrying an X509 token.

Page 23: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions – X.509<sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken="">

<wsp:Policy> <sp:RequireKeyIdentifierReference /> <sp:RequireIssuerSerialReference /> <sp:RequireEmbeddedTokenReference /> <sp:RequireThumbprintReference /> <sp:WssX509V1Token10/> <sp:WssX509V3Token10 /> <sp:WssX509Pkcs7Token10 /><sp:WssX509PkiPathV1Token10/><sp:WssX509V1Token11/><sp:WssX509V3Token11/><sp:WssX509Pkcs7Token11/><sp:WssX509PkiPathV1Token11/>

</wsp:Policy></sp:X509Token sp:IncludeToken>

Page 24: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions

• Token Inclusion– Never– Always– AlwaysToRecipient– Once

Page 25: WS – Security Policy

Token Assertions

• What we didn’t cover...– KerberosToken Assertion– SecurityContextToken Assertion– SecureConversationToken Assertion– SamlToken Assertion– HttpsToken Assertion

Page 26: WS – Security Policy

Security Bindings

• A set of properties that together provide enough information to secure a given message exchange.

• The bindings are identified primarily by the style of protection encryption used to protect the message exchange.

• A binding defines the following security characteristics: • The minimum set of tokens that will be used and how they are bound to messages • Any necessary key transfer mechanisms • Any required message elements (e.g. timestamps) • The content and ordering of elements in the wsse:Security header. Elements not specified in the binding are not allowed. • How correlation of messages is performed securely (if applicable to the message pattern)

Page 27: WS – Security Policy

Security Binding Assertion

• AlgorithmSuite Assertion• Layout Assertion• TransportBinding Assertion• SymmetricBinding Assertion• AsymmetricBinding Assertion

Page 28: WS – Security Policy

AlgorithmSuite• This assertion indicates a requirement for an

algorithm suite<sp:AlgorithmSuite>

<wsp:Policy> <sp:Basic256 /> <sp:Basic192 /> <sp:Basic128/> <sp:TripleDes/> </wsp:Policy>

</sp:AlgorithmSuite>

Page 29: WS – Security Policy

AlgorithmSuite

Page 30: WS – Security Policy

LayoutThis assertion indicates a requirement for a particular security header layout

<sp:Layout> <wsp:Policy> </wsp:Policy></sp:Layout>

Page 31: WS – Security Policy

Layout

Page 32: WS – Security Policy

TransportBinding• Indicates that the transport layer is used to satisfy

the security requirements <sp:TransportBinding>

<wsp:Policy> <sp:TransportToken>

<wsp:Policy> ... </wsp:Policy></sp:TransportToken><sp:AlgorithmSuite> ... </sp:AlgorithmSuite>

<sp:Layout> ... </sp:Layout> <sp:IncludeTimestamp/> </wsp:Policy> </sp:TransportBinding>

Page 33: WS – Security Policy

TransportBinding

Page 34: WS – Security Policy

SymmetricBinding• Indicates that the message layer is used to satisfy the

security requirements• Defines "Encryption Token" and "Signature Token"

properties• Where multiple messages are exchanged the tokens

perform the same functions for all messages

Page 35: WS – Security Policy

SymmetricBinding

Page 36: WS – Security Policy

AsymmetricBinding• Indicates that the message layer is used to satisfy the security

requirements• Defines “Initiator Token” and “Recipient Token” properties• The Initiator Token is used for the message signature from

initiator to recipient, and encryption from recipient to initiator.• The Recipient Token is used for encryption from initiator to

recipient, and for the message signature from recipient to initiator.

• Where multiple messages are exchanged the tokens perform different functions

Page 37: WS – Security Policy

AsymmetricBinding

Page 38: WS – Security Policy

SupportingTokens

• Services may require multiple sets of claims to be presented

• Corresponds to additional tokens in a message• Supporting tokens are included in the security

header and may optionally include additional message parts to sign and/or encrypt.

Page 39: WS – Security Policy

SupportingTokens

Page 40: WS – Security Policy

SupportingTokens

Page 41: WS – Security Policy

EncryptedSupportingTokens

• Encrypted supporting tokens are supporting tokens that are included in the security header and MUST be encrypted when they appear in the security header. Element encryption SHOULD be used for encrypting these tokens.

• The encrypted supporting tokens can be added to any SOAP message and do not require the “message signature” being present before the encrypted supporting tokens are added.

• Introduced in WS-Security Policy 1.2

Page 42: WS – Security Policy

SignedSupportingTokens

• Token specified under this assertion will be signed by the message signature.

Page 43: WS – Security Policy

SignedSupportingTokens

• If transport level security is used there won’t be any signature in the message.

Page 44: WS – Security Policy

SignedSupportingTokens

Page 45: WS – Security Policy

SignedEncryptedSupportingTokens

• Signed, encrypted supporting tokens are Signed supporting tokens that are also encrypted when they appear in the wsse:Security header. Element Encryption SHOULD be used for encrypting the supporting tokens.

• Introduced in WS-Security Policy 1.2

Page 46: WS – Security Policy

EndorsingSupportingTokens

• Endorsing tokens sign the message signature, that is they sign the entire ds:Signature element produced from the message signature and may optionally include additional message parts to sign and/or encrypt.

Page 47: WS – Security Policy

EndorsingSupportingTokens

• When transport level security is used – there is no message signature and the signature generated by the supporting token will sign the Timestamp.

Page 48: WS – Security Policy

EndorsingSupportingTokens

Page 49: WS – Security Policy

EncryptedEndorsingSupportingTokens

• Endorsing, encrypted supporting tokens are Endorsing supporting tokens that are also encrypted when they appear in the Security header. Element Encryption SHOULD be used for encrypting the supporting tokens.

• Introduced in WS-Security Policy 1.2

Page 50: WS – Security Policy

SignedEndorsingSupportingTokens

• Signed endorsing tokens sign the entire ds:Signature element produced from the message signature and are themselves signed by that message signature, that is both tokens (the token used for the message signature and the signed endorsing token) sign each other.

Page 51: WS – Security Policy

SignedEndorsingSupportingTokens• When transport level security level is used there will be

no message signature and the signature generated by the supporting token will sign the Timestamp.

Page 52: WS – Security Policy

EncryptedSignedEndorsingSupportingTokens

• Signed, endorsing, encrypted supporting tokens are signed, endorsing supporting tokens that are also encrypted when they appear in the wsse:Security header. Element Encryption SHOULD be used for encrypting the supporting tokens.

• Introduced in WS-Security Policy 1.2

Page 53: WS – Security Policy

WSS Assertions

• Specify supported version of WSS– sp:Wss10– sp:Wss11

• Specify supported token reference mechanisms via boolean properties

• Specify Signature Confirmation requirements for WSS 1.1

Page 54: WS – Security Policy

WSS10 Assertions

Page 55: WS – Security Policy

WSS10 Assertions

Page 56: WS – Security Policy

WSS11 Assertions

Page 57: WS – Security Policy

WSS11 Assertions

Page 58: WS – Security Policy

Trust Assertions

• Specify supported version of WS-Trust and associated properties– sp:Trust10

<sp:Trust10> <wsp:Policy> <sp:RequireClientEntropy /> <sp:RequireServerEntropy /> </wsp:Policy>

</sp:Trust10>

Page 59: WS – Security Policy

Trust Assertions

Page 60: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

• Define the policy within the WSDL [ in the WSDL it self or pointed to from the WSDL]

• Stand alone policy which points back to the web service or services associated with it – Arbitrary Resource Attachment

Page 61: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

Arbitrary Resource Attachment<wsp:PolicyAttachment>

<wsp:AppliesTo><wsp:EndpointReference>

<wsp:ServiceName Name=“”/> <wsp:PortType Name=“”/> <wsp:Address URI=“”/>

</wsp:EndpointReference></wsp:AppliesTo><wsp:PolicyReference Ref=“..../policy.xml/>

</wsp:PolicyAttachment>

Page 62: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

Define the policy within the WSDL - Policy can be attached to different locations in the

WSDL, which will give different meanings.- Policy that is attached higher in the hierarchy is

inherited.- If lower level element has a policy defined for it, the

parent’s attached policy will be merged with the child’s policy.

Page 63: WS – Security Policy

The Main Structure of WSDL<definition namespace = “http/… “>

<type> xschema types </type><message> … </message><port> a set of operations </port><binding> communication protocols </binding><service> a list of binding and ports </service>

<definition>

Page 64: WS – Security Policy

Policy Subjects

• WS-Policy Attachment defines various attachment points for policy.– Message Policy Subject– Operation Policy Subject– Endpoint Policy Subject

Page 65: WS – Security Policy

Message Policy Subject

• wsdl:message• wsdl:portType/wsdl:operation/wsdl:input• wsdl:portType/wsdl:operation/wsdl:output• wsdl:portType/wsdl:operation/wsdl:fault

Page 66: WS – Security Policy

Operation Policy Subject

• wsdl:portType/wsdl:operation• wsdl:binding/wsdl:operation

Page 67: WS – Security Policy

Endpoint Policy Subject

• wsdl:portType• wsdl:binding• wsdl:port

Page 68: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

Define the policy within the WSDL<wsdl>.............<wsp:UsingPolicy wsdl:required=“true”/><wsdl:message name=“LookupResponse” wsp:PolicyRef=“Q1” />.............</wsdl>

Page 69: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

Define the policy within the WSDL

<Policy Name=“Q1”></Policy>

Page 70: WS – Security Policy

Associating a Policy

Define the policy within the WSDL

<Policy Name=“Q1”></Policy>

Page 71: WS – Security Policy

Normal Form

• Policy as a collection of policy alternatives• A policy alternative as a collection of assertions• Composed of a single <wsp:ExactlyOne> operator

containing one or more <wsp:All> operators.

Page 72: WS – Security Policy

Normal Form

Page 73: WS – Security Policy

Nested Assertions

• Nested assertions describe requirements and alternatives for the enclosing assertion elements.

Page 74: WS – Security Policy

Nested Policy Normalization

• If an assertion in a normal form contains a nested policy, it can at most contain ONE policy alternative.

Page 75: WS – Security Policy

Nested Policy Normalization

Page 76: WS – Security Policy

Nested Policy Normalization

Page 77: WS – Security Policy

Compatibility

• Two assertions are compatible if the QName value of one assertion matches with a Qname value of the other assertion.

• Two policies are compatible if an alternative in one is compatible with an alternative in the other. If two policies are compatible, their intersection is the set of the intersections between all pairs of compatible alternatives, choosing one alternative from each policy. If two policies are not compatible, their intersection has no policy alternatives.

Page 78: WS – Security Policy

Policy Intersection

• Useful when two or more parties express policy and want to limit the policy alternatives to those that are mutually compatible.

• Intersection takes two policies and returns a policy.• There are two modes for intersection: strict and lax.

How the mode is selected or indicated for the policy intersection is outside the scope of this specification.

Page 79: WS – Security Policy

Policy Intersection

• If the mode is strict, two policy alternatives A and B are compatible:• if each assertion in A is compatible with an assertion in B,

and• if each assertion in B is compatible with an assertion in A.

• If the mode is lax, two policy alternatives A and B are compatible:• if each assertion in A that is not an ignorable policy

assertion is compatible with an assertion in B, and• if each assertion in B that is not an ignorable policy

assertion is compatible with an assertion in A.

Page 80: WS – Security Policy
Page 81: WS – Security Policy
Page 82: WS – Security Policy
Page 83: WS – Security Policy

lean . enterprise . middleware