Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
N O T E SISSUE 5JUNE 2013 Growing Aquaculture in Sustainable Ecosystems
BY RANDALL BRUMMETT
KEY MESSAGES• Aquacultureisamongthemostsustainableofanimal
proteinproductionsystems.
• Growthofaquacultureisneededtomeetemploymentandfoodsecuritytargetsindevelopingcountries.
• Investmentriskco-varieswithenvironmentalrisktoinfluencesustainability.
• Existingcertificationstandardsdonoteffectivelyaddressecosystemsustainability.
• Prioritiesoflocalcommunitiesshouldinformtargetsettingforemploymentandconservation.
• Locallyadaptedaquaculturezonemanagementcanreduceenvironmentalandinvestmentrisk.
Drivenbyincreasingpopulation,wealth,andthehealthbenefitsofseafood,demandforfinfishandshellfishexceedsestimatedtotalsustainablecatchofwildfishbynearly100percent(TEEB2010).Duetohighlocaldemandandtemperatures,aquacultureisandwillprobablyremainabusinessdominatedbydevelopingcountries,whereaquacultureemployedanestimated16millionpeopleinthevaluechain(0.3pers-yearspertonoffishdeliveredtomarket)in2010,halfofwhichwerewomen.Aquacultureisalreadyacredibleeconomicengineandseafood
productionsystem,havingcontributed40percent—some60millionmetrictons—tototalsupplyin2010(FAO2012).Nearlydoublinginthe13yearsfrom1995to2007,aquacultureneedstonearlydoubleagaininthenext15yearstoensuretheglobalseafoodsupply(OECD2010).However,tosecurethebenefitsofarobustaquaculturesectoroverthelongterm,theindustrymustrespectecologicallimitstogrowth.
Aquacultureinvolvesadiversearrayofproductionschemes,technologies,andspecies,andthusitisimpossibletoprovideasingleestimateforitsecologicalfootprint(Boydetal.2007;Lorenzen,Beveridge,andMangel2012)exceptatthecoarsestofscales(Halletal.2011).Mostoftheavailabledata,however,indicatethataquaculturecomparesfavorablytootheranimalfarmingintermsoffeedefficiency,eutrophyingnutrients,freshwaterconsumption,andlanduse(seeTable,below).
Nevertheless,increasingcompetitionforlandandwateraredrivingintensificationthatsometimespushthelimitsofecosystemstoabsorbimpactsandthusincreasetheriskofcatastrophicfailure.Itisinnoone’sinterestthataquaculturegrowsbeyondthecarryingcapacityofthelocalenvironment.Tooptimizethecost-benefitratioofinvestmentsinaquaculturedevelopment,oneneedstodeterminewhatkindofregulatoryframework,institutional
*Note: Consumptive use is difficult to compare across the wide spectrum of aquaculture production systems. In the vast majority of cases, water outfalls from aquaculture are much cleaner and more easily recycled than for land animals.
Source: Phillips, Beveridge, and Clarke 1991; FAO 2003; Hall et al. 2011; Bouman et al. 2013.
Food conversion (kg feed/kg
edible weight)
Protein efficiency
(%)
N emissions (kg/ton protein
produced)
P Emissions (kg/ton protein
produced)
Land (tons edible product/ha)
Consumptive freshwater
use (m3/ton)
Beef 31.7 5 1,200 180 0.24–0.37 15,497
Chicken 4.2 25 300 40 1.0–1.20 3,918
Pork 10.7 13 800 120 0.83–1.10 4,856
Finfish (average) 2.3 30 360 48 0.15–3.70 5,000
Bivalve mollusks not fed not fed -27 -29 0.28–20.00 0
TABLE. COMPARISON OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS AMONG ANIMAL PROTEIN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
*
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
2
arrangement,andmonitoringofecosystemsustainabilitymakethemostsenseformitigatingtheimpactsofourseafoodproductionsystemandmanagingrisk.
CERTIFYING SUSTAINABILITYToguideconsumersaboutsustainability,seafoodcertificationseekstocreatemarketincentivesdesignedtoencourageproducerstoreduceenvironmentalimpacts.Aquaculturecertificationschemescertifyindividualfarmsor,inafewcases,collectivesofsmallfarms.However,themostsignificantnegativeecologicalimpactsofaquaculture—lossofbiodiversityandeutrophication—donotoccuratthefarmlevel,butratherreflectthecollectiveimpactsofallfarms,certifiedorotherwise.Anobjectivedeterminationofenvironmentalsustainabilityneedstomovebeyondthefarmleveltothatofthelargeraquaticecosystem,ofwhichaquacultureformsonlyapart.
Systemstoensureecosystem-levelsustainabilityofaquacultureshouldaimtosustainindigenousspeciesabundanceanddiversityatdesirablelevelsandwillrequire(a)spatiallyexplicitregulatory/zoninginstrumentstodefinetheboundariesoverwhichaquaculturesustainabilityshouldbeassessed,and(b)sustainabilityindicatorsandmonitoringsystemsinrespecttothelocalecologicalcarryingcapacitiesofthesezones.Institutionalarrangementsthatassurecomplianceandtransparencywillbeneededtooperationalizethesystem.
Planningattheecosystemlevelwillsimplifypermittingandensurethatfarmsoccupylessenvironmentallysensitiveareas.Withinzones,collectiveactionamongfarmsandwithveterinaryservicestocontroldiseaseswouldbemadeeasier.Onceestablished,zonedaquacultureareascouldbecertifiedcollectivelysothatallfarmshaveaccesstomarkets.NorwayandScotland(salmon)andIreland(bivalves)havepioneereduser-friendlyapproachestoecosystem-levelmanagementbasedonextensive,heuristiccarryingcapacitydatasetsthatcouldinforminitiativeselsewhere.AustraliaandNewZealandareexploringaquacultureparkleasingarrangementsforsalmonandshellfish.
Withincreasingwealth,healthconsciousness,andglobalpopulation,demandforseafoodisincreasing.Atthesametime,scarcitiesofwater,arableland,andpower,combinedwithunstableclimates,willmakegrowingfoodincreasinglychallengingandcostly.Governmentsmaybetemptedtocompromiselong-termsustainabilitytomeetshort-termemploymentandfoodsecuritytargets.Sustainabilityshouldbedefinedinwaysthatthepublicunderstandssothatpolicymakersandresourcemanagerscanfulfilltheirpublictrustresponsibilitiesforsafeseafoodsupplies,thrivingcommunities,healthyecosystems,andbiodiversity.
INVESTING IN SUSTAINABILITYAquaculture,asarelativelybenignsystemfortheproductionofnutritiousfood,canmakeanimportantcontributiontoglobalfoodsecurity,butnewinvestmentof$100billion,attheveryleast,1isneededtomeetanticipateddemand.Thegenerallysmallscaleandorganicgrowthofaquaculturehasmadeitdifficulttoregulateandcontributestothehighlevelsofriskperceivedbypotentialnewinvestors.Becausediseaseandnegativeenvironmentalimpacts,themajorexogenousriskfactorsinaquaculture,aredeterminedprimarilybywatermanagement,productionintensity,andproximityoffishfarmstooneanother,thereareclearincentivesforresponsibleaqua-farmerstosupportzoningandecosystemmonitoringtoensuresustainabilityandprotecttheirinvestments.
Usefulsustainabilityindicatorsshouldreflectanunderstandingofhowecosystemsfunctionandtheservicesthatthepublicexpectsfunctionalecosystemstogenerate.Theyshouldalsoberobustandeasytomonitor,andwouldnecessarilybedeterminedbytheecosystemandinformedbylocalprioritiesratherthanbyfarmedspeciesorculturesystem.Adefinitionofaquaculturesustainabilitythatringstruewiththelargersocietywillcapturecomplexityinarelativelysimpleindexcomprisingalimitednumberoficonicindicators.
LifeCycleAssessment(LCA)seekstodefinesustainabilityinthebroadsensebycomparingfoodproductionsystemsintermsofimpactonprocessesthatgovernglobalbiogeochemicalcycles(PelletierandTyedmers2008).SomeLCAindicators(forexample,acidification,ecotoxicity,eutrophication)arerelevantattheecosystemlevel(forexample,Fordetal.2012).Curyetal.(2011)andSmithetal.(2011)haveexploredtrophiccascadesthatmightbeadaptableaslocalindicatorsofecosystemstress.Fortheseapproaches,however,dataandanalysistosupportapracticallocaldefinitionofecosystemsustainabilityandcost-effectivemonitoringsystemaregenerallylacking.
Tobeeffectiveinprojectdesignandimplementation,weneedanarrowerdefinitionofsustainabilitythatincludestheestablishmentofaworkableapproachtoecosystem-levelmanagement.Thisshouldbeajointeffortbetweenthepublicregulatory,research,andveterinaryservicesandprivatesectorinvestors.Concertedresearchthatcouldestablishatestableframeworkforensuringaquaculturesustainabilityforpilotingwould:
• Developasimplifiedbiodiversity/waterqualityindexofsustainabilityattheecosystemlevel;
1 Industryestimateofcostat2012pricesofbuildingtypicalaquaculturefarmstodoublesupply,notconsideringnewtechnology.
3
• Adaptspatialplanningtoaquaticecosystemdelineationandaquaculturezoning;and
• Elaborateinstitutionalframeworksforadaptivemanagement,monitoring,andenforcement.
Ecosystemsinwhichaquacultureandotherhumanactivitiesoccurwillchange,butnotallchangeisbad.Well-managedaquaculturegeneratesmodest(relativetothegoodsandservicesitgenerates),oftenunnoticeable,changesthatdonotupsetthenaturalbalanceoftheecosystem.Inmanycases,impactsofaquaculturewillbepositiveintermsofecosystemservices.Indicatorsofsustainabilityshouldcapturethesechangestoenablesoundmanagement.
CONCLUSIONSToimprovetheclimateforaquacultureinvestmentsoastosustainablymeetfoodsecurityandeconomicdevelopmenttargets
withoutcausingenvironmentaldegradation,anewapproachtomanaginggrowthisneeded.Spatialplanningwillidentifybestsitesthataregoodforaquaculture,awayfromenvironmentallysensitiveareasandamenabletoappropriatemonitoring.Asindicatorsofsustainability,existingcertificationsystemsarenotadequate.Neededareobjectiveindicatorsthattakeintoaccountthecollectiveimpactsofaquacultureattheecosystemlevel.
OpportunitiesexisttolearnfromexistinginitiativesinAustralia,Ireland,NewZealand,Norway,andtheUnitedKingdom.Theseshouldbeassessedforrobustnessandapplicabilityacrossarangeoflikelyecosystemswhereaquacultureispracticed(forexample,tropicallagoons,floodplainrivers,coastalbays,estuaries,coralreefs,andsoon).Thelevelofimpactsfromaquaculturethatistolerableshouldbeassessedforarangeofecosystemservicesconsideredindicativeofecosystemhealthandthewishesofinformedlocalcommunities.Reliabilityandpracticality(includingcost-effectiveness)ofmeasurementsshouldbeconsideredintheselectionofindicators.
WHAT’S IN IT FOR ME?
Compliancewithaquaculturezoningwilldependuponthedegreetowhichstakeholdersperceiveadvantageincollectiveecosystemmanagement.Cost/benefitanalysismustconsiderconstraintsimposeduponresourceusersaswellasreturnsoninvestmentintheconservationofecosystemservices.Costswillincludelimitationsonfarmerbehaviorwithinzones,scientificmonitoringandtheneedforcommunicationandcollaborationamongfarmersandbetweenfarmersandregulators.Motivationstoestablishandoperatesus-tainableaquaculturezonesvaryamongstakeholders,butthebenefitsaremany:
What’s in it for farmers?• Reduceriskofpoorstockperformance,diseaseandfishkills;• reducethecostandcomplexityofenvironmentalimpactassessment;• laytheframeworkforanewapproachtocertificationandincreasemarketaccess;• improvesustainability—economic,socialandenvironmental—ofaqua-businesses;• demonstrategoodstewardshipoftheenvironment;• lowerinsuranceratesandeasecredittermsondemonstrablylowerriskinvestments.
What’s in it for regulators?• Crediblescientificbasisfordecision-makingonnumbers,sizes,intensitiesofoperationsinamarine/aquaticspace;• crediblescientificbasisforaquaculturegovernanceandallinteractionswithcivilsociety;• crediblescientificbasistoincreasebothlocalandexportmarketaccessfor“green”products.
What’s in it for society?• Wiseuseofecosystemservices;• sustainablyproduced,nutritiousseafoodforthosewhoneeditmost;• betterandfairermanagementofresourcesusedtoproduceaquaticfood.
What’s in it for the environment?• Assurethatanassessmentofsustainabilitycapturesthecollectiveimpactsofallaquacultureoperationsinaclearlydefinedarea;• makesurethatchangesattributabletoaquacultureareclearlyrelatedtochangesintheecosystem;• streamlineregulationtobemorecost-effective.
1818 H Street. NW Washington, DC 20433 www.worldbank.org/rural
Wherethereareexistingdata,pilotprojectswiththeprivatesectorcouldbelaunchedtofield-testthisnewmonitoringandevaluationstrategywithintwoyears.Keyelementswouldincludethefollowing:
Ecological Issues
• Siting:Identifyzonesthataregoodforaquaculture(forexample,accesstomarketsandproductioninfrastructure,deepwater,fastcurrents,protectedfromstorms,unpolluted)andthatareawayordownstreamfromimportantecosystemandbiodiversityassets(from,coralreefs,beaches,eelgrassbeds).Thisisroughlythesubjectmatterofspatialplanning.
• CarryingCapacity:Measureexactlywhatishappeningintheecosystemandhowfastcollectiveproductionwithinthezoneisapproachingsomelimit.Thisismostlybasicecologicalresearch.
Institutional Issues
• SettingLimits:Establishwiththelocalcommunityandotherkeystakeholdersthemaincriteriaforimpactassessmentandacceptablelimitsofecosystemchangeinlightofthelocalcultureandeconomy.
• Enforcement:Establisharegulatoryframeworkbasedontheabove,givingauthoritytosomelocalagencytoenforcerules.Thisalsorequiressomekindofaquaculturetradeassociationthatrepresentstheinterestsoftheaquaculturevaluechaintogovernmentandcompetingindustries,andexercisesausefullevelofcontroloveritsmembers.
ReferencesBouman,A.F.,A.H.W.Beusen,C.C.Overbeek,D.P.Bureau,M.Pawlowski,
andP.M.Gilbert.2013.Hindcastsandfutureprojectionsofglobalinlandandcoastalnitrogenandphosphorusloadsduetofinfishaquaculture.Reviews in Fisheries Science21(2):112-156.
Boyd,C.E.,C.Tucker,A.McNevin,K.Bostick,andJ.Clay.2007.Indicatorsofresourceuseefficiencyandenvironmentalperformanceinfishandcrustaceanaquaculture.Reviews in Fisheries Science 15(4):327–360.
Cury,P.M.,I.L.Boyd,S.Bonhommeau,T.Anker-Nilssen,R.J.M.Crawford,R.W.Furness,J.A.Millsetal.2011.Globalseabirdresponsetoforagefishdepletion:One-thirdforthebirds.Science334:1703-1706.
FAO.2003.Agriculture Food and Water.FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations,Rome.
———.2012.The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture.FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations,Rome.
Ford,J.S.,N.L.Pelletier,F.Ziegler,A.J.Scholz,P.H.Tyedmers,U.Sonesson,S.A.Kruse,andH.Silverman.2012.ProposedlocalecologicalimpactcategoriesandindicatorsforLifeCycleAssessmentofaquaculture.Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(2):254-265.
Hall,S.J.,A.Delaporte,M.J.Phillips,M.Beveridge,andM.O’Keefe.2011.Blue frontiers: Managing the Environmental Costs of Aquaculture.WorldFishCenter,Penang,Malaysia.
Lorenzen,K.,M.C.M.Beveridge,andM.Mangel.2012.Culturedfish:Integrativebiologyandmanagementofdomesticationandinteractionswithwildfish.Biological Reviews 87(3):639-660.
OECD.2010.“Advancingtheaquacultureagenda:Workshopproceedings.”OrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopment,OECDPublishing,Paris,France.
Pelletier,N.,andP.Tyedmers.2008.Lifecycleconsiderationsforimprovingsustainabilityassessmentsinseafoodawarenesscampaigns.Environmental Management,DOI10.1007/s00267-008-9148-9.
Phillips,M.J.,M.C.M.Beveridge,andR.M.Clarke.1991.Impactofaquacultureonwaterresources.InAquaculture and Water Quality,editedbyD.R.BruneandJ.R.Tomasso.WorldAquacultureSociety,BatonRouge,LA,USA.
Smith,A.D.M.,C.J.Brown,C.M.Bulman,E.A.Fulton,P.Johnson,I.C.Kaplan,H.Lozano-Montesetal.2011.Impactsoffishinglow-trophiclevelspeciesonmarineecosystems.Science 333:1147-1150.
TEEB.2010.Rethinking Global Biodiversity Strategies: Exploring Structural Changes in Production and Consumption to Reduce Biodiversity Loss.TheEconomicsofEcosystemsandBiodiversityProject(TEEB),NetherlandsEnvironmentalAssessmentAgency,TheHague/Bilthoven.
Contributors2
MichaelTlusty(NewEnglandAquarium),GeorgeChamberlain(GlobalAquacultureAlliance),ChrisMann(PewEnvironmentGroup),JoséVillalón(WorldwideFundforNature),FrankAsche(UniversityofStavanger),DorisSoto(UNFoodandAgricultureOrganization),Jean-FrançoisBaroiller(CentreInternationaldeRechercheAgronomiquepourlaDéveloppement),ClaudeBoyd(AuburnUniversity),JohnHargreaves(WorldAquacultureMagazine),JohnForster(FreelanceConsultant),BarryCosta-Pierce(UniversityofNewEngland),KaiLorenzen(UniversityofFlorida),IanBoyd(UKDepartmentforEnvironment,FoodandRuralAffairs),MaxTroell(BeijerInstituteofEcologicalEconomics),VillyChristensen(UniversityofBritishColumbia),DaveLittle(UniversityofStirling),YngveTorgersen(NorwegianMinistryofFisheriesandCoastalAffairs),MalcolmBeveridge(WorldFishCenter),SimonBush(UniversityofWageningen),PeterMumby(UniversityofQueensland),LesKaufman(BostonUniversity),AntonImmink,(SustainableFisheriesPartnership).
2 Thisopinionwaselaboratedthroughanextendeddialogueamongthecontributorsanddoesnotnecessarilyreflectthepositionsoftheinstituteswithwhichtheyareaffiliated.