Upload
orien
View
33
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Workshop summary PSTP2011. International spin physics committee:. PSTP2011 Scientific sessions. Session 1: Polarized electron sources (chair E. Tsentalovich) 6 Talks Session 2: Polarimetry (chair: Y. Makdisi) 5 Talks Session 3: Polarized internal targets, ABS (chair D. Toporkov) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Workshop summaryWorkshop summary PSTP2011 PSTP2011
Workshop SummaryDmitriy Toporkov 1
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary
International spin physics committee:
Steffens E., Erlangen (Chair) Roser T., BNL (Past-Chair) Milner R.G., MIT (Chair-Elect)
Anselmino M., Torino Belov A.S., INR Bradamante F. *, Trieste
Courant E.D. *, BNL Crabb D.G. *, Virginia Gao H., Duke
Efremov A.V., JINR Fidecaro G. *, CERN Haeberli W. *, Wisconsin
Imai K., Kyoto Krisch A.D., Michigan Lenisa P., INFN
Mallot G., CERN Masaike A. *, Kyoto van Oers W.T.H. *, Manitoba
Poelker M., JLAB Prepost R., Wisconsin Prescott C.Y. *, SLAC
Saito N., KEK Sakai H., Tokyo Soergel V. *, Heidelberg
Stephenson E.J., Indiana Stroher H., COSY Tyurin N.E., IHEP
* Honorary Members
PSTP2011PSTP2011Scientific sessionsScientific sessions
Session 1: Polarized electron sources (chair E. Tsentalovich)6 TalksSession 2: Polarimetry (chair: Y. Makdisi)5 TalksSession 3: Polarized internal targets, ABS (chair D. Toporkov)4 TalksSession 4: Polarized ion sources (chair A. Belov)3 TalksSession 5: Prospects of polarized experiments (chair E. Steffens)5 TalksSession 6: Polarized solid targets (chair D. Crabb)6 Talks
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 4
Status of Spin Physics and Experiments
Erhard SteffensUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg
Chair, International Committee for Spin Physics Symposia
Diffraction
DIS Material science with pol. neutrons
Nucl. structure
Spin structure
SPIN TOOL
S
Spin tools are discussed in detail at Workshops (regular or topical)
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 5
Polarized electron sources
Eric J. Riehn, BNL
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 6
Period Dependence of Time Response of Period Dependence of Time Response of Strained Semiconductor SuperlatticesStrained Semiconductor Superlattices
Leonid G. Gerchikov State Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Partial electron localization leads to non-exponential decay of pulse response. Analysis of pulse response allows to determine the characteristic times of capture and detachment processes. Partial electron localization decreases considerably the diffusion length in SL Partial electron localization limits QE for thick working layer. For practical application one should employ SL photocathodes with no more than 10 – 12 periods.
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 7
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 8
Status of high intensity polarized electron gun project at MIT-Bates
Evgeni Tsentalovich, MIT
Current status The gun chamber: built and tested. It was vented 3 weeks ago to install the first dipole followed the gate valve and 2 additional NEGs. Rebaked and HV reprocessed. The preparation chamber: design is completed, the main chamber has been manufactured, many parts are already ordered. Load lock – the design is in progress. Beam line – conceptual design is completed, some parts are designed, the dipole vacuum chambers have been manufactured.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
R,mm
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 9
Marcus Wagner
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 10
Commissioning results of the SRF gun with Pb cathode R. Barday, HZB
few hunderd nm thick Pb cathode film
Energy Recovery Linac BERLinPro
Development of the SRF gun in a staged approach
Beam energy 50 MeV
Average current 100 mA
Bunch charge 77 pC
Normalized emittance <1 mm mrad
Repetition rate 1.3 GHz
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 11
Polarimetry
Polarized beam in RHIC in Run 2011.Polarimetry at RHIC A.Zelenski, BNL
Faraday rotation polarimeter Lamb-shift polarimeter 200 MeV - absolute polarimeter AGS p-Carbon CNI polarimeter RHIC p-Carbon CNI polarimeter RHIC - absolute H-jet
polarimeter Local polarimeters at STAR and PHENIX
H-jet is an ideal polarimeter !
High (~4.5%) analyzing power in a wide energy range (23-250 GeV).
High event rate due to high intensity (~100 mA) circulated beam current in the storage ring (~6% statistical accuracy in one 8hrs. long fill
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 12
Source, Linac, AGS-injector polarimetrs.Hjet:
Absolute polarization measurements Absolute normalization for other RHIC Polarimeters
pC: Separate for blue and yellow beamsNormalization from HJetPolarization vs. time in a fillPolarization profileFill-by-fill polarizations for experiments
PHENIX and STAR Local Polarimeters: Monitor spin direction (through transverse spin component) at collisionPolarization vs time in a fill (for trans. pol. beams)Polarization vs bunch (for trans. pol. beams)
Polarized beams in RHICA.Zelenski, BNL
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 13
Extra Physics with an Atomic Beam Source and a Lamb-Shift Polarimeter
Ralf Engels, JCHP / Institut für Kernphysik, FZ Jülich
PIT@ANKEBound β decay Precision Spectroscopy of H and D Polarized Molecules
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 14
Proton Polarimetry at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Future Upgrades
Yousef I. Makdisi, Brookhaven National LaboratoryFor the RHIC Polarimetry Group
Weak (if any) energy dependence pp elastic scattering in CNI region is ideal for polarimetry in wide beam energy range
24 GeV: PRD 79, 094014(2009)31 GeV: Preliminary100 GeV: PLB 638 (2006) 450250 GeV: Preliminary
Weak energy dependence pC elastic scattering in CNI region is good for polarimetry in wide beam energy range
31 GeV 100 GeV 250 GeV
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 15
Systematic Errors Studies in the RHIC/AGS Proton-Carbon CNI PolarimetersAndrei Poblaguev, Brookhaven National Laboratory
• Different types of detectors were tested in the Run 2011• Results of polarization measurements were consistent within 1-2% accuracy• No significant variation of the results of measurements were observed during the whole 4 month run.• The polarimeter has a capability to measure analyzing power up to the arbitrary normalization factor, but accurate study of the systematic errors is needed for that.• Standard energy calibration method was found to be unreliable, new method of calibration are suggested but more development is still needed.• Experimental evaluation of the rate effect is consistent with estimation of pileup contribution.• More accurate control of energy losses in the target is needed.
summary
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 16
POLARIZED INTERNAL TARGETS and ABSStorage cells for internal experimentswith Atomic Beam
Source at the COSY storage ringKirill Grigoryev Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, GermanyPetersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia
dimensions 15x20x370 (140+230) mm3
material 25μm Al + 5μm Teflon
Atomic hydrogen target density - 1.34 · 1013 at/cm2
Openable storage cell configuration: dimensions 11x11x390 (190+200) mm3
material 25μm Al + 5μm Teflon Fixed storage cell configuration:
Expected atomic hydrogen target - 4.7 · 1013 at/cm2
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 17
A.Belov, INR RAS
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 18
Possibility to obtain a polarized hydrogen molecular target
D. Toporkov BINP, Novosibirsk, RussiaD. Toporkov BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia
Suggested source of polarized molecules
Intensities of polarized beams from the Atomic Beam sources seems have reached it’s limit of about 1017at/sec.
Proposed source of polarized ortho-hydrogen (o-H2 ) molecules probably will provide intensity by order of magnitude higher.
An opening questions are preservation of polarizationof molecules under injection into the storage cell and realization of huge differential pumping system neededto get good vacuum condition.
Summarry
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 19
Modification of the Pumping System of the Polarized Atomic Beam Source (ABS)at the ANKE facility in COSY- Jülich
Viplav Gupta, IKP/Jülich, Jülich Center for Hadron Physics, FZJülich,Germany
• Installation at a test chamber
• All components tested successfully
• Pressure achieved in the system ≈ 3*10-8 mbar
Current Status
All 3 cryogenic pumps are to be replaced by 4 turbomolecular pumps made available from previous experiments
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 20
POLARIZED ION SOURCESHigh-Intensity Polarized H- Beam production in Charge-exchange CollisionsA.Zelenski, BNL
Atomic H injector produces an order of magnitude higher brightness beam thanpresent ECR source. A 5-10 mA polarized H- ion current (50-100 mA proton current) can be obtained for the smaller (higher brightness) beam. The basic limitation on the production ofthe high-intensity (~300 mA) , high-brightnessunpolarized H- ion beam in charge – exchange collisions will be also studied.
Higher polarization is expected with the fast atomic beam source due to:
a) elimination of neutralization in residual hydrogen; b) better Sona-transition efficiency for the smaller diameter beam; c) use of higher ionizer field (up to 3.0 kG), while still keeping the beam emittance below 2.0 π mm∙mrad, due to the smaller beam diameter.
All these factors combined will further increase polarization in the pulsed OPPIS to over 85%.
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 21
Status of the Source of Polarized Ions for the JINR accelerator complex
V.V. Fimushkin Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna
colider 2CT- 534 (C
Ring = 534 m)July 2010
The new flagship JINR project in high energy nuclear physics, NICA
(Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility), aimed at the study of phase
transitions instrongly interacting nuclear matter at the highest possible
baryon density, was put forward in 2006
Charge-exchange plasma
ionizer hard ware status70%ready
Extraction chamber hard ware status
ready
ABS hard ware statusready
Intensive work on preparation of the ABS for tests iscarried out at INR of RAS (Moscow) Operating tests of the ABS systems are planned in 2011 The first tests of the SPI charge-exchange ionizer atJINR are planned in 2011 also
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 22
A.Holler, Julich
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 23
Yu.Kiselev
Prospects of polarized experiments
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 24
Precursor experiments to search forpermanent electric dipole Moments (EDMs) of protons and deuterons at COSY
Frank Rathmann, Juelich.
A permanent EDM of a fundamental particle violates both parity (P) and time reversal symmetry (T).Assuming CPT to hold, the combined symmetry CP is violated as well.
Next step: • Scrutinize potential of different Principal Experiments
Systematic error estimates for all PEs require reliable spin tracking tools.
Top priority to make them available ASAP!• Identify PE with best systematic limit on dp,d.
PE 1: Use a combination of a snake and RF fieldsPE 2: Dual Beam Method (equivalent to g-2 d) for p and dPE 3: Resonance Method with RF E-fieldsPE 4: Resonance Method of EDM Measurements in SR
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 25
A possible way to measure the deuteron EDM at COSYN.Nikolaev (IKP FZJ & Landau Inst)
The deuteron EDM < 1 E-24 e cm is within the reach of COSY supplemented by RFE-flipper running at approx. 5 % of the ring frequency Similar upper bound is feasible for the proton An obviously long way from an ideal ring to the real thing plagued by systematics But there is an in situ access to sytematics via the magnetic moment of the deuteron (proton...)
A magic storage ring for protons (electrostatic), deuterons, …
“Freeze“ horizontal spin precession; watchfor development of a vertical component !
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 26
First experiments with the polarized internal gas target at ANKE/COSY
Maxim Mikirtychyants for the ANKE collaboration FZ Jülich / JCHP and PNPI (Gatchina)What makes the difference in positive and negative polarization?
Target performanceReliable operationHigh target densityHigh polarization
PolarimetryOnline HFT tuning using the LSPOnline data analysis procedure
InstrumentsPoint-like target (jet)Unpolarized Gas Supply System (background measurements)
Summary
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 27
DOUBLE POLARIZED DD-FUSION
P. Kravtsov, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Russia
ABS
LSP
dd-polarimeteror LSP
Ion source
n , p
(2.4 MeV)(3.0 MeV)
3 2+
3 +He , H
(0.8 MeV)(1.0 MeV)
d+ (1-32 keV)
d+
d0 (0.1 eV)
d0 (0.1 eV)
++++
®++
++
epH
enHedd
3
230
rr
Polarized Atomic Beam Sourcebased on ABS(from Cologne University)I 1Target densityVector polarization: 0.7
SAPIS project
~ ∙ 10 a/s ~ 10 a/cm
±
16
211
Polarized Ion Sourcebased on POLIS source(
≤( 3 )
≤
KVI, Groningen)Ion beam: I 20 A1. ∙ 10 d/s
E 32 keV
μ14
beam
Vector polarization: 0.7±
Lamb-Shift Polarimeter
Wien filter
Starting experiment 2012-2013
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 28
Perspectives for Polarized AntiprotonsPaolo Lenisa, Università di Ferrara and INFN – ITALY, on behalf of the PAX-Collaboration
September 2011 ongoing beamtime:
II Ring polarization studiesI. Measurement of polarization lifetime: P>105sII. Measurement of spin-flip efficiency: =0.987
WASA
e-cooler
ANKE
PAX
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 29
Polarized solid targetPNPI polarized target for pion-nucleon scattering measurements at intermediate energies
D.V. Novinsky Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Leningrad district, 188350, Russia
method of proton magnetic resonance (PMR),polarization pump by the dynamic nuclear orientation method up to absolute value 70–80% measurements are based on the calculations of square under the PMR curve: the system containing Q-meter with sequential contour and signal digitalizationCalibration is based on the equilibrium state at temperature 0.8 – 1.4 K
Successful target work > 20 years Modernization and new tests are requiredNew physics tasks
In memory of A.I. Kovalev (1936-2011)
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 30
Alexander Berlin, Ruhr Universitat Bochum
Conclusion
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 31
G.Reicherz
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 32
The polarized solid target for the cristal ball experiment at MAMIA.Thomas
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 33
Development of polarized HD target for LEPS experimentsHideki Kohri , RCNP Osaka University Japan
Purity of HD : about 99%Temperature : T = 14 mK Magnetic Field : B = 17 TeslaAging time : 53 daysExpected Polarization : 80%(H)Measured Polarization : 40%(H)Measured relaxation time (T1) : 100 days
First production of polarized HD target(2008Nov-2009Jan We are developing a polarized HD target.
We tried to produce the polarized HD target in 2009. Although the polarization degree was small(40%), the relaxation time was long enough for LEPS experiments.
We developed new NMR system, gas analyzer system, and gas distillation system for future production of polarized HD target. These systems are working well. We plan to carry out an experiment using polarized HD target in the next year.
We constructed a new beam-line (LEPS2) at SPring-8. The BNL/E949 spectrometer will be transported to SPring-8 in this year.
Summary and future plan
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 34
Polarized solid 3He target created by the brute force method for medical useMasayoshi Tanaka, Department of Clinical Technology, Kobe Tokiwa University, Kobe, Japan
To reduce the risk arising from the radiation This is our motivation to start the “NSI” (Nuclear Spin Imaging ) - MRI with the Hyperpolarized Nuclei. Basically, the NSI uses a polarizer and conventional MRI, no need for constructing a new device except for the polarizer itself.
I. Practical use of hyperpolarized 3He-MRI for medical diagnosis:1) Basic study on lung, e.g., ventilation Time dependence
2) Medical diagnosis for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary
Disease) with ADC (Apparent Diffusion Coefficient) etc.
Future prospect
ConclusionThe technical part of the first step, i.e. experimental verification of production of the hyperpolarized 3He is on going.
Dmitriy Toporkov Workshop Summary 35
I would like to thank to the members of Program Committee who help me a lot during the preparation of the program
Alexander BelovRalf Engels
Frank RathmannErhard Steffens
Masayoshi TanakaEugeni Tsentalovich
Final remarkFinal remark
Workshop SummaryDmitriy Toporkov 36
We had an excellent week with inspiring talks and discussions.Alexander and the organizers did a fantastic job!Many thanks to the Local organizing committee:
Alexander Vasilyev Mariya MarusinaEugeniya Brui Peter Kravtsov Kirill Grigoriev