Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Workshop. From Learning Organisation to
Governance 2.0 and Social Network
Target audience: principals of educational establishments, leaders and decision-makers for education, teachers of teacher
Among the above list, participants of this workshop will develop an awareness of some necessities and prerequisites to reach the Knowledge Society.
• Investigating the concept of Learning Organisation, using ICT as a key issue
• Lifelong Learning (LLL) Approaches
• Prerequisites for the Knowledge Society
• Components of a Sustainable Teacher Education in a Knowledge Society
• Tools, Methods and Good Practice
• Reengineering Teacher Education: Cultural Diversity, Management, External Factors, Hows & Whats
• Towards a New Sustainable Teacher Education in the 21st Century School
• Sharing Draft Scenarios Elaborated by the Participants
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
7 / 2 / 5.31 / 9 / 90
1 / 2 / 3 / 4Social networks
I will limit myself in this round table to ….
DIGITAL PEDAGOGY ==>
Good rebound after my talk of this morning and the workshop of tomorrow and…
some coherence….
Plenary session. Part 3
Education in the Smart Society:
What Should it Be?How can we get extra effect using ICTs in education? What are the ways to produce and transfer efficiently new ideas and knowledge in information environments? What are required characters of teachers providing
the students with knowledge and what will be the students in several years? Should be the traditional
approach to education changed and what for? Or no changes – what result?
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011Smart e-Learning Russia 2011 - MESI
« Christmas tree»• Static WORLD Dynamic WORLD
• Information static Information dynamic
• Paper Numeric/digital
• Tree structure, Network
• (hierarchy, pyramid)• Difficulties of cohabitation everyday in all activities
of the daylife between tree and network !!!! Think about it
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/doc/Michel-Serres-speech-at-INRIA-AMc-vfE.dochttp://interstices.info/jcms/c_33030/les-nouvelles-technologies-revolution-culturelle-et-cognitive R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
From last IFIP AGORA meeting (2nd of June) in Torun with namely inputs of B. Cornu, M. Webb and M. Turcsanyi-Szabo
Digital Pedagogy and Learning 3.0 To think pedagogy and to invent digital pedagogy To invent pedagogy for the generation Y
– Generation of maximum unemployement– Generation of the AIDS time– Generation of social network– Generation of new ICT
To invent pedagogy of a new TIME and a new SPACE
To move from paper to digital network To invent mobile pedagogy (not only transfert old
pedagogy to mobile)
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
To learn on social pedagogy - I’m not alone
To invent new network To augment pedagogy, to enrich pedagogy
(not technologies enrich learning and pedagogy) To understand personal pedagogy
- My personal parameters To imagine long-term personal routes, new paths,…. To respect diversity of pedagogieS What can be the professions in the digital
pedagogy ? To take care of digital Literacy
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
To kill asap the wellworm / hackneyed model old of 9 centuaries
Competencies of the digital natives ?• Speed and anticipation• Filtering• Taking risks (taking decisions)• New status of error (« game over try again »)There were the same competencies for my tuk tuk driver in India …. Not specifically those for digital natives …it’s also those from irresponsible bodies…!!
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
1. Collaborative environment of type WEB 2.0
2. Modification of the organisation
0. Invariants to explicite
3. Competencies & Know-how
4. Gouvernance
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation (cybernetics)
6. Communication
7. Actions for accompagnying the changes - Empowerment
8. .........................
SEOUL 2.0first draft of a generic
model usefull for IFIP 2.0
RM->PC-Seoul AGORA/2.05.07
"Job" fonctionnalities
Fonctionnalities of a learning organisation
Tools with open access on Internet
Innovation potentialities(contrains & advantages)
1. Collaborative environment of type WEB 2.0
Evolution of the existing structure to a network type structure structure
The bottlenecks disappear
Developping the participation of all actors 2.
Modification of the organisation
Specificities of the organism
Objectives & StrategyStatus & Observations
Local conditions
0. Invariants to explicite
Explicitation of implicite ways
Know-hows transmission
To promoote and facilite informal education/learning
Attitudes "LifeLong Learning"
Storage & putting at disposal the explicite information
3. Competencies & Know-how
Transparency
Aims of harmonny betweenthe members of the organisation
Flexibility Fores
ight 4. Gouvernance
Criteria & Evaluation
Regulation
Projects
5. Piloting the processes inside the organisation (cybernetics)
internalexternal
6. Communication
7. Actions for accompagnying the changes - Empowerment
8. .........................
SEOUL 2.0first draft of a generic
model usefull for IFIP 2.0
RM->PC-Seoul AGORA/2.05.07
European Union – key competencesThe Reference Framework sets out eight key competences:
1) Communication in the mother tongue;2) Communication in foreign languages;3) Mathematical competence and basic competences in
science and technology;4) Digital competence;5) Learning to learn;6) Social and civic competences;7) Sense of initiative and entrepreneurship;8) Cultural awareness and expression.
IndicatorscriteriaandbenchmarksforinternationalcomparisonsAssessingtheeffectsofICTineducation9609111E.pdf
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/IClas_brochure.pdf
eStart conference 17-18nov08 IFIP Agora Initiative Raymond Morel (IFIP - SATW - SEM)
Mandat de pré-étude pour un Living Lab “e-Inclusion» Partnership between CTI and SATW with the ICT Commission
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/DocCubeFRA3.pdfSome documentation on Living Labshttp://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/spip.php?article84
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/spip.php?article83
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/treffle-syncom-satw-minusio.pdf
EU project MATURE
www.ercim.org
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/HR2011.pdf
http://www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/EIU_Digital_economy_rankings_2010_FINAL_WEB.pdf
http:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/D-IND-MEAS_WSIS-2011-PDF-E.pdfhttp:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/WTDR2010_ExecSum-en.pdf R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
http:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/WTDR2010_ExecSum-en.pdfR. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
Note: * Data in this chart refer to countries that have collected data on the number of households with Internet access at home through official national surveys
Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database.
Proportion of countries collecting Indicator HH6* (Households with Internet access at home)
by region
50.0
28.634.2
47.4
86.0
62.9
16.3
0102030405060708090
100
Africa ArabStates
Asia &Pacific
CIScountries
TheAmericas
Europecountries
World
%
2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009At least one year between:
Progress in measuring Internet access
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators database.
Note: * Data in this chart refer to countries that have collected data on individuals using the Internet through official national surveys
Progress in measuring Internet users
Proportion of countries collecting Indicator HH7* (Internet users)
by region
7.0
21.1
33.3 40.0 41.7
81.4
37.5
0102030405060708090
100
Africa Asia &Pacific
Arab States Americas CIS Europe All ITUmembers
%
2001-2003 2004-2006 2007-2009
At least one year between:
R. Morel (SATW/IFIP) Moscow, 8-9 of June 2011
http:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/D-IND-MEAS_WSIS-2011-PDF-E.pdfhttp:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/WTDR2010_ExecSum-en.pdf
http:/www.ict-21.ch/com-ict/IMG/pdf/WTDR2010_ExecSum-en.pdf
