WORKPLAN TWG VPro-poor energy strategy

by : Duha A.K

Grand Candi Hotel - Semarang, July 10th 2011

OUTLINE PLAN Selection of location. Needs assessment process.

Visit to the target village Sosialization Collecting the quesionnaires Analyze outcome of energy needs assessment. Writing the report (final summary)

Continue policy evaluation (look for references and regulation, interview with stake holder on provincial programme.

Target Location

Target Location

10 7

5

6 4 9

1

8

3

Selection of Location

1. “Tobati “ Village.2. “Enggros” Village.3. “Kayu Pulo” Village.4. “Nafri” Village.5. “Puay” Village.6. “Yoka” Village..7. “Kalkhote” Village..8. “Skouw” Village.9. “Koya Koso” Village.10.“Harapan” Village.

2

Enggros Village

Tobati Village

Results from the Energy Needs Assessment Workshop in The Enggros Village : The number of family heads approximately 115 families, with a

livelihood as fisherman. People who attended the workshop programme is 42 people

(according to absent). Based on questionnaire results :• The average of income for each month of the local people in Enggros

village is 750,000 IDR.• Most people felt it was no longer able to use generator or battery

for everyday activities, because operational and maintenance are very costly.

• Average consumption of gasoline and kerosene are 2 – 3 liters per day per household.

• Gasoline and Kerosene price is 7,000 IDR per liter.• The total money they have spent to buy fuel is 1,000,000 IDR

(approx.). / month. This is not comparable with their income which is only 750,000 IDR / month

• All the communities have agreed that solar-cell is suitable to their conditions and circumstances (to solve the energy problem).

QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYZE RESULT

1. Fuel used for cooking at home needsFuel Type Amount/day Cost/unit Amount/month Cost/month

Kerosene 2 ltr 7,000 IDR 60 ltr 420,000 IDR

LPG - - - -

Fire Wood 6 stalks - 180 stalks -

Others - - - -

2. Fuel used for the purpose of going to sea

Fuel Type Amount/day Cost/unit Amount/month Cost/month

Kerosene - 7,000 IDR - -

Gasoline 10 ltr 7,000 IDR 300 ltr 2,100,000 IDR

Others - - - -

3. Fuel used for lighting

Fuel Type Amount/day Cost/unit Amount/month Cost/month

Kerosene 1 ltr 7,000 IDR 30 ltr 210,000 IDR

Candle 3 sticks 2,500 IDR 90 sticks 225,000 IDR

Gasoline 2 ltr 7,000 IDR 60 ltr 420,000 IDR

Battery / Accu - - 10 pcs 50,000 IDR

Others - - - -

4. The energy used by the people directly

Public facilities Types of energy sources used

Number of units

Costs / month Who pays for it

Health facilities

a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

1 Unit

1 Unit

500,000 IDR

200,000 IDR

Local Government

Local Goverment

Church a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

1 Unit

- Unit

500,000 IDR

-

Self-help society

Self-help society

Meeting Room a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

1 Unit

- Unit

500,000 IDR

-

Self-help society

Self-help society

Village Hall a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

- Unit

1 Unit

-

200,000 IDR

Self-help society

Self-help society

Chief Village Office

a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

c) PV panel

1 Unit

- Unit

1 Unit

500,000 IDR

-

100,000 IDR

Self-help society

Self-help society

Self-help society

Type of Equipment

Types of energy sources used

Number of units

Costs / month Who pays for it

Fuel for the boat (boat)

a) Motor engine

b) Battery/ Accu

1 Unit

1 Unit

1000,000 IDR

200,000 IDR

Self-help society

Self-help society

Fridge to fish a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

- Unit

- Unit

--

Self-help society

Self-help society

Electricity to stall

a) Generator

b) Battery/ Accu

3 Unit

- Unit

500,000 IDR

-

Self-help society

Self-help society

5. Energy needs for small businesses

 Energy Access Index for Village Level :

In accordance with the above criteria, that the Enggros village have Energy Access  

Household Fuels - 2 For cooking purpose, most people collect firewood from the forest around their settlements.

Mechanical Power - 1 Lack of education facilities and community education levels are generally low, resulting in the absence of mecanical power.

Electricity - 3 Most of people they have low-voltage DC access for their home application.

Overview & Evaluation of Existing Pro-poor Policies & Measures

Policies/Programs Policy objectives Implementation

Policy objective likely to be achieved

Impact on poor

NATIONAL LEVEL : Main obj. Secondary obj. To-date Future Yes /

No

Subsidy for Household electricity use up to 900 kWh/month (30% cheaper)

To lower the cost of electricity for the poor people

To keep household energy use low (below 900 kWh/month)

Fully implemented

Need to be continued

Yes - Poor communities with access to electricity have low costs for electricity

- Because of cheap electricity new houses are cheap

- Poor communities without electricity do not benefit from this policy

Subsidy for LPG To convert kerosene use to use of LPG

There is more supply of gas and it is a more efficient fuel

In Papua subsidized LPG is not yet available

Maybe not because of bad safety track record

No No impact because the policy is not yet implemented in Papua.

Removal of subsidy for Fuel Oil (BBM)

For subsidy funds most to be used for social purposes, e.g : for education, health and poverty alleviation

It leads to saving of fuel utilization

In fact that the policy impact only felt by the rich people, because only those who consume the most fuel, specially for vehicle fuel

There needs to be further studies to evaluate this policy

Yes No direct impact

PROVINCIAL LEVEL Main obj. Secondary obj. To-date Future Yes /

No Impact on poor

Kampung mandiri terang (“the shine of the villages”)Part of RE program of Papua province.Survey Investigation Design in villages across the province (program od Dinas Energy since 2005) to identify the energy potential in the village. The Dinas Energy choosed the villages with high solar potential and distributes (for free) solar panels to households.

To identify best energy solution for local people (100 villages/year)

To improve the quality of life of rural community

Probably not fully achieved

Not likely because of conflict of interest, low population density, no strict supervision of implementation

Maybe over a long period of

time ?

- Limited success in improving the energy situation of some villages

- It provides some villages electricity for lighting

Some activities have been done after the meeting in Mataram, among others:

June 10th 2011, meeting with Head of Mining and Energy Department Papua Province.

June 14th 2011, meeting with BAPPEDA Papua Province.

June 21st 2011, meeting with Head of State Electricity Company (PLN) Papua Province.

June 22nd 2011, meeting with Head of Infrastructure Management Agency Papua Province.

June 30th 2011, Stake-holders meeting in ASTON Hotel, Jayapura.

Internal coordination and discussion with other TWG, regarding the data that has been obtained, every Saturday morning.

The results of several meetings that have been done :

To carry out the implementation of energy policies issued by the government, each agency or institution has its own program, but unfortunately there is no integration with each other.

After hearing and seeing (Stake-holders meeting on June 30, 2011) the results of our exposure, particularly on Casindo programs, all of them agreed that the Casindo program very necessary to be continued and developed in an integrated and sustainable. For that, some of them agreed to bring us to the governor.

PREPARE TO DRAFT REPORTChapter 1Introduction

CASINDO & TWG VPeriod and duration of researchDescription of objectives and approaches

Chapter 2Overview & evaluation of existing pro-poor policies & measures National Regional Local level

Chapter 3Selected target location Selection criteria and process Description of demographic, economic and energy situation of selected community & whole province

Chapter 4Energy needs assessment Approach used to assess energy-related needs and priorities Identified energy problems (supply-related, information void, awareness, energy devices etc.)

 Chapter 5 Proposed policy measures that address the identified energy needs Policy measures that address identified energy problems Stakeholder consultation (community, local government, local energy businesses, local NGOs) Pro-poor energy strategy

Chapter 6Conclusions Necessary follow up activities Policy recommendation to local government Policy recommendations to regional government General recommendations for national pro-poor strategy

 

Thank You For Your Attention