WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT · mapapabilis ang proseso na hindi na nahihirapan. We have here homeowners associations, hindi ko po alam kung may urban poor ... sa pag-follow-up, pagkuha

Page | 1

WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT

DURING my time, there will be no demolition kapag walang relocation. Hindi ako papayag. Kasi ‘yung walang mapuntahan, sirain mo ang bahay. Parang aso.

Eh, saan pupunta ‘yung mga tao? Where will they find another shelter? But I would be very generous to them. I’d look for money, ‘yung lahat na gusto nating

gamitin. We will go for a suitable relocation and that is why itong mga bagong papasok, we have to build new industries. We have to create an activity, economics, or otherwise, para may pupuntahan sila.

Excerpt from the speech of His Excellency Rodrigo Roa Duterte, President of the Republic of the Philippines, at

the Reunion and Fellowship of Bedans Batches ’71 and ’72 with nationwide legal coordinators at Heroes Hall,

Malacañang Palace, on July 17, 2016

Page | 2

WORD FROM THE VICE PRESIDENT

THANK you all for coming together to discuss the problem of shelter, especially for those who are at the periphery of society. Iyong mga tinatawag nating nasa laylayan ng lipunan, iyon po ang pangunahin nating tinutulungan ngayon.

Some of you here come home every night to a house that is essentially an articulation of your life’s accomplishments, a home that reminds you that you have done well, a space where you can be yourself and be safe and secure with your loved ones.

Tayo pong may inuuwian nang tahimik na natutulog gabi-gabi, napakaswerte po natin.

But more than 5.56 million families in the Philippines don’t enjoy that basic need. Ang atin pong homeless ngayon sa Pilipinas ay estimated to be at 5.6 million families, napakarami po.

There are many here within the sound of my voice who are still living in informal

settler communities in urban areas, in the path of floods, along esteros, and in disaster zones. Those who live in rural areas are in the path of typhoons, mired in poverty and hopelessness.

Alam po ninyo noong pumasok po ako sa HUDCC chair, iyon po ang hinaharap nating

sitwasyon. Nakakapanlumo po na marami sa ating mga kababayan, kahit po alam na hindi safe

ang lugar at napakadelikado, basta lang may matitirahan ay nakikipagsapalaran na. At iyon po ang ayaw nating mangyari.

Giving you the means to provide not just a good home for your families but also livable communities where you can thrive and be your most productive self is a job that cannot be done by the government alone. Because this is a job for all of us.

Page | 3

Kaya po ang ganitong event spearheaded by our progressive, local government leaders, in partnership with the private sector, civil society, homeowners, the national government and all those who have a stake in the issue of housing is a sign that we are about to see results.

Alam ninyo po, kinukwento ko kay Mayor kanina, that this is the first time na

magkakaroon ng partnership na sabay-sabay.

Ang isang LGU, Habitat for Humanity at HUDCC are all coming together to solve the issue in shelter and housing.

Sabi ko kay Mayor, tama po ang partner na nahanap ninyo. Ang Habitat for Humanity isa sa pinaka-reliable, talagang maaasahan na partner ng housing dito sa ating bansa.

And, importante pong maging successful ang ating partnership because if this

becomes successful, we hope to replicate this in many other local government units for their housing.

In GenSan, it looks like the ingredients are all coming together for the development of a city that the rest of the country can emulate. Napakahalaga po na [unintelligible].

Before coming here, galing na po kami ni Mayor sa kabila, mayroon din po siya doon na Education Summit. Pagpapakita na this is really a recognition na government cannot help solve the problems of society alone -- the government has to partner with the partner sector to be able to collaborate with them to solve the problems in our country.

The process of consultation and participation is often messy, tiresome, and yes, sometimes expensive. But I learned that before this Summit, you have embraced the idea of bringing together homeowners associations, private developers, government agencies, and other stakeholders.

Alam ninyo po, napakarami po kasi sa gobyerno, sasabihin tayo naman ang hinalal ng

tao, tayo na lang mag-usap-usap. Kaya bihira po ang LGU na kahit sila na ang nahalal, talagang every step of the way, sinasali pa din sa lahat ng usapin ang lahat ng stakeholders.

Ang paniniwala po natin, the best solutions para sa ating mga problema ay nandoon,

at dumadaan mismo sa problemang iyon. And most importantly, the city office has been at the center of all of these events. To me, the results of your consultative process are very impressive.

I also learned that the city office has allocated P30 million this year to buy 10 hectares

of land that will be used for development of communities that can house 700 families. Pinapagaan ninyo po ang trabaho namin sa HUDCC. Kasi pag minsan po mayroon

kaming mga programa para sa pabahay, pero wala namang available na tatayuan. Pero dito po, talagang walking the talk ang ating LGU. Hindi pa man kinakailangan, nagla-land-banking na, para pag kinakailangan mayroon na kaagad magagamit. An innovation that is really close to my heart.

Page | 4

Nabasa ko po ito sa background ng programa ng city government, is your LGU’s plan to build rental housing for fisherfolk. Alam ninyo po, isa sa pinakamahirap na sector ng ating lipunan ang ating mga mangingisda sa matagal na matagal na panahon, bago pa lang naman po akong politiko.

Naging politiko po akong noong 2013 lang nang mamatay ang asawa ko. Bago po ako

naging politiko, isa po akong abugado para sa mahihirap. Ang amin pong tinutulungan, ang sector ng mangingisda.

Kaya noong naging HUDCC chair ako, isa sa mga pangunahing gusto nating asikasuhin

ay pabahay para sa mga mangingisda dahil isa talaga sila sa mga pinaka-kawawang sector lalo na pagdating sa pabahay.

We also learned that with help from Habitat for Humanity, the city office and its

partners would package projects to access the housing programs of SHFC, Pag-IBIG and NHMFC.

The HUDCC has committed to facilitate more than 3,600 units under SHFC, 4,788 units

under Pag-IBIG, and 4,788 units under NHMFC. The HUDCC is also working on a joint circular with DAR, LRA, and BIR to address choke points affecting land conversion, titling, tax exemption to facilitate access to land for socialized housing.

Kaunting kuwento lang po. Alam ninyo po, mula nang nahalal ako bilang HUDCC chair,

isa po sa unang binisita ko ang mga biktima ng Sendong at Yolanda. Ang Sendong po mas nauna pa sa Yolanda, pero ang Yolanda 3 years ago na.

Pero pag bisita ko po doon sa housing para sa biktima, marami pa pong hindi

nagagawa. At hindi po iyon dahil sa korapsyon. Iyon po ay dahil napakahaba ng proseso para mabigyan ng pabahay ang isang mahirap na pamilya. Kaya galing sa pagbisita sa mga communities na ito, kinausap ko po ang ating Pangulo.

Sabi ko, Mr. President, baka po puwede na nating ipatawag nang sabay-sabay ang BIR,

COA, NHA, etc. at mag-usap po kami sabay-sabay kung paano mapapadali ang proseso. Kasi alam ninyo po, ang ating backlog ay 5.6 million houses ngayon. Pero ang nagagawa po nating pabahay, mga 200,000 a year lang para sa mahihirap. Kung patuloy po ang ganito, pagkatapos ng term namin ni Pangulong Duterte, lalong lolobo ang ating backlog. Kasi napakahina po ng pag-produce ng mga pabahay. Kaya po ngayon hinahanapan po natin ng paraan kung papano mapapabilis ang proseso na hindi na nahihirapan.

We have here homeowners associations, hindi ko po alam kung may urban poor

associations dito. Pero very common pong kwento sa ating mga associations, ang tagal na po nilang nagko-contribute, pero ang kino-contribute nila napupunta lang sa pagpoproseso ng papeles.

Imbes na ang contribution napupunta na para sa mga pabahay, lahat po ito napupunta

sa pag-follow-up, pagkuha ng mga documentary requirements. Para iyong kakaunting resources natin mapupunta na po talaga sa paghulog sa bahay. Gusto po nating madaliin iyong sa proseso para sa inyong lahat.

Page | 5

These may all sound like simple numbers, but to me, each unit brings to mind one

more family living in better conditions. Kaya po sinasabi ko dati, kasi marami din po akong nabisitang mga pabahay, nandoon

nga ho ang bahay, pero may mga bahay na hindi naman maayos ang pagkagawa. Mayroong mga bahay na napakalayo naman sa lugar ng pagtatrabahuan.

Mayroon akong binisita, maganda nga ang bahay, wala namang tubig o kuryente. Kaya

sabi po natin sa ating mga ahensiya, ang sukat natin ng success ng programa natin, hindi sa number of houses na nagagawa natin. Ang sukat ay kung nababago ba natin para sa kabutihan ang pagkakaroon ng pabahay sa isang pamilya. Kaya ngayon po, babaguhin natin lahat ng sukat.

What’s more, your city is now providing security of tenure to resettled families by

facilitating individual land titles. And further signifying that shelter is your city’s priority, GenSan has something that not all LGUs have… pero ang council report, naku, hirap na hirap na po kami sa HUDCC para pilitin ang ibang mga LGUs na magkaroon ng local housing report. Pero meron po kayo dito sa GenSan City Housing and Land Management Office, an office that not all LGUs have. Kapag mayroon po kayong ganitong opisina, masisiguro po and an assurance that there is a particular office that will take care of your housing needs.

See how consultation and participation creates results that matter on the ground? Let

me personally congratulate all of you who have made this happen. From the city government to the shelter agencies to the homeowners’ associations and the private sector. In behalf of all those at the periphery of society who will benefit from the beautiful communities you will create, thank you from the bottom of my heart.

My gratitude also goes to Habitat for Humanity for supporting these endeavors. Gaya

po ng sinabi ko kanina, wala pa po ako sa opisinang ito, ang Habitat for Humanity has been a very able partner of government and private sector in making our dreams of owning our own homes come true.

The private sector, aid agencies, and other partners bring so much more than

resources to the table. You bring experience, expertise, and goodwill. The Memorandum of Understanding to be signed by HUDCC and Habitat today is but a formalization of such goodwill already enjoyed on both fronts. Thank you all for being part of our efforts to provide shelter to our people.

Nakakalampas pa lang po kami ng 100 days in office. Ang 100 days namin October 8,

ngayon ay 109 days in office na po kami. Inip na inip po talaga kami to move faster lalo na sa pabahay. Kung hindi talaga bibilisan, hindi instant ang results.

Every week bumibisita kami sa pinakamalalayong lugar para makita ang pinakabuod

ng mga problema ng ating barangay. The faces and voices of the poor we have visited indicate that every day of delay causes them to suffer further.

Page | 6

Ito po ang problema natin. Dito po sa Mindanao, dahil napakalayo, pag minsan hindi na napapakinggan ang mga pangangailangan. Kaya ngayon po, binabaliktad natin. Imbes na kayo ang pupunta sa Maynila, kami po ang pupunta sa inyo para lalo po naming marinig at bigyan kayo ng boses at marinig ang inyong mga hinaing. At hindi lang po marinig, makita rin po mismo namin kung ano ang kalagayan.

Araw-araw na patatrabaho namin, araw-araw po naming sinusubukan matugunan ang

inyong pangangailangan. Our work has revolved around addressing institutional problems in HUDCC in performing its mandate.

Ngayon po, collaboration is already the key. Nare-realize po naming as HUDCC hindi

po namin kaya gawin na kami lang. Kailangan po lahat ng ahensiya sa amin katulad ng Pag-IBIG, NHA, etc., lahat po iyon kailangan magtulung-tulong. Pero kahit kami-kami po hindi din sapat. Kaya po ang local government nandito, iyong private sector, Habitat for Humanity, homeowners’ association, at NGOs pagtutulung-tulungan po natin lahat para po madala ang lahat ng pangangailangan sa atin.

Kaya ngayon pong umaga, I would like to thank and congratulate the city government of GenSan for initiating and spearheading this event and for creating the housing office of the city that will take care of the shelter needs of our constituents.

Pinapasalamatan ko din po ang Habitat for Humanity for being very active and very

able partner of the government. At lahat po ng homeowners associations, LGUs for all coming together and finding the solution for the shelter problems of the people of GenSan.

Asahan po ninyo na nandito lang ang aming opisina para makinig sa inyong mga

pangangailangan. Maraming salamat po uli.

Speech of Vice President Maria Leonor "Leni" Santo Tomas Robredo at the General Santos City Housing Summit,

KCC & Convention Center, General Santos City, 27 October 2016

Page | 7

REPORT OF THE GENERAL MANAGER

2016 was a memorable year for me as the new President, Rodrigo R. Duterte, tapped me in

July to call the shots for the National Housing Authority. I was honored, at the same time

inspired, by the Chief Executive’s gesture of appointing me as General Manager of the

Authority since this might be truly an opportunity at the right time to help the government

show its compassion for the poor. Rest assured that the trust and confidence given by the

President will bear fruits for both the NHA and the people it serves.

Also that year, the NHA marked its 41st year of committed service of providing

adequate, safe and affordable shelters to homeless and low-income families.

Year 2016 saw the Authority implemented a total of 522 projects with 105,825 units

in housing starts and 94,895 units in housing completions/assistance with a funding of

P63.406 billion. Some 313 new projects were targeted to be started during that year with

corresponding housing starts of 167,102 units while at the end of the year another 160 new

projects were started (51% of target) which generated 105,825 housing starts (63% of target),

of which 72,428 units (68%) were already on ground while the remaining 33,397 units (32%)

were awarded and about to be started on site.

The planned contribution to the annual target was 97% Housing Units (131,676 units),

21% Housing Materials Assistance (HOMA, 34,660 units), and 766 units Other Housing

Assistance. However, the actual contribution to the 2016 housing starts of 105,825 units

Page | 8

consisted of 62% Housing Units (65,998 units), 37% HOMA (39,061), and 1% Other Housing

Assistance (766 units).

On the Housing Completions/Assistance, a total of 445 projects was targeted to

generate 163,262 units but only 51% of the target (228 projects) was able to report

completion of 94,895 units (58% of target) by the end of the year, although there were 29,089

units reported by the operating units as under various stages of completion.

Some specific reasons that affected the realization of those targets were

developer/contractor-related, site condition, revision of plans, reduction of units to be

generated, delayed compliance of operating units, projects dropped, shortage of construction

materials, delayed project packaging, other agency-related and LGU-related issues, change of

site, transition of administration, failure in bidding, inclement weather condition and peace

and order situation, among others.

The NHA also recorded numerous accomplishments in 2016 such as the completion of

the North-South Railway Project (NSRP) design standards and cost estimates which was used

in the preparation of the 2017 work program; the continuous implementation of the

Constructor’s Performance Evaluation System (CPES) and training of project managers and

technical staff on contracts management and works engineering; the holding of hands-on

trainings on new technologies to improve supervision skills and quality of work;

orientation/trainings on site selection and site planning; the conduct of Capability-Building

Program (LGU-CAP) for 83 LGUs in the Yolanda Corridor with the participants given adequate

assistance in the formulation of their Relocation and Resettlement Assistance Program (RRAP)

with emphasis on the creation and operationalization of their Local Inter-Agency Committees

(LIACs); and the approval of the Rationalization Plan by the Governance Commission for

Government-Owned or –Controlled Corporations (GCG).

Going to the sales and disposition, the NHA targeted 77,734 units worth P19.559

billion to be sold in that year, however, 33,173 units were sold with sales value of P5.462

billion. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional (CII) units performed well at 139% versus its

annual target while Residential Units posted 43% of the target.

On the other hand, the Authority’s total collection for the year of P3.369 billion

accounted for 94% of the annual target (P3.590 billion). It consisted of collections from

residential accounts of 1.049 billion (31%) and CII accounts amounting to P2.320 billion (63%)

Throughout 2016, the NHA continued its commitment to provide decent, safe, and

resilient shelters for informal settler families (ISFs) living along danger areas in Metro Manila,

calamity victims, conflict-affected individuals, and resettlement program beneficiaries.

Page | 9

NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY 2016 PERFORMANCE REPORT I. SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE

1.1 CORPORATE PERFORMANCE

Table 1: Summary of 2016 Performance vs. Board Approved Work Program

Key Result Area Target Accomp. Target Accomp.

(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4)

Projects Implemented 664 522 79 494 516 104

New Works 313 160 51 219 234 107

Carry-over Works 351 362 103 275 282 103

Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 167,102 105,825 63 99,647 121,836 122

Completions 163,262 94,895 58 124,185 93,770 76

New Works 50,965 44,498 87 44,746 35,157 79

Carry-over Works 112,297 50,397 45 79,439 58,613 74

Sales and Disposition

Units 77,734 33,173 43 58,048 48,017 83

Value (PB) 19.559 5.462 28 13.303 13.366 100

Collection (PB) 3.590 3.369 94 2.651 3.490 132

Budget (PB)

Funds Raised 98.691 81.999 83 70.088 81.431 116

Funds Obligated 81.999 67.863 83 81.431 68.184 84

% vs.

Target

2016 2015

% vs.

Target

1.2 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Table 2: Summary of 2016 Financial Highlights (P Billion)

PB %

Particulars (1) (2) (3=1-2) (4=3/2)

Total Revenue 1.663 1.524 0.139 9

Surplus/(Deficit) before Subsidy 0.327 0.334 (0.007) (2)

Net Income after Subsidy 10.509 11.034 (0.525) (5)

Assets 117.443 105.112 12.331 12

Liabilities 16.516 15.687 0.829 5

Equity 100.927 89.425 11.502 13

Increase

2016 2015

Page | 10

II. HOUSING PRODUCTION/ASSISTANCE In 2016, a total of 522 projects with 105,825 units in housing starts and 94,895 units in housing completions/assistance was implemented by NHA. Total funding for these projects amounted to P63.406 Billion. 2.1 Housing Starts. Some 313 new projects were targeted to be started within

the year with corresponding housing starts of 167,102 units (total number of units/units of assistance to be generated by the projects). At the end of the year, 160 new projects were started (51% of target) which generated 105,825 housing starts (63% of target).

Of the 105,825 housing starts, 72,428 units (68%) were already on-ground while the remaining 33,397 units (32%) were awarded and about to be started on site.

Table 3: Housing Starts by Program

No. of No. of No. of

Program Projects Starts Projects Starts Projects Starts

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5=3/1) (6=4/2)

GRAND-TOTAL 313 167,102 160 105,825 51 63

SUB-TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 291 131,676 139 65,998 48 50

SUB-TOTAL REGULAR PRODUCTION 115 33,958 63 19,853 55 58

Housing Program for ISFs Living 23 14,597 16 11,268 70 77

Along Danger Areas

in Metro Manila

In-City 9 3,858 3 1,710 33 44

Off-City 14 10,739 13 9,558 93 89

Regular Resettlement 75 13,508 41 6,596 55 49

For ISFs Affected by Infrastructure 7 2,863 7 1,490 100 52

Projects in Metro Manila and Those

Living Along Danger Areas in

Nearby Provinces

Regional Resettlement 68 10,645 34 5,106 50 48

Settlements Upgrading 8 1,245 2 209 25 17

AFP/PNP Housing 7 3,954 4 1,780 57 45

Low-Rise Buildings (JV) 2 654 0 0 0 0

HOUSING PROGRAM FOR CALAMITY 176 97,718 76 46,145 43 47

VICTIMS - PERMANENT HOUSING

Typhoon Sendong 1 879 0 0 0 0

Typhoon Yolanda 172 95,388 73 44,694 42 47

Typhoon Lando 2 534 2 534 100 100

Zamboanga Conflict 1 917 1 917 100 100

HOUSING MATERIALS ASSISTANCE 21 34,660 20 39,061 95 113

OTHER HOUSING ASSISTANCE 1 766 1 766 100 100

Target Accomplishment % vs. Target

Page | 11

2.1.1 The planned contribution to the annual target was as follows: 79% Housing

Units (131,676 units), 21% Housing Materials Assistance (HOMA, 34,660

units), and 766 units Other Housing Assistance. However, the actual

contribution to the 2016 housing starts of 105,825 units consisted of 62%

Housing Units (65,998 units), 37% HOMA (39,061 units), and 1% Other

Housing Assistance (766 units).

2.1.2 The 17% difference in the actual contribution of Housing Units to starts

accomplishment versus its planned contribution to the annual target can be

attributed to the low performance levels across all programs with the exception

of Calamity Programs-Typhoon Lando and Zamboanga Conflict, which

registered 100% accomplishment of respective targets (534 units and 917

units) and Off-City Housing Program for ISFs Living along Danger Areas in

Metro Manila which recorded an 89% performance level. Likewise, targeted

projects under Low-Rise Buildings (Joint Venture) and Calamity Program-

Typhoon Sendong were not started.

2.1.3 In summary, the issues that affected new works and the corresponding housing

starts which were not generated are shown in the table below:

Table 4: Summary of Issues (New Works)

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

TOTAL

165

72,292

INTERNAL ISSUES

14

4,869

Reduction in units to be generated

Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger

Areas in MM (Off-City)

Housing Program for Calamity Victims

- Typhoon Yolanda

AFP/PNP Housing Program

4

2

1

1

2,072

822

750

500

Developer/contractor-related

- Contractor failed to mobilize


2

1,250

Revision of plans

- For compliance to the requirements/ findings of Housing Technology Development Office (HTDO)

- Portion of project proposal has no/missing title


Areas in MM (In-City)

Settlements Upgrading

2

1

1

921

780

141

Delayed compliance of Operating Units to

the new requirements of the Department of

Budget of Management (DBM) on the

release of Special Allotment Release Order

(SARO)

Regional Resettlement 4 406

Manpower (delayed compliance to findings

due to pressing work commitments and

limited personnel)



1 120

Delayed project packaging Regional Resettlement 1 100

Page | 12

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

EXTERNAL ISSUES

151

67,423

No offers Housing Program for Calamity Victims

- Typhoon Yolanda

91 41,995

Other agency-related - Awaiting issuance of Environmental

Compliance Certificate (ECC) by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)

- Failure of landowner/partner to turn-over documents (plans, technical specifications, others)

- Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) not amenable to the additional funds for the project

- Delayed issuance of title in the name of LGU

- Absence of Implementing Rules and Regulations from the Department of Information and Communication Technology (DICT)

Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda

Housing Program for ISFs Affected by Infrastructure Projects in MM & Those Living along Danger Areas in Nearby Provinces Regional Resettlement

Regional Resettlement Settlements Upgrading

14 10

1

1

1

1

8,851 7,228

1,033

355

132

103

LGU-related

- Delayed submission of documents by LGU

- Mayor set as a pre-condition the provision of additional funds from the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) for community facilities

- Moratorium imposed by the receiving LGU

- Change in LGU administration - Request of the Congressman for DPWH

to implement the project instead of the City

- LGU land with legal issue

- Change in housing design by LGU to accommodate more units

Regional Resettlement


- Typhoon Sendong - Typhoon Yolanda Settlements Upgrading

Low-Rise Building (JV)

Housing Program for ISFs Affected by

Infrastructure Projects in MM & Those Living

along Danger Areas in Nearby Provinces










33

23

19

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

3

1

1

1

1

7,128

4,555

3,165

966

879

87

250

174

792

540

516

325

180

120

100

Page | 13

- Insistence of the LGU to treat the project as a grant instead of recoverable

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

Land issues

- No titles available

- Change of site


- Typhoon Yolanda


6

4

2

4,192

3,153

1,039

Reduction in units from planned to actual

configuration on site


- Typhoon Yolanda




3,392

3,197

195

Transition of administration



4

3

1

812

700

112

Failure in bidding




2

1

1

573

408

165

Resistance of daycare operator to vacate the

area affecting the site development plan

Low Rise Building (JV)

1 480

A total of 165 projects was not implemented for the year affecting 68,900

housing starts. In addition, there were 3,392 units which were affected by the

reduction in units from planned to actual configuration on site, for a total of

72,292 housing starts not generated for the year.

Under the HOMA, some 6,813 targeted units were not started as there were no

endorsements/proposals received from the LGUs.

The housing starts by Program and AMO/Region versus 2016 targets are shown in Annexes A and A1.

2.2 Housing Completions/Assistance. A total of 445 projects was targeted to

generate 163,262 units of housing completions/assistance in 2016. By yearend, only 228 projects (51% of target) were able to report completions of 94,895 units (58% of target). Aside from the 94,895 housing completions/assistance accomplished for the year, there were 29,089 units reported by the operating units as under various stages of completion.

Page | 14

Table 5: Housing Completions/Assistance by Status of Development

No. of Comple- No. of Comple- No. of Comple-

Status of Development Projs. tions Projs. tions Projs. tions

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5=3/1) (6=4/2)

TOTAL 445 163,262 228 94,895 51 58

New Works 94 50,965 41 44,498 44 87

Carry-over Works 351 112,297 187 50,397 53 45


2.2.1 The 94,895 housing completions/assistance for the year were generated from

41 new projects (44,498 units or 47%) and 187 carryover projects (50,397 units or 53%), with new projects accomplishing 87% of its target and carry-over projects, 45%.

2.2.2 With the non-implementation/non-start of 165 new projects mentioned under

Section 2.1.3, 11,650 targeted housing units-completions were not generated in 2016. Also, under the HOMA, 6,813 targeted units were not generated with the non-endorsements/non-receipt of proposals from the LGUs.

Meanwhile, the variance under carry-over projects was due to the projects with no reported completions within the year and projects which reported partial completion of target, as shown the table below:

Table 6: Summary of Issues (Carry-Over Works)

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

TOTAL

176

67,932

INTERNAL ISSUES

87

31,772

Developer/contractor-related

- Slow implementation by developer

- Insufficient equipment and manpower deployment on site/funding constraints of developer


- Typhoon Yolanda - Typhoon Sendong - Typhoon Pablo AFP/PNP Housing Program





- Typhoon Yolanda


Areas in MM

- In-City - Off-City

42

22

12

5

1

6

4

1

5

10

3

5

3

2

15,041

6,595

3,452

1,931

1,180

341

1,585

832

726

4,501

2,663

1,403

1,140

263

Page | 15

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

- Ongoing compliance to documentary

requirements

- Ongoing rectification of works by the contractor

- Internal conflict within the firm

- Award cancelled due to non-compliance with requirements of award

Housing Program for ISFs Affected by Infrastructure Projects in MM & Those Living along Danger Areas in Nearby Provinces Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda AFP/PNP Housing Program Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement

2

7

1

1

1

1

435

2,385

944 743 201

424

192

Site condition

- Quantity of earthworks much higher and require longer period of earthworks, double handling of materials due to narrow access road leading to the project/heavy equipment cannot pass through, absence of final scheme of site development due to ROW issues, with variation order due to existence of waterways, unbuildable portions, property with environmental and boundary issues, steep slope and honeycomb walls, ECC cancelled/site within the network of a protected areas for agricultural and agro-industrial zone

- Obstruction on Right of Way (ROW), presence of informal settlers


- Typhoon Yolanda


17

16

1

6,880

6,822

58

Revision of plans


- Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement

6

4

2

5,067

4,826

241

Reduction in units to be generated


- Typhoon Yolanda






15

5

6

1

2

1

3,013

883

607

500

220

53

Page | 16

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

Delayed compliance of operating units to

the new requirements of DBM on the

release on SARO




- Typhoon Yolanda - Zamboanga Conflict

5

1

2

2

1

1

1,187

800

312

75

41

34

Projects dropped Housing Program for Calamity Victims

- Typhoon Yolanda

2 584

EXTERNAL ISSUES

89

36,160

Inclement weather condition


- Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement

13

10

3

10,424

10,006

418

LGU-related - Delayed compliance to requirements,

delayed bidding by LGU, no land in the name of LGU, project for termination due to unresolved issue on the removal/relocation of electric posts outside the project by LGU, re-alignment of existing concrete road/ongoing development of access road by LGU, LGU has no funds to front-end for the project, change in LGU administration, filling and riprapping works care of LGU)

- Delayed approval of development permit/licenses, LGU won't allow the passage of heavy equipment and trucks with heavy loads through the 2 bridges going to the project site delaying the delivery of construction materials

- Slow implementation by LGU - Revision of subdivision plan as

requested by the mayor, to suit the drainage outfall ROW by the LGU

- Erroneous topo plans provided by the

LGU

Regional Resettlement Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger Areas in MM (In-City)

35 19

4

7 6 1

3 1 2

2

7,703 2,511

1,947

1,709 1,173

536

960 592 368

576

Shortage of construction materials Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda - Zamboanga Conflict

12 10

2

5,017 4,571

446

Page | 17

Other agency-related

- Delayed issuance of permits/licenses/ clearances



- Typhoon Yolanda - Typhoon Sendong

8

3

2

1

1

4,854

1,518

1,050

468

69

399

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

- Delay in the energization of individual power and water service connections, absorptive capability of LEYECO to undertake installation of electrical facilities

- CPDO is requiring the construction of expensive RCDG bridge instead of RCBC bridge (as per contract) as a requirement for the issuance of development permit

- Awaiting approval of subdivision plan by DENR

- Projects suspended due to non-

issuance of ECC by DENR

- Suspended due to the Ombudsman investigation involving filling materials

- Developer's dispute with NGCP on the encroachment of transmission lines' right-of-way into the project is yet to be resolved. Title of portions of the project within the disputed area is yet to be transferred in NHAs name

Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger Areas in MM (Off-City) Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda AFP/PNP Housing Program Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda Regional Resettlement Regional Resettlement Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1,043 643

400

770

500

362 199 163

343

318

Land-related - Change of site

- Developer withdrew proposal due to land acquisition dispute, Notice of Award cancelled due to lot claimants, landowner withdrew, problem on TCT

- No available site

Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Typhoon Yolanda AFP/PNP Housing Program


- AFP/PNP Housing Program

9 3 2

1

5

1

3,864 1,759 1,035

724

1,704

401

Page | 18

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

Site condition - Developer cannot proceed with housing

construction on a large portion of the project due to presence of massive hard rocks which delay land development, revision of plans to suit actual site condition, boundary issue, project suspended due to rehabilitation of access road,

- With Cease and Desist order issued by the LGU due to soil erosion affecting portion of the project site along the boundary of the adjacent subdivision

- Project suspended due to existing

transitory site which is obstructing the layout of the units

- One building affected by road widening

was re-designed/reduced from 36 to 24 units


Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger Areas in MM (In-City) Housing Program for Calamity Victims - Zamboanga Conflict Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger Areas in MM (Off-City)

5 4

1

3,132 2,492

596

32

12

Peace and order situation Regional Resettlement 4 605

Lack of applicants, LGU requested suspension of the project due to non-occupancy of completed units

AFP/PNP Housing Program 2 535

Reduction in units from planned to actual configuration on site

Regional Resettlement 1 26

Page | 19

2.2.3 The summary of housing completions by program is shown in the table below:

Table 7: Housing Completions/Assistance by Program

No. of Comple- No. of Comple- No. of Comple-

Program Projects tions Projects tions Projects tions

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5=3/1) (6=4/2)

GRAND-TOTAL 445 163,262 228 94,895 51 58

SUB-TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 407 115,145 191 42,362 47 37

SUB-TOTAL REGULAR PRODUCTION 213 43,826 85 16,860 40 38

Housing Program for ISFs Living 37 18,095 23 8,933 62 49

Along Danger Areas

in Metro Manila

In-City 16 5,824 9 2,848 56 49

Off-City 21 12,271 14 6,085 67 50

Regular Resettlement 140 16,101 42 3,519 30 22

For ISFs Affected by Infrastructure 5 742 5 570 100 77

Projects in Metro Manila and Those

Living Along Danger Areas in

Nearby Provinces

Regional Resettlement 135 15,359 37 2,949 27 19

Settlements Upgrading 5 420 9 2,560 180 610

AFP/PNP Housing 30 9,128 11 1,848 37 20

Low-Rise Buildings (JV) 1 82 0 0 0 0

HOUSING PROGRAM FOR CALAMITY 194 71,319 106 25,502 55 36

VICTIMS - PERMANENT HOUSING

Typhoon Sendong 5 2,258 2 115 40 5

Typhoon Pablo 6 341 1 34 17 10

Typhoon Yolanda 170 66,386 95 24,065 56 36

Typhoon Lando 2 534 0 0 0 0

Zamboanga Conflict 11 1,800 8 1,288 73 72

HOUSING MATERIALS ASSISTANCE 37 47,351 36 51,767 97 109

OTHER HOUSING ASSISTANCE 1 766 1 766 100 100


2.2.4 Similar to housing starts, majority of the annual target under housing completions comprised of Housing Units (71% or 115,145 units) and 29% HOMA (47,351 units). The 2016 accomplishment of 94,895 housing completions consisted of 45% Housing Units (42,362 units), 54% HOMA (51,767 units) and 1% Other Housing Assistance (766 units). This was due to the underperformance among all the programs with the exception of Settlements Upgrading which surpassed its annual target (610%) given the unprogrammed accomplishments reported from the National Capital Region and Mindanao areas, and Off-City Housing Program for ISFs Affected by Infrastructure Projects in Metro Manila and those Living along Danger Areas in Nearby Provinces and Calamity Program-Zamboanga Conflict, which managed to accomplish their targets (77% and 72%, respectively). Moreover, there were no reported completions from projects under Low-Rise Buildings (JV) and Calamity Housing-Typhoon Lando.

Page | 20

The housing completions by Program and AMO/Region versus 2016 targets are shown in Annexes B and B1.

2.3 To support operations, the following new guidelines were issued in 2016:

• NHA Standard Housing Models Design Manual. This is a design manual and compilation of NHA housing typologies to be used as reference for project operations for better understanding of good construction by NHA staff including those who are non-technical.

• Guidelines for Construction Using Accreditation of Innovative Technologies for Housing (AITECH) Accredited-New Technologies. The new technologies were adopted in projects under Yolanda and Low-Rise Buildings (LRBs).

• Guidelines for the Disbursement of the 2015 Interim Shelter Fund under the Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger Areas in Metro Manila.

• Adherence to the Community Empowerment Program in Housing Development and Prescribing the Stewardship and Procedures in its Implementation. This guidelines is an affirmation of NHA’s commitment to social preparation, peoples’ participation and community building which is being challenged by the Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP) and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs).

• Guidelines on the Implementation of the Community Based Shelter and Livelihood Program (CBSL). This is an initiative to mainstream gender and development and multi-stakeholders participation in planning and implementation of NHA’s housing programs.

• Guidelines for Customer Feedback Mechanism for Livelihood and Affordability Enhancement Programs.

• Four-Year (2016-2019) Corporate Learning and Development Plan which covers trainings for personnel across all the key result areas of NHA.

• Implementing Guidelines for the Directors and Officers Liability Fund (DOLF).

The NHA also accomplished the following in 2016:

• Completion of the North-South Railway Project (NSRP) design standards and cost estimates which was used in the preparation of the 2017 work program.

• Continuous implementation of the Constructors’ Performance Evaluation System (CPES) and training of project managers and technical staff on contracts management and works engineering to improve construction management and create awareness of concerned staff in the proper construction methodology and procedures in the conduct of CPES.

• Conduct of hands-on trainings on new technologies to improve supervision skills and quality of work.

Page | 21

• Orientation/trainings on site selection and site planning. The guidelines which was issued in 2015 was used as reference in the preparation of Terms of Reference (TORs) of different housing programs.

• Conduct of Capability-Building Program (LGU-CAP) for 83 LGUs in the Yolanda Corridor with the LGU participants given adequate assistance in the formulation of their Relocation and Resettlement Assistance Program (RRAP) with emphasis on the creation and operationalization of their Local Inter-agency Agency Committees (LIACs). The LGUs were also assisted in identifying and streamlining their activities and next steps needed to be undertaken in the implementation of their housing projects. Through the LGU-CAP, local NHA offices are able to situate where each LGU in their jurisdiction is in terms of their housing provision projects, allowing them to provide apt assistance to the LGUs, fast tracking the project implementation.

Approval of the Rationalization Plan by the Governance Commission for Government-

Owned or Controlled Corporations (GCG). With the approval of the Rationalization Plan,

incumbent/regular employees will be given the opportunity to move within the organization

and select/qualified Emergency Hirees (EH) will be considered for placement to available

positions.

III. SALES AND DISPOSITION

For 2016, about 77,734 units with sales value of P19.559 Billion were targeted to be sold. At the end of the year, a total of 33,173 units was sold with sales value of P5.462 Billion, representing 43% and 28% of targets in units and sales value.

Table 8: Sales and Disposition by Program

Value Value

Units (PB) Units (PB) Units Value

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5=3/1) (6=4/2)

GRAND TOTAL 77,734 19.559 33,173 5.462 43 28

RESIDENTIAL 77,633 17.658 33,033 4.075 43 23

Resettlement 27,549 7.183 15,215 3.163 55 44

Settlements Upgrading 4,346 0.410 2,966 0.262 68 64

Sites and Services & 1,643 0.244 759 0.076 46 31

Core Housing

Medium Rise Housing 490 0.180 282 0.093 58 52

AFP/PNP Housing 6,812 1.660 852 0.218 13 13

Housing Program for 27,005 7.395 5,133 19 0

Calamity Victims

Turned Over Projects 9,788 0.586 7,826 0.263 80 45

C I I 101 1.901 140 1.386 139 73

Estate Based 99 0.153 139 0.075 140 49

Non-Estate Based 2 1.748 1 1.311 50 75

Program

Target Accomp. % vs. Target

Page | 22

3.1 Residential Units

3.1.1 A total of 33,033 residential units was sold in 2016 accounting for 43% of the 77,633 target. The corresponding sales value of these units of P4.075 Billion was 23% of target (P17.658 Billion). Almost half of the units sold were from Resettlement Program (15,215 units or 46% of total), followed by Turned-Over Projects (7,826 units or 24% of total) and Housing Program for Calamity Victims-Typhoon Pablo (5,133 units or 16%) which were disposed as grant.

3.1.2 By type of inventory, the 33,033 unit-accomplishment consisted of existing

inventories of 16,559 units valued at P1.815 Billion and new inventories of

16,474 units valued at P2.260 Billion. Old inventories accomplished 60% of its

target while new inventories did only 33% of target.

Table 9: Sales by Type of Inventory

Value Value

Units (PB) Units (PB) Units Value

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5=3/1) (6=4/2)

GRAND TOTAL 77,633 17.658 33,033 4.075 43 23

New Inventory 49,841 13.184 16,474 2.260 33 17

Old Inventory 27,792 4.474 16,559 1.815 60 41

Type of Inventory

2016 Target Accomp. % vs. Target

Page | 23

3.1.3 In summary, the issues on disposition of residential units are shown in the

following tables:

Table 10: Summary of Issues (Old Inventory)

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

TOTAL

126

14,781

INTERNAL ISSUES

16

2,068

Recommendation for

legalization of occupancy under

review by Management

NHA-Administered Resettlement

Turned-over Projects

2

1

1

1,506

747

759

No available units for disposition

AFP/PNP Housing







6

1

3

1

1

421

365

31

18

7

For conversion of land use to

non-saleable


2 48

Lot Inventory System (LIS) for

set-up/updating

AFP/PNP Housing

Medium Rise Housing

2

1

1

40

27

13

With illegal entrants Sites and Services 3 35

No approved selling prices Medium Rise Housing 1 18

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

EXTERNAL ISSUES

110

12,713

Late submission of application/

documents; ongoing

documentation of award



Sites and Services



- Typhoon Sendong




AFP/PNP Housing

Medium Rise Housing

39

6

10

14

5

1

1

1

1

5,104

2,054

1,716

452

381

372

73

55

1

Page | 24

Technical issues (lots for re-

survey, no approved subdivision

plan)





Sites and Services


19

5

2

1

11

2,541

1,929

275

216

121

Slow relocation of beneficiaries

due to voluntary relocation

activity/drug testing

requirements of LGU



4 1,263

Refusal of occupants to apply


Sites and Services

Medium Rise Housing

Turned-Over Projects


23

6

4

3

2

8

1,194

628

273

185

67

41

List of applicants/beneficiaries

for endorsement by

LGU/AFP/PNP Housing Board



AFP/PNP Housing

3

2

1

711

484

227

Award for LIAC resolution


Turned-Over Projects

2

1

1

560

281

279

No right of way Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger


1 480

Units not ready for occupancy

due to lack/no water and power

provision by service providers



2 381

Documentary requirements for

submission by occupants



Sites and Services

Medium Rise Housing

8

1

3

3

1

244

223

17

3

1

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

Unstable peace and order

condition


1 88

With legal issue/conflict of

claims


Medium Rise Housing


5

3

1

1

38

33

3

2

Others (no ROW, no

applicants/takers)

Medium Rise Housing

Sites and Services

AFP/PNP Housing

3

1

1

1

109

30

29

50

Page | 25

Table 11: Summary of Issues (New Inventory)

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

TOTAL

111

40,172

INTERNAL ISSUES

46

12,977

No available units for award

(ongoing construction of

projects, projects not

implemented)


- Typhoon Yolanda

- Typhoon Sendong



AFP/PNP Housing




30

19

18

1

8

2

1

8,550

5,643

5,523

120

1,652

1,015

240

LIS for set-up/updating Housing Program for Calamity Victims

- Typhoon Yolanda

5 3,296

For disposition by LGUs RAPLGU 7 721

Beneficiaries endorsed by LGUs

for verification


- Typhoon Pablo

3 326

No approved pricing NHA-Administered Resettlement 1 84

EXTERNAL ISSUES

65

27,195

No approved subdivision plan


- Typhoon Yolanda

AFP/PNP Housing






52

39

8

4

1

22,932

17,272

3,175

2,324

161

Issues

Programs Affected

No. of

Projects

Affected

Units

Affected

Units not ready for occupancy

due to lack/no water and power

provision by service providers






6

5

1

2,564

2,464

100

Page | 26

List of applicants for

endorsement by AFP/PNP

Housing Board

AFP/PNP Housing

3 1,046

Late submission of application/

documents; ongoing

documentation of award








4

1

1

1

1

653

288

226

98

41

3.1.4 Out of the 94,895 units completed in 2016, about 42% (39,413 units) are for

sale by NHA. The disposition of the rest of the completed units -- under joint

undertaking with the LGUs is the responsibility of the LGU concerned while

those under Housing Assistance Program for Calamity Victims particularly

HOMA, are considered as sold outrightly.

Given the beginning inventory of 62,000 units in 2016, the completed units which are under disposition by NHA of 39,500 and the sales performance of 33,000 units, the year-end inventory is placed at about 68,500 units.

3.2 Commercial, Industrial, Institutional (CII) Lots and Foreclosed Properties

A total of 140 CII units valued at P1.386 Billion was disposed, consisting of 139 estate-based units and 1 non-estate based unit. CII units performed 139% versus its annual target.

Contributing to the high performance level of CII units was the unprogrammed accomplishment of 77 estate-based units with a sales value of P.0.021 Billion (48 units sold in Tondo, Manila, 22 units in Zamboanga City, 5 units in Dasmariñas, Cavite and 2 units in Bagong Silang, Caloocan City).

Page | 27

On the other hand, some 37 estate-based units were not disposed out of the targeted 99 units for the year. The following are the issues/status of these units: Table 12: Summary of Issues/Status on Estate-Based Units

Issues/Status

Units

Affected

TOTAL

37

Sale of units accomplished in 2017 3

Application for units for approval of Management 1

Sale of unit under negotiation 1

Pricing-related

• Proposed pricing for submission to Management 14

• Unit subject to re-appraisal due to omission of the lease rates by the appraisers

1

• Pricing of units lapsed, no request for appraisal/pricing 8

Applicants did not pursue submission of applications due to presence of ISFs on site 4

No applicants for the units 5

The other non-estate based unit (located in Agham Road corner North Avenue, Quezon City with a sales value of P0.437 Billion) will be offered for lease this 2017. To support operations, the “Guidelines Prescribing the Payment of Capital Gains Tax and Documentary Stamp Tax to the Bureau of Internal Revenue to Effect Transfer of Ownership of Disposed and Fully Paid Commercial, Industrial, Institutional, Mixed-Use and Acquired Properties to Buyers” was issued in 2016.

The sales and disposition by Mode of Disposition and AMO/Region versus 2016 targets are shown in Annexes C-C2.

Page | 28

IV. COLLECTION Table 13: Collection by Type of Account (P Billion)

Type of Account Target Accomp

TOTAL 3.590 3.369 94

RESIDENTIAL 0.756 1.049 139

Installment Contract Receivables/ 0.475 0.601 127

Lease

Loans 0.093 0.200 215

Trust Accounts 0.189 0.249 132

COMM./INDL./INST. 2.834 2.320 82

% vs.

Target

4.1 The total collection for the year of P3.369 Billion accounted for 94% of annual target (P3.590 Billion). It consisted of collection from residential accounts of P1.049 Billion (31% of total), with CII accounts contributing P2.320 Billion (69%).

4.2 Residential accounts exceeded its annual target by 39%. On the other hand, CII accounts accomplished 82% of its annual target (P2.834 Billion).

To support sales and collection operations in Bagong Silang Resettlement Project in Caloocan City, an Occupancy Verification and Affordability Assessment Survey (OVAAS) was conducted in 2016. The data gathered from the survey and interview conducted enabled the project office concerned to identify issues affecting sales and collection, allowing them to create solution-oriented policies to mitigate the identified problems, eventually increasing their sales and collection accomplishment. The collection by Program and AMO/Region versus 2016 target are shown in Annexes D and D1.

Page | 29

V. BUDGET PERFORMANCE

5.1 Funds Raised (P Billion)

Table 14: Funds Raised by Source

Funds Total

Source Budget Raised Budget Accomp.

(1) (2) (3=2/1)

TOTAL 98.691 81.999 83 100

BEGINNING BALANCE 64.717 64.717 100 79

Carry-over Obligations 47.752 47.752 100 58

Fund Balance 16.966 16.966 100 21

NEW FUNDS 33.974 17.282 51 21

NG Support (GAA) 31.402 13.896 44 17

2015 (Unreleased Appropriation) 0.861 0.861 100 1

Housing Program for Calamity Victims 0.118 0.118 100 0

Housing Program for ISFs Living along Danger 0.742 0.742 100 1

Areas in Metro Manila

2016 30.541 13.036 43 16

Resettlement Program 0.577 0.368 64 0

Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger 4.300 2.577 60 3


Housing Program for Calamity Victims (T. Yolanda) 25.601 9.787 38 12

NDRRMF-Typhoon Nona 0.276 0

Zamboanga Conflict 0.028 0

North Triangle Relocation Project 0.063 0 0

Corporate & Other Receipts 2.572 3.385 132 4

% vs.

(4=2/

Total 2)

5.1.1 In 2016, the total Funds Raised amounted to P81.999 Billion accounting for 83% of the Corporate Operating Budget (COB) of P98.691 Billion. It consisted of Beginning Balance of P64.717 Billion and New Funds of P17.282 Billion broken down into National Government Support of P13.896 Billion and Corporate and Other Receipts of P3.385 Billion.

NG Support was for the following housing programs: Typhoon Yolanda Victims (P9.787 Billion), ISFs Living along Danger Areas in Metro Manila (P3.319 Billion), Resettlement Program (P0.368 Billion), NDRRMF-Typhoon Nona (P0.276 Billion), Calamity Victims (P0.118 Billion) and Zamboanga Conflict (P0.028 Billion).

Page | 30

5.1.2 NG Support. The total appropriation due for release to NHA in 2016 amounted to P31.402 Billion: P0.861 Billion representing unreleased 2015 GAA and P30.541 Billion 2016 GAA. The 2015 GAA was 100% released by DBM while of the P30.541 Billion 2016

GAA, only 43% or P13.036 Billion was released as of end of the year.

5.1.3 Corporate and Other Receipts. The P3.385 Billion raised by NHA was 132% of target of P2.572 Billion. Of this, P1.363 Billion are restricted funds.

5.2 Fund Utilization (P Billion)

Table 15: Funds Utilized by Source

Funds Funds Funds Total

Source Raised Obligated Raised Obligated

(1) (2) (3=2/1)

TOTAL 81.999 67.863 83 100

BEGINNING BALANCE 64.718 53.866 83 79

Carryover Obligations 47.752 47.752 100 70

Fund Balance 16.966 6.115 36 9

NEW FUNDS 17.281 13.997 81 21

NG Support (GAA) 13.896 12.479 90 18

Resettlement 0.368 0.249 68 0

Housing Program for ISFs Living Along Danger 3.319 2.741 83 4


Housing Program for Calamity Victims (T. Yolanda) 9.787 9.343 95 14

Housing Program for Calamity Victims 0.118 0.118 100 0

NDRRMF-Typhoon Nona 0.276 0 0

Zamboanga Conflict 0.028 0.028 100 0

Corporate & Other Receipts 3.385 1.518 45 2

% vs.

(4=2/

Total 2

5.2.1 The Total Funds Obligated of P67.863 Billion accounted for 83% of Funds

Raised (P81.999 Billion). It consisted of 79% Beginning Balance (P53.866

Billion) and 21% New Funds (P13.997 Billion).

Page | 31

Table 16: Funds Utilized by Use

Funds Funds Fund Funds Total

Type of Expenditure Raised Obligated Balance Raised Obligated

(5=2/

(1) (2) (3) (4=2/1) Total 2)

TOTAL 81.999 67.863 14.136 83 100

CAPITAL OUTLAY 78.725 66.318 12.407 84 98

Project Development 74.239 63.406 10.832 85 93

Resettlement 6.724 5.304 1.420 79 8

Housing Program for ISFs Living Along 14.445 12.337 2.107 85 18

Danger Areas in Metro Manila

Housing Assistance Program for 43.155 40.986 2.169 95 60

Calamity Victims

Settlements Upgrading 0.138 0.082 0.056 59 0

Sites and Services 0.020 0.020 0.000 100 0

AFP/PNP Housing Program 9.358 4.677 4.681 50 7

Poverty Alleviation Fund 3 0.078 0.000 0.078 0 0

Lump Sum 0.322 0.000 0.321 0 0

Housing Support 0.836 0.821 0.015 98 1

Land Acquisition 0.677 0.366 0.311 54 1

Other Project-Related Capital Outlay 2.527 1.295 1.232 51 2

Other Capital Outlay 0.447 0.430 0.017 96 1

DEBT SERVICE 0.241 0.241 0.000 100 0

COE 3.033 1.304 1.729 43 2

Obligations % vs.

5.2.2 Funds Obligated were for the following: Capital Outlay (P66.318 Billion, 98%), Debt Service (P0.241 Billion) and COE (P1.304 Billion, 2%).

5.2.3 Of the Total Capital Outlay Obligations of P66.318 Billion, P63.406 Billion or

95% was for Project Development broken down into:

Funds % to

Area Obligated Total

National Capital Region P 4.041 M 6%

Northern & Central Luzon 24.373 37%

Southern Luzon & Bicol 18.324 28%

Visayas 12.369 19%

Minadano 4.298 6%

Total P 63.406 M 95%

We have targeted P0.241 Billion for Debt Service as payment for NG Advances

of P0.241 Billion which we have already fully paid.

Page | 32

5.2.4 As of 31 December 2016, NHA’s COE Actual Obligation reached P1.304 Billion broken down as follows:

• Personnel Services (PS) in the total amount of P0.658 Billion with the highest expense for Salaries and Wages (P0.375 or 57% of total), followed by GSIS-Life and Retirement Insurance Contribution (P0.042 Billion) and Performance-Based Bonus (P0.041 Billion), representing 6% each of total.

• Maintenance and Other Operating (MOOE) of P0.646 Billion. The top 3 expenses for the year were Professional Services (P0.321 Billion or 50%), followed by Other Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (P0.036 Billion), and Supplies and Materials Expense (P0.036 Billion), at 6% each.

5.2.5 Fund Balance. Out of the P81.999 Billion Funds Raised, P67.863 Billion was

obligated leaving a Fund Balance of P14.136 Billion at the end of the year. This Fund Balance represents unobligated funds released and allocated for specific purposes broken down as follows:

• Resettlement P3.198 Billion Regular Resettlement P1.176 Housing Program for ISFs Living along Danger Areas in Metro Manila P1.803 R-10 P0.219

• Calamity Funds P2.303 Billion Emergency Housing Assistance Program/ Housing Program for Calamity Victims P2.146 Reconstruction & Rehabilitation Program Fund P0.157

• AFP/PNP P4.680 Billion

• Settlements Upgrading P0.042 Billion

• Poverty Alleviation Fund P0.103 Billion

• Trust Funds P1.183 Billion Local Housing P0.804 Medium Rise Housing P0.182 National Government Center P0.197

• Other Sources P0.498 Billion

• Corporate Receipts P2.128 Billion --------------------- P14.136 Billion

Page | 33

VI. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

6.1 Result of Operations

Table 17: Comprehensive Income (P Billion)

Particulars PB %

(1) (2) (3=1-2) (4=3/2)

Total Revenue 1.663 1.524 0.139 9

Total Expenses 1.336 1.190 0.146 12

Surplus/(Deficit) before Subsidy 0.327 0.334 (0.007) (2)

Subsidy from NG (net) 10.182 10.700 (0.518) (5)

Net Income after Subsidy 10.509 11.034 (0.525) (5)

Increase/(Decrease)

2016 2015

6.1.1 For CY 2016, the Authority registered a 9% increase in Total Revenue mainly due to profit realized from sale of NHA properties, to wit:

Table 18: Properties Sold in 2016

Commercial/Industrial Lots

Selling Price

(P B)

Profit Realized

(P B)

TOTAL 2.686 0.626

Vertis North – Sureste Properties, Inc. 1.977 0.579

East Triangle – NKTI 0.404 0.030

Pleasant Hills Subdivision – Montefranco Ventures, Inc.

0.082 0.011

Government Center, East Triangle – Bright Homes

0.223 0.006

High generation of cash from lease/rental of various projects and collection of penalty interests/fees also contributed to the increase in Total Revenue.

6.1.2 On the Expenditure side, the net increase of 12% was due to the

compulsory/early retirement of employees, the number of emergency hirees, increase in usage of office supplies as a result of additional computers/printers, additional security guards in various regional offices, and repairs and maintenance of service vehicles.

Page | 34

6.1.3 For the year 2016, a total of P12.040 Billion subsidy was received from the National Government, purposely for the implementation of various programs of NHA for families affected by calamities and resettlement and relocation of informal settlers living along danger areas. The subsidy received covers unreleased 2012-2016 SARO.

6.1.4 For CY 2016, the NHA was able to contribute P0.164 Billion dividends to the

National Treasury representing 50% of the Annual Income of P0.327 Billion. 6.2 Financial Condition

Table 19: Financial Position (P Billion)

Particulars PB %(1) (2) (3=1-2) (4=3/2)

Assets 117.443 105.112 12.331 12

Liabilities 16.516 15.687 0.829 5

Equity 100.927 89.425 11.502 13

Increase/(Decrease)2016 2015

6.2.1 Total Assets as of December 31, 2016 is P117.443 Billion, an increase of 12% or P12.331 Billion compared to the December 31, 2015 figure of P105.112 Billion attributed mainly to:

• More completed projects ready for disposition in the Visayas Region (P10.634 Billion)

• Loans granted to relocatees/beneficiaries under Housing Program for AFP/PNP/BJMP, Informal Settler Families residing in Danger Areas in Metro Manila, Families affected by Typhoons Yolanda and Pablo, Zamboanga Conflict and various resettlement projects funded from the subsidy for CY 2010-2015 (P2.574 Billion)

• Cost of on-going construction of buildings within the NHA Compound (Annex GSD/COSO, NHA Wellness Center) and Palawan Project Office (P1.170 Billion)

6.2.2 Total Liabilities grew by 5% or P0.829 Billion reaching P16.516 Billion as of December 31, 2016, compared to P15.687 Billion in December 2015, due to the following:

• Amount of retention deducted from the progress billing of contractors/developers, to guarantee performance which is subject to the completion of the project (P0.952 Billion)

• Trust fund from DILG for the transfer of informal settler families living in danger areas and high-risk areas to safe and decent housing sites – OPLAN LIKAS (or Lumikas para Iwas sa Kalamidad at Sakit) program (P0.274 Billion)

• Trust fund from Ayala Land, Inc. for Vertis North RPP proceeds (P0.387 Billion)

6.2.3 Government Equity reached P100.927 Billion, an increase of P11.502 Billion

or 13% mainly due to Subsidy Income from the National Government for the various resettlement programs of NHA both for informal settler families and those affected by calamities, and the AFP/PNP Housing Program.

Page | 35

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE BY AREA MANAGEMENT OFFICE

Table 20: Summary of Performance – National Capital Region

% vs. % vs. % Inc/

KRA Target Accomp. Target Target Accomp. Target (Dec)

(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4) (7=3-6)

Projects Implemented 32 22 69 32 23 72 (3)

Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 15,007 4,197 28 12,861 9,109 71 (43)

Completions 15,476 9,116 59 2,924 6,087 208 (149)


Units 15,719 9,038 57 11,652 10,045 86 (29)

Value (P B) 3.663 0.918 25 1.686 1.570 93 (68)

Collection (P B) 0.391 0.627 161 0.557 0.566 102 59

2016 2015

Table 21: Summary of Performance – Northern and Central Luzon

% vs. % vs. % Inc/


(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4) (7=3-6)


Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 66,045 45,015 68 33,139 56,218 170 (101)

Completions 66,784 40,966 61 35,508 28,509 80 (19)


Units 16,370 12,710 78 20,483 16,110 79 (1)

Value (P B) 2.747 1.780 65 3.684 3.401 92 (28)

Collection (P B) 0.111 0.297 266 0.196 0.300 153 113

2016 2015

Page | 36

Table 22: Summary of Performance – Southern Luzon and Bicol

% vs. % vs. % Inc/


(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4) (7=3-6)


Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 48,002 38,284 80 24,387 26,948 111 (31)

Completions 33,941 30,121 89 38,204 25,134 66 23


Units 14,804 5,838 39 22,065 19,075 86 (47)

Value (P B) 3.281 1.406 43 5.049 4.868 96 (54)

Collection (P B) 0.224 0.283 126 0.357 0.259 73 54

2016 2015

Table 23: Summary of Performance – Visayas

% vs. % vs. % Inc/


(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4) (7=3-6)


Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 29,067 13,905 48 19,083 20,225 106 (58)

Completions 31,070 9,094 29 32,911 20,730 63 (34)


Units 27,405 192 1 2,797 1,604 57 (57)

Value (P B) 7.679 0.031 0 0.583 0.323 55 (55)

Collection (P B) 0.054 0.067 125 0.098 0.073 74 50

2016 2015

Page | 37

Table 24: Summary of Performance – Mindanao

% vs. % vs. % Inc/


(1) (2) (3=2/1) (4) (5) (6=5/4) (7=3-6)

Implemented Projects 122 108 89 128 124 97 (8)

Housing Production/

Assistance

Starts 8,981 4,424 49 10,177 9,336 92 (42)

Completions 15,991 5,598 35 14,638 13,310 91 (56)


Units 3,434 5,394 157 1,038 1,172 113 44

Value (P B) 0.441 0.015 3 0.307 0.065 21 (18)

Collection (P B) 0.044 0.048 111 0.053 0.043 81 31

2016 2015

Page | 38

Page | 39

Page | 40

Special Report

Page | 41

IPs OF REGION XII: THE COLORFUL PEOPLE

AND THEIR SHELTERS A DREAM come true! This seemingly was how a number of Indigenous Peoples in

Region XII reacted when new houses built by the government were turned over to them by

the National Housing Authority.

Region XII is composed of the provinces of South Cotabato, Cotabato, Sarangani and Sultan Kudarat. It is home to 12.79% Indigenous Peoples (IPs) in the country next to Region X (13.33%) and Region XI (16.63%). The region has a total population of 4,545,276 (2015 Population Census) and based on the data of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP), there are 1,447,972 IPs in the area or about a third of the region’s population.

These Indigenous Cultural Communities usually live in the mountainous areas of the region, hurdling the day-to-day hardships while “competing” with the predators in the wild to make both ends meet. The Manobos call the mountains “bobongan,” which means roof or shelter in English; and “bobong” in Tagalog.

Republic Act No. 8371, also known as the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997, was enacted to recognize, protect and promote the rights of Indigenous Cultural Communities/Indigenous Peoples. Among the basic needs, housing has been identified as one necessity that these people fall short of.

Since time immemorial, our IP brothers and sisters live in makeshift houses made of indigenous materials that cannot withstand the nature’s wrath as well as attacks from wild animals. Although they are used to it being longtime highlanders, tranquility is still out of reach as every corner of their community suggests danger. While the government has addressed the housing need of the lowest 30% of the population, specifically the informal settler families (ISFs), those of the IPs were not given much attention until Memorandum Circular No. 2423 was created on April 18, 2012.

A relatively new program of the government, Housing Assistance Program for Indigenous Peoples (HAPIP) has truly made a difference in the lives of the IPs. They may now enjoy living in a shelter they can call their own, away from the dangers of the mountains.

Clustered in select sites ideal for housing, their new homes have given them a new sense of pride, community belongingness, safeness and fulfillment. The houses were built based on the IPs’ desires on the type of shelter they want. Most opted for G.I. roofing with semi-concrete walls, citing their excitement of experiencing the kind of housing enjoyed by the people in urban areas. It was seemingly a simple joy for most of us but for the IPs, it’s the realization of their hopes and dreams.

It should be emphasized that the government not only limit themselves in building houses but also provide livelihood assistance and social services for the community to thrive and become sustainable.

Page | 42

Page | 43

Page | 44

CORPORATE PROFILE

Agency Classification:

The NHA is a Government-owned and-Controlled Corporation (GOCC) under the

administrative supervision of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council

(HUDCC) and classified under the Infrastructure Utilities Group.

Charter

Presidential Decree No. 757 dated 31 July 1975.

Mandates:

Under PD 757 dated 31 July 1975. NHA was tasked to develop and implement a

comprehensive and integrated housing program which shall embrace, among others, housing

development and resettlement, sources and schemes of financing, and delineation of

government and private sector participation.

Under EO 90 dated 17 December 1986. NHA was mandated as the sole national government

agency to engage in shelter production focusing on the housing needs of the lowest 30% of the

urban population.

Under RA 7279 (UDHA) dated 24 March 1992. NHA was tasked to provide technical and

other forms of assistance to Local Government Units (LGUs) in the implementation of their

housing programs; to undertake identification, acquisition and disposition of lands for

socialized housing; and to undertake relocation and resettlement of families with Local

Government Units.

Under RA 7835 (CISFA) dated 08 December 1994. NHA was tasked with the

implementation of the following components of the National Shelter Program - the

Resettlement Program, Low Rise Public and Private Housing, Cost Recoverable Programs and

the Local Housing Program.

Under EO 195 dated 31 December 1999. NHA was mandated to focus on socialized housing

through the development and implementation of a comprehensive and integrated housing

development and resettlement; fast tracking the determination and development of government

lands suitable for housing; and ensuring the sustainability of socialized housing funds by

improving its collection efficiency, among others.

Page | 45

PROGRAMS

Production

Resettlement Program

• NHA-Administered Resettlement Program. This involves the acquisition and

development of large tracts of land to generate serviced lots or core housing units for

families displaced from sites earmarked for government infrastructure projects and those

occupying danger areas such as waterways, esteros, and railroad tracks. Cognizant of

the affordability level of its target beneficiaries and the temporary economic dislocation

inherent in relocation, the Program relies on subsidy support from the National

Government.

• Housing Materials Assistance is integrated into the Resettlement Program as a

component of housing development. Housing Materials Assistance entails the provision

of building materials to relocated families for the construction of houses using sweat

equity in lieu of a completed housing unit developed by NHA.

• Resettlement Assistance Program for Local Government Units. The development of

resettlement sites by the LGU is assisted by the NHA under its Resettlement Assistance

Program for LGUs and is implemented as joint undertaking of the LGU and NHA. The

LGU’s primary contribution is land while the NHA provides funds to cover the cost of

land development. LGUs recover the project cost from beneficiaries and utilize the

proceeds exclusively for project maintenance or to acquire and/or develop new

resettlement sites.

Slum Upgrading entails the acquisition and on-site improvement of occupied lands through

the introduction of roads or alleys and basic services such as water and power. The land tenure

issue is resolved through the sale of homelots to bonafide occupants.

Sites and Services Development entails the acquisition and development of raw land into

serviced homelots which shall serve as an alternative to informal settlements as well as

catchment areas for in-migration and population growth. This approach shall be adopted in

urban centers where population growth and overspill is anticipated and where beneficiaries

intend to acquire housing on incremental basis.

Low Rise Housing is an in-city housing alternative which entails the construction of three-to-

five-storey buildings. The Low Rise Public Housing Program is implemented directly by NHA,

utilizing the allocation for the program under RA 7835 and units are made available under lease

arrangement. The Low Rise Private Housing Program, on the other hand, is implemented

directly by NHA or in joint venture with other government agencies and/or the private sector.

Tenure is on ownership basis.

Page | 46

Core Housing Program entails the acquisition and development of raw land as well as the

construction of housing units designed to match the affordability of the target market consisting

mostly of low-salaried government and private sector employees. Projects under this program

are implemented under a joint venture arrangement with the private sector or LGUs. The

partners invest or contribute equity in the project in terms of land or funds for land development

and house construction.

Community-Based Housing Programs

• Tenurial Assistance. Community resources are mobilized for the resolution of land

tenure issues and/or site development through the Land Tenure Assistance Program

(LTAP), the Community Mortgage Program (CMP), and the Community Land

Acquisition Support Program (CLASP). Under the LTAP, NHA extends credit

assistance to community associations for the acquisition of land they occupy or intend

to be resettled. Under the community-based approaches, the NHA acts as conduit

between community associations/cooperatives and financing institutions such as the

National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMFC), the Home Development

Mutual Fund (HDMF or Pag-IBIG Fund) and other government and non-government

institutions offering liberalized financing for land acquisition and other forms of grants/

inputs to people’s organizations.

• Technical Assistance. The NHA likewise extends technical assistance to the community

associations/ cooperative or Local Government Units (LGUs) in terms of community

organization, negotiation with the landowner, preparation of required development

plans, formulation of disposition and collection schemes, and coordination with other

national government agencies for the processing of required documents.

Programs for Families Affected by Calamities

Emergency Housing Assistance Program addresses the need of families rendered homeless due

to natural calamities or man-made disasters. This entails the provision of temporary shelter for

immediate relief of the affected families, the provision of home materials assistance for housing

reconstruction, and the development of new settlements.

• Temporary Shelter and Evacuation centers entail the construction of temporary housing

facilities intended as evacuation centers for affected families.

• Housing Materials Assistance Program (HOMA) involves the provision of housing

materials for house repair and construction.

Resettlement addresses the need to provide new settlements for permanently displaced

families.

Page | 47

DELIVERY SCHEMES

Joint Venture. A strategy based on a resource/expertise–sharing scheme with private

landowners, private developers, Local Government Units, Non-Government Organizations

(NGOs) and People’s Organizations (POs) with equity contribution taking the form of land or

funds for development.

Origination. The NHA acts as originator of housing loans availed by organized community

associations from the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation under the Community

Mortgage Program. As originator, NHA extends technical assistance to community

associations in terms or organization and registration negotiation with landowner, preparation

of required plans and maps, formulation of disposition and collection scheme and coordination

with national government agencies.

Direct Delivery. NHA undertakes housing development on its own through the award of civil

works contracts. Project planning, financing, implementation/contract supervision, and

disposition of housing units are undertaken directly by NHA. This approach is pursued in areas

where there are no potential partners, either government or private, or where the magnitude of

the project is beyond local capabilities and for major projects of national concern.

Technical Assistance. The NHA provides its joint venture partners the technical support and

services required to ensure proper planning as well as efficient implementation, operation, and

management of the housing projects. The technical assistance provided by the NHA covers any

of the various aspects of project development: project planning and packaging, project

implementation, works engineering, project supervision, beneficiary selection, and estate

management. The NHA may likewise extend technical services to Local Government Units in

the formulation of Local Housing Plans that would define programs, strategies and approaches

that the LGUs could adopt and the targets and resources needed to effectively address housing

problems within their localities.

Page | 48

GOVERNING BOARD

Chairman: Chairman, Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council

Members : Secretary, Department of Public Works and Highways

Director-General, National Economic and Development Authority

Secretary, Department of Finance

Secretary, Department of Labor and Employment

Secretary, Department of Trade and Industry

Executive Secretary, Office of the President

General Manager, National Housing Authority

Manpower Complement as

of December 2016: 1,494 employees

Authorized Capitalization

PD 757 (1975) : P500 million

PD 1430 (1978) : Increased to P2 billion

PD 1924 (1984) : Increased to 5 billion

Financial Condition as of December 31, 2016

Net Income after Subsidy: P10.509 billion

Total Assets : P117.443 billion

Total Liability : P16.516 billion

Equity : P100.927 billion

Page | 49

BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As of November 2016)

Vice President MARIA LEONOR “Leni” ROBREDO

Chairperson

Housing and Urban Development

Coordinating Council

(HUDCC)

MARCELINO P. ESCALADA, JR. Mark A. Villar General Manager Member

National Housing Authority

(NHA)

Marcelino P. Escalada, Jr.

General Manager Sec. MARK A. VILLAR

Member

Department of Public Works and Highways

(DPWH)

Alternate:

Usec. Ma. Catalina E. Cabral Ma. Catalina E. Cabral

DPWH Alternate

Sec. ERNESTO M. PERNIA

Member

Ernesto M. Pernia National Economic and Development Authority

Member (NEDA)

Alternate:

DDG Rolando G. Tungpalan

NEDA

Sec. RAMON M. LOPEZ Ramon M. Lopez

Member Member

Department of Trade and Industry

(DTI)

Alternate:

DDG Rolando G. Tungpalan Usec. Ruth B. Castelo

Alternate DTI

Ruth B. Castelo

Alternate

Page | 50

BOARD OF DIRECTORS (As of November 2016)

Atty. SALVADOR C. MEDIALDEA Atty. Salvador C. Medialdea

Silverio H. Bello III Executive Secretary Member

Member Member

Office of the President

Alternate:

Atty. Ryan Alvin R. Acosta

Deputy Executive Secretary

Office of the President

Sec. SILVERIO H. BELLO III Member Atty. Ryan Alvin R. Acosta

Department of Labor and Employment Alternate

Dominador R. Say (DOLE)

Alternate Alternates:

Usec. Domindaor R. Say

Asec. Mariano Alquiza

DOLE

Usec. Carlos G. Dominguez III

Member

Department of Finance

(DOF) Carlos G. Dominguez III

Alternates: Member

Usec. Bayani H. Agabin

Mariano Alquiza Atty. Cristina Mia S. Pineda

Alternate Asec. Soledad Emilia J. Cruz

DOF

Bayani H. Agabin Primary Alternate

Page | 51

LIST OF PROJECTS IMPLEMENTED

IN 2016

Page | 52

Page | 53

Page | 54

Page | 55

Page | 56

Page | 57

Page | 58

Page | 59

Page | 60

Page | 61

Page | 62

Page | 63

Page | 64

Page | 65

Page | 66

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AFP/PNP - Armed Forces of the Philippines/Philippine National Police

AITECH - Accreditation of Innovative Technologies for Housing

AMO - Area Management Office

BJMP - Bureau of Jail Management and Penology

CAP - Capability-Building Program

CBSL - Community-Based Shelter and Liability Program

CII - Commercial, Industrial, Institutional

CISFA - Comprehensive and Integrated Shelter Financing Act

CLASP - Community Land Acquisition Support Program

CMP - Community Mortgage Program

COB - Corporate Operating Budget

COE - Corporate Operating Expenditure

COSO - Corporate Operations and Systems Office

CPES - Constructors’ Performance Evaluation System

CSO - Civil Society Organization

CY - Calendar Year

DBM - Department of Budget and Management

DENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources

DICT - Department of Information and Communication Technology

DILG - Department of the Interior and Local Government

DOLF - Directors and Officers Liability Fund

DPWH - Department of Public Works and Highways

ECC - Environmental Compliance Certificate

EH - Emergency Hirees

GAA - General Appropriations Act

GCG - Governance Commission for Government-Owned or –Controlled

Corporations

Page | 67

GOCC - Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation

GSD - General Services Department

GSIS - Government Service Insurance System

HDMF or

Pag-IBIG

Fund - Home Development Mutual Fund

HOMA - Housing Materials Assistance

HTDO - Housing Technology Development Office

HUDCC - Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council

ISFs - Informal Settler Families

JV - Joint Venture

LIAC - Local Inter-Agency Committee

LGU - Local Government Unit

LIS - Lot Inventory System

LRB - Low-Rise Building

LTAP - Land Tenure Assistance Program

MM - Metro Manila

MOOE - Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses

NG - National Government

NGCP - National Grid Corporation of the Philippines

NGO - National Government Organization

NHA - National Housing Authority

NHMFC - National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation

NKTI - National Kidney Transplant Institute

NSRP - North-South Railway Project

OVAAS - Occupancy Verification and Affordability Assessment Survey

PD - Presidential Decree

PCUP - Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor

PS - Personal Services

ROW - Right of Way

Page | 68

RRAP - Relocation and Resettlement Assistance Program

SARO - Special Allotment Release Order

TOR - Terms of Reference

UDHA - Urban Development and Housing Act

Documents

WORD FROM THE PRESIDENT · mapapabilis ang proseso na hindi na nahihirapan. We have here homeowners associations, hindi ko po alam kung may urban poor ... sa pag-follow-up, pagkuha