Upload
lacey
View
90
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
PPPL Visit. Research Activities in KAIST-FPTRC. February 18, 2014. Wonho CHOE Fusion Plasma Transport Research Center (FPTRC) Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST). SXR & VUV imaging diagnostics on KSTAR (as of now). Soft X-ray array (SXRA) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
마스터 부제목 스타일 편집Wonho CHOE Fusion Plasma Transport Research Center (FPTRC)
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
February 18, 2014
Research Activities in KAIST-FPTRC
PPPL Visit
2SXR & VUV imaging diagnostics on KSTAR (as of now)
Soft X-ray array (SXRA) 2 arrays, 32 ch (64 ch) t = 2 μs, r = 5 cm Ar Ross filters (Cl & Ca K-edge): 2.8 – 4.0 keV Be filters (10, 50 μm: 0.5, 1.0 keV): 2 color
VUV spectroscopy 28 ch for imaging (5 - 20 nm), t = 13 ms 1 ch for survey (15 - 60 nm), t = 13 ms
2-D Tangential X-ray pinhole camera (TXPC) Duplex (2 color), 50x50 ch t = 0.1 ms, r = 2 cm
GEM detector for 2-D X-ray camera 12x12 pixels, 128 ch t = 1 ms, r = 2 - 6 cm 3 – 30 keV
Tomographic reconstruction codes developed Max. Entropy Method Phillips-Tikhonov Min. Fisher Information Cormack
3
edge
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
HD arrays (33-64)
HU arrays (1-32)
16 ch (32)
16 ch (32)
HU
HD
VD2
VU2
• 4 arrays, 256 ch• 2 cm, 2 μs
1 array, 60 ch
• 2 filters multi energy, neural network
• 1.3 cm, 2 μs
(1) SXR array diagnostic system
4 array, 256 channels
2013 20142 array, 64 ch
• Be filters (10, 50 mm)• Ar Ross filters (Ar trans-
port)• Bolometer (No filter)
S.H. Lee J. Jang
4
(2) Imaging VUV spectroscopy
2013 (5-20 nm, ~3 ms)2012 (15-60 nm, 13-40 ms)
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
ITER prototype on KSTAR (5 – 60 nm)
Vacuum extension
VUV spectrometer on the optical table
28 ch, imaging
In collaboration with ITER KO-DA (C.R. Seon)
1 ch, survey
He I : 53.70 nmHe II : 25.63, 30.37 nmO V : 15.61, 19.28, 21.50 nmO VI : 17.30, 18.40 nmC III : 38.62 nmC IV : 24.49, 38.41, 41.96 nmC V : 22.72, 24.87 nmFe XV : 28.42 nmFe XVI : 33.54, 36.08 nmW : 5-20 nm
Ar XIV 18.79 nmAr XV 22.11 nmAr XVI 35.39 nm
5
2.50 2.52 2.54 2.56 2.58 2.60 2.62 2.64 2.66 2.68 2.700
100
200
300
400
500
600 r/a = 0.10 r/a = 0.30
Time (s)
X-r
ay p
hoto
n co
unt (
A.U
.)
(a) (b)
Sawtooth crash in #7640
(3) ‘Tangential’ X-ray pinhole cameraIn collaboration with KAERI (M. Moon)
‘Duplex (2-color) Multi-Wire Proportional Counter (MWPC) detector
7640image-81.1s - 81.2s
10 20 30 40 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
7640image-81.2s - 81.3s
10 20 30 40 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
(a) (b)
Channel
Cha
nnel
Channel
Outboard Outboard
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50 -20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10(b) - (a)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
6
TXPC, RT-EFIT
Major radius, R
Visible camera
Major radius, R
Vloop
Ip
Stored en-ergy
ECE
Da
Shot 7886
Consistent with RT-EFIT and visible camera Tangential reconstruction on-going
X-ray imaging of VDE
S. Jang et al., CAP 13, 819 (2013)
7
Pulse Height Analyzer mode
Te by TXPC (PHA mode)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
1
2
3
Te (A
.U.)
Time (sec)
ECE_2 TXPC_11
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
0.81.01.21.41.61.82.02.22.42.62.83.0
1 s 2 s 3 s 4 s Linear Fit of 1 Linear Fit of 2 Linear Fit of 3 Linear Fit of 4
# of
pho
tons
(log
_sca
le)
Pulse height (A.U.)
8
(4) GEM detector for TXPC Front Back
128 ch in 12x12 cm2 Spatial & time resolution:
2-6 cm, 1 ms
In collaboration with ENEA (D. Pacella)
55Fe Source
Gas inGas out
Lan cable
HV cable
FPGA
Zoom in & out
GEM
[4] W. Bonivento et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A, 491, 233 (2002)
X-position mov-able
GEM foils: 50 µm thick kapton foil, copper clad on each side
Triple-GEM geometry: 3/1/2/1 mm Front-end electronics: CARIOCA micro chips by
LNF and CERN [4]
Active area: 10 x 10 cm2
Channels: 12 x 12 pixels (each pixel has 0.8 x 0.8 cm2)
Temporal: 10 µs (up to 255 frames), 1 ms (60k frames)
Mixed gas (flow): 70% Ar, and 30% CO2 at 1 atm Movable system
(zoom in & out and horizontally movable)
9
Preliminary result of GEM detectorshot 9033
Zoom inshot 9034 shot 9035 shot 9056
Zoom in & out
10
Time (s)
Freq
uenc
y (k
Hz)
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.6420
20
40
60
80
100
Sawtooth crash in H-mode
m = 1 (f = 19 kHz) is shown by spectrogram. Maximum displacement from the initial posi-
tion: 0.13 m Maximum rotation speed: 10.7 km/s
Spectrogramm = 1f = 19 kHz
R (m)
Z (m
)
Time 2.642000 sec
1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9 1.95 2-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Trajectory of the hot core
rtEFIT
11
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.642
0.6
0.8
1
SXR
007
(kW
/m2 )
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.6420
0.1
0.2
(m
)
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.6420
5
10
15
v (k
m/s)
Time (s)
Comparison between L- & H-mode
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360.2
0.3
SXR
007
(kW
/m2 )
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360
0.1
0.2
(m
)
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360
5
10
15
v (k
m/s)
Time (s)
Crash
< 5 km/s
0.1 m
Crash
< 10 km/s
< 0.1 m
L-mode, low vФ H-mode, high vФ
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360.2
0.3
SXR
007
(kW
/m2 )
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360
0.1
0.2
(m)
1.028 1.03 1.032 1.034 1.0360
5
10
15
v (km
/s)
Time (s)
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.642
0.6
0.8
1
SXR
007
(kW
/m2 )
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.6420
0.1
0.2
(m)
2.632 2.634 2.636 2.638 2.64 2.6420
5
10
15
v (km
/s)
Time (s)
Crash in multi steps
Crash in a single step
Displacement from central position
Displacement from central position
Poloidal velocity Poloidal velocity
12Correlation between SXR rotation speed & vФ (XICS)
50 100 150 200 2500
5
10
15
20
25
Toroidal Rotation Velocity [km s-1]
Freq
uenc
y (m
= 1
) [kH
z]
#7640#7642#7644#7645#7646#7647
• The m=1 SXR rotation speed is compared with toroidal rotation speed (XICS).• Toroidal rotation frequency
0 5 10 15 20 250
5
10
15
20
25
Rotation Frequency [kHz]
Freq
uenc
y (m
= 1
) [kH
z]
#7640#7642#7644#7645#7646#7647
Rf
2
13
ECH effect on Ar transport Argon gas injection through a piezo valve (nAr/ne < 0.1%)
Different transport with varying ECH positions Feasibility of impurity control? Analysis of Ar transport coefficients in L-mode (#7566, #7574) & H-mode (#7745, #7863)
by using UTC-SANCO code with diagnostic results (SXR, VUV, XICS)
0.4
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 Time (sec)
Ip (M
A)
Ar puffing20 ms
#756
6 0.4
0.2
0 1 2 3 4 Time (sec)
Ip (M
A)
Ar puffing20 ms
#757
4
ECH110 GHz350 kW
#786
3
L-mode
w/o ECH
R [m]
Z [m
]
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Heating positions(r/a = 0, 0.16, 0.30, 0.59)
w/ ECH
40 cm20100
Ar puffing after ECH start
Ar
14
1.8 1.9 2 2.1 2.2 2.3-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Time [s]
P SXR [W
m
-2]
No ECHOn-axis ECH = 0.16 = 0.30 = 0.59
Depending on ECH position
Time (s)
400
mm
20
0 m
m
100
mm
O
n-ax
is
No
ECH
Chor
d #
1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
1
161
161
161
161
16
No ECH
On-axis ECH
ECH @r/a = 0.16
0.30
0.59
Less core accumulation of Ar impurity with ECHMost effective (i.e., least core impurity concentration) with on-axis ECHLess effective with resonance layer position at larger radius
No ECH
On-axis ECH
0.16
0.30
r/a = 0.59
L-mode
15
2-D Reconstructed Ar emissivity• Core-focused reconstruction (Cormack algorithm)• Emissivity images of mainly Ar16+ & Ar17+ impurities
No ECH On-axis ECH
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.20
0.1
0.2
0.3
R (m)
I SXR (k
W/m
3 )
0.04
0.06
0.08
P SXR (k
W/m
3 )
SXR004
0.1
0.15
0.2
P SXR (k
W/m
3 )
SXR007
0.1
0.15
0.2
P SXR (k
W/m
3 )
SXR010
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
P SXR (k
W/m
3 )
SXR019
2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 3
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Time (s)
P SXR (k
W/m
3 )
SXR024
Shot #7566, Time: 2.240000 s
1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.20
0.1
0.2
R (m)
I SXR (
kW/m
3 )
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
P SXR (
kW/m
3 )
SXR004
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
P SXR (
kW/m
3 )
SXR007
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
P SXR (
kW/m
3 )
SXR010
0.02
0.04
0.06
P SXR (
kW/m
3 )
SXR019
2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 30.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Time (s)
P SXR (
kW/m
3 )
SXR024
Shot #7574, Time: 2.194000 s
1.41.6
1.82
2.2
-0.5
0
0.5
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
R (m)Z (m)
PSX
R (k
W/m
3 )
1.41.6
1.82
2.2
-0.5
0
0.5
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
R (m)Z (m)
PSX
R (kW
/m3 )
16
• With ECH, central diffusion and convection are increased.• The pinch direction reverses at r/a < 0.3.
Modification of D & V by ECH
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Diff
usio
n (m
2 /s)
r/a0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-15
-10
-5
0
Con
vect
ion
(m/s
)
r/a
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Diff
usio
n (m
2 /s)
r/a0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-15
-10
-5
0
5
Con
vect
ion
(m/s
)
r/a
Non ECH (#7566)
On-axis ECH (#7574)
Outward Inward
Inward
17
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5x 10
16
#/m
3
r/a
No ECH
Total ArAr+17
Ar+16
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16x 10
15
#/m
3
r/a
On-axis ECH
Total ArAr+17
Ar+16
◈ Radial profile of total Ar density at peak time (2.3 s)
◈ Total Ar density
r/a
Tim
e (s
)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.82.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
2.3
1
2
3
4x 1016
r/a
Tim
e (s
)
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.82.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
2.3
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16x 10
15No ECH (#7566) On-axis ECH (#7574)
Total Ar Total Ar
Hollow Ar density profile by ECH
18
Neoclassical contribution of Ar transport
No ECH (#7566)
On-axis ECH (#7574)
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Diff
usio
n (m
2 /s)
r/a
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-15
-10
-5
0
5
Con
vect
ion
(m/s
)
r/a
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Diff
usio
n (m
2 /s)
r/a
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-10
-5
0
5
Con
vect
ion
(m/s
)r/a
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
7
8
9
10x 10
-3
Diff
usio
n (m
2 /s)
r/a
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
Con
vect
ion
(m/s
)
r/a
Neoclassical calculation of D and V by NCLASS - The same input (Te, ne) of SANCO calculation - Ar16+ (dominant charge state) distribution at the peak time is used.
D, V calculated by NLCASS is smaller by an order of magnitude than the experimental D, V.
The impurity transport is anomalous, rather than neoclassical.
NCLASS
Exp
19Impurity pinch 3 impurity pinch terms[1] in Weiland multi-fluid model
Pinch type Description Pinch directionby turbulence type
Curvature pinch Compressibility of ExB drift v Inward
Thermodiffusion pinch Compression of the diamagnetic drift v ITG OutwardTEM Inward
Parallel impurity compression
Parallel compression of parallel v fluctuations produced along the field line by fluctuating
electrostatic potential
ITG InwardTEM Outward
GYRO and XGC simulations are on-going to find the dominant turbulence mode of No ECH and on-axis ECH cases.
It is expected that TEM is the dominant mode because of ECH effect on Te profile. It may be due to parallel impurity compression driven by increased R/LTe
[2]
[1] H. Nordman et al., 2011 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 53 105005 [2] C. Angioni et al.,2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 095003
Curvature pinch
Thermodiffusion pinch
Parallel compression
pinch
20Diagnostics & analysis tools ready for W injection experiment
5 - 20 nm wavelength range is mainly used for measurement of W emission spectra. ASDEX-U: VUV (~5 nm) JET: VUV (~5 nm) & SXR JT-60U: VUV (6.23 nm) LHD: EUV (6.09, 6.23 & 12.7 nm) KSTAR
- VUV (5 – 60 nm): ITER prototype- SXR
Simulation & Atomic data: SANCO-ADAS
W test particle injector under preparation/consideration Particle gun (under preparation on KSTAR) Laser blow-off system (C-Mod) Particle dropper (NSTX) Pellet injection (LHD)
21
Presentations and discussionsDesign and tomography test of Soft X-ray Array diagnostics
on KSTAR (Seung Hun LEE)
Design and tomography test of Edge Multi energy Soft X-ray Array diagnostics on KSTAR (Juhyeok JANG)
Impurity transport analysis and preparation of W injection experiments (Joohwan HONG)
Development of a tungsten injection injector for high Z impurity study (Joohwan HONG)