Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Walden University Walden University
ScholarWorks ScholarWorks
Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection
2019
Women Leaders in Information Technology: A Phenomenological Women Leaders in Information Technology: A Phenomenological
Study of Their Career Paths Study of Their Career Paths
Michelle Newsome Walden University
Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations
Part of the Databases and Information Systems Commons
This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected].
Walden University
CollegeofManagementandTechnology
Thisistocertifythatthedoctoraldissertationby
Michelle Santos Newsome
hasbeenfoundtobecompleteandsatisfactoryinallrespects,
andthatanyandallrevisionsrequiredbythereviewcommitteehavebeenmade.
ReviewCommitteeDr.RaghuKorrapati,CommitteeChairperson,ManagementFaculty
Dr.JohnKitoko,CommitteeMember,ManagementFacultyDr.LisaBarrow,UniversityReviewer,ManagementFaculty
ChiefAcademicOfficerandProvostSueSubocz,Ph.D.
WaldenUniversity2019
Abstract
WomenLeadersinInformationTechnology:APhenomenologicalStudyofTheir
CareerPaths
by
MichelleSantosNewsome
MBA,UniversityofPhoenix,2008
BS,EastCarolinaUniversity,2006
DissertationSubmittedinFulfillment
oftheRequirementsfortheDegreeof
DoctorofPhilosophy
Management
WaldenUniversity
December2019
Abstract
IntheUnitedStates,womenremainunderrepresentedinseniorlevelpositionsin
theinformationtechnology(IT)field.Despitethischallenge,afewwomenhave
successfullyascendedintoseniorleadershipinIT.Usingthesocialcognitivetheory
astheconceptualframework,thepurposeofthisqualitativetranscendental
phenomenologicalstudywastounderstandthelivedexperiencesofseniorwomen
leadersintheITfield.Theresearchquestionexploredthelivedpersonaland
professionalexperiencesofseniorwomenleadersinITtogainanunderstandingof
theircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.Throughtheuseofthe
modifiedVanKaammethodofdataanalysis,6majorthemesemergedfrom
interviewswiththe15participants.Theresultsindicatedthatself-efficacy,hard
work,andmentorshipmayhelpwomenascendintoseniorleadershipinIT.This
studymaycontributetopositivesocialchangebypromotingtheunderstandingof
theexperiencesandperspectivestrategiesforincreasingthecareeradvancementof
aspiringwomenleadersinamaledominatedindustrysuchasIT.Anincreased
understandingofwomenseniorleaders’experiencesinITcouldattractmore
women,levelingtheplayingfieldofmenandwomen.
WomenLeadersinInformationTechnology:APhenomenologicalStudyofTheir
CareerPaths
by
MichelleSantosNewsome
MBA,UniversityofPhoenix,2008
BS,EastCarolinaUniversity,2006
DissertationSubmittedinFulfillment
oftheRequirementsfortheDegreeof
DoctorofPhilosophy
Management
WaldenUniversity
December2019
Dedication
ToAnthonyandIsaac:Ihopeonedayyouwillreadmyworkandbeinspired
tofollowyourownhopesanddreams.Iloveyoubothwithallmyheart.
Acknowledgments
IwouldliketofirstthankmyLordandSavior,JesusChristforblessingme
withthewisdom,strength,andperseverancetocompletethisdissertation.Without
him,noneofthiswouldhavebeenpossible.ToJelaunNewsome,mylovingand
supportivehusband,thankyouforbelievingandencouragingmetogothroughthis
journey.ThankyouforbeingmybiggestcheerleaderwhenIgotdiscouragedand
feltlikegivingupattimes.IloveyousomuchandIcannotthankyouenoughfor
yourloveandsupport.
Iwouldliketothankmyparents,AnthonyThompsonandLuciaThompson,
forinstillingtheimportanceofeducationandbetteringmyself.IhopethatIhave
madeyouproud!VanyaAllen,thankyoufromthebottomofmyheartforpromoting
myresearchstudy.IwouldliketothanktheThompsonFamily,DimarucutFamily,
AllenFamily,NewsomeFamily,andallofmyfriendsandpeersforsupportingand
cheeringmeonthroughoutthisjourney.
Dr.DonnaBrown,mymentor,thankyouforcoachingmetobethebest
scholarpractitionerthatIcanbe.Iwillforeverappreciateandrememberyour
mentorship.Dr.RaghuKorrapati,mydissertationchair,thankyouforhelpingme
getoverthefinalhumpofmydissertationjourney.Dr.JohnKitoko,mysecond
committeemember,andDr.LisaBarrow,myUniversityResearchReviewer,thank
youbothforchallengingmetothinklikeascholarofpositivesocialchange.
i
TableofContents
ListofTables................................................................................................................................................v
Chapter1:IntroductiontotheStudy.................................................................................................1
BackgroundoftheStudy.................................................................................................................1
ProblemStatement............................................................................................................................4
PurposeoftheStudy.........................................................................................................................5
ResearchQuestions............................................................................................................................6
ConceptualFramework....................................................................................................................6
NatureoftheStudy............................................................................................................................9
OperationalDefinitions.................................................................................................................12
Assumptions......................................................................................................................................13
ScopeandDelimitations...............................................................................................................13
Limitations..................................................................................................................................14
SignificanceoftheStudy...............................................................................................................15
SignificancetoTheory............................................................................................................15
SignificancetoSocialChange..............................................................................................16
SummaryandTransition..............................................................................................................16
Chapter2:LiteratureReview.............................................................................................................18
LiteratureSearchStrategy...........................................................................................................19
ConceptualFramework.................................................................................................................20
SocialCognitiveTheory.........................................................................................................20
LiteratureReview............................................................................................................................23
ii
Women'sPerceptionsoftheITField...............................................................................24
MaleDominatedIndustry.....................................................................................................26
ConstructionIndustry.....................................................................................................28
STEMFields.........................................................................................................................29
WomeninIT...............................................................................................................................31
GenderandLeadership..........................................................................................................32
BarrierstoAdvancementforWomen.............................................................................37
Mentoring....................................................................................................................................42
ResearchMethodology...........................................................................................................45
DataAnalysis..............................................................................................................................47
SummaryandConclusions..........................................................................................................48
Chapter3:ResearchMethod..............................................................................................................51
ResearchDesignandRationale.................................................................................................51
RoleoftheResearcher...................................................................................................................55
Methodology......................................................................................................................................56
ParticipantSelectionLogic...................................................................................................56
Instrumentation........................................................................................................................58
InterviewProtocol...................................................................................................................60
ProceduresforRecruitment,Participation,andDataCollection........................60
DataAnalysisPlan....................................................................................................................61
IssuesofTrustworthiness............................................................................................................63
Credibility....................................................................................................................................65
iii
Transferability...........................................................................................................................66
Dependability.............................................................................................................................66
Confirmability............................................................................................................................66
ConfidentialityandEthicalProcedures..........................................................................67
Summary.............................................................................................................................................67
Chapter4:Results...................................................................................................................................69
ResearchSetting...............................................................................................................................69
Demographics...................................................................................................................................70
DataCollection..................................................................................................................................72
DataCollectionRecruitment................................................................................................72
DataCollectionTechnique....................................................................................................73
DataAnalysis.....................................................................................................................................74
DataCoding.................................................................................................................................75
EvidenceofTrustworthiness......................................................................................................75
Credibility....................................................................................................................................75
Transferability...........................................................................................................................76
Dependability.............................................................................................................................76
Confirmability............................................................................................................................77
StudyResults.....................................................................................................................................77
Theme1:ITIsaGoodField.................................................................................................78
Theme2:MidcareerChangetoIT.....................................................................................79
StrategiesforSuccess...........................................................................................................81
iv
Theme3:Mentors/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork.............................................82
Theme4:ResearchYourFuture........................................................................................83
Theme5:Self-Efficacy............................................................................................................85
Theme6:DifficultWork-LifeBalance.............................................................................87
Summary.............................................................................................................................................89
Chapter5:Discussion,Conclusions,andRecommendations...............................................91
InterpretationofFindings............................................................................................................92
Theme1:ITIsaGoodField..................................................................................................93
Theme2:MidcareerChangetoIT.....................................................................................94
Theme3:Mentors/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork.............................................96
Theme4:ResearchYourFuture........................................................................................98
Theme5:Self-Efficacy............................................................................................................99
Theme6:DifficultWork-LifeBalance..........................................................................101
LimitationsoftheStudy..............................................................................................................102
Recommendations.........................................................................................................................103
ImplicationsForPositiveSocialChange..............................................................................105
ImplicationsForDifferentMethods...................................................................................107
ImplicationsForPractice........................................................................................................107
Conclusions......................................................................................................................................108
References................................................................................................................................................110
AppendixA:ParticipantInvitationandConsentForm.........................................................133
AppendixB:InterviewProtocol.....................................................................................................136
v
AppendixC:SocialMediaAnnouncement..................................................................................139
vi
List of Tables
Table1.ParticipantDemographics.................................................................................................71
Table2.Themes.......................................................................................................................................79
Table3.Theme1:ITIsaGreatField..............................................................................................78
Table4.Theme2:MidcareerChangetoIT..................................................................................79
Table5.Theme3:Mentos/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork............................................82
Table6.Theme4:ResearchYourFuture.....................................................................................83
Table7.Theme5:Self-Efficacy.........................................................................................................85
Table8.Theme6:DifficultWork-LifeBalance...........................................................................87
1
Chapter1:IntroductiontotheStudy
TherearemanyreasonswhychoosingacareerinITfieldisasuitablechoice
forwoman.TheunemploymentratefortheITfieldin2013waslessthan3.6%,
whereastheoverallunemploymentratefortheentireUnitedStateswas7.4%(U.S.
DepartofLabor,2017).Inconjunction,theunemploymentrateforwomeninITwas
4.2%.Computingrelatedoccupationsisthefifthfastestgrowingsegmentsofthe
professionalworkforcethrough2022(UnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor,2016).
Fallingbehindtomanagementoccupations,IToccupationshavethesecondhighest
annualwagesofallotherprofessionaloccupationalsegments(U.S.Departmentof
Labor,2016).
DespitethepositiveadvantagesofworkingintheITfield,womenarenot
personallyattractedtothefieldofIT,whichinturniscausingfeweropportunities
forcareeradvancement.Manyresearchershavearguedtherationaleforthelimited
ofnumberofwomenintheITfield.HeilmanandHaynes(2005)statedthatmen
dominatedseniorleadershippositions.Historicalperceptionsportrayedwomenas
lackingkeyattributesrequiredofaneffectiveorganizationalleaderincludinglower
leadershipaptitude,lesseffectiveleadershipstyles,andfewerattributesfor
organizationalsuccess(Heilman&Haynes,2005;Leslie,Manchester,Dahm,2017).
Atthepresenttime,numerousissuespreventwomenfrommovingupintosenior
leadershippositions(Leslieetal.,2017).
Background of the Study
Asoneofthefastestgrowingfieldsintermsofnumberofworkersandtheir
2
respectivesalaries,thecomputingandITfieldisexpectedtogrowby12%from
2014to2024(U.S.DepartmentofLabor,2015).Duringthistime,488,500newjobs
willbeaddedfrom3.9millionjobsto4.4millionjobs(U.S.DepartmentofLabor,
2015).Thisisanopportunityforemploymentforbothmenandwomen.Women
held57%ofprofessionaloccupationsintheworkplacein2015(NationalCenterfor
Women&IT,2016).Duringthistime,thenumberofcomputingjobsheldbywomen
wasatalow26%(NationalCenterforWomen&IT,2016).Thisconcludesthat
womenarenotadvancinginthegrowthofcomputingjobsastheyareinother
professionaloccupations.
Torepresentadiverseworkforce,organizationshaveimplementeddiversity
programstoalignwiththeimplementationofTitleXIandotheremploymentlaws.
GenderdiversityinITisimportantbecauseitexpandsthequalifiedemployeepool,
improvesthebottomline,enhancesinnovation,promotesequality,andis
representativeoftheorganization’scustomerbase(NationalCenterforWomen&
IT,2014).
In1991,theGlassCeilingCommissionwasaskedbytheU.S.Departmentof
Labortoconductastudytoseehowbarriersappliedtowomenandminoritiesto
addresstheissueofdiscriminationandsexism(Cook&Glass,2016).CookandGlass
(2015),reportedthatcompanyboardsthathadmorewomeninleadership
positionssawincreasedprofitability.Thesefindingssupportthebusinessmodel
premiseofmystudythatadiverseworkforceofbothmenandwomencreates
greaterprofitabilityforacompanycomparedtoanondiverseworkforce.
3
Thetermglassceilingdescribesaninvisiblebarrierthatpreventsqualified
individuals,particularlywomenfromadvancingwithinanorganization.Ageneral
stanceonwhywomenfailtoadvanceintoseniorleadershippositionsintheITfield
isduetothelackoftalentintherecruitmentpoolduetoyearsofemployment
inequalitiescomparedwiththeirmalecounterparts(Smith,2014).Theemployment
discriminationstemsfromthefactthattheITfieldisapredominatelywhitemale
industry(Cook&Glass,2014).
Womenareoftenviewedtopossesstraitsthatalignwithcompassionfor
others,whereasmenareviewedasmoredominantandauthoritative(Lakshmi&
Peter,2015).Whetherthisisastereotypethatsocietymaintains,itstillexistsand
whenwomendonotfitthestereotypeanddisplayassertionandcontrol,itcanbe
riskyforthem.Womenwhoexhibitthesebehaviorsmaynotbeacceptedinthe
samewayasmenare;theymaybeviewedasintimidatingandalienating(Lakshmi
&Peter,2015).Assertionandcontrolareleadershipqualitiesthatareviewedby
individualsasimportantcharacteristicstopossesstobeaneffectiveleader
(Lakshmi&Peter,2015).Women,whodisplayassertionandcontrol,riskpossibly
intimidatingandalienatingothers.Thisissuemakesitchallengingforwomento
overcomeintheworkplace.
LeadersinthefieldofITarefailingtoattractmorewomentothefieldand
arehavinganevenhardertimeretainingthewomenthatarealreadyworkinginthe
field(NationalWomenCenter&IT,2014).WithashortageofwomenworkinginIT,
thechancesforthesewomenarediminishedforanorganizationforanorganization
4
toconsiderwomenforseniorlevelpositionsagainstamuchlargerpoolofmale
applicantsduetostereotypes.Agapintheliteratureexistsfromanorganizational
standpointthatdoesnotaddresswomeninseniorleadershippositionsintheIT
field(Dubow,2014).Thisstudymayassistfillingavoidinmanagementand
leadershipbyprovidingabetterunderstandingofhowwomenareabletoadvance
toseniorleadershippositionsintheITfieldandwhattheirneedsmaybe.
Problem Statement
TheriseofglobalcompetitivenesshasincreasedthedemandofIT
professionals(Major,Morganson,&Bolen,2013).AlthoughademandexistsforIT
professionalsacrosstheboard,ashortageofwomenworkersexistsinthisfield
(Majoretal,2013).WithfewerwomenaccountedforintheITfield,thisissue
createsalimitednumberofwomentoobtainseniorleadershippositionsinIT.
Womenheld26%ofprofessionalcomputingoccupationsintheUnitedStatesin
2017(NationalCenterforIT,2017).Thislowpercentageofprofessionalwomen
workingincomputingoccupationsdemonstratestheshortageofwomenintheIT
fieldandofthereasonsitlackswomenseniorleadersduetonothavingenough
talenttorecruitfrom(Jung,Clark,&Patterson,2017).
Agapintheliteratureexistsfromanorganizationalstandpointthatdoesnot
addresswomeninseniorleadershippositionsintheITfieldandhowtheyarrivedin
thosepositions(Dubow,2014).ThegeneralproblemthatIaddressedisthatofthe
percentageofwomeninIT,stillfewerwomenworkersofthatpercentagewho
achieveseniorleadershippositions(NationalCenterforIT,2017).Forwomen
5
tryingtoacquireseniorlevelpositionsinafirmcompetingwithalargernumberof
menmakesitcompetitiveforwomen.ThespecificproblemthatIaddressedinthis
studyisthatnoclearunderstandingexistsofhowwomenadvanceintoseniorlevel
leadershippositionsintheITfield(Anderson,Edberg,Reed,Simkin,&Stiver,2017;
Berdousis&Kordaki,2014;Dubow,Farmer,Wu,&Fredrickson,2013).Exploring
womenwhoarecurrentlyinseniorleadershippositionsintheITfieldwillprovide
anunderstandingoftheircareerpaths,whichmayhelpotherwomeninthefield
whowishtoenterseniorlevelleadershippositions.
Purpose of the Study
Mypurposeinthisqualitativetranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywas
tounderstandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogain
anunderstandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.In
thisstudy,IsolelyfocusedonwomenwhoworkintheITfieldandareinsenior
leadershippositions.Thephenomenonthatallwomenparticipantshadincommon
wascareeradvancementinthefieldofIT.Transcendentalphenomenological
researchfocusesontheessenceofthelivedexperiencesofpeoplewithparticipants
describingtheirownreality(Moustakas,1994).Inthisstudy,Ifilledavoidin
managementandleadershipbyprovidingabetterunderstandingofhowwomen
canadvancetoseniorleadershippositionsintheITfield.Atthepresenttime,little
tonoresearchexistsontheadvancementofwomenintoseniorleadershippositions
intheITfield(Smith,2013).Theimplicationsforthisstudymayalsofillagapin
otheradvancementfieldsforwomenbesidestheITfieldthatmightbeappliedto
6
thosesituations.Theresultsofthisstudymayassistotherwomeninterestedin
leadershippositionsintheITfieldbydescribingthewomenleaders’careerpaths
whocurrentlyareinleadershippositionsinthefield.
ResearchQuestions
Mypurposeinthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldasit
pertainedtotheirleadershipcareerpath.Theprimaryobjectiveofresearchers
usingclassictranscendentalresearchistounderstandthelivedexperiencesofan
individual.Livedexperiencescanincludeanindividual’slivedspace,livedbody,
livedtime,andlivedhumanrelations(Willis,Sullivan-Bolyai,Knafl,&Cohen,2016).
Inthisstudy,thelivedexperiencewaswithregardtothephenomenonofcareer
advancementofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Duetotheprimaryfocusof
thelivedexperiencesoftheindividualintranscendentalphenomenological
research,theresearchquestionforthisstudywasasfollows:
RQ1:Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiences
ofwomenintheircareeradvancement,whichledtothemtoachievetheirsenior
levelpositionsintheITfield?
Conceptual Framework
Aconceptualframeworkisasystemofconcepts,assumptions,expectations,
beliefs,andtheoriesthatsupportsandinformstheresearchstudy(Leamy,Bird,
Boutillier,&Williams,2011).Theconceptualframeworkexplainsinnarrativeform
themaintheoriesand/orconceptsthatwillbethefoundationofthestudysuchas
7
keyfactors,concepts,variables,orpresumedrelationshipsamongthem.The
conceptualframeworkforthisstudywasbasedonBandura’s(1986)social
cognitivetheory(SCT).Theconceptofself-efficacyisanimportantfacetwithin
Bandura’stheory.Bandura(1997)describedself-efficacyas“thebeliefinone’s
capabilitiestoorganizeandexecutethecoursesofactionrequiredtoproducegiven
attainments”(p.3).Self-efficacyisthebeliefinone’sabilitytobesuccessfulina
givensituation.Self-efficacycanbeachievedthroughmasteryexperiences,
modeling,socialpersuasion,andthephysiologicalstateofaperson(Wood&
Bandura,1989).
IntheITfield,womenaretheminoritycomparedwithmeninthefield
(Machina&Gokhale,2015).Womenworkinginmaledominatedfieldshaveto
continuouslyprovethattheyareworthytoworkwithinthe“goodoleboys”
environment.Somewomenmaylackconfidenceinthemselvestobesuccessfulin
theirjobsorcareersintheITfield.Inaddition,somewomenmaylackmotivationto
succeedintoseniorleadershippositionsbecausetheymayfeelthattheydonotfit
intothehierarchyofbeinginamale-dominatedindustry.Allthesefactorsmay
contributetoalackofself-efficacyinwomenworkingintheITfield.
IbasedthisstudyonthebeliefthatwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldhave
ahighsenseofself-efficacyforcareeradvancement.Itisimportanttounderstand
howwomeninseniorleadershippositionsviewtheirownself-efficacyaswellas
howtheyviewtheadvancementofotherwomeninIT.Anindividual’ssuccessful
performanceataccomplishingsomethingstrengthenstheirself-beliefsofhisorher
8
owncapabilities(Wood&Bandura,1989).Peopleneedsocialpersuasiontovalidate
thattheyaredoingthingsrightandorsuccessful(Wood&Bandura,1989).The
physiologicalstateofapersongreatlyaffectsaperson’sself-efficacy(Wood&
Bandura,1989).
Thesocialcognitivetheory,detailedmoreinChapter2,ispoweredby
influences,whicharederivedfrombehavior,cognition,andtheenvironment
(Dooley&Schreckhise,2016).Bandurabelievedthatanindividual’sownmindwas
anactiveforcethatcreatedone’sreality,processedinformation,performed
behaviors,andactedonthesebehaviors(Dooley&Schreckhise,2016).Reciprocity
andfeedbackallowsanindividualtogaugeifhisorherownrealityisaproductof
theirenvironment(Dooley&Schreckhise,2016).
Varioustypesofenvironmentsandsocialsystemsinfluencethehuman
behavior(Kier,Blanchard,Osborne,&Albert,2014).Theenvironmentofan
individualplaysamajorimpactonthedevelopmentandbehaviorofaperson.The
socialcognitivetheoryexplainsthatfactorssuchaseconomicconditions,
socioeconomicstatus,andeducationalandfamilystructuresaffectindividuals
directly(Kieretal.,2014).
Self-efficacyaffectseveryaspectofhumanbehavior.Byidentifyingand
understandingthebeliefsapersonholdsregardinghisorherpowertoaffect
situations,itstronglyinfluencesboththepowerapersonactuallyhastoface
challengesandmakedecisions.Thesocialcognitivetheoryisthefoundationto
9
explainhowself-efficacyisdisplayedthroughoutthecareerpathsofthewomen
seniorleaders.
Nature of the Study
Thisstudyconsistedofaclassictranscendentalphenomenologicalapproach.
Qualitativeresearchseekstounderstand,describe,andexplorebyanalyzingand
comparingdifferentaccountsinvarioussettings(Park&Park,2016).Thistypeof
researchisfocusedonappliedandtheoreticalfindingsbasedonthegivenresearch
questionthroughfieldstudyinnaturalenvironments(Park&Park,2016).
Quantitativeresearchisusedtopredictandcontrolsocialphenomena(Park&Park,
2014).Researchersmeasure,evaluate,andmakegeneralizationsofagiven
populationandencouragerepetitionofthestudyinquantitativeresearch(Gray&
Milne,2015).Aquantitativestudycannotanswerthisresearchquestionduetothe
factthatthedataoutputisnumericalinnatureandcanbeusedstatisticallyto
derivetoconclusionsaboutthedata.Whereasdatacollectionforaquantitative
studytypicallyiscollectedwiththeuseofasurveyinstrument,aqualitativestudy
usesaninterviewasitsprimaryformofdatacollection.Forthesereasons,
conductingaquantitativeresearchstudywasruledoutbasedonthestatedresearch
questionofthisstudy.
Selectingatranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasthebestoption
forthisstudybecauseIexploredthelivedexperiencesofthestatedphenomenon,
whichinthiscasewasthecareeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersintheIT
field.Phenomenologyseekstounderstandthelifeofhumanexperiencesasitis
10
lived(Moerer-Urdhal&Creswell,2014).ThephenomenonthatIstudiedwasthe
careeradvancementasexperiencedbywomenseniorleadersintheITfield.The
researchrationaleandresearchmethodologyforthisstudyisdiscussedinfurther
detailinChapter3.
Apurposefulsamplingapproachwasusedtoidentifyparticipantsforthis
study.Sixteenparticipantswererecruited;however,datafrom15participantswas
usedforthisstudy.Istartedsolicitationandrecruitmenteffortswithmycurrent
professionalnetworktoidentifywomenwhometthecriteria.Toparticipateinthis
study,theparticipantshadtomeetthefollowingrequirements:
1. FemaleseniorleadercurrentlyworkingintheITfield(Seniorlevel
positionsforthisstudyincludepresident,vicepresident,C-level
positionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chiefoperationsofficer
(COO),chiefinformationofficer(CIO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),
vicepresidentofIT(VPofIT)anddirectorandmanageriallevel
positions).
2. Workincurrentrolefor2ormoreyears.
3. LiveandworkinthecontinentalUnitedStates.
Theprimaryformofdatacollectionforthisstudywasa1-hourtelephone
interviewsthatIconducted,astheresearcher,witheachoftheparticipants.Each
prospectiveparticipantwasaskedtoreviewthe“ParticipantInvitationandConsent
Form”andreplybackthatthey“consent”tobeingincludedinthestudy.Withthe
permissionoftheparticipant,eachinterviewswasrecordedandtranscribedfor
11
transcriptionvalidation.Theinterviewprotocolincludedasemistructured
interviewandademographicquestionnaire.Iconductedmembercheckingby
emailingparticipantsacopyoftheirtranscribedinterviewwithin72hoursoftheir
completedtelephoneinterview.
Datacollectionfortranscendentalphenomenologicalstudiesisderivedfrom
first-personaccountsduringinformalone-to-oneinterviews,whicharetranscribed
andanalyzedforthemes,patterns,andcontextualmeanings(Roberts,2013).The
dataanalysiswascompletedusingthemodifiedVanKaammethodasrecommended
byMoustakas(1994),whichisdetailedfurtherinChapter3.Theresearcheriskey
inanalyzingandattachingmeaningtothelivedexperiencesandthisstudywas
throughthetranscendentalviewoftheworld.Astheresearcher,itwasimportant
thatIsetasidemypersonalfeelingsandbiastonotinfluenceparticipantsorthe
conclusionsofthestudy.Intranscendentalphenomenology,epocheistheprocessof
settingasideone’spriorjudgmentandknowledgeinordertobeopento
understandingthephenomenoninafresh,unbiasedmanner(Moustakas,1994).
Transcendentalphenomenologyisoneoftwophilosophicalassumptions
aboutexperienceandwaystoorganizeandanalyzephenomenologicaldata
(Moerer-Urdahl&Creswell,2004).Comparedwithhermeneuticphenomenology,
transcendentalphenomenologyfocusesonmeaningsthatanalyzethehuman
experience(Moustakas,1994).Transcendentalphenomenologyreductiontakes
eachexperienceandconsidersitinitssingularity,inandforitself(Moustakas,
1994).Moustakas(1994)states“thephenomenonisperceivedanddescribedinits
12
totality,inafreshandopenway”(p.33).Transcendentalphenomenologyreduction
allowstheresearchertoderiveatextualdescriptionofthemeaningsandessences
ofthephenomenon,theparticipantsthatexperiencethephenomenon,andthe
vantagepointofanopenself(Moustakas,1994).
Operational Definitions
IT:Theapplicationofcomputerstostore,study,retrieve,transmit,and
manipulatedataorinformation(Priya&Mahadevan,2013).
ITfield:Forthepurposeofthisstudy,thisincludesemployeeswiththe
followingoccupations:webdeveloper,softwaredeveloper,networkandcomputer
systemsadministrator,informationsecurityanalysts,databaseadministrator,
computerssystemsanalysts,computersupportspecialists,computerprogrammer,
computernetworkarchitect,computerandinformationresearchscientist,IT
projectmanager,chiefinformationofficers(CIO),chieftechnologyofficers(CTOs),
chiefoperationsofficer(COO),chiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),andvicepresidentofIT
(VPofIT)(U.S.BureauofLaborStatistics,2014).
Genderdiscrimination:Thepracticeoftreatingorbeingbiasedofone
particulargenderunfavorably(Baker,2014).
Glassceiling:Aninvisiblebarrierwhichismainlybasedongender
discriminationthatpreventsqualifiedindividuals,particularlywomenfrom
advancingwithinanorganization(Berrey,2014).
13
Male-dominatedindustry:Industriessuchasengineering,technology,
manufacturing,logistics,anddistribution,whichtraditionallyhiremenandare
controlledbymen(Sweida&Woods,2015).
Seniorleaders:Personswithatitleofchiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chief
operationsofficer(COO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),anddirectorand
managerialleveltitle(Priya&Mahadevan,2013;Woszczynski,Dembla,&Safar,
2016).Thesewomenareseniorleadersbecausetheyareeitherinchargeofa
company,department,andoragroupofpeoplethattheymanageandlead.
Assumptions
Aswithanystudy,specificassumptionsexistedforthisresearchstudy.I
assumedthatparticipantswouldfreelyshareanddiscusstheirpersonalwork
experiencesinacompleteandfactualmanner.Ialsoassumedthatthequalitative
methodologyusingatranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasthebest
approachtoexploretheexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Last,I
assumedthattherewouldbesomesimilaritiesincareerexperiencesofthewomen
seniorleadersthatcouldbeincorporatedintocommonthemesandcontributeto
socialchangewithincompanies.
Scope and Delimitations
Thisstudyincluded15womenseniorleaderparticipantsworkingintheIT
fieldforthepast2yearsintheUnitedStates.Seniorleadershippositionsinclude
president,vicepresident,C-levelpositionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),
chiefoperationsofficer(COO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),directorand
14
manageriallevelpositions.ThisstudywasconfinedtotheITfieldonly.
NonmanagerialwomenworkersintheITfieldwerenotconsideredforthisstudy.
Limitations
Thesamplesize,researchfindingsandissuesoftrustworthinesscontributed
tothelimitationsofthestudy.Thehonestyoftheparticipantswasthefirst
limitationofthestudy.Astheresearcher,Ihadtotrustthattheparticipantswere
beingtruthfulinsharingtheirlivedpersonalexperiencesaswomenseniorleaders
intheITfieldwithme.ToensurethatIaccuratelycapturedthelivedexperiencesin
theirownwords,Icompletedtheprocessofmembercheckingbyhavingeach
participantreviewandverifytheirinterviewtranscriptsforaccuracy.
Thesecondlimitationforthisstudywasthepurposivesamplesizeof15
participantslocatedwithinthecontinentalUnitedStates.Asamplesizeof15was
determinedtobethepointatwhichdatasaturationwouldbeachieved.Data
saturationisthepointtodiscontinuecollectingdata(Saundersetal.,2018).Data
saturationwasachievedaftertheninthparticipant,however;Icontinuedonto15
participantsasoriginallyproposedforthestudy.Thefirstnineparticipantswere
easytosecure,however;thelast6participantsweredifficulttosecure.
Thelastlimitationofthestudywastimeconstraintsoftheparticipants.Data
collectionwascompletedin42days.Coordinatingaroundtheparticipant’s
schedulesandtaskingintoconsiderationdifferenttimezonesmadeitchallengingat
timestocompletethedatacollectionprocess.Atotaloffiveprospectiveparticipants
15
expressedinterestinthestudy;however,theirworktravelscausedthemnottobe
abletocommit.
Significance of the Study
Thisstudyservestosupportpositivesocialchangeandaddressthegapin
literatureofwomenadvancingintoseniorleadershippositionsforwhichtheyare
qualifiedforinthefieldofIT.Inaddition,theresultsofthisstudymayaddresswhy
womenarenotattractedtothefieldofIT.Aqualitativestudycanaddressthegaps
inliteraturebyexamininganddescribingaphenomenon.Thephenomenonunder
studywastheessenceofthelivedexperienceofcareeradvancementofwomen.This
studymayhelporganizationsintheITfieldimprovementoring,leadership
development,andmoreefficientcareerpathstrategiesforwomeninterestedin
seniorleadershiproles.
Significance to Theory
Aspreviouslystated,thegeneralproblemthatIaddressedinthisstudywas
thelimitednumberofwomeninseniorleadershippositionsintheITfield.Withfew
womenbeingrepresentedinthefield,onecandeducethatthereareevenfewer
womenwhocurrentlyholdseniorleadershippositions.ThespecificproblemthatI
addressedisthatnotenoughisbeingdonebyorganizationstoattractwomentothe
fieldofIT,whichinturniscausingfeweropportunitiesforcareeradvancement.
Pretorius,Mawela,Strydom,deVilliers,andJohnson(2015)pointedoutthathaving
morewomeninseniorleadershippositionsmaymaketheindustryappearmore
attractivetowomen.
16
ThisresearchstudymayuncoverpossiblebarrierstoentryintotheITfield
aswellasadvancementoncealreadyworkinginthefield.Inaddition,thisresearch
studymayuncoverpossiblewaystopromotepositivewaystoprovidecareer
supporttowomeninIT.
Significance to Social Change
Thisstudymayfillavoidinmanagementandleadershipbydemonstratinga
betterunderstandingofhowwomenadvancetoseniorleadershippositionsinthe
ITfield.Atthepresenttime,littletonoresearchontheadvancementofwomeninto
seniorleadershippositionsexistsintheITfield(Smith,2013).Theimplicationsfor
thisstudymayalsofillagapinotheradvancementfieldsforwomenbesidestheIT
fieldthatmightbeappliedtothosesituations.Theresultsofthisstudymayassist
otherwomeninterestedinleadershippositionsintheITfieldbydescribingthe
womenleaders’careerpathswhocurrentlyareinleadershippositionsinthefield.
SummaryandTransition
Inthischapter,Iprovidedanoverviewoftheresearchproblem,purpose
statement,andresearchquestionsthatwillbeaddressedbythisdissertation.I
basedthisstudyonthebeliefthatwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldhaveahigh
senseofself-efficacyforcareeradvancement.Itisimportanttounderstandhow
womeninseniorleadershippositionsviewtheirownself-efficacyaswellashow
theyviewtheadvancementofotherwomeninIT.InChapter2,Idiscussboththe
socialcognitivetheoryandself-efficacyasthebasisforthestudy’stheoreticaland
conceptualframeworkfurtherintheliteraturereview.Includedinthischapterisan
17
overviewoftranscendentalphenomenologicalresearchmethodologyandthedata
analysisapproachthatIfurtherdiscussedinChapter3.Ipresenttheresultsofthe
studyinChapter4toincludethedemographicinformationoftheparticipants.Last,
inChapter5,Idiscussthedataresults,conclusions,implicationsforpositivesocial
change,andrecommendationsforfuturestudy.
18
Chapter 2: Literature Review
Inthisstudy,Iexaminedthejourneysthatwomenseniorleaderstookinthe
informationfieldtogainanunderstandingoftheircareerpathsandhowthey
advancedintototheirleadershippositions.Understandingthejourneysthatwomen
seniorleaderstookinITprovidedinsightintoareasofmanagementthatwerenot
previouslyaddressedorunderstood.Thegapintheliteraturefroman
organizationalstandpointdidnotaddresswomeninseniorleadershippositionsin
theITfield(Dubow,2014).Theriseofglobalcompetitivenesshasincreasedthe
demandofITprofessionals(Majoretal.,2013).AlthoughademandexistsforIT
professionalsacrosstheboard,ashortageofwomenworkersexistsinthisfield
(Majoretal,2013).WithfewerwomenaccountedforintheITfield,thiscreatesa
limitednumberofwomeninseniorleadershippositionsinIT.Womenheld26%of
professionalcomputingoccupationsintheUnitedStatesin2017(NationalCenter
forIT,2017).Thislowpercentageofprofessionalwomenworkingincomputing
occupationsdemonstratestheshortageofwomenintheITfieldandthereasonit
lackswomenseniorleadersduetonothavingenoughtalenttorecruitfrom.
Mypurposeinthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.Inthis
study,IfocusedsolelyfocusedonwomenwhocurrentlyworkintheITfieldandare
inseniorleadershippositions.
19
Intheliteraturereview,Idetailtherationaleforthesocialcognitivetheory
andself-efficacy,whichformedtheconceptualframeworkforthestudy.Athorough
reviewoftheliteraturediscusseswomen’sperceptionsoftheITfieldalongwiththe
prosandconsofworkinginthefield.BeingthattheITfieldismaledominated,a
briefoverviewofwomenworkinginSTEMandconstructionfieldsprovideda
comparisonforreview.NumerousbarrierstoadvancementforwomenintheIT
fieldandthiswasdiscussedindepthintheliteraturereview.Therationaleforthe
researchmethodologywasdiscussedandhowittiedinwiththeresearchquestion.
Literature Search Strategy
LimitedresearchregardingwomenseniorleadersinITexists.Mysearch
strategyfortheliteraturereviewfocusedonwomeningeneralworkinginIT.The
electronicdatabasesthatweresearchedwereBusinessSourceComplete/Premier,
Computers&AppliedSciencesComplete,ComputingDatabase,Emerald
ManagementJournals,Management&OrganizationalStudiesatSAGEFullText
collection,ProQuestDissertations&Thesis,ScienceDirect,andThoreau.Thesearch
termsusedincludedwereconstruction,dualearners,engineering,glassceiling,IT
andleadership,women,ITcareerandwomen,ITfieldandfemales,ITandgender
differences,leadership,male-dominated,male-dominatedindustries,mentoring
women,mentoringwomenandleadership,mentoringwomenandseniorleadership,
self-efficacy,self-efficacyandworkmotivation,self-efficacyandwomen,STEM,STEM
fields,andworkingwomen.
20
Searchparameterssuchaspeer-reviewedarticles,full-textarticles,and
publicationdatesbetween2014and2019wereusedfortheliteraturereview
searchinquiry.
Conceptual Framework
SocialCognitiveTheory
AsstatedinChapter1,theconceptualframeworkforthisstudywas
Bandura’s(1986)SCT.Thesocialcognitivetheoryispoweredbyinfluences,which
arederivedfrombehavior,cognition,andtheenvironment(Dooley&Schreckhise,
2016;Lyons&Bandura,2018).Bandurabelievedthatanindividual’sownmindwas
anactiveforcethatcreatedone’sreality,processedinformation,performed
behaviors,andactedonthesebehaviors(Dooley&Schreckhise,2016).Reciprocity
andfeedbackallowsanindividualtogaugeifhisorherownrealityisaproductof
theirenvironment(Dooley&Schreckhise,2016).
Varioustypesofenvironmentsandsocialsystemsinfluencethehuman
behavior(Kier,Blanchard,Osborne,&Albert,2014).Thesurroundingsofan
individualplayshasamajoreffectonthedevelopmentandbehaviorofaperson.
Thesocialcognitivetheoryexplainsthatfactorssuchaseconomicconditions,
socioeconomicstatus,andeducationalandfamilystructuresaffectindividuals
directly(Kier,Blanchard,Osborne,&Albert,2014).
Theconceptofself-efficacyisanimportantfacetwithinBandura’stheory.
Bandura(1997)describedself-efficacyas“thebeliefinone’scapabilitiestoorganize
andexecutethecoursesofactionrequiredtoproducegivenattainments”(p.3).
21
Self-efficacyisthebeliefinone’sabilitytobesuccessfulinagivensituation;itcanbe
achievedthroughmasteryexperiences,modeling,socialpersuasion,andthe
physiologicalstateofaperson(Wood&Bandura,1989).Themosteffectivewayto
developastrongsenseofself-efficacycanbedevelopedthroughmasteryexperience
(Wood&Bandura,1989).Masteryexperienceisachievedwhenapersonknowsthat
theyhaveperformedatasksuccessfully(Lyons&Bandura,2018).Thesecondmost
effectivewaytodevelopastrongsenseofself-efficacyisthroughsocialmodeling,
whichinvolvesobservinghowotherpeoplesuccessfullycompletetasks(Lyons&
Bandura,2018).Modelinggivesapersonasenseofself-efficacybecausetheyhave
seenhowataskcanbeperformedsuccessfullyiftheyfollowwhattheyhave
witnessed.
Self-efficacyisanessentialconceptinthesocialcognitivetheoryandisa
strongpredictorofcompetency.Peoplewithahighsenseofself-efficacyaremore
willingtoputintheeffortneededtocompleteataskthattheyareinterestedaswell
asdemonstratepersistencewhenpresentedwithtoughchallenges.Beingableto
correctorimproviseone’sactionswhenfacedwithachallengeorsetbackispartof
thesocialcognitivetheory.Womenwithahighsenseofself-efficacyareviewedas
competentandemergingleaders.
Inthesocialcognitivetheory,Bandurasuggestedthatmakinggoalscan
influenceaperson’scognitiveandemotionalstatebasedontheoutcomesof
reachingtheirgoals.Bandurafoundthatself-evaluativeandself-efficacytoolsare
triggeredbycognitivejudgmentthroughthemotivatingpowerofcreatinggoals.A
22
goalisaguideandamotivatorthatcanleadtoaperson’sdesiredoutcome.Goals
havemotivationaleffectsthatcanincreaseone’sself-efficacyandpersonal
satisfaction(Lyons&Bandura).
IntheITfield,womenaretheminoritycomparedtomen.Womenworkingin
maledominatedfieldshavetocontinuouslyprovethattheyareworthytoworkwith
inthe“goodoleboys”environment.Somewomenmaylackconfidencein
themselvestobesuccessfulintheirjobsorcareersintheITfield.Inaddition,some
womenmaylackmotivationtosucceedintoseniorleadershippositionsbecause
theymayfeelthattheydonotfitintothehierarchyofbeinginamaledominated
industry.Allofthesefactorsmaycontributetoalackofself-efficacyinwomen
workingintheITfield.
MystudywasbasedonthebeliefthatwomenseniorleadersintheITfield
haveahighsenseofself-efficacyintheirleadershipcapabilitiestoadvanceintheir
careers.Itisimportanttounderstandhowwomeninseniorleadershippositions
viewtheirownself-efficacyaswellashowtheyviewtheadvancementofother
womeninIT.Anindividual’ssuccessfulperformanceatgettingsomething
completedstrengthenstheirself-beliefsofhisorherowncapabilities(Wood&
Bandura,1989).Thephysiologicalstateofapersongreatlyaffectsaperson’sself-
efficacy(Wood&Bandura,1989).Peopleneedsocialpersuasiontovalidatethat
theyaredoingthingsrightandorsuccessful(Wood&Bandura,1989).Successful
workplaceperformanceevaluationsandappraisalsstrengthenaperson’sself-
efficacy(Lyons&Bandura,2018).
23
Recentresearchsupportsfindingsfrom30yearsagothatvalidatepositive
associationsofbeliefsinself-efficacyandworkperformance(Dohn,Fago,
Overgaard,Madsen,&Malte,2016;Tansey,Iwanaga,Bezyak,&Ditchman,2017;
Cetin&Askun,2018;Costley&Lange,2018;Dagenais-Desmarais,Leclerc,Dondei-
Shortall,2018;Lisbona,Palaci,Salanova,Frese,2018).Resultsofastudyprovedthat
beinghelpfultoothers,sharing,andbeingcooperativewasnegativelycorrelated
withpoorbehaviorthatresultedinexcuses,placingblameonothers,ornot
completingtasks(Galvez,Lopez-Martin,Manso,&Valle,2018).Employeeswitha
highsenseofself-efficacyareabletoovercomeobstaclesandsetbacksthey
experienceintheworkplace.Theyareabletotakepartinworkplaceopportunities
duetothefactthattheyareengaged,mindful,andhaveastrongbeliefintheir
abilities(Galvezetal.,2018).
Self-efficacyaffectseveryaspectofhumanbehavior.Byidentifyingand
understandingthebeliefsapersonholdsregardinghisorherpowertoaffect
situations,itstronglyinfluencesboththepowerapersonactuallyhastoface
challengesandmakedecisions.Thesocialcognitivetheoryandparticularlyself-
efficacywereutilizedinthisstudytoseehowself-efficacywasdisplayedthroughout
thecareerpathsofthewomenseniorleaders.
Literature Review
Inrecentyears,ithasappearedthatdiscussingwomenrightsandequalityin
theworkplacehasbeenamajortopicofdiscussion,however;littlehaschangedor
beendonetoincreasetheamountofwomeninseniorlevelpositionsespeciallyinIT
24
(Dutta&Omolayole,2016).Anextensivereviewoftheliteraturefoundthatmen
dominatesenior-levelpositionsandthattheyarethe“idealworker”(Bierema,
2016).Whenthinkingaboutleaders,womenareviewedasoutofplaceinthis
context.Theliteraturereviewuncoveredbarrierstoadvancement,stereotypes,and
variousviewpointsregardingworkingwomeninthefieldofIT.
Women’sPerceptionsoftheITField
Areviewoftheresearchrevealsthatwomenaroundtheglobeotherthanthe
UnitedStatesspecificallypursuecareersinITbecauseoftheperceivedhighstatus
associatedwithworkinginthefieldandforjobstability(Pretoriusetal.,(2015).
Pretoriusetal.(2015)revealedthatwomencurrentlyworkinginITconcludedthat
womenaroundtheworldshareaperceptionthattheindustryisfunctional,logical,
andconsistsprimarilyofprogrammingandbuildinghardware,whichisviewedas
beingamanlyjob.IntheUnitedStates,workingintheITfieldisviewedasageeky
job.InIndia,ITworkersarenotviewedasgeeks,buthighlyintelligentand
sophisticatedindividuals(Varma&Kapur,2015).Inaddition,Pretoriusetal.(2015)
revealedthatwomenfoundtheITindustrytobemale-dominatedandarehesitant
toworkinthisfieldduetothefactthatitrequireslonghours.Pretoriusetal.
(2015),compiledalistofconnotationsthatareassociatedwiththeITindustrythat
maybeconsiderednegativefactorsoraturnoffforwomenwhichincludes:
• Continuouslearningandchange
• Chaos
• Challenging
25
• Tiring/burnout
• Difficultfamily-workbalance
• Skillsetrequiresmoretask-oriented,logical,andfunctionalratherthan
peopleskills
• Frequenttravel
• Male-dominatedindustryjargon
• Highstresslevels
EducatingwomenaboutthediverseareasofITandcreatingabetter
educationalcurriculummayenticewomentoenterintotheindustry.Pretoriusetal.
(2015)suggestedthathavingmorewomeninseniorleadershippositionsmaymake
theindustryappearmoreattractivetowomen.Changingsocietalviewsonwomen
ashomemakersandcaretakerswillchangeovertime,whichwillallowwomento
jointheITworkforcewithouthavingtoworryaboutthelonghoursawayfrom
home.
Ojokoh,Adeola,Isinkaye,Abraham’s(2014)researchoffindingoutwhy
womenselectedtoworkinITalsoprovidedreasonswhysomewomenarenot
interestedinthefield.Womenrespondentsrepliedthatsomeoftheirpeersthatdid
notworkinthefieldstatedthatITinvolvedtoomuchprogramming,isstressful,
requirestoomuchmathematics,andisexpensive(Ojokohetal.,2014).Womentend
toworkinjobswheretheycaninteractwithothersandfeelasenseof
accomplishment.ThejobfunctionsinITdonotsupportthisnotionbywomen.
26
Indianresearchers,whohavecomparedandcontrastedwomeninITinIndia
andtheUnitedstatessuggestthatperhapsAmericanwomenmaynotbeattractedto
theITfieldduetothefactthattherearefewfemaleteachersinscienceand
mathematicsinschools,whichinturncausesforthelackoffemalerolemodels
(Varma&Kapur,2015).ThelackofwomenfacultyincomputerscienceintheU.S.
emphasizestheattitudethattheITfieldisnotforwomenandcausesisolation
(Varma&Kapur,2015).
ArecentstudyofUScollegestudents(Cheryan,Play,Handron,&Hudson,
2013;Sanizetal.2016)revealedthattheyviewcomputerscientistsasbeing
masculinewithmasculine-relatedcharacteristics.Computerscientistswereviewed
asbeinghighlyintelligentandnerdy,technologicalsavvy,alwaysonacomputer,
lackingsocialskills,unattractiveinphysicalappearancethatalignswithhavinga
nerdylooksuchasbeingthin,pale,orwearingglasses(Sainzet.2016).These
stereotypesaboutcomputerscientistdonotalignwithfemalegenderrolesinthe
UnitedStates.Thisstereotypemaydetersomewomenfromconsideringcomputer
scienceinthefirstplace.
MaleDominatedIndustry
Womenhaveadvancedinthefieldsoflaw,medicine,business,andbiology,
buthaveyettoadvanceinIT(Dubowetal.,2013).Notonlyhasitbeenresearched
extensively,butthereisnoquestionthattherearemoremenworkingintheITfield
comparedtowomen(Beyer,2014;Dubow&James-Hawkins,2016;Ojokohetal.,
2014;Zweben&Bizot,2016;Arnold,Summer,&George,2014,Kishore,2016,Mone,
27
2017).Thepast10yearsofresearchconcludesthattheITindustryremainsamale-
dominatedindustrythatdoesnotattractwomenduetogenderrolestereotyping,
genderstereotyping,andmisconceptionsaboutthefield(Ballard,Scales,Edwards,
2006;Lemons&Parzinger,2007;Elnaggar,2008;Wenling&Thomas,2009;Craig&
Lang,2010;Drury,2011;Mahmod&Dahalin,2012;Majoretal.(2013);Huang,&
Aaltio,2014;Machina&Gokhale,2015;Long,Segalo,&Laidlaw,2016;Jungetal.,
2017).
Scholarshavearguedthatthisunevengenderedplayingfieldcouldbedueto
thefactthatwomenseekjobpositionsthatallowthemtoworkandexpress
themselveswithothers(Pretoriusetal.,2015).Dubowetal.(2013)statedthat
womenneedtobesupportedbyotherwomeninordertogaininterestinIT.
Previousresearchfoundthatwomencomparedtomen,reportthattheyenteredin
theITfieldbecauseofateacher,familymember,orfriendwhoencouragedthem
(Ashcraft,Eger,&Friend,2012).Thissupportisbackedbyresearchfindingsby
AlbertBandura(1997)thatshowedthatindividualsneedencouragementtohelp
themfaceadversity.Theencouragementandsupportarekeyfactorsforthe
retentionofgirlsandwomenwhentheystarttohavedoubtsaboutbelonginginIT
(Dubowetal.,2013).
TheNationalCenterforWomen&IT(NCWIT)waschartedin2004asanon-
profitcommunityofapproximately900universities,companies,andnon-profits,
andgovernmentorganizations.NCWIT’smissionistocapturetheinterestofyoung
girlsandprovidesupporttowomenalreadyworkinginthefield.Despitetheon-
28
goingeffortsoforganizationssuchasNCWITandprofessionaltradeassociations
likeWomeninIT,thereisstillashortageofwomenworkinginITacrosstheboard
(Dubowetal.,2013).
Theliteraturerevieweddiscussedwomeninothermale-dominated
industriessuchasbikemessengers(Ferguson,2017),highereducationsenior
leadership(Anyikwa,Chiarelli-Helminiak,Hodge,&Wells-Wilbon,2015;BlackChen,
2015;Davis&Maldonado,2015;Block&Tietjen-Smith,2016;Johnson,2016),
accounting(Anders,2015;Barry,2017;Cimirotić,Duller,Feldbauer-Durstmüller,
Gärtner,Hiebl,2017),engineering,andconstruction(Arenaetal.,2015;Francis,
2017;Ibáñez,2017;Navarro-Astro,Roman-Onsalo,Infante-Perea,2017).Science,
technology,engineering,andMathfields(STEM)withanemphasisonthe
engineeringfieldandtheconstructionfieldwerediscussedfurthertodetailthe
barriersthatwomeninthesefieldsfacedandtoshowtheprogressthattheyhave
madesofarintheirfields.
ConstructionIndustry
Womenintheconstructionindustryfacesimilarbarrierstoadvancement
suchaswomenworkingintheITandengineeringfields(Olofsdotter&Rasmusson,
2016;Ibáñez,2017).Ibáñez(2017),statedthatwomenintheconstructionindustry
likewomenworkinginothermale-dominatedoccupationsworkinacultureof
disrespectorhazingandareexpectedtoworkjustashardasmentonotappear
weakorincompetent.QualitativeresearchconductedbyWright(2014)consistedof
womenemployeesworkingintheconstructionindustryfoundthatemployers
29
continuetoviewconstructionworkasaman’sjob.Participantsofthestudy
reportedthattheiremployersdidnotallowwomenworkerswithyoungchildrento
workthesamehoursfromstarttofinishjustliketheirmalecounterparts,
employersstatedthattheypreferredtohirelesbianconstructionworkersbecause
theyworkjustashardasmenanddonotthinkaboutgettingpregnant(Wright,
2014).Thistypeofthinkingbyanemployerputswomenwhoarenotlesbiansata
disadvantagebecausetheyareviewedasnotbeingstrongworkcandidatesifthey
haveorareconsideringhavingchildren.
Womenintheconstructionindustryfacegenderstereotyping,hostilework
environments,employerprejudice,longworkhours,andlackoffacilitysupport
suchasseparatemaleandfemalebathroomsorprivateareasforwomentopump
milkifneeded(Wright,2014).AccordingtoCha(2013),thereisanegative
associationwithoccupationsthathavelowwomenproportionsandlongwork
hours.Longworkhoursassociatedwithmale-dominatedtypeworkcontinueto
excludewomenwithchildrenfromthesepositionsfurtheringgendersegregation
(Cha,2013).
STEMFields
Researchregardingtheunder-representationofwomenintheengineering
fieldcannotbediscussedwithoutalsodiscussingscience,technology,engineering,
andmathdisciplinesandcareers.TheBureauofLaborStatistics(2014)reported
thatthefastestgrowingcareersnationallyareinSTEM.Withtheincreased
employmentopportunitiesinSTEMfields,thereisstillanunderrepresentationof
30
womenpursuingthesejobsduetotheminimalsupportandencouragementof
younggirls(NationalScienceBoard,2012).Moreresearchisneededforthesupport
ofwomeninterestedinSTEMcareersCadaret,M.C.,Hartung,P.J.,Subich,L.M.,&
Weigold,I.K.(2016).
TheunderrepresentationofwomeninSTEMcollegemajorsandcareersisa
continuousdiscussionamongscholars(Blosser,2017;Cadaretetal.,2016;Kodate,
N.,Kodate,T.,Kodate,T.,2014).Therearevaryingviewpointstowhywomenare
underrepresentedinscienceandmathfields.Oneviewpointsuggestedthatwomen
cannothandletheextensiveamountofscienceandmathclassesneededforto
obtainanengineeringdegree.Otherscholarshavearguedreasoning’stowhy
womenchosenottoenterintoSTEMfields.Blosser(2017)arguedthatwomenare
notequallyrepresentedacross
Despitethefactthat57%ofwomencomparedto43%ofmengraduatefrom
college,thereisroughlyaround18%ofwomenwhograduatewithengineeringand
computersciencedegrees(NationalScienceFoundation,NationalCenterforScience
andEngineeringStatistics,2013).InconjunctiontothelowSTEMgraduaterates,
Chen(2013)reportedthatwomenaremorelikelythanmentoswitchfromSTEM
majorstonon-STEMmajors.Cadaretetal.,(2016)reportedthatthisphenomenonof
womenswitchingfromSTEMtonon-STEMmajorisanewoccurrencethatneedsto
beresearchedmoreindepth.
31
WomeninIT
Thereisadifferentperspectivefromwomenaroundthegloberegardingthe
fieldofIT.VarmaandKapur(2015)statedthatthelackofwomenseekingIT
positionsshouldnotbeviewedasaglobalphenomenonbecausewomeninIndia
viewtheITfieldasanattractivefieldtoworkincomparedtowomenintheU.S.The
notionthattheITfieldisamale-dominatedindustryissociety-specificandnot
universal(Varma&Kapur,2015).Inthepast15years,Indiahasseenanincreasein
womenreceivingadvanceddegreesincomputersciencecomparedtotheUnited
States(Varma&Kapur,2015).Obtainingadegreeincomputerscienceandworking
intheITfieldisperceivedbytheIndiancultureaswomenfriendlyandare
consideredasacceptablejobsbytheirpeersandfamilies.WomeninIndiawith
computersciencebackgroundsareviewedasintelligentbeingthattheyareableto
handlethetechnicalaspectsofthejob,workoncomplexprojects,anduseadvanced
problemsolvingskills(Varma&Kapur,2015).WomenworkinginITpositionsare
wellpaidandhavevastemploymentopportunitiescomparedtootherfieldsinthe
country.
VarmaandKapur’s(2015)researchfoundthatwomeninIndialikedworking
inITbecausetheycanworkina“white-collarpositionatadeskinasecureindoor
office,possiblywithairconditioningandcoffee”(p.58).TheIndianfemalestudents
thatparticipatedintheirstudystatedthatissueswithrecruitmentandretentionof
womeninITisnotduetothefielditself,butfromtheirpatriarchalsocietythat
favorsmen(Varma&Kapur,2015).InIndia,workinginITisnotafieldformale
32
geeks,whichissometimestheperceptionintheUnitedStates,butisviewedbyboth
gendersasaprestigioushigh-payingjob(Varma&Kapur,2015).InIndia,women
whoworkinITbenefitfromhavinghighsocialstatusandindependenceofhavinga
highsalaryposition,whichovershadowsanypreconceptionsofteachersandgender
discrimination(Varma&Kapur,2015).VarmaandKapur’s(2015)researchfindings
differgreatlyfromthelowenrollmentandgraduationfiguresofwomeninthe
UnitedStates,whichviewsadegreeincomputerscienceasafieldsuitedforaman.
InNigeria,workinginITisaverypopularfieldtoworkindespitehavingissues
withrecruitingmorewomentothefield.Nigerianwomenareveryautonomousand
donothavetodealwithsocietalpressuresofworkinginstereotypicalcareerssuch
ashomemakers,teachers,oradministrativerolessuchassecretarialpositions
(Ojokohetal.,2014).WomenareattractedtothefieldofITinNigeriabecauseit
involvesinterestingworkthatallowsforthemtolearnnewthings,solvecomplex
problems,andallowsforcontinuouseducation,whichmakesthemappear
knowledgeableandup-to-dateonnewtechnologies(Ojokohetal.,2014).
GenderAndLeadership
Leadershipishavingtheabilitytoinfluenceandmotivateotherstodo
something.Intheworkplace,leaderstrytoinfluenceandmotivatetheirworkforce
toreachorganizationalgoalsandobjectives.Atthepresenttime,womenaccountfor
16.6%ofboardseats,14.3%ofexecutiveofficerpositions,and14.3%ofCEOroles
inFortune500companies(Catalyst,2017;Grant&Taylor,2014).Thesealarming
statisticsprovethatwomenarestillunderrepresentedinsenior-levelpositions.
33
Rincón,González,andBarrero(2017)statedthatitisafactthatwomenare
underrepresentedinseniorleadershippositionsinthewesternworld.Duetothe
factthattheITfieldconsistsofprimarilymales,thereareveryfewwomensenior
leadersintheindustryasitis.Exploringwhatmakeswomenattractedtothe
informationfieldandhowcantheyadvanceintoseniorlevelpositionsbecomesa
relevantquestion.
Womenarefacedwiththechallengesoftryingtoadvanceintheircareers
whilebeingpaidlessthanmenandhavingtoworktwiceashardtoprove
themselvesworthyinadditiontobalancingafamilylife(Bierema,2016).Thereare
manyvariablesthatconnectinaworkingwoman’slifesuchasidentity,
socialization,culture,familylife,socioeconomicstatus,education,race,ethnicity,
sexualorientation,andreligion(Bierema,2016;Hoyt&Murphy,2016).Oncea
womenentersintoaleadershipposition,shewilloftentimesexperiencethe
challengesoftryingtonotcomeoffastoomasculinewhilealsotryingto
demonstrateafirmcommitmenttotheorganization(Bierema,2016).
Previousargumentshavestatedthatmenarebettersuitedformanagement
(PonsPeregort,CalvetPuig,TuraSolvas,&Muñoz,2013;Hoyt&Murphy2016;
Rincónetal.,2017).Inaddition,ithasbeenarguedthatifthereweremorewomen
inthepipeline,morewomencanbepromotedintoleadershippositions(Pons
Peregortetal.,2013).AccordingtoReid(2015),theidealleaderisamalewhois
completelydedicatedtohiswork,putshisworkoverhisfamily,andpersonalneeds.
Bierema(2016)statedthatwomenareatadisadvantagebeforetheyeveninterview
34
forasenior-leadershippositionsduetothe“idealworker”image.Itishardfor
societytoviewwomenasidealworkerduetothefactthatwomenaretraditionally
expectedtobethecaregiversofthefamily.Thisexpectationputswomenata
disadvantageofmovingintoaseniorlevelpositionbecauseiftheyaretakingcareof
theirfamilies,theycannotpossiblyworklonghoursandshowcommitmenttothe
organizationthesamewaythatmenareableto(Eaglyetal.,2016).
GrantandTaylor(2014),arguedthatwomenhinderthemselvesfrom
advancingintoleadershippositionsbecausetheydonotknowhowtoeffectively
communicatetheiraccomplishments.Theirresearchdiscoveredsixcommunication
essentialsthatcanhelpwomenprojectconfidencewheninterviewingforleadership
positions(Grant&Taylor,2014).Thesecommunicationessentialsincludestarting
strong,stayingsuccinct,dimensionalizingcontent,owningvoice,controlling
movement,andprojectingwarmth(Grant&Taylor,2014).GrantandTaylor(2014)
suggestedthatexecutivecoachingcanhelpwomenlearnandpreparehowto
communicateandportraythemselvesaseffectiveleaderswheninterviewingfor
seniorleadershippositions.
Anotherargumentforwomenhavingdifficultiesadvancingintosenior
leadershippositionsisduetogenderstereotypes(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).When
womenarefacedwithbeingtoocommunalortooagentic,theywilloftentimes
experiencesocialidentitypossibilitieswhichcouldresultinjudgments,stereotypes,
opportunities,restrictions,andtreatmentsthataredirectlyrelatedtoone’ssocial
identity(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).AsdefinedbyHoytandMurphy(2016),stereotype
35
threatisathreatofbeingjudgedandtreatedunfairlyinsettingswherenegativeand
unfavorablestereotypesaboutone’sidentityappliesinareal-lifesetting.Women
tryingtoadvanceintoseniorleadershippositionsfaceavarietyofstereotype
threats.
Hoyt&Murphy(2016),analyzedthephenomenonofstereotypethreatfor
womeninleadership.Thisstudyanalyzedmodelsofstereotypethreat,which
focusedonindicationsofstereotypethreat,theconsequencesofstereotypethreat,
moderatorsofstereotypethreatappraisalsandresponses(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).
Themainstigmaofstereotypethreatsforwomeninseniorleadershippositionsare
decreasesinmotivationandengagement(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).Womenwhowork
inpredominatelymaledominatedindustriessuchasSTEMfieldsaremorelikelyto
experiencestereotype(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).
Womenarelabeledascommunalwithcharacteristicssuchasfriendliness,
unselfishness,sympathetic,andabletoexpressthemselveswhereasmenareviewed
asbeingagenticwithassertive,masterful,independentcharacteristics(Saniz,
Meneses,Lopez,Fabregues,2016).Womenleaderswilloftenfindthemselvesina
dilemmaiftheyaretoocommunal,whichcausesthemtobecriticizedforbeing
ineffectiveleadersornotbeingfemaleenoughiftheyaretooagentic(Eagly,Gartzia,
&Carli,2014;Hoyt&Murphy,2016).Comparedtomen,womenareviewedasbeing
morefriendlyandapproachable,caring,andgenuinelyconcernedforothers(Saniz
etal.,2016).Menareviewedasbeingassertive,competent,andindependent(Saniz
etal.,2016).Womenwhoexhibitassertionandcontrolmaynotbeacceptedinthe
36
samewayasmenare;theymaybeviewedasintimidatingandalienatinginstead
(Lakshmi&Peter,2015).Assertionandcontrolareleadershipqualitiesthatare
viewedbyindividualsasimportantcharacteristicstopossesstobeaneffective
leader(Lakshmi&Peter,2015).Women,whodisplayassertionandcontrol,risk
possiblyintimidatingandalienatingothers.Aperson’sphysicalappearance,
personalitytraits,behavior,andoccupationarefactorsthatareusedinoursociety
tomakeinferencesaboutmenandwomen(Sanizetal.,2016).Thisissuemakesit
challengingforwomentoovercomeintheworkplace.
Implicitleadership,basedontheimplicitleadershiptheoryisthe
preconceivednotionsofwhatpeoplethinkitmeanstobealeader.Preconceived
notionsregardingleadershipareoftentimesbasedonpersonalitytraits,behaviors,
andsocialidentities(Carnes,Houghton,&Ellison,2015;Hoyt&Murphy,2016;Foti,
Hansbrough,Epitropaki,&Coyle,2017).Theimplicitleadershiptheoryis
compatiblewiththepreviouslymentioned“idealworker”imagebyBierema(2016).
Leadersaretypicallyviewedasbeingwhiteandmale.Thesepreconceivednotions
automaticallyresultinbiasedperceptionsofpeoplewhodonotfittheimageofa
leadersuchasforminoritiesandwomen(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).
ScholarssuchasHeilman’s(1983&2001)lackoffitmodelandEaglyand
Karau’s(2002)rolecongruitytheoryofprejudicetowardfemaleleadershaveboth
expressedtheconceptthatwomendonotfittheimageoftheidealleader.The
femalegenderstereotypeismuchdifferentfromtheleadershiprole(Eagly&Karau,
2002&Heilman,2001).Genderstereotypesaregeneralizationsaboutthe
37
characteristicsofmenandwomenthatareviewedbysocietythancaninclude
descriptiveandprescriptivecomponents.Oneofthemostsignificantgender
stereotypesintermsofleadershipisthat“womentakecare”and“mentakecharge”
(Baker,2014;Eagly&Heilman,2016;Hoyt&Murphy,2016;Vongalis-Macrow,
2016).
Genderstereotypesunfortunatelycancausenegativeeffectsonawoman’s
career,whichcancontributetotheshortageofwomenseniorleadersinvarious
occupations(Hoyt&Murphy,2016).Womenwhoexperiencetheharmfuleffectsof
genderstereotypesearlyintheircareersmaynotaspiretoreachingleadership
positionsorpossiblyevenchangefieldstoanoccupationthatismoreacceptingor
tolerantofwomen(Edmundsetal.,2016;Hoyt&Murphy,2016).Thephenomenon
ofwomenswitchingcareersmidcareeriscurrentlybeingwitnessedintheITfield
(Way,2015).AlthoughWay’s(2015)phenomenologicalstudyof10womenwholeft
theirITcareersmidcareerdidnotspecificallyaddressgenderstereotypes,itdid,
however;findthatwomenwereleavingtheITfieldmidcareerduetoburnout,poor
work-lifebalance,andlackofmeaningintheirwork.Furtherstudyonthefactors
forwomenleavingITcareersinmidcareercouldprovidefurtherinsightthatshould
beconductedtofurtheranalyzethesefactors.
BarrierstoAdvancementForWomen
Therearemanybarrierstoadvancementthathinderwomenfromobtaining
seniorleadershippositionsintheirchosenfield(Elprana,Felfe,Stiehl,Gatzka,2015;
Rinconetal.,2017).Thelackofwomeninseniorpositionsmakesitevenmore
38
difficultforotherwomentoenterintoseniorlevelpositions(Howe-Walsh&
Turnball,2016).This,initself,isamajorbarriertoadvancementthatalthoughis
obvious,itcaneasilybeoverlookedasabarrier.Withthisbeingsaid,itishardfor
womenintheITfieldtoadvanceintoseniorleadershippositionswhenthereare
fewwomencurrentlyholdingthesepositionsnow.
Thework-familyroleconflictisamajorbarrierthatinhibitswomentryingto
obtainjobsandforwomentryingtoadvanceintoseniorleadershippositionsin
theirchosenfieldandparticularinmedicine,engineering,andtechnology(Uzoigwe,
Low,&Noor,2016).Uzoigweetal.,(2016)statedthatfactorssuchaslongwork
schedules,extensiveovertime,beingon-call,havingyoungchildren,beingpartofa
largefamily,takingcareofagingparents,andlivinginahouseholdwhereboth
spouseswork,genderroleideology,jobdemand,andworkoverloadallaffectthe
work-familyroleconflictexperiencedbywomen.Quantitativeresearchof42
medicaldoctors,54engineers,and77ITprofessionalsinNigeriabyUzoigweetal.,
(2016)concludedthatworkfactorsaffectthework-liferoleconflictmoresothan
familyfactors.Manypeoplewouldassumethathavingtocareforyoungchildren
wouldaffectawomen’scareeradvancement,however;inNigeria,familieslivein
extendedfamilysystems.Inthistypeoffamilyenvironment,marriedcoupleslivein
thesamehouseastheirparentsandpotentiallyauntsanduncles,andsiblings.This
typeoffamilysystemminimizeschildcaredilemmasforwomenastheyhave
relativesathomethatcancareforthechildren.
39
Althoughithasbeenresearchedextensivelyinbothacademiaandin
business,theglassceilingphenomenonisstillamajorbarrierforwomenespecially
inIT(UnitedStatesGlassCeilingCommission,1995;Berry,2014;Cook&Glass,
2013;Ezzedeen,Budworth,&Baker,2015;Fernadez&Campero,2017;Hennessey,
MacDonald,&Carroll,2014;Hurley&Choudhary,2016;Jafarey&Maiti,2015;
Javdani,2015,Ng&Sears,2017;Omran,Alizadeh,&Esmaeeli,2015;Sabharwal,
2013;Sahoo&Lenka,2016;Subramaniam,Khadri,Maniam,&Ali,2016).Thereare
numerousargumentsthatsuggestthattheglassceilingexistsbecauseofthe
differenceintheneedsofmenandwomen(Liu,2013;Alsono-Almedia,2014).The
reasonforthisargumentderivesfromthefactthatwomenmaynotbeinterestedin
ascendingthecorporateladderbecausetheymaybecontentwiththeirjob
functionsthatallowthemtointeractwithothers(Liu,2013).Theoverallhuman
connectionismorevaluablethanpossessingpowerthatcomeswithbeingina
seniorleadershipposition(Liu,2013).
Glassceilingbarrierscanbedividedintotwocategories:personalchallenges
andworkchallenges(Subramaniametal.,2016).Personalchallengeswouldconsist
offamilyobligationsanddemographicfactorswhereasworkchallengeswould
consistoflongworkhours,workculture,oradvancementopportunities.Inastudy
of300workingwomenbySubramaniametal.,(2016),womenreportedthatthey
feelsecureandacceptedwhentheirorganizationsareunderstandingofpersonal
andworkchallengesthataffectthem.Thiscreatesapositiveorganizationalculture
thatsignificantlyaffectscareeradvancement.Womenwhofeelvaluedand
40
appreciatedaremorepronetobecominginterestedinseniorleadershippositions,
desiretomoveupthecorporateladder,andobtainadditionaleducationtomake
themmorecompetitiveintheworkplace(Subramaniametal.,2016).
Barrierstoadvancementforwomenexistonvariouslevelsofsocietysuchas
individual,organizational,andsocietal(Diehl,2014;Liu,2013).Liu(2013)and
EaglyandCarli(2007),arguedtheconcretewall,theglassceiling,andlabyrinthare
threechallengesthatthatpreventwomenfrommovingupwardsintheircareers.
Balancingworkandfamilyresponsibilitiesisabarrierthatpreventswomenfrom
advancingonanindividuallevel(Diehl,2014;Socratous,Galloway,&Kamenou-
Aigbekaen,2016).Organizationalbarriersincludetokenism-orbeingtheonlyone,
beingexcludingfrominformalnetworks,lackofmentorshipopportunities,lackof
sponsorshipsalaryinequalities,genderdiscrimination,andworkplaceharassment
(Diehl,2014;Ibanez,2017).Onasocietallevel,barrierstoadvancementincludea
woman’sculture,thestereotypethatleadershipisdeemedasmasculine,andgender
stereotyping(Diehl,2014).
Workplacepracticessuchasabiasedhumanresourcesdepartment,
selection,traininganddevelopment,appraisals,andselectioncanworkagainst
women(Liu,2013).Previouspeer-reviewedresearchprovesthatwomenaremore
likelytobeexcludedfrommanagementtrainingprograms,asleadershiprolesare
deemedasbeingmasculine(Araujo-Pinzon,Alvarez-Dardet,Ramon-Jeronimo,
Florez-Lopez,2016)
41
AresearchstudybyDiehl(2014)capturedtheadversitiesandbarriersthat
womeninseniorleadershippositionsinhighereducationfacedthroughouttheir
careers.JustliketheITindustry,thehighereducationfieldalsolacksagreatdealof
womenseniorleaders.Theresultsofthisstudyconcludedthatthereisan
opportunityforgrowthforthosewhoareabletoovercomeadversityandother
barrierstoadvancement.Havingperspectiveallowedthewomenparticipantsto
turnnegativesituationsintopositiveonessothattheycouldmoveforwardwith
theircareeraspirationsandgoals(Diehl,2014).Someseniorleadershippositions
requireanindividualtobeinthepublicspotlight.Diehl(2014),concludedthat
womenseniorleaderswhowereabletomaintaintheirprivacytoaselectfewin
theirpersonalandprofessionalnetworkswereabletomaintaintheirpowerand
influenceatwork.
Veryfewstudieshavebeenconductedtoexplorehowwomen,themselves,
feelabouttheglassceiling.Resignation,acceptance,resilience,anddenialare
factorsthatwereidentifiedbySmith,Crittenden,andCaputi(2012)thatrelateto
women’sattitudesregardingtheglassceilingphenomenon.Havingresignationwas
oneofthekeyreasonswhywomengiveintoorganizationalandsocietalbarriers
thathinderthemfromadvancingintheircareers(Smithetal.,2012).Somewomen
acknowledgethatorganizationalbarriersexists,however;theyacceptthefactthat
theydonotneedtobeinaseniorleadershippositionsandnevermoveupintheir
careersbecausetheygaveup(Smithetal.,2012).Somewomendonotacknowledge
thattheglassceilingexistsbecausetheypossessresiliencethatallowedthemto
42
persevereinascendingintohigherpositions(Smithetal.,2012).Allinall,glass
ceilingbarriersgoagainstthecommonnotionthateducation,dedication,andhard
workwillleadtoabetterlifeintheAmericansociety.
Mentoring
Angel,Killacky,andJohnson(2013)statedthattheshortageofmentoringas
oneofthemainfactorsforthedeficiencyofwomenadvancingintosenior
leadershippositions.Over70%ofFortune500companiesusementoringtorecruit,
advance,andmaintaintheirtalentpoolsofmenandwomen(Kovnatska,2014).
Mentoringiscommonlydefinedasaprofessionalrelationshipwithsomeonewho
hasexperience(mentor)thattrainsandassistsanewprofessional(mentee)by
providingknowledgeandinsightthatwillallowthementeetogrowprofessionally
andpersonally.Tareef(2013)statedthatmentoringrelationshipsformwhena
moreskilledprofessionalactsasinasupportingandconsultingroletoanother
personwhoislessexperiencedinthefield.Theconceptofmentoringcanbe
witnessedinGreekmythologyinHomer’sOdyssey(Kovnatska,2014).Mentorwas
anelderteachertoKingOdysseuswhowasentrustedhishouseholdtohimwhilehe
wasfightingintheTrojanWar.Duringthistime,Mentorbecameateacherand
advisortoKingOdysseus’sonTelemachus.Overtime,thewordmentorevolvedto
meanteacher,friend,andadvisor.
Mentoringisoftenintertwinedwithcorporatemanagementtraining
programs,however;managementtrainingprogramsaremorefocusedonlearning
skillsforthespecificjobthattheywillbedoingaswellaslearningaboutthe
43
companytheyareworkingfor.Asamutualrelationship,mentoringtakesplaceover
timewithscheduledinteractionssetbythementorandmentee(Haggard,2012&
Ambrosetti,2014).
Thethreemaintypesofmentoringthatcansupportaperson’spersonaland
professionalaspirationsarepeermentoring,familysupportmentoring,and
collaborativementoring.Researchdemonstratesthattherearenumerous
advantagestopeermentoring,whicheventuallyleadstoincreasedleadership
opportunities.Menteeshavestatedthattheypossessahighersenseofconfidencein
theirabilitiesduetobeingmentoredbyaprofessionalintheirindustry(Bynum,
2015).Also,menteeshavereportedthattheyhaveabetterunderstandingof
industryapplicationsandinsightaswellasamuchbetterunderstandingto
personalandprofessionalcareergrowthandaspirations(Bynum,2015).
Peermentoringisverycommonintheworkplaceasthementororeventhe
menteecanseekoutsomeonewhoisinasimilarjobpositionorisaroundthesame
age.Sharingprofessionalandpersonalsimilaritiescanmakeiteasierforthe
mentor-menteerelationshiptoconnectwitheachother.Havingapeermentorcan
providecomforttothementeewhomaybenewtoajobfunction,department,or
organizationasawhole.Thistypeofrelationshipcanprovidemoralsupportwhen
tryingtobalancepersonalandprofessionalresponsibilities(Bynum,2015,Russoet
al.,2017).
Outofthethreetypesofmentoringstructures,womenhaveidentifiedthat
familymentoringprovidesthemwiththemostencouragementandsupport
44
(Bynum,2015).Womenwhoaremarriedreportedthatthesupportoftheirspouse
helpedthemindealingwithseparationandisolationwhenstartingnewjob
positions(Bynum,2015).Familymembersmaynotunderstandthetasksofajob,
buttheyareabletoprovideencouragementandsupport(Russo,etal.,2017).
Mentoringhasevolvedtotakeplacein-personface-to-face,overthe
telephone,orevenvirtuallywiththeuseofweb-basedcommunicationsapplications
duetotimeconstraintsandworkinginamoreglobalizedsociety.Amoreglobalized
societyallowsforanewconcept,collaborativeorgroupmentoring.Collaborative
mentoringallowsformorethanoneprofessionaltomentorthelessexperienced
mentee.Thistypeofmentoringallowsforthediversityinworkingwithvarious
mentors.Thementeeisabletogetawidevarietyofviewpointsandsupportfrom
havingmorethanonementor.Collaborativementoringconsistsofcollaboration,
shareddecisionmaking,andsystemsthinking(Bynum,2015;Kochan&Trimble,
2000).Menteeswhohavetakenpartincollaborativementoringaresaidtopossess
dominanttraitsoftransformationalleadership(Kuchynkova,2013).Womenare
reportedtobemorepronetobetransformationalleaderscomparedtomen.
Althoughtherehasbeenalittletonoresearchregardingthementoringof
seniorwomenwhoworkintheITfield,othermaledominatedfieldssuchashigher
educationadministrationisadvocatingforthepositivebenefitsofmentoringfor
womenwhoaspiretoreachhighereducationleadershippositions.Inorderfor
highereducationalinstitutionstoberelevant,theymusttrynewformsof
45
leadership,whichmayrequirethemtoconsidernewleaderssuchaswomen(Block
&Tietjen-Smith,2016;Hannah,Muhly,Schockley-Zalaback,&White,2015).
BlockandTietjen-Smith(2016)arguedthatthereisashortageofwomen
seniorleadersandinparticular,inthehighereducationadministrationfield
becausethereisalackofsame-genderrolemodelstobementors.Thisargument
coincideswithapreviouslymentionedargumentbyHowe-Walsh&Turnball
(2016),whichstated“thelackofwomeninseniorpositionsmakesitevenmore
difficultforotherwomentoenterintoseniorlevelpositions”.Insimplerterms,one
candeducethatwomenarenotgoingtobeattractedtoaparticularjoborfieldif
therearenototherwomendoingthistypeofwork.Thesocialcognitivetheory
concludesthatpeoplewillmimicandfollowbehaviorsthattheyhavelearnedin
theirsocialenvironment.ItisdifficultforwomentogravitatetothefieldofITif
therearenototherwomeninhighernumbersdoingthistypeofwork.
ResearchMethodology
Whenconsideringthechoiceofresearchmethodologytogowith,whetherit
isqualitativeorquantitative,variousfactorssuchasthelogicbehindeachmethod
wascritical.Theresearchmethodologyismuchwiderthantheresearchapproach
thatwillbeusedforthestudy(Vagle,2014).Thisresearchstudyutilizeda
qualitativemethodologywithatranscendentalphenomenologicalapproach.
Qualitativeresearchseekstounderstandandexplorebyanalyzingandcomparing
differentaccountsinvarioussettings(Park&Park,2016).Thistypeofresearchis
46
focusedonappliedandtheoreticalfindingsbasedonthegivenresearchquestion
throughfieldstudyinnaturalenvironments(Park&Park,2016).
Quantitativeresearchisusedtopredictandcontrolsocialphenomena(Park
&Park,2014).Researchersmeasure,evaluate,andmakegeneralizationsofagiven
populationandencouragerepetitionofthestudyinquantitativeresearch(Gray&
Milne,2015).Forthesereasons,conductingaquantitativeresearchstudywasruled
outbasedonthestatedresearchquestionofthisstudy:Whatistheessenceofthe
livedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesofwomenintheircareeradvancement,
whichledtothemtoachievetheirseniorlevelpositionsintheITfield?Theresearch
questionseekedtounderstandandexplorehumanbehavior,whichare
characteristicsofqualitativeresearchthatallowedtheresearchertoconduct
interviewsfortheunderstandingofattitudesandopinions.
Phenomenologyseekstounderstandthelifeofhumanexperiencesasitis
lived(Moerer-Urdhal&Creswell,2004).Thephenomenonthatwasstudiedwasthe
careeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Transcendental
phenomenologyisoneoftwophilosophicalassumptionsaboutexperienceandways
toorganizeandanalyzephenomenologicaldata(Moerer-Urdahl&Creswell,2004).
Hermenuticalphenomenologystudiesthelivedexperiencesastheyarerevealedin
consciousness.Thistypeofphenomenologyismoredescriptivethaninterpretive
liketranscendentalphenomenology(Vagle,2014).Comparedtohermeneutic
phenomenology,transcendentalphenomenologyfocusesonmeaningsthatanalyze
thehumanexperience(Moerer-Urdahl,1994).Transcendentalphenomenology
47
reductiontakeseachexperienceandconsidersitinitssingularity,inandforitself
(Moustakas,1994).Moustakas(1994)states“thephenomenonisperceivedand
describedinitstotality,inafreshandopenway”(p.33).Transcendental
phenomenologyreductionallowstheresearchertoderiveatextualdescriptionof
themeaningsandessencesofthephenomenon,theparticipantsthatexperiencethe
phenomenon,andthevantagepointofanopenself(Moustakas,1994).
DataAnalysis
Moustakas(1994)recommendedthemodifiedStevick-Colaizzi-Keenmethod
andthemodifiedVanKaammethodfordataanalysisofphenomenologicalstudies.
ThefollowingstepsareincludedinthemodifiedStevick-Colaizzi-Keenmethodas
recommendedbyMoustakas(1994):
1. Considertheimportanceofthedescriptionoftheexperiencefrom
eachstatement
2. Recordallimportantstatements
3. Listeachinvariantmeaningsoftheexperience
4. Relateandclustertheinvariantunitsintothemes
5. Synthesizetheinvariantmeaningsandthemesintodescriptions
6. Reflectonyourowntexturaldescriptions
7. Createatextural-structuraldescriptionofthemeanings
ThefollowingstepsareincludedinthemodifiedVanKaammethodas
recommendedbyMoustakas(1994):
48
1. Listandgroupallcompletedtranscriptsthatareobtainedduringdata
collection
2. Clusterthedataintoinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemes
3. Identifyinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemesinorderto
organizethegroupingstranscribedfromtheinterviews
4. Formtextural-structuraldescriptionsofthemeaningsandessences
oftheexperiencemergingboththeinvariantconstituentsandthemes
5. Usethethemestodeterminethemeaningofthelivedexperiences
thatinvolvedthekeyfindingsandrecommendationsforthestudy.
ThemodifiedVanKaammethodallowsforthedatatobereviewedasawhole
comparedtothemodifiedStevick-Colaizzi-Keenmethodthatanalyzeseach
statementindividuallytoproducethemesandpatterns.ThemodifiedVanKaam
methodwillbeusedtoanalyzethedataforthisstudy.
Summary and Conclusions
ThischapterprovidedadetailedreviewoftheliteratureonITfield,male
dominatedindustries,STEMcareers,andwomeninleadership.Thereviewincluded
adiscussionofthesocialcognitivetheoryandself-efficacy,whichwasthe
conceptualframeworkusedforthestudy.Theliteraturesupportedtherationale
andreasoningforthisresearchstudy.Anextensivereviewoftheliterature
supportedthatwomenandespeciallywomenintheITfieldareunderrepresentedin
seniorleadershippositions.
49
Womenandmenhavedifferentleadershipstylesandtraits.Ithasbeen
arguedthatwomenareunderrepresentedinseniorlevelpositionsduetotheir
leadershipstyles(Hoyt&Murphy,2016;Rincónetal.,2017).Menareproneto
prioritizetheirleadershipapproachesprimarilybyfocusingonthetaskathand,
whereaswomentendtofocusmoreonpeopleandrelationships.Maletask-focused
leadershipwasviewedasmoreprominentandvisiblebyotherswhereasfemale
people-focusedleadershipwasviewedasasupportingrole(Rincónetal.,2017).On
theotherhand,researchershavesuggestedthateffectiveleadershipinvolvesa
combinationoftraitsfrombothmenandwomensuchasinspiringandmotivating
people,abilitytopersuadeothers,empathy,integrity,risk-taking,andintelligence
(Hoyt&Murphy,2016;Rinónetal.,2017).
Thisstudyfilledavoidinmanagementandleadershipbydemonstratinga
betterunderstandingofhowwomenareabletoadvancetoseniorleadership
positionsintheITfield.Atthepresenttime,thereislittletonoresearchonthe
advancementofwomenintoseniorleadershippositionsintheITfield(Smith,
2013).Theimplicationsforthisstudymayalsofillagapinotheradvancementfields
forwomenbesidestheITfieldthatmightbeappliedtothosesituations.Theresults
ofthisstudymayassistotherwomeninterestedinleadershippositionsintheIT
fieldbydescribingthewomenleaders’careerpathswhoarecurrentlyinleadership
positionsinthefield.
Chapter2providedanexhaustivereviewoftheliterature,whichuncovered
barrierstoadvancement,stereotypes,andvariousviewpointsregardingworking
50
womeninthefieldofIT.TheconstructionandSTEMfieldswereanalyzedinthe
literaturereviewtodemonstratesimilaritieswomenfaceinothermaledominated
fields.Chapter3providesamoredetailedexplanationofwhyaqualitativestudy
wasselectedoveraquantitativestudy,aclearunderstandingofhowthe
participantswereselected,howthedatawascollectedandanalyzed.
51
Chapter 3: Research Method
Mypurposeinthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.I
focusedonwomenwhocurrentlyworkintheITfieldandareinseniorleadership
positions.Ibeginthischapterwithprovidingtherationaleforselectingtheresearch
designfollowedbyadetaileddiscussionofthetranscendentalphenomenological
approach.Next,theroleoftheresearcherandtheresearchmethodologyare
addressed.Theresearchmethodologyincludesparticipationselectionlogic,
samplingstrategy,instrumentation,interviewscript,demographicquestionnaire,
andproceduresforrecruitment,participation,anddatacollection.Thechapter
concludeswithanaddressofissuesoftrustworthinessandethicalprocedures.
Research Design and Rationale
Mypurposeinthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.The
primaryobjectiveofclassictranscendentalphenomenologicalresearchisto
understandthelivedexperiencesofanindividual.Livedexperiencescanincludean
individual’slivedspace,livedbody,livedtime,andlivedhumanrelations(Willis,
Sullivan-Bolyai,Knafl,&Cohen,2016).Inthisstudy,thelivedexperiencewasin
regardtothephenomenonofcareeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersintheIT
industry.Duetotheprimaryfocusofthelivedexperiencesoftheindividual,
52
transcendentalphenomenologicalresearchseekstoanswertheresearchquestion,
whichwas:
RQ1:Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiences
ofwomenintheircareeradvancement,whichledtothemtoachievetheseniorlevel
positionsintheITfield?
Selectingatranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasthebestoption
forthisstudybecauseitenabledtheexplorationofthelivedexperiencesofthe
statedphenomenon,whichinthiscasewasthecareeradvancementofwomen
seniorleadersintheITfield.Lebenswelt(lifeworld)isaconcept,whichmeansthe
worldofeverydaylivedexperiencesistheprimaryfoundationofphenomenological
studies(Anosike,Ehrich,&Ahmed,2012).Thephenomenologicaldesignwasused
toanalyzeanindividual’slifeworldastheparticipantsharestheirexperienceswith
thephenomenonunderstudy(Gill,2014).
Hermeneuticphenomenologyandtranscendentalphenomenologyaretwo
philosophicalassumptionsaboutexperiencesandwaystoorganizeandanalyze
phenomenologicaldata(Moerer-Urdahal).Theprimaryfocusofhermeneutic
phenomenologyistheinterpretationofthemeaningsofthelivedexperiencesofthe
participants(Gill,2014).Gill(2014)statedthataparticipant’scultureandtraditions
developthebasisforunderstandinglivedexperiences.Aninterpretiveapproachto
studyinghumanexistencerefutesthelikelihoodoffullyisolatedreflectionand
therebydisputesHusserl’s(2012)ideaofbracketingpresuppositionstoarticulate
anessence.
53
Comparedtohermeneuticphenomenology,transcendentalphenomenology
focusesonmeaningsthatanalyzethehumanexperience(Moerer-Urdahl,1994).
Transcendentalphenomenologyreductiontakeseachexperienceandconsidersitin
itssingularity,inandforitself(Moustakas,1994).Moustakas(1994)stated“the
phenomenonisperceivedanddescribedinitstotality,inafreshandopenway”
(p.33).Transcendentalphenomenologyreductionallowstheresearchertoderivea
textualdescriptionofthemeaningsandessencesofthephenomenon,the
participantsthatexperiencethephenomenon,andthevantagepointofanopenself
(Moustakas,1994).Transcendentalphenomenologyhasthecharacteristicsof
descriptive,findingessences,usingareductionmethod,andintentionality(Giorgi,
2010).
Thenarrativeapproachwasnotasuitablefitforthisstudybecauseitfocused
onstoriestoldbytheparticipantabouttheirexperiencestheyfacedthroughouthis
orherlifetime.Thistypeofstudyissuitableforstudiesthatinvolvebiographical
researchwiththeassumptionthatpeopleorganizetheirlivedexperiencesinto
stories(Hamilton,Cruz,&Jack,2017).Duetotheextensivestorytellingneededto
collectdata,thenarrativeapproachistypicallylimitedtooneortwoparticipants.
Afterreviewingthecomponentsofthenarrativeapproach,thetranscendental
phenomenologicalapproachwasamoresuitableoptionbecausemoreparticipants
canbeselectedtoprovideinsightintotheirlivedexperiencescomparedtoasample
sizeofoneortwoparticipants.
54
Ethnographyfocusesongroupswithasharedcultureorpatterns(Sohn,
2017).Thisapproachiscommonlyusedinthefieldsofanthropologyandsociology.
Datacollectionistypicallyconductedinthenaturalsettingsoftheparticipants.The
ethnographyapproachdidnotworkforthisstudybecauseitrequiredagreatdealof
timeinthefieldandfailedtoanswertheresearchquestionconcerningthelived
experiencesofwomenseniorintheITfield.
Beingthattherewasnotareal-worldcaseavailabletoanalyze,acasestudy
couldnothaveworkedtounderstandthelivedexperienceofwomenseniorleaders
intheITfield.Casestudiesarecommoninthefieldofpsychology.Participantsmay
includeacompany,group,program,oranissue(Tsang,2013).Datacollectionis
obtainedbyconductingnumerousinterviews,fieldobservation,andanalyzing
internaldocuments,artifacts,andreports(Tsang,2013).
Last,thegroundedtheoryapproachwasnotsuitedforthisstudyasthegoal
ofthistypeofstudyistodevelopanewtheorygroundedintheresearch.A
researcherusingthegroundedtheorymustadoptanaturalisticandinterpretive
stancetotheworld(Staller,2012).Thegroundedtheoryapproachrequiresalarge
populationsizeandendswithagroundedhypothesisthatundergoesadditional
testing,whichcanbequalitativeorquantitative(Cunliffe,2011).
Thetranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasselectedforthisstudy
becauseitisbestsuitedtoassistinansweringresearchquestion:Whatisthe
essenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesofwomenintheircareer
advancement,whichledtothemtoachievetheirseniorlevelpositionsintheIT
55
field?Aquantitativestudycannotanswerthisresearchquestionduetothefactthat
thedataoutputisnumericalinnatureandcanbeusedstatisticallytoderiveto
conclusionsaboutthedata.Whereasdatacollectionforaquantitativestudy
typicallyiscollectedwiththeuseofasurveyinstrument,aqualitativestudyutilizes
aninterviewasitsprimaryformofdatacollection.Thetranscendental
phenomenologicalapproachenabledtheresearchertobeabletoconduct
semistructuredinterviewstolearnabouttheparticipant’slivedexperiences.
Role of the Researcher
Myroleasaresearcherduringthisstudywastobeaninterviewerand
observerwhilebeingfairandobjectiveduringtheentireprocess.Irecruitedthe
participantsforthisstudythroughmypersonalLinkedInnetwork.Ichoose
potentialresearchparticipantswhoIhavenotpersonallyworkedwith,managed,or
havebeeninchargeofadepartmentthatmayhaveincludedtheparticipant.
Epocheistheprocessofsettingasideone’spriorjudgmentandknowledgein
ordertobeopentounderstandingthephenomenoninafresh,unbiasedmanner
(Moustakas,1994).ItwasimportantthatIsetmyownpersonalfeelingsandbias
asidesothatitdidnotaffectthedatacollectionordataanalysis.Inordertosetmy
personalfeelingsandbiasasideduringthestudy,Iusedjournalingtodocumentmy
personalreflectionswitheachparticipant.Journalingisusedbyresearchersto
eliminatebiasduringandafterinterviews(Spowart&Kairn,2014).
56
Methodology
Participant Selection Logic
Inthisstudy,theparticipantswerepurposefullyselectedbasedonthefact
thattheywouldbeabletoanswertheresearchquestion.Inpurposivesampling,
subjectsareselectedbasedoncertaincharacteristics(Patton,1990,pg.169-186).
Participantsforthisstudyhadtomeetallofthefollowingrequirementsinorderto
participateinthisstudy:
1. FemaleseniorleadercurrentlyworkingintheITfield(Seniorlevel
positionsforthisstudyincludepresident,vicepresident,C-level
positionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chiefoperationsofficer
(COO),chiefinformationofficer(CIO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),
vicepresidentofIT(VPofIT)anddirectorandmanageriallevel
positions)
2. Workincurrentrolefor2ormoreyears
3. LiveandworkinthecontinentalUnitedStates
Polkinghorne(1989)recommendedthat5to25participantsbeinterviewed
whohaveallexperiencedthephenomenonhowever,thereisnotanyoneset
numberofparticipantsotherthansuggestedsizes.Atargetsamplesizeof15was
determinedformystudytoreachdatasaturation,whichisthepointatwhich
participantsstartrepeatingthesameorsimilarresponsestointerviewquestions.
Datasaturationisthepointtodiscontinuecollectingdata(Saundersetal.,2018).
FuschandNess(2015)positedthatthequalityoftheresearchisaffectedifdata
57
saturationisnotreached.Iwillknowthatdatasaturationhasbeenreachedwhen
participant’sexperiencesthemesduringthedatacollectionprocessstarttorepeat
themselves.Participantswererecruitedviaprivatechatmessagingthroughmy
personalLinkedInnetwork.
Othersamplingstrategiesthatwereconsideredforthistranscendental
phenomenologicalstudywerequotasamplingandsnowballsampling.Forquota
sampling,participantquotasaresetinadvancedsothattheresearchercantargeta
setpopulationfordatacollection.Snowballingsamplingreliesoncurrent
participantstorecommendpotentialparticipantstotheresearcher.Thissampling
strategywasnotsuitableforthisstudybecausetherewasagreatdealof
uncertaintyinknowingiftherewillbeenoughparticipantstointerview.
Selectingapurposefulsamplewasthebestfitforthisstudytoanswerthe
researchquestion:Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonal
experiencesofwomenintheircareeradvancement,whichledtothemtoachieve
theirseniorlevelpositionsintheITfield?Apurposefulsampleenabledmetoselect
participantsthatweremostaffectedbyaspecificissue(Valerioetal.,2016).
UponIRBapprovalfromWaldenUniversity,IsentLinkedInmessenger
invitestoprospectiveparticipantstothestudy(seeAppendixA).Prospective
participantswereidentifiedandsolicitedwithinmyprofessionalsocialmedia
networksinLinkedIn.OnLinkedIn,Ireviewedthejobfieldsofthewomenthatwere
alreadyincludedinmypersonalnetwork.Icontactedthefirst30womenviathe
LinkedInmessagesystemwithaninvitationtoparticipateinthestudy(see
58
AppendixA).ThirtyisarandomnumberthatIpickedknowingthatsome
individualsmayormaynotreplytotheinvitation.Oncesevendayshadpassed,I
sentoutnewinvitestoanewgroupofprospectiveparticipantsifnoreplieswere
madefromthepreviousmessagesthatweresentout.Amessagereplybackfroma
participantstating“Iconsent’informedmethattheywantedtobeincludedinthe
study.Onceconsentwasreceived,Idocumentedtheparticipant’semailaddressin
myresearchrecordsandthenscheduledaninterviewwiththemwithin24hours.
Datasaturationwasinitiallyestimatedtobereachedat15participants,butit
wasactuallyreachedaftertheninthparticipant.Iacceptedatotalof15women
seniorleaderparticipantsinordertofollowtheprojectedestimateofparticipants
forthestudy.Afterthe15thparticipanthadbeenrecruitedandinterviewed,I
informedallwomenwhoexpressedinterestinthestudythattherecruitment
processhadconcluded.
Instrumentation
Phenomenologyresearchstudiesusethepersonalinterviewtocollectdata
fromparticipants.Thistypeofinterviewgivestheresearchertheabilitytocollect
datausingaduplicative,open-endedapproachthatencouragestheparticipantto
describetheirexperiencesinasemistructuredmanner(Moustakas,1994).
Comparedtoasurveyquestionnaireinterviewthatallowsforconsistentreplies
throughouttheresponses,theinterviewprotocolforatranscendental
phenomenologicalinterviewisthesetupofaconversationbetweenresearcherand
researchparticipantwiththeoverarchingquestionaskedandiftheanswersarenot
59
addressedfromtheopen-endedquestionsspontaneousprobingquestionsbythe
interviewer.
Theresearchersoughttoobtainadetaileddescriptionoftheexperienceand
understandthesignificanceofthephenomenonthroughtheeyesoftheparticipant
(Leedy&Ormrod,2005).Bydoingso,theresearcheravoidedaskingquestionsthat
wouldautomaticallyclassifythephenomenonintopre-definedcategoriesorthemes
whileremainingexposedtofirsthandandunforeseeninfluencesthatcameup
duringtheinterview(Polkinghorne,1989).
Fortranscendentalphenomenologicalstudies,conductingaface-to-face
interview,whichhasahighresponserateofupto80%,isanacceptablewayto
gatherdatatoansweropen-endedquestionstoexplorethephenomenonbeing
studiedandobtainothernewinformation(Singleton&Straits,2005).Duetothe
lackoffundingtobeabletointervieweachparticipantface-to-facein-personand
timeconstraints,IsignedupforafreevideoconferencingaccountwithSkypewith
thesolepurposeofinterviewingparticipantswhochooseavideointerviewovera
phoneinterview.Conductinginterviewsoverthetelephoneisalowcostoption
comparedin-personface-to-faceinterviews,whichcouldincludetravel,
administrativeexpenses,andparticipantcompensationexpenses.Adisadvantageof
theuseofatelephoneinterviewisthatparticipantsmaybehesitanttodiscuss
personalinformationiftheyarenotinanenvironmentwheretheycanseeandbuild
arapportwiththeresearcher(Singleton&Straits,2005).
60
Interview Protocol
Inordertoguidetheinterviewconversation,afewpromptswerecreatedin
accordancewiththeproceduredefinedbyMoustakas(1994)andPolkinghorne
(1989).Aninterviewprotocolwascreatedandusedbytheresearcher(see
AppendixB)fortheinterviewprocess.Theinterviewprotocolconsistedofan
introductiontothestudy,sixdemographicquestions,researchquestion,and
conclusion.Theresearchquestionproducedadetaileddescriptionofthe
participant’sexperienceofthephenomenon.Theprotocolwasusedinthesame
sequenceandmannerforeachparticipant.Thepurposeoftheinterviewprotocol
wastoensureasystematicapproachtoeachinterviewconductedbetweenthe
researcherandtheparticipant.Byusinganinterviewprotocol,Iensuredthe
organizationofthedatacollectionandthateachparticipantwasreceivingthesame
informationeachtimeaninterviewwasconducted.
Procedures for Recruitment, Participation, and Data Collection
ThepopulationforthisstudyincludedwomenleadersworkingintheITfield.
Fifteenwomenparticipantswereinterviewedforthisstudy.Therewasalistof
requirementsthatparticipantsmusthavemetinordertoqualifytoparticipatein
thestudy.Thefirstrequirementwasthattheparticipanthadtobeafemalesenior
leadercurrentlyworkingintheITfieldwithajobtitleofpresident,vicepresident,
C-levelpositionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chiefoperationsofficer
(COO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),directorandmanageriallevelpositions.The
secondrequirementwasthattheparticipantmusthaveworkedinhercurrentrole
61
fortwoyearsormore.Lastly,theparticipantmusthavelivedandworkedinthe
continentalUnitedStates.
UponIRBapprovalfromWaldenUniversity,IsentoutLinkedInemailinvites
toprospectiveparticipantstothestudy(seeAppendixA).Prospectiveparticipants
wereidentifiedandsolicitedwithinmyprofessionalnetworkonLinkedIn.Thegoal
forthisstudywastohaveatleast15womenseniorleaderparticipants.Istartedthe
participantrecruitmentprocessbycontactingatleast30womenwiththerationale
thatsomepeoplewoulddecline,notreplytotheemailinvite,orreplybutdidnot
qualify.
DataAnalysisPlan
Datacollectionforalloftheparticipantinterviewswasconductedviaaone-
hourtelephone.NooneoptedtocompletetheirinterviewviaSkype.Allparticipants
gavetheirconsenttohavetheaudiorecordedwiththeuseofataperecorder.A
secondarytaperecordingdevicewasavailableintheeventthatthefirstrecording
devicemalfunctioned.Datacollectionfortranscendentalphenomenologicalstudies
isderivedfromfirst-personaccountsduringinformalone-to-oneinterviews,which
aretranscribedandanalyzedforthemes,patterns,andcontextualmeanings
(Roberts,2013).Inordertomakesurethatthedatacollectionprocesswas
effectivelyfacilitated,Iensuredthateveryparticipantwasscheduledforaparticular
dateandtimeslottocompletetheirinterview.Eachparticipantwasemailedor
messagedacopyof“ParticipantInvitationandConsentForm”toreview(see
AppendixB).
62
Theresearcheriskeyinanalyzingandattachingmeaningtothelived
experiencesandthisstudywasthroughthetranscendentalviewoftheworld.
Transcendentalphenomenologyreductiontakeseachexperienceandconsidersitin
itssingularity,inandforitself(Moustakas,1994).Moustakas(1994)stated“the
phenomenonisperceivedanddescribedinitstotality,inafreshandopenway”
(p.33).Transcendentalphenomenologyreductionallowstheresearchertoderivea
textualdescriptionofthemeaningsandessencesofthephenomenon,the
participantsthatexperiencethephenomenon,andthevantagepointofanopenself
(Moustakas,1994).
Oncethetelephoneinterviewswerecompleted,Itranscribedtheaudio
recordingswiththeuseofNVivo12Transcriptionsoftware.Icompletedthe
membercheckingprocessbyemailingeachparticipantacopyoftheirwritten
transcriptoftheirtelephoneinterviewforthemtoreviewandverify.Oncethe
interviewtranscriptswereapprovedbyeachparticipant,IuploadedthemtoNivio
12fordatacodingandanalysis.Ireadthrougheachinterviewtranscriptmultiple
timestobecomefamiliarwiththedatathatwascollected(Stuckey,2015).
ThedataanalysiswascompletedusingthemodifiedVanKaammethodas
recommendedbyMoustakas(1994).Thismethodenabledmetolookforpatterns
andthemestodrawconclusionsregardingtheparticipant’sexperiencestoaddress
thestudy’sresearchquestion.Iwasabletoprovidetexturalandstructural
guidelinesbeforeusingtheNVivo12qualitativesoftwareprogram.Thefollowing
stepsweretakeninordertoanalyzethedatausingthemodifiedVanKaammethod:
63
1. Listedandgroupedallcompletedtranscriptsthatwereobtained
duringdatacollection
2. Clusteredthedataintoinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemes
3. Identifiedinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemesinorderto
organizethegroupingstranscribedfromtheinterviews
4. Formedtextural-structuraldescriptionsofthemeaningsandessences
oftheexperiencemergingboththeinvariantconstituentsandthemes
5. Usedthethemestodeterminethemeaningofthelivedexperiences
thatinvolvedthekeyfindingsandrecommendationsforthestudy
(Moustakas,1994,p.121)
Issues of Trustworthiness
Intranscendentalphenomenologicalresearch,validityismeasuredbythe
abilityoftheresearchertoconvincereadersthattheresearchfindingsareaccurate
(Polkinghorne,1989).Theresearcherhastoprovethatthereisasynthesisofraw
datathatwascollectedinthefieldtomeaningfulthemes.Thissynthesisofdata
mustbedisplayedinageneralstructuraldescription.
Validitywasachievedwhentheresearcherconvincesreadersthatcommon
themesandexamplescollectedsupportthestructuraldescription(Polkinghorne,
1989).Interviewerinfluenceonparticipantdescription,transcriptionaccuracy,bias
intranscriptionanalysis,traceabilitybetweengeneralfundamentaldescriptionsan
specificaccountsoftheexperience,andgeneralizabilityofthestructuraldescription
64
toothersituationsareallissuesthatneedtobeaddressedtoensurevalidity
(Polkinghorne,1989).
Iwentthroughaprocessofself-reflectionorbracketingbeforeeach
interviewinordertochannelassumptionsthatcouldinfluencemyabilitytothink
objectivelywhileconductingtheinterviewswiththeparticipants.Thisprocessof
self-reflectionallowedmetoaddressanypreconceivednotionsandbiasImayhave
hadbeforeeachparticipantinterview.Usingthesemistructuredinterviewquestions
duringtheinterviewprocessallowedforanopendiscussionwiththeparticipant,
whichallowedthemtodetailtheirpersonalandcareerexperiencesusingtheirown
voice(Polkinghorne,1989).Whileinterviewingparticipants,Iensuredthatmy
responsesweremanagedsothattheywerenotinterpretedasswayingthe
participanttoprovideresponsesregardingtheirexperiencesthatwerenottrue.
Iensuredtheaccuracyofthetranscriptionoftheaudiocontenttowritten
formbydoingthefollowing:
• IdevelopedaversionofthetranscriptionusingNVivo12
• Ireviewedeverywrittentranscriptforaccuracyandcompleteness
againsttheaudioversionwhenapplicable.Iftherewereanywords
thatwereunclear,theyweremarkedforfollow-upthattookplace
withtheparticipant.
• Acompletedinterviewtranscriptwaspreparedandsharedwiththe
participant.Theparticipantwasabletomakechanges,edits,deletions
ofsections,andoroptoutofthestudyifdesired.
65
• Onlyapproveddatabytheparticipantwasincludedinthestudy
Credibility
Thecredibilityofastudyisoneofthemostimportantaspectsof
trustworthiness.Credibilityensuresthattheresearcherisconnectingtheresearch
findingswiththerealworldinordertoprovetheresearchstudy’sfindings.There
aremanytechniquesthatcanbeappliedtoestablishcredibility.Triangulationand
membercheckingarethetwoimportanttechniquesusedbymeinthisstudy.
Triangulationisatechniquethatallowstheresearcherinaqualitativestudy
tousevarioussourcesinordertoobtainamoredetailedunderstandingofa
phenomenon.Thesesourcescanincludetheories,observation,anddataanalysis.
Theuseoftriangulationcanhelparesearcherunderstandmisleadingaspectsofa
phenomenon.Therearefourtypesoftriangulation,whichincludedata
triangulation,theoreticaltriangulation,researchertriangulation,and
methodologicaltriangulation.Iuseddatatriangulationforthisstudy.
Memberchecking,whichisalsoknownasparticipantorrespondent
verificationistheprocessofinterviewing,reviewing,andverifyingdatacollected
fromaparticipant.Thisprocessensuresthatresearcher’svoiceandbiasarenot
includedinthedatacollection.Membercheckingcantakeplaceatthevery
beginningofaninterviewandendofaninterview.Byusingthistechnique,I
ensuredthattheyweretrulycapturingthephenomenonasexplainedbythe
participant.
66
Transferability
Transferabilityinqualitativeresearchreferstohowtheresultsofaresearch
studycanbetransferredoutsidethestudy.Inotherwords,transferabilitysuggests
thattheresultsofaparticularstudycanbeapplicabletosimilarsituationsand
phenomenon.Qualitativestudiesaretypicallynotgeneralizableasthereisno
statisticaldataavailable.Comparedtoaquantitativestudy,qualitativeresearch
studiestypicallyhavesmallersamplesizepopulationsthatmakeitdifficulttoimply
generalizationsabouttheresearchresults.
Dependability
Thedependabilityofastudyreferstotheconsistencyofastudy.The
researcherdocumentedanddetailedeachstepoftheresearchprocessofthestudy
sothatanotherresearchercouldduplicatethestudyandproducethesameresults.
Properdocumentationoftheresearchprocessanddatacollectionensured
dependability.
Confirmability
Itwasimportantduringtheresearchprocessandespeciallyduringthedata
collectionanddataanalysisphasesthattheresearcherkeptherownpersonalbias
outofthestudy.Theconfirmabilityofthestudyverifiedthattheresultsofthestudy
wereinfluencedsolelybytheparticipant’svoiceandnotbytheresearcher’sown
personalbias.Inordertoproduceconfirmability,theresearcherprovedand
successfullylinkedthedatacollection,dataanalysisandresearchconclusions
together.
67
Confidentiality and Ethical Procedures
ThisresearchstudycommenceduponapprovalofWaldenUniversityIRB.
Thecertificationnumberis(05-06-19-0485770).Prospectiveparticipantswhomet
theresearchrequirementswereemailedacopyofthe“ParticipantInvitationand
ConsentForm”.Oncetheyrepliedback“Iconsent”tobeingincludedinthestudy,I
repliedbacktothemwithin24hourstoscheduletheirtelephoneorvideo
conferencinginterview.Beforetheinterviewstarted,eachparticipantwasaskedif
theyconsentedtobeingaudiorecordedforresearchpurposes.Participantswere
informedatthebeginningoftheinterviewthattheywereabletowithdrawfromthe
studyverballyorinwritingatanytimewithoutpenalty.Allparticipants’personal
informationandidentitieswerekeptconfidentialandnotsharedwithanyoneelse.
Alldatacollectionitemssuchaswritteninterviewnotesbytheresearcherand
audiorecordingswerekeptinalockedbox.After5years,theseitemswillbe
destroyedandshredded.Last,theparticipant’sidentitieswerereplacedwith
genericidentifierssuchasParticipant01,Participant02,etc.whenreportingthe
resultsofthestudy.
Summary
Chapter3includedadescriptionoftheresearchdesignandmethodforthe
study.Thetranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasselectedasthebest
optionfortheresearchdesignbasedonthenatureofthestudyandresearch
questions.Participantsforthestudywereselectedusingapurposefulsampling
strategy,whichreliedonthepersonaljudgmentoftheresearcher.Participantswere
68
recruitedusingLinkedIn.ThedatawasanalyzedusingthemodifiedVanKaam
method.Chapter4presentsthefindingsofthestudyfollowedbyChapter5that
includestheconclusionsandrecommendationsforfuturestudy.
69
Chapter 4: Results
Mypurposeinthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.This
studysolelyfocusedonwomenwhoworkintheITfieldandareinseniorleadership
positions.Thephenomenonthatallwomenparticipantshadincommonwascareer
advancementinthefieldofIT.Transcendentalphenomenologicalresearchfocuses
ontheessenceofthelivedexperiencesofpeoplewithparticipantsdescribingtheir
ownreality(Moustakas,1994).Duetotheprimaryfocusofthelivedexperiencesof
theindividualintranscendentalphenomenologicalresearch,theresearchquestion
forthisstudywas:
RQ1–Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiences
ofwomenintheircareeradvancement,whichledthemtoachievetheirseniorlevel
positionsintheITfield?
Theremainderofthischapterdetailstheresearchsetting,participant
demographics,datacollection,dataanalysis,evidenceoftrustworthiness,study
results,andsummary.
Research Setting
Duetothegeographicallocationoftheresearcherandparticipantsrecruited,
theresearchinterviewstookplaceviatelephone.Participantsweregiventheoption
tocompletetheirinterviewusingSkype,butnoonechosethisasanoption.The
telephoneinterviewsaveragedapproximately28minutesinlength.
70
Demographics
Thecompositionofthe15participantsisdetailedinTable1.Two
participantsheldvicepresidentpositions,threeparticipantsheldC-levelpositions,
fourparticipanthelddirectorlevelpositions,andsixparticipantsheldpositionsin
middlemanagement.Eachparticipantwasassignedaparticipantnumberranging
fromP01toP15.Theparticipantnumberswerecreatedtoprotecttheidentityof
eachparticipant.
71
Table1
ParticipantDemographics
Participant
Manageriallevel Yearsofexperience
State Ethnicity
P01 Middlemanager 4 PA Twoormoreraces
P02 Middlemanager 13 NC Black
P03 Chiefoperatingofficer 20+ GA Caucasian
P04 Middlemanager 12 NC Black
P05 Vicepresident 20+ NC Twoormore
races
P06 Middlemanager 7 CA Caucasian
P07 Vicepresident 18 TN Caucasian
P08 Director 20+ TN Caucasian
P09 Cybersecurityinformationofficer
15 PA Caucasian
P10 Chiefinformationofficer
20+ GA Caucasian
P11 Middlemanager 8 NC Black
P12 Director 20+ NC Black
P13 Middlemanager 20+ PA Black
P14 Director 18 TX Caucasian
P15 Director 13 CA Asian
72
Data Collection
DataCollectionRecruitment
OnceapprovalwasgrantedbyWaldenUniversityInternalReviewBoard
(IRB:05-06-19-0485770),Istartedtheparticipantrecruitmentprocess.LinkedIn
wastheprimarysourceforrecruitingparticipants.Eachparticipantwhowas
deemedtohavemettheresearchrequirementswassentaninvitation(see
AppendixC)viathemessagingfeatureonLinkedIn.Atotalof143recruitment
messagesweresentdirectlyfrommypersonalLinkedInaccounttoprospective
participants.Ofthe15totalparticipantsforthestudy,7womenwererecruitedfrom
LinkedInandtheremaining8participantsstatedthattheyhadheardaboutthe
studythroughword-of-mouth.
Aspreviouslymentionedinchapter3,itwasdeterminedthatatotalof15
participantswouldbeneededinordertoreachdatasaturation.Datasaturationwas
reachedafterthe9thparticipant.Therewereatotalof16participantsthatwere
recruitedandinterviewedforthisstudy,however;thedataanalysisincludeddata
from15participants.Oneparticipantwasdisqualifiedfromthestudyasitwas
revealedduringtheinterviewthattheparticipanthadtransitionedfromamantoa
woman.Theresearcherdeterminedthatthetransgenderedparticipantshouldbe
disqualifiedfromthestudybasedonthecorrespondencewiththeparticipant.The
disqualifiedparticipantascendedintoseniorleadershipprimarilyasaman.His
transitiontoawomanoccurredafterholdingtheleadershipposition.The
73
disqualifiedparticipantcouldhavesharedheruniqueexperiencebothasamanand
asawoman,butthatwouldbeoutsideofthescopeofthisstudy.
DataCollectionTechnique
Datacollectionforthisstudytook42daystocomplete,whichwaslonger
thanthe30daytimeframethatIoriginallyestimated.Beforeeachtelephone
interview,Ipracticedepochebyclearingmyheadofanybiases,prejudices,and
settingasidemyownpersonalexperiencesinordertonotdirectlyaffectthestudy.
Theinterviewprotocol(seeAppendixB)wasusedforeachinterview,which
includedanintroduction,demographicquestionnaire,interviewquestion,and
conclusion.Theinterviewsrangedfrom15minutesto68minuteswithanaverage
of28minutes.
Participantsweregiventheoptiontocompletetheirresearchinterviewsvia
telephoneorSkype.All15participantschosetocompletetheirinterviewsvia
telephone.Eachparticipantgavemetheirverbalpermissiontorecordtheaudiofor
theinterview.Researchnoteswerehandwritteninanotebookduringeach
participantinterviewandlockedawayalongwiththeaudiorecorderaftereach
interview.Thetranscriptionwascompletedoncealldatafromthe15participants
hadbeencompleted.IutilizedtheservicesofNVivo12Transcriptionsoftwareto
transcribeallofthedata.Oncethetranscriptionswerecompleted,Iemailedeach
individualparticipantacopyofthetranscriptfortheirreviewandapprovalaspart
ofthemembercheckingprocess.Onlyoneparticipantcamebackwithchangesto
hertranscript.Participant02requestedtohavethenameofhercompanyremoved
74
fromthetranscripttofurtherprotectheridentityandthecompanythatsheworked
for.
Data Analysis
OncethedatawastranscribedandIwasabletorevieweachparticipant’s
transcript,Istartednotatingcommondatagroupingsthatappearedfromthe
participant’sresponses.Thetexturaldescriptionswerecreatedfromthe
preliminarygroupingsbasedonthemodifiedVanKaammethodofdataanalysisas
recommendedbyMoustakas(1994)inordertoprovideatexturalandstructural
guidelinesbeforeusingtheNVivo12qualitativesoftwareprogram.Thefollowing
stepsweretakeninordertoanalyzethedata:
1. Listedandgroupedallcompletedtranscriptsthatwereobtained
duringdatacollection
2. Clusteredthedataintoinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemes
3. Identifiedinvariantconstituentsandrelevantthemesinorderto
organizethegroupingstranscribedfromtheinterviews
4. Formedtextural-structuraldescriptionsofthemeaningsandessences
oftheexperiencemergingboththeinvariantconstituentsandthemes
5. Usedthethemestodeterminethemeaningofthelivedexperiences
thatinvolvedthekeyfindingsandrecommendationsforthestudy
(Moustakas,1994,p.121)
75
DataCoding
EachtranscribedinterviewwasuploadedintoNVivo12.Thesoftware
programallowedmetohaveorderandstructureofmydata.Thesoftwareaidedme
inmyunderstandingofthedatathroughthedevelopmentofnodes,clustercoding
similarity,andwordfrequency.TheNVivo12softwaremanagedthecodingofthe
databyisolatingitintocomponentsthatwerecountedbasedontheiroccurrenceof
themes.Thesoftwareprogramgroupedthedataintocategories,themes,and
eliminatedredundantcomponentsofdata.
ThecodinginNVivo12wasaccomplishedbyassigningsectionheadingsfor
participantresponsestothequestionsasanormalstandardtext.Criticaltermsthat
stoodoutfromthetranscribedinterviewswereusedtodevelopemergingthemesto
thelivedexperiencesoftheparticipants.TheNVivo12reportrevealedrelevant
themesfromthedataoncethecodingwascompleted.Sixmajorthemeswere
identifiedfromthecompleteddataanalysis.Emergentthemeswithover30%
frequencybyparticipantswerelabeledasmajorthemes.Therewereno
discrepanciesduringthedataanalysisprocess.
Evidence of Trustworthiness
Credibility
Iwasabletoaccomplishcredibilityasaresearcherandforthisstudy
throughreachingdatasaturation,subjectivity,triangulation,andsupervisionofmy
dissertationcommittee.WhenIwasfacedwiththepossibilityofdisqualifyinga
participantforthestudythathadsharedthatshehadascendedintosenior
76
leadershipasaman,IconsultedwithWaldenUniversityIRBandmydissertation
committeeforadviceonhowtoproceedwiththestudy.Iusedbracketingtochannel
andeliminateallpersonalbiases.Datasaturationwasreachedafterthe9th
participant,butatotalof15participantswereinterviewedaspreviouslyproposed.
Triangulationwassuccessfullyachievedthroughtheassortmentoftelephone
interviewsfromvariousparticipantsfromdifferentbackgroundsasstatedinTable
1.Participantsrangedfromdifferentlevelsofmanagement,livedandworkedin
variousstates,andnumerousethnicitieswererepresented.
Themembercheckingprocesswascompletedwithin24-48hoursofeach
participant’scompletedinterviewforaccuracy.Onlyoneparticipant(Participant
P02)camebackwithrevisionsanddeletionsoftheirwritteninterview.
Transferability
Priortoeachinterview,participantsweregivenaParticipantInvitationand
ConsentForm(seeAppendixA),whichdetailedthebackgroundinformationofthe
study,procedures,voluntarynatureofthestudy,risksandbenefits,compensation,
andconfidentiality.Thisdocumentgavetheparticipantsdetailedinformationabout
thestudyandanunderstandingoftheirroleasaparticipant.Theresponsesfrom
theparticipantsprovideddetailedcommonalitiesofthephenomenonbeingstudied.
Dependability
Iensureddependabilityofthestudybykeepingdetailedrecordsofeach
participantwiththeuseofapasswordprotectedExcelspreadsheet.Information
suchastheparticipant’sname,emailaddress,jobtitle,industry,jobtenure,yearsof
77
seniorleadershipexperience,race,age,andinterviewdateandtimewereall
includedinthespreadsheet.Aftereachinterview,allaudiorecordingswere
uploadedtoapasswordprotectedfolderonmypersonalcomputer.Theprocessof
membercheckingalsoconfirmedthedependabilityoftheparticipant’sexperiences
forthisstudy.
Confirmability
Asystematicprocesswasfollowedfordatacollection,dataanalysis,andfinal
conclusionstoallowareadertoconfirmtheacceptabilityoftheresearchfindings.
Alltypesofpersonalbiaswereexcludedbybracketingtoguaranteevalidityofthe
study.Open-endedquestionswereusedtoachieveconfirmability.
StudyResults
Thefollowingsectionswillprovideanin-depthreviewofthetranscribed
participantresponsesinnarrativeform.Sixmajorthemeswereidentifiedas
pertinenttothepurposeofthestudyandthestatedresearchquestion.Table2
displaysthecode,theme,andparticipantpercentages.Eachthemewasdevelopedas
aresultofthecollecteddatafromtheresearchparticipants.Therewereno
discrepanciesornonconformingdatathatoccurredwhilereportingtheresultsfor
thisstudy.Therewasonlyoneresearchquestionforthisstudy,whichwas:RQ1–
Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesofwomenin
theircareeradvancement,whichledtothemtoachievetheirseniorlevelpositions
intheITfield?
78
Table2
Themes(N=15)
Codes Themes Participant%
001 ITisagreatfield 93 002 MidcareerchangetoIT 40 003 Mentors/supportiveprofessional
network 40
004 Researchyourfuture 33 005 Self-efficacy 53 006 Difficultwork-lifebalance 40
Theme1:ITisaGreatField
Table 3 Theme 1: IT Is a Great Field
Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
1 ITisagreatfield
2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
Texturaldescription.ItissodynamicandIlovetheever-existingchallengeand
changeofworkinginIT
Texturaldescription.AsImentioned,Isatdownwithacounselor.Theylookedat
mygradesandtheylookedatmyskillsandeverythinglikethatinmymessagesand
everythingpreviouseffortstoequalinIndia.Letmeputitthatway.Andbasically
saidthatitwouldbebetterifIactuallychoseITandtheyactuallysaidit'sgoingto
bethatthenextbigthing.Thiswasalongtimeback.SoIbelievedwhatthat
79
counselorwassayinganddoingandjusttookthatITovercriticalmedical
electronicsatthetime.IamsohappyIlistenedtothem!
Texturaldescription.Iwaslikehmm;Icanmakealotofmoney!AndIthinkIhad
theaptitudeforit.Itwasnotdifficultforme.AndIknewallalongthatproject
managementwouldbemorewhatIwantedtodoinsteadofjustpureengineering.
SoIwaswillingtodosomethingonabiggerscale.Andthatwastoogeneric.I
wantedtoseethebiggerpictureandthenputtogetherthewholething.Iam
analyticalinadditiontobeingorganized.Itjustkindoffitformypersonality.Icould
seeattheone-hundredfeetlevelwherealotofpeoplecanonlyseewhatweare
tryingtoaccomplishwhereIcanlookforthetopandnotnecessarilyfrombottoms
up.
All,butoneparticipant(93%)directlystatedoracknowledgedthatworking
intheITfieldisgreatwithmanyrewards.Participantsdescribedbeingabletohave
jobstability,makeagreatdealofmoney,andfeltchallengedduetotheever-
changingnatureofthefield.
Theme2:Mid-CareerChangetoIT
Table 4 Theme 2: Mid-Career Change To IT Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
2 Mid-careerchangetoIT
3,7,8,11,13,14
80
Texturaldescription.Iworkedinfinanceforthefirst4yearsafterIgraduated.I
workedasacorporateauditorasmyfirstjoboutofcollege.Iactuallyutilizedmy
degree.In1995,Ienteredthefederalsector.From1995to2000Iwasina
procurementmanagementjob.In2000,ImovedintotheITarena.
Texturaldescription.Iwasanaccountantforsevenyears.Duringthoseseven
years,Irecallmylastprojectthatlasted18monthstotwoyears.Itwasamixof
accountingandITwork.Wewereverysmallcompany.SotheroleIwasininthose
last18monthstotwoyears,IwouldcallitabusinesssystemsanalystslashQAslash
querydeveloper,butitwas.Iwasaprojectmanagerthatwaskindoffillingallthose
rolesinaverysmallenvironment.Indoingthat,Ireallylearnedallaboutthe
productlifecycleofdoingapackagesystemimplementationofalargeenterprise
package.ItwasJDEdwardsatthetimeandduringthatimplementation.Ilearned
howtowriteaquery.Thatisreallywhatitwas-costaccounting.AndonceIlearned
thepowerofwritingaqueryandwhatitcoulddoforyoutodocostallocations
throughactualcomputergeneratedprocessthatwouldthenfolloweverybody's
laborrateandgetacostaccounting.Writingthatquerykindofdiditformeand
seeingthepowerofcode.
Texturaldescription.Well,ithasbeenmyaccidentalcareer.AndyouknowIreally
didjuststumbleintoitbecauseasIsaidIwasworkinginanofficeenvironment.You
knowbasicallysecretarialworkstuffingpapers.Iwasthego-topersonintheoffice
reallybecauseIwastheyoungestpersonintheroomandhadusedcomputersin
college.Theywerelike“Oh,helphelphelp”meoutaprinterorhelpmehelpme
81
checkmye-mail.IcannotfigureoutyouknowwheredidIsavedmyfile.AndsoI
justgraduallymovedintothatroleintheoffice.IrealizedthatIreallyenjoyedthat
work.AndsoIdecidedtopursueitfulltime.OnceIgotoutofmyPh.D.program,I
gotajobassupport.
FortypercentoftheparticipantsstatedthattheyswitchedovertotheITfield
halfwayduringtheirprofessionalworkingcareers.Outofthe40%ofwomenwho
hadmadeamid-careerswitchtotheITfield,67%ofthemwereintroducedtoIT
functionswhileassistingwithnewsoftwareimplementationsattheirprevious
organizations.Thirty-threepercentofthosewomenmadeamid-careerswitchafter
experiencingbeingthego-topersonintheworkplacetohelptroubleshootIT
relatedissuesbecausetheywereoneoftheyoungeremployeesintheorganization.
Beingthego-topersonsparkedaninterestintheITfieldforthesewomen.
StrategiesforSuccess
Themes3through5(Theme3:Mentors/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork,
Theme4:Researchyourfuture,Theme5:Self-efficacy)arestrategiesforsuccess
thatweresuggestedbytheparticipantswhenasked“Whatadvicewouldyougive
womenworkingintheITfieldthatareinterestedinascendingintosenior
leadership?
82
Theme3:Mentors/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork
Table 5 Theme 3: Mentors/Supportive Professional Network
Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
3 Mentors/supportiveprofessionalnetwork
1,5,7,10,11,13
Texturaldescription.Doagoodjobnetworkingfromthebeginning.Knowthat
everytimeyoumeetsomeoneinyourcompany,youarebeinginterviewedwhether
youortheyknowitornot.Soyouknowwhenyouaremeetingwithpeoplewithin
yourcompanythatyoudonotknowunderstandthateveryinteractioniskindofan
interview.AndthereasonIsaythatisbecauseyoushouldalwaysthinkaboutwhat
kindofimpressionyouleave,right.Armyourselfwithyourboardofdirectors.
Thesearethepeoplethatyousurroundyourselfwiththatknowyouandcanvouch
foryou.Youknowthefirstpartofyourcareerisallaboutyourperformance.Butthe
secondpartofyourcareerisallabouttherelationshipsthatyoumadeasaresultof
youhavingdoneagoodjob.
Texturaldescription.Myadvicetothosewomenandeventothemenwouldbeget
asupportgroup.Therearesomanyneatappsoutthereandwaystobeableto
networkeffectively.
83
Texturaldescription.AndthenIreallydobelievementorscanhelp.Itaughtalot
ofpeopleandIstayopentothat.Youknowpeoplewanttocallandneedtothink
throughthesethings.
Texturaldescription.ButthatisonethingthatIencourage.Idoalotofpeer
mentoringandthatisonethingIencouragethemtodoistogetamentorearlyon.It
isgoodtoknowwhothemoversandshakersareintheorganization.
Fortypercentofwomenstatedthattheyfeelthatthekeytosuccessfor
womenascendingintoseniorleadershippositionsintheITfieldistohaveamentor
throughouttheircareerandtohaveasupportivenetworkofpeoplethatcanvouch
foryou.Oneparticipantstatedthatobtainingalifecoachwasnecessarytohelp
womenunderstandthemselvesandhowtheyprocessthingssothattheycanbea
betterleaderandunderstandthepeoplethattheyworkwith.Fifty-threepercentof
theparticipantsstatedthattheydidnothavementorsduringtheirprofessional
careers.
Theme4:Researchyoufuture
Table6Theme4:ResearchYourFuture
Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
4 Researchyourfuture
4,9,10,11,15
Texturaldescription.Youdon'tworkyoureighthoursyougetyouknowaverage
youknowyouareacandidateforyouknowfirstgenfirstoutoryouknowgarbage
84
ingarbageoutbutforpeoplewhoreallyworkandputforthareallystrongeffort.
Theopportunitiesareendless.Thereisjustnodamagetowhatyoucannotdo.You
havetobeself-motivatedandself-inspiredtosucceed.It'snotgoingtohappen.
Becausesomeone'sgottowalkbysayheythere'sahardworkingpersonandyou
shouldpromoteherpromotehim
Texturaldescription.YouknowtheadviceIwasgiventomebysomebodythatI
foundtobeveryhelpfulistofindatopicorasubjectandreallybecomeanexperton
it.Youknowgettoknowyourdomainexpertiseandbuildyourcredibility.Anddo
thework.
Texturaldescription.Alignyourselfaccordinglywiththecompanyyouworkat.
YouknowI'vebeentherefor34years.AgainIsaythatbecausethat'safeatinitself
becausewe'vehadmassivelayoffsovertheyears.ButthethingthatIthinkhasbeen
awilltoallowmetostaythereishopefullyofcoursewhatIcall"readingthetea
leaves".AndmakingsurethatIunderstandwhat'sgoingonintheindustry.
Knowingwhat'sgoingoninthecompanyinaligningmyselfaccordingly.Weget
quarterlynewslettersatmyjob.Ireadtheannouncementsofwhojustgot
promoted.IreadthosebecauseIthinkalsoallowsmetoplanmynextmoveof“How
doIgetinthatarea?”or“HowdoIgetonthosedeals?”Keepyourhandonthepulse
oftheindustrybecauseit'sactuallyeverchangingandit'schangingveryfast.You
don'twanttobecomeadinosaur.Yougottakeepupwiththetrendsandalotofit
maybedoinghomeworkonyourown.Butyougottatokeepupwiththetrendsand
85
yougottamakesurethatwhenyouwalkinaroomthatyouknowwhatyouare
talkingaboutespeciallyasafemale.
Thirty-threepercentoftheparticipantsstatedthatresearchingyourfuture
willprovidearoadmaptoaspiringwomenseniorleaderstoreachtheirsuccess.
Someoftheparticipantsstatedthattheystaycurrentonwhoisbeingpromoted
withintheirorganizationbyreadingcompanynewslettersandresearchingthe
professionalbiographiesofotherwomenleaders.
Theme5:Self-Efficacy
Table 7 Theme 5: Self-Efficacy
Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
5 Self-efficacy
3,4,6,8,10,13,14,15
Texturaldescription.Isaystaydedicatedandsometimesyouhavetobealittle
tough.Soyouhavetostandupforyourself
Texturaldescription.Persevere!Stickwithitnomatterwhat!Donotgiveupand
therewillbealotofreasonstogiveup.Therearereasonseverysingledaynottodo
this.ButIwouldsaythattherewardsaregreat.Youhaveanabilitytoinfluence
others.Sotherearealotofreasonswhynottoleadortocomeintosteppast
emergingtechnologiescomingalongastheyare.Thereissomuchbiasand
86
discriminationintechnologythatweneedpeopleofcolorinSTEMspecifically
womenofcolorinSTEM.
Texturaldescription.Ittakesinitiative.Imean,IfoundthatIgotpluckedout
becauseIwasalwaystheonethatsaid“Yes,howcanIhelp”.Imademyselfthego-to
fortheseniorlevelmanagementabovemesoitgotmerecognitionIneededtobe
likethecurrentleadership.Soitisjustbeingthatperson.Youcannotbeshyand
introverted.Youhavetosay“yes,Iwanttohelpyou”goaboveandbeyondwhat
yourroleis.Thatwillgetnoticedrightaway.ThatishowIchoosemyteam
members,thepeoplethatwillsucceedme.
Texturaldescription.Donotbeafraidtochallengestuffatwork.Donotbeshyor
donotrefrainfromtalkingbecauseyouaretheonlywomanatthetable.Itisokayto
bedifferentanditisokaytohaveyourownopinionandamindofyourown.
Thelaststrategyforsuccessstatedbytheparticipantswasself-efficacy.
Whenofferingstrategiesforsuccess,53%oftheparticipantsstatedthathavinga
highsenseofself-efficacyisveryimportantasawomanseniorleaderinamale-
dominatedindustry.Womenstatedphrasessuchas“betough”,“persevere”,“take
initiative”,“donotbeafraid”.Havingahighsenseofself-efficacyandmindsetis
equatedwithhavingahighsenseofconfidenceinyourselfthatyouarejustasgood
andqualifiedasyourmalecounterparts.
87
Theme6:DifficultWork-LifeBalance
Table 8 Theme 6: Difficult Work-Life Balance
Themenumber
Theme/texturaldescription Participants
6 Difficultwork-lifebalance
2,3,7,10,11,15
Texturaldescription.Wellnoteasyright.That'skindofbeenthehardestthing.I
madeadecisionveryearlyIdidn'tgothroughallthiseducationandallthisdriveto
stayhome.Soyeahitishard.It'sreallyyouknowaboutprioritiesandsometimes
worktakespriorityandsometimesfamilydoes.Youhavetokindofhaveto
constantlybalanceandchooseandmanage.
Texturaldescription.IthinkIdon'tknowthatitwouldmakeadifference.What
industryyouareinoneareaisfromanITperspectivethatprobablyaddalittlebit
morechallengeinitself.IntheITworld,youknowsomuchofwhatwedoisoff
hours.Sothatwearenotimpactingourcustomersandourusers.Sowhen
somethinggoesdownorpayrollgoesdowninthemiddleofthenight.Youknowitis
notasthesameasanaccountantoranursewhoworksacertainshiftrightandthen
hascoveragewhentheyarenotthere.Thathasbeenabitofachallenge.Alsoyoudo
notschedulethoseoutages.Whensomethingbreaksorwhenyougetacyber
securityattack,thatmayimpactyourlifeandyourchildrenwhenitdoescomeinto
play.IknowforafamilysituationIhavebeenfortunateenoughtohaveaspouseto
helpwithsituationslikethese.Butwe'rebothintechnology.Sotherearetimes
88
thingsaregoingonorthingslikethat.Anditdoesbecomeayesithasbecomea
challenge.Sohavingasupportnetworkhasbeenhelpfulwiththewaytechnologyis
going.Beingabletoworkremotely,beingabletobeeffectiveremotely,having
thingsinplaceaheadoftime,havingbackupsforpeopletocoveryourareatoshare
thatkindofresponsibilitywhenyoudoneedtobeoutofpocketforkidsIthinkhas
beenthekeytosuccess.IthinkIamactuallybeingmoredisciplinedonattending
eventsandnotfeelingguiltyaboutbeingawayfromwork.
Texturaldescription.ItsbeeninterestingbecausebeinginITprettymuchtomeis
blackandwhiteandithastobelogical.SoraisingherandItraveledquiteabitso
raisingherwasdifficultbecauseIwasgonealot.Imissedalotlikeherfirststeps
becauseshewasatdaycare.
Fortypercentofwomenagreedthatraisingyoungchildrenwhileworkingin
theITfieldisverytough.Oneparticipantstatedthatsheputhersuccessfulcareer
overherfamilyandshemissedagreatdealofherchildren’supbringingandisnow
divorced.Sheexpressedagreatdealofregretandsadnessduringherinterview.
Twoparticipantsstatedthattheirplaceofemploymentwasverysupportiveof
havingawork-lifebalanceandthattheywereverypresentandinvolvedintheir
children’slives.Oneparticipantwasveryaggressiveinherresponseof“Itismy
prerogativehowIraisemychildrenandsowhatifIhavebeenlatetomeetingsor
havebeenlatepickingmychildrenupfromschoolduetoameetingrunninglate”to
thequestionof“HowwasitraisingchildrenwhileworkingintheITfield?”Three
89
womenstatedthattheyhadverysupportivehusbandsthathelpedtakecareofthe
childrenandhouseholdwhenthewifehadtobeawayfromhomeduetowork.
Summary
Thischapterprovidedadetailedreviewofthedatacollectionanddata
analysisthatwascompletedforthe15participantinterviewsthatwerecompleted
forthisresearchstudy.Withpriorapprovalfromtheparticipant,telephone
interviewswererecordedandcompletedforeachparticipant.Theparticipants
wererecruitedusingapurposivesamplingwiththeuseofLinkedIn.NVivo12
qualitativeresearchsoftwarewasusedtocompletethetranscriptionanddata
analysisforthedatacollected.
ThemodifiedVanKaammethodwasusedtoanalyzethedatacollectedfrom
theparticipants.Atotalofsixmajorthemesemergedasresultofthedatacoding,
whichincludedITisagreatfield,mid-careerchange,mentors/supportive
professionalnetwork,researchyourfuture,self-efficacy,anddifficultwork-life
balance.Thethemesofmentors/supportiveprofessionalnetwork,researchyour
future,andself-efficacyweregroupedtogetheras“strategiesforsuccess”,which
wasadvicesharedbytheparticipant’sforwomenwhomaybeinterestedin
enteringtheITfieldandforwomenwhoalreadyworkinITandaspiretoascend
intoseniorleadership.Eachofthesesixmajorthemessupportstheresearch
question-Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesof
womenintheircareeradvancement,whichledthemtoachievetheirseniorlevel
positionsintheITfield?Texturaldescriptionswereprovidedtosupporteachtheme
90
andtheresearchfindings.Chapter5includesthestudyresults,limitations,
recommendations,implicationsforpositivesocialchange,conclusionsand
recommendationsfromtheresultsofthestudy.
91
Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Recommendations
ThecareeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldhasnotbeen
addressedintheexistingliterature;therefore;ithasbeendifficultfororganizations
tofullyunderstandandsupportwomentryingtoascendthroughtheranksofsenior
leadershipintheITfield.Futureresearchonthecareeradvancementofwomen
seniorleadersintheITfieldcouldinspireotherwomentopursueseniorleadership
rolesintheirorganizations(Dubowetal.,2013).Byprovidinginformationonthe
careeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield,thefindingsmayassist
organizationswithcreatingtoolsthattheyneedtomentorandsupportwomenwho
maybeinterestedinascendingintoseniorleadershippositions.
Thepurposeofthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.
Selectingatranscendentalphenomenologicalapproachwasthebestoptionforthis
studybecauseitenabledtheexplorationofthelivedexperiencesofthestated
phenomenon,whichinthiscasewasthecareeradvancementofwomensenior
leadersintheITfield.Phenomenologyseekstounderstandthelifeofhuman
experiencesasitislived(Moerer-Urdhal&Creswell,2014).
Dataforthisstudywascollectedwiththeuseofasemistructuredinterview
from15womenseniorleadersintheITfieldlocatedinthecontinentalUnited
States.NiVivo12qualitativesoftwarewasusedtoorganizeandprocessthedatafor
92
thisstudy.Thefollowingsixmajorthemesemergedasaresultofthedatacoding
andanalysis:
1. ITisagreatfield
2. Mid-careerchangetoIT
3. Mentors/supportiveprofessionalnetwork
4. Researchyourfuture
5. Self-efficacy
6. Difficultwork-lifebalance
Thischapterprovidesadetailedanalysisoftheinterpretationoftheresearch
findings,limitationsofthestudy,recommendations,implicationsforthestudy,as
wellasfinalconclusions.
Interpretation of Findings
Theresearchquestionprovidedtheboundariesforthisstudyaswellasthe
explorationofthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Six
majorthemesgeneratedfromthefindingsofthestudywererelatedtotheresearch
question.Theresearchquestionforthisstudywas:
Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesofwomenin
theircareeradvancement,whichledthemtoachievetheirseniorlevelpositionsin
theITfield?
Thesixthemesthatemergedfromthedatawereasfollows:
1. ITisagreatfield
2. Mid-careerchangetoITformorecomplexwork
93
3. Mentors/supportiveprofessionalnetwork
4. Researchyourfuture
5. Self-efficacy
6. Difficultwork-lifebalance
Eachofthesixthemessupportsthemajorityoftheliteraturereviewthatwas
conductedforthisstudy.
Theme1:ITisaGoodField
ThefirstthemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasITisagood
field.Basedonthefindingsofthisstudy,IfoundthatwomenseniorleadersinIT
agreedthattheITfieldisagreatfieldtoworkin.Thefirstthemepartiallysupports
Pretoriusetal.(2015)thatwomenaroundtheglobeotherthantheUnitedStates
specificallypursuecareersinITbecauseoftheperceivedhighstatusassociated
withworkinginthefieldandforjobstability.Fiftypercentofwomenfromresearch
byPretoriusetal.(2015)wereseniorleadersandtheremaining50%werewomen
seniorleadersinlowerlevelITpositions.Allparticipantsforthisstudylivedand
workedinthecontinentalUnitedStates.ParticipantsstatedthatworkingintheIT
fieldwasinteresting,challenging,providedjobstability,andgreatpay.Noneofthe
participantsmentionedstatusintheirdescriptionsofworkingintheITfield.
ThisthemeisalsosupportedbyareportfromtheUnitedStatesDepartment
ofLabor(2017)indicatinganincreaseofwomenintheITfield.Thisincreaseof1%
provesthatthereareinfactwomenseniorleadersinthefieldwhoareascending
intoseniorleadershippositionswithintheITfield.
94
Eachparticipantstatedthattheywereluckyandhappytoworkinsucha
greatfield.Mostparticipantsstatedthattheywerealreadyworkingintheirdream
jobsandcouldnotimaginedoingotherwork.Thesestatementsprovidedbythe
participantsdemonstratethattheyhaveahighsenseofself-efficacyintheirabilities
andbeliefsthattheycanandaresucceedingaswomenseniorleadersinthe
information.
Theme2:Mid-CareerChangetoIT
Thesecondthemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasthat
womenseniorleaderscurrentlyworkingintheITfieldmadeamid-careerchange
fromadifferentfieldtoITbecausetheyfoundittobeexcitingworkandagreatfield
toworkin.Thisemergingthemewasrefreshingtohearfromaresearcher’spoint-
of-viewbecauseitprovesthatwomenareinfactinterestedinIT.Sixoutofthe15
participantsinterviewedforthisstudystatedthattheyswitchedtoacareerintheIT
fieldafterbeingintroducedtoITfunctionsafterworkingonsmallITrelated
projectsintheirpreviousfields.Phrasessuchas“challenging”,“everchanging”,“fast
paced”,“makemoremoney”,“complex”,and“ITmakesworkeasier”wereusedby
participantswhodidamidcareerchangeintotheITfield.Participantsreported
leavingtheirfirstcareerstoworkintheITfieldafterworkingfiveto10years.
Americanwomenmakingmid-careerchangesintotheITfieldformore
complexworkalignwithVarmaandKapur(2015)whohaveextensivelyresearched
IndianwomenworkinginIT.WomeninIndiawithcomputersciencebackgrounds
areviewedasintelligentbeingthattheyareabletohandlethetechnicalaspectsof
95
thejob,workoncomplexprojects,anduseadvancedproblemsolvingskills(Varma
&Kapur,2015).WomenworkinginITpositionsarewellpaidandhavevast
employmentopportunitiescomparedtootherfieldsinthecountry.InIndia,
workinginITisnotafieldformalegeeks,whichissometimestheperceptioninthe
UnitedStates,butisviewedbybothgendersasaprestigioushigh-payingjob
(Varma&Kapur,2015).InIndia,womenwhoworkinITbenefitfromhavinghigh
socialstatusandindependenceofhavingahighsalaryposition,whichovershadows
anypreconceptionsofteachersandgenderdiscrimination(Varma&Kapur,
2015).ThefindingsofthisstudyprovethatAmericanwomensharethesameviews
ofworkingintheITfieldasdoIndianITworkers.
ThisthemealsosupportstheresearchbyOjokohetal.(2014)focusingon
NigerianwomenintheITfield.InNigeria,workinginITisaverypopularfieldto
workindespitehavingissueswithrecruitingmorewomentothefield.Nigerian
womenareveryautonomousanddonothavetodealwithsocietalpressuresof
workinginstereotypicalcareerssuchashomemakers,teachers,oradministrative
rolessuchassecretarialpositions(Ojokohetal.,2014).Nigeriansplacehigh
importanceonbecomingcollegeeducatedandobtainingprofessionaljobs(Ojokoh
etal.,2014).WomenareattractedtothefieldofITinNigeriabecauseitinvolves
interestingworkthatallowsforthemtolearnnewthings,solvecomplexproblems,
andallowsforcontinuouseducation,whichmakesthemappearknowledgeableand
up-to-dateonnewtechnologies(Ojokohetal.,2014).
96
ThisstudydoesnotsupporttheresearchfindingsbyWay(2015)ofwomen
leavingtheITfieldmidcareer.Theparticipantsofthisstudypurposelysoughtoutto
workintheITfieldfromthebeginningoftheircareersorswitchedtotheITfield
halfwaythroughtheirworkingcareers.Eachparticipantstatedthattheywerelucky
andhappytoworkinsuchagreatfield.Mostparticipantsstatedthattheywere
alreadyworkingintheirdreamjobsandcouldnotimaginedoingotherwork.
Thethemeofwomenmakingamid-careerchangetoITprovesthat
Bandura’s(1986)socialcognitivetheoryshapedthemindsetsofthewomenwho
wereaffectedbythistheme.BeingintroducedtoITfunctionsintheirprevious
careerscreatedasenseofexcitementandfulfillment.Realizingthattheyweregood
atwhattheyweredoingintheirnewfoundinterest,thesewomenhadahighsense
ofself-efficacytofollowtheirdreamsandbecomesuccessfulleadersinthefieldof
IT.
Theme3:Mentors/SupportiveProfessionalNetwork
Thethirdthemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasforwomen
tohaveamentorandfurtherestablishasupportiveprofessionalnetwork.The
participantsofthisstudysuggestedobtainingamentoratthebeginningofa
women’scareerinIT.Therearemanydifferentjobpathwaysthatcanbepursuedin
ITsuchasnetworking,hardware,software,coding,andprojectmanagementjustto
nameafew.Withsomanypathwaystopursue,itwasstatedbytheresearch
participantstoobtainamentorthatcanguideandintroducewomenthroughthe
diversefieldofITwouldbehelpfultotheirsuccess.
97
Thefewinthisstudywhostatedthattheydidhaveamentorthroughout
theircareersallhadmalementors.Theparticipantsstatedthattheywishtheyhad
womenmentorsintheirfield.Instead,theyhadtoworkharderthantheirmale
counterpartstoberecognizedfortheirhardworkanddedication.Thistheme
supportsBlockandTietjen-Smith(2016)whoarguedthatthereisashortageof
womenseniorleadersandinparticular,inthehighereducationadministrationfield
becausethereisalackofsame-genderrolemodelmentors.
ThisthemealsoalignswithHowe-Walsh&Turnball(2016)whostated“the
lackofwomeninseniorpositionsmakesitevenmoredifficultforotherwomento
enterintoseniorlevelpositions”.Insimplerterms,onecandeducethatwomenare
notgoingtobeattractedtoaparticularjoborfieldiftherearenototherwomen
doingthistypeofwork.Thesocialcognitivetheoryconcludesthatpeoplewillmimic
andfollowbehaviorsthattheyhavelearnedintheirsocialenvironment.Itis
difficultforwomentogravitatetothefieldofITiftherearenototherwomenin
highernumbersdoingthistypeofwork.HavingotherfemalementorsintheITfield
mayinterestotherwomenaspiringtoascendintoseniorleadershipiftheyhave
someonetheycanemulatethathasalready“madeit”.
Thethemeofhavingamentorandsupportiveprofessionalnetworkaligns
withBandura’s(1986)socialcognitivetheory,whichistheconceptualframework
forthisstudy.Thesocialcognitivetheoryispoweredbyinfluences,behaviors,anda
person’senvironment.Bandurabelievedthataperson’ssocialenvironment
influencestheirbehaviorandactionsonhowtheyrespondtogivensituations
98
(1986).Thewomenparticipantsofthisstudysuggestedthatotherwomenstarting
outinITsurroundthemselveswithotherwomenmentorsandhaveasupportive
professionalnetworksothattheycanbeinfluencedandlearnfromothersuccessful
women.Bydoingthis,womenseniorleadersarenurturing,teaching,andinspiring
otherwomen,whichmayhelptoincreasetheirself-efficacy,whichwillthenhelp
projectthemintoseniorleadershiproles.
Theme4:ResearchYourFuture
Thefourththemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasresearch
yourfuture.DuetothefactthattheITencompassessomanysegments,itis
imperativethatwomenresearchdifferentITsegmentssuchasnetworking,
hardware,software,coding,orprojectmanagementforexampletoseewhatarea
theymaybeinterestedinworkingin.Itwassuggestedbythewomenseniorleader
participantsforthisstudythatwomenjuststartingoutinITtoresearchthe
educationalbackgrounds,certifications,andbiographiesifavailableofothersenior
leaderswhetheritbemenorwomentoseewhatstepstheytooktogettowhere
theyarenowasaseniorleaderintheITfield.
Inresearchingotherseniorleaderscareerbackgrounds,womenwillbeable
tocreateapossibleroadmapthatwillleadthemtoseniorleadershipintheITfield.
Thismaybetheopportunityforwomentogainamentorastheyresearchother
seniorleadersinthefield.Thethemeofresearchingyourfuturegoeshand-in-hand
withthethemeofmentoringandsupportiveprofessionalnetwork.Researching,
99
uplifting,andsupportingoneanotherishowwomencanadvanceintosenior
leadershipintheITfield.
ThethemeofresearchingyourfuturealignswithBandura’s(1986)social
cognitivetheory.Aspreviouslymentionedwiththethemeofmentors/supportive
professionalnetwork,thesocialcognitivetheoryispoweredbyinfluences,
behaviors,andaperson’senvironment.Oneparticipantstatedthatshelooksather
organization’squarterlynewsletterandpaysspecialattentiontoannouncementsto
otherswhohavebeenpromotedintheorganization.Shestatedthatshemakesita
pointtoreadthatperson’sworkbioifavailableandseewhatcourseofactionthey
tooktogettowheretheyarenow.Thisisaprimeexampleofusingapplyingthe
socialcognitivetheoryinthethemeofresearchingyourfuture.
Theme5:Self-Efficacy
Thefifththemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasself-efficacy.
Overhalfoftheparticipantsforthisstudystatedthatbelievinginyourselfwillbring
successinyourcareerandasaseniorleaderinamaledominatedfieldsuchasIT.
Whentheparticipantswereaskedabouttheirviewsandexperiencesofbeinga
seniorleaderintheITfieldinamaledominatedindustry,Ireceivedrepliessuchas
“sowhatifitisamaledominatedindustry”,“Icometothetableasakeyplayer.Ido
notexpecttobetreateddifferentlybecauseIamafemale”,“Iamsmartandpossess
highlytechnicalskillsthatsetmeapartfromothersinmyfield”.Theresponsesfrom
theseparticipantspromotedhavingahighsenseofself-efficacytoworkand
competeinamaledominatedfieldsuchastheITfield.
100
Additionally,theparticipantswereaskedwhatadvicetheywouldgiveother
womenwhoareinterestedinenteringintotheITfieldandwhatadvicewouldthey
givetowomenwhoarealreadyinthefieldandaspiretoascendintosenior
leadership.Responsesrangedfrom“betoughandstandupforyourself”,“take
initiative”,and“beyourbiggestcheerleader”.Theseresponsesalsodemonstrated
thathavingahighsenseofself-efficacyisthekeytosuccessasawomensenior
leaderintheITfield
Thisthemesupportsanindividual’ssuccessfulperformanceatgetting
somethingcompletedstrengthenshisorherself-beliefsofhisorherown
capabilities(Wood&Bandura,1989).Self-efficacyaffectseveryaspectofhuman
behavior.Byidentifyingandunderstandingthebeliefsapersonholdsregardinghis
orherpowertoaffectsituations,itstronglyinfluencesboththepoweraperson
actuallyhastofacechallengesandmakedecisions.Inaddition,thisthemesupports
Galvezetal.(2018),employeeswithahighsenseofself-efficacyareableto
overcomeobstaclesandsetbackstheyexperienceintheworkplace.Theyareableto
takepartinworkplaceopportunitiesduetothefactthattheyareengaged,mindful,
andhaveastrongbeliefintheirabilities.
IntheITfield,womenaretheminoritycomparedtomen.Womenworkingin
maledominatedfieldshavetocontinuouslyprovethattheyareworthytoworkwith
inthe“goodoleboys”environment.Somewomenmaylackconfidencein
themselvestobesuccessfulintheirjobsorcareersintheITfield.Inaddition,some
womenmaylackmotivationtosucceedintoseniorleadershippositionsbecause
101
theymayfeelthattheydonotfitintothehierarchyofbeinginamaledominated
industry.Overhalfofthewomenparticipantsofthisstudydirectlystatedthatthey
wereconfidentintheirabilitiestoworkinamaledominatedfieldsuchasIT.
Theemergingthemeofself-efficacyalsosupportsGrantandTaylor(2014)of
providingwomenwithessentialcommunicationskillsthatareneededtoproject
confidencewheninterviewingforseniorleadershippositions.These
communicationessentialsincludestartingstrong,stayingsuccinct,dimensionalizing
content,owningvoice,controllingmovement,andprojectingwarmth(Grant&
Taylor,2014).Theseareskillsthateveryleadershouldpossesstoeffectively
communicatewithothers.Havingastrongsenseofself-efficacywhenspeakingwill
exudeconfidencethatpeopleliketoseeintheirleaders.
Theme6:DifficultWork-LifeBalance
Thesixththemethatemergedfromthefindingsofthisstudywasdifficult
work-lifebalance.Thirteenoutofthe15womenseniorleaderparticipants
interviewedforthisstudystatedthattheyhadchildren.Thetwoparticipantsthat
didnothavechildrensharedthattheycouldnotimagineworkingintheITfielddue
tothedemandsandnontraditionalworkhoursofthejob.Halfoftheparticipants
whohavechildrenstatedthattheyhadagreatsupportsystemsuchastheir
husbandsortheirparentsthatwereavailabletotakecareoftheirchildrenwhen
theywerenotavailabletodoso.Theotherhalfoftheparticipantsstatedthatthey
missedagreatdealoftheirchildren’supbringingandexpresseddeepregretand
102
remorse.Oneparticipantcriedduringherinterviewandstatedthatsheputher
successfulcareeroverherfamilyandnowsheisallalone.
ThisthemesupportsBierema(2016)thatwomenareatadisadvantage
beforetheyeveninterviewforasenior-leadershippositionduetothe“idealworker”
image.Itishardforsocietytoviewwomenasanidealworkerduetothefactthat
womenaretraditionallyexpectedtobethecaregiversofthefamily.This
expectationputswomenatadisadvantageofmovingintoaseniorlevelposition
becauseiftheyaretakingcareoftheirfamilies,theycannotpossiblyworklong
hours.
Akeycomponentofthesocialcognitivetheory,whichisself-efficacy,is
demonstratedinthelastthemeofdifficultwork-lifebalance.Themajorityofthe
womenparticipantswhostatedthattheyhadchildrenstatedthatitwasdifficult
pursuingtheircareersinademanding,fast-pacedfieldwithnontraditionalwork
hourswhilealsotryingtoraiseyoungchildren.Whatassistedthesewomenthrough
difficulttimestosucceedintheircareerswhileraisingyoungchildrenwastheirself-
efficacy.Self-efficacyhelpedtheseparentsovercomechallengesandmake
contingencyplansforwhensystemoutagesoccurredinthemiddleofthenightor
whenworkmeetingsranlongerthanexpectedandchildpickupneededtobe
rearranged.
Limitations of the Study
Thesamplesize,researchfindingsandissuesoftrustworthinesscontributed
tothelimitationsofthestudy.Thehonestyoftheparticipantswasthefirst
103
limitationofthestudy.Astheresearcher,Ihadtotrustthattheparticipantswere
beingtruthfulinsharingtheirlivedpersonalexperiencesaswomenseniorleaders
intheITfieldwithme.ToensurethatIaccuratelycapturedthelivedexperiencesin
theirownwords,Icompletedtheprocessofmembercheckingbyhavingeach
participantreviewandverifytheirinterviewtranscriptsforaccuracy.
Thesecondlimitationforthisstudywasthepurposivesamplesizeof15
participantslocatedwithinthecontinentalUnitedStates.Asamplesizeof15was
determinedtobethepointatwhichdatasaturationwouldbeachieved.Data
saturationisthepointtodiscontinuecollectingdata(Saundersetal.,2018).Data
saturationwasachievedafterthe9thparticipant,however;Icontinuedonto15
participantsasoriginallyproposedforthestudy.Thefirstnineparticipantswere
easytosecure,however;thelast6participantsweredifficulttosecure.
Thelastlimitationofthestudywastimeconstraintsoftheparticipants.Data
collectionwascompletedin42days.Coordinatingaroundtheparticipant’s
schedulesandtakingintoconsiderationdifferenttimezonesmadeitchallengingat
timestocompletethedatacollectionprocess.Therewereatotalof5prospective
participantsthatexpressedinterestinthestudy,however;theirworktravelscaused
themnottobeabletocommit.
Recommendations
Thepurposeofthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.The
104
phenomenonthatallparticipantshadincommonwastheircareeradvancement
intoseniorleadershipinfieldofIT.Theresultsofthisstudyrevealedarangeof
factorsforwomentoconsiderbothasanemployeeinamaledominatedfieldandas
aseniorleaderinthefieldofIT.Thetwohighestrankedthemesbytheparticipants
thatemergedfromthedatawasthatITisagreatfieldtoworkinandthatwomen
shouldhaveahighsenseofself-efficacy.Additionalqualitativeresearchisneededto
understandwhywomenseniorleadersfeelthatthefieldofITisagreatfieldto
workin.Thefindingsofthisstudymayhelporganizations,gradeschools,and
universitiesbetterpromotejobsintheITfieldtowomen.Aquantitativestudymay
provideinsightintowhatfactorscontributetowomenseniorleader’sself-efficacyin
theITfield.Thefindingsofthisstudyconfirmedthathavingahighsenseofself-
efficacyisthekeytosuccessforwomen’sascensionintoseniorleadershipintheIT
field.
Irecommendthatresearcherscompleteamoreindepthstudyfocusingon
factorsthatcontributetoself-efficacyofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Other
studiesthatcouldstemfromthissuggestedresearchcouldbetoexploretheself-
efficacyofwomenseniorleadersininvariousITsectorssuchasnetworking,
engineering,hardware,software,andprojectmanagementforexample.This
researchcouldprovideanunderstandingofwhichsegment(s)maycatertoor
attractsmorewomenseniorleaders.Thisstudymayalsobeusefulinpromoting
morewomentothefieldofIT.
105
ThenextrecommendationthatIwouldmakeistostudywomensenior
leaderswhoworkintheITfieldthatalsoidentifyasamemberoftheLGBT
community.Oneparticipantforthisstudysharedthatshewasalesbianandone
participantwhowasrecruitedandlaterdisqualifieduponlearningthather
ascensionintoseniorleadershipwasreachedasamanandnotasawoman.Itwould
beinterestingtohearabouttheiruniqueexperiencesandviewsofhowtheirsexual
orientationmayormaynothaveplayedafactorintotheirprofessionalcareersas
womenseniorleadersintheITfield.
Implications For Positive Social Change
Asaresearcher,Ihavelearnedthattheparticipantsofthisstudyhave
workedveryhardtobecomewomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Thesewomen
seniorleadersintheITfieldsharedanexperienceofadvancingintosenior
leadershipinamaledominatedindustrywhilemostofthemalsostartedtheir
familiesandraisedyoungchildren.Thesewomenattainedtheirpositionsof
leadershipbyworkinghard,believingandstandingupforthemselves,andtaking
initiative.EachparticipantstatedthattheyactivelymentorotherwomeninITand
statedthatitwasimportantthatthattheydidsotoenrichthenextgenerationof
womenleaders.
Thisstudysupportspositivesocialchangebypromotingawarenessofthe
livedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldattheindividual,family,
organizational,andsocietallevels.Attheindividuallevel,womencurrentlyworking
intheITfieldthataspiretoascendintoseniorleadershipmaybenefitfromthis
106
studybyacquiringamentortohelpthemnavigatetheircareerpaths.The
participantsofthisstudyrecommendedthatwomeninITshouldobtainamentorat
thebeginningoftheircareers.Atthefamilylevel,theresultsofthisstudymay
provideanunderstandingforfamilymemberstoimplementcontingencyplansfor
childcareandotherimportantfamilyneedsintheeventtheworkingmotherneeds
toleavehomeforpossiblelatenightwork,longerthanexpectedworkmeetings,etc.
Theworkingmothermayfeelalleviatedandsupportedenoughtoascendintosenior
leadershipiffamilymembersunderstandthedemands,theoftennontraditional
workhoursoftheITfield,andtheneedtoassistwithcontingencyplansforchild
care.
Thisstudyhasnumerousimplicationsforpositivesocialchangeatthe
organizationallevel.Withthisinformation,organizationsmaythinkaboutproviding
aroundtheclockchildcareservicesfortheiremployeeswhomaynothaveaspouse,
familymember,orchildcarereadilyavailablewhenanurgentITmatteroccursin
themiddleofthenight.Bydoingthis,organizationswouldeasetheburdenofthe
difficultwork-lifebalancethatwasexpressedbyparticipantsofthisstudy.There
werethreedifferentthemesofthisstudythatwerelabeledasstrategiesforsuccess
thatwerestatedbythewomenseniorleaderparticipantsintheITfield,which
were:Mentors/supportivenetworksprofessionalnetwork,researchyourfuture,
andself-efficacy.Organizationscanprovidesupporttowomenbyincorporating
thesestrategiesforsuccessintotheirworkplacepractices.Theestablishmentof
formalmentorprogramswithwomenmentoringwomencouldpromotepositivity,
107
inclusion,andasupportivenetworkofwomenintheworkplace.Organizations
couldalsoinvestintheirfemaleemployeesbysendingthemtovarioustradeand
leadershipseminarsandtrainingstogivethemtheskillsthattheyneedtobe
successfulwomenseniorleadersinthefieldofIT.
Atthesocietallevel,theresultsofthisstudypublishedinjournalsand
dissertationabstractsmayincreasethebodyofliteraturebyaddressingthegapon
thelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.Thisresearchmaybe
thefirstofitskindtodiscussandsupportwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.The
findingsofthisstudymayserveasaninspirationandattractmorewomentothe
fieldofIT.
ImplicationsforDifferentMethods
Womenandorganizationsasawholecouldbenefitiftheresultsofthisstudy
wereusedtocreateadditionalresearchstudies.Aquantitativestudycouldbe
createdtosurveywomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtodetermineifself-efficacy
affectscareeradvancement.Myresearchfocusedonphenomenologicalresearch,
however;acasestudycoulddetailthestepstakentoreachseniorleadership.Last,
theDelphimethodcouldbeusedtounderstandwhatwomenneedintheir
workplacementorprograms.Theseproposedstudieswouldhelptoextendthe
literatureregardingwomenseniorleadersintheITfield.
ImplicationsforPractice
Therecommendationsforthepracticeofthistranscendental
phenomenologicalstudycouldprovideinsightandawarenesstopromotingwomen
108
intoseniorleadershippositionsintheITfieldaswellasattractmorewomentothe
field.Thedisseminationoftheresultsofthisstudycouldbepresentedat
conferences,ITrelatedpublications,trainingswithinorganizations,andtohuman
resourcesdepartmentstobringawarenesstowomenandmentoringinthe
workplace.Thisresearchcouldserveasa“wakeupcall”fororganizationsthatdo
nothavewomenseniorleaders.Promotingwomenintoseniorleadershippositions
mayattractmorewomentowanttoworkIT,whichcouldevenouttheplayingfield
ofmenandwomeninthefield.
Conclusions
Thepurposeofthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudywasto
understandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainan
understandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.The
phenomenonforthisstudywasthecareeradvancementofwomenseniorleadersin
theITfield.Theresultsofthisstudyrevealedarangeoffactorsforwomento
considerbothasanemployeeinamaledominatedfieldsuchasITandasasenior
leaderinthefield.Thetwohighestrankedthemesbytheparticipantsthatemerged
fromthedatawasthatITisagreatfieldtoworkinandthatwomenshouldhavea
highsenseofself-efficacy.Thisstudyconfirmedthathavingahighsenseofself-
efficacyisthekeytosuccessforwomen’sascensionintoseniorleadershipintheIT
field.
Thefindingsofthistranscendentalphenomenologicalstudyextendedthe
knowledgeinthedisciplineofmanagementtoenableorganizationsandwomen
109
aspiringtoascendintoseniorleadershipinthefieldbyunderstandingthelived
experiencesofwomenwhoarealreadyseniorleadersinthefield.Sixthemes
emergedfromthedataanalysisforthisstudy,whichwere:ITisagreatfield,
midcareerchangetoIT,mentors/supportiveprofessionalnetwork,researchyour
future,self-efficacy,difficultwork-lifebalance.Myrecommendationsaretofurther
thisresearchbyexpandingthescopetovariousITfunctionssuchasnetworking,
engineering,hardware,software,andprojectmanagementforexamplewitha
differentmethodology.Thisstudymaycontributetopositivesocialchangeby
promotingtheunderstandingoftheexperiencesandperspectivestrategiesfor
increasingthecareeradvancementofaspiringwomenleadersinamaledominated
industrysuchasIT.Anincreasedunderstandingofwomenseniorleaders’
experiencesinITcouldattractmorewomen,levelingtheplayingfieldofmenand
women.
110
References
Alonso-Almedia,M.(2014).Doesgenderspecificdecisionmakingexist?EuroMed
JournalofBusiness.10(1),47-65.doi:10.1108/embj-02-2014-0008
Ambrosetti,A.(2014).Areyoureadytobeamentor?Preparingteachersfor
mentoringpre-serviceteachers.AustralianJournalofTeacherEducation.
39(6),30-42.doi:10.14221/ajte.2014v39n6.2
Anderson,L.,Edberg,D.,Reed,A.,Simkin,M.G.,&Stiver,D.(2017).Howcan
universitiesbesetencouragewomentomajorininformationsystems?
CommunicationsoftheAssociationforInformationSystems.41(29),734-758.
doi:10.17705/1CAIS.04129
Angel,R.,Killacky,J.,&Johnson,P.(2013).AfricanAmericanwomenaspiringtothe
superintendency:Livedexperiencesandbarriers.JournalofSchool
Leadership,23(4),592-614.Retrievedfrom
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1045462
Anosike,P.,Ehrich,L.C.,&Ahmed,P.(2012).Phenomenologyasamethodfor
exploringmanagementpractice.InternationalJournalofManagement
Practice.5,205-224.doi:10.1504/IJMP.2012.048073
Anyikwa,V.A.,Chiarelli-Helminiak,C.M.,Hodge,D.M.,&Wells-Wilbon,R.(2015).
Womenempoweringwomen.JournalofSocialWorkEducation.51,723-737.
doi:10.1080/10437797.2015.1076283
Araujo-Pinzon,P.,Alvarez-Deardet,C.,Ramon-Jeronimo,J.M.,&Florez-Lopez,R.
(2016).Womenandinter-organizationalboundaryspanning:Awayinto
111
uppermanagement?EuropeanResearchonManagementandBusiness
Economics.23(2),70-81.doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.11.001
Arena,C.,Cirillo,A.,Mussolino,D.,Pulcinelli,I.,Saggese,S.,&Sarto,F.(2015).
Womenonboard:Evidencefromamasculineindustry.Corporate
Governance:TheInternationalJournalofBusinessinSociety.15(3),339-356.
doi:10.1108/CG-02-2014-0015
Ashcraft,C.,Eger,E.,&Friend,M.(2012).GirlsinIT:Thefacts.Retrievedfrom
http:www.ncwit.org/thefactsgirls
Baker,C.(2014).Stereotypingandwomen’srolesinleadershippositions.Industrial
&CommercialTraining.46(6),332-227.doi:10.1108/ICT-04-2014-0020
Ballard,J.,Scales,K.,&Edwards,M.A.(2006).PerceptionsofITcareersamong
womenincareerdevelopmenttransition.IT,Learning,andPerformance
Journal.24(2).Retrievedfrom
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.597.8562&rep=r
ep1&type=pdf
Bandura,A.(1995).Self-efficacyinchangingsocieties.Cambridge,MA.University
Press.
Bandura,A.(1997).Self-efficacy:Theexerciseofcontrol.NewYork,NY:W.H.
FreemanandCompany.
Barry,J.S.(2017).Continuingthemarchtowardamorediverseprofession.CPA
Journal.87(3),5.Retrievedfromhttp://www.cpajournal.com
112
Berdousis,I.,&Kordaki,M.(2014).Genderdifferencesandachievementin
computerscience:ACaseStudy.Procedia–SocialandBehavioralSciences.
191(2015),1161-1166.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.233
Berry,E.(2014).Breakingglassceilings,ignoringdirtyfloors:Thecultureandclass
biasofdiversitymanagement.AmericanBehavioralScientist.58(2),347-370.
doi:10.1177/0002764213503333
Bierema,L.L.(2016).Women’sleadership:Troublingnotionsofthe“idea”(male)
leader.AdvancesinDevelopingHumanResources.18(2),119-136.
doi:10.1177/1523422316641398
BlackChen,M.(2015).Toleadornottolead:Womenachievingleadershipstatusin
highereducation.AdvancingWomeninLeadership.35,153-159.Retrieved
fromhttp://www.advancingwomen.com/awl/
Block,B.A.,&Tietjen-Smith,T.(2016).Thecaseforwomenmentoringwomen.
Quest.68(3),306-315.doi:10.1080/00336297.2016.1190285
Blossser,E.(2017).Gendersegregationacrossengineeringmajors:How
engineeringprofessorsunderstandwomen’sunderrepresentationin
undergraduateengineering.EngineeringStudies.9(1),24-44.
doi:10.1080/19378629.2017.1311902
Bristol,L.,Adams,A.E.,&GuzmanJohannessen,B.G.(2014).Academiclife-support:
Theselfstudyofatransnationalcollaborativementoringgroup.Mentoring&
Tutoring:PartnershipinLearning.22(5),396-414.
doi:10.1080/13611267.2014.983325
113
BureauofLaborStatistics.(2014).STEM101:Intrototomorrow’sjobs.
OccupationalOutlookQuarterly.Retrievedfrom
http://www/bls.gov/careeroutlook/2014/spring/art01.pdf
Bynum,Y.(2015).Thepowerofinformalmentoring.Education.136(1),69-73.
Retrievedfromhttp://www.projectinnovation.biz/education_2006.html
Cadaret,M.C.,Hartung,P.J.,Subich,L.M.,&Weigold,I.K.(2016).Stereotypethreat
asabarriertowomenenteringengineeringcareers.JournalofVocational
Behavior.99,40-51.doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002
Carnes,A.Houghton,J.D.,&Ellison,C.N.(2015).Whatmattersmostinleader
selection?Theroleofpersonalityandimplicitleadershiptheories.Leadership
&OrganizationDevelopmentJournal.36(4),360-379.doi:10.1108/LODJ-06-
2013-0087
Catalyst.(2016).Womeninmale-dominatedindustriesandoccupations.Retrieved
September20th,2017fromhttp://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-
male-dominated-industries-and-occupations
Catalyst.(2017).Statisticaloverviewofwomenntheworkforce.Retrieved
September20th,2017fromhttp://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/statistical-
overview-women-workforce
Cetin,F.,&Askun,D.(2018).Theeffectofoccupationalself-efficacyonwork
performancethroughintrinsicworkmotivation.ManagementResearch
Review.41(2),186-201.doi:10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062
114
Cha,T.(2013).Overworkandthepersistenceofgendersegregationinoccupations.
Gender&Society.27(2),158-84.doi:10.1177/0891243212470510
Chen,X.(2013).STEMAttrition:CollegeStudents’PathsIntoandOutofSTEM
Fields(NCES2014-001).NationalCenterforEducationStatistics,Instituteof
EducationSciences,U.S.DepartmentofEducation.Washington,DC.
Cheryan,S.,Play,V.C.,Handron,C.,&Hudson,L.(2013).Thestereotypicalcomputer
scientist:Genderedmediarepresentationsasabarriertoinclusionfor
women.SexRoles.69,58-71.doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0296-x
Cimirotić,R.,Duller,V.,Feldbauer-Durstmüller,B.,&Gärtner,Hiebl,R.W.(2017).
Enablingfactorsthatcontributetowomenreachingleadershippositionsin
businessorganizations.ManagementResearchReview.40(2),165-194.
Retrievedfrom
http://www.emeraldinsight.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/loi/mrr
Cook,A.&Glass,C.(2013).Abovetheglassceiling:Whenarewomenand
racial/ethnicminoritiespromotedtoCEO?StrategicManagementJournal.35,
1080-1089.doi:10.1002/smj.2161
Cook,A.&Glass,C.(2015).Diversitybegetsdiversity?Theeffectsofboard
compositionontheappointmentandsuccessofwomenCEOs.InSocial
ScienceResearch.53,137-147.doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.05.009
115
Cook,A&Glass,C.(2016).Leadingatthetop:Understandingwomen’schallenges
abovetheglassceiling.LeadershipQuarterly.27(1),51-63.
doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003
Costley,J.,&Lange,C.(2018).Themoderatingeffectsofgroupworkonthe
relationshipbetweenmotivationandcognitiveload.InternationalReviewof
ResearchInOpenandDistributedLearning.19(1),68-90.
doi:10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3325
Craig,A.,&Lang,C.(2010).InternationalcollaborationforwomeninIT:Howto
avoidreinventingthewheel.IssuesinInformingScience&IT,329.Retrieved
fromhttps://www.informingscience.org/Journals/IISIT/Overview
Cunliffe,A.L.(2011).Craftingqualitativeresearch:MorganandSmirsch30yearson.
OrganizationalResearchMethods.14,647-673.doi:10.1037/a0029250
Dagenais-Desmarais,V.,Leclerc,J.,&Londei-Shortall,J.(2018).Therelationship
betweenemployeemotivationandpsychologicalhealthatwork:Achicken-
and-eggsituation?Work&Stress.32(2),147-167l.
doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1317880
Davis,D.R.,&Maldonado,C.(2015).Shatteringtheglassceiling:Theleadership
developmentofAfricanAmericanwomeninhighereducation.Advancing
WomenInLeadership.35,48-64.Retrievedfrom
http://www.awljournal.org/awl_wordpress/
116
Diehl,A.B.(2014).Makingmeaningofbarriersandadversity:Experiencesof
womenleadersinhighereducation.AdvancingWomenInLeadership.34,54-
63.http://www.awljournal.org/awl_wordpress/
Dohn,N.B.,Fago,A.,Overgaard,J.,Madsen,P.T.,&Malte,H.(2016).Student’s
motivationtowardlaboratoryworkinphysiologyteaching.Advancesin
PhysiologyEducation.40(3),313-318.doi:10.1152/advan.00029.2016
Dooley,T.P.&Schreckhise,W.D.(2016).Evaluatingsocialcognitivetheoryin
action.Youth&Society.48(3),383-401.doi:10.1177/0044118X13493445
Drury,M.(2011).Womentechnologyleaders:GenderissuesinhighereducationIT.
NASPAJournalAboutWomeninHigherEducation,4(1),96–123.
doi:10.2202/1940-7890.1054
Dubow,W.(2014).Attractingandretainingwomenincomputing.Computing.
47(10),90-93.doi:10.1109/MC.2014.272
Dubow,W.M.,Farmer,R.,Wu,Z.,&Fredrickson,M.(2013).Bringingyoungwomen
intocomputingthroughtheNCWITaspirationsincomputingprogram.
CommunicationsoftheACM.56(12),34-37.doi:10.1145/2435917
Eagly,A.H.,Gartzia,L.,&Carli,L.L.(2014).Femaleadvantage:Revisted.InS.Kumra,
R.Simpson,&R.Burke(Eds.),TheOxfordhandbookofgenderin
organizations.NewYork,NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
117
Eagly,A.H.,&Heilman,M.E.(2016).Genderandleadership:Introductiontothe
specialissue.TheLeadershipQuarterly.27(3),349-353.
doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.04.002
Eagly,A.H.,&Karau,S.J.(2002).Rolecongruitytheoryofprejudicetowardfemale
leaders.PsychologicalReview.109(3),573-598.doi:10.1037/0033-
295x.109.3.573
Edmunds,L.D.,Ovseiko,P.V.,Shepperd,S.,Greenhalgh,T.,Frith,P.,Roberts,N.W.,
…Buchan,A.M.(2016).Whydowomenchoosetorejectcareersinacademic
medicine?Anarrativereviewofempiricalevidence.TheLancet.388(10062),
2948-2958.doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01091-0
Elnaggar,A.(2008).TowardsgenderequalaccesstoICT.ITforDevelopment,14(4),
280–293.doi:10.1002/itdj.20100
Elprana,G.,Felfe,J.,Stiehl,S.,&Gatzka,M.(2015).Exploringthesexdifferencein
affectivemotivationtoleadfurtheringtheunderstandingofwomens
underrepresentationinleadershippositions.JournalofPersonnelPsychology.
14(3),142-152.doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000137
Ezzedeen,S.R.,Budworth,M.,&Baker,S.D.(2015).Theglassceilingandexecutive
careers:Stillanissueforpre-careerwomen.JournalofCareerDevelopment.
42(5),355-369.doi:10.1177/0894845314566943
Ferguson,J.M.(2017).Discreettoexcreteintheconcretejungle:Womenbike
messengersandtheirinventiveurbanstrategiesinthreeUScities.Gender,
Place&Culture.24(1),85-96.doi:10.1080.0966369X.2016.1263602
118
Fernandez,R.M.&Campero,S.(2017).Gendersortingandtheglassceilinginhigh-
techfirms.ILRReview.70(1),73-104.doi:10.1177/0019793916668875
Foti,R.J.,Hansbrough,T.K.,Epitropaki,O,&Coyle,P.T.(2017).Dynamicviewpoints
onimplicitleadershipandfollowershiptheories:Approaches,findings,and
futuredirections.TheLeadershipQuarterly.28(2),261-267.
doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.02.004
Francis,V.(2017).Whatinfluencesprofessionalwomen’scareerdevelopmentin
construction?ConstructionManagementandEconomics.35(5),254-275.
doi:10.1080/01446193.2016.1277026
Fush,P.I.,&Ness,L.R.(2015).Arewethereyet?Datasaturationinqualitative
research.TheQualitativeReport.20(9),1408-1416.Retrievedfrom
https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss9/3/
Galvez,I.E.,Lopez-Martin,E.,Manso,J.,&Valle,J.M.(2018).Determiningfactorsof
teachers’self-efficacyincountriesoftheEuropeanUnion.ResultsfromTalis
2013.EducacionXX1.21(2),225-248.doi:10.5944/educXX1.15875
Ge,C.,Kankanhalli,A,&Huang,K.(2015).Investigatingthedeterminantsofstarting
salaryofITgraduates.TheDATABaseforAdvancesinInformationSystems.
46(4),9-25.doi:10.1145/2843824.2843826
Gill,M.(2014).Thepossibilitiesofphenomenologyfororganizationalresearch.
OrganizationalResearchMethods,17(2),118-137.doi:10.94428113518348
Giorgi,A.(2010).Phenomenologyandthepracticeofscience.ExistentialAnalysis.
21(1),3-21.Retrievedfromhttp://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-03570-001
119
Grant,A.D.,&Taylor,A.(2014).Communicationessentialforfemaleexecutivesto
developleadershippresence:Gettingbeyondthebarriersofunderstating
accomplishment.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2013.09.003
Gray,R.&Milne,M.J.(2015).It’snotwhatyoudo,it’sthewaythatyoudoit?Of
methodandmadness.CriticalPerspectivesonAccounting.32,51-66.
doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.005
Haggard,D.L.(2012).Mentoringandpsychologicalcontractbreach.Journalof
BusinessandPsychology.27(2),161-175.doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9237-2
Hamilton,E.,Cruz,A.D.,&Jack,S.(2017).Re-framingthestatusofnarrativein
familybusinessresearch:Towardsanunderstandingoffamiliesinbusiness.
JournalofFamilyBusinessStrategy.8(1),3-12.
doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.11.001
Hannum,K.M.,Muhly,S.M.,Shockley-Zalabak,P.S.,White,J.S.(2015).Women
leaderswithinhighereducationintheUnitedStates:Supports,barriers,and
experiencesofbeingaseniorleader.AdvancingWomenInLeadership.35,65-
75.Retrievedfrom
http://awljournal.org/Vol35_2015/Hannum_Women_Leaders_within_Higher
_Education2.pdf
Heilman,M.E.(1983).Sexbiasinworksettings:Thelackoffitmodel.Researchin
OrganizationalBehavior.5,269-298.Retrievedfrom
https://www.journals.elsevier.com/research-in-organizational-behavior
120
Heilman,M.E.(2001).Descriptionandprescription:Howgenderstereotypes
preventwomen’sascentuptheorganizationalladder.JournalofSocialIssues.
57(4),657-674.doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234
Heilman,M.E.&Haynes,M.C.(2005).Nocreditwherecreditisdue:Attributional
rationalizationofwomen’ssuccessinmale-femaleteams.JournalofApplied
Psychology.90,905-916.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905
Hennessey,S.M.,MacDonald,K.,&Carroll,W.(2014).Isthereaglassclifforasolid
ledgeforfemaleappointeestotheboardofdirectors?Journalof
OrganizationalCulture,CommunicationsandConflict.18(2),125-139.
Retrievedfromhttp://www.alliedacademies.org/journal-of-organizational-
culture-communications-and-conflict/
Hoyt,C.L.,&Murphy,S.E.(2016).Managingtocleartheair:Stereotypethreat,
women,andleadership.TheLeadershipQuarterly.27(3),387-399.
doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.002
Howe-Walsh,L.,&Turnball,S.(2016).Barrierstowomenleadersinacademia:Tales
fromscienceandtechnology.StudiesinHigherEducation.41(3),415-428.
doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.929102
Huang,J.,&Aaltio,I.(2014).Guanxiandsocialcapital:Networkingamongwomen
managersinChinaandFinland.InternationalJournalofIntercultural
Relations.39,22–39.doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.002
121
Hurley,D.&Choudhary,A.(2016).FactorsinfluencingattainmentofCEOposition
forwomen.GenderinManagement:AnInternationalJournal.31(4),250-265.
doi:10.1108/GM-0102016-0004
Husserl,E.(2012).Ideas:Generalintroductiontopurephenomenology(W.R.Boyce
Gibson,Trans.).London,UK:Routledge.
Ibáńez,(2017).Womenintheconstructiontrades:Careertypesandassociated
barriers.Women’sStudiesInternationalForum.60,39-48.
doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2016.12.001
Jafarey,S.&Maiti,D.(2015).Glassslippersandglassceilings:Ananalysisofmarital
anticipationandfemaleeducation.JournalofDevelopmentEconomics.115,
45-61.doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.12.005
Javdani,M.(2015).Glassceilingsorglassdoors?Theroleoffirmsinmale-female
wagedisparities.CanadianJournalofEconomics.48(2),529-560.
doi:10.1111/caje.12135
Johnson,H.(2016).Pipelines,pathways,andinstitutionalleadership:Anupdateon
thestatusofwomeninhighereducation.Washington,DC:AmericanCouncil
onEducation.
Jung,L.,Clark,U.,Patterson,L.,&Pence,T.(2017).Closingthegendergapinthe
technologymajor.InformationSystemsEducationJournal,15(1),26–41.
Retrievedfromhttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1135665.pdf
122
Kang,J.,&Cohen,P.N.(2017).Extendedkinandchildren’sbehavioralfunctioning:
Familystructureandparentalimmigrationstatus.SocialScience&Medicine.
186,61-69.doi:10.1016/j.socsimed.2017.04.033
Kerr,A.(2016).Redressingthegendergapinsciencethroughuseofthethinking
scienceprogram.TeachingScience:TheJournalofTheAustralianScience
TeachersAssociation.62(3),39-44.Retrievedfrom
https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=430233750577435;
res=IELHSS
Kier,M.,Blanchard,M.,Osbourne,J.&Albert,J.(2014).Thedevelopmentofthe
STEMcareerinterestsurvey(STEM-CIS).ResearchinScienceEducation.
44(3),461-481.doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3
Kochan,F.K.&Trimble,S.B.(2000).Frommentoringtoco-mentoring:Establishing
collaborativerelationships.TheoryintoPractice.39(1),20-28.
doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3901_4
Kodate,N.,&Kodate,T.(2014).Pavingthewayandpassingthetorch:Mentor’s
motivationandexperienceofsupportingwomeninopticalengineering.
EuropeanJournalofEngineeringEducation.39(6),648-665.
doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.899323
Kossek,E.E,Su,R,&Wu,L.(2017).“Optingout”or“pushedout”?Integrating
perspectivesonwomen’scareerequalityforgenderinclusionand
interventions.JournalofManagement.43(1),228-254.
doi:10.1177/0149206316671582
123
Kovnatska,O.(2014).Sayyestomentoring!Don’tbeafraidtoaskforhelpwhile
climbingyourladderofsuccess.StrategicFinance,96(5),47-51.Retrieved
from
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA370886351&sid=go
ogleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1524833X&p=AONE&sw=w
Kuchynkova,L.(2013).Managerialleadershipstyleintermsofgender.Socialiniai
Tyrimai,2013(4),18-24.Retrievedfrom
http://www.su.lt/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1412&It
emid=17354&lang=lt
Lakshmi,S.V.&Peter,A.J.(2015).Genderdifferenceanditsimplicationsfor
organizationaleffectiveness:Realorconstructed.TheJournalContemporary
ManagementResearch.9(1),52-79.Retrievedfrom
https://search.proquest.com/openview/5366a585f82529b0a74e89c21aad6
2fc/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2039847
Leamy,M.,Bird,V.,Boutillier,C.L.,&Williams,J.(2011).Conceptualframeworkfor
personalrecoveryinmentalhealth:Systematicreviewandnarrative
synthesis.TheBritishJournalofPsychiatry.199(6),445-452.
doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733
Leedy,P.,&Ormrod,J.E.(2005).Practicalresearch:Planninganddesign(8thed.).
UpperSaddleHill,NJ:PearsonMerrillPrenticeHill.
124
Lemons,M.A.,&Parzinger,M.(2007).Genderschemas:Acognitiveexplanationof
discriminationofwomenintechnology.JournalofBusinessandPsychology,
22(1),91–98.doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9050-0
Leslie,L.M.,Manchester,C.F.,&Dahm,P.C.(2017).Whyandwhendoesthegender
gapreverse?Diversitygoalsandthepaypremiumforhighpotentialwomen.
AcademyofManagement.60(2),402-432..doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0195
Lisbona,A.,Palaci,F.,Salanova,M.,&Frese,M.(2018).Theeffectofwork
engagementandself-efficacyonpersonalinitiativeandperformance.
Psicothema.30(1),89-96.doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.245
Liu,S.(2013).Afewgoodwomenatthetop:TheChinacase.BusinessHorizons.
56,483-490.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2013.04.002
Long,E.L.,Segalo,P.J.,&Laidlaw,C.(2016).Windowsof(In)equality:Gender
ReflectionsinIT.Gender&Behaviour,14(2),7345–7353.Retrievedfrom
https://www.ajol.info/index.php/gab/article/view/153134
Lyons,P.R.,&Bandura,R.P.(2018).Self-efficacymeasuremayenhanceyour
recruitmentandplacement.HumanResourceManagementInternational
Digest.26(3),35-37.doi:10.1108/HRMID-03-2018-0043
Machina,K.,&Gokhale,A.(2015).Interventionsforincreasingmaleandfemale
undergraduateinterestinIT.Computers&Education,87,277–284.
doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.06.008
125
Mahmod,M.,&Dahalin,Z.M.(2012).Womeninopensourcesoftwareinnovation
process:Wherearethey?JournalofInformation&Communication
Technology,11,113–129.doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2010.5561496
Major,D.A.,Morganson,V.J.,&Bolen,H.M.(2013).Predictorsofoccupationaland
organizationalcommitmentinIT:Exploringgenderdifferencesand
similarities.JournalofBusinessPsychology.28,301-314.
doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9282-5
Moerer-Urdahl,T.&Creswell,J.(2004)Usingtranscendentalphenomenologyto
explorethe“rippleeffect”inaleadershipmentoringprogram.International
JournalofQualitativeMethods.3(2),1-28.
doi:10.1177/160940690400300202
Moustakas,C.E.(1994).Phenomenologicalresearchmethods.ThousandOaks,CA:
Sage.
NationalCenterforWomen&IT.(2014).NCWITScorecard:AReportontheStatus
ofWomeninIT.Retrievedfromhttps://www.ncwit.org/resources/ncwit-
scorecard-report-status-women-information-technology
NationalCenterforWomen&IT.(2016).WomenandIT:BytheNumbers.Retrieved
fromhttp://www.ncwit.org/bythenumbers
NationalScienceFoundation,NationalCenterforScienceandEngineeringStatistics.
(2013).Women,minorities,andpersonswithdisabilitiesinscienceand
engineering:2013.Retrievedfromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
126
Navarro-Astor,E.,Román-Onsalo,M.,&Infante-Perea,M.(2017).Women’scareer
developmentintheconstructionindustryacross15years:Mainbarriers.
JournalofEngineering,DesignandTechnology.15(2),199-221.
doi:10.1108/JEDT-07-2016-0046
Ng,E.S.&Sears,G.J.(2017).Theglassceilingincontext:TheinfluenceofCEO
gender,recruitmentpracticesandfirminternationalizationofthe
representationofwomeninmanagement.HumanResourcesManagement
Journal.27(1),133-151.doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12135
Olofsdotter,G.,&RasmussonM.(2016).Gender(in)equalitycontested:
Externalisingemploymentintheconstructionindustry.NewTechnology,
Work&Employment.31(1),41-57.doi:10.1111/netwe.12057
Omran,M.S.,Alizadeh,H.,&Esmaeeli,B.(2015).Theanalysisofglassceiling
phenomenoninthepromotionofwomen’sabilitiesinorganizations.
InternationalJournalofOrganizationalLeadership.4(3),315-323.
doi:10.19236/IJOL.2015.03.08
Park,J.&Park,M.(2016).Qualitativeversusquantitativeresearchmethods:
Discoveryorjustification?JournalofMarketing.3(1),1-7.
doi:10.15577/jmt.2016.03.01.1
Polkinghorne,D.E.(1989).Phenomenologicalresearchmethods.InR.S.Valle&S.
Halling(Eds).Existential-phenomenologicalperspectivesinpsychology(pp41-
60).NewYork:PlenumPress.
127
PonsPeregort,O.,CalvetPuig,M.D.,TuraSolvas,M.,&Muñoz,Illescas,C(2013).
Analysisofequalgenderopportunityinscienceandtechnology:The
professionalcareersofwomenscientistandtechnologists.IntangibleCapital.
9(1),doi:10.3926/ic.375
Pretorius,H.W.,Mawela,T.,Strydom,I.,Villiers,C.,&Johnson,R.D.(2015).
ContinuingthediscourseofwomeninIT:ASouthAfricanperspective.
Gender,TechnologyandDevelopment.19(3),346-369.
doi:10.1177/0971852415597100
Priya,B.S.&Mahadevan,U.(2013).WomenexecutiveinIT/ITESsectors:Job
satisfactionandqualityofworklife.RajagiriJournalofSocialDevelopment.
5(2),105-114.Retrievedfrom
http://journals.rajagiri.edu/index.php/rssJ/article/view/150
Reid,E.(2015).Embracing,passing,revealingandtheidealworkerimage:How
peoplenavigateexpectedandexperiencedprofessionalidentities.
OrganizationScience.26,997-1017.doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.0975
Rincon,V.,Gonzalez,M.,&Barrero,K.(2017).Womenandleadership:Gender
barrierstoseniormanagementpositions.IntangibleCapital.13(2),319-386.
doi:10.3926/ic.889
Roberts,T.(2013).Understandingtheresearchmethodologyofinterpretative
phenomenologicalanalysis.BritishJournalofMidwifery.21(3),215-218.
doi:10.12968/bjom.2013.21.3.215
128
Russo,A.R.,Solis,A.C.,Villanti,A.C.,Wipfli,H.L.,Kern,T.T.,Lawley,R.K.,
…Benjamin,E.J.(2017).Mentoringforsuccessintobaccoregulatoryscience:
Aqualitativestudy.TobaccoRegulatoryScience.3(3),280-292.
doi:10.18001/TRS.3.3.4
Sabharwal,M.(2013).FromGlassCeilingtoGlassCliff:Womeninseniorexecutive
service.JournalofPublicAdministrationResearchandTheory.25(2),399-426.
doi:10.1093/jopart/mut030
Sahoo,D.K.&Lenka,U.(2016).Breakingtheglassceiling:Opportunityforthe
organization.IndustrialandCommercialTraining.48(6),311-319.
doi:10.1108/ICT-02-2015-0017
Sainz,M.,Meneses,J.,Lopez,B.,&Fabregues,S.(2014).Genderstereotypesand
attitudestowardsinformationandcommunicationtechnologyprofessionals
inasampleofSpanishsecondarystudents.SexRoles.74,154-168.
doi:10.1007/s11199-014-042-2
Saunders,B.,Sim,J.,Kingstone,T.,Baker,S.,Waterfield,J.,Bartlam,B.,…Jinks,C.
Saturationinqualitativeresearch:Exploringitsconceptualizationand
operation.Quality&Quantity.52(4),1893-1907.doi:10.1007/s11135-017-
0574-8
Sheehan,S.(2014).Aconceptualframeworkforunderstandingtranscendental
phenomenologythroughthelivedexperiencesofbiblicalleaders.Emerging
LeadershipJourneys.7(1),10-20.Retrievedfrom
http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/elj/home.htm
129
Singleton,R.&Straits,B.C.(2005).Approachestosocialresearch(4thed.).NewYork,
NY:OxfordUniversityPress.
Smith,L.(2013).Workinghardwithgendergenderedlabourforwomeninmale
dominatedoccupationsofmanualtradesandIT.Equality,Diversity&
Inclusion.32(6),592-603.doi:10.1108/EDI-12-2012-0116
Smith,P.,Crittenden,N.,&Caputi,P.(2012).Measuringwomen’sbeliefsaboutglass
ceilings:Developmentofthecareerpathwayssurvey.GenderinManagement:
AnInternationalJournal,27(2),68-80.doi:10.1108/17542411211214130
Socratous,M.,Galloway,L.,&Kamenou-Aigbekaen,N.(2016).Motherhood:An
impedimenttoworkplaceprogression?ThecaseofCyprus.Equality,
DiversityandInclusion:AnInternationalJournal.35,5/6,364-382.
doi:10.110/EDI-02-2016-0019
Sohn,B.K.(2017).Phenomenologyandqualitativedataanalysissoftware(QDAS):A
carefulreconciliation.Forum:QualitativeSocialResearch.18(1),389-411.
Retrievedfromhttp://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php.fqs
Spowart,L.,&Nairn,K.(2014).(Re)performingemotionsindiary-interviews.
QualitativeResearch.14(3),327-340.doi:10.1177/1468794112473498
Staller,K.M.(2012).Epistemologicalbootcamp:Thepoliticsofscienceandwhat
everyqualitativeresearcherneedstoknowtosurviveintheacademy.
QualitativeSocialWork.12,395-413.doi:10.1177/1473325012450483
Stewart,D.W.,&Shamdasani,P.N.(1990).Focusgroups:Theoryandpractice.
NewburyPark,CA:SagePublications.
130
Subramaniam,G.,Khadri,N.A.M.,Maniam,B.,&Ali,E.(2016).Theglassceiling
phenomenon-Doesitreallyaffectwomen’scareeradvancementinMalaysia?
JournalofOrganizationalCulture,CommunicationsandConflict.20,81-89.
Retrievedfromhttps://www.abacademies.org/journals/journal-of-
organizational-culture-communications-and-conflict-home.html
Sweida,G.L.&Woods,J.A.(2015).Comparingthedevelopmentofentrepreneurial
self-efficacyoffemaleentrepreneursinmale-andfemale-dominated
industries.JournalofDevelopmentalEntrepreneurship.20(3),1-20.
doi:10.1142/S1084946715500181
Tansey,T.N.&Iwanaga,K.,Bezyak,J.,&Ditchman,N.(2017).Testinganintegrated
self-determinedworkmotivationmodelforpeoplewithdisabilities:Apath
analysis.RehabilitationPsychology.62(4),534-544.doi:10.1037/rep0000141
Tareef,A.B.(2013).Therelationshipbetweenmentoringcareerdevelopmentof
highereducationfacultymembers.CollegeStudentJournal.47(4),703-710.
Retrievedfromhttp://www.projectinnovation.com/college-student-
journal.html
Tsang,E.W.K.(2013).Casestudymethodology:Casual,contextual,andtheorizing.
JournalofInternationalManagement.19,195-202.
doi:10.1016/j.intman.2012.08.004
UnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor.(n.d.).Frequentlyaskedquestions(FAQs)
discriminationonthebasisofsex.Retrievedfrom
131
https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/SexDiscrimination/sexdiscrimination_faqs.htm#
Q10
UnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor.(2013).BureauofLaborStatistics,Unemployed
personsbyoccupationandsex.Retrievedfrom
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cpseea30.htm
UnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor.(2015).OccupationalOutlookHandbook.
ComputerandITOccupations.Retrievedfrom
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/home.htm
UnitedStatesDepartmentofLabor.(2016).BureauofLaborStatistics,Employment
bydetailedoccupation.Retrievedfrom
https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_102.htm
Uzoigwe,A.G.,Lowe,W.Y.,&Noor,S.N.M.(2016).Predictorsofwork-familyrole
conflictanditsimpactonprofessionalwomeninmedicine,engineering,and
ITinNigeria.AsiaPacificJournalofPublicHealth.28(7),629-637.
doi:10.1177/1010539516667782
Vagle,M.D.(2014).CraftingPhenomenologicalResearch.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Valerio,M.A.,Rodriguez,N.,Winkler,P.,Lopez,J.,Dennison,M.,Yuanyuan.L.,&
Turner,B.J.(2016).Comparingtwosamplingmethodstoengagehard-to-
reachcommunitiesinresearchprioritysetting.BMCMedicalResearch
Methodology,16,1-11.doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z
132
Varma,R.,&Kapur,D.(2015).DecodingfemininityincomputerscienceinIndia.
CommunicationsoftheACM.58(5),56-62.doi:10.1145/266339
Vongalis-Macrow,A.(2016).Itsabouttheleadership:Theimportanceofwomen
leadersdoingleadershipforwomen.NASPAJournalAboutWomeninHigher
Education.9(1),90-103.doi:10.1080/19407882.2015.1114953
Way,Susan.(2015).MidcareerWomenLeavingIT:AnExaminationofthe
Phenomenon.(Doctoraldissertation).RetrievedfromProQuestDissertations
Publishing.(3684732).
Wentling,R.M.,2,&Thomas,S.(2009).WorkplaceCultureThatHindersandAssists
theCareerDevelopmentofWomeninIT.IT,Learning&PerformanceJournal,
25(1),25–42.Retrievedfromhttps://www.learntechlib.org/j/ISSN-1535-
1556
Willis,D.G.,Sullivan-Bolyai,S.,Knafl,K.,&Cohen,M.Z.(2016).Distinguishing
featuresandsimilaritiesbetweendescriptivephenomenologicaland
qualitativedescriptionresearch.WesternJournalofNursingResearch.38(9),
1185-1204.doi:10.1177/0193945916645499
Wood,R.&Bandura,A.(1989).Socialcognitivetheoryoforganizational
management.AcademyofManagementReview.14(3),361-384.
doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4279067
Woszczynski,AB.,Dembla,P.,&Safar,H.(2016).Gender-baseddifferencesin
cultureintheIndianITworkplace.InternationalJournalofInformation
Management.36(4),507-519.doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.002
133
AppendixA:ParticipantInvitationandConsentForm
Date:XXMonth,2019YouareinvitedtoparticipateinaresearchstudyofwomenwhoarecurrentlyworkinginseniorleadershippositionsintheITfield.Inordertoparticipateinthisstudy,youmustmeetthefollowingrequirements:
1. FemaleseniorleadercurrentlyworkingintheITfield(Seniorlevelpositionsforthisstudyincludepresident,vicepresident,C-levelpositionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chiefoperationsofficer(COO),chiefinformationofficer(CIO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),vicepresidentofIT(VPofIT)anddirectorandmanageriallevelpositions)
2. Workincurrentrolefor2ormoreyears3. LiveandworkinthecontinentalUnitedStates
IamMichelleNewsome,adoctoralcandidateatWaldenUniversityandwillbeconductingthisstudy.Iam35yearsoldandhavebeenworkedintheITfieldfor10years.BackgroundInformation:ThepurposeofthisstudyistounderstandthelivedexperiencesofwomenseniorleadersintheITfieldtogainanunderstandingoftheircareeradvancementintoseniorleadershippositions.Procedures:Ifyouagreetobeinthisstudy,youwillbeaskedtobeavailableforapproximately60minutesforeitheratelephonecallorafreevideoconferencecallinterviewaboutyourcareeradvancementintoaseniorleadershipposition.Withyourpermission,telephoneorvideoconferenceinterviewswillberecorded.Onlytheaudioportionoftheinterviewwillberecorded.Therewillnotbeanyvideorecordingoftheinterviewwhatsoever.Again,youhavetheoptiontodeclinebeingrecordedifyouchoose.Oncetheinterviewiscompleted,Iwilltranscribetheinterviewintowrittentext.Iwillemailyouacopyofthewrittentranscriptoftheinterviewwithin24-48hoursforyoutoreviewandverifythatIhavedocumentedyourwordsandexperiencesaccurately.Ifanychangesneedtobemadetoyourinterviewstatement,pleaseemailmethecorrections.Ifyouagreetothetranscriptprovided,pleasesimplyemailmebackstatingthatyou“agree”.Theverificationstepwilltakeapproximately15-20minuteslong.
134
VoluntaryNatureoftheStudy:Yourparticipationinthisstudyisstrictlyvoluntary.Youarefreetoacceptorturndownthisinvitation.Ifyoudecidetobeinthisstudynow,youmaywithdrawfromthestudylater.Oncetheinterviewbegins,youmayrequesttostoporterminateyourparticipationatanytime.RisksandBenefits:Thereareminimalrisksassociatedwithparticipatinginthisstudy.Intheeventthatyoufeelstressedoruncomfortable,youmayterminateyourparticipationatanytime.Youmayrefusetoansweranyquestionsyouconsiderinvasive,toopersonal,orstressful.ThebenefitofthisstudymayassistinattractingwomentothefieldofIT.Inaddition,thisstudymayprovidearoadmaptowomenalreadyworkinginITwhoaspiretosenorleadershippositionsinthefield.Compensation:Therewillbenocompensationprovidedforyourparticipationinthisstudy.Youwillreceiveanexecutivesummaryoftheresearchstudy’sfindings.Confidentiality:Withyourconsent,theinterviewwillberecordedforresearchpurposes.Youmaydeclinetoberecordedatanypointintimeduringtheinterview.Thewrittenandaudiorecordsforthisstudywillbekeptinalockedboxandmaintainedinasecurelocation.Theresearcherwillnotincludeanyinformationthatwillmakeitpossibletoidentifyyou.YouwillsimplybelabeledasParticipant1,Participant2,Participant3,etc.After5yearsofthestudy’scompletion,Iwilldestroyallpaperandelectronicdatacollectedduringthestudy.Participation:Aspreviouslymentioned,thereareminimalriskswithbeingaparticipantinthisstudy.Yourconsentmeansthatyoudonothaveanypersonalorprofessionalconflictsofinterestwithbeingincludedinthisstudy.Ifyoumeettherequirementsandarewillingtobeaparticipantinthisstudy,pleasereplybacktothisemailorchatmessagewiththewords“IConsent”.WhenIreceiveyourconsent,Iwillreplybackwithinin24hourstoscheduleyourinterview.
135
ContactsandQuestions:TheresearcherconductingthisstudyisMichelleNewsome.Youmayaskanyquestionsyouhavenow.Ifyouhavequestionslater,youmaycontacttheresearchervia(850)420-6518;michelle.newsome2@waldenu.edu.Ifyouwanttotalkprivatelyaboutyourrightsasaparticipant,youcancalltheResearchParticipantAdvocateatmyuniversityat612-312-1210.WaldenUniversity’sapprovalnumberforthisstudyis05-06-19-0485770anditexpiresonMay5th,2020.Pleasekeepacopyofthisconsentformforyourrecords.
136
AppendixB:InterviewProtocol
Introduction
Goodmorning(afternoon).Iwouldliketofirststartbysayingthankyoufor
participatinginthisresearchstudycalled“WomenLeadersinIT:A
PhenomenologicalStudyofTheirCareerPath”.MynameisMichelleNewsome.The
purposeofthisstudyistounderstandthelivedexperiencesofwomensenior
leadersintheITfieldtogainanunderstandingoftheircareeradvancementinto
seniorleadershippositions.Theresearchwillfocusontheexperiencesofwomen
seniorleadersintheITfieldinordertounderstandthecontributingfactorsoftheir
success.
Asareminder,whenyoureturnedyouremailstatingIconsent,youhave
alreadyagreedtoparticipateinthestudy.Allresearchnotesandaudiorecordings
willbestoredinalockboxinasecurelocation.Youridentitywillnotbedisclosedat
anypointduringthestudy.Allmaterialsthroughouttheprocessofthestudywill
haveParticipant1,2,etc.OnlyIwillknowtheparticipantnamesandtheircodes.
Thecodelistwillbestoredinalockboxforfiveyearsandthendestroyedwiththe
restofthedata.Allresearchnotesandaudiorecordingswillbestoredinalockbox
inasecurelocation.Whenpresentingtheresearchfindingsofthestudy,direct
quoteswillsimplystate“Participant#1stated…).
Injustafewminutes,wewillstarttheinterview,whichwillconsistoffive
demographicquestions.Ifatanytimeduringthisinterviewyouhaveanyquestions,
pleaseletmeknowsothatIcanaddressthem.Also,ifyoudonotwishtoanswera
137
question,youmaydecline.Ifyoudonotwishtocontinuetheinterviewforany
reason,wecanstopatanytime.Youmayasktoberemovedfromthestudyatany
time.Ifyouneedabreakforanyreason,pleaseletmeknow.
Wewillnowstarttheinterviewandbeginrecording
DemographicQuestionnaire
Thefollowingquestionswillbeusedtocollectdemographicinformation.
1. Whatisyourethnicity?AfricanAmerican__Asian__Caucasian__Hispanic__Twoormoreraces__Other,pleasespecify__
2. Whatisyouragebracket?20-29__30-39__40-49__50-59__60+__
3. Foreacheducationaldegreeobtained,pleasespecifyyourmajorandconcentrationsaswellasanyminorsobtained?_________________________
4. Whatisyourcurrentjobtitle?____________
5. Howlonghaveyoubeeninyourcurrentposition?___________
6. Whatistheprimaryindustrythatyouworkin?______________
InterviewQuestion
Whatistheessenceofthelivedprofessionalandpersonalexperiencesin
yourcareeradvancement,whichledyoutoachieveyourseniorlevelpositionsin
theITfield?
Conclusion
Thisconcludesourinterview.Isthereanythingyouwouldliketoaddordo
youhaveanyadditionalquestions?Thankyoufortakingthetimeoutofyourbusy
138
scheduletoparticipantinthisstudy.Youwillreceiveafreecopyoftheexecutive
summaryofthestudyonceitiscompleted.
IwouldliketoverifyyouremailaddressatthistimesothatIcanemailyoua
transcriptofthisinterviewforyoutoreviewandconfirmthatIcapturedyour
wordsandexperiencesaccurately.
Thankyou
139
AppendixC:SocialMediaAnnouncement
CallingWomenLeadersintheITField!
IwanttohearaboutyourcareerpathexperiencesintheITfield!Yourparticipation
inthisstudycouldbenefitwomenalreadyworkinginthefieldandthosewhoare
interestedinenteringthefield.
Pleasecontactmeatmichelle.newsome@waldenu.eduifyoumeetthefollowing
requirements:
1. FemaleseniorleadercurrentlyworkingintheITfield(Seniorlevel
positionsforthisstudyincludepresident,vicepresident,C-level
positionssuchaschiefexecutiveofficer(CEO),chiefoperations
officer(COO),chieftechnologyofficer(CTO),directorand
manageriallevelpositions)
2. Workincurrentroleforatleast2yearsormore
3. LiveandworkinthecontinentalUnitedStates.
Pleasefeelfreetosharethisannouncementwithotherwomenthatmaybequalified
forthisstudy.Yourparticipationisgreatlyappreciated!