48
ANT 102: Archaeology: Mysteries and Controversies Looting: Taking ancient artifacts, usually for personal gain, without paying any attention to archaeological context Nov. 12 th : Looting

Wk 13 looting part 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wk 13 looting part 1

ANT 102: Archaeology: Mysteries and Controversies

Looting: Taking ancient artifacts, usually for personal gain,without paying any attention to archaeological context

Nov. 12th: Looting

Page 2: Wk 13 looting part 1

1. Recognizing multiple dimensions to a good question

3. Evaluating evidence

2. Recognizing multiple answers to a question or a problem

5. Exploring the ethical implications of differing approaches, methods or conclusions

4. Developing potential solutions to problems based on sound evidence and reasoning

Aspects of Intellectual Inquiry in the Social Sciences

Looting: Taking ancient artifacts, usually for personal gain,without paying any attention to archaeological context

Page 3: Wk 13 looting part 1

1. Recognizing multiple dimensions to a good question

Aspects of Intellectual Inquiry in the Social Sciences

3. Evaluating evidence

2. Recognizing multiple answers to a question or a problem

5. Exploring the ethical implications of differing approaches, methods or conclusions

4. Developing potential solutions to problems based on sound evidence and reasoning

Looting: Taking ancient artifacts, usually for personal gain,without paying any attention to archaeological context

Page 4: Wk 13 looting part 1

General introduction to lootingWhat, who, why, how

Why looting is bad

Is there anything good about looting?

Who should be blamed?

What is the scale of looting?

Can looting be stopped? How?

Page 5: Wk 13 looting part 1

…An authentic Aztec representationof Tlazolteotl, the Aztec goddess of childbirth, filth, sin, and regeneration1400 AD.

An imaginedprop based on

Page 6: Wk 13 looting part 1

Slack Farm, Kentucky

Page 7: Wk 13 looting part 1

Dennis Banks

Slack Farm,Union County,

Kentucky

Page 8: Wk 13 looting part 1

Aurich site, pacific coast of Peru

Slack Farm,Union County,

Kentucky

Page 9: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 10: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 11: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 12: Wk 13 looting part 1

General introduction to looting

What: Taking ancient artifacts, usually for personal gain, without paying any attention to archaeological context

Who: Collectors (aristocrats), dealers (aristocrats), middle men, looters (poor people)

Why: Money, Curiosity, Cultural Capital (prestige)

How: from collecting arrowheads, to digging holes with pick and shovel, to mass destruction of ruins by bulldozers and other heavy machinery

Page 13: Wk 13 looting part 1

Scale of looting

Aurich site, pacific coast of Peru

Page 14: Wk 13 looting part 1

Classic Mimbres pots(1000-1130 A.D.)Arizona and New Mexico.

Page 15: Wk 13 looting part 1

Looter’s trench ina Maya mound inBelize, Central America

Page 16: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

Page 17: Wk 13 looting part 1

Looted Maya mound inBelize, Central America

Aurich site, Peru

Slack Farm,Kentucky

Page 18: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

Slack Farm,Kentucky

Slack farm case: lost opportunities to learn about…a) Trade and exchange

e) Relation between Slack Farm people and contemporary tribes

b) Nutrition, disease, age at death, genetic relatedness

c) Impact of European contact on native health d) Impact of European contact on local economy, politics, ritual

Page 19: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

--Where an artifact is found and what it is found with tells us what it was for

stone basin --grinding food?--grinding minerals?--collecting water?

Page 20: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

Maya inkwell carved with glyphsthat talk of a scribe/painter

--Where an artifact is found and what it is found with tells us what it was for

stone basin --grinding corn?--grinding minerals--collecting water?

Page 21: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

--Where an artifact is found and what it is found with tells us what it was for

stone basin --grinding corn?--grinding minerals?--collecting water?

Page 22: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

--Stratigraphic context of an artifact often tells us how old it is

--Where an artifact is found and what it is found with tells us what it was for

Stratigraphy

Page 23: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

--Where an artifact is found and what it is found with tells us what it was for

--What an artifact is found with can tell us about trade and long distance contact

--Stratigraphic context of an artifact is found often tells us how old it is

Page 24: Wk 13 looting part 1

Representation of Andean Staff god, fromthe site of Tiwanaku, Bolivia (circa 800 AD)

Stone-work from Maya area, Mexico (circa 800 AD)

Screen capture from Raiders of the lost Arc

Page 25: Wk 13 looting part 1

Maya vase:approx. 700 AD

Very specific case study about the info.we lose when we do not have context

Page 26: Wk 13 looting part 1

Tikal

Naranjo

Holmul

Ucanal

Caracol

Buenavista

CahalPech

Page 27: Wk 13 looting part 1

hieroglyphs

Tikal

Naranjo

Holmul

Ucanal

Caracol

Buenavista

CahalPech

Page 28: Wk 13 looting part 1

Owned by Itsam BalamOf Ucanal

(according to hieroglyphs)

Owned by K’ak Til of Naranjo(according to hieroglyphs)

Tikal

Naranjo

Holmul

Ucanal

Caracol

Buenavista

CahalPech

Page 29: Wk 13 looting part 1

What we can say WITHOUT context?

Owner was K’ak Til from Naranjo

Painter was Ah Maxam, a well-known master

Used for drinking chocolate

Part of Holmul style, Guatemala

We can’t say as much about most looted artifacts

What we can say WITH context?

Page 30: Wk 13 looting part 1

Tikal

Naranjo

Holmul

Ucanal

Caracol

Buenavista

CahalPech

This pot, known as the Buenavista Vase, was excavatedfrom a nobleman’s tomb at the Belizean site of Buenvista

Page 31: Wk 13 looting part 1

What we can say WITHOUT context?

Owner was K’ak Til from Naranjo

Painter was Ah Maxam, a master

Used for drinking chocolate

Part of Holmul style, Guatemala

Additional things we can learn WITH context

It was found at the ruin of Buenavista, in Belize

It was found in a burial of a young nobleman

K’ak Til was NOT the final owner

Final usage was not for drinking cacao

Found in a burial

Tells us about gift exchange among kings and subordinate leaders,a strategy for consolidating power.

Page 32: Wk 13 looting part 1

Problems with looting

1. Destruction of archaeological sites

2. Loss of information

3. Loss of context

4. It is stealing

Hauberg stela

Maya culture

Probably fromGuatemala (nowin a vault in Seattle) butsince it is lootedwe don’t knowwhere it is from.

Page 33: Wk 13 looting part 1

Is there anything good about looting?

1) Developing countries do not have the resources to preserve the past so it is better to loot artifacts and smuggle them to countries with more resources

--Poor quality museum and storage space

NOT NECESSARILY TRUE!

Page 34: Wk 13 looting part 1

Royal tomb of Sipan, Pacific coast of Peru

Page 35: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 36: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 37: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 38: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 39: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 40: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 41: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 42: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 43: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 44: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 45: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 46: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 47: Wk 13 looting part 1
Page 48: Wk 13 looting part 1

Museum of the Royal Tombs of Sipan,Located in the city of Chiclayo, Peru