Windscale Fire

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    1/12

    Akasha Purohit and Kelly Meehan

    THE WINDSCALE FIRE

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    2/12

    HISTORY

    The Windscale Fire took place at the Windscale nuclear processing plant in Cumberland,

    which is known as Cumbria today.

    The project was started to compete with America and the Soviet Union in the arms race.

    After the Windscale fire was put out, Harold Macmil lan covered up the incident, saying

    that it was the Windscale employees who were in error. This cover-up was used to stop

    the United States from finding out that England was trying to make an atomic bomb.

    Cumberland Cumbria

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    3/12

    SAFETY CONCERN

    The British were not experienced with nuclear processing, Windscale was their first

    nuclear reactor.

    They did not account for the Wigner Effect on graphite cores, which was the underlying

    cause of the incident.

    Eugene WIgner

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    4/12

    THE WIGNER EFFECT

    Displacement of atoms caused by neutron radiation.

    Neutrons hit the crystal lattice structure of Graphite and displace carbon atoms.

    These displaced atoms either find other vacancies within the structure, or become

    interstitials.

    Build up of interstitials causes a build up of potential energy, which eventually releases asheat.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    5/12

    ANNEALING

    Way to combat the Wigner Effect

    Core is heated to 250C

    Displaced carbon atoms slip back into the crystal lattice structure

    Allows for a gradual release of heat

    This process was difficult to do and required higher temperatures each consecutive time.

    Required uranium

    This process wasnt kept in mind during the initial design of the plant, monitoring devices

    for the process werent working properly.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    6/12

    IGNITION

    Britain began focusing on the production of tritium

    Required heating the graphite core to higher temperatures

    This decreased the safety level of the plant, but was overlooked due to the high quantities

    of tritium being produced

    Annealing process was started, but somewhere during the process it is speculated that acan of uranium had ruptured and oxidized, which added to the fire.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    7/12

    TWO UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS AT

    ELIMINATING THE FIRE

    Oxygen

    Since the fans were turned off due to the fact that certain parts of the atomic bomb had

    to be made at high temperatures, a decision was made to turn the blowers in the nuclear

    plant back on to cool down the fire and potentially put it out. However, this only caused

    an increase in temperature.

    Carbon Dioxide

    Since oxygen was not useful, workers decided that carbon dioxide had the potential to

    extinguish the flame. The plant had just received 25 tons of carbon dioxide, however,

    workers were unable to properly haul the carbon dioxide to the fire, and there was an

    insufficient amount that could be used at once.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    8/12

    THE DEBATE

    With both attempts of carbon dioxide and oxygen failing to work, a new contention arose.

    Options for how to put the fire out were running low, and Tom Hughes, who was one of the

    employees and key figures in putting the fire out, decided that it was between dousing the

    fire with water or waiting for it to go out on its own.

    There were several problems with both aspects. If the fire was allowed to remain, not only

    would it progressively get worse, it would also cause large amounts of radiation to spreadmiles from the site. This would risk the lives of people of countless people.

    If the employees tried to put the fire out with the use of water, the nuclear plant had the

    potential to explode. As water is added to molten metal, the metal can oxidize and will

    release hydrogen gas. This hydrogen gas is extremely explosive when introduced to

    outside air. The emission of this hydrogen gas could cause a nuclear explosion, killing all

    of the people left in the plant.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    9/12

    SUCCESS IN ELIMINATING THE FIRE

    Tom Hughes decided that it would be best to subject the fire to water, instead of risking

    the lives of thousands through radiation poisoning. Unable to tell whether the water was

    working in decreasing the temperature when added to the molten metal, and with poor

    knowledge of how much hydrogen gas was being emitted, Tom Hughes got rid of his

    radiation recording badge and climbed the Windscale pile 1 to monitor the inspection

    holes that contained the fire.

    Upon several inspection, Tom Hughes saw that the fire was dying down and also that the

    hydrogen gas was not building up. With the constant amount of water being poured on the

    fire, the potential disaster was able to be averted.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    10/12

    AFTERMATH OF THE WINDSCALE FIRE

    Overall, the design of modern nuclear reactors are different today than when the

    Windscale fire occurred, preventing an incident like this from happening again.

    After the fire was stopped, the production and use of air-cooled reactors in nuclear power

    plants stopped. The Windscale piles have not been used since.

    The amount of radiation that leaked out from the fire at the Windscale piles resulted in

    approximately 240 cases of cancer.

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    11/12

    Windscale Sellafield

  • 7/29/2019 Windscale Fire

    12/12

    REFERENCES

    Arnold, L. Windscale 1957: Anatomy of a Nuclear Accident; Palgrave Macmillan:

    Basingstoke, 2007.

    Crick, M.J.; Linsley, G.S. An Assessment of the Radiological Impact of the Windscale

    Reactor Fire, October 1957. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med[Online] 1984.

    46, (5) 479-506. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553008414551711

    (accessed April 10, 2011).

    Glasstone, S.; Sesonske, A. Nuclear Reactor Engineering: Reactor Systems Engineering;

    Chapman & Hall: London, 1994.

    http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553008414551711http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09553008414551711