Wind Energy Update(Nagy Nanda)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

zgzh

Citation preview

  • www.cd-adapco.com

  • Wind Farm Flow Assessment

  • The EnviroWizard with STAR-CCM+

  • STAR-CCM+ based Wind Resource Assessment: In Use in Industry Today

  • Vestas Site Check Tool for Wind Farm Layout Design

    5

  • And How Is It Done?

    6

    Two Key Java Macros

    An excellent example of customizable STAR-CCM+ (for workflow in any industrial application

  • In the Background: On the Vestas Central HPC Cluster in Denmark

    7

  • Scaling of STAR-CCM+ Application on Vestas Cluster

    8

  • The Business Benefit to Vestas

    Previous procedure required field engineers to send a request and files to Vestas Headquarters CFD Group for processing:

    Average turnaround time to receive necessary 3-D CFD simulation results (data, plots) in standard Vestas report form: 3 weeks

    New, automated push-button procedure, embedded into Vestas Site Check:

    Now fully deployed (since April 2009) to over 100 Vestas engineers around the world

    Average turnaround time from pushing the button to receiving an e-mail with the needed reports: 2 hours

    9 A productivity speed-up of 250:1

  • Accurate Wind Resource Assessment:

    Effects of Forest Canopies

    Powerful State-of-the-Art Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), driven by a wind-farm-specific EnviroWizard GUI, enables highly-automated evaluation of rough terrains with forest canopies to more accurately estimate Annual Electricity Production from proposed wind farms

  • Forest Modeling

    Forest edge = 0.4 roughness

    Forest Height = 20m

    Porosity Coefficients

  • Wake Interactions

    Modeling the turbine interaction problem can generally be split into two problems

    Near Wake Effects 3D effects

    Tip effects

    Stall

    High fidelity models BEM/CFD required

    Far wake (Wind Park Level) including Wake interaction

    Turbulence modelling

    Terrain effects - Lower fidelity model such as actuator

    discs can be used

    NASA AMES Wind Tunnel

  • Accurate Wind Resource Assessment: Wake Effects of Multiple Turbines

    Powerful State-of-the-Art Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), driven by a wind-farm-specific EnviroWizard GUI, enables highly-automated evaluation of very rough terrains and wake effects of multiple turbines to more accurately estimate Annual Electricity Production from proposed wind farms

  • Multiple Wind Turbine Wakes: Formulation Details

  • Wake Interactions

    The STAR-CCM+ EnviroWizard allows the User to investigate the turbine interaction problem in a quick and efficient manner

    Setting up the case automatically

    Every direction must be remeshed

  • Offshore Wind Farm Simulation: Wakes

  • Askervein Hill

    Classic Gaussian Hill Validation Case Research Report, Taylor & Teunissen, MSRB-84-6, 1983

    Wind Direction 210

  • Summary of the Bolund Blind Experiment and CD-adapcos Involvement

    Steve Evans and Dennis Nagy February 2010

  • Most Recent Wind Validation: Bolund Blind Experiment (December 2009)

    Conducted by Risoe/DTU in Denmark (sponsored by Vestas A/S)

    Measured wind data (4 months) on Bolund Island (near Risoesee two photos below and photo on title slide)

    8 measurement mast locations (see middle map below)

    52 different models/methods (from different companies and research establishments around the worlde.g., linear, CFD, wind tunnel) were run (using the data from the two leading-edge masts) for Risoe to compare (blind) with their remaining measurements.

    CD-adapco submitted CFD runs with STAR-CCM+: Were run during Sept/Oct 09

    Results (anonymousgathered and organized by Risoe/DTU) were presented at the Bolund Workshop (Roskilde, Denmark, Dec. 3-4, 2009)

    19

  • Bolund Experiment: CD-adapco Participation

    Black Crosses - Met Mast locations

  • Sample Results from Bolund Experiment (239)

    Turbulent Kinetic Energy

    Pink - STAR-CCM+ RANS Black square Experiment Red/Blue dots Scale Model(tunnel)

  • General Bolund Workshop Conclusions

    Linear models (WAsP-like) are less accurate on complex terrains.

    CFD is clearly more accurate. Quoting from the Risoe/DTU presentation: You can get good results with most [CFD] solvers; The user is more important than the solver

    i.e., in CD-adapcos opinion, all CFD results were similarly accurate, so the practical issue becomes one of speed, automation, and ease of use

  • Detailed Wind Flow Around Wind Turbines

  • 24

  • Individual Turbine Wake Turbulence (Animated)

    25

  • Pollution Flow in Complex Energy Production Environments