Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Context:
http://www.pellinstitute.org/downloads/publications-Indicators_of_Higher_Education_Equity_in_the_US_2016_Historical_Trend_Report.pdf
2
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Context:
http://www.pellinstitute.org/downloads/publications-Indicators_of_Higher_Education_Equity_in_the_US_2016_Historical_Trend_Report.pdf
3
Personalized Learning
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Personalized learning seeks to accelerate the student learning process by tailoring the instructional environment to address the needs and skills of individual learners. There are many approaches to the personalization of learning, and information technology is a powerful enabler for postsecondary institutions committed to delivering student-centered instructional models and improving retention and graduation rates…
http://www.aplu.org/projects-and-initiatives/personalized-learning-consortium/about-the-consortium/index.html
4
What is Adaptive Learning?“As an approach to creating a personalized learning experience for
students, adaptive learning takes a sophisticated, data-driven, and in
some cases, non-linear approach to instruction and remediation,
adjusting to a learner’s interactions and demonstrated performance
level and subsequently anticipating what types of content and
resources learners’ need at a specific point in time to make
progress.”Source: Tyton Partners, "Learning to Adapt: Understanding the Adaptive Learning Supplier Landscape," April 2013.
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 5
“Anyone who has ever been in a classroom – where as a student or instructor –knows that not all students procced at the same pace.” <Tyton Partners>
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 6
Well designed adaptive learning experiences (and products) have common attributes and approaches.
• What students should know and be able to do at the end of the learning experience (lesson, unit, course)
Learning Outcomes
• Exposition and multimedia activities that foster active student engagement and lay foundations for future study
Instructional Content
• Scaffolded practice that promotes learning-by-doing and assesses simultaneously (followed by summative assessment)
Activities & Assessments
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 7
Adaptive Learning
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxUW_z9iA2Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EBYMqSlyZc
8
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Subject Matter Expert
Learning Design
Adaptive Technology
9
Faculty Interest in Adaptive LearningLevel the learning (playing) field among students
Data about student performance
Changing what pedagogical strategies are used in the classroom
Using Adaptive Learning products for content knowledge (lower level Bloom’s/drill and practice)
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 10
Faculty Reactions to Adaptive
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VstYwLEpT0
11
APLU Accelerating the Adoption of Adaptive Courseware Grant
CROSS-INSTITUTION COLLABORATION
Targeting similar programs and courses
Adopting from a list of approved adaptive courseware suppliers and products
Sharing information within the cohort by campus-based program managers
Common reporting requirements
FACULTY ENGAGEMENT METHODS
Incentives (money, time, teaching support)
Training and instructional design support
Department-level adoption decisions
Peer learning communities
Senior leadership investment and recognition
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 12
Process Amongst Grantees
Recognize the uniqueness of each institution and faculty
Recognize this is not NECESSARILY a linear process
Recognize this is collaborative amongst faculty, instructional support and leadership
Use this as a guide for other institutions
Establishing Conditions for
SuccessPlanning
Product / Partner
Selection
Implement-ation
Evaluation & Iteration
Note: Implementation phases above are illustrative and will be refined with participating institution input
1301/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Types of Adaptive Learning ProductsADAPTIVE COURSEWARE
Includes most popular courses
Limited flexibility to customize
Not all dashboards are the same
Faculty Roles
ADAPTIVE PLATFORMS
Content Customization
Authoring Content
Assessment
Redesign Process
Can Be More Time Intensive
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Customizable
14
Adaptive Courseware Suppliers & Products1. Acrobatiq
2. Cerego (Macroeconomics, Introduction to Statistics)
3. Cengage Learning Mindtap (Cerego)
4. CogBooks
5. Fishtree
6. Fulcrum Labs
7. Knewton
8. LeAP by D2L
9. Learning Objects
10. LoudCloud
11. Lumen Waymaker
12. McGraw-Hill Education ALEKS and Smartbook
13. Macmillan Learning Curves
14. Open Learning Initiative at Carnegie Mellon University
15. Open Learning Initiative at Stanford University
16. OpenStax Tutor
17. Pearson MyLab and Mastering with Adaptive Practice
18. Realizeit
19. Smart Sparrow
20. WileyPlus with ORION (Snapwiz)
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 15
Results: After Six Months: 22,000 enrollments
Disciplines adopting courseware
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
Other6%
English Comp1% History
3%
Business5%
Psychology8%
Physics9%
Modern Languages
11%Chemistry12%
Biology/Life Sciences
14%
Mathematics14%
Economics17%
16
Adoptions by Product, Fall 2017Approved products not in use during Fall 2017: Acrobatiq
Cerego
Fishtree
Fulcrum Labs
Knewton
LeAP by D2L
LoudCloud
Open Learning Initiative at Carnegie Mellon University
Open Learning Initiative at Stanford University
Smart Sparrow
17
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
9
17
18
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
OpenStax Tutor
Realizeit
Learning Objects
Lumen Waymaker
WileyPlus with ORION (Snapwiz)
Cengage Learning Mindtap (Cerego)
CogBooks
Macmillan Learning Curves
McGraw-Hill Education ALEKS
McGraw-Hill Education Smartbook
Pearson MyLab & Mastering with AdaptivePractice
Count of Courses Adoptions by Product Fall 2017
Note: Includes actual adoptions, Fall 2017 term onlySource: Grantee Program Manager meetings, December 201701/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
How to Choose a VendorSelection Framework: Courseware in Context Framework
EdTech Management & Efficacy
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 18
Highlights of OutcomesScaling is difficult but forces an important conversation around student success in academic courses
Pedagogy changes in the classroom result from having very timely performance data
Some are wildly successful immediately
Most success is through iteration
Alignment with program/department chairs, instructional support and faculty are more successful than any one group pushing forward
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 21
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU
CSU Implementation Progress to Date
First Year French I
First Year French II
First Year German I
First Year German II
First Year Spanish I
First Year Spanish II
General Physics I
General Physics II
Principles of Microeconomics
Appreciation of Philosophy
Attributes of Living Systems
Fundamentals of Accounting
Introduction to Astronomy
Introduction to Mechanical Engineering
Humans and Other Animals
Principles of Human Biology
Principles of Macroeconomics
First Year French I
First Year French II
First Year German I
First Year German II
First Year Spanish I
First Year Spanish II
General Physics I
General Physics II
Principles of Microeconomics
American Government & Politics
Biology of Organisms- Animals & Plants
General Chemistry series
General Psychology
General Sociology
Introduction to Financial Accounting
Introduction to Managerial Accounting
Media in Society
Moral and Social Problems (Philosophy)
Physics for Scientists & Engineers I
Physics for Scientists & Engineers II
Appreciation of Philosophy
Attributes of Living Systems
Fundamentals of Accounting
Introduction to Astronomy
Introduction to Mechanical Engineering
Humans and Other Animals
Principles of Human Biology
Principles of Macroeconomics
First Year French I
First Year French II
First Year German I
First Year German II
First Year Spanish I
First Year Spanish II
General Physics I
General Physics II
Principles of Microeconomics
YEAR 2YEAR 1 YEAR 3
Currently RecruitingDesigning /
Piloting
3,124 enrollments
Anticipate 15,000-22,000 enrollments
Anticipate 8,300 enrollments
Goal 12,300-16,300 enrollments
22
Fall 2017Courses: 24
Sections
Enrollments: 6200
Spring 2018Courses: 30
Sections
Enrollments: 5700
Spring 2017Courses: 10
Sections: 28
Enrollments: 2000
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 23
Math and Psychology Fall term results
• MTH 111 (College Algebra)• DFW rate dropped 8.2%, from 36.6% in F16 to 28.4% in F17
• Ecampus dropped 23.4%, from 67.3% to 43.9%
• Decreased achievement gaps across the board including:
• Underrepresented students - DFW rate dropped by 9.7%
• First Generation students - DFW rate dropped by 9.4%
• MTH 103 (Algebraic Reasoning)• DFW rate dropped 13.6%, from 32.9% in F16 to 19.3% in F17
• PSY 201• DFW rate has dropped 5.1%, from 19.3% in F14 to 14.2% in F17
• PSY 202• DFW rate has dropped 22.8%, from 31.1% in F14 to 8.3% in F17
01/22/2018
2018 The Personalized Learning Consortium at APLU
24
25
College Algebra student success rates increased with ALEKS
ALEKS +5-8%
01/22/2018 2018 The Personalized Learning Consortium at APLU
25
26
Stretch Semester helps even more algebra students
Stretch +11-12%
01/22/2018 2018 The Personalized Learning Consortium at APLU
26
27
15%20%
28%21% 17%
47%
23% 19%
8%3%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
A B C D E
% S
tude
nts
Grade
Microeconomics Fall 2016 and 2017Midterm Exam #1 Grade Distribution
Fall 16
Fall 17
8% 5%
23% 23%
42%
21%28%
17% 14%21%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
A B C D E
% S
tude
nts
Grade
Microeconomics Fall 2016 and 2017Midterm Exam #2 Grade Distribution
Fall 16
Fall 17
Microeconomics exam results improve with Learning Objects
01/22/2018 2018 The Personalized Learning Consortium at APLU
27
Next Round of Data due January 31, 2018
Only six are 18 months into the three years
Georgia State is doing a three way comparison—adaptive, non-adaptive (e-book) and traditional
Not every course is reporting better outcomes but all are reporting no decrease in success
APLU is collecting success, DFW, progression, and retention and will anonymize the data
01/22/2018 2018 THE PERSONALIZED LEARNING CONSORTIUM AT APLU 28