Upload
jaime-randolph
View
22
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Why did a Slave society develop in colonial Virginia?. Big point!. The shift to a slave society was not inevitable!. The shift to a slave society was not inevitable!. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Why did a Slave society develop in colonial Virginia?
Big point!
• The shift to a slave society was not inevitable!
The shift to a slave society was not inevitable!
• The status of Africans in 17th century Virginia was fluid and ambiguous until the establishment of slave codes at the turn of the 18th century.
Problems in VirginiaProblem #1: Land but no labor!
• Lots of land!– Available and unused, from a English
perspective
Problems in VirginiaProblem #1: Land but no labor!
• Lots of land!– Available and unused, from a English
perspective– Landowning tied to idea of “independence”
• Landowners had control of their lives and livelihood
Problems in VirginiaProblem #1: Land but no labor!
• Lots of land!– Available and unused, from a English
perspective– Landowning was tied to idea of
“independence”• Landowners had control of their lives and livelihood
– Landlessness equated to “dependence”• A tenant was subject to the landlord
Problem #2: Profitable commodity but no labor
• Plenty of land to grow tobacco and plenty of demand in Europe
Problem #2: Profitable commodity but no labor
• Plenty of land to grow tobacco and plenty of demand in Europe– Demand pushed production
• 60,000 lbs., in 1620
• 35 million lbs., in 1700
Tobacco’s popularity exacerbated the labor shortage
Tobacco’s popularity exacerbated the labor shortage
• Labor intensive crop
Tobacco’s popularity exacerbated the labor shortage
• Labor intensive crop• Many tedious,
relatively unskilled, steps– Planting
– Tending
– Harvesting
– Drying
– Packing
Lots of land, profitable crop, but who’s going to work it?
• How about using Indians?– The Spanish did!
Lots of land, but who’s going to work it?
• Indians?– The Spanish did!
• Didn’t work in Virginia
Lots of land, but who’s going to work it?
• Indians?– The Spanish did!
• Didn’t work in Virginia– Could easily run away, knew the land
Lots of land, but who’s going to work it?
• Indians?– The Spanish did!
• Didn’t work in Virginia– Could easily run away, knew the land– Had “military” backing, support of allies
Lots of land, but who’s going to work it?
• Indians?– The Spanish did!
• Didn’t work in Virginia– Could easily run away, knew the land– Had “military” backing, support of allies– Had suffered depopulation
Lots of land, but who’s going to work it?
• Indians?– The Spanish did!
• Didn’t work in Virginia– Could easily run away, knew the land
– Had “military” backing, support of allies
– Had suffered depopulation
– Too dispersed• No encomiendas in British America
A solution: Indentured Servants
Indentured servants
• An indenture, or contract, to labor in exchange for passage to America.
Indentured servants
• An indenture, or contract, to labor in exchange for passage to America.
• Terms ranged from four to seven years
Indentured servants
• An indenture, or contract, to labor in exchange for passage to America.
• Terms ranged from four to seven years
• Few rights, often cruel treatment
• Why would anyone do this?
• Why would anyone do this?
• To escape poverty in England!
Domestic problems in England
• Population growth
Domestic problems in England
• Population growth
• Eviction of tenant farmers
Domestic problems in England
• Population growth
• Eviction of tenant farmers
• Growing poverty and pressure on English cities
Opportunity for aspiring aristocrats
• Headright system
Opportunity for aspiring aristocrats
• Headright system– 50 acres of land for passage of laborer
Opportunity for aspiring aristocrats
• Headright system– 50 acres of land for passage of laborer– Often times ship’s captains transported
potential servants and sold them upon arrival
Keeping up with the Byrds
• William Byrd I– To Virginia, 1670
Keeping up with the Byrds
• William Byrd I– To Virginia, 1670
– Grandfather, a ship’s captain
Keeping up with the Byrds
• William Byrd I– To Virginia, 1670
– Grandfather, a ship’s captain
– Collected a substantial amount of “good” land in Virginia through headrights
“Good” land went quickly
• Wealthy able to grab up land along waterways
“Good” land went quickly
• Wealthy able to grab up land along waterways
• The Byrds’ land was along the James and Potomac rivers
“Good” land went quickly
• Wealthy able to grab up land along waterways
• The Byrds’ land was along the James and Potomac rivers
• Advantage to wealthy
But while everything was coming up tobacco, it was not coming up
roses!
• Problems with indentured servants
Problems with indentured servants
• Runaways
Problems with indentured servants
• Runaways• Rights of Englishmen
limited control by masters
Problems with indentured servants
• Runaways• Rights of Englishmen
limited control by masters
• Frustration upon completion of indenture
Frustration upon completion of indenture
• Little “good” land available– Distant from waterways– On fringe of English settlement
Moving toward African slavery
• Precedent in Latin America
Moving toward African slavery
• Precedent in Latin America– Caribbean, Brazil
Moving toward African slavery
• First African slaves to Jamestown, 1619
African slavery
• Very limited for most of the 17th century
African slavery
• Very limited for most of the 17th century– More expensive than servants
• Perpetual servitude
African slavery
• Very limited for most of the 17th century– High mortality among field hands
• Rigors of work, disease
• Slavery was a bad investment
African slavery: not a foregone conclusion
• Up until the last decades of the 17th century, black status in Virginia was fluid.
African slavery: not a foregone conclusion
• Up until the last decades of the 17th century, black status in Virginia was fluid– Free blacks, some who owned servants!
African slavery: not a foregone conclusion
• Up until the last decades of the 17th century, black status in Virginia was fluid– Free blacks, some who owned servants!– Black indentured servants
African slavery: not a foregone conclusion
• Up until the last decades of the 17th century, black status in Virginia was fluid– Free blacks, some who owned servants!– Black indentured servants– Black slaves
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased longevity in colony
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased longevity in colony– Slavery began to make
sense economically
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased longevity in colony– Slavery began to make
sense economically
• Decreased supply of white servants
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased longevity in colony– Slavery began to make
sense economically
• Decreased supply of white servants
– Improved conditions in England
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased longevity in colony– Slavery began to make
sense economically• Decreased supply of white
servants– Improved conditions in
England– Other colonies
(Pennsylvania, 1681)
Over time, slavery began to make economic sense
• Increased frustration of former servants– Slaves never became
free!
When and why race-based slavery?
• Historians tend to agree that:– Indentured servitude as a model
When and why race-based slavery?
• Historians tend to agree that:– Indentured servitude as a model– Latin America as a model
When and why race-based slavery?
• Historians tend to agree that:– Indentured servitude as a model – Latin America as a model– Economic necessity
When and why race-based slavery?
• Historians tend to agree that:– Indentured servitude as a model – Latin America as a model– Economic necessity– African vulnerability in Virginia
• No rights, no support
When and why race-based slavery?
• Winthrop Jordan: prejudice/racism led to slavery– English pre-disposition
toward Africans• Negation of white
When and why race-based slavery?
• Winthrop Jordan: prejudice/racism led to slavery– English pre-disposition
toward Africans• Negation of white
• Deficient in religion and culture
When and why race-based slavery?
• Winthrop Jordan: prejudice/racism led to slavery– English pre-disposition
toward Africans• Negation of white• Deficient in religion
and culture
– Stereotype: Africans inferior, less than human
Evidence:De facto slavery, 1619-1660
• 1640, runaway servants– Severity of punishment based on race
• 1646, bill of sale– term of service for “Negros” is “forever”
• 1648, bill of sale– Black “servants” more expensive
• 1660, slave code– Blacks legally defined as slaves
When and why race-based slavery?
• Jordan: – Legally defined by the 1660s– Original English prejudice reinforced and
bolstered by economic need and legal definitions. Slavery by custom became slavery by law.
When and why race-based slavery?
• Edmund Morgan: slavery led to prejudice/racism– Status of blacks
ambiguous until late 17th century
– Lower class whites and blacks enjoyed same rights
Black status ambiguous, fluid
• Could own property
• Could sue, testify against, whites
• Could own servants
• Class, not race, divided 17th century Virginia
When and why race-based slavery?
• Morgan:– A calculated strategy by elite plantation owners
to divide the lower class by promoting white supremacy and black inferiority
When and why race-based slavery?
• Morgan:– A calculated strategy by elite plantation owners to
divide the lower class by promoting white supremacy and black inferiority
– An effort to quell the growing unruliness of frustrated former servants as illustrated by Bacon’s Rebellion in 1676.
Slavery supported legally and socially by 1700
• Africans equated with slavery
Slavery supported legally and socially by 1700
• Africans equated with slavery– Manumission limited
Slavery supported legally and socially by 1700
• Africans equated with slavery– Slavery and racism
reinforced each other• blacks are slaves so
must be inferior, since they are inferior, it is proper that they be slaves