Who is Unilever? - [PPT Powerpoint]

Sign in Register

Hide

Who is Unilever?

Category: Documents

DownloadReport copyright

Share:

Copy

Description

2. Who is Unilever?. Worldwide turnover - 40.4 billion in 2004 223,000 employees in 100 countries 150 million people buy our products every day Foods brands account for

Related documents

Hindustan Unilever Ltd is India

IS Planing PT Unilever Indonesia

U_N_I_L_E_V_E_R

UNILEVER

UnilEver

Unilever

Who, Whose, Who Is

who is who 2015

Who is who copia

Who Is Who. Germany

Guess who is who

Who is Who. Russia

Hamlet who is who

Who is who game

Who is who? 1rB

Who is Who in Pakistan

Jozef Viskup - Who is Who

Who is who IAB 2010

Who is who czech republic

Keneos Flyer Who is Who

View more

About us|Terms

out of

Who is Unilever?

Convert error! Download to view*

Worldwide turnover - 40.4 billion in 2004

223,000 employees in 100 countries

150 million people buy our products every day

Foods brands account for over half our sales*Who is Unilever?

*Unilever and Agriculture

*Lead Agriculture ProgrammesTeaStarted 1999Kenya, Tanzania and India

Palm oilStarted 1999Malaysia (sold in 2002), Ghana and Cte dIvoire

TomatoesStarted 1999Brazil and California2005Greece

Spinach and peasStarted 1998UK2000Germany and Italy

*3 strands

LAPs

Roll-out to suppliers

Extension beyond key crops

Sustainable Agriculture Strategy

*Measuring Improvement - 1997**Based on Discussion Paper produced for Unilever by Professor Jules Pretty - University of Essex

*Indicators and Parameters1. Soil Fertility Health4. Pest Management5. Biodiversity6. Value Chain11. Animal Welfare10. Local Economy9. Social/Human Capital8. Water7. Energy2. Soil Loss3. Nutrients

*How...Baseline measurementsField and Factory records

Novel in field measurements Working with experts - NGOs,Academics

*What weve learnt1998 - 2004We generated a lot of data - complexity

Linking practice to improvement

Supply chain driven - wheres the brandequity Prioritization & Pragmatism

2004 to Date:Two TiersIaIbIcIdA1A2A3Indicators & IssuesLAP activities*

Output*

Output Flowchart guiding through process*

Show progress*

Activity ReportsHighly detailed informationMeasurements and ParametersMethodological and technical informationEnvironmental, social and business context*

*Where next...Further prioritization:Using our 2 tier approachReview in 2006Fewer, but truly performance based indicators

Not forgetting our Tier 1 checklist!

*www.unilever.com/ourvalues/environmentandsociety/sustainability/agriculture

Thanks for your attention

LAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.

Is meant to be a new, simple and effective way of reporting, not yet another approachSatisfy information needs of diverse user groups Commitment to measuring and IndicatorsLittle or no extra effort for LAPsProgress Concept presented to and endorsed by LAP leaders at Vienna SA workshop 2004Further discussed with key Community of Practice membersHas now been refined and tested in three LAPs (Ghana, Germany, Colworth)

Is meant to be a new, simple and effective way of reporting, not yet another approachSatisfy information needs of diverse user groups Commitment to measuring and IndicatorsLittle or no extra effort for LAPsProgress Concept presented to and endorsed by LAP leaders at Vienna SA workshop 2004Further discussed with key Community of Practice membersHas now been refined and tested in three LAPs (Ghana, Germany, Colworth)

LAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.

LAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.

Is meant to be a new, simple and effective way of reporting, not yet another approachSatisfy information needs of diverse user groups Commitment to measuring and IndicatorsLittle or no extra effort for LAPsProgress Concept presented to and endorsed by LAP leaders at Vienna SA workshop 2004Further discussed with key Community of Practice membersHas now been refined and tested in three LAPs (Ghana, Germany, Colworth)

LAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.

Is meant to be a new, simple and effective way of reporting, not yet another approachSatisfy information needs of diverse user groups Commitment to measuring and IndicatorsLittle or no extra effort for LAPsProgress Concept presented to and endorsed by LAP leaders at Vienna SA workshop 2004Further discussed with key Community of Practice membersHas now been refined and tested in three LAPs (Ghana, Germany, Colworth)

Is meant to be a new, simple and effective way of reporting, not yet another approachSatisfy information needs of diverse user groups Commitment to measuring and IndicatorsLittle or no extra effort for LAPsProgress Concept presented to and endorsed by LAP leaders at Vienna SA workshop 2004Further discussed with key Community of Practice membersHas now been refined and tested in three LAPs (Ghana, Germany, Colworth)

Example:Under the Nutrient Indicator, a LAP may report [CLICK]on Soil compaction research they do (to improve soil structure and nutrient storage)on a field margin programme (to reduce run-off and)on improvements with their fertiliser strategy (to reduce and better target inputs).All of these activities will, however, be also reported on for other indicators, such as [CLICK]Soil health for the Soil compaction research Biodiversity for the field margins andProduct quality for the fertiliser strategy.

None of these activities exactly matches one Indicator and vice versa.Looks more complicated than it is ...20Looks more complicated than it is ...Refer to EXAMPLES in pre-reading and the example for Ghana brought to the meetingExample shows excerpt from Tier 1 Checklist for German LAP.Progress can be seen by looking at the colour codes at the right hand side.

EXAMPLES1: Classified not relevant; good evidence provided -> green

2: Classified No action (i.e. Considered, but nothing done yet); no sufficient justification ->pinkTier 2 reporting results in short (1 -- 3 pages) reports that can be used in stakeholder communication, both separately and togetherLAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.

LAPs talk about what they do (e.g. research programmes, improvement plans, grower training seminars...). Communication is centred around activities.UL as a company is interested in how these activities relate to the UL approach to SA (Principles, Indicators, show improvement). Communication is centred around addressing issues.