Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    1/18

    Assessment of whitebark pine mortality in the mountainareas of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and the

    associated ecological implications

    W. W. Macfarlane, J. A. Logan and W.R. Kern

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    2/18

    The Greater Yellowstone

    Ecosystem (GYE)

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    3/18

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    4/18

    Their strength lies in their numbers

    andtheir jaws

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    5/18

    Jeff Hicke 2005

    Jesse A. Logan 2009

    A Climate Change Issue

    Winters are becoming mild enough that even adult beetles, a freezeintolerant stage, are surviving => Spring re-emergence of parent adults.

    Brood produced by re-emerged adults may experience enough thermal

    energy to complete the life cycle within the same year of attack.

    Due to reduced chemical defenses (vs. lodgepole pine), these survivingbeetles, at even relatively low densities, are able to kill whitebark pine

    trees.

    The combination of a warming climate and the vulnerability of whitebark

    pine to attacking beetles has resulted in a shift from non-overlapping,

    semivoltine (life cycle requiring two years to complete) generations to

    overlapping, bi-modal, univoltine (life cycle completed in a single year).

    Resulting in unprecedented levels of outbreaks both in intensity and

    spatial distribution (i.e., high-elevation systems).

    1999

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    6/18

    Resulting in an alarming level of mortality in previously

    inhospitable high elevation whitebark pine forests

    EcoFlight 2007

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    7/18

    2009Research Response

    2009

    We developed and used an aerial

    survey method to inventorymountain pine beetle-related

    mortality in whitebark pine, across

    the entire GYE.

    Landscape Assessment System (LAS)

    A collaboration between USDA

    Forest Service, GYCC Whitebark

    Subcommittee , Geo-Graphics

    and NRDC.

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    8/18

    LAS Aerial Survey MethodA tool for mapping the extent and intensity of MPB-related

    mortality in WBP

    Flightlines consisted of 8,673 km and

    were parallel with a fixed interval of

    approximately 8 km apart (4 km oneach side of the plane).

    Flightlines run parallel and along side

    mountain ridges instead of over the

    crest to ensure higher quality oblique

    photos.

    A total of 4,653 photos in 2,595

    small catchments were captured

    GYE Study Area and 2009 LAS Flightlines:

    Flight height: 300-600 m

    above ground elevation

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    9/18

    1 -Occasional spots ofred trees on the landscape

    3 Coalescing spots of red and graytrees across the landscape.

    4 Sea -of -Red where approximately 95% +of the visible forest is dead

    5-6 -Post outbreak forest mortalityratings (gray forest)

    2 -Multiple spots of red and gray treeson the landscape

    LAS Mountain Pine Beetle-related Mortality Categories

    O -No unusual mountain pine beetle-causedmortality (refers to landscapes that may contain theoccasional red tree but there is no evidence of mortality

    expanding to neighboring trees)

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    10/18

    Small Catchment

    Mortality Map

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    11/18

    Photo by JOHN McCOLGAN/BLM Alaska Fire Service

    Jeff Henry, July 23, 1988

    Dunraven Pass - Kathy Peterson; Sept. 1988

    Jim Peaco, 1988

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    12/18

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    13/18

    Serious ecological consequences are

    already in motion

    (1) Reproductive strategies of whitebark asymmetric

    mutualismShawn T. MCKinney, Carl E. Fiedler, AND Diana F. Tomback. 2009.

    Invasive pathogen threatens birdpine mutualism: implications for sustaining a

    high-elevation ecosystem. Ecol. Appl. 19: 597-607.

    (2) Size and scale of disturbance event

    (3) Lack of co-evolved history with whitebark

    Chemical defenses

    Raffa, Bentz, Six & Studentsfungal associates Six & Bentz & their Students

    (4) Distribution of whitebark/lodgepole forest in the GYE

    (5) Synergism with WPBRSix, D. L., and J. Adams. 2006. White pine blister rust severity and selection of

    individual whitebark pine by the mountain pine beetle. J. Entomol. Sci. 47: 345-

    353.

    (6)Serious questions of ecosystem resiliency (See poster)

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    14/18

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    15/18

    Fire Landscape Spatial Pattern

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    16/18

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    17/18

    Main goal: assess ecological

    implications using wildliferesponses to ongoingwhitebark mortality

    At what level of

    whitebark mortality doesa forest stop performingcertain ecologicalfunctions?

    This will help managersfocus protection andrestoration efforts inareas most likely tomaintain/ regainecological function

    2010-11 Research

  • 8/7/2019 Whitebark Pine Die off Aerial Assessment

    18/18

    Acknowledgments: USDA Forest Service, Natural Resources Defense Council