17
Which dust attenuation curve(s) for star forming galaxies? Véronique Buat 1 David Corre 1 , Médéric Boquien 2 , Kasia Malek 3,1 & the HELP/Herschel team 1 LAM, Aix-Marseille Université, France 2 CITEVA, Universidad of Antofagasta, Chile 3 NCNR, Warzawa, Poland Dusting the Universe, Tucson, 2019

Whichdustattenuationcurve(s) for star forminggalaxies? · Véronique Buat 1 David Corre1, Médéric Boquien2, KasiaMalek3,1 & the HELP/Herschel team 1 LAM, Aix-Marseille Université,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Which dust attenuation curve(s)forstarforming galaxies?

    VéroniqueBuat1DavidCorre1,MédéricBoquien2,Kasia Malek3,1

    &theHELP/Herschelteam1LAM,Aix-MarseilleUniversité,France

    2 CITEVA,Universidad ofAntofagasta,Chile3NCNR,Warzawa,Poland

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

  • Dusting theUniverse,Tucson,2019

    Theshape oftheattenuation law is found tovary atlow andhighz,fromdataandsimulations….only fewexamples

    From numerical simulationsNarayanan+18Cousin+19Z=0,SDSS,Salim+18

    ULIRGs atz=2LoFaro+171.5

  • Thederived quantities SFR&Mstar aremodified

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    Theios +19SMC(UVsteep)andCalzetti (UVflat)curves

    (nodust emission)

    Maleketal.2018,HELPprojectCharlot&Fall recipe (NIRflat)andCalzetti (NIRsteep)attenuation lawsLoFaroetal.2017Very flatattenuation curves forULIRGs atz=2

    9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 12.0log(Mstar) [M�]

    0.0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    coun

    ts

    CF00

    Calzetti2000

    LoFaro2017

    Charlot&Fall 00recipe

  • Outline of the talk

    • Formalisms fortheattenuation laws &flexiblerecipes• Thestudy ofaHerschel+3D-HSTsample intheCOSMOSfield• Extinction/attenuation:galaxieshosting Gamma-raysbursts (GRBHs)

    **Comparison with RadiationTransfermodeling**

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

  • 𝐴"#$ = 𝐴$ 𝜆 0.55+

    ,-.

    𝐴"/01 = 𝐴&/01 𝜆 0.55+

    ,234

    Charlot&Fall 2000(CF00)à freeISMslope

    Calzetti+2000(C00)à freeslope

    Themost usual formalisms fortheattenuation laws &flexiblerecipes

    (daCunha+08,,Wild+11,Chevallard+13,LoFaro+17,Malek+18)

    (Buat+11,12,Kriek&Conroy 13,Salmon+15,Zeimann+15,Seon &Draine2016,Corre+18,Wang+18)

    nosingleattenuation lawage dependent attenuation forstars

    t~107 yrs (BC),

    CF00:nBC=nISM=-0.7,µ=0.3

    Asingleattenuation law forallthestellar continuumMWextinction+screen fornebular lines

    C00:δ =0,EBV-factor=0.44

    EBV-factor=E(B-V)star/E(B-V)lines

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    𝑘 𝜆 = 𝐴(𝜆)

    𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉) ×

    𝜆𝜆&

    >

    𝜇 = 𝐴&/01 𝐴&/01 + 𝐴$+

  • • OriginalCF00recipe fortheISM:𝜆-0.7 ,Rv ~5.8

    • Calzetti lawRV=4.05

    0:2 0:3 0:4 0:5 1 2

    wavelength[¹m]

    0:05

    0:1

    0:2

    0:5

    1

    2

    5A

    (¸)=

    A(V

    )

    C00¡ ± = 0Calz¡mod¡ ± = ¡0:6Calz¡mod¡ ± = 0:2CF00¡ slope = ¡0:7CF¡ ISMfree¡ slope = ¡1:1CF¡ ISMfree¡ slope = ¡0:5

    TheCalzetti law is steeper than theCharlot&Fall recipe at𝜆> 𝜆V

    Dusting theUniverse,Tucson,2019

    LoFaro+17,Buat+18

  • 100 101 102 103

    � [µm]

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    tran

    smis

    sion

    GALEX NUV

    CFHT MegaCam u

    Subaru suprime B

    Subaru suprime V

    Subaru suprime r

    Subaru suprime i

    Subaru suprime z

    Subaru suprime y

    UKIRT WFCam J

    CFHT wircam H

    VISTA vircam Ks

    Spitzer IRAC 3.6

    Spitzer IRAC 4.5

    Spitzer IRAC 5.8

    Spitzer IRAC 8.0

    Spitzer MIPS 24

    Herchel PACS 100

    Herchel PACS 160

    Herchel SPIRE 250

    Herchel SPIRE 350

    Herchel SPIRE 500

    21photometric bands+Hαfluxes

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    THECOSMOS3DHSTandHerschelsample

    +Hα+[NII]fluxes

    1e¡ 20 1e¡ 19 1e¡ 18FH®(3D¡ HST)[Wm¡2]

    1e¡ 20

    2e¡ 20

    5e¡ 20

    1e¡ 19

    2e¡ 19

    5e¡ 19

    1e¡ 18

    2e¡ 18

    FH®(¯

    ts)[

    Wm¡

    2]

    Buat+18,A&A,619,A135

    33SEDs,fits with CIGALEPhotometry

    +Emissionlines (Cloudy)Boquien+19

    NUV submm

    0.6

  • 0 0:2 0:4 0:6 0:8 1:0¹

    0

    0:2

    0:4

    0:6

    0:8

    1:0

    E(B¡

    V) s

    tar=

    E(B¡

    V) l

    ine

    ¡1:0 ¡0:8 ¡0:6nISM

    ¡0:6¡0:5¡0:4¡0:3¡0:2¡0:1

    0

    0:1

    0:2

    ±

    Parametersoftheflexibleattenuation recipes:• µ andEBV-factor correlate• nISM and 𝛿 correlate ,inaverage steeper valuesthan theoriginalones.

    -->Nouniversal values

    EBV-factor=0.44

    µ=0.3

    nISM =-0.7

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    =0.54± 0.19=0.60± 0.23

    =-0.33± 0.18=-0.82± 0.19

    𝛿 =0

    EBV-factor

    Buat+18

  • 0 0:5 1:0 1:5 2:0 2:5 3:0

    AV(mag)

    ¡3

    ¡2

    ¡1

    0

    pow

    er¡

    law¡

    expon

    ent[FU

    V]

    0 0:5 1:0 1:5 2:0 2:5 3:0

    AV(mag)

    ¡3

    ¡2

    ¡1

    0

    pow

    er¡

    law¡

    expon

    ent[H¡

    V]

    Comparison with Radiationtransfer modeling ofspiralgalaxieswhich predicts aflattening ofattenuation laws with increasing

    obscuration/inclination(e.g.Pierini+04,Tuffs+04,Law+18&Chevallard+13compilation)

    FUV-VrangeV-Hrange

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    __Chevallard+13■.DBPL-free•Calzetti-like __Chevallard+13

    ■.DBPL-free•Calzetti-like

    stee

    per

    CFfreerecipe

    CFfreerecipe

    Buat+18

  • D.Corre,PhDthesis.Corre,Buat,etal.Inprep

    • 𝜆 < 𝜆V K(𝜆)mod =K(𝜆)C00*(𝜆 /𝜆V)𝛿• 𝜆 >𝜆V K(𝜆)mod =K(𝜆)C00*(𝜆 /𝜆V)𝛿+𝜀

    CANDELS@UMASS,october2018

    Modifying theflexibleCalzetti-like recipe intheNIR?

    RTfrom Seon &Draine2016(various dust models andspatialdistributions)

  • D.Corre,PhDthesis.Corre,Buat,etal.Inprep

    RTfrom Seon &Draine2016(various dust models andspatialdistributions)

    • 𝜆 < 𝜆V K(𝜆)mod =K(𝜆)C00*(𝜆 /𝜆V)𝛿• 𝜆 >𝜆V K(𝜆)mod =K(𝜆)C00*(𝜆 /𝜆V)𝛿+𝜀

    CANDELS@UMASS,october20180 1 2 3

    AV(mag)[H¡ V]

    ¡3

    ¡2

    ¡1

    0

    pow

    er¡

    law¡

    expon

    ent

    ! =0

    Average SD16relation

    Modifying theflexibleCalzetti-like recipe intheNIR?

  • Aselection ofGRBhoststostudy dust extinction/attenuation

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    Corre,BuatInprep.

    GRBhostgalaxieswith:• Atleast5photometric bands,1inFUVrest-frame• Hα,H𝛽 (Kruehler+15)

    Dust attenuation andcomparison with Seon andDraine(2016)models

    Among them:6GRBHs with anextinctioncurvemeasured along thelineofsight oftheGRBafterglow

    à extinction/attenuation comparison

    Corre+18,A&A,617,A141

    D.Corre,2018,PhDthesis

  • Extinctioncurves forGRBHsmeasured with observationsoftheafterglow

    Zafar+18

    Theafterglow is modelled byasingleordoublepower-law:any deviationin theUV-NIRrangeis duetodust extinction

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019Corre+18

  • DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019

    MWlike curves observed

  • Attcurve flatterthan Extcurve

    Attcurve similar toExtcurve

    Attcurve flatterthan Extcurve Attcurve steeper than Extcurve

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019Corre+18

  • Attcurve flatterthan Extcurve

    Attcurve similar toExtcurve

    Attcurve flatterthan Extcurve Attcurve steeper than Extcurve

    DustingtheUniverse,Tucson,2019Corre+18

  • variety of configurations

    flexibility of models & recipes

    Dusting theUniverse,Tucson,2019

    Which dust attenuation curve(s)forstarforming galaxies?

    ANSWER:alot……