Upload
trinhkiet
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
When to Go Green and when Not - an industrial perspective -
Lennart Holm
1
Chairman Perstorp Group & Partner BMC Management
Greenchem November 8, 2010
Presentation
2
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
Presentation
3
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
My own story is closely linked to that of Biomass …
• Grew up in the forest / paper mills
• M Sc Chemical Engineering (Chalmers University)
• 30 years of experience from biomass - forest- and chemicals industry
• Today a combination of Entrepreneur and Board professional
• If any “red line” – it would be RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
• Two engagements I will touch upon today:
– Perstorp Group, Specialty Chemicals – former CEO / today Chairman of the board
– BMC Management, Wood Pellets – one of the founding partners / today non-executive advisor
4
BMC Management AB
• Founded 2007 by five old friends from STORA and McKinsey
• Designs, builds and operates large scale biomass based pellets plants for supply of biofuel to the power industry
• Key Success Criteria: World Class Competitiveness thru Scale and Location
• First plant under construction / start-up April 2011
– Located in Georgia, USA, in the middle of an huge underutilized pine plantation area
– Line One - Capacity 750.000 tpa / Capex approximately 180 mUSD
– Additional investments in infrastructure (railway & port facilities)
– Pilot plant for torrefaction included
– Client: German Utility Giant RWE, pellets intended for power plants in UK & Netherlands
• Second plant in pre-project phase
– Project planned to start mid 2011 with start-up H2 2012
– Location Southern USA
5BMC
Perstorp: Long History with Green Roots
• Today: Specialty Chemicals group with a 1.7 bn € turnover and 2 200 employees across the globe
– Since 1881 in the forests of South Sweden
– Started in “Green Chemistry” / Beech wood through dry distillation to Acetic Acid and Formaldehyde
– Switched to petrochemicals in the 50’s
– Become a conglomerate in the 70-80-90’s
– Merger with Neste Chemicals 2001 and focus on Aldehyde Chemistry
– Biodiesel production from 2007 (Leading producer in Scandinavia)
– Significant growth through acquisitions of additional platforms (caprolactone, isophtalic and isocyanate) in 2007-2008 6
Sulfitsprit
MeOH EtOH Finkelolja
Karbid
Acetylen
Monovinyl-
acetat
Etyl-
diacetat
PVA
PVOH
Polyvinyl
formal
Polivinyl
acetat
Polyvinyl
butyrat
Propanol
Butanol
Amyl
alkohol
Hexanol
Borneol
Propyl
acetat
Butyl
acetat
Amyl
acetat
Hexyl
acetat
Metyl
acetat
EtylacetatMonoklor
acetatÄttiksyra Eten
Acet-
aldehyd
Etyl
propionat
Etyllaktat
Diklor
acetat
Kloral
DDT
Etyl
klorid
Etylhydroxyietyl
cellulosa
Etyl
cellulosa
Oorg.
acetater
Org. Acetater el
motsv alkoholer
Monoklor
ättiksyra
Glykol
syra
Tylose
Eten
klorid
Par-
aldehyd
Mjuknings
Medel MSS
Modotiol
latex
ModotiolEten
klorhydrin
EtenoxidPostonal
Kloro
formAcet-
aldol
Kroton-
aldehyd
Butyr
aldehyd
Smörsyra
Butyl-
butyrat
ButanolEtylmetyl
akrolein
Etylpropyl
akrolein
Etylhex
aldehyd
Etyl
hexanol
Etylhexyl
acetat
Etylbutyl
aldehyd
Etyl
butanol
Etylbutyl
acetat
Butyl
acetat
Butyl
propionat
Butyl
glykolat
Dibutyl
formal
Butyl
glykol
Butyldi
glykol
Bytylglykol
acetat
Butyldiglykol
acetat
Etyl
glykol
Etyl
glykol
acetat
Eten
glykol
Etenglykol
monoacetat
Metyl
glykol
Dieten
glykol
Polyeten
glykoler
Etenglykol
diacetat
Dietenglykol
diacetat
Polyeten
glykolacetat
Metylglykol
acetatEtyl
diglykol
Etyl
triglykol
Etyl
polyglykol
Etyl
diglykol
acetat
Monoetanol
amin
Dietanol
amin
Trietanol
amin
Diklor
bensen
Bensen
Mo och Domsjö’s Chemical Tree in 1945
Källor: Skogen ger. Stockholm 1945. Svensk Trävaru och Pappersmassetidnings årsnummer 1943.
Svensk Kemisk Tidskrift 1962 s.132. Festskrift till Carl Kempe, Uppsala 1964
Biomass Bioethanol
7
Presentation
8
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
Up to 1945 utilization of oil was limited by its availability, then came the “Oil Economy” …
9
the oil
economy
2010
Oil
Price
level
coal &
biomass
economy
2007/08
Oil
Price
Peek
140 USD/bbl
Oil Price and World Production
The Oil Economy Product composition of a Naphtha Cracker
Oil Naphtha
Hydrogen
(ca. 1%)
Ethylene
(26–31%)
Propylene
(14–17%)
C4-cut
(8–11%)
C5-cut
(4–5%)
Aromatics
(18–21%)
Cracker complex in Stenungsund, Sweden
Oil is a phenomenal raw material,
concentrated energy in liquid form
10
However availability is not endless , “Peek Oil” is a reality!
11
… but we will not run out of Oil!
• Supply and demand will regulate consumption
• The consequence will be a substantially higher Oil Price
• High value applications will obviously have the highest paying capability, i.e. get continued access to oil
• When Oil demand will outstrip supply?
– Fewer new mega size findings
– More expensive and risky exploration (deep sea)
– Consumption in China, India and other fast growing regions is rising fast
12
Presentation
13
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
HydroformylationAldol reactionAllylationAcetalisationCannizzaro reactionOxidation HydrogenationOxetane chemistryEsterificationMichael addition AlkoxylationTishchenko reactionRing-open polymerizationNitrationPhosgenationIsocyanate chemistry
Perstorp – Carbon chemistry utilizing a wide range of Technologies to transform a few Basic Raw Materials into a wide range of highly Specialized Products
14
• Oil / Naptha
• Natural gas
• Electricity
• Rape Seed Oil
15
BG PP BG SI BG CA
Perstorp - Manufacturing platforms
Mixed Xylenes Ethylene PropyleneSynthesis gas
PRAL N-Bal I-Bal
2-EHNPROP
DEHP PRA 2-EHA NX 795
Bis-MPA BEPD
PA
Alkoxylates
Ethanol
Propionates
P-244
FX Plants
TMP Neo Penta
FoAc
Boltorn
Silage
SoFo / PoFo / CaFo/
Di-Penta
SoSu
Acetic Acid
Oxetanes
Natural Gas
Allylethers
MX
PIA
Benzene Brine
HMDA/IPDA
Capa
monomers
Capa polyols
Capa thermop.
Rapeseed Oil
Biodiesel
Glycerin
TDI/T80
T65
HDI/IPDI
ChlorineTDA
T100
TX
HDI DER.
OX
FX Cat
Charmor
Cyclohex.
EASAQUA
CTFDi-TMP
N-But 2-EHAL I-But
Methanol Toluene
Acetaldehyde
Caustic
FA
15
Propionic acid
3-Hydroxypropionic acid
3-Hydroxypropionaldehyde
Furan dicarboxylic acid
Butanol
PHA
Biomass
Pre-treatment
• Forestry-based
• Agricultural
residues (potato
juice, barley,
straw, etc.)
• Hydrolysis (basic,
acidic)
• Enzymatic
treatment
• Steam explosion
• Extraction
Fermentation /enzymes /
chemical transformation
Gasification of
residuals
Methacrylic acid
Acrylic acid
1,3-PDO
Furan diol
• Synthesis gas
• Biogas
Targets Challenges Activities
Sustainable industrial processes
~20 kt by 2015
Reduced carbon footprint
(>75%)
Raw material supply
Efficient pre-treatment
Process: stability, yield,
productivity
Downstream processing
New technologies
Biobutanol
VINNOVA x 2
Carbon footprint
EcoBuild
Furanics
Greenchem
PHA
Gasification
Perstorp - Chemicals from renewable feedstocks
Polyester
Acrylates
16
Choice of Conversion Technology - No Religion Some opportunities with “green” and “white” chemistries at Perstorp
CONVENTIONAL CHEMISTRY BIOCONVERSION
OF PETRO-BASED RAW
MATERIALSOF RENEWABLE
RAW MATERIALS
OF RENEWABLE RAW
MATERIALS
PROPIONIC ACID
3-HPAFURANE-BASED DIOL
BUTANOL
ETHYLENEBIODIESEL
METHANOL
SYNGAS
FUELS CHEMICALS
DIOIC ACIDS
DIOIC ACIDS
ETHANOL
ETHANOLMETHANOL
1,2-PROPANEDIOL
FURANE-BASED DIACID
OLIGOGLYCEROL
FURANE-BASED DIACID
SUCCINIC ACID
FURANE-BASED DIOL
17
Perstorp - Visionary Integration of Raw Materials and Technologies
Core competence: Applying and combining a strong
knowledge of all aspects of the chemical business
into processing of biobased raw materials, in order to
produce and market both chemicals components and
fuels of non-fossil origin
Methanol
plant
Steam
cracker
Ethanol
plant
Crushing/
refining
Synthesis
Gas unit
Oxo
aldehydes
Bio-
Methanol
plant
Polyols
Oxo
alcohols
FT-
fuels
FAME
unit
Ethanol de-
hydratisation
Biogas
Grain/sugar
Vegetable
oils
Natural gas
Fuels
Plastics
Chemicals
Perstorp SiteExternalNew Existing
18
Green Pentaerythritol as a Green Product Example Voxtar™ gives you pure performance every time
Relative cradle to grave carbon footprint comparison between
Voxtar™ M100 & M50 and Penta-fossil made
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Penta-fossil Voxtar™ M50 Voxtar™ M100
Rela
tive c
arb
on f
ootp
rint
index (
Fossile
= 1
00)
Effect on carbon footprint (cradle to grave)
when comparing Voxtar M100 & M50 with
fossile-based pentaerythritol.
-40% -63%
19
Perstorp - Why renewable raw materials?
MARKET TRENDS & SOCIAL RESPONSABILITY
Higher general awareness of the need for a sustainable society
Business opportunity / customers want to be “green”
Greenhouse effect / global warming in focus / carbon footprint
RELIABILITY & COMPETITIVENESS
Petroleum a limited resource / increasingly expensive
Secure future reliable supply of raw materials
GROWTH and PROFITABILITY SHAREHOLDER VALUE !
20
21
Perstorp Chemistry – green vs. white conversion …Relative cost for various routes to Butanol
Perstorp Chemistry – Green vs. white conversion …Relative cost for various routes to Butanol(provided stable bioethanol prices)
oxo fermentation acetaldehyde green ethylene
if
Sugar-
cane
based
if
Wheat
based
if
Oil price
80
USD/bbl
if
Oil price
160
USD/bbl
22
23
An increased oil prices will most likely lead to a corresponding increase for renewable raw materials!
24
Additional utilization of renewable raw materials will also result in a shortage, as an example for wood supply in Europe alone a shortage of more than 200 million m3 is likely to develop by 2020
European wood supply and demand; million m3 (under bark); 2020
355–370
160–170 515–540
200–260 720–800 340–420
~380
Current forest
biomass
supply
• Mobilization
• Net imports
• Recovered
wood
Estimated supply
Estimated
gap
Estimated
demand
Non-traditional
demand (energy)
Traditional
demand:
• Pulp&Paper
• Wood products
Supply Demand
BMC Management
The future price of carbon will be determined bythe consumption of Energy and Food
25
Oil /
Coal
Agricultural
Products
97 % ENERGY
3 % CHEMICALS
95 % FOOD & FEED
5 % OTHER USES (including Chemicals)
So is “Green” good by definition?
SURPRISE - SURPRICE:
• Very Complex issue …
• Need for a Holistic view …
• Changes over time …
Clearly “Green” is not always good by definition?
26
“Green” Chemicals - BioPlastics as example …Transformation of Sugar Cane into Bioethylene / Bio PE
• Global production of Ethylene: ~120 million tpa
• What would it take to convert this to “Green Ethylene”?
– Agricultural perspective:
• Only viable option: Brazilian sugar cane
• Volume corresponds to ~240 million liters of Ethanol
• Brazilian sugar cane give ~ 6000 l/ha, year
• Surface required: 40 mHa = 60 % of Brazil’s entire cropland
• Serious competitor to food production / price increases
– Financial perspective:
• Investment in Bioethylene capacity: ~ 2000 USD/ton capacity
• The volume would require a Capex of 230 bn USD (~ 50 % of the entire investment budget for the global chemical industry under 10 years)
– Market perspective:
• Massive overcapacity would be created / prices would collapse 27
Anastas & Warners - Green chemistry principles
P. T. Anastas, J. Warner, Green Chemistry Theory and Practice (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1998)
1. It is better to prevent waste than to treat or clean up waste after it is formed.2. Synthetic methods should be designed to maximize the incorporation of all
materials used in the process into the final product.3. Wherever practicable, synthetic methodologies should be designed to use and
generate substances that possess little or no toxicity to human health and the environment.
4. Chemical products should be designed to preserve efficacy of function while reducing toxicity.
5. The use of auxiliary substances (e.g., solvents, separation agents, and so forth) should be made unnecessary wherever possible and innocuous when used.
6. Energy requirements should be recognized for their environmental and economic impacts and should be minimized. Synthetic methods should be conducted at ambient temperature and pressure.
7. A raw material or feedstock should be renewable rather than depleting wherever technically and economically practicable.
8. Unnecessary derivatization (blocking group, protection/deprotection, temporary modification of physical/chemical processes) should be avoided whenever possible.
9. Catalytic reagents (as selective as possible) are superior to stoichiometric reagents.
10. Chemical products should be designed so that at the end of their function they do not persist in the environment and break down into innocuous degradation products (biodegradable).
11. Analytical methodologies need to be developed further to allow for real-time in-process monitoring and control before the formation of hazardous substances.
12. Substances and the form of a substance used in a chemical process should be chosen so as to minimize the potential for chemical accident. Including releases, explosion, and fires.
28
Presentation
29
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
30
We all tend to have our own “favorite problem”given by narrowly defined frames to reduce complexity …
In addition, our true intentions can be questioned …
31
PoliticianRe-
election?
ScientistFunding?
IndustryleaderProfit?
NGOInfluence?
Stakeholders… true intentions ?
CitizenHigher
Material Standard?Public
servantPension?
ExpertsRecognition?
32
Planet Earth is the required system definition!!!
33
2010:
6,8 bn
people
Population growth!
34
Population consumption!WWF living planet report 2010
The Living Planet Index (LPI)Reflects changes in the health of the planets ecosystems
Our present “consumption”
35
Population consumption!WWF - The Living Planet Index 2010 (LPI)Reflects changes in the health of the planets ecosystems
Worst in Class:
1. UEA (10,7)
2. Qatar (10,5)
3. Denmark (8,3)
4. Belgium (8,0)
5. USA (8,0)
6. Estonia (7,9)
7. Canada (7,0)
8. Australia (6,8)
9. Kuwait (6,3)
10. Ireland (6,3)
11. Netherlands (6,2)
12. Finland (6,1)
13. Sweden (5,9)
…74. China (2,2)
Our present “consumption” = 1,5 earths
1
Presentation
36
• Setting the Scene
• The Oil Economy
• Green Chemicals and Fuels
• The Relevant Problem
• My Conclusion
A few conclusions …• “Green Products” unfortunately more talk than impact
– Fossil based raw materials will remain competitive for many applications also with high oil prices
• Efficient and easy to use / can in many cases be the most “green” solution
• Supported by existing infrastructure / huge investments made / capital limited
– A holistic evaluation (benchmark LCA’s) would likely prove many “green products” less favorable than believed
• It is vital to compare alternative solutions / be open minded / chose the best
– Limited availability / access to renewable raw materials limits potential
• “Green Products” have a potential / they will contribute to a more sustainable world
– We need to widen the definition of “Green” / apply “Green Chemistry Principles”
• It about total resource utilization, not conversion technology or raw material used
– Good examples do exist, the most significant being Bioethanol in Brazil
– The “Greenest” product is the one never produced / save resources 37
A few more conclusions …
• Stakeholders are “using” the environment for their own purposes
– Lack of true vision , conviction and patience
• Oversimplification and narrow defined topics bring suboptimal solutions
• Speedy results overshadow true solutions
– Enormous amounts of public and corporate funding a complete waste
• Marketing and image building rather than serious efforts
– Question yourself!
38
39
Overall Challenge is a huge – a need to Manage Globally: (1) Population growth, (2) Consumption growth and (3) Fair distribution
40
1 Planet Earth!
The Conclusion
I will try to contribute / influence with
my small share by…
• questioning my / our true motives
• applying a holistic perspective
• carefully evaluating the optimal use of
resources and capital
• never giving up / keep driving forward
We all have a long way to go …