Upload
christian-sweryda
View
780
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
A brief outline showing all of the key problems with speed reduction signing in Winnipeg.
Citation preview
Speed reductions are unique for being the only locations where the "50 km/h unless otherwise
posted" rule cannot be applied. If a sign is not observed, it can be argued that you should go 50
km/h, but this doesn't apply at speed reductions due to the earlier presence of a higher (otherwise
posted) speed limit. Therefore, proper speed reduction signing is most essential. Many drivers
appear to not obey speed reductions, but only some of them are intentional violators. So the
question is, why do people not see speed reductions? In many cases, the problem is the signing
and not the drivers. When questioned about signing, the city claims on record to follow the
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) which is Canada's federal standards
manual.
MUTCD standards indicate that signs should be between 2 and 3 meters high, but Winnipeg's
signs are as low as 0.7 and as high as 4.8 meters. Signs at extreme heights are outside of a
driver's cone of vision and often go unobserved.
Height
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices Diagrams
Internal City of Winnipeg policy states that signs are to be placed no further than 3 meters back
from the curb. MUTCD standards indicate a distance of 0.3 to 2.0 meters should be used.
Winnipeg's signs are as far off the road as 11 meters and are well outside of a driver's horizontal
line of sight.
Signs are required to be reflective for drivers to observe at night. A large number of Winnipeg's
signs are not reflective and virtually invisible at night.
Horizontal Placement
Reflectivity
The single biggest problem with speed reduction signing is that Winnipeg is the only city in
Western Canada (if not Canada) that does not place speed limit signs on both sides of a divided
road or one-way street.
Dual signing is especially important because of large vehicles in the curb lane blocking sight
lines from cars in the median lane. Due to the rule of, "slower traffic keep right," the larger
vehicles are usually in the curb lane and the faster cars that are most in need of seeing the speed
reduction are in the median lane.
Winnipeg understands the issues with sight lines being blocked because almost every other type
of sign can be found dual signed throughout the city.
Dual Signing
Many signs are also missing or hidden behind trees and other obstructions.
Other cities follow MUTCD standards when placing speed limit signs. Signs are not too high or
too far off the road and are fully reflective. Dual signing is very common in other cities.
Other Problems
Outside Winnipeg
Saskatoon Regina
Calgary Vancouver
Police and photo enforcement largely profit from Winnipeg's signing deficiencies. The "50
unless otherwise" posted rule cannot be applied to speed reductions meaning the drivers being
preyed upon are following the proper driving rules. Many photo radar locations and Winnipeg's
top three producing intersection cameras are all located after speed reductions where the signing
is not MUTCD compliant. Most of the common police speed traps are after speed reductions of
which none are dual signed and most do not comply with placement criteria. Dugald/Plessis,
Kenaston/Carpathia, Roblin/Chalfont and McPhillips/Storie are examples.
The speed reduction sign on Grant Ave was placed well above the 3 meter maximum height and
was preceding Winnipeg's highest producing intersection camera. This issue was covered by
local media which eventually led to the sign being lowered to proper height in May 2012.
After the sign was moved, the effects were immediately felt by the camera. The number of fines
issued for July-Sept 2012 (the first full recording period after the sign was lowered) was 29% of
the numbers recorded for the same period in 2011. The Oct-Dec 2012 stats were even lower
with the camera only issuing 26% of what was recorded in 2011. Needless to say, this is no
longer the city's highest producing speed camera. This shows the effect that properly placed
signs have on speeding and proves the need to fix other signs around the city.
Police and Photo Enforcement Locations
Grant Ave Example
Before After
During the spring of 2011, the speed reduction sign on Brookside Blvd south of the Perimeter
fell over and remained lying in the ditch. During the sign's absence, police conducted daily
speed traps along Brookside Blvd. Public Works were asked to replace the sign, but instead
claimed that they were too busy working on the new Chief Peguis Trail to replace existing signs.
Even though these were City of Winnipeg signs, in Sept 2011, a request was made to the
province for the Highways Dept to install the missing signs. In October, the province installed
larger sized speed reduction signs on both sides of the road. Both are measures never used by
the City of Winnipeg. Once the signs were installed, they were so effective that police speed
traps disappeared and have never been seen there since.
Brookside Blvd Example
Before - Spring 2011 Before - Fall 2011
After - October 2011