35
What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes & secondary prevention ? Ron Peters Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands

What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

What is the position of NOACs in

acute coronary syndromes amp

secondary prevention

Ron Peters

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam

the Netherlands

Part 1

Coronary disease

no other indication

for anticoagulant therapy

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Months after hospital discharge

S

urv

ivin

g

STEMI Non-STEMI UA

Survival Rate 6 Months Post Discharge for

STEMI NSTEMI and UA Patients

Goldberg RJ et alAm J Cardiol 200493288-93

OASIS 5 follow-up

N Engl J Med 2006 3541464-1476

N Engl J Med 2002347969-9

Composite of death reinfarction and stroke

10

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 2: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Part 1

Coronary disease

no other indication

for anticoagulant therapy

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Months after hospital discharge

S

urv

ivin

g

STEMI Non-STEMI UA

Survival Rate 6 Months Post Discharge for

STEMI NSTEMI and UA Patients

Goldberg RJ et alAm J Cardiol 200493288-93

OASIS 5 follow-up

N Engl J Med 2006 3541464-1476

N Engl J Med 2002347969-9

Composite of death reinfarction and stroke

10

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 3: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Months after hospital discharge

S

urv

ivin

g

STEMI Non-STEMI UA

Survival Rate 6 Months Post Discharge for

STEMI NSTEMI and UA Patients

Goldberg RJ et alAm J Cardiol 200493288-93

OASIS 5 follow-up

N Engl J Med 2006 3541464-1476

N Engl J Med 2002347969-9

Composite of death reinfarction and stroke

10

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 4: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

OASIS 5 follow-up

N Engl J Med 2006 3541464-1476

N Engl J Med 2002347969-9

Composite of death reinfarction and stroke

10

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 5: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

N Engl J Med 2002347969-9

Composite of death reinfarction and stroke

10

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 6: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Circulation 2002Feb 5105(5)557-63

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 7: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Haq et al Am J Med 2010123250-258

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 8: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Sorensen R et al Lancet 2009374 1967-1974

bull During a mean follow-up of 476middot5 days 4middot6 patients were admitted to hospital with bleeding

bull The yearly incidence of bleeding varied from 2middot6 for the aspirin group to 12middot0 for triple therapy

bull Number needed to harm was12middot5 for triple therapy

bull Of 1852 patients with non-fatal bleeding (37middot9) had recurrent MI or died during the study period

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 9: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 10: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

n=7400

Recent ACS + 2 high risk features

apixaban 5 mg BID (or 25 if ecclt40)

19 single APT 81 DAPT

Mortality in placebo 39 in 15 months

(hazard ratio with apixaban 259

95 CI 150 to 446)

HR095 (080 to 111)

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 11: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

n=15500 Recent ACS

If lt 55 years previous MI or DM

Rivaroxaban 25 or 5 mg BID

7 single APT 93 DAPT

Mortality in placebo arm 107 in 2y

HR 396 (246ndash638)

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 12: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Meta-analysis efficacy

all cause mortality MI and stroke

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

NNT (benefit) on top of DAPT 187

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 13: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Oldgren J et al Eur Heart J 2013341670-1680

Meta-analysis safety

major bleeding

NNT (harm) on top of DAPT 24

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 14: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

What about dose

apixaban in APPRAISE 2 same dose as in afib (5mg BID)

rivaroxaban in ATLAS ACS2 frac14 and frac12 the dose used in afib

(25 and 5 mg vs 10 mg)

unexpectedly

Increase in bleeding similar with both agents

Lower dose rivaroxaban appears more effective than full dose

apixaban

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 15: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

What about newer P2Y12 inhibitors

Replacing clopidogrel with ticagrelor (or prasugrel)

may be a better option than adding an OAC to ASA plus

clopidogrel

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 16: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

ASA + ticagrelor (PLATO)

vs

low dose rivaroxaban +ASA + clopidogrel (ATLAS ACS2-TIMI51)

PLATO ATLAS ACS2

Age (years) 62 62

PCI 61 60

nonSTE-ACS 60 50

Rubboli et al

Intern Emerg Med

20138672-680

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 17: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

individuals at high risk

of thrombotic complications example

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 18: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

At Discharge Risk Model

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 19: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

6 month mortality after ACS

Validity of the GRACE ACS prediction model in an independent data set

P J Bradshaw D T Ko A M Newman and L R DonovanHeart 2006 Jul 92(7) 905ndash909

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 20: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey)

Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 21: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

TNT and IDEAL trials

atorvastatin 80 mg vs low dose statin

Overall treatment effect RR 078

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 22: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Part 2

coronary artery disease in

patients with atrial fibrillation

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 23: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

At Discharge Risk Model

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 24: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Pisters R Lane DA Nieuwlaat R et al (the Euro Heart Survey) Chest 2010138(5)1093-100

Lip GY Frison L Halperin JL Lane DA J Am Coll Cardiol 201157(2)173-80

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 25: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Selected recommendations

In ACS adding OAC to DAPT doubles the risk of bleeding

In ACS risk stratify with GRACE score

Long term re-assess CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED annually

In combination with antiplatelet therapy consider lower dose of OAC

In combinations with OAC prefer clopidogrel over newer P2Y12 inhibitors (bleeding risk)

In general continue existing OAC if ACS occurs

Minimize duration of combination therapy

Long term continue OAC in all patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ge2

Very selected cases long term combination with antiplatelet agent

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 26: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Lancet 2013Volume 381 No 9872 p1107ndash1115

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 27: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Measures to reduce the risk of bleeding

Low dose aspirin

Clopidogrel preferred second antiplatelet agent

INR 20 ndash 25

INR in TTR gt 70

Radial approach in PCI

Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorterduration combined therapy)

Avoid routine use of GP2b3a inhibitors

Consider PPI in OAC + antiplatelet therapy

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 28: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

Eur Heart J 2014353155-3179

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended

Page 29: What is the position of NOACs in acute coronary syndromes ......INR in TTR > 70% Radial approach in PCI Bare metal stents or new generation drug eluting stents (shorter duration combined

conclusions

CAD high risk of recurrent events

No clear evidence of benefit of adding OAC to antiplatelet Rx

clear evidence of increased bleeding risk with adding OAC toantiplatelet Rx

Adding newer P2Y12 antagonists to ASA may be superior to addingOAC to ASA + clopidogrel

Individualization of benefits and bleeding risk is recommended

Please use professional organisation resources (ESC AHAACC) forguidance and local protocols

Explicit documentation and repeated re-assessment is recommended