Upload
malakai-wilbur
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What is an IDE? Is Clinical Data Conducted Outside the U.S. Acceptable?
Carole C. Carey, BSEE, [email protected], International StaffUS Food and Drug Administration (USFDA)Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Learning Objectives
To gain an understanding of the Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) regulations.
The purpose of the IDE regulation The major regulatory elements that constitute
medical device Good Clinical Practices Significant Risk and Non-Significant Risk
Studies FDA review criteria Clinical trials outside U.S. and FDA jurisdiction
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
What is an IDE?
Investigational Device Exemption
To encourage discovery and development of useful medical devices for human use,
to the extent consistent with the protection of the public health and safety and with ethical standards,
while maintaining optimum freedom for scientific investigators in their pursuit of that purpose.
Allows the use of unapproved devices.
statutory authority, FDCA, Section 520(g)21 CFR Part 812
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Definitionsa PREMARKET deviceInvestigational
Device Is still in the
developmental stage Is not considered to
be in commercial distribution
The object of a clinical investigation is to determine safety and effectiveness
a MARKETED device
Investigational Use Clinical evaluation of
an already legally marketed device for a new intended use
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Applicable Regulations (Medical Device Good Clinical Practices)
21 CFR Part 812: Investigational Device Exemptions
covers the procedures for the conduct of clinical studies with medical devices including application, responsibilities of sponsors and investigators, labeling, records, and reports.
21 CFR Part 50: Informed Consent, Human Subject Protections
Section 50.25 -- elements of IC Section 50.23 -- IC waiver (emergency) Section 50.24 -- IC waiver (emergency research)
21 CFR Part 56: Institutional Review Boards covers the procedures and responsibilities for institutional review boards (IRBs) that approve clinical investigations protocols
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Applicable Regulations- cont’d (Medical Device Good Clinical Practices)
21 CFR 54, Financial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators,
covers the disclosure of financial compensation to clinical
investigators which is part of FDA’s assessment of the
reliability of the clinical data.
21 CFR 820 Subpart C,
Design Controls of the Quality System Regulation,
provides the requirement for procedures to control the
design of the device in order to ensure that the specified
design requirements are met.
IDEs are exempt from GMP/QSR (except Design Controls)
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
When is an IDE application required?
Research in human subjects conducted in the United States: To support device marketing application: PMA, HDE or
510(k)
To collect safety and effectiveness information (e.g., for a new intended use of a legally marketed device)
Unapproved devices or new intended use of approved device (even if no marketing application planned) by sponsor-investigator.
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
8
The Regulatory Path
510k PMA
IDE
!!! MARKET !!!
October 7, 2009
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Valid Scientific Evidence Comes from…
Well-controlled investigationsWell-controlled investigations Partially-controlled investigationsPartially-controlled investigations Studies & objective trials without matched controlsStudies & objective trials without matched controls Well-documented case histories conducted by Well-documented case histories conducted by
qualified expertsqualified experts Reports of significant human experience with a Reports of significant human experience with a
marketed devicemarketed device Valid scientific evidence is NOT…
Isolated case reportsIsolated case reports Random experienceRandom experience Unsubstantiated opinions (e.g., testimonials)Unsubstantiated opinions (e.g., testimonials)
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Required Elements of an IDE
U.S. Sponsor (manufacturer or investigator) Prior Investigations Investigational Plan Manufacturing Information Investigator and IRB Information Labeling Informed Consent Sales Information
“CAUTION - Investigational device. Limited by Federal (or United States) Law to investigational use.”
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Investigational Plan
Purpose Name and intended use of device Objectives and duration of study
Written Protocol & Analysis Methodology and an analysis demonstrating scientific
soundness Number of patients and sites Inclusion and exclusion criteria Statistical methods Case Report Forms
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Investigational Plan (cont’d)
Risk Analysis Description of all risks Justification for investigation
Description of the Device Each important component Principle of operation Copies of all labeling
Monitoring Procedures Monitor to oversee progress of investigtion
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Endpoints: Outcome Variables
Parameters that determine study success: Primary Effectiveness: The most clinically
relevant parameters addressed by the clinical trial question
Safety Assessment: What are the expected & unexpected unfavorable outcomes & how can they be avoided?
Secondary effectiveness endpoints: Other parameters that support study success
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Strategies: Clinical Considerations
For CDRH: US studies must be conducted in compliance
with the IDE regulations (21 CFR Part 812) Proper Informed Consent (21 CFR Part 50)Proper Informed Consent (21 CFR Part 50) IRB Regulations (21 CFR Part 56)IRB Regulations (21 CFR Part 56) Adequate monitoringAdequate monitoring
Dependent upon the data present & device characteristics, feasibility study often necessary prior to pivotal study Support proof of conceptSupport proof of concept Assist with refining inclusion/exclusion criteriaAssist with refining inclusion/exclusion criteria Refine surgical techniqueRefine surgical technique Recommendation of pilot study with control groupRecommendation of pilot study with control group
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Significant Risk Study is…a study that presents a
potential serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject An implant for use in supporting or
sustaining human life for a use of substantial
importance in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease or otherwise preventing impairment of human health
FDA and IRB Approval is required
Cardiac catheters Surgical tissue
adhesives Vascular and arterial
graft protheses Dental endosseous
implants Cochlear implants Implantable infusion
pumps Implantable
pacemaker
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Non-significant Risk Study
Do not pose significant risk to research subjects
Sponsor presents protocol to IRB and a statement why investigation does not pose significant risk
If IRB approves the investigation as NSR, it can begin.
No IDE submission requirement to the FDA
Abbreviated IDE
Daily wear contact lenses
Glucose monitor Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) Pulse oximeter Ob/Gyn diagnostic
ultrasound
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Abbreviated IDE
No formal FDA approval is needed
IRB is required to meet all aspects of:
21 CFR Part 50 (protection of human subjects)
21 CFR Part 56 (IRB)
Labeling requirements
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Studies Exempt from Part 812
Preamendments (pre-1976) devices
510(k)-cleared and HDE- or PMA-approved devices, If used in accordance with approved label
In vitro diagnostic devices (most)
Consumer preference testing of marketed devices
Combinations of legally marketed devices
Custom devices (are narrowly defined)
Studies outside the US: Declaration of Helsinki
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Approved IDEs are Exempt from…
Registration Performance
Standards 510(k) regs PMA regs Misbranding regs
GMPs (except Design Controls)
Color Additive requirements Banned Devices regs Restricted Device
requirements
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Approved IDEs are NOT Exempt from…
Adulteration regs Labeling regs Prohibition on: promotion/marketing,
commercialization, prolonging the investigation, representing the device as safe and effective
Import/Export Regs
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Program
To ensure the quality and integrity of data and information submitted in support of research and marketing permits that include IDE, PMA, and 510(k) submissions, and
To ensure that human subjects taking part in investigations are protected from undue hazard or risk.
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Differing levels of regulatory control depending on the level of risk
Full Requirem ents
SR Investigations
A bbreviated R equirem ents
N SR Studies
Studies Subjectto IDE Regulation
Studies Exem pt fromthe IDE Regulation
All Device Investigations
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
FDA Review Criteria Scientifically sound Reasonably believed to be able to
provide the desired results Data from non-clinical studies support
the proposed human research Research conducted by qualified
investigators
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
FDA Review Criteria (cont’d) Expected benefit outweigh any expected
risks Research subjects fully informed to the
risks involved in the research, understand these risks and freely volunteer to participate
IRB approval of the research
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
FDA Review Times and Decision
FDA review time for IDE is 30 days.
Within 30 days, FDA will approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove an IDE application.
For disapproved IDE, the sponsor can respond to the deficiencies and/or request hearing.
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Clinical Trials Outside U.S. (OUS)
“Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies: Guidance for Industry - Acceptance of Foreign Clinical Studies”, March 2001
FDA will accept a foreign clinical device study only if the study conforms to the ethical principles of the Declaration or with the laws and regulations of the country, whichever provides greater protection of the human subjects.
Subject to Human Subject Research Protections laws applicable in that country
Studies performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Same scientific and data integrity standards
FDA does not have legal authority/jurisdiction outside of the United States
But FDA has authority to set conditions for accepting non-U.S. data that is used to support marketing (PMA, 510(k), HDE, etc.) in the U.S.
Once accepted for review, the same scientific and data integrity standards are applied as for studies conducted in the U.S.
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Early Consultation with FDA If intended to support eventual marketing
application in US, should: Reflect US medical practice patternsReflect US medical practice patterns Reflect US patient populationReflect US patient population Ensure adequate documentation of good Ensure adequate documentation of good
study conduct, availability of raw data study conduct, availability of raw data
Therefore: It is beneficial to consult with FDA (e.g., Pre-IDE) on clinical protocol beforehand if intended to support US marketing application
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
FDA Jurisdiction FDA has jurisdiction over the export of unapproved
devices exported for use in foreign studies.
FDA does not have jurisdiction over the manner in which the investigational study is conducted outside the U.S.
An IDE is not necessary for a study conducted entirely at foreign sites.
FDA has authority to accept or deny data that has been collected during a study at a foreign site that is submitted to support a research or marketing application.
2009 Sep 29 Edmonton 2009 Oct 1 Vancouver
FDA Regulatory Framework and Medical Device Workshop
Summary All clinical investigations subject to the
regulation must be approved before they can begin.
All subjects in the investigation must give informed consent – human subject protection.
The basics of good clinical studies and good
clinical practices are the same worldwide.