What have we achieved in Lisbon

7/30/2019 What have we achieved in Lisbon

1/19


2/19

take ownership of C lea ring Partic ipa tion

become a group

sha re on W HAT we do (desc ribe the p rac tic es that w e a reinvo lved in),

Sta rting thinking about HO W we d o it (Method olog ies)


3/19

Foc us on ourselves as ac to rs involved ind ifferent pa rtic ipa tory proc esses.

Observe an experienc e tha t has beenpresented as a study case

Create the right sp irit and motiva tionamong the partic ipants in order to workon the virtua l p la tform.


4/19

PRESENTATIONS

of the fac ilita tors

of the p artic ipants

of the projec t (previous experienc es)

Ana lyse the logo of the projec t, identitythe key words and ob jec tives.


5/19


6/19

Ke y w o rd s G o a ls

People

Diversity

Growth

Citizenship

Network

Foundations

Susta inab ility

Impacts

Tog ethe r

Multiply

Transforma tion

Circle

Digital

Dynamic

Ca pa c ity building/

empowerment

Resources deve lop ment

Que stioning and transforming

democracy

Lobb ying and advoc ac y

RedAntenna

Up, d own, around

Tree

Antenna

ConcentricBalance

Expansion

Opacity

Lea rn ab out c onc reteexperienc es, ca se stud ies

and key elements;

Foundations of participation

and m ethodology;

Interdisc ip lina ry - to lea rn

throug h the experienc e of

othe rs; To c rea te a netw ork;

To c rea te our on way to do .

ParticipationRaising awareness

Growth

Networks

Direc t d emoc rac y

Collec tive proce dures

Excha nge e xperienc e on aloc al level

Conc ep tualize on the term o f

pa rtic ipa tory dem oc rac y

Undertaking initiatives at

loc al and regional level


7/19


8/19


9/19


10/19

Prec ip ita tion, ove r thinking, too ma ny op inions, c onc ern about (foc uson) my opinion.

W ha t he lp e d W ha t d id nt he lp

CollectiveapproachAttention to

d ifferent profilesTrustAdaptationCooperationResponsibilityPartic ipa tion vs.effectiveness

(big g roup vs.sma ll group )Organiza tion +representationPlanWin-win

NegotiationConditionsSupport

Proc essCommunicationLearningSafeenvironmentEquity/ b alanc eInitiative

Time , threa t, opposition, risk, stress,c ha llenge, rules.


11/19


12/19

Fa c ilita to rs O b sta c le s

W el l def ined goals

ListenTrust

Resources

Team w ork

Enough t ime

Sharing

Open to env i ronmental s t imul iMo t i va t i on

Freedom

Pleasure

Balance

Lack of t im e

Fear (fai lure, acceptance, etc)No instruct ion

Individual issues

Find a grou p

Personal needs/ worr ies/ dreams

Sense of belong

Confrontat ion/ conf l ic t

Sel f /etero conscience

Crit ical th ink ing/ d i f feren t

prof i les

Negot iat ion

Adaptat ion

Time

Di f ferent prof i les

Insecurity

Lack of comm unicat ion

O utGood communicat ion

Empathy

Active l istening

To share a code

Accessibil i ty to physical

i n fo rmat i on

M eans to part ic ipate and tools

Accessibil i ty

Short process

Feedback

Possib i li ty to interact and changethe plan

InM otivat ion and sense of responsib i li ty in

the subject

Self confidence

Education

InOu t

Scale and t im e As potent ia l fac i l ita tor or obstac le

Both p ossib le fac i l ita tors or o bstac les

Compromise

Communicat ion

N e t w o r k

Engagement

Feel ing that you can make i t

The di f ference

Distance

Time

Resources

Share values and goals

Plan Transparency


13/19

Wha t m a ke s it go w rong?

Wha ts inte rna l/ inhe re nt vs. ex te rna l?

Pa rtic ipa tive m e thodo log y m a ybe e n fo rc ing (no t fre e )

The sha p e is not im p orta nt

Sho rt or lon g te rm p roc e sse s?

C risis/ inse c urity a s ob sta c le or op p o rtunity?

Do d iffe re nt prof ile s m a ke c ol le c tive b uild ing im p ossib le ?

How to ge ne ra te trust be tw e e n wha t is d i ffe re nt im p orta nc e o f

ind iv id ua l w ork d uring p a rtic ip a tory p roc e ss.

How re la tio ns of trust a nd p ow e r a re b uilt in the p roc e ss?


14/19

Fa c ts, se nsa tio ns, inte rp re ta tion

Understand t he ru les

We so lved prob lem s

Deciding on a strategy

Anticipat ing chal lenges

Roles distr ib ut ion

Leader choice f i rst (drop ped aft er)

Spont aneou s leadership

No visua l comm unicat ion/ cou ldn t par t ic ipate (a l l)

Breaking the rules and be aware of i t

I t s easiest t o give th e answer

How st r ict are the r u les we have?

What possible scenarios

Decis ion on w ho w i l l go to the faci l ita tor

Dif ferent levels of having ini t iat iveNot enthusiast ic

Group B as par t ic ipants o f group A

Rely on percept ion o f 1 p erson

Not happy abou t carry ing 4 persons

Impact o f th e leader

M ore cohesion a f ter so lv ing th ings together

M ore energy w hen the group is un ited

Bet te r comm un ica t ion (more and m ore )

Strategy organizat ion, clari fying/ forming, fusion

(product ion)

High level of part icipat ion

Easy f low of com m unicat ion

4 more engaged, mo re expect ing what m ay com e

Satisfact ion because of task accom plishment

Focus on the o utcom e

I wanted to be a par t o f the group

If I foun d th e I should solve i t

Com m on Know ledge of the ru les

Cooperat ion w i th in group ANo team wo rk w i th in group B because of focus on task

and other group

W hat fo r to do th i s

T im e is im portant ( looking for a so lu t ion) .


15/19


16/19

Presenta tion of the stud y c ase (Felix)

Partic ipants in g roups elabora te thequestions in o rder to esta b lish a d ia logue with the experienc e. WHO, INWHAT, FOR WHAT, HOW.

Susana : CLEAR model

Luc rec ia pp t


17/19

Elem ents that cam e ou t f rom part icipants pract ices (how )W ho W h o n o t ?

People who are interested

Peop le w ho can cont r ibu te

Context

Relat ions between whos

Roles of him/ her: Prom oter?

Gender/ age/ organizat ions (quant i tat ive data)

H ow Organizat ion of t he process + pow erExpress = Listen (abil i ty, motivat ion, open act)

Tools and m etho d (adapt , appro priated, accessibi l ity;

comfor tab le )

Cul ture

E m p o we rm e n t

Facil i tatorRules

Ambient

Transparency

Feedback about resul ts

Time

W h a t fo r To change, improve at t i t udes, comm uni t y

Impact

To protect

Transform ideasPromote va lues (?) to change the w ay you perce ive the

wo r l d

To enable peop le to take part o f

To conf ro nt visions and need s

To channel / organize m ot ivat ions

To change o r affect lo cal social policies;To get access to inform at ion

To create sense of belonging (be part of)

I n w h a tpeoplepartic ipate

In it ial p hase Iden t if ies t he prob lemComm on rules/ goals visionDecision process

Planning phase

Priorit ies decision

Implementa t ion - mon i to r ing (act ion)

Evaluat ion/ fo l low up

Other ideas Relevant to p eople;

How o pen (f lexible);

Scale, context, external factors.


18/19

Summarising the ob jec tives of the projec t andidentific a tion of the key elements: next sem ina r inBarc elona , in April. Work on the virtua l Pla tform inorder to sha re the how of our p rac tic es, c rea te

group s of c ollaborative work, and identify the top icsof interest in order to p lan the next sem ina r.

Presenta tion of the a c tua l situa tion of the p la tform.

Disc ussion in orde r to adapt the p la tform to the

need s of the p rojec t a nd the p a rtic ipants. Crea te a c ommo n ca lendar for the follow ing

ac tivities until the next semina r.


19/19

Documents

What have we achieved in Lisbon