Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
WGNE 27 High Resolution Modeling
Compiled by Bill Lapenta & Gary Dietachmayer
Thanks to WGNE Members for the contributions
Model Configuration
• Main deterministic UK models: • Global 25km (DA) –
• North Atlantic and Europe 12km (DA) to 48 hours
• UK 4km and 1.5km (DA) to 36 hours
• New 4km downscaler model - Runs reconfiguring from Global analysis and driven directly by (3 hourly) global LBCs to 5 days
• To provide weather detail at longer range (e.g. shower advection)
• Improved performance over UK4 for some metrics – benefits of simpler nesting / up-to-date LBCs outweigh loss of benefits of DA
Temperature/Wind (mean rms errors: 17th March-10th Sept)
Surface Temperature and Wind
Temperature (VT 3,9,15,21z) Wind (VT 3,9,15,21z)
Temperature (VT 0,6,12,18z) Wind (VT 0,6,12,18z)
UK4
UK4X
Experimental 1.5km system • Aim for system capable of using
radar data • 3dVAR (3 hourly initially) • Latent Heat nudging • Doppler winds
• Best coverage is over Eastern NSW (Sydney Domain)
• Main foci so far • Radar & QPE quality control • Doppler (clear air) wind QC • Assessing model performance • Configuring 3dVAR and Latent Heat
Nudging (ongoing)
4
• Address model issues • Still have issues with excessive vertical
velocities • Resolution does matter! Model & DA
• Still hopeful for operational 1.5km assimilation of tropical convection
• Brisbane & Darwin provide useful data sets
• Includes ARM site
• Explore other cases • Severe storms in Melbourne and Sydney
• Model better behaved
• Objective verification • Rainval, Rainval-hourly, blob-based
motion verification
Area & Volume vs Rainfall Rate
• 1.5km – too much convection & too strong • 4,5 & 6 hour forecasts • Model calibration • 3dVAR small effect • Latent Heat Nudging needs calibration
• 0.05o (5km) & 0.11o (12km) problems with heavy precipitation too
• 3,4,5,….,14 hour forecasts • Little sensitivity to forecast length • APS0 5km delivers lot of rain at low rate,
and has odd peak at 100 mm/hour
Obs 3dVAR+LHN 3dVAR only
Obs 3dVAR+LHN 0.05o (FC only) 0.11o 4dVAR
mm/hour
5
Observed (Radar + Gauge) 1.5km 3dVAR 1.5km 3dVAR + LHN
Problem with latent heat nudging when “adding” convection
Latent heat nudging worked better when “removing” convection
Examples of 3dVAR and Latent Heat Nudging at 1.5km
Hourly Accumulated Precipitation Ending 08 UTC 10 Jan 2011
Overview high resolution modeling activities in CMA�
• Motivation – To implement a 3-km resolution operational NWP system
covered the whole China in the next 2 or 3 years
• Upgrade activities of GRAPES_Meso – Improve the model dynamic core: high-accuracy advection scheme; 4th order
horizontal diffusion with orographic flux limiting – Two-moment microphysics scheme development – GPS/PW assimilation – Radar radial wind & reflectivity assimilation – AWS assimilation – Cloud analysis
• Current status – Test system in Guangzhou Meteorological Bureau�
7
Main features of high resolution GRAPES_Meso�
• Model Non-hydrostatic Arakawa C-grid & terrain-following
Z 2-time-level SISL, but piecewise
Rational Method for scalar advection Raymond filter to remove the
unresolved topo. & mitigate the steepness
4th-order horizontal diffusion with orographic flux limiting
Physics package RRTM LW & Dudhia SW Two-moment microphysics NOAH land surface YSU nonlocal PBL
• 3D-VAR Model grid space incremental
analysis GTS, local radio sonde,
Doppler radar VAD, AWS, GPS/PW, FY-2C/2D cloud drift wind, Doppler radar radial wind & reflectivity
Cloud analysis based on radar reflectivity
8
Model Domain �
9
10
NCEP 1.33 km Resolution within 4km CONUS NAM nest
Application to Hurricane Irene over the Bahamas
12 UTC 24 Aug to 00 UTC 26 Aug MSLP (mb) 10m wind 1h precip (in)
NCEP 1.33 km Resolution within 4km CONUS NAM nest
Application to Hurricane Irene over the Bahamas
12 UTC 24 Aug to 00 UTC 26 Aug 10m wind Simulated reflectivity
GME Δx = 30/20 km
COSMO-RU7 Δx = 7 km
COSMO-RU2 Δx =2.2 km Domain: 900 km * 1000 km Grid: 420*470 * 50 Step: 2.2 км Time step: 15 сек Forecast: 24 час. Cores: 400
Grid: 368 642 * 60 Step: 30 / 20 км Time step: 110 сек Forecast: 7 суток
Гидрометеорологический центр Российской Федерации
COSMO-RUsib Δx =14 km
DWD (Germany) global model GME: initial and boundary data
Domain: 4900 km * 4340 km Grid: 700*620 * 40 Step: 7 км Time step: 40 сек Forecast: 78 час. Cores: 800
Domain: 5000 km * 3500 km Grid: 360*250 * 40 Step: 14 км Time step: 80 сек Forecast: 78 час. Cores: 48.
12 11/7/11 Rivin Gdaly, HMC of Russia
13
" Initial and boundary data: 00,06,12 and 18 UTC, GME (DWD)
" Forecast: 24 h " Grid step 2.2 km " Grid:
420 * 470 * 50 (Moscow) 420 * 470 * 50 (Sochi)
" SGI Al'x 4700 (1664 cores) (832 processors Itanium 2, 3,3 Tb memory)
" Run time for 24 h. 27 min: 400 cores
Гидрометеорологический центр Российской Федерации
COSMO-RU02: domain, time of run with MPI
13
COSMO-‐RU2, 12-‐23 February 2011, T2m (prepared by A. Bundel & Versus2,
Krasnaya Polyana & Sochi ,)
14
ECMWF 2011 Slide 15
Plans for next two years
Experimentation with a fast Legendre transform
Experimentation towards a future operational implementation of T2047 (~10km)
Global case studies at T3999 (~5km) and T7999 (~2.5km) resolution.
Increased vertical resolution to 137 levels
Further testing of the (moist) non-hydrostatic IFS model formulation and evaluation of various efficiency gains.
Improving the conservation of tracers and cloud species.
Further extend the applicability of the IFS model towards cloud resolving scales.
Simulation of deep convective systems on the small planet
IFS NH dynamics coupled with the prognostic microphysics of the current cycle is used to simulate deep convective systems on a small planet at resolutions where explicit convection is permitted by the dynamics (Δx<3 km). Idealized test cases (Weisman and Klemp, 1982, 1984) are qualitatively well reproduced by the IFS
Without parametrized convection the IFS results are quite sensitive to the numerics and to the tuning of the microphysics. The results suggest limits to the applicability of the existing convection scheme for resolutions 5 km< Δx <9 km.
BACKUP SLIDES
© Crown copyright Met Office
Plan to routinely run a 2.2 km ensemble from 2012 (MOGREPS-UK), embedded within MOGREPS-R (EU) (18 km -> 12 km) ensemble.
Convective-scale Ensemble
Nigel Roberts
36-hour forecasts 12 members 6-hour cycling Downscaling – No high-resolution initial perturbations or forecast perturbations to start with Case study experiments 24 members 1.5 & 2.2 km
© Crown copyright Met Office
Morpeth flood event 5-6 Sept 2008 Probability of exceeding 50mm in 17 hours
UKV 24 members 2.2km 24 members
Neighbourhood 13.5 x 13.5 km (3x4.5km pixels)
© Crown copyright Met Office
Comparison of ensemble sizes and resolution
Agreement (using Fractions skill score) between smaller and degraded resolution ensembles and full 24 member 1.5km ensemble
On-going development of Arome ensemble prediction system
Downscaling of global Ensemble Prediction System
Mesoscale Ensemble prediction system, first trials
Probability of reaching 50mm threshold for 24-hour precip.
Obs reaching 50mm = red squares 21
22
COSMO-DE- Ensemble Prediction system
Susanne Theis, Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
since 9 Dec. 2010 the pre-operational phase has started (20 members)
motivation: simulations with a convection-permitting model (COSMO-DE with 2.8 km horizontal grid size) have a strong non-deterministic behaviour use an EPS to asess the model uncertainties
23
Probability Maps
+ 13h + 10h
+ 7h probability of snow > 5cm
produced by ensemble
Current status of Arome at Météo-France
Operational since december 2008
grid : 2.5km
60 levels up to 1hPa
3D-Var every 3 hours
Coupled to global model Arpege
Assimilation of conventional, satellite and radar (radial winds and reflectivities)
Reflectivity observations
In 2014,
resolution will increase from 2.5 km to 1.3km,
From 60 to around 90 levels
Over the Alps, example of resolution change
More levels in lower
troposphere