14
Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian Dembski Amsterdam, 7 September 2012

Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

Westflank HaarlemmermeerLegal norms versus project architecture

Sebastian Dembski Amsterdam, 7 September 2012

Page 2: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

2

•Amsterdam Metropolitan Area

IJ Lake

Amsterdam

Haarlem Almere

Schiphol

Utrecht

Page 3: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

3

•Westflank Haarlemmermeer

Page 4: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

4

•Integral Approach1. Housing (10,000 units; 1,000 high density 60-65/ha,

the rest low density 10-35/ha; 30/70 social/market)

2. Water Management

■ 2m cubic metre seasonal storage

■ 1m cubic metre peak storage

3. Green development

■ 900ha

■ Park 21 (Haarlemmermeer)

4. Public Transport (Express Bus) (City-Region A’dam)

5. Sustainability

Page 5: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

5

•Actors1. Project Partners

■ Province of North-Holland (lead partner)

■ Municipality of Haarlemmermeer

■ National Real Estate & Development Corporation (RVOB) on behalf of National Government

■ Water Board Rijnland2. Other actors

■ Ministry of Economic Affairs (EL&I)

■ Schiphol Airport

■ …

Page 6: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

6

•Framework1. Studie

■Onderwerp

■Onderwerp

2. Studie

■Onderwerp

Page 7: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

7

•Twee studies

1. Studie

■Onderwerp

■Onderwerp

2. Studie

■Onderwerp

Page 8: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

8

•Haarlemmer Lake (1850)1. Studie

■Onderwerp

■Onderwerp

2. Studie

■Onderwerp

Page 9: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

9

•Water Problems1. Studie

■Onderwerp

■Onderwerp

2. Studie

■Onderwerp

Page 10: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

10

•Housing Shortage1. Studie

■Onderwerp

■Onderwerp

2. Studie

■Onderwerp

Page 11: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

11

•Key Factor Schiphol Airport 1947 1955

1961

1985 2003

2008

Page 12: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

12

•380kV Power Line1. Air Traffic Safety

■LIB

2. Nota Ruimte

■20Ke contour

3. High Voltage Power Lines

■SEV II

■Wro

Page 13: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

13

•Limit(ation)s1. Air Traffic Safety

■LIB

2. Nota Ruimte

■20Ke contour

3. High Voltage Power Lines

■SEV II

■Wro

Page 14: Westflank Haarlemmermeer Legal norms versus project architecture Sebastian DembskiAmsterdam, 7 September 2012

14

•Working Hypotheses1. Regulation is so limiting, that the slightest change in the

project conditions makes it impossible to achieve the policy objectives.

2. Rather than looking at regulations, we can look at interaction (governance). Has the national government be involved sufficiently and made a problem owner of the Westflank project? Is it a problem of negotiation?

3. The practice of development projects in the Netherlands with organisational and financial integration is strength and weakness at the same time.