Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 0 0
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being in India: disparity and surprises across districts
March 2013
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
© COPYRIGHT, Tata Strategic Management Group, 2010. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be circulated,
quoted, or reproduced for distribution. The contents of this document are the intellectual property of Tata Strategic Management
Group. These may not be used without prior written permission of Tata Strategic Management Group.
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 1 1
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Quality of Life – Definition by Prof. Joseph Stiglitz
Quality of Life:
“It is a broader concept than economic production and living
standards which includes the full range of factors that influences what we
value in living, reaching beyond its material side.”
- Prof. Joseph Stiglitz, Commission on Measurement
of Economic & Social Progress - 2009
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 2 2
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Quality of Life & Well Being : Indian context
Well being, in the Indian context needs to consider a range of
indicators representing material and social factors
Essential to look at a smaller geographical unit say, a district, instead
of a typical state
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 3 3
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
8 different categories were carefully selected to form the index on the basis of
their ability to explain the well being of households
Category Description
Home amenities Type of home (pucca / kaccha), primary source of energy for lighting, electricity units
consumed, expense on domestic servant /cook and LPG, ownership of air cooler/
conditioner
Kitchen facilities Primary source of energy for cooking & ownership of appliances/white goods like stove,
pressure cooker & refrigerator
Education Expense on education
Hygiene Expense on washing soap/soda, other washing requisites ,women and men toiletries &
ownership of white goods like washing machine & water purifier
Entertainment Expense on entertainment & ownership of radio, television, VCR/VCP/DVD player, tape
recorder, CD player and personal computer
Communication Expense on landline telephone and mobile, ownership of telephone instrument and
mobile handset
Transportation Expense on conveyance, ownership of personal transport vehicles like bicycle, motor
cycle, scooter, motor car and jeep
Healthcare Institutional and Non-institutional medical expense
Source : NSS Round 66- Consumer Expenditure Data
District-wise view of Well Being Index & Income Surrogates
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
District-wise Well Being Index
Notes : 1) Per capita expenditure has been used as a surrogate for incomes
District-wise per-capita Incomes1
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 5 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
Well Being Index (WBI) reveals wide diversity and disparity across districts,
often within the same state
• Most of peninsular India and North India are
rated as average or better’
• Most of Central and East India are average
or worse off
District State
Chennai Tamil Nadu
Mumbai Maharashtra
North Goa Goa
Bangalore Karnataka
Ernakulam Kerala
Best 5
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
District-wise Well Being Index
6
STATE WISE WBI RANKS…(1/3)
Tamil Nadu & Andhra Pradesh are the large1 state economies in the ‘top-tier’
state list otherwise composed of smaller states
State WBI 2013
Rank
Goa 1
Delhi 2
Pondicherry 3
Kerala 4
Tamil Nadu 5
Punjab 6
Himachal Pradesh 7
Andhra Pradesh 8
Sikkim 9
Haryana 10
Top Tier States
1
2
4
7
9
6
5
10
3
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
Notes : 1) Large states are with economies > 5% of India GDP at FY12 Current prices
8
7
STATE WISE WBI RANKS…(2/3)
Mid-tier is mostly composed of large1 state economies including Maharashtra,
Gujarat, Karnataka & West Bengal
State WBI 2013
Rank
Uttaranchal 11
Nagaland 12
Maharashtra 13
Jammu & Kashmir 14
Karnataka 15
West Bengal 16
Gujarat 17
Rajasthan 18
Mizoram 19
Manipur 20
Mid Tier States
12
14
15
19
13
17
18
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
Rajasthan is better-off
in the league of
BIMARU states
11
Notes : 1) Large states are with economies > 5% of India GDP at FY12 Current prices
20
16
8
STATE WISE WBI RANKS…(3/3)
Bottom tier is composed of states from the Eastern and North Eastern regions
State WBI 2013
Rank
Uttar Pradesh 21
Meghalaya 22
Arunachal Pradesh 23
Madhya Pradesh 24
Orissa 25
Tripura 26
Jharkhand 27
Chattisgarh 28
Assam 29
Bihar 30
Bottom Tier States
23
29
26 24
21
25
28
30
27
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
22
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 9 9
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
All India Top 20 districts in Well-being score
District State/UT WBI Rank
Chennai Tamil Nadu 1
Mumbai Suburban Maharashtra 2
North Goa Goa 3
Bangalore Karnataka 4
Ernakulam Kerala 5
Mahe Pondicherry 6
Pondicherry Pondicherry 7
Thane Maharastra 8
Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu 9
Hardwar Uttaranchal 10
Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh 11
Thiruvallur Tamil Nadu 12
Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 13
Kolkata West Bengal 14
South Goa Goa 15
Thiruvananthapuram Kerala 16
Pathanamthitta Kerala 17
Delhi1 Delhi 18
Chandigarh Chandigarh 19
Kapurthala Punjab 20
Total districts covered - 588
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation; Two Delhi districts in All India top 10 – Delhi South ( Rank 5), Delhi East ( Rank 6)
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 10 10
Region-wise top 5 districts in Well-being score
Indore,
MP
13
Kolkata,
West Bengal
29
Guwahati,
Assam
39
Papum Pare,
Arunachal P
57
Dimapur,
Nagaland
58
North 24
Parganas,
West Bengal
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
1
4
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Bengaluru, Karnataka
6 Mahe, Pondicherry
8 Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu
5 Ernakulum, Kerala
9
18
Kapurthala, Punjab 24
Chandigarh
28 Panchkula, Haryana
23
N
Hardwar, Uttaranchal
Delhi 1
2
North,
Goa
3
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
7
Thane,
Maharashtra
14
South,
Goa
26
W
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 11 11
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Home Amenities
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• Above Average: Majority of Tamil Nadu,
Kerala, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh and
Uttaranchal
• Below Average: Central India and Eastern
states
District State
North Goa Goa
Chennai Tamil Nadu
Mumbai Maharashtra
Kolkata West Bengal
Mahe Pondicherry
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 12 12
Region-wise top 5 districts in Home Amenities score
4
Kolkata,
West Bengal
9
Guwahati,
Assam
28
Aizwal,
Mizoram
41
Papum Pare,
Arunachal P
52
Kolasib,
Mizoram
2
5
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Mahe, Pondicherry
10 Yanam, Pondicherry
11 Bangalore Urban, Karnataka
6 Kancheepuram, Tamil Nadu
7
8 Delhi 1
Kapurthala, Punjab
16 Jalandhar, Punjab
17 Patiala, Punjab
14 Chandigarh
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
1
North,
Goa
3
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
19
Thane,
Maharashtra
24
Diu,
Daman &
Diu
25
Ahmedabad,
Gujarat
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 13 13
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Kitchen facilities
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• All districts in Tamil Nadu & Andhra
Pradesh are above average
• Eastern MP, Chhattisgarh and states in
Eastern India are below average
District State
Yanam Pondicherry
Lahul & Spiti Himachal Pradesh
Chennai Tamil Nadu
Coimbatore Tamil Nadu
Bangalore Karnataka
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 14 14
Region-wise top 5 districts in Kitchen facilities score
12
Kolkata, WB
18
Guwahati,
Assam
19
North
Morgam,
Sikkim
27
Dimapur,
Nagaland
28
East
Gangtok,
Sikkim
1
3
Pondicherry
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
5 Bangalore, Karnataka
7 Namakkal, Tamil Nadu
4 Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
2
10 G. Buddha Nagar, UP
25 Chandigarh
34 Ludhiana, Punjab
16
Lahul & Spiti, HP
6 8
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
13
North,
Goa
21 22
Daman,
Daman &
Diu
Diu,
Daman &
Diu Nagpur,
Maharashtra
Delhi 1
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 15 15
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Hygiene
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• Most districts in peninsular India along
with HP and Uttaranchal are ranked
average and above
• Most of the districts in UP, Bihar, Assam,
Nagaland, Meghalaya, Tripura are ranked
below “Average”
District State
Pondicherry Pondicherry
Wardha Maharashtra
Lahul & Spiti Himachal Pradesh
Dindigul Tamil Nadu
Mysore Karnataka
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 16 16
Region-wise top 5 districts in Hygiene score
64
Kolkata,
West Bengal
70 77 115 125
East
Gangtok,
Sikkim
1
4
Yanam, Pondicherry
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
6
Karaikal, Pondicherry 7
5 Mysore, Karnataka
N
Thanjavur, Tamil
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
3
8 Hardwar, Uttaranchal
38
69
Hamirpur, HP
19 Delhi1
Lahul & Spiti, HP
2
Wardha,
Maharashtra
9
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
26
Thane,
Maharashtra
34
Daman,
Daman &
Diu
35
South Goa,
Goa
G. Buddha Nagar, UP
Rayagada ,
Orissa
Debagarh,
Orissa Sahibganj,
Jharkhand
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 17 17
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Entertainment
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• All districts in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh
& Kerala are above average
• Most of Rajasthan, Central India, UP and
Bihar are average or below
District State
Krishna Andhra Pradesh
Yanam Pondicherry
Coimbatore Tamil Nadu
Daman Daman & Diu
South Goa Goa
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 18 18
Region-wise top 5 districts in Entertainment score
18
Kolkata,
West Bengal
27
East
Gangtok,
Sikkim
36
North
Mongam,
Sikkim
51
West Kameng,
Arunachal P
56
Papum Pare,
Arunachal P
1
2
Krishna, AP
Pondicherry
6 Thiruvallur, Tamil Nadu
7 Bangalore, Karnataka
3 Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
45
47
Hardwar, Uttaranchal
76
77
Chandigarh 53
4
Daman
5
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
9
South,
Goa
32
Thane,
Maharashtra
34
North,
Goa
Delhi 1
Ghaziabad, UP
Panchkula, Haryana
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 19 19
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Healthcare Spends
District State
North 24-Parganas West Bengal
Upper Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh
Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh
Pathanamthitta Kerala
Mandsaur Madhya Pradesh
Best 5
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• “Best”: Kerala, Punjab, Eastern
Maharashtra,
• Average and Below : Most of Orissa,
Chhattisgarh, South Gujarat, Bihar,
Jharkhand
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 20 20
Region-wise top 5 districts in Healthcare Spends
1
North 24
Paraganas,
West Bengal
2
Upper Dabang
Valley,
Arunachal P.
3
Papum Pare,
Arunachal
Pradesh
9
West
Kameng,
Arunachal
21
4
8
Pathanamthita, Kerala
Kottayam, Kerala
12 Thrissur, Kerala
17 Idukki, Kerala
10 Alappuzha, Kerala
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
5
Mandsaur,
MP
6
Neemuch,
MP
11
Solapur,
Maharashtra
15
Latur,
Maharashtra
18
Gwalior
, MP
13
14
Una, HP
Patiala, Punjab
19 Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab
25 Deoria, UP
16 Sangrur, Punjab
Dhalai,
Tripura
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 21 21
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Communication
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• Average and Above : Most of Peninsular
India , Punjab, HP, Uttaranchal, West
Bengal
• Average and Below: Most of UP, Bihar,
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and N East
District State
Chennai Tamil Nadu
Chandigarh Chandigarh
Bangalore Karnataka
Meerut UP
Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 22 22
Region-wise top 5 districts in Communication score
10
Kolkata,
West Bengal
16
Guwahati,
Assam
25
Dimapur,
Nagaland
36
East Gangtok,
Sikkim
80
Singhbhum – E,
Jharkhand
1
3
Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Bengaluru, Karnataka
10 Rangareddi, AP
14 Mahe, Pondicherry
5 Hyderabad, AP
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
2
4
Chandigarh
Meerut, UP
8 Hardwar, Uttaranchal
9 Delhi1
6
7
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
12
Bhopal, MP
13
Thane,
Maharashtra
19
Surat,
Gujarat
20
Pune,
Maharashtra
G. Buddha Nagar
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 23 23
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Transportation
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
• Most districts of West, South and North
West India are average or better
• Average and Below : Central and Eastern
India, UP
District State
Lahul & Spiti Himachal Pradesh
Bangalore Karnataka
Thiruvananthapuram Kerala
North Goa Goa
Idukki Kerala
Best 5
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 24 24
Region-wise top 5 districts in Transportation score
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
26
Kolkata,
West Bengal
32
East Khasi
Hills,
Meghalaya
52
East
Gangtok,
Sikkim
60
West Khasi Hills,
Meghalaya
64
Jaintia Hills,
Meghalaya
2
3
Bangalore,, Karnataka
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
9 Pathanamthitta, Kerala
10 Wayanad, Kerala
5 Idukki, Kerala
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
4
North,
Goa
7 18
South,
Goa
25
Surat,
Gujarat
28
Thane,
Maharashtra
1
7
Lahul & Spiti, HP
12
Doda, J&K
57 Kullu, HP
8
Hardwar, Uttaranchal
Delhi 1
Notes : 1) Composite rank of all the Delhi districts used for representation
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 25 25
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well Being Index – Category Maps : Education Spends
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
District State
Hardwar Uttaranchal
West Kameng Arunachal Pradesh
Dimapur Nagaland
Rewari Haryana
Bhopal Madhya Pradesh
Best 5
• Average and above: Most districts in
Punjab, Haryana, North Rajasthan,
Kerala, Uttaranchal and Tripura
• Above and Below: Most districts in
Orissa, North Karnataka, Bihar, MP and
Chhattisgarh
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 26 26
Region-wise top 5 districts in Education spends
2
West
Kameng,
Arunachal P
3
Dimapur,
Nagaland
7
Mon,
Nagaland
8
Imphal West,
Manipur
9
Mokokchung ,
Nagaland
18
29
Mahe, Pondicherry
Alapuzha, Kerala
36 Bangalore, Karnataka
43 Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala
33 Ernakulam, Kerala
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
5
Bhopal,
MP
14
Indore, MP
49
Mumbai,
Maharashtra
65
Ujjain, MP
70
Thane,
Maharashtra
1
4
Haridwar, Uttaranchal
Rewari , Harayana
10 Mahendragarh, Harayana
12 Sonipat, Haryana
6 Meerut, UP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 27 27
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Well-being Index across years
Well-being Index 2013 Well-being Index 2010
Notes : Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
Most states from peninsular India,
West Bengal and Orissa have
shown an improvement
North Eastern states (Nagaland,
Mizoram, Assam) and J&K have
seen a huge decline
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 28 28
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
While the WBI captures all major material parameters, it
does not include a very important reality of Indian society –
the well being, status and treatment of women
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 29 29
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
3 categories were selected to form the Female Security Index (FSI) on the basis
of their ability to explain the status and treatment of women in India
• Gender ratio1 in 0-6 years age group
• Incidences of Rape2
• Dowry deaths2
Source: Census 2011: National Crime Research Bureau (2009, 2010)
Notes : 1) Females per 1000 males 2)Incidences per lakh female population of district
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 30 30
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
District-wise view of Female Security Index (FSI) 2009-10
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 31 31
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
A female security index (FSI) has been created using gender ratio and crime
against women
District-wise Female Security Index
• Clear divide between North India & South
India
• Uttaranchal and HP in North India are
average or better
• Worst ratings for districts in Punjab,
Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, West UP and
North Rajasthan
District State
The Nilgiris Tamil Nadu
Pondicherry Pondicherry
Karaikal Pondicherry
Sivaganga Tamil Nadu
Mahe Pondicherry
Best 5
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
32
STATE WISE FSI RANKS…(1/3)
Southern states, Gujarat and most North-Eastern states are the most secure
for women
State FSI 2013
Rank
Pondicherry 1
Nagaland 2
Kerala 3
Tamil Nadu 4
Manipur 5
Meghalaya 6
Arunachal
Pradesh 7
Gujarat 8
Karnataka 9
Mizoram 10
Top Tier States
9
8
3
7
4
2
6 5
10
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
1
33
STATE WISE FSI RANKS…(2/3)
Maharashtra, AP, Chhattisgarh, HP and West Bengal are in the middle tier
State FSI 2013 Rank
Andhra Pradesh 11
Himachal Pradesh 12
Tripura 13
Chattisgarh 14
Goa 15
Maharashtra 16
Sikkim 17
West Bengal 18
Assam 19
Jammu & Kashmir 20
Mid Tier States
16
12
15
17
13 18
19
20
14
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
11
34
STATE WISE FSI RANKS…(3/3)
BIMARU, Orissa and most of North India are the worst in terms of female
security
State FSI 2013
Rank
Uttaranchal 21
Bihar 22
Orissa 23
Jharkhand 24
Uttar Pradesh 25
Rajasthan 26
Delhi 27
Punjab 28
Madhya Pradesh 29
Haryana 30
Bottom Tier States
26
30
22
28
25
29
23
27
24
Best
Average
Worst
© Copyright Tata Strategic Management Group 2012
21
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 35 35
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
The Top 20 districts by FSI Score is dominated by the southern states, with the
conspicuous absence of metros and mini-metros
District State/UT FSI Rank WBI Rank
The Nilgiris Tamil Nadu 1 80
Pondicherry Pondicherry 2 9
Karaikal Pondicherry 3 48
Sivaganga Tamil Nadu 4 83
Mahe Pondicherry 5 8
Thanjavur Tamil Nadu 6 50
North Cachar Hills Assam 7 583
Lahul & Spiti Himachal Pradesh 8 64
Tawang Arunachal Pradesh 9 572
Kancheepuram Tamil Nadu 10 11
West Kameng Arunachal Pradesh 11 74
The Dangs Gujarat 12 546
Coimbatore Tamil Nadu 13 17
Thiruvarur Tamil Nadu 14 114
Virudhunagar Tamil Nadu 15 76
Nagapattinam Tamil Nadu 16 134
Erode Tamil Nadu 17 56
Udupi Karnataka 18 66
Thiruvallur Tamil Nadu 19 15
Mokokchung Nagaland 20 181
Total districts covered - 588
36
FSI RANKINGS: TOP 8 URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS1
Chennai is the most secure followed by Bengaluru, while Delhi NCR and Hyderabad U/A
feature at the bottom
Kolkata U/A
Chennai
Mumbai MMR 5
1
3
Bengaluru 2
Delhi NCR 8
Hyderabad U/A 7
Ahmedabad 4
Pune U/A 6
Notes: 1) Mumbai includes: Greater Mumbai UA (Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban, Navi Mumbai, Thane); Delhi includes:
NCT of Delhi; Kolkata includes: Kolkata city; Pune includes: Pune City, Pimpri – Chinchwad: Hyderabad
includes: Hyderabad, Secunderabad; For Others, UAs as defined by Census
37
Hyderabad UA’s low FSI rank is driven by higher dowry deaths while Delhi’s
rank is lower due to all three factors
FSI Rank
within Top
8 cities UA
Gender
Ratio
(Female
/1000M)
Rapes -
Nos
Rapes -
per lakh
females
Dowry
Deaths -
Nos
Dowry
Deaths -
per lakh
females
1 Chennai 964 43 1.9 18 0.2
2 Bengaluru 940 65 1.6 51 0.7
3 Kolkata UA2 946 220 3.3 73 1.1
4 Ahmedabad 852 56 2.0 9 0.1
5 Mumbai MMR 900 294 3.4 33 0.4
6 Pune UA 883 80 3.3 6 0.1
7 Hyderabad UA 943 135 3.6 87 1.7
8 Delhi NCR2 866 581 5.8 193 1.9
FSI RANKINGS: TOP 8 URBAN AGGLOMERATIONS1
Notes: 1) Mumbai includes: Greater Mumbai UA (Mumbai and Mumbai Suburban, Navi Mumbai, Thane); Delhi includes: NCT
of Delhi; Kolkata includes: Kolkata city; Pune includes: Pune City, Pimpri – Chinchwad: Hyderabad includes:
Hyderabad, Secunderabad; For Others, UAs as defined by Census 2) Estimated based on district crime figures
38
FSI RANKINGS: TOP 8 CITIES
Chennai is the most secure followed by Bengaluru, while Delhi and Ahmedabad feature at
the bottom
Kolkata
Chennai
Mumbai 6
1
3
Bengaluru 2
Delhi 8
Hyderabad 5
Ahmedabad 7
Pune 4
39
Ahmedabad city’s low FSI rank is driven by lower gender ratio, while Delhi’s
rank is lower due to all three factors
FSI Rank
within Top
8 cities City
Gender
Ratio
(Female
per
1000M)
Rapes -
Nos
Rapes -
per lakh
females
Dowry
Deaths -
Nos
Dowry
Deaths -
per lakh
females
1 Chennai 964 43 1.9 18 0.2
2 Bengaluru 940 65 1.6 51 0.7
3 Kolkata 930 37 1.7 11 0.3
4 Pune1 883 52 3.3 4 0.1
5 Hyderabad 943 46 2.3 36 1.9
6 Mumbai 900 191 3.3 18 0.3
7 Ahmedabad 852 56 2.0 9 0.1
8 Delhi 866 488 6.3 118 1.5
FSI RANKINGS: TOP 8 CITIES
Notes: 1) Estimated based on district crime figures
Total rapes in 7 metros/mini-metros (excluding Delhi) : 490
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 40 40
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region-wise top 5 districts in FSI score
7
N.C Hills,
Assam
9
Tawang,
Arunachal P
11
West
Kameng,
Arunachal P
20
Mokokchung,
Nagaland
22
Tirap,
Arunachal P
1
2
The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu
Pondicherry
4
Mahe, Pondicherry 5
3 Karaikal, Pondicherry
N
W
S
E
All India
Rank District, State
Total districts
covered - 588 Sivaganga, Tamil Nadu
12 24
The Dangs,
Gujarat
27
Diu
45
Dantewada,
Chattisgarh
62
Gadchiroli,
Maharashtra
81 Tehri Garhwal, Uttaranchal
8
29
Lahul & Spiti, HP
Chandauli, UP
80 Chamoli, Uttaranchal
72 Uttarkashi, Uttaranchal
Dohad,
Gujarat
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 41 41
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Female Security Index – Category Maps : Gender Ratio (0-6 years)
• Clear divide between North, West India and
rest of India
• Majority of Chattisgarh is rated the “Best”
• Himachal Pradesh is significantly better
than the rest of North India
District State
Lahul & Spiti Himachal Pradesh
Tawang Arunachal Pradesh
Dantewada Chattisgarh
Guwahati Assam
Bastar Chattisgarh
Best 5
Highest Ratio – Best score
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 42 42
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region-wise top 5 districts in Gender Ratio (0-6 years)
1005
Tawang,
Arunachal P
994
Guwahati,
Assam
988
Nabarangapu
r, Orissa
987
Kolasib,
Mizoram
985
Nawada,
Bihar
982
977
The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu
970
West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
969
Toothukudi, Tamil Nadu
970
Kodagu, Karnataka
N
W
S
E
0 – 6 age
gender ratio District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
1005
Dantewada,
Chattisgarh
991
Bastar,
Chattisgarh
976
Rajnandgaon
Chattisgarh
975 974
Kanker,
Chattisgarh
976
968
Chandauli, UP
Balrampur, UP
953 Kinnaur, HP
962 Kullu, HP
Jashpur,
Chattisgarh
East Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
1013 Lahul & Spiti, HP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 43 43
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Female Security Index – Category Maps : Rape Incidences
• Most districts of MP, Chattisgarh, Orissa, N
Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab and HP are
average or worse
• Most districts of Gujarat, Peninsular India,
Bihar, UP and Uttaranchal are average or
better
District State
Karaikal Pondicherry
Mahe Pondicherry
Tamenglong Manipur
Diu Daman & Diu
Chandel Manipur
Best 5
Least incidences – Best score
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 44 44
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region-wise Worst 5 districts in Rape Incidences (per lakh female population)
28
Champhai,
Mizoram
28
Darrang,
Assam
23
Bongaigaon,
Assam
21
Goalpara,
Assam
20
Dhemaji,
Assam
13
13
Andamans
Bijapur, Karnataka
6.1 West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh
6.1 Kodagu, Karnataka
6.3 Wayanad, Kerala
N
W
S
E
Rape incidences per lakh
female population (Avg of
CY09, CY10) District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
9.3
Rajgarh,
MP
9.3
Katni, MP
9.2
Shajapur,
MP
8.8
Raigarh,
Chattisgarh
8.8
Dhar, MP
11
10
Kinnaur, HP
Doda, J&K
10
Kullu, HP
9
Pratapgarh, HP
10
Panipat, Haryana
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 45 45
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Female Security Index – Category Maps : Dowry Death Incidences
• Most districts in Gujarat, Kerala, TN, HP and
North East are average or better.
• Most districts in MP, UP, Bihar, W Bengal and
Haryana are average or worse
States
Number of districts with 0
annual dowry death
incidences / Total districts
Manipur 9/9
Mizoram 8/8
Nagaland 7/7
Meghalaya 7/7
Arunachal Pradesh 14/15
Best 5 states2
Least incidences – Best score
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 2) More than 100 districts have reported nil dowry death incidences in India in the 2009-10 period
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 46 46
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Region-wise Worst 5 districts in Dowry Death Incidences (per lakh female
population)
9
Jahanabad,
Bihar
5
Nalanda,
Bihar
4
Vaishali
Bihar
4
Bhojpur,
Bihar
4
Baleshwar,
Orissa
2.3
2.1
Bangalore Rural
Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh
2 Bijapur, Karnataka
1.9 Medak, Andhra Pradesh
2.1 Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh
N
W
S
E
Dowry deaths per lakh
female population (Avg of
CY09, CY10)
District, State
Total districts
covered - 588
11
Bilaspur
Chattisgarh
5
Bhind, MP
4
Narasimh
apur, MP
4
Dhar, MP
4
Sidhi, MP
5
5
Dhaulpur, Rajasthan
Gurgaon, Haryana
4
Etah, UP
4
Etawah, UP
4
Firozabad, UP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 47 47
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Female Security Index over the years(Comparable methodology)
Female Security Index - 20131 Female Security Index - 2010
Notes :1) This map varies from the FSI Map previously presented, as it is created retaining the previous edition’s methodology.: Gender Ratio of 0-6 yrs has been considered in this edition, unlike to overall Gender ratio considered earlier. 2) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
Slight deterioration in Rajasthan,
Maharashtra, Jharkhand
Uttar Pradesh and Punjab have seen
significant decline in their ranking on FSI
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 48 48
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
A comparison of well being index and female security index reveals some
interesting findings
District-wise Well Being Index District-wise Female Security Index
Notes : 1) Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available
Some of the high WBI
states are lower ranked in
FSI
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 49 49
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Southern states are the only ones faring well on both Wellbeing and Female
security
Southern states rank higher
on both parameters
UP, MP and some
Eastern states fare low
on both WBI & FSI
In-spite of a better WBI score,
Delhi, Punjab & Haryana fare
low on FSI
Fe
ma
le
Se
cu
rity
In
de
x
Well Being
Index
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 50 50
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Conclusions
• Vivid diversity and disparity across districts
• There is no apparent correlation between the Well Being Index and Female Security
Index
• Insights on district should be the foundation for action planning
• This study is for NGOs, policy makers and Corporates (CSR):
To improve ‘well being’ in rural India
To improve gender security
Report available to all interested parties
51
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
AREAS OF INTEREST
The following are further areas of interest for the Practice focusing on Social
Sector
Nutrition: Infants & Mothers
Purified drinking water
Low cost housing & sanitation
Primary education
1
2
3
4
Basic energy 5
Primary healthcare 6
52
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
In the Social Sector Tata Strategic Management Group can offer support to
address issues impact the real Bottom of Pyramid
NEED FOR CSR CONSULTING
52
Fund Creation and Use
• CSR Objectives & Focus sectors
• Allocation to each sector
• Beneficiaries
• Goal & Impact
Implementation Partners • Ground level implementation structure
• Alignment of Implementation partner’s capabilities to the project requirements
• Create new implementation partners
Implementation Process
• Transparency in the fund utilization reporting
• Monitoring of progress and course correction
• Assessment of project impact
NGO Trusts Other
Agency
FOCUS AREAS KEY CONCERNS OUR OFFERINGS
CSR Strategy
Formulation
Implementation
Capacity
Building
Performance
Monitoring and
Impact
Assessment
• Process for efficient implementation and turnaround
• Organizational structure, roles & responsibilities, KPIs for
effective fund utilization
Delivery
Effectiveness
- Funding Agency
- Implementation Partner
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 53 53
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Mumbai
B-1001, Marathon Futurex,
N. M. Joshi Marg, Mumbai 400 013
Phone: +91 22 6637 6789
Fax: +91 22 6637 6600
Your Contacts at Tata Strategic
Raman Kalyanakrishnan
Practice head
TATA STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
Mobile: +91 9833792920
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: +91 22 6637 6712
Delhi
Level 12, Building no 8, Tower C,
DLF Cyber City , Phase II, Gurgaon – 122002
Phone: + +91 124 4696692
Fax: +91 124 4696970