Welcome to the 2012 Practical Farm Research results publication

Welcome to the 2012 Practical Farm Research results publication. Before you review the Practical Farm Research studies in this book, please read the reviews written by the directors from each site. They provide an overview of the growing season to help you gain perspective and understanding for the data presented. Also, you will notice that for some of our research plots, we calculate revenue. Market price volatility makes it difficult to figure revenue and income per acre for the crops and inputs that we test and have it applicable to every farmer. The following prices reflect the yearly average of Friday’s closing price (October 2011 to September 2012) of our local markets near our four Practical Farm Research locations. We then rounded the numbers for simplicity in calculating returns. You may need to refigure your own return per acre for prices that you expect to receive if they differ significantly from the commodity and input prices we used.

Corn $5.90 per bushel (Waxy corn premium $0.70 per bushel)Soybeans $13.20 per bushelDrying Costs $0.04 per point of moisture per bushel 28% Nitrogen $375.00 per ton32% Nitrogen $448.00 per tonBase Nitrogen Rates First year corn: 180 lbs./A. Continuous corn: 225 lbs./A.

Other costs and inputs specific to a study will be listed on the page of the study.

The Summary Comparison pages near the front of this book contain data from Farmer Plots, Beck’s PFR, Replicated testing, University and third party testing. You may obtain copies and/or view the individual farmer plots in the following ways:

Visit our website www.beckshybrids.com/research or contact Beck’s main office at 1-800-937-2325 or your Sales Representative for a printed copy or a CD containing farmer plots for specific regions that are of interest.

At the Central Indiana Practical Farm Research location we were able to get the first planting date entry planted on March 15th. The lack of early moisture this spring made the ground conditions very favorable during the planting season. Receiving less than 3” of rain in April allowed us to get over 60% of the corn plots planted. May proved to be busy due to the fact that we were able to plant the remainder of the corn plots and over 80% of the soybean plots at the Central Indiana PFR location. This spring proved to be one of the most cooperative planting seasons because we had a large window of time with favorable weather conditions. We were able to get ground worked, herbicide applied and nitrogen sidedressed in a timely manner. We only received 6.3” of rain from April through June, almost 2” less than in 2011, which provided our biggest challenge of the 2012 growing season. This kept nutrients from getting into the soil solution and becoming available for the crop, as it is needed for growth. The other large challenge that we had this year was the intense amount of heat during the growing season, especially when the early planted corn pollinated. This was most evident in July when the hot and dry conditions caused the most damage. We would have liked to have seen more rain and moderate temperatures in July to help the corn pollinate and fill ears. We were able to get wheat cut early on June 20th and double crop beans planted on June 27th. The late season rains in July and August proved timely, allowing soybean plants to continue to grow, fill pods and increase pod counts. Even though we had adverse weather conditions this growing season, we had very good yields. We started corn harvest by yielding 235.8 Bu./A. with BECK 6175AMX™*. The amazing thing is that Phoenix 5642A4**, planted almost a month later on May 10th yielded 307.0 Bu./A. Corn that pollinated later in more moderate temperatures had the opportunity to reach its yield potential. Soybean yields were very strong reaching over 80 Bu./A. Rainfall, which we greatly needed to recharge the soil profile, made finding a dry window to harvest beans more difficult because of the wet soil conditions. Harvest started on September 12th and the last corn plot was harvested on October 28th. Enjoy reading this year’s research results from Beck’s PFR, Farmer Plots and University Data and as always feel free to contact us with questions and suggestions for next year’s research.

The 2012 crop year at the Southern Indiana PFR farm actually began in the fall of 2011 with cover crops being sown on October 4th followed by wheat being planted on October 7th. Warm temperatures throughout the fall and winter led to aggressive growth by both our wheat and cover crops. Spring field work began with burndown herbicide applications on our cover crop and no-till corn studies on March 13th. Above average temperatures and dry conditions in late March and early April allowed for our first corn planting date entry to be planted on March 21st, followed by a second planting on March 29th. The first week of April beheld the planting of nearly half of the corn studies. Cold weather moved in the second week of April resulting in freezing temperatures that damaged early maturity wheat varieties and led to some tissue damage to March planted corn. Corn planting resumed again on April 19th and was completed on April 23rd. First crop soybeans were planted on April 24th and May 2nd. May 5th brought a much needed 1.4” rain event.

The month of May allowed the completion of sidedressing and post herbicide spraying. It also consisted of 24 straight days with no measurable rainfall. This proved to be beneficial for wheat, and to some degree on corn, allowing roots to grow deeper to access moisture later in the season. Wheat harvest began with the cutting of BECK 87 on May 26th. A rain event on May 29th brought 0.4” of rain. In the first week of June wheat harvest was completed, which resulted in the highest yielding wheat crop that we’ve grown at the Southern Indiana PFR farm. Double crop soybeans were also planted the first week of June followed by nearly 0.5” of rain on June 11th. However, we did not receive rain again until July 1st. Double crop soybean stands were adequate after emergence, but the lack of rainfall throughout the month of June led to excessive stand losses.Double crop soybeans were replanted on July 13th following a 0.75” rainfall event on July 12th. Another 1.4” of rain was received on July 14th. This event proved to be critical for corn in the highly productive areas of the farm, as well as for first crop soybeans that were between the R3 - R4 growth stage. Although the remainder of July was dry, the earlier rain carried us until August 2nd when we received over 4” of much needed rain! On August 9th we had another successful Southern Indiana Field Show. Many thanks to all those who attended and made this year’s show another huge success!Corn harvest began on August 20th and was mostly wrapped up by September 12th. Corn yields were all over the board, mostly depending on which soil type a trial was planted on. However, yields in the historically high producing areas of the farm still managed to provide average yields, which resulted in some very good data considering the challenges of the dry summer. Soybean harvest began on August 31st and was mostly completed by October 4th. Soybean yields proved to be some of the highest ever produced on the Southern Indiana PFR farm; mainly due to the rain event on July 14th and those that followed throughout the months of August and September. Unfortunately, the late replanted double crop beans received a killing frost on October 11th that kept us from recording any yield data this year. We hope the information presented in this publication will help our customers in accessing the many different agronomic practices that could be implemented on their farms. Feel free to contact us at any time with questions or ideas for studies you would like to see tested in the future!

The start of the 2012 growing season at the Central Illinois Practical Farm Research location looked very promising. For the first time, we planted two planting dates in March, where we are usually lucky to get one, if any at all. Not only did we plant corn on March 14th, but we also planted a soybean planting date entry as well. Planting conditions were optimum in the middle of March. The early planted corn emerged very well and was looking very healthy. However, a frost event occurred in early April which reduced our early planted corn stands by 40%. The month of March only received .92” of rain. Early April did not have many rainy days, but the temperature was substantially cooler than March temperatures. Corn that was planted between April 1st and Easter provided excellent yields. The corn that was planted during this time frame flowered before the excessive heat in July. On the other hand, corn that was planted between Easter and May 20th flowered during the hot dry spell in July. Yields suffered dramatically during this planting date range. During the month of April, CILPFR received 3.64” of rain, which would be the highest monthly amount for 2012 growing season.

It seemed to rain just enough in early-mid May to keep us out of the fields. Corn that was planted on May 23rd - 25th provided excellent yields in the planting date study and in any other study on the farm for that matter. The corn in these studies flowered after the heat in July, therefore providing higher yields. The month of May offered 2.2” of rain. As July and August arrived, temperatures increased and rainfall amounts diminished. This caused severe stress on plants that were pollinating during this hot dry stretch of weather. The drought of 2012 will not be forgotten anytime soon, but for the little amount of rainfall that was received, the crops performed very well. Corn yields at CILPFR averaged 160 Bu./A. with a range of 70 - 270 Bu./A. Soybean yields benefited from late rains and yields averaged 55 Bu./A.In summary, early 2012 weather set the stage for a perfect growing season, but with limiting rainfall amounts and extreme heat, crop conditions changed quickly. Crop yields turned out better than expected and it was a very exciting year for us here at CILPFR. Our PFR team continues to test agronomic studies that our customers find valuable and even expanded research to obtain some on-farm customer testing through our PFR Partner Program.We hope you enjoy our agronomic research results and we look forward to hosting meetings throughout the winter months explaining and showcasing our PFR data.

It was another challenging season at the Southern Illinois PFR location that ended with interesting results. Abnormally low rainfall in March and April allowed us to begin planting much sooner than normal. With warm temperatures and ideal planting conditions, stand establishment for corn was excellent for those studies planted in March and the first week of April. The middle of April brought cold and wet weather, creating the need to replant most studies planted in early April. Soybean planting started April 28th, which resulted in good stand establishment for all planting dates.The last significant rainfall event of .99” occurred on May 3rd. The rest of May saw a rainfall total of 0.25”, June 0.33” and July 0.53”. This low rainfall, coupled with the intense and extended heat, caused devastation to the corn studies. Yields ranged from 0 - 60 Bu./A., for a farm average of 26.7 Bu./A. Consequently, none of the corn studies are included in this publication. The soybeans were also in dire straits. By August 1st, plants were 18” tall with five to ten pods per plant and many plants were starting to die. Relief came on August 3rd with a 3.1” rainfall event and continued with an additional 3” the rest of August. September provided another

5.8” of precipitation which led to a remarkable recovery in the soybeans and resulted in very respectable ending yields.At the Southern Illinois PFR location, we are glad to represent some of the more challenging conditions common to the tougher and lighter soils, and we enjoy attempting to find answers for these conditions. We are very open to your ideas, and hope our efforts lead to greater potential profitability for your operation.

Case #73: It had become known around the community that a particular farmer had stopped working with multiple seed companies. Instead, he was working with just

one. The detective's mission was to find out who and why.

"We've noticed you are treated differently compared to other farmers around here. Who are you working with and why are you so successful?"

Scan the QR code or visit www.suspectofsuccess.com to watch his interrogation.

TABLE OF CONTENTSMULTI-YEAR COMPARISONS PageCorn Summary 8-15Regional Corn Summary 16-27

2012 INDEPENDENT TEST RESULTS PageF.I.R.S.T. Results 28Soy Capital 28Purdue University 28

MULTI-YEAR SOYBEAN COMPARISONS PageSoybean Summary 29-37 CENTRAL INDIANA PRACTICAL CORN RESEARCH Page Office Corn Plot 38Arcadia Corn Plot 39Atlanta Corn Plot 40 Genetic Supplier Plot 41Advanced Hybrid Corn Plot in HP & MP Soils 42-43300 Bushel Attempt 44-45High School Educational Plot 46Fungicide Timing Study 47Replant Study 48-49Planting Date Study 50-51Sub-Irrigation 20" vs. 30" Rows 52-5320" vs. 30" Row Width/Population Study 54-55Zone-Till vs. Conv.-Till Long Term Study (CAB) 56Zone-Till vs. Conv.-Till Continuous Corn 57Strip-Till vs. Conv.-Till (CAB & CAC) 58-59Stress Mitigation Study 60Artesian & AQUAmax (CAB & CAC) 61Corn Origin Study 62Corn Seed Treatment 63Nitrogen Rate Study (CAB & CAC) 64-65Nitrogen Timing Study 65Nitrogen Stabilizer Study 66Phosphorus Efficiency & Micronutrient Study 67Residue Management Study 68Cover Crop Study 69Tile Drainage Study 70Corn Gypsum Study 71Corn Lime Study 72-73Quality Traits Products 74Corn Silage Study 75Root Growth Study 76

CENTRAL INDIANA PRACTICAL SOYBEAN RESEARCH PageOffice Soybean Variety Show Plot 78Arcadia Soybean Show Plot 79Atlanta Soybean Show Plot 8015" Show Plot & Specialty Beans 8120" Soybean Show Plot 82

CENTRAL INDIANA PRACTICAL SOYBEAN RESEARCH - CONTINUED Page30" Soybean Show Plot 83US 31 Show Plot 84LibertyLink Show Plot 84Escalate vs. Untreated 85Advanced Variety in No-Till (MP) & Conv.-Till (HP) 86-87100 Bushel Management Study 88-89100 Bushel Attempt 90Low Population 100 Bushel Attempt 91Soybean Herbicide Systems 92Row Spacing & Population Study 93Planting Date Study 94-95Foliar Fungicide/Insecticide Study 96VersaMax Study 97No-Till vs. Conv.-Till Long Term Study 98-99Strip-Till vs. Conv.-Till (BAC) 100Gypsum Study 101Lime Study 102-103

SOUTHERN INDIANA PRACTICAL CORN RESEARCH PageCorn after Soybeans Show Plot 104Corn after Corn Show Plot 105300 Bushel Attempt Study 106Cover Crop Study 107Fungicide Timing Study 108-109Fungicide Study 110-111Drought Tolerance Demo 111Optimum Nitrogen Rate (Cont. Corn & CAB) 112-113Nitrogen Timing 114-11520" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study 116-117Planting Date Study 118-119Replant Study 120RES 16 Tillage Study 121Tillage Study (CAB, BAC & Cont. Corn) 122-123P & K Study (CAB) 124-125Stalk Degradation Study 126

SOUTHERN INDIANA PRACTICAL SOYBEAN RESEARCH PageSoybean Show Plot 127100 Bushel Attempt 128-129Herbicide Systems Study 130Planting Date Study 131Population Study 132Soil Health Study 133Foliar Fungicide Study 134-135

CENTRAL ILLINOIS PRACTICAL CORN RESEARCH PageCorn Show Plot 138300 Bushel Attempt 139Corn Fungicide Study 140-141Twin vs. 20” vs. 30” Row Width / Population 142-143

TABLE OF CONTENTSCENTRAL ILLINOIS PRACTICAL CORN RESEARCH - CONTINUED Page30” vs. Twin Rows 144-145Planting Date Study 146-147Replant Study 148-149Nitrogen Timing (Cont. Corn) 150-151Nitrogen Timing (CAB) 152-153Nitrogen Rate (CAC & CAB) 154-155 Nitrogen Stabilizer Study 156-157Late Season Nitrogen Application 158-159N-Serve Study 160Starter Fertilizer Study 161YDrop Fertilizer/Insecticide Study 162-163 Soil Applied Insecticide 164 AirForce Study 165 Drought Tolerant Trait Study 166Specialty Show Plot 167Crop Rotation & Tillage Study 168-169Corn after Cover Crop Study 170-171Gypsum Study on Cont. Corn 172Irrigation Study 173Closing Wheel Study 174Pinch Row Compaction Study 175Carbon Penalty Study 176-177Frost Simulation 178Hail Study 179PMAX Study 180Avail Study 181Priaxor Fungicide Study 182Evito In-Furrow Fungicide Study 183VersaMax Corn Study 184Yield King Study 1850-0-14 Potassium Study 186Calcium Nitrate Study (Cont. Corn) 187Respire Foliar Study 188

CENTRAL ILLINOIS PRACTICAL SOYBEAN RESEARCH PageSoybean Show Plot 189100 Bushel Soybean Attempt 190-191Row Width & Population Study 192-193Planting Date Study 194Fungicide/Insecticide Study 195LibertyLink/Stratego YLD/Leverage Study 196Spider Mite Study 197Defoliation/Glucose Study 198Optimize Study 199Fertilizer Placement Study 200-201Soybeans after Cover Crop Study 202BioRed Study 203VersaMax Study 204Sable Nitrogen Foliar Feed Study 205BCS - 1940A SDS Study 206Calcium Nitrate Study 206AgriGuardian Micro Mix Study 207Soybean Starter Study 207Invinsa Study 208Infusion 2.0 Soybean Study 209Yield King Study 210

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS PRACTICAL SOYBEANRESEARCH PageSoybean Show Plot - South 211Soybean Show Plot - East 212Specialty Show Plot 213100 Bushel Attempt 21315" Row Width / Population Study 21420" Row Width / Population Study 215Row Spacing & Population Study 216Fungicide / Insecticide Response Study 217Herbicide Systems 218Tillage Study 219Gypsum Study 220Soil Health Study 221Foliar Treatment Study 222Sugar + Manganese Study 223In-Furrow Study 223

MULTI-LOCATIONS PRACTICAL RESEARCH PageCorn Nitrogen Utilization Study 226BioRed Study 227Nitrogen Rate Study (CAB & CAC) 228-230Soybean Fungicide Timing Study 231-234CAC Nitrogen Timing Study 235Soybean Herbicide Systems 236Nitrogen Stabilizer Study 237Variable Hybrid Planting Study 238-244

CENTRAL INDIANA PRACTICAL WHEAT RESEARCH PageArcadia Show Plot 245Atlanta Show Plot 245Seed Treatment Study 246Nitrogen/Population Study 247

SOUTHERN INDIANA PRACTICAL WHEAT RESEARCH PageShow Plot 2487.5" vs. 15" Rows by Variety 248High Yield Attempt 249Nitrogen Timing & Inhibitor Study 250-251 Nitrogen Rate Study 252 Fungicide Study 253

TRAIT IDENTIFICATION INDEX 256

8

Yrs Plots Brand Bu./A.%

Moist.$/Acre Adv. Yrs Plots Brand Bu./A.

% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 137 Phoenix 5385A3** 185.2 20.4 $64.17 1 89 BECK 5475AM™* 198.4 19.5 $2.59BECK 5354AMX™* 173.3 19.9 BECK 5140HR™* 196.3 18.3

2 137 Phoenix 5385A3** 185.7 20.2 $68.43 1 82 BECK 5475AM™* 200.8 19.6 $38.71BECK 5435AMX™* 173.8 20.3 BECK 5269HXR™* 194.3 19.8

2 92 Phoenix 5385A3** 193.4 21.0 -$10.79 1 90 BECK 5475AM™* 196.3 19.7 $59.40Channel 207-13VT3P 193.8 19.9 BECK 5354AMX™* 185.9 19.7

1 64 Phoenix 5385A3** 202.2 20.6 $43.65 1 66 BECK 5475AM™* 184.2 19.2 $97.93Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 BECK 5435AMX™* 167.7 19.7

1 65 Phoenix 5385A3** 202.1 20.6 $33.56 1 115 BECK 5475AM™* 183.9 19.4 $12.96Channel 210-57STX 197.3 21.4 BECK 5442VT3 182.4 20.0

2 42 Phoenix 5385A3** 226.8 20.8 $76.00 1 4 BECK 5475AM™* 126.6 20.9 $68.18Dekalb DKC55-09 211.6 19.6 AgriGold A6309SS 113.6 19.7

2 19 Phoenix 5385A3** 199.4 19.8 $123.39 1 22 BECK 5475AM™* 213.9 19.6 $8.60Dekalb DKC58-83 176.3 18.6 AgriGold A6573VT3P 214.8 21.2

1 8 Phoenix 5385A3** 183.2 19.8 $31.55 1 68 BECK 5475AM™* 211.6 19.6 $71.06Dekalb DKC59-37 177.3 19.5 Channel 202-32STX 197.1 18.1

2 68 Phoenix 5385A3** 202.1 20.5 $11.24 1 20 BECK 5475AM™* 220.8 20.0 $70.46Dekalb DKC59-64 199.7 20.2 Channel 209-69VT3P 208.0 19.7

2 11 Phoenix 5385A3** 186.6 21.7 $6.74 1 20 BECK 5475AM™* 220.8 20.0 $18.09Dekalb DKC61-06 185.8 22.0 Channel 210-57STX 218.7 20.7

2 130 Phoenix 5385A3** 193.4 20.4 $0.57 1 20 BECK 5475AM™* 220.8 20.0 -$4.46Dekalb DKC62-54 193.3 20.4 Dekalb DKC59-64 220.5 19.3

1 51 Phoenix 5385A3** 205.1 20.2 $31.66 1 4 BECK 5475AM™* 125.4 19.6 $21.55Pioneer P0413AM1 196.5 18.0 Dekalb DKC62-09 121.8 19.8

2 58 Phoenix 5385A3** 230.0 20.9 $36.52 1 23 BECK 5475AM™* 210.6 20.1 $32.85Pioneer P0891XR 220.9 19.2 Dekalb DKC62-54 205.7 20.7

2 100 Phoenix 5385A3** 199.3 20.4 $43.77 1 26 BECK 5475AM™* 209.1 19.3 -$3.30Pioneer P0916XR 191.6 20.4 Dekalb DKC62-97 211.3 20.4

2 79 Phoenix 5385A3** 192.8 20.4 $16.12 1 68 BECK 5475AM™* 211.6 19.6 $61.38Pioneer P1018AM1 190.5 20.8 Pioneer P0413AM1 198.5 17.9

2 84 Phoenix 5385A3** 199.4 20.4 -$3.14 1 36 BECK 5475AM™* 214.6 19.1 $61.54Pioneer P1184XR 200.8 21.0 Pioneer P0717HR 202.6 18.2

2 52 Phoenix 5385A3** 189.8 19.0 $58.22 1 22 BECK 5475AM™* 208.2 19.6 -$6.06Pioneer P1395XR 181.3 20.3 Pioneer P1184XR 209.7 19.9

*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. *XL® is a trademark of Pioneer Hi-Bred. ** Phoenix™ is a Syngenta brand distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

BECK 5475AM™* ComparisonsPhoenix 5385A3** Comparisons

CORN SUMMARY Multi-Year Yield Comparisons of Various Products

(Includes Farmer Plots, BECK'S Research, and University Data)Dollar advantage per acre is calculated using $5.90/Bu. pricing and drying costs of $0.04 per point of moisture per bushel.

Waxy dollar advantage per acre is calculated using $6.60/Bu.

9

*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

9


Moist.$/AcreAdv. Yrs Plots Brand Bu./A.

%Moist.

$/AcreAdv.

2 112 Phoenix 5552A4** 157.6 21.0 $23.77 4 649 BECK 5442VT3 206.1 19.1 $59.65Phoenix 5642A4** 153.4 21.0 BECK 5435HXR™* 195.7 19.1

2 287 Phoenix 5552A4** 185.4 20.6 $37.69 2 373 BECK 5442VT3 189.0 19.9 $75.56Phoenix 5726A4** 179.9 21.5 Phoenix 5726A4** 178.0 21.7

1 191 Phoenix 5552A4** 172.0 20.9 $0.54 4 706 BECK 5442VT3 197.4 18.4 $39.18BECK 6175AMX™* 171.3 20.4 BECK 6179VT3 191.0 18.7

2 219 Phoenix 5552A4** 183.0 21.0 $3.40 4 631 BECK 5442VT3 202.9 18.9 $41.61BECK 6272HR™* 182.4 21.0 BECK 6733HXR™* 198.7 21.1

2 79 Phoenix 5552A4** 187.5 20.1 $7.75 3 123 BECK 5442VT3 196.5 18.9 $35.63AgriGold A6458VT3 185.1 19.3 AgriGold A6458VT3 189.9 18.6

1 97 Phoenix 5552A4** 190.3 21.4 -$1.56 3 147 BECK 5442VT3 215.0 19.5 $26.22AgriGold A6573VT3P 191.8 22.3 AgriGold A6533VT3 211.6 20.3

2 52 Phoenix 5552A4** 200.0 22.0 $47.11 1 107 BECK 5442VT3 217.2 20.3 $80.22Channel 207-13VT3P 188.4 19.6 AgriGold A6573VT3P 205.7 22.1

1 64 Phoenix 5552A4** 206.2 21.8 $56.45 2 81 BECK 5442VT3 202.8 21.1 $37.61Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 Channel 207-13VT3P 194.5 19.9

1 65 Phoenix 5552A4** 206.4 21.8 $48.06 1 84 BECK 5442VT3 217.7 20.4 $41.25Channel 210-57STX 197.3 21.4 Channel 212-09STX 213.6 22.5

2 33 Phoenix 5552A4** 219.1 22.3 $31.82 2 26 BECK 5442VT3 227.6 20.2 $21.88Dekalb DKC57-50 209.1 19.4 Channel 216-96VT3P 225.5 21.3

2 33 Phoenix 5552A4** 200.8 21.2 $59.35 4 51 BECK 5442VT3 215.4 18.5 $38.33Dekalb DKC58-83 185.7 17.7 Dekalb DKC59-35 208.6 18.4





2 75 Phoenix 5552A4** 199.2 21.5 $33.33 2 120 BECK 5442VT3 213.0 20.2 $80.14Pioneer P1018AM1 192.2 20.7 Pioneer P1018AM1 199.2 20.4

2 119 Phoenix 5552A4** 199.5 21.1 $5.21 3 251 BECK 5442VT3 205.3 19.2 $41.14Pioneer P1184XR 197.6 20.4 Pioneer P1184XR 198.4 19.4

*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. *XL® is a trademark of Pioneer Hi-Bred.** Phoenix™ is a Syngenta brand distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

CORN SUMMARY (continued)

Phoenix 5552A4** Comparisons BECK 5442VT3 Comparisons

10


10




%Moist.

$/AcreAdv.

1 93 Phoenix 5832A3** 206.2 21.5 $72.19 1 110 BECK 6175AMX™* 151.8 19.4 $2.80Phoenix 5726A4** 195.2 22.8 BECK 5442VT3 151.1 19.2

1 65 Phoenix 5832A3** 212.3 21.8 $67.12 1 39 BECK 6175AMX™* 161.6 18.8 $78.49BECK 6077HR™* 199.1 20.9 BECK 6733HXR™* 149.4 20.2

1 89 Phoenix 5832A3** 216.2 21.6 $57.95 1 13 BECK 6175AMX™* 148.6 18.9 $21.24BECK 6179VT3 204.9 20.9 AgriGold A6458VT3 144.7 18.7

1 66 Phoenix 5832A3** 213.2 20.5 $53.26 1 14 BECK 6175AMX™* 150.8 21.1 $9.05BECK 6733HXR™* 206.0 22.0 AgriGold A6517VTP 150.8 22.6

1 117 Phoenix 5832A3** 214.0 21.1 $57.46 1 13 BECK 6175AMX™* 156.5 20.5 $31.22AgriGold A6573VT3P 205.0 21.9 AgriGold A6573VT3P 153.6 22.9

1 64 Phoenix 5832A3** 212.3 21.8 $90.78 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 147.2 23.0 $30.98Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 Channel 212-09STX 143.5 24.8

1 83 Phoenix 5832A3** 215.9 21.4 $18.72 1 9 BECK 6175AMX™* 168.3 19.1 $36.52Channel 212-09STX 214.1 22.4 Channel 214-14VT3P 162.5 19.6

1 36 Phoenix 5832A3** 210.5 20.2 $14.35 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 183.6 19.0 $102.14Channel 214-14VT3P 209.6 21.3 Dekalb DKC57-50 165.0 18.3

1 37 Phoenix 5832A3** 210.6 20.2 $8.44 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 187.3 18.5 $110.98Channel 216-96VT3P 210.3 21.0 Dekalb DKC57-75 166.3 17.0

1 84 Phoenix 5832A3** 216.5 21.6 $58.20 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 183.0 19.6 $64.93Dekalb DKC62-54 205.3 21.0 Dekalb DKC59-37 171.4 19.4





1 82 Phoenix 5832A3** 215.9 21.5 $73.87 1 16 BECK 6175AMX™* 154.1 19.1 $19.05Pioneer P1018AM1 201.8 20.8 Pioneer P1018AM1 151.2 19.5

1 80 Phoenix 5832A3** 215.1 21.3 $53.89 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 147.2 23.0 $65.22Pioneer P1184XR 204.4 20.5 Pioneer P1292AMX 136.0 23.5

1 36 Phoenix 5832A3** 210.5 20.2 $32.82 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 149.3 19.5 $38.35Pioneer P1615HR 207.8 22.3 Pioneer P1319AM1 143.7 20.6



Phoenix 5832A3** Comparisons BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons

11

11



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 112 BECK 6272HR™* 173.5 21.2 $58.60 2 61 Phoenix 6442A4** 149.5 20.4 $8.93BECK 5435AMX™* 162.1 20.3 Phoenix 5642A4** 147.1 19.6

2 342 BECK 6272HR™* 183.3 20.7 $30.27 2 239 Phoenix 6442A4** 180.7 20.8 $34.18Phoenix 5726A4** 179.1 21.6 Phoenix 5726A4** 174.3 20.5

2 74 BECK 6272HR™* 146.5 19.5 $18.32 2 199 Phoenix 6442A4** 190.2 20.8 $11.33Phoenix 5642A4** 143.7 19.9 BECK 6626HXR™* 188.6 21.1

2 266 BECK 6272HR™* 196.2 21.1 $3.54 2 200 Phoenix 6442A4** 191.5 21.0 $39.57BECK 6077HR™* 194.2 20.1 BECK 6733HXR™* 184.9 21.3

2 167 BECK 6272HR™* 191.2 20.3 $24.98 2 105 Phoenix 6442A4** 193.0 20.7 $10.18BECK 6733HXR™* 188.8 21.8 BECK 7988BR 192.7 21.8

2 53 BECK 6272HR™* 190.1 20.7 -$0.36 1 4 Phoenix 6442A4** 214.1 18.9 $14.36AgriGold A6458VT3 188.7 19.6 AgriGold A6517VTP 211.6 18.9

1 64 BECK 6272HR™* 198.8 21.8 $14.81 1 57 Phoenix 6442A4** 209.3 21.7 $16.78Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 AgriGold A6573VT3P 205.3 21.0

1 82 BECK 6272HR™* 203.0 21.4 $13.97 1 18 Phoenix 6442A4** 223.6 21.8 $65.08Channel 210-57STX 200.1 21.1 Channel 210-57STX 209.8 20.3

2 174 BECK 6272HR™* 199.0 21.2 $8.69 2 4 Phoenix 6442A4** 122.8 20.8 $18.82Dekalb DKC62-54 195.8 20.0 Dekalb DKC61-88 116.6 17.3



2 15 BECK 6272HR™* 242.4 22.8 $111.28 2 4 Phoenix 6442A4** 142.2 20.3 $61.13Pioneer P0891XR 217.2 19.4 Dekalb DKC66-96 130.9 19.7

2 74 BECK 6272HR™* 200.9 21.0 $67.06 1 18 Phoenix 6442A4** 223.6 21.8 $27.48Pioneer P0916XR 187.2 19.6 Pioneer P1018AM1 215.2 19.5

1 102 BECK 6272HR™* 203.8 21.2 -$1.49 2 86 Phoenix 6442A4** 191.8 20.4 $19.68Pioneer P1018AM1 203.2 20.6 Pioneer P1184XR 186.5 19.0

1 31 BECK 6272HR™* 125.8 18.8 $21.44 2 67 Phoenix 6442A4** 195.1 20.7 $64.57Pioneer P1184AM1 121.9 18.6 Pioneer P1395XR 183.2 20.3

1 5 BECK 6272HR™* 152.7 17.8 $20.87 2 82 Phoenix 6442A4** 202.1 21.1 -$1.21Pioneer P1319HR 149.3 18.0 Pioneer P1615HR 202.6 21.3

2 64 BECK 6272HR™* 195.7 20.6 $60.56 2 82 Phoenix 6442A4** 204.1 21.0 -$4.58Pioneer P1395XR 184.9 20.5 Pioneer P1745HR 205.2 21.2



BECK 6272HR™* Comparisons Phoenix 6442A4** Comparisons

12


12




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 45 BECK EX 0251 189.5 17.3 $37.20 2 202 BECK 5140HR™* 199.4 18.9 $44.93BECK 4613A4 183.6 17.7 BECK 5269HXR™* 193.6 20.4

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 $80.20 2 11 BECK 5140HR™* 194.2 17.9 $118.69AgriGold A6319VT3P 115.0 17.4 Dekalb DKC58-83 173.8 18.0

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 $72.89 2 60 BECK 5140HR™* 188.0 18.8 $22.19AgriGold A6356VT3P 116.5 17.7 Dekalb DKC62-54 185.3 19.7

1 10 BECK EX 0251 151.0 16.6 $4.72 1 66 BECK 5140HR™* 211.5 18.2 $64.56Channel 203-43VT3P 150.5 16.9 Pioneer P0413AM1 199.9 17.9

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 $38.14 2 17 BECK 5140HR™* 217.0 20.0 $11.69Channel 204-06VT3P 122.5 17.7 Pioneer P0891XR 215.1 20.1

1 3 BECK EX 0251 182.5 17.9 $23.99 2 76 BECK 5140HR™* 196.0 19.0 $63.31Dekalb DKC52-04 178.6 18.1 Pioneer P0916XR 186.4 20.1

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 -$7.21 1 12 BECK 5140HR™* 153.2 18.5 $24.01Pioneer P0533AM1 130.6 18.0 Pioneer P1184AM1 150.6 20.0



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 100 BECK 5246HR™* 184.0 18.8 $18.88 1 54 BECK 5475AMX™* 170.3 18.6 $48.28BECK 5354AMX™* 181.6 19.5 BECK 5354AMX™* 161.8 18.5

1 68 BECK 5246HR™* 203.6 18.8 $31.84 1 13 BECK 5475AMX™* 160.3 20.6 $15.67Channel 202-32STX 197.1 18.1 AgriGold A6408VT3P 156.0 19.2

1 10 BECK 5246HR™* 186.7 18.9 $86.40 1 6 BECK 5475AMX™* 151.9 20.8 $40.65Dekalb DKC58-83 171.3 18.6 AgriGold A6433VT3P 146.8 22.8

1 69 BECK 5246HR™* 203.5 18.8 $21.59 1 8 BECK 5475AMX™* 156.6 21.3 $91.54Pioneer P0413AM1 198.5 17.9 Channel 208-48VT3P 139.7 20.6

2 96 BECK 5246HR™* 215.5 19.1 $12.66 1 8 BECK 5475AMX™* 159.5 19.8 $82.87Pioneer P0717HR 212.7 18.7 Channel 209-77VT3P 145.8 20.6

3 78 BECK 5246HR™* 222.2 18.8 $34.79 1 4 BECK 5475AMX™* 187.2 16.6 $30.79Pioneer P0891XR 215.1 18.1 Dekalb DKC57-75 181.8 16.5

3 47 BECK 5246HR™* 200.0 20.0 $36.30 1 44 BECK 5475AMX™* 160.0 17.3 -$0.24Pioneer P0916XR 195.0 21.0 Dekalb DKC62-97 161.6 18.7

1 7 BECK 5246HR™* 137.5 17.6 $7.52 1 3 BECK 5475AMX™* 149.0 17.3 $48.24Pioneer P1018AM1 138.4 19.9 Pioneer P0832AMX 140.5 17.1


BECK 5246HR™* Comparisons BECK 5475AMX™* Comparisons


BECK EX 0251 (5114) Comparisons BECK 5140HR™* Comparisons

14

13




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 28 BECK 5354AMX™* 187.3 19.1 $73.50 1 96 BECK 5435AMX™* 168.5 20.3 $2.62BECK 4817HXR™* 172.8 17.7 BECK 5354AMX™* 167.1 19.5

1 96 BECK 5354AMX™* 188.4 19.5 $31.06 2 20 BECK 5435AMX™* 145.4 19.0 $6.58BECK 5354HXR™* 184.0 20.3 BECK 6733HXR™* 146.5 21.2

2 68 BECK 5354AMX™* 204.9 19.5 $33.58 1 18 BECK 5435AMX™* 207.2 19.7 $27.22Channel 202-32STX 197.1 18.1 Channel 202-32STX 199.5 17.6

2 45 BECK 5354AMX™* 196.4 17.4 $68.44 1 3 BECK 5435AMX™* 185.6 17.6 $8.33Pioneer P0413AM1 184.1 17.0 Dekalb DKC57-67 182.9 16.6

1 68 BECK 5354AMX™* 204.9 19.5 $23.90 1 18 BECK 5435AMX™* 207.2 19.7 $104.05Pioneer P0461XR 198.5 17.9 Pioneer P0461XR 187.8 18.8

1 80 BECK 5354AMX™* 193.1 19.6 $16.24 1 62 BECK 5435AMX™* 187.7 20.8 -$6.63Pioneer P0717HR 189.2 18.8 Pioneer P0717HR 186.5 19.0

1 68 BECK 5354AMX™* 204.9 19.5 $86.49 1 7 BECK 5435AMX™* 171.3 23.1 $26.76Pioneer 35F48 188.2 18.3 Pioneer P0916XR 167.1 23.6



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 168 BECK 5509A3 172.4 19.8 $7.02 1 9 BECK 5509A3 189.2 19.4 $54.28Phoenix 5552A4** 172.5 20.9 Dekalb DKC57-50 178.1 18.1

1 150 BECK 5509A3 182.4 19.9 $10.84 1 6 BECK 5509A3 187.3 19.1 $106.49BECK 6179VT3 180.5 19.9 Dekalb DKC57-75 166.3 17.0

1 12 BECK 5509A3 153.7 20.4 $11.74 1 9 BECK 5509A3 192.5 20.0 $60.06AgriGold A6517VT3P 153.8 22.4 Dekalb DKC59-37 181.2 19.4

1 113 BECK 5509A3 206.5 20.4 $34.20 1 64 BECK 5509A3 207.0 20.8 $33.97AgriGold A6573VT3P 203.2 22.3 Dekalb DKC59-64 200.3 20.3

1 52 BECK 5509A3 196.8 21.0 $31.46 1 172 BECK 5509A3 197.2 19.8 -$2.31Channel 207-13VT3P 189.5 19.7 Dekalb DKC62-97 198.3 20.3

1 64 BECK 5509A3 207.0 20.8 $69.24 1 40 BECK 5509A3 228.1 20.2 $38.04Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 Dekalb DKC63-07 223.3 21.4

1 83 BECK 5509A3 210.1 20.5 $62.17 1 115 BECK 5509A3 205.4 20.3 $39.47Channel 210-57STX 200.0 21.1 Pioneer P1018AM1 198.6 20.4

1 92 BECK 5509A3 206.1 20.5 $2.20 1 8 BECK 5509A3 142.8 18.7 $43.29Channel 212-09STX 208.8 22.6 Pioneer P1319AM1 136.7 20.2



BECK 5354AMX™* Comparisons BECK 5435AMX™* Comparisons

BECK 5509A3 Comparisons

13

14




%Moist.

$/AcreAdv.

2 15 Phoenix 5642A4** 166.5 19.8 $86.66 2 193 Phoenix 5726A4** 191.2 21.4 $18.76BECK 6077HR™* 151.0 19.5 BECK 5435HXR™* 185.9 19.9

2 12 Phoenix 5642A4** 189.8 21.0 $24.62 2 18 Phoenix 5726A4** 210.7 23.2 $88.56Dekalb DKC57-50 181.6 18.0 AgriGold A6309SS 189.5 19.3

1 8 Phoenix 5642A4** 182.4 21.8 $12.39 1 64 Phoenix 5726A4** 200.2 23.0 $13.08Dekalb DKC59-37 177.3 19.5 Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3

2 14 Phoenix 5642A4** 200.5 21.3 $65.52 1 64 Phoenix 5726A4** 200.2 23.0 $2.99Dekalb DKC61-06 188.1 20.7 Channel 210-57STX 197.4 21.4

1 8 Phoenix 5642A4** 218.6 20.6 $53.77 2 194 Phoenix 5726A4** 192.4 21.4 -$12.91Pioneer P1018XR 208.1 19.9 Dekalb DKC62-54 192.1 19.5

2 21 Phoenix 5642A4** 196.3 19.9 $6.01 2 93 Phoenix 5726A4** 197.3 21.2 $47.22Pioneer P1184XR 194.7 19.5 Pioneer P0916XR 186.7 19.5

2 17 Phoenix 5642A4** 180.7 21.8 -$4.90 2 66 Phoenix 5726A4** 194.5 20.4 $46.79Pioneer P1395XR 180.8 21.2 Pioneer P1395XR 186.4 20.5



%Moist.

$/AcreAdv.

1 38 BECK 6175wx™* 224.2 21.2 $104.14 2 11 BECK 6187wx™* 213.9 19.4 $160.93BECK 5442VT3 231.9 20.2 BECK 6179VT3 211.5 19.1

1 20 BECK 6175wx™* 225.7 21.0 $187.64 2 11 BECK 6187wx™* 204.8 19.6 $180.16AgriGold A6573VT3P 221.4 21.6 AgriGold A6533VT3 199.9 20.7

1 20 BECK 6175wx™* 225.7 21.0 $137.64 1 19 BECK 6187wx™* 216.0 22.4 $100.62Channel 212-09STX 230.6 21.8 Dekalb DKC62-97 222.8 21.0

1 39 BECK 6175wx™* 221.0 21.3 $141.95 1 19 BECK 6187wx™* 223.6 22.4 $107.13Dekalb DKC62-97 223.1 21.2 Dekalb DKC63-44 207.0 22.7

1 18 BECK 6175wx™* 222.5 21.5 $108.21 1 28 BECK 6187wx™* 221.3 21.3 $149.41Dekalb DKC63-44 207.0 22.7 Dekalb DKC63-84 220.4 20.1

1 20 BECK 6175wx™* 225.7 21.0 $121.35 1 3 BECK 6187wx™* 161.4 23.4 $0.41Pioneer P0916EHR 205.2 19.9 Pioneer P0832Ewx 159.0 21.1

1 39 BECK 6175wx™* 221.0 21.3 $156.62 1 19 BECK 6187wx™* 216.0 22.4 $154.11Pioneer P1018AM1 218.8 20.1 Pioneer P1018AM1 212.0 20.1

1 38 BECK 6175wx™* 224.2 21.2 $139.76 1 38 BECK 6187wx™* 217.3 19.3 $190.14Pioneer P1395AM1 227.4 21.3 Pioneer P1615HR 214.1 21.6



Phoenix 5642A4** Comparisons Phoenix 5726A4** Comparisons

BECK 6175wx™* Comparisons BECK 6187wx™* Comparisons

13

15



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 22 BECK 6077AM™* 213.4 19.3 $27.29 2 28 BECK 6543HR™* 208.5 24.0 $53.12BECK 6626HXR™* 213.1 22.3 BECK 6077HR™* 196.5 22.3

1 64 BECK 6077AM™* 197.1 20.4 $16.28 1 16 BECK 6543HR™* 220.6 23.1 $71.48Channel 209-69VT3P 194.1 20.3 BECK 6179VT3 206.3 22.1

1 82 BECK 6077AM™* 202.4 20.2 $20.30 1 10 BECK 6543HR™* 221.0 23.3 $10.79Channel 210-57STX 200.1 21.1 BECK 6272HR™* 217.5 22.3

1 3 BECK 6077AM™* 204.0 20.1 $44.17 2 24 BECK 6543HR™* 206.2 24.0 $92.27Dekalb DKC59-37 194.2 18.6 BECK 6733HXR™* 191.9 25.7

1 10 BECK 6077AM™* 160.8 18.7 -$8.68 1 10 BECK 6543HR™* 221.0 23.3 $13.30Dekalb DKC61-88 161.3 17.8 Phoenix 6948A3** 219.4 23.8

1 20 BECK 6077AM™* 226.0 19.5 $25.45 1 28 BECK 6543HR™* 218.3 23.3 $46.80Dekalb DKC63-07 223.9 21.0 AgriGold A6573VT3P 208.1 22.1

1 89 BECK 6077AM™* 197.4 20.0 $6.44 1 30 BECK 6543HR™* 215.8 23.3 $40.52Pioneer P1018AM1 197.1 20.6 Dekalb DKC62-97 204.7 20.7

1 22 BECK 6077AM™* 219.3 19.5 $38.07 1 20 BECK 6543HR™* 212.3 23.3 $97.19Pioneer P1184AMRW 212.2 19.2 Pioneer P1018AM1 189.8 19.6



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

3 160 BECK 6626HXR™* 206.0 21.9 $11.91 1 57 Phoenix 6948A3** 154.6 21.4 $43.08BECK 6179VT3 200.6 19.6 Phoenix 5726A4** 145.9 20.4

3 213 BECK 6626HXR™* 199.9 21.4 $27.74 1 83 Phoenix 6948A3** 195.0 21.9 $31.84BECK 6733HXR™* 195.4 21.7 BECK 6733HXR™* 188.4 21.2

1 39 BECK 6626HXR™* 226.6 22.7 $31.87 1 57 Phoenix 6948A3** 203.3 22.3 $0.84AgriGold A6573VT3P 219.8 22.0 AgriGold A6573VT3P 201.0 20.8

1 20 BECK 6626HXR™* 224.8 22.6 $17.51 1 20 Phoenix 6948A3** 224.0 23.5 $8.16Channel 210-57STX 218.7 20.7 Dekalb DKC62-54 218.6 21.0

3 148 BECK 6626HXR™* 204.4 21.5 $13.43 1 20 Phoenix 6948A3** 224.0 23.5 $53.99Dekalb DKC62-54 198.5 19.0 Dekalb DKC63-42 211.7 21.8

2 74 BECK 6626HXR™* 212.2 22.3 -$7.31 1 19 Phoenix 6948A3** 217.2 22.2 $4.02Dekalb DKC62-97 210.5 20.3 Pioneer P1018AM1 212.1 19.3

3 71 BECK 6626HXR™* 219.6 22.2 $14.60 1 21 Phoenix 6948A3** 208.1 21.9 -$2.33Dekalb DKC63-42 214.4 20.5 Pioneer P1184XR 204.3 19.0



BECK 6077AM™* Comparisons BECK 6543HR™* Comparisons

BECK 6626HXR™* Comparisons Phoenix 6948A3** Comparisons

16


16




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 22 BECK EX 0251 184.7 16.7 $57.75 1 52 Phoenix 5385A3** 186.5 18.8 $93.99BECK 4613A4 175.4 17.2 BECK 5354AMXTM* 171.1 19.6

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 $72.89 2 53 Phoenix 5385A3** 182.5 20.0 $107.16AgriGold A6356VT3P 116.5 17.7 BECK 5435AMXTM* 163.7 20.0

1 10 BECK EX 0251 151.2 16.2 $9.49 1 20 Phoenix 5385A3** 203.9 21.0 $99.41Channel 202-32STX 150.4 17.0 Channel 209-69VT3P 186.6 21.2

1 9 BECK EX 0251 148.4 16.2 $4.12 1 21 Phoenix 5385A3** 203.3 21.0 $14.07Channel 203-43VT3P 148.0 16.5 Channel 210-57STX 202.1 21.9

1 6 BECK EX 0251 128.2 16.7 $38.14 1 20 Phoenix 5385A3** 203.9 21.0 $30.56Channel 204-06VT3P 122.5 17.7 Dekalb DKC59-64 198.5 21.0

1 9 BECK EX 0251 190.7 16.7 $35.43 2 33 Phoenix 5385A3** 185.7 20.5 $17.93Pioneer P0717HR 185.9 17.7 Pioneer P1018AM1 182.8 20.7

1 28 BECK EX 0251 193.4 17.3 $19.50 1 9 Phoenix 5385A3** 161.2 17.0 $30.44Pioneer 35F48 190.7 17.8 Pioneer P1184AM1 156.4 17.4



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 29 BECK 5475AMXTM* 171.3 17.8 $66.96 4 235 BECK 5442VT3 201.4 19.4 $60.11BECK 5354AMXTM* 159.4 17.5 BECK 6179VT3 190.5 19.1

1 6 BECK 5475AMXTM* 163.9 20.3 $25.24 2 56 BECK 5442VT3 228.7 19.9 $58.99AgriGold A6478VT3P 159.8 20.6 AgriGold A6533VT3 219.9 20.9

1 8 BECK 5475AMXTM* 159.5 19.8 $82.87 1 42 BECK 5442VT3 222.5 20.5 $93.14Channel 209-77VT3 145.8 20.6 AgriGold A6573VT3P 208.6 22.2

1 6 BECK 5475AMXTM* 202.4 17.8 -$5.32 1 29 BECK 5442VT3 230.2 21.1 $145.87Dekalb DKC57-50 203.6 18.0 Channel 212-09STX 204.7 21.3

1 37 BECK 5475AMXTM* 169.3 17.4 $7.86 2 29 BECK 5442VT3 185.7 19.4 $32.19Dekalb DKC62-97 169.7 18.9 Dekalb DKC61-88 179.2 18.7

1 3 BECK 5475AMXTM* 149.0 17.3 $48.24 2 17 BECK 5442VT3 178.3 19.1 $26.71Pioneer P0832AMX 140.5 17.1 Dekalb DKC62-09 172.8 18.4

1 3 BECK 5475AMXTM* 156.9 20.1 $44.60 2 46 BECK 5442VT3 216.7 20.3 $111.62Pioneer P0916AM1 149.7 20.7 Pioneer P1018AM1 196.8 20.1

1 7 BECK 5475AMXTM* 144.8 16.2 $131.39 1 33 BECK 5442VT3 236.3 19.7 $63.56Pioneer P1184AM1 123.7 17.8 Pioneer P1395AM1 226.6 20.6


Northern and Central Illinois Region 1 Performance Summary

BECK EX 0251 (5114) Comparisons Phoenix 5385A3** Comparisons

BECK 5475AMX™* Comparisons BECK 5442VT3 Comparisons

14

17




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 44 BECK 5509A3 155.5 19.0 $27.92 2 66 Phoenix 5552A4** 168.5 21.2 $26.00Phoenix 5642A4** 151.8 20.1 Phoenix 5642A4** 163.9 21.2

1 20 BECK 5509A3 200.2 22.1 $69.66 2 44 Phoenix 5552A4** 188.3 20.3 $5.07Channel 209-69VT3P 186.6 21.2 AgriGold A6458VT3 186.1 19.3

1 16 BECK 5509A3 201.4 18.7 $13.36 1 20 Phoenix 5552A4** 200.2 23.0 $62.45Channel 214-14VT3P 198.8 18.5 Channel 209-69VT3P 186.6 21.2

1 6 BECK 5509A3 207.0 18.6 $82.06 2 30 Phoenix 5552A4** 195.4 20.8 $8.20Dekalb DKC58-83 194.5 19.9 Channel 210-57STX 193.0 20.1

1 35 BECK 5509A3 207.6 19.5 $5.92 2 57 Phoenix 5552A4** 203.9 21.8 $0.37Dekalb DKC63-84 207.0 19.8 Dekalb DKC62-54 201.4 20.1

1 49 BECK 5509A3 195.0 20.6 $2.78 2 29 Phoenix 5552A4** 188.9 22.0 $0.77Pioneer P1018AM1 194.1 20.3 Pioneer P1018AM1 186.9 20.6

1 8 BECK 5509A3 156.3 17.5 $47.70 2 29 Phoenix 5552A4** 193.6 21.7 $49.82Pioneer P1184AM1 149.0 18.4 Pioneer P1395XR 184.1 21.2



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 19 Phoenix 5642A4** 154.1 19.8 $49.08 1 40 BECK 6175AMX™* 195.6 19.5 $33.24BECK 5354AMX™* 142.8 17.1 BECK 6733HXR™* 191.8 21.0

2 37 Phoenix 5642A4** 154.1 19.9 $42.93 1 20 BECK 6175AMX™* 200.4 21.3 $77.20Phoenix 5726A4** 147.4 20.7 Channel 209-69VT3P 186.6 21.2

1 59 Phoenix 5642A4** 158.3 20.3 $35.90 1 29 BECK 6175AMX™* 207.0 20.9 $16.30BECK 6626AMX 153.5 21.7 Channel 210-57STX 204.7 21.3

2 14 Phoenix 5642A4** 165.2 19.7 $9.26 1 33 BECK 6175AMX™* 175.7 19.7 $1.71BECK 6733HXRTM* 164.5 20.5 Dekalb DKC61-88 175.4 19.7

2 11 Phoenix 5642A4** 197.4 21.1 $19.85 1 18 BECK 6175AMX™* 164.5 19.2 -$3.78Dekalb DKC57-50 189.6 17.9 Dekalb DKC62-09 164.7 18.8

2 9 Phoenix 5642A4** 207.1 20.8 $9.78 1 93 BECK 6175AMX™* 188.3 20.0 -$0.39Dekalb DKC58-83 199.6 16.7 Dekalb DKC62-97 188.5 20.1

1 8 Phoenix 5642A4** 182.4 21.8 $12.39 1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 162.1 17.6 $80.70Dekalb DKC59-37 177.3 19.5 Pioneer P1184AM1 149.0 18.4

1 15 Phoenix 5642A4** 192.1 20.4 $18.82 1 8 BECK 6175AMX™* 147.2 23.0 $65.22Pioneer P1184XR 187.6 19.5 Pioneer P1292AMX 136.0 23.5


Northern and Central Illinois Region 1 Performance Summary (continued)

BECK 5509A3 Comparisons Phoenix 5552A4** Comparisons

Phoenix 5642A4** Comparisons BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons

14

18




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 14 BECK 4536A3 175.0 18.2 $42.95 2 55 BECK 5140HR™* 201.0 20.2 $87.91BECK 4613A4 169.2 19.6 BECK 5354HXR™* 187.4 21.6

4 41 BECK 4536A3 210.4 18.3 $47.24 2 6 BECK 5140HR™* 155.8 21.3 $53.21BECK 5354HXR™* 206.8 21.5 AgriGold A6309SS 146.9 21.8

1 14 BECK 4536A3 203.0 17.6 -$8.90 1 14 BECK 5140HR™* 217.1 18.6 $64.14Channel 202-32STX 206.1 18.7 Channel 202-32STX 206.1 18.7

1 12 BECK 4536A3 200.7 17.8 $10.32 1 6 BECK 5140HR™* 214.2 18.8 $79.89Channel 207-13VT3P 202.7 20.5 Channel 207-13VT3P 202.7 20.5

1 14 BECK 4536A3 203.0 17.6 $34.46 2 6 BECK 5140HR™* 190.2 19.6 $50.78Pioneer P0413AM1 198.7 18.8 Dekalb DKC61-06 183.5 21.3

1 14 BECK 4536A3 203.0 17.6 $51.29 1 14 BECK 5140HR™* 217.1 18.6 $107.50Pioneer 35F48 195.5 18.6 Pioneer P0413AM1 198.7 18.8

3 20 BECK 4536A3 224.4 17.4 $83.49 2 16 BECK 5140HR™* 196.6 21.8 $108.38Pioneer 35K04 213.1 19.5 Pioneer P0916XR 179.9 23.8



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

4 101 BECK 5246HR™* 200.7 19.6 $43.59 1 24 BECK 5475AM™* 181.5 19.8 $45.72BECK 4817HXRTM* 191.6 18.5 BECK 5269HXR™* 174.1 20.3

4 106 BECK 5246HR™* 198.0 19.2 $14.10 1 28 BECK 5475AM™* 182.5 20.1 $70.51BECK 5354HXRTM* 196.5 19.9 BECK 5354AMX™* 170.6 20.5

2 24 BECK 5246HR™* 167.6 23.0 $31.07 1 33 BECK 5475AM™* 175.2 20.1 -$3.60BECK 5435AMXTM* 161.8 22.8 BECK 5442VT3 176.7 20.8

2 14 BECK 5246HR™* 183.8 18.6 $8.63 1 14 BECK 5475AM™* 213.4 20.0 $30.89AgriGold A6309SS 182.3 18.6 Channel 202-32STX 206.1 18.7

1 14 BECK 5246HR™* 201.0 20.1 $8.33 1 12 BECK 5475AM™* 210.8 20.1 $49.38Pioneer P0413AM1 198.7 19.5 Channel 207-13VT3P 202.7 20.5

3 29 BECK 5246HR™* 218.7 23.4 $60.38 1 5 BECK 5475AM™* 176.3 20.9 $36.31Pioneer P0891XR 208.9 24.1 Dekalb DKC62-54 172.2 22.8

2 15 BECK 5246HR™* 173.2 19.9 -$2.13 1 14 BECK 5475AM™* 213.4 20.0 $74.25Pioneer P0916XR 174.8 20.9 Pioneer P0413AM1 198.7 18.8

1 14 BECK 5246HR™* 201.0 18.6 $33.22 1 10 BECK 5475AM™* 144.0 21.4 $41.72Pioneer 35F48 195.5 18.8 Pioneer P1184AM1 136.9 21.7


N. Indiana, S. Michigan, NW. OhioRegion 2 Performance Summary

BECK 4536A3 Comparisons BECK 5140HR™* Comparisons

BECK 5246HR™* Comparisons BECK 5475AM™* Comparisons

14

19




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 75 Phoenix 5385A3** 201.9 22.1 $56.87 3 13 BECK 5442VT3 203.0 19.9 $19.62BECK 5354HXR™* 191.5 21.9 AgriGold A6476VT3 199.7 20.0

2 9 Phoenix 5385A3** 217.1 21.4 $56.02 1 10 BECK 5442VT3 241.3 20.2 $198.60AgriGold A6458VT3 209.4 22.9 AgriGold A6573VT3P 209.8 22.5

2 21 Phoenix 5385A3** 212.0 21.8 $14.23 2 8 BECK 5442VT3 209.7 20.1 $69.90Channel 207-13VT3P 207.7 20.6 Dekalb DKC61-88 196.6 19.5

1 8 Phoenix 5385A3** 220.0 22.7 $23.32 2 6 BECK 5442VT3 230.1 20.8 $27.34Channel 209-69VT3P 211.0 19.5 Dekalb DKC62-09 224.8 20.5

1 12 Phoenix 5385A3** 203.0 21.1 $44.75 4 27 BECK 5442VT3 233.0 21.3 $100.19Pioneer P0413AM1 192.1 18.9 Pioneer P0891XR 212.7 19.6

1 3 Phoenix 5385A3** 120.5 18.4 $55.98 2 17 BECK 5442VT3 236.6 20.3 $144.45Pioneer P0832AM1 110.1 17.5 Pioneer P1018AM1 212.4 21.1




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 24 Phoenix 5552A4** 172.1 23.2 $33.53 1 12 BECK 6175AMXTM* 193.4 20.2 $100.98BECK 5435AMX™* 163.5 21.0 BECK 5354HXRTM* 174.8 19.5

1 8 Phoenix 5552A4** 208.5 23.9 $40.15 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 221.6 22.2 $68.74Channel 207-13VT3P 196.3 20.4 AgriGold A6573VT3P 209.8 22.5

1 8 Phoenix 5552A4** 213.3 23.4 -$3.08 1 8 BECK 6175AMX™* 224.0 22.0 $51.96Channel 210-57STX 213.7 23.3 Channel 209-69VT3P 211.0 19.5

2 2 Phoenix 5552A4** 200.9 20.4 $157.28 1 8 BECK 6175AMX™* 224.0 22.0 $25.57Dekalb DKC58-83 171.3 18.8 Channel 212-09STX 221.5 23.3


2 10 Phoenix 5552A4** 222.9 26.5 $1.92 1 4 BECK 6175AMX™* 128.2 19.0 $97.29Pioneer P0717HR 214.2 21.2 Pioneer P0832AM1 110.1 17.5




N. Indiana, S. Michigan, NW. Ohio Region 2 Performance Summary (continued)


BECK 5552A4** Comparisons BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons

14

20




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 46 Phoenix 5385A3** 201.4 19.5 $46.74 4 121 BECK 5442VT3 206.5 18.5 $44.09BECK 5354HXR™* 193.5 19.7 BECK 6179VT3 199.4 18.9

2 8 Phoenix 5385A3** 188.0 20.3 $35.47 3 10 BECK 5442VT3 204.0 19.5 $67.50AgriGold A6458VT3 181.0 19.7 AgriGold A6458VT3 192.2 19.5

1 15 Phoenix 5385A3** 202.8 19.9 $65.64 1 21 BECK 5442VT3 204.7 20.2 $53.06AgriGold A6573VT3P 193.6 21.6 AgriGold A6573VT3P 197.6 21.8

1 19 Phoenix 5385A3** 193.3 19.8 $16.44 1 14 BECK 5442VT3 198.4 20.0 $15.54Channel 207-13VT3P 188.7 18.5 Channel 209-69VT3P 195.4 19.8

1 14 Phoenix 5385A3** 202.0 20.1 $34.96 4 27 BECK 5442VT3 207.8 19.7 -$2.88Channel 212-09STX 196.0 20.2 Dekalb DKC59-64 207.0 18.8





% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 6 BECK 5475AMX™* 212.4 19.2 $45.75 1 46 BECK 5509A3 193.0 20.1 $64.52BECK 5354HXR™* 206.0 20.3 BECK 5442VT3 181.8 20.2

1 9 BECK 5475AMX™* 125.5 19.3 $83.24 1 26 BECK 5509A3 206.2 20.2 $61.12BECK 5435AMX™* 111.2 19.6 BECK 6179VT3 195.6 20.3

1 5 BECK 5475AMX™* 169.4 20.9 $8.72 1 13 BECK 5509A3 221.2 20.1 $18.34Phoenix 5552A4** 171.0 23.5 AgriGold A6533VT3 220.3 21.6

1 4 BECK 5475AMX™* 221.4 19.8 $39.18 1 21 BECK 5509A3 221.2 20.0 $148.75Channel 202-32STX 212.6 18.5 AgriGold A6573VT3P 197.6 21.8

1 4 BECK 5475AMX™* 121.5 19.8 -$1.71 1 19 BECK 5509A3 220.3 19.9 $102.20Dekalb DKC62-09 121.8 19.8 Channel 212-09STX 205.7 22.2

1 4 BECK 5475AMX™* 221.4 19.8 $21.61 1 4 BECK 5509A3 129.5 20.4 $40.84Pioneer P0413AM1 216.1 18.8 Dekalb DKC62-09 121.8 19.8

1 4 BECK 5475AMX™* 221.4 19.8 $2.23 1 28 BECK 5509A3 218.4 20.1 $39.56Pioneer P0717HR 220.7 19.6 Dekalb DKC62-97 212.2 20.6

1 2 BECK 5475AMX™* 125.2 20.6 $129.34 1 22 BECK 5509A3 220.9 20.2 $71.35Pioneer P1319AM1 104.1 22.9 Pioneer P1018AM1 209.1 20.7


Central Indiana Region 3 Performance Summary


BECK 5475AMX™* Comparisons BECK 5509A3 Comparisons

14

21




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 29 Phoenix 5552A4** 204.1 21.5 $22.75 1 22 BECK 6077AM™* 169.3 20.2 $55.85BECK 6179VT3 198.1 20.1 BECK 5435AMX™* 159.6 20.3

1 7 Phoenix 5552A4** 214.5 20.5 $92.75 1 30 BECK 6077AM™* 172.7 20.3 $40.51AgriGold A6458VT3 196.1 19.0 Phoenix 5726A4** 168.3 22.6

1 16 Phoenix 5552A4** 203.1 21.3 $49.87 1 19 BECK 6077AM™* 209.3 20.1 $90.33AgriGold A6573VT3P 195.1 21.9 AgriGold A6573VT3P 195.5 21.6

1 14 Phoenix 5552A4** 201.1 21.3 $22.77 1 18 BECK 6077AM™* 211.2 20.3 $44.94Channel 212-09STX 198.9 22.6 Channel 210-57STX 203.3 20.3

2 26 Phoenix 5552A4** 209.1 20.5 $61.06 1 14 BECK 6077AM™* 207.7 20.3 $14.76Dekalb DKC62-54 197.1 19.6 Dekalb DKC59-64 204.1 19.6

1 14 Phoenix 5552A4** 201.1 21.3 $12.87 1 20 BECK 6077AM™* 205.8 20.2 $2.73Pioneer P1018AM1 198.4 21.0 Dekalb DKC62-97 205.9 20.6

2 19 Phoenix 5552A4** 204.7 20.9 $17.65 1 18 BECK 6077AM™* 211.2 20.3 $34.83Pioneer P1184XR 201.3 20.7 Pioneer P1018AM1 205.8 20.8



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 27 BECK 6175AMX™* 176.5 21.8 $9.59 2 62 BECK 6272HR™* 190.0 20.9 $22.23Phoenix 5552A4** 174.3 21.4 Phoenix 5726A4** 187.8 22.2

1 25 BECK 6175AMX™* 184.5 21.0 $11.70 2 43 BECK 6272HR™* 205.1 21.0 $24.51Phoenix 6442A4** 183.6 21.9 BECK 6179VT3 199.5 20.1

1 23 BECK 6175AMX™* 202.1 22.2 $16.13 1 23 BECK 6272HR™* 207.4 20.8 $57.49AgriGold A6573VT3P 198.8 21.9 AgriGold A6573VT3P 198.8 21.9

1 3 BECK 6175AMX™* 134.9 24.8 $9.29 1 19 BECK 6272HR™* 205.1 20.6 $9.76Dekalb DKC61-88 131.4 22.9 Channel 212-09STX 205.7 22.2

1 18 BECK 6175AMX™* 200.5 22.2 $4.89 2 31 BECK 6272HR™* 210.8 20.6 $59.59Dekalb DKC62-54 197.1 20.4 Dekalb DKC62-54 198.9 19.6

1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 179.7 22.5 $22.82 2 14 BECK 6272HR™* 207.3 19.7 $63.58Pioneer P0717HR 171.7 19.3 Pioneer P0916XR 194.4 18.4

1 14 BECK 6175AMX™* 193.9 22.2 $25.05 1 6 BECK 6272HR™* 222.7 20.4 $86.24Pioneer P0916XR 187.3 20.6 Pioneer P1184AMRW 206.8 19.9

1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 210.6 20.9 $13.25 2 13 BECK 6272HR™* 203.3 20.5 $95.64Pioneer P1184AMRW 206.8 19.9 Pioneer P1395XR 186.2 20.3


Central Indiana Region 3 Performance Summary (continued)

Phoenix 5552A4** Comparisons BECK 6077AM™* Comparisons

BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons BECK 6272HR™* Comparisons

14

22




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 8 BECK 5140HR™* 203.7 20.1 $94.87 1 6 BECK 5475AM™* 195.1 21.2 $24.79BECK 5354HXR™* 188.5 21.2 BECK 5354HXR™* 191.8 22.0

1 4 BECK 5140HR™* 223.0 19.4 $197.83 1 6 BECK 5475AM™* 195.1 21.2 $81.56Channel 202-32STX 189.1 19.9 Channel 202-32STX 179.4 20.2

1 4 BECK 5140HR™* 223.0 19.4 $62.11 1 6 BECK 5475AM™* 140.7 17.2 $78.83Channel 207-13VT3P 214.7 21.1 Dekalb DKC62-58 126.7 16.7

1 4 BECK 5140HR™* 223.0 19.4 $121.10 1 6 BECK 5475AM™* 195.1 21.2 $40.50Pioneer P0413AM1 201.0 18.8 Pioneer P0413AM1 185.7 19.5

2 4 BECK 5140HR™* 231.0 18.5 $210.79 1 3 BECK 5475AM™* 208.9 18.5 -$5.34Pioneer P0717HR 194.0 18.2 Pioneer P1018AM1 211.0 19.3

2 4 BECK 5140HR™* 208.3 18.8 $168.13 1 3 BECK 5475AM™* 140.7 17.2 -$7.06Pioneer P0916XR 179.8 19.4 Pioneer P1184AM1 142.8 18.1

1 4 BECK 5140HR™* 223.0 18.9 $137.14 1 6 BECK 5475AM™* 195.1 21.2 $148.53Pioneer 35F48 200.1 19.6 Pioneer 35F48 167.4 20.0



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 9 BECK 5435HXR™* 189.0 22.5 $81.91 2 21 Phoenix 5726A4** 195.4 23.1 $36.05BECK 5354HXR™* 174.0 22.2 BECK 5716A3 188.8 23.0

1 8 BECK 5435HXR™* 192.5 22.6 $26.29 1 8 Phoenix 5726A4** 198.1 25.3 $36.23Channel 207-13VT3P 187.4 22.3 Channel 207-13VT3P 187.4 22.3

1 10 BECK 5435HXR™* 199.5 22.4 $45.60 1 10 Phoenix 5726A4** 206.0 25.1 $59.78Channel 209-69VT3P 191.5 22.5 Channel 209-69VT3P 191.5 22.5

1 10 BECK 5435HXR™* 199.5 22.4 $82.92 1 10 Phoenix 5726A4** 206.0 25.1 $97.09Channel 210-57STX 186.3 23.6 Channel 210-57STX 186.3 23.6

1 10 BECK 5435HXR™* 199.5 22.4 $0.94 1 12 Phoenix 5726A4** 195.7 24.9 $2.56Dekalb DKC59-64 198.2 21.6 Pioneer P1018AM1 192.3 22.8

1 10 BECK 5435HXR™* 199.5 22.4 -$1.83 2 14 Phoenix 5726A4** 210.8 24.6 $29.78Dekalb DKC62-54 199.4 22.1 Pioneer P1184XR 201.6 22.0

1 11 BECK 5435HXR™* 193.4 21.7 -$4.23 2 8 Phoenix 5726A4** 207.3 23.2 $108.65Pioneer P1018AM1 195.4 22.6 Pioneer P1615HR 187.8 23.2

1 10 BECK 5435HXR™* 199.5 22.4 $18.94 2 8 Phoenix 5726A4** 207.3 23.2 $44.74Pioneer P1184XR 196.4 22.6 Pioneer P1745HR 198.7 22.8


West Central Ohio Region 4 Performance Summary

BECK 5140HR™* Comparisons BECK 5475AM™* Comparisons


14

23




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 7 BECK 6077HR™* 221.1 20.6 $59.00 1 5 BECK 6175AMX™* 151.2 23.0 $69.74BECK 5435HXR™* 211.6 21.2 Phoenix 5642A4 139.2 23.5

1 6 BECK 6077HR™* 249.0 20.4 $87.61 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 197.0 22.7 $29.22BECK 6188Bt1 237.6 22.8 BECK 5435AMXTM* 191.5 22.5

1 30 BECK 6077HR™* 203.8 20.8 $25.75 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 197.0 22.7 $29.22AgriGold A6573VT3P 202.4 23.0 Channel 209-69VT3P 191.5 22.5

1 24 BECK 6077HR™* 199.3 20.9 $31.72 1 12 BECK 6175AMX™* 200.9 22.8 $89.02Channel 209-69VT3P 193.7 20.9 Channel 210-57STX 185.5 23.2

1 24 BECK 6077HR™* 199.3 20.9 $37.38 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 194.9 22.6 $22.93Dekalb DKC62-54 192.7 20.9 Dekalb DKC63-42 191.9 23.4

1 6 BECK 6077HR™* 249 20.4 $56.91 1 13 BECK 6175AMX™* 197.5 22.1 $17.97Dekalb DKC63-07 242.4 22.4 Pioneer P1018AM1 194.3 22.1

1 32 BECK 6077HR™* 199.7 20.6 $7.75 1 12 BECK 6175AMX™* 200.9 22.8 $33.21Pioneer P1018AM1 199.6 21.5 Pioneer P1184XR 194.4 22.4



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 14 BECK 6272HRTM* 208.9 23.2 $42.28 2 14 Phoenix 6442A4** 217.3 23.7 $84.73BECK 6733HXR™* 203.8 24.9 BECK 6733HXR™* 203.8 24.9

1 10 BECK 6272HRTM* 207.8 24.5 $74.66 2 17 Phoenix 6442A4** 207.7 23.4 $19.99Channel 209-69VT3P 191.5 22.5 AgriGold A6533VT3 201.5 21.6

1 12 BECK 6272HRTM* 211.8 23.9 $140.61 1 8 Phoenix 6442A4** 226.0 23.6 $57.33Channel 210-57STX 185.5 23.2 AgriGold A6573VT3P 214.6 22.9

1 12 BECK 6272HRTM* 211.8 23.9 $15.05 2 9 Phoenix 6442A4** 194.1 22.7 $59.59Channel 212-09STX 210.3 24.7 Channel 214-14VT3P 182.4 21.9

1 8 BECK 6272HRTM* 211.8 22.0 $10.95 1 6 Phoenix 6442A4** 225.2 24.2 $33.36Channel 214-14VT3P 210.3 22.3 Channel 216-96VT3P 216.2 22.3

1 10 BECK 6272HRTM* 218.1 24.0 $25.84 1 4 Phoenix 6442A4** 250.2 23.8 $220.81Dekalb DKC62-97 211.3 22.6 Dekalb DKC62-97 208.0 22.2

2 10 BECK 6272HRTM* 208.4 23.5 $45.90 2 10 Phoenix 6442A4** 222.6 23.7 $123.08Pioneer P1615HR 200.0 23.4 Pioneer P1615HR 200.0 23.4

2 10 BECK 6272HRTM* 208.4 23.5 $18.67 2 10 Phoenix 6442A4** 222.6 23.7 $95.84Pioneer P1745HR 204.6 23.2 Pioneer P1745HR 204.6 23.2


West Central OhioRegion 4 Performance Summary (continued)

BECK 6077HRTM* Comparisons BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons


14

24




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 44 BECK 5509A3 164.2 18.3 $0.90 2 58 Phoenix 5726A4** 170.2 18.9 $50.65BECK 5442VT3 164.5 18.7 BECK 5435HXR™* 160.6 18.2

1 25 BECK 5509A3 180.4 19.0 $115.18 2 94 Phoenix 5726A4** 174.7 19.2 -$2.49BECK 6733HXR™* 161.8 20.3 BECK 6077HR™* 173.8 18.1

1 12 BECK 5509A3 221.1 19.4 $26.67 1 16 Phoenix 5726A4** 199.1 20.2 -$7.29AgriGold A6533VT3 217.2 19.9 AgriGold A6573VT3P 200.1 20.0

1 14 BECK 5509A3 213.0 18.4 $38.60 1 10 Phoenix 5726A4** 201.6 19.9 $37.31Dekalb DKC62-54 207.6 19.3 Channel 210-57STX 193.7 18.9



1 18 BECK 5509A3 214.5 19.2 $111.16 1 11 Phoenix 5726A4** 190.9 20.1 $27.78Pioneer P1018AM1 194.7 18.9 Pioneer P1018AM1 183.7 18.3



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 12 BECK 6077AM™* 176.2 17.7 $67.68 1 14 BECK 6175AMX™* 125.3 18.4 $47.78BECK 5435AMX™* 165.2 18.3 Phoenix 5642A4** 117.5 19.0

1 11 BECK 6077AM™* 167.9 18.8 $74.21 1 31 BECK 6175AMX™* 173.0 19.8 $57.58BECK 6733HXR™* 157.4 21.0 BECK 6733HXR™* 163.6 20.4

1 8 BECK 6077AM™* 225.1 19.0 $64.28 1 24 BECK 6175AMX™* 200.5 20.4 $54.00AgriGold A6533VT3 215.1 19.8 AgriGold A6573VT3P 191.0 20.4

1 14 BECK 6077AM™* 206.5 18.4 $35.60 1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 187.8 19.8 $35.45AgriGold A6573VT3P 203.0 20.3 Pioneer P0916XR 180.2 18.7

1 14 BECK 6077AM™* 206.5 18.4 $69.51 1 20 BECK 6175AMX™* 186.4 19.9 -$3.60Channel 210-57STX 195.8 19.4 Pioneer P1018AM1 185.6 18.8

1 4 BECK 6077AM™* 226.1 18.9 $64.69 1 11 BECK 6175AMX™* 122.4 17.9 $32.50Dekalb DKC63-07 216.8 20.2 Pioneer P1184AM1 116.7 17.8

1 15 BECK 6077AM™* 196.0 18.2 -$0.83 1 2 BECK 6175AMX™* 105.5 17.7 $176.87Pioneer P1184XR 197.1 18.9 Pioneer P1319HR 75.8 19.3

1 8 BECK 6077AM™* 225.1 19.0 $168.79 1 3 BECK 6175AMX™* 152.7 17.1 $148.46Pioneer P1395AM1 197.9 20.6 Pioneer P1395HR 128.5 18.6


Southern Illinois and Southern IndianaRegion 5 Performance Summary


BECK 6077AM™* Comparisons BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons

14

25




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 90 BECK 6272HR™* 170.4 18.8 $35.66 2 20 Phoenix 6442A4** 147.4 19.3 $44.71Phoenix 5726A4** 165.0 19.5 Phoenix 5642A4** 139.4 19.1

2 44 BECK 6272HR™* 177.0 18.4 $2.36 2 72 Phoenix 6442A4** 180.6 19.8 $71.66Phoenix 6848A3** 177.7 19.3 BECK 6733HXR™* 168.4 20.1

1 10 BECK 6272HR™* 195.2 18.9 $42.83 1 14 Phoenix 6442A4** 206.2 21.0 $28.25Dekalb DKC59-64 188.4 19.4 AgriGold A6573VT3P 200.5 20.5


2 9 BECK 6272HR™* 176.5 19.1 $13.62 1 14 Phoenix 6442A4** 174.8 21.0 -$3.19Dekalb DKC64-69 172.8 18.0 Dekalb DKC62-97 174.5 20.3

1 19 BECK 6272HR™* 197.8 19.3 $44.12 2 11 Phoenix 6442A4** 163.0 17.9 $41.24Pioneer P1018AM1 189.7 19.0 Dekalb DKC63-87 154.8 16.9

1 22 BECK 6272HR™* 203.9 19.7 $19.26 2 32 Phoenix 6442A4** 184.1 19.7 $5.89Pioneer P1395AM1 201.8 20.6 Pioneer P1745HR 184.1 20.5



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

3 92 BECK 6626HXR™* 179.2 19.9 $3.34 1 21 Phoenix 6948A3** 140.6 21.1 $5.18BECK 6077HR™* 175.9 17.7 Phoenix 5726A4** 138.8 20.2

3 81 BECK 6626HXR™* 185.1 20.3 $17.06 1 27 Phoenix 6948A3** 176.0 21.4 $60.60BECK 6733HXR™* 182.1 20.3 BECK 6733HXR™* 164.1 20.4

1 8 BECK 6626HXR™* 225.2 22.1 $161.80 1 14 Phoenix 6948A3** 207.0 21.8 $26.16AgriGold A6573VT3P 195.0 21.1 AgriGold A6573VT3P 200.5 20.5

2 12 BECK 6626HXR™* 187.6 19.7 $39.40 1 4 Phoenix 6948A3** 216.7 22.2 $53.36Channel 216-96VT3P 178.7 18.1 Dekalb DKC62-54 205.0 20.7

2 15 BECK 6626HXR™* 196.8 21.8 -$2.82 1 4 Phoenix 6948A3** 216.7 22.2 $69.90Dekalb DKC62-97 194.4 19.7 Dekalb DKC63-42 201.8 20.5


1 8 BECK 6626HXR™* 225.2 22.1 $143.25 1 6 Phoenix 6948A3** 174.6 20.8 $14.20Pioneer P1395AM1 198.0 20.9 Pioneer P1184XR 169.7 18.8

2 33 BECK 6626HXR™* 181.3 20.8 $10.47 1 14 Phoenix 6948A3** 207.0 21.8 -$8.28Pioneer P1745HR 179.2 20.6 Pioneer P1395AM1 207.0 20.8


Southern Illinois and Southern IndianaRegion 5 Performance Summary (continued)



14

26




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 3 BECK 5509A3 197.3 16.6 $75.75 1 3 Phoenix 5726A4** 105.9 17.7 $7.21BECK 6077HRTM* 184.7 16.9 Phoenix 5642A4** 104.8 17.9

1 5 BECK 5509A3 141.8 15.5 $81.07 1 4 Phoenix 5726A4** 144.3 14.7 $77.29BECK 6733HXRTM* 129.6 17.3 BECK 6111HXRTM* 132.3 15.9

1 2 BECK 5509A3 174.8 15.3 $8.71 1 10 Phoenix 5726A4** 172.5 19.4 $24.85AgriGold A6458VT2 172.5 14.6 BECK 7988RR 169.7 20.7

1 2 BECK 5509A3 174.8 15.3 $1.18 1 5 Phoenix 5726A4** 194.3 18.9 $88.96AgriGold A6476VTP 174.6 15.3 BECK 8733HRTM* 180.7 20.4

1 2 BECK 5509A3 174.8 15.3 $20.65 1 4 Phoenix 5726A4** 144.3 14.7 $135.74AgriGold A6489VT3 172.7 16.5 AgriGold A6573VT3P 122.0 15.5

1 2 BECK 5509A3 169.8 17.3 $116.08 2 11 Phoenix 5726A4** 176.0 18.7 $8.26Dekalb DKC63-84 151.8 19.2 Pioneer P1184XR 174.2 18.4

1 4 BECK 5509A3 161.1 16.9 $3.10 2 4 Phoenix 5726A4** 146.9 15.4 $4.76Pioneer P1184AM1 160.9 17.2 Pioneer P1615HR 147.9 17.2



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

1 5 BECK 6175AMX™* 137.1 17.0 $22.65 2 14 BECK 6272HRTM* 154.3 16.8 $81.43Phoenix 5552A4** 133.3 17.1 BECK 5442VT3 141.2 17.7

1 6 BECK 6175AMX™* 136.9 16.6 $29.68 1 2 BECK 6272HRTM* 183.3 15.7 $22.12Phoenix 5642A4** 133.0 17.9 AgriGold A6533VT2 179.9 16.0

1 10 BECK 6175AMX™* 154.9 16.3 $48.55 2 6 BECK 6272HRTM* 161.8 15.7 $93.95BECK 6733HXRTM* 147.0 16.7 AgriGold A6573VT3P 146.0 15.9

1 3 BECK 6175AMX™* 138.6 16.4 $191.91 2 3 BECK 6272HRTM* 143.4 14.8 $148.17AgriGold A6533VT3P 104.9 15.2 Channel 216-96VT3P 118.4 14.9

1 5 BECK 6175AMX™* 156.7 17.1 $93.18 1 2 BECK 6272HRTM* 183.3 15.7 $60.29AgriGold A6573VT3P 140.1 16.5 Dekalb DKC63-87 174.1 16.6

2 3 BECK 6175AMX™* 198.0 18.5 $108.34 2 8 BECK 6272HRTM* 170.6 18.7 $24.25Dekalb DKC62-97 177.1 16.8 Pioneer P1184XR 166.5 18.8

1 4 BECK 6175AMX™* 136.7 16.1 $95.45 1 3 BECK 6272HRTM* 188.4 16.5 $31.43Dekalb DKC63-84 120.4 16.1 Pioneer P1412HR 183.9 17.2

1 5 BECK 6175AMX™* 163.1 16.7 $3.43 1 2 BECK 6272HRTM* 183.3 15.7 $5.46Pioneer P1184AM1 162.4 16.6 Pioneer P1690HR 184.0 17.0


KentuckyRegion 6 Performance Summary


BECK 6175AMX™* Comparisons BECK 6272HR™* Comparisons

14

27




% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 22 Phoenix 6442A4** 171.9 18.4 $61.24 2 5 BECK 6733HXRTM* 146.3 19.2 -$10.54BECK 6733HXRTM* 161.5 18.6 Pheonix 5552A4** 146.1 17.2

1 3 Phoenix 6442A4** 216.6 18.0 $77.22 3 15 BECK 6733HXRTM* 156.4 16.7 $3.64AgriGold A6517VTP 203.1 17.9 BECK 6179VT3 154.4 15.4

2 8 Phoenix 6442A4** 178.7 18.1 $89.09 3 15 BECK 6733HXRTM* 173.7 17.8 $7.35AgriGold A6533VT3 162.6 17.5 AgriGold A6533VT3 171.6 17.1

1 2 Phoenix 6442A4** 219.0 16.6 $48.83 3 27 BECK 6733HXRTM* 174.9 17.7 $12.13Dekalb DKC64-69 210.2 16.3 Dekalb DKC62-54 170.8 16.0

1 2 Phoenix 6442A4** 219.0 16.6 $185.43 3 9 BECK 6733HXRTM* 183.1 16.8 $15.00Dekalb DKC66-97 188.0 17.2 Dekalb DKC62-97 181.9 17.9

1 2 Phoenix 6442A4** 219.0 16.6 $161.66 3 14 BECK 6733HXRTM* 184.5 17.7 -$4.89Pioneer P1319HR 191.3 16.6 Dekalb DKC66-96 185.6 17.9

1 2 Phoenix 6442A4** 219.0 16.6 $54.53 2 19 BECK 6733HXRTM* 153.1 16.0 -$0.66Pioneer P1498HR 209.8 16.7 Pioneer P1395XR 152.9 15.7



% Moist.

$/Acre Adv.

2 20 BECK 6626HXR™* 184.9 19.7 $36.84 1 6 Phoenix 6948A3** 143.3 19.3 $45.85BECK 6733HXRTM* 178.2 19.5 Phoenix 5642A4** 133.8 17.7

2 5 BECK 6626HXR™* 177.0 20.6 $100.38 1 2 Phoenix 6948A3** 181.8 16.8 $5.32AgriGold A6533VT3 157.1 18.6 AgriGold A6533VT2P 179.9 16.0

2 2 BECK 6626HXR™* 229.1 21.6 $95.30 1 2 Phoenix 6948A3** 181.8 16.8 $12.21Dekalb DKC62-58 205.2 16.8 AgriGold A6553VT3 180.2 17.2

2 2 BECK 6626HXR™* 229.1 21.6 $83.51 1 2 Phoenix 6948A3** 181.8 16.8 $38.48Dekalb DKC62-97 208.8 17.9 AgriGold A6679VT2 175.8 17.3




2 2 BECK 6626HXR™* 200.7 20.8 $89.09 1 2 Phoenix 6948A3** 181.8 16.8 $64.30Dekalb DKC66-96 183.3 19.5 Pioneer P1412HR 170.3 16.4


KentuckyRegion 6 Performance Summary (continued)

Phoenix 6442A4**Comparisons BECK 6733HXR™* Comparisons


14

28


2012 Independent Test Results

F.I.R.S.T.CORN Brand Test/Location %Mois. Bu./A. Rank

Beck 5509A3 Bethany, IL -‐ Early 22.1 53.8 12th out of 63Beck 5509A3 Rossville, IL -‐ Early 24.2 230.7 12th out of 63Beck 5475AMX™* Tuscola, IL -‐ Early 17.2 100.2 9th out of 63Beck 4536A3 ILNO Ultra Early Summary 15.9 130.6 7th out of 48Beck 5114A4 ILNO Ultra Early Summary 16.8 128.2 10th out of 48Beck 5475AMX™* ILNO Early Summary 20.8 151.9 9th out of 60Phoenix 5385A3** Winnebago, IL -‐ Early 20.9 81.3 2nd out of 60Beck 5475AMX™* Delavan, IL -‐ Early 22.3 176.8 4th out of 63

Soy CapitalCORN Brand Test/Location %Mois. Bu./A. Rank

Beck 5475AMX™* Atlanta, IL -‐ Early 19.7 148.5 5th out of 40Beck 5114A4 Atlanta, IL -‐ Early 17.3 146.7 6th out of 40Phoenix 5385A3** Onarga, IL -‐ Early 15.8 94.9 7th out of 40Beck 5509A3 Geneseo, IL -‐ Late 19.7 255.7 5th out of 40Beck 6175AMX™* Onarga, IL -‐ Late 15.7 110.7 7th out of 40Beck 5509A3 Onarga, IL -‐ Late 17.1 119.0 4th out of 40Phoenix 5642A4** Adair, IL -‐ Early 18.7 197.4 9th out of 40Phoenix 5642A4** Champaign, IL -‐ Early 18.0 198.1 6th out of 40Phoenix 5552A4** Chrisman, IL -‐ Early 18.7 144.6 1st out of 40Beck 6272HR™* Chrisman, IL -‐ Late 18.4 160.6 6th out of 40Phoenix 5385A3** Bluffton, IN -‐ Early 22.6 224.8 1st out of 14Beck 5114A4 Arcanum, OH -‐ Early 18.3 151.0 3rd out of 14Phoenix 6442A4** Windfall, IN -‐ Late 23.2 229.4 2nd out of 14Beck 5114A4 Remington, IN -‐ Early 17.1 150.4 1st out of 14Beck 5475AMX™* Remington, IN -‐ Early 15.9 146.2 2nd out of 14Beck 5509A3 Remington, IN -‐ Late 17.4 154.8 1st out of 14Beck 5509A3 Williamsport, IN -‐ Late 16.4 176.0 1st out of 14

PurdueCORN Brand Test/Location %Mois. Bu./A. Rank

Beck 5509A3 Columbia City -‐ Mid 23.1 202.0 7th out of 46Phoenix 5552A4** Columbia City -‐ Mid 23.5 208.0 2nd out of 46Phoenix 6442A4** Evansville -‐ Late 17.9 127.0 5th out of 36Phoenix 5642A4** DeMotte -‐ Late 20.7 243.0 6th out of 27Phoenix 5552A4** Wanatah -‐ Mid 22.2 260.0 1st out of 46Phoenix 5552A4** Rushville -‐ Mid 20.5 193.0 5th out of 52Phoenix 5385A3** West Lafayette -‐ Early 23.6 171.0 9th out of 34Beck 6272HR™* Evansville -‐ Early 17.7 96.0 6th out of 44

Soy CapitalSOYBEANS Brand Test/Location %Mois. Bu./A. Rank

Beck 313NL Geneseo, IL -‐ LL 11.5 67.1 1st out of 14Beck 372NL Champaign, IL -‐ LL 12.0 65.1 2nd out of 11Beck 372NL Chrisman, IL -‐ LL 12.5 58.9 1st out of 11

29*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Yrs Plots Brand Bu./A. Difference

in Yield Yrs Plots Brand Bu./A. Difference

in Yield3 52 BECK 229NR™* 55.0 +0.1 3 84 BECK 241NR™* 59.6 +4.5

BECK 242NR™* 54.9 BECK 244NR™* 55.1

1 5 BECK 229NR™* 58.4 +6.4 2 29 BECK 241NR™* 56.4 +1.4Asgrow AG2632 52.0 Asgrow AG2631 55.0

1 10 BECK 229NR™* 53.9 +1.7 2 23 BECK 241NR™* 57.0 +0.9Croplan R2C2451 52.2 Asgrow AG2831 56.1

2 18 BECK 229NR™* 51.4 +0.7 2 6 BECK 241NR™* 61.6 +0.4Pioneer 92Y51 50.7 Asgrow AG3030 61.2

1 10 BECK 229NR™* 52.5 +0.2 2 21 BECK 241NR™* 56.6 +2.6Pioneer 92Y91 52.3 Pioneer 92Y30 54.0


2 15 BECK 229NR™* 52.4 +1.0 3 40 BECK 241NR™* 58.6 +0.9Stine 23RA22 51.4 Pioneer 92Y80 57.7

1 10 BECK 229NR™* 53.9 +2.8 2 15 BECK 229NR™* 54.8 +3.4Stine 2420-4 51.1 Stine 23RA22 51.4




BECK 244NR™* 55.4 BECK 322NR™* 51.9

2 29 BECK 263NR™* 56.4 +1.4 1 46 BECK 348NR™* 54.9 +1.8Asgrow AG2631 55.0 BECK 325NR™* 53.1



2 21 BECK 263NR™* 56.5 +3.1 1 25 BECK 348NR™* 58.1 -0.6Pioneer 92Y51 53.4 BECK 398NR 58.7




*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. *XL® is a trademark of Pioneer Hi-Bred.

BECK 263NR™* Comparisons BECK 348NR™* Comparisons (IL & W.IN)

SOYBEAN COMPARISONS SUMMARYMulti-Year Yield Comparisons of Various Products

BECK 229NR™* Comparisons BECK 241NR™* Comparisons

(Includes Farmer Plots, BECK'S Research, and University Data)

29





BECK 244NR™* 56.6 BECK 322NR™* 59.2

2 119 BECK 294NR™* 59.7 +1.6 2 173 BECK 335NR™* 60.1 +1.6BECK 289NR™* 58.1 BECK 325NR™* 58.5


3 282 BECK 294NR™* 60.4 -0.1 2 125 BECK 335NR™* 59.7 +0.5BECK 322NR™* 60.5 BECK 362NR™* 59.2






3 37 BECK 294NR™* 58.9 +0.9 1 8 BECK 335NR™* 61.2 +1.7NK S27-C4 58.0 Croplan R2C3461 59.5

2 15 BECK 294NR™* 57.8 +5.6 2 24 BECK 335NR™* 59.3 +1.1Pioneer 92M91 52.2 NK S35-T9 58.2






3 35 BECK 294NR™* 57.1 +1.5 1 8 BECK 335NR™* 61.2 +1.5Pioneer 93Y11 55.6 Stine 3522-4 59.7



SOYBEAN COMPARISONS (continued)

30





BECK 322NR™* 60.0 BECK 325NR™* 60.4



3 43 BECK 325NR™* 59.6 -0.2 2 42 BECK 368NR™* 60.8 +0.7Asgrow AG3030 59.8 BECK 400NR™* 60.1




2 9 BECK 325NR™* 67.9 +4.1 1 30 BECK 368NR™* 58.8 +0.9Channel 3801R2 63.8 Asgrow AG3932 57.9

3 13 BECK 325NR™* 62.0 +1.2 1 10 BECK 368NR™* 65.0 +3.1NK S31-L7 60.8 Asgrow AG4031 61.9

2 21 BECK 325NR™* 57.2 +1.0 1 20 BECK 368NR™* 57.9 +1.5NK S37-P5 56.2 Asgrow AG4130 56.4

4 40 BECK 325NR™* 58.7 +0.8 2 40 BECK 368NR™* 61.4 +1.5Pioneer 92Y80 57.9 NK S35-T9 59.9

4 137 BECK 325NR™* 61.9 +1.4 1 10 BECK 368NR™* 60.5 +0.4Pioneer 93M61 60.5 Pioneer 93Y60 60.1





3 77 BECK 325NR™* 57.2 +0.1 1 26 BECK 368NR™* 59.1 +1.3Pioneer 93Y91 57.1 Stine 3522-4 57.8




31




in Yield3 230 BECK 375NR™* 60.6 +1.9 3 253 BECK 398NR 60.2 +1.1

BECK 325NR™* 58.7 BECK 362NR™* 59.1

3 241 BECK 375NR™* 59.4 +1.2 3 188 BECK 398NR 59.3 +0.2BECK 362NR™* 58.2 BECK 375NR™* 59.1

2 64 BECK 375NR™* 62.0 +0.2 3 212 BECK 398NR 58.4 +1.9BECK 368NR™* 61.8 BECK 400NR™* 56.5

3 178 BECK 375NR™* 57.9 +1.3 2 35 BECK 398NR 60.1 +2.7BECK 400NR™* 56.6 Asgrow AG3430 57.4

3 23 BECK 375NR™* 61.2 +6.2 3 45 BECK 398NR 62.4 +2.4Asgrow AG3430 55.0 Asgrow AG3631 60.0





3 63 BECK 375NR™* 59.9 +1.9 1 12 BECK 398NR 64.5 +4.2NK S35-T9 58.0 Croplan R2C3461 60.3

2 21 BECK 375NR™* 61.2 +5.0 1 20 BECK 398NR 59.4 +0.4NK S37-P5 56.2 NK S38-K6 59.0

3 70 BECK 375NR™* 59.0 +0.2 3 68 BECK 398NR 60.9 +0.6NK S39-A3 58.8 Pioneer 93Y70 60.3

2 24 BECK 375NR™* 61.1 +4.6 3 20 BECK 398NR 70.8 +1.3Pioneer 93Y40 56.5 Pioneer 93Y82 69.5




3 93 BECK 375NR™* 58.4 +1.7 2 14 BECK 398NR 64.2 +3.9Pioneer 93Y91 56.7 Stine 3792-4 60.3



BECK 375NR™* Comparisons BECK 398NR Comparisons

32





BECK 375NR™* 58.2 Asgrow AG3932 57.0

1 79 BECK 418NR™* 60.8 +0.9 1 16 BECK 418NR™* 61.6 +1.0BECK 398NR 59.9 Asgrow AG4032 60.6

1 42 BECK 418NR™* 59.2 +4.6 1 46 BECK 418NR™* 61.0 +2.6BECK 400NR™* 54.6 Asgrow AG4130 58.4

1 56 BECK 418NR™* 59.8 +2.0 1 22 BECK 418NR™* 60.5 +1.3BECK 432NR™* 57.8 Asgrow AG4232 59.2

1 54 BECK 418NR™* 59.9 +1.3 1 20 BECK 418NR™* 60.1 +1.1BECK 444NR™* 58.6 NK S38-K6 59.0

1 20 BECK 418NR™* 60.1 +3.3 1 36 BECK 418NR™* 60.8 +5.0Asgrow AG3631 56.8 Pioneer 93Y91 55.8

1 20 BECK 418NR™* 60.1 +1.1 1 20 BECK 418NR™* 60.1 +3.8Asgrow AG3632 59.0 Pioneer 93Y92 56.3

1 37 BECK 418NR™* 60.0 +0.3 1 36 BECK 418NR™* 60.8 +1.0Asgrow AG3931 59.7 Stine 4032-4 59.8




BECK 400NR™* 54.0 BECK 432NR™* 57.8

3 131 BECK 432NR™* 56.1 +1.8 2 41 BECK 444NR™* 59.7 +2.6BECK 451NR 54.3 BECK 451NR 57.1





3 21 BECK 432NR™* 54.2 +3.5 1 4 BECK 444NR™* 59.2 +3.4Pioneer 94Y21 50.7 Croplan RC4417 55.8





BECK 418NR™* Comparisons

33




in Yield2 33 BECK 477NR™* 59.6 +0.7 3 23 BECK 331N 60.0 +5.8

BECK 451NR 58.9 BECK 294NR™* 54.2

2 61 BECK 477NR™* 56.2 -0.3 3 51 BECK 331N 57.0 +0.6BECK 495NR™* 56.5 BECK 319N 56.4

2 18 BECK 477NR™* 60.8 +6.0 4 43 BECK 331N 60.0 +1.6Asgrow AG4730 54.8 BECK 322NR™* 58.4

1 10 BECK 477NR™* 57.2 +2.1 4 64 BECK 331N 57.3 +1.3Pioneer 94Y20 55.1 BECK 325NR™* 56.0

2 24 BECK 477NR™* 57.0 +3.0 2 20 BECK 331N 60.3 -0.7Pioneer 94Y60 54.0 BECK 335NR™* 61.0

2 10 BECK 477NR™* 63.1 +0.1 3 28 BECK 331N 54.9 +2.1Pioneer 94Y80 63.0 BECK 362NR™* 52.8

2 13 BECK 477NR™* 58.9 +0.7 2 7 BECK 331N 69.9 -1.0Stine 4392-4 58.2 BECK 375NR™* 70.9

2 18 BECK 477NR™* 60.2 +3.9 3 13 BECK 331N 58.6 +5.1Stine 4782-4 56.3 Pioneer 93B82 53.5



in Yield3 11 BECK 389N 55.0 +4.3 4 59 BECK 414N 60.0 +3.2

BECK 322NR™* 50.7 BECK 362NR™* 56.8

3 27 BECK 389N 59.6 +2.9 4 38 BECK 414N 60.7 +0.8BECK 325NR™* 56.7 BECK 372NL 59.9

3 25 BECK 389N 57.8 +1.3 3 40 BECK 414N 57.9 +0.7BECK 362NR™* 56.5 BECK 432NR™* 57.2

3 30 BECK 389N 58.8 +0.0 2 12 BECK 414N 63.1 +3.5BECK 372NL 58.8 Asgrow AG4130 59.6

3 25 BECK 389N 57.8 +1.8 4 57 BECK 414N 61.2 +6.2BECK 387N 56.0 Pioneer 93B82 55.0

2 20 BECK 389N 61.7 +1.0 1 12 BECK 414N 60.7 +3.0BECK 375NR™* 60.7 Pioneer 93Y91 57.7

1 12 BECK 389N 59.6 +1.1 2 20 BECK 414N 66.1 +4.6Asgrow AG3932 58.5 Pioneer 94Y01 61.5

1 10 BECK 389N 66.1 +6.0 1 10 BECK 414N 65.2 +2.8Asgrow AG4130 60.1 Pioneer 94Y22 62.4


BECK 477NR™* Comparisons BECK 331N Comparisons

BECK 389N Comparisons BECK 414N Comparisons


34




in Yield1 17 BECK 297NL 63.3 +2.1 1 24 BECK 313NL 63.9 +3.0

BECK 263NR™* 61.2 BECK 294NR™* 60.9

1 24 BECK 297NL 63.1 +1.7 1 42 BECK 313NL 61.4 +1.0BECK 294NR™* 61.4 BECK 297NL 60.4

1 40 BECK 297NL 60.8 +2.3 1 17 BECK 313NL 58.3 +0.9BECK 306NL 58.5 BECK 322NR™* 57.4

1 15 BECK 297NL 58.3 +0.0 1 28 BECK 313NL 62.3 +3.1BECK 322NR™* 58.3 BECK 325NR™* 59.2



1 4 BECK 297NL 64.0 +2.6 1 20 BECK 313NL 63.3 +0.8Asgrow AG2532 61.4 BECK 372NL 62.5

1 4 BECK 297NL 64.0 +10.2 1 13 BECK 313NL 65.8 +1.3Asgrow AG2631 53.8 BECK 375NR™* 64.5

1 4 BECK 297NL 64.0 +0.4 1 5 BECK 313NL 73.8 +6.7Asgrow AG2831 63.6 BECK 398NR 67.1

1 8 BECK 297NL 58.8 +3.5 1 4 BECK 313NL 61.5 +7.7Asgrow AG3131 55.3 Asgrow AG2631 53.8



1 10 BECK 297NL 61.3 +0.2 1 4 BECK 313NL 61.5 +3.3Asgrow AG3431 61.1 NK S27-C4 58.2

1 4 BECK 297NL 64.0 +5.9 1 4 BECK 313NL 61.5 +2.9Pioneer 92Y91 58.1 Pioneer 92Y80 58.6



1 12 BECK 297NL 60.6 +1.3 1 8 BECK 313NL 57.0 +3.4Stine 29LC28 59.3 Pioneer 93Y11 53.6



BECK 297NL Comparisons BECK 313NL Comparisons

35





BECK 362NR™* 57.2 BECK 325NR™* 64.6

2 43 BECK 372NL 60.9 -0.2 1 4 BECK 423NL 62.6 +1.8BECK 375NR™* 61.1 BECK 362NR™* 60.8

4 56 BECK 372NL 57.8 +1.0 1 17 BECK 423NL 61.7 +2.3BECK 392NL 56.8 BECK 372NL 59.4

2 34 BECK 372NL 62.6 -0.5 1 9 BECK 423NL 64.1 -0.3BECK 398NR 63.1 BECK 375NR™* 64.4

4 31 BECK 372NL 57.6 +0.0 1 15 BECK 423NL 62.7 +0.2BECK 400NR™* 57.6 BECK 392NL 62.5






1 12 BECK 372NL 63.5 +1.7 1 10 BECK 423NL 63.7 +3.6Pioneer 93L71 61.8 Asgrow AG4130 60.1

1 12 BECK 372NL 63.5 +1.6 1 10 BECK 423NL 63.7 +7.1Pioneer 93Y41 61.9 Pioneer 94L31 56.6




2 15 BECK 372NL 61.0 +2.1 1 10 BECK 423NL 63.7 +4.1Stine 37LA02 58.9 Stine 39LC08 59.6

1 12 BECK 372NL 63.5 +3.5 1 10 BECK 423NL 63.7 +5.0Stine 39LC08 60.0 Stine 44LC28 58.7




36




in Yield3 54 BECK 306NL 58.9 -0.5 3 97 BECK 356NL 55.7 -1.1

BECK 294NR™* 59.4 BECK 325NR™* 56.8

3 36 BECK 306NL 59.0 -1.5 3 50 BECK 356NL 55.1 +0.7BECK 322NR™* 60.5 BECK 357NR™* 54.4

3 25 BECK 306NL 56.6 +1.3 3 67 BECK 356NL 55.5 -1.2BECK 357NR™* 55.3 BECK 362NR™* 56.7


1 8 BECK 306NL 56.0 +1.8 2 10 BECK 356NL 49.3 -0.8Asgrow AG3132 54.2 Asgrow AG3439 50.1

1 4 BECK 306NL 61.0 +2.4 2 29 BECK 356NL 52.5 -0.3Pioneer 92Y80 58.6 Asgrow AG3555 52.8






BECK 368NR™* 61.0 BECK 400NR™* 52.6

2 33 BECK 386NL 58.9 -1.7 3 40 BECK 456NL 56.2 -0.6BECK 375NR™* 60.6 BECK 432NR™* 56.8

1 12 BECK 386NL 60.0 -0.9 3 16 BECK 456NL 55.1 +2.6Asgrow AG3632 60.9 BECK 451NR 52.5




1 10 BECK 386NL 59.8 +3.2 2 18 BECK 456NL 55.7 +1.9Pioneer 94L31 56.6 Pioneer 94Y21 53.8

1 10 BECK 386NL 59.8 +1.0 1 10 BECK 456NL 62.0 +3.3Pioneer 94Y21 58.8 Stine 44LC28 58.7





37

38

RAINFALLApril 2.83 in.May 2.00 in.June 1.47 in.July 2.70 in. August 4.49 in.

Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Show Plot - Office - 2012Location: N1 plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 19, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 24, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 30,136 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Three 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

YieldRank Brand

HarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 Phoenix 6442A4** 26,500 55.7 3.8 23.6 232.62 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 27,000 59.4 0.0 21.8 231.83 BECK 6626AMX™* 28,000 58.8 0.0 23.1 226.04 Phoenix 5642A4** 29,500 57.4 0.0 22.6 225.45 Phoenix 6948A3** 29,500 58.2 0.0 23.3 222.36 BECK 6733HXR™* 29,000 58.9 0.0 22.3 222.17 BECK 5442VT3 27,500 56.7 1.8 21.4 216.48 BECK 5269HXR™* 28,000 58.2 0.0 20.1 205.29 Phoenix 5832A3** 27,500 58.3 0.0 21.9 200.5

10 BECK 5509A3 27,500 58.4 0.0 19.9 195.111 Phoenix 5385A3** 29,000 57.8 0.0 20.9 194.712 BECK 5246HR™* 25,500 58.3 0.0 19.2 192.513 BECK 5475AMX™* 25,000 59.0 0.0 20.3 185.714 BECK 5140HR™* 25,500 57.6 0.0 17.9 184.715 BECK 6077AM™* 30,000 57.3 0.0 21.3 183.316 BECK 6175AMX™* 27,000 58.8 0.0 21.8 182.217 Phoenix 5552E** 27,500 57.5 0.0 22.3 181.018 BECK EX 8202 (6245Hx1 Genetics) 30,000 55.7 0.0 22.5 180.519 BECK 6272HR™* 29,500 58.6 0.0 22.7 180.120 BECK 5435wx 26,000 57.3 0.0 21.1 179.621 Phoenix 5726A4** 26,500 55.5 0.0 24.3 178.3

AVERAGE 27,690 57.8 0.3 21.6 200.0†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

39

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Corn Show Plot - Arcadia - 2012Location: 1/2 Mile West of Arcadia Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine Harvested: October 16, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybridsReplications: Two (averaged)

YieldRank Brand

HarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK EX 0222™* 34,042 57.7 0.0 22.3 233.92 Phoenix 6948A3** 35,500 57.8 0.0 22.6 228.93 Phoenix 5642A4** 32,958 57.2 0.0 20.3 226.34 BECK 6733HXR™* 32,917 60.3 0.0 22.1 221.75 BECK 5509A3 33,125 59.0 0.8 19.5 221.36 BECK 5442VT3 30,250 58.5 0.0 19.0 220.07 BECK 6272HR™* 30,167 60.4 0.0 19.6 219.58 BECK 5140HR™* 35,958 56.9 0.0 18.1 216.39 Phoenix 5385A3** 35,250 58.0 0.0 19.3 214.310 Phoenix 5552E** 35,083 57.3 0.0 19.8 210.411 BECK EX 0220™* 34,750 60.7 0.0 20.0 209.712 BECK 6626AMX™* 34,583 61.0 0.0 22.4 208.913 BECK 6175AMX™* 31,958 60.5 0.0 19.7 208.114 BECK 5246HR™* 32,500 58.1 0.8 18.6 207.315 BECK 5475AMX™* 33,500 60.9 0.0 18.8 206.916 BECK 6077AM™* 32,167 58.5 1.5 19.4 202.017 Phoenix 6442A4** 35,167 55.2 0.7 22.2 201.118 BECK EX 0209™* 32,125 56.9 0.0 18.0 198.619 Phoenix 5832A3** 33,042 58.5 3.0 20.4 194.720 BECK EX 0218™* 27,167 59.1 0.0 20.3 190.821 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 35,417 58.9 0.0 20.4 189.322 BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 33,750 56.8 0.0 17.7 185.2

AVERAGE 33,244 58.6 0.3 20.0 209.8†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

40


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

Jason Gahimer, Central Indiana PFR Assistant

YieldRank Brand

HarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 Phoenix 6948A3** 33,000 57.7 0.0 23.5 209.62 Phoenix 5385A3** 32,000 57.1 0.0 18.8 196.53 BECK 6626AMX™* 31,500 59.4 0.0 22.1 196.34 BECK EX 0222™* 27,000 59.5 0.0 23.6 195.25 BECK 5442VT3 31,000 60.5 0.0 19.1 190.66 Phoenix 6442A4** 33,500 56.9 0.0 20.0 190.47 Phoenix 5642A4** 29,500 58.8 0.0 20.4 190.38 BECK 5509A3 32,000 59.9 0.0 18.9 189.09 BECK 6272HR™* 33,000 61.0 0.0 20.1 188.6

10 BECK EX 0220™* 32,000 62.5 0.0 20.1 184.611 BECK 6733HXR™* 27,500 58.8 0.0 22.1 183.912 BECK 5246HR™* 29,500 59.6 0.0 18.3 180.613 BECK 6175AMX™* 27,500 61.2 0.0 20.6 178.714 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 32,000 61.1 0.0 20.4 178.415 BECK 6077AM™* 31,500 60.4 2.9 19.7 178.316 Phoenix 5832A3** 28,000 58.8 0.0 21.6 177.217 BECK 5140HR™* 27,500 58.8 1.7 18.2 176.718 BECK 5475AMX™* 30,500 60.8 0.0 18.3 172.419 Phoenix 5726A4** 29,500 56.9 0.0 22.9 170.420 Phoenix 5552E** 31,500 59.0 0.0 18.9 168.721 BECK EX 0209™* 31,000 57.1 1.5 18.0 164.822 BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 29,500 57.2 0.0 18.6 133.5

AVERAGE 30,455 59.2 0.3 20.2 181.6

BECK’S Corn Show Plot - Atlanta - 2012

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

Location: SR 19 West of Atlanta Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 20, 2012 Tillage: Disc / V-Rip / S-Tine Harvested: September 20, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep, 1 qt. Princep,Population: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

41

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Genetic Supplier Study - 2012Location: Field C plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 28, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicept & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

YieldRank Brand

Test†

WeightPercent

Broken StalksPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 Phoenix 6948A3** 56.0 0.0 18.6 223.52 BECK EX 0257 57.4 0.0 21.2 219.13 Phoenix 6442A4** 56.7 1.5 19.6 218.54 Phoenix 6848A3** 57.2 3.2 18.7 217.25 BECK EX 0145 57.6 0.0 20.2 216.56 Phoenix 5642A4** 57.7 0.0 18.4 213.97 Phoenix 5832A3** 61.8 0.0 18.3 213.58 BECK 6272HR™* 59.3 0.0 17.6 213.49 Phoenix 5385A3** 59.1 0.0 17.6 213.4

10 BECK 5509A3 59.5 3.0 17.3 210.311 BECK EX 0237 57.4 0.0 21.1 209.512 BECK EX 0157™* 58.8 0.0 18.7 209.313 BECK EX 0220™* 61.3 0.0 17.1 208.214 BECK 6179VT3 58.6 0.0 17.8 207.715 BECK 5354HXR™* 59.2 0.0 18.5 207.316 BECK 6626AMX™* 60.8 0.0 19.5 205.017 BECK 5475AM™* 60.6 0.0 16.6 202.518 BECK 5475AMX™* 60.2 1.7 16.8 201.719 Phoenix 5552E** 58.0 0.0 18.1 201.220 BECK 6733HXR™* 59.9 0.0 19.5 200.921 BECK EX 0218™* 60.3 0.0 17.9 200.822 BECK 5442VT3 59.3 1.5 17.0 196.823 BECK EX 0222™* 60.6 0.0 19.2 195.124 BECK 6077HR™* 60.8 0.0 18.5 191.425 BECK 6175AMX™* 59.5 0.0 18.0 191.026 BECK 5435HXR™* 62.4 0.0 17.7 189.127 BECK 5435AMX™* 62.4 0.0 17.9 189.128 BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 57.5 1.7 17.1 187.929 BECK EX 0209™* 59.1 0.0 16.8 187.730 BECK 5140HR™* 59.5 0.0 17.6 186.831 Phoenix 5726A4** 58.9 1.5 19.8 185.532 BECK 5246HR™* 60.3 0.0 17.3 184.233 BECK EX 0243 60.8 0.0 19.3 182.334 BECK 5269HXR™* 59.1 1.6 17.9 179.335 BECK 4536A3 56.5 0.0 16.9 179.036 BECK 6077AM™* 59.4 1.5 17.5 175.437 BECK EX 0107 57.9 0.0 16.4 172.438 BECK EX 0139 58.9 0.0 17.5 170.639 BECK 6111HXR™* 62.0 0.0 18.0 168.340 BECK EX 0207™* 57.6 1.5 15.9 162.741 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 59.9 3.2 17.6 157.9

AVERAGE 59.3 0.5 18.1 196.2†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Viptera is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Herculex is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC. Roundup Ready and YieldGard

VT Triple are registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC. Artesian is a trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Optimum, AcreMax, AQUAmax are trademarks of Dupont Pioneer.

Purpose: This study is designed to showcase the variety of genetics that Beck’s offers. This plot showcases some of our leading genetics with traits like Agrisure Viptera®, Herculex® XTRA with Roundup Ready®, YieldGard VT Triple®, Optimum®AcreMax® Xtra, Optimum® AQUAMax™, and our latest addition Agrisure Artesian™. We also evaluated some of our leading experimental hybrids.

42


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BrandSoil Type

HarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

2012Bushels†

Per Acre

2012AverageBu./A.†

Bu./A.†

AdvantageIn HP Soil

Phoenix 5642A4** HP 32,000 56.1 0.0 21.8 307.0 267.2 +79.7Phoenix 5642A4** MP 31,000 58.7 0.9 24.5 227.3

BECK 5442VT3 HP 33,500 57.2 0.0 20.2 292.0 260.8 +62.4BECK 5442VT3 MP 31,750 60.7 0.0 24.2 229.6

BECK 6175AMX™* HP 31,500 58.8 0.0 21.7 279.6 241.7 +75.8BECK 6175AMX™* MP 31,750 60.4 0.0 24.9 203.8

BECK 6733HXR™* HP 31,500 58.1 0.0 23.9 276.0 253.2 +45.7BECK 6733HXR™* MP 31,250 59.2 0.0 25.5 230.3


BECK 6077AM™* HP 33,000 57.4 0.0 20.9 264.7 232.0 +65.5BECK 6077AM™* MP 33,750 59.3 0.0 24.4 199.2

BECK 6272HR™* HP 33,500 58.3 0.0 21.7 263.6 235.8 +55.6BECK 6272HR™* MP 31,000 58.9 0.0 25.2 208.0


BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* HP 34,500 59.4 0.0 22.0 261.6 229.7 +63.8BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* MP 32,250 60.1 0.0 25.8 197.8


BECK 5509A3 HP 34,000 56.9 0.0 21.0 260.5 246.8 +27.5BECK 5509A3 MP 32,250 60.9 0.0 24.3 233.0

BECK EX 0220™* HP 32,000 59.3 0.0 20.8 260.4 240.4 +40.0BECK EX 0220™* MP 32,750 61.2 0.0 24.8 220.4





BECK’S Advanced Hybrid Corn Plot in HP & MP Soils - 2012

Location: 300-1, 2 N & H3 plots Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: HP: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 8, 2012 MP: No-TillPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Rows: Two 30” rows 8 oz. 2,4-D (Only on MP soils)

Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPost: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

Purpose: This study shows how our most popular hybrids as well as some leading experimental hybrids perform in HP (Highly Productive) and MP (Medium Productive) soil types.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC.

43

Central Indiana PFR


BECK’S Advanced Hybrid Corn Plot in HP & MP Soils - Continued

Summary: Since 1999, when we began this study, yield differences between HP and MP soils have been a direct reflection of available moisture. This year with a later planting date, we actually achieved the highest yield on the farm in HP soils with Phoenix 5642A4** at 307 Bu./A. By pollinating later, both of these plots missed the majority of this season's heat stress. Both the HP and MP fields averaged very well with minimal amounts of rain. However, we still see a correlation to yield and soil type as the HP soils averaged 45.6 Bu./A. better than the MP soil.

BrandSoil Type

HarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

2012Bushels†

Per Acre

2012AverageBu./A.†

Bu./A.†

AdvantageIn HP Soil


BECK 6179VT3 HP 32,000 57.6 0.0 21.6 250.1 231.8 +36.7BECK 6179VT3 MP 31,750 59.6 0.0 24.2 213.4


BECK EX 0282 HP 34,500 58.6 0.0 22.0 245.8 218.0 +55.6BECK EX 0282 MP 34,000 60.5 0.8 24.8 190.2



Phoenix 5552E** HP 33,500 57.4 0.0 20.9 237.0 219.2 +35.6Phoenix 5552E** MP 31,500 59.1 0.0 23.1 201.4


BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) HP 30,000 55.7 0.0 19.1 229.2 213.6 +31.2BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) MP 30,750 58.1 0.0 23.1 198.0


HP Soil Average 32,231 57.8 0.2 21.5 257.1 +45.6 Bu./A. DifferenceMP Soil Average 31,587 59.8 0.1 24.5 211.5

Beck's custom built 20" row sidedress applicator. Beck's CASE IH 30" row sidedress applicator.

44


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 300 Bushel Attempt - 2012Location: 300-1 & 3 (S) plots Previous Crop: 20”: CornPlanted: April 13, 2012 30”: SoybeansHarvested: September 12, 2012 Tillage: CAB: V-Rip / S-TinePopulation: 20”: 41,600 seeds/A. CAC: Moldboard / S-Tine

30”: 37,636 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: 20”: Six 20” rows Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

30”: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

BrandHarvestedPopulation

Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentRoot

LodgingPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreCORN AFTER SOYBEANS - 30” ROWS (10 Oz. HEADLINE AMP®, 32 Oz. SEvIN® & 1 GAL. NITAMIN®)BECK 6175AMX™* 38,500 58.4 0.0 0.0 25.0 235.8Phoenix 5552A4** 37,500 57.2 0.0 0.0 26.0 222.5BECK 6077AM™* 37,500 55.9 0.0 0.0 24.2 219.9Phoenix 5642A4** 37,500 57.3 0.0 0.0 26.8 218.5BECK 5509A3 39,000 58.2 0.0 0.0 23.0 213.4BECK 6733HXR™* 33,500 57.5 0.0 0.0 26.7 211.5BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 37,500 57.8 0.0 0.0 25.1 209.3BECK 5475AMX™* 33,000 58.6 0.0 1.5 22.4 203.3

AVERAGE 36,750 57.6 0.0 0.2 24.9 216.8

CORN AFTER CORN (2nd YEAR) - 20” ROWS (10 Oz. HEADLINE AMP®, 32 Oz. SEvIN® & 1 GAL. NITAMIN®)BECK 6175AMX™* 42,800 59.8 1.8 0.0 26.0 232.0BECK 6733HXR™* 40,548 60.6 0.0 0.0 27.5 214.4BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 43,551 59.1 1.7 0.0 24.8 211.1BECK 6077AM™* 39,046 57.7 0.0 0.0 24.5 202.5BECK 5509A3 42,800 59.3 0.0 0.0 22.8 172.1BECK 5475AMX™* 36,793 59.5 0.0 0.0 22.9 168.7Phoenix 5642A4** 42,050 57.6 0.0 0.0 26.5 162.8Phoenix 5552A4** 37,544 55.8 0.0 0.0 25.9 149.9

AVERAGE 40,642 58.7 0.4 0.0 25.1 189.2

Purpose: In our attempt to reach 300 bushels per acre, we have tried several different approaches in the past 32 years. In earlier years, we increased our populations and applied extremely high rates of fertilizer as well as some micronutrients. In the mid to late 80s, we tried using different tillage methods like v-rip, chisel and moldboard plow. From 1991 to 2002, we tested zone-till vs. conv.-till.In 2003, we tested ultra-high populations and twin rows using conv.-till practices. Since 2004, we have compared the following crop rotations: continuous corn, two-year corn/one-year soybean, and corn/soybean rotations. In 2012, we planted 20" rows in the second year corn rotation, 30" rows were planted in the 12 year continuous corn and first year corn following soybean rotation.

45

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S 300 Bushel Attempt - ContinuedLocation: 300-4 S plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 13, 2012 Tillage: Moldboard / S-TineHarvested: September 12, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 37,636 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids


Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentRoot

LodgingPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreCONTINUOUS CORN, 12th YEAR (10 Oz. HEADLINE AMP®, 32 Oz. SEvIN® & 1 GAL. NITAMIN®)BECK 6175AMX™* 37,000 58.2 0.0 0.0 23.6 180.3BECK 5475AMX™* 33,500 57.2 1.5 0.0 21.8 173.5BECK 5509A3 37,500 57.2 1.3 0.0 22.0 170.9Phoenix 5642A4** 34,000 57.3 0.0 0.0 25.1 162.0Phoenix 5552A4** 36,000 57.2 0.0 0.0 24.9 161.3BECK 6077AM™* 36,000 57.8 2.8 0.0 24.0 160.6BECK 6733HXR™* 39,000 59.5 0.0 0.0 26.2 140.8BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 36,500 58.3 0.0 0.0 25.6 139.2

AVERAGE 36,188 57.8 0.7 0.0 24.2 161.1†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Sevin is a registered trademark of Bayer. Headline AMP is a registered trademark of BASF. Nitamin is a registered trademark of Georgia-Pacific.

The rumor is true, we raised 307.0 Bu./A. corn this year with Phoenix 5642A4** in the conventional-till portion of the Advanced Hybrid Study. This plot is right across the grass lane from the 300 Bu./A. attempt plot. The key is that the 307.0 Bu./A. was planted on May 10th approximately one month later than the 300 Bu. Attempt Plot. This later planting date allowed it to pollinate in cooler weather and take advantage of the late rains we experienced.

Wow! 307.0 Bu./A.

Summary: This year with the adverse weather conditions we were able to see differences in population and crop rotation. The first year corn visually handled the stress of dry weather better throughout the entire growing season. Toward the end of the growing season, the CAB stayed healthier and held up better to some late season storms. Although there were many differences across the plots BECK 6175AMX™* had the highest yield in all three sections. We saw the highest individual yield and section average in the first year CAB 30" row section. One of the biggest yield differences we saw was between the 12 year CAC section and the CAB section. The CAB showed an advantage of 55.7 Bu./A. over the 12 year CAC.

46


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

YieldRank Brand

Test†

Weight

PercentBroken Stalks

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK 6733HXR™* 57.6 0.0 21.8 209.92 BECK EX 0222™* 56.0 0.0 21.3 206.83 BECK 6272HR™* 58.9 0.0 19.6 197.54 BECK 6179VT3 57.1 0.0 20.6 196.95 BECK 6111HXR™* 60.2 0.0 20.3 196.86 BECK EX 0220™* 58.4 0.0 20.0 194.37 BECK 6077AM™* 56.8 0.0 20.7 194.08 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 59.1 0.0 22.0 194.09 Phoenix 5642A4** 55.2 0.0 21.1 193.7

10 BECK 6175AMX™* 59.1 0.0 21.0 193.011 BECK 5509A3 56.8 0.0 20.7 192.712 Phoenix 6442A4** 55.9 1.6 22.3 192.413 Phoenix 6948A3** 56.2 0.0 21.5 191.614 BECK 6626AMX™* 58.8 0.0 21.9 190.415 Phoenix 5385A3** 58.4 0.0 19.9 189.416 BECK 5269HXR™* 59.6 0.0 20.1 189.317 BECK 5444VT3 57.5 0.0 19.9 188.418 BECK 4536A3 55.3 0.0 18.9 187.419 BECK 5475AMX™* 60.4 0.0 19.3 186.820 BECK 5140HR™* 58.5 0.0 19.7 186.721 BECK 5354HXR™* 57.6 0.0 20.6 186.522 BECK 5244VT3 58.7 0.0 20.0 185.923 BECK 5442VT3 57.2 3.2 19.7 185.324 Phoenix 5832A3** 56.1 0.0 20.8 185.225 BECK 5246HR™* 59.8 0.0 20.2 184.226 BECK EX 0218™* 58.2 0.0 21.1 183.227 BECK EX 0209™* 57.1 0.0 19.0 182.128 Phoenix 5552E** 55.9 0.0 20.7 180.829 Phoenix 5726A4** 55.0 0.0 21.6 170.130 BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 56.5 0.0 19.4 164.4

AVERAGE 57.6 0.2 20.5 189.3

BECK’S High School Educational Plot - 2012

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Location: SR 19 across from Previous Crop: SoybeansHamilton Heights High School Tillage: No-Till

Planted: May 15, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Harvested: October 25, 2012 & 8 oz. 2,4-DPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: Four 30" rows Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar,Replications: Two (averaged) 1 qt. Class Act &

32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX,1 qt. Class Act

Purpose: This plot is located across from our local high school. We invite students in agriculture classes to the plot site during planting and harvest to explain the technology that we use to produce a crop. These technologies include seed treatments, biotech traits, auto-guidance and other general equipment used to plant, harvest, and gather data.

47

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Fungicide Timing Study - 2012Location: High School SW plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 19, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. Princep,Population: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rowsReplications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate hybrid specific responses to various fungicide application timings. Treatments consist of 3 oz. Headline® at the V5 growth stage, 10 oz. Headline AMP® at full tassel (VT), and a combination of the two timings. A full tassel (VT) application is most common among our marketing area, but if disease pressure is high it may be necessary to apply an early preventative treatment.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Headline and Headline AMP are registered trademarks of BASF.Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. ^Net return is gross return minus cost of fungicide, application and drying cost. Headline $415.00/gal., Headline AMP $282.00/gal., $6.00/A. application cost and $0.04/point drying cost. ^^Return on investment is the difference in net return of the treatment entry compared to the control.

Summary: This year we saw our best yield results from the combination V5/VT application, giving us an average 9.6 Bu./A. increase over the control. However, the V5 application of Headline was our best return on investment coming in at $37.41/A. In terms of individual hybrids we saw our best response to the different fungicide applications with BECK 6179VT3. As we evaluate the need for fungicide applications it is important to not only consider weather conditions and leaf disease pressure, but to also consider the hybrid response as well. As we continue to test multiple hybrids, as well as the different timings, we will gain more knowledge on how and when it is economically beneficial to apply fungicides.

BrandPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^

ReturnReturn on^^ Investment

BECK 6175AMX™*

Control 23.5 83.0 ---- $0.00 $461.48 ----3 oz. Headline® @ V5 24.0 88.2 +5.2 $9.73 $472.90 +$17.423 oz. Headline @ V5 + 10 oz. Headline AMP® @ VT 24.3 90.3 +7.3 $37.76 $461.42 -$0.0610 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 24.7 90.9 +7.9 $28.03 $473.19 +$11.71

AVERAGE 24.1 88.1 +6.8

BECK 6179vT3Control 21.9 103.6 ---- $0.00 $582.85 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 20.7 122.5 +18.9 $9.73 $679.34 +$102.483 oz. Headline @ V5 + 10 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 20.3 132.2 +28.6 $37.76 $714.19 +$131.3410 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 20.9 129.8 +26.2 $28.03 $707.42 +$124.56

AVERAGE 20.9 122.0 +24.6BECK 6626AMX™*

Control 24.4 103.1 ---- $0.00 $569.52 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 24.1 103.9 +0.8 $9.73 $559.67 -$3.863 oz. Headline @ V5 + 10 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 25.1 96.0 -7.1 $37.76 $490.05 -$79.4810 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 24.9 90.3 -12.8 $28.03 $469.16 -$100.36

AVERAGE 24.6 98.3 -6.4

TREATMENT SUMMARYControl 23.3 96.6 ---- $0.00 $538.06 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 22.9 104.8 +8.2 $9.73 $569.47 +$37.413 oz. Headline @ V5 + 10 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 23.2 106.2 +9.6 $37.76 $553.92 +$15.8510 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 23.5 103.7 +7.1 $28.03 $548.75 +$10.69

AVERAGE 23.2 102.8 +8.3

48


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Replant Study - 2012Location: T1 & T2 plots Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: Various Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: Various Herbicide: Pre: 1.67 qts. Bicep, 1 qt. Princep,Population: Various Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar, 1 qt. Class Act &Rows: Four 30” rows 32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Planting DatePlanting

PopulationPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreReplant†

AdvantageNet^

ReturnAdditional

$/A.BECK 5246HR™*

March 15 (Normal 1st Planting) 35,077 17.1 74.9 $435.62March 15 21,046 17.2 52.0 $302.22March 29 (Replanted) 35,077 19.3 119.3 +67.3 $658.35 +$356.13

March 29 21,046 19.4 127.1 $727.52April 12 (Replanted) 35,077 19.7 143.3 +16.2 $793.53 +$66.01

April 12 21,046 19.3 134.1 $768.12April 25 (Replanted) 35,077 19.6 140.4 +6.3 $777.53 +$9.40

April 25 21,046 19.6 136.7 $781.38May 10 (Replanted) 35,077 19.6 183.5 +46.8 $1,023.89 +$242.51

May 10 21,046 18.1 187.5 $1,083.00May 24 (Replanted) 35,077 20.2 205.9 +18.4 $1,146.98 +$63.98

May 24 21,046 19.8 189.8 $1,083.38June 6 (Replanted) 35,077 22.0 198.3 +8.5 $1,089.45 +$6.07

BECK 6272HR™*

March 15 (Normal 1st Planting) 35,077 17.8 98.8 $571.85March 15 21,046 18.2 102.1 $589.32March 29 (Replanted) 35,077 22.1 122.3 +20.2 $661.84 +$72.52

March 29 21,046 22.7 143.3 $801.33April 12 (Replanted) 35,077 20.7 139.7 -3.6 $767.38 -$33.96

April 12 21,046 20.7 123.3 $699.36April 25 (Replanted) 35,077 21.9 162.7 +39.4 $890.02 +$190.67

April 25 21,046 22.7 161.0 $900.31May 10 (Replanted) 35,077 19.0 210.9 +49.9 $1,185.57 +$285.25

May 10 21,046 19.8 203.9 $1,163.86May 24 (Replanted) 35,077 22.1 228.5 +24.6 $1,258.26 +$94.39

May 24 21,046 22.7 204.8 $1,145.24June 6 (Replanted) 35,077 25.9 215.6 +10.8 $1,153.04 +$7.80

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, drying cost of $0.04/point of moisture and $25.00 replant cost.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: To evaluate final corn populations and determine whether is profitable to replant. We use two genetic families at multiple planting dates at high and low populations to determine if replanting would have been beneficial. Replanting can be a tough decision with varying weather conditions from year to year.

49

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Replant Study - Continued

Summary: This year our lowest yielding corn was planted in March and April. Our March 15th planting date suffered severely because of three frost events that occurred after emergence. This was the main reason for the successful March 29th replant. On average, our May replants offered an overall benefit of 34.9 Bu./A. with a net return of $171.53/A. Last year, replanting the low population stands in May resulted in an average loss of 11.1 Bu./A. with a -$90.77 net return. However, this year’s weather pattern shows an advantage for the later planting dates.

-$75.00

-$50.00

-$25.00

$0.00

$25.00

$50.00

$75.00

April 4 - April 14

April 15 - April 30

May 1 - May 13

May 14 - May 28

May 29 - June 9

June 10 - June 25

Net

Ret

urn

Replanting Date

4 Year CINPFR Replant Return/A.

50


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - 2012Location: T1 & T2 plots Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: Various Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: Various Herbicide: Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar, 1 qt. Class Act &Population: 35,077 seeds/A. 32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®,Rows: Four 30” rows 1 qt. Class Act

Purpose: To evaluate performance of BECK 5246HR™* and BECK 6272HR™* planted on several dates throughout the growing season. This enables us to see how planting dates affect corn yield on an annual basis and to compare multi-year averages.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

PlantingDate Brand

HarvestedPopulation

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreMarch 15 BECK 5246HR™* 23,500 17.1 74.9March 15 BECK 6272HR™* 25,000 17.8 98.8

AVERAGE 24,250 17.5 86.9

March 29 BECK 5246HR™* 34,000 19.3 119.3March 29 BECK 6272HR™* 34,000 22.1 122.3

AVERAGE 34,000 20.7 120.8

April 12 BECK 5246HR™* 32,500 19.7 143.3April 12 BECK 6272HR™* 30,500 20.7 139.7

AVERAGE 31,500 20.2 141.5

April 25 BECK 5246HR™* 33,500 19.6 140.4April 25 BECK 6272HR™* 32,000 21.9 162.7

AVERAGE 32,750 20.8 151.5

May 10 BECK 5246HR™* 30,000 19.6 183.5May 10 BECK 6272HR™* 34,000 19.0 210.9

AVERAGE 32,000 19.3 197.2

May 24 BECK 5246HR™* 33,000 20.2 205.9May 24 BECK 6272HR™* 30,000 22.1 228.5

AVERAGE 31,500 21.2 217.2

June 6 BECK 5246HR™* 31,500 22.0 198.3June 6 BECK 6272HR™* 31,000 25.9 215.6

AVERAGE 31,250 24.0 207.0

“Beck’s Escalate seed treatment did a really good job of keeping the seed in condition. My seed laid in the ground for 40 days without germinating and that was the longest any of my seed has ever had to sit in the ground. But when we finally got a rain, I ended up with a very good stand and I like to attribute that to the Escalate.”

David BrosterGrayville, IL

51

Central Indiana PFR

44.25%

103.46% 100.90% 106.26%

102.72% 100.98%

91.76%

100.32%

30.00%

45.00%

60.00%

75.00%

90.00%

105.00%

120.00%

March 15 - March 20

March 21 - April 3

April 4 - April 14

April 15 - April 30

May 1 - May 13

May 14 - May 28

May 29 - June 9

June 10 - June 25

Yiel

d an

d Po

pula

tion

Perc

ent o

f Mea

n

Planting Dates

Corn Planting Dates 2001 - 2012

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - Continued

Summary: We know from past Practical Farm Research that earlier planted corn generally has greater yield potential than later planted corn. The real question is when is it too early to plant? This year the answer for us was March 15th. Our March 15th planting date suffered from frost damage and we lost 30 percent of our stand, which led to our lowest yields. Conversely, our highest yielding planting date was May 24th. This year our May planted corn out-yielded the April corn by an average of 60.7 Bu./A. The bar graph reflects the percent of the average yield for each date range for the past 12 years. The red trend line in the graph represents the percent of harvest population vs. seeds planted. Furthermore, you can see that early planting often results in lower harvest populations. Even with the lower stands, our highest multi-year yields came from the early planted corn.

52


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Sub-Irrigation 20" vs. 30" Rows - 2012Location: S1 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 19, 2012 Tillage: Disk / CultipackerHarvested: September 24, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 20": 39,200 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-D 30": 35,077 seeds/A. Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: 20": Six 20” rows Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

30": Four 30" rowsReplications: Two (averaged)


Test†

Weight

PercentBrokenStalks

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre30" ROWSSUB-IRRIGATEDPhoenix 5642A4** 33,500 58.3 0.0 22.8 210.3BECK 6175AMX™* 32,250 60.3 0.0 23.2 195.2BECK 5435HXR™* 28,250 58.6 0.0 22.5 173.7

AVERAGE 31,333 59.1 0.0 22.8 193.0

NON-IRRIGATEDBECK 6175AMX™* 33,750 62.5 0.0 21.9 136.6Phoenix 5642A4** 33,250 61.5 0.0 21.8 133.7BECK 5435HXR™* 32,000 61.2 0.0 22.4 109.3

AVERAGE 33,000 61.7 0.0 22.0 126.5

30" Row Average 32,167 60.4 0.0 22.4 159.8

20" ROWSSUB-IRRIGATEDPhoenix 5642A4** 33,039 58.2 0.0 22.8 201.1BECK 6175AMX™* 33,414 60.1 0.0 21.9 189.0BECK 5435HXR™* 37,544 60.1 0.0 22.3 174.4

AVERAGE 34,666 59.5 0.0 22.3 188.2

NON-IRRIGATEDBECK 6175AMX™* 35,667 61.2 0.0 23.2 153.3Phoenix 5642A4** 36,418 60.0 0.0 23.7 143.3BECK 5435HXR™* 37,169 60.4 0.0 22.1 113.0

AVERAGE 36,418 60.5 0.0 23.0 136.5

20" Row Average 35,542 60.0 0.0 22.6 162.4

Sub-Irrigated Average 33,000 59.3 0.0 22.6 190.6Non-Irrigated Average 34,709 61.1 0.0 22.5 131.5


Purpose: To be able to control the water table level with a sub-irrigation system in an attempt to increase yield and to compare that data to a non-irrigated system. This year we planted 20” and 30” row spacing in order to compare them in the sub-irrigated vs. non-irrigated system. The sub-irrigation system consists of 3” tile, 24” deep, spaced 15’ apart following the contour of the field typography.

53

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Sub-Irrigation 20" vs. 30" Rows - Continued

Summary: This is the third year for this study; however, this is the second year with a full season of corn growth. With the dry conditions we received this growing season, we pumped water to keep the water table where we wanted it in an attempt to help minimize plant stress and increase yields. All three hybrids, in both row spacings, produced higher yields in the sub-irrigated section compared to the non-irrigated section. When comparing the two row spacings, the 20” rows had a 2.6 Bu./A. advantage. The most amazing aspect of this study is that the sub-irrigated system had an overall 59.1 Bu./A. increase compared to the non-irrigated section this year, which gives us an additional $348.00/A. gross revenue. We are evaluating a monitoring system that will allow us to track water use and more accurately calculate costs. In conclusion, the sub-irrigated system proved to be able to keep the plants healthier and increase our overall yield in both row spacings during this extremely dry growing season.

174.1

111.2

205.7

138.5

192.1

145.0

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

Irrigated Non-Irrigated

Bu./A.

The chart above represents the average of each hybrid in the two row spacings

Sub-Irrigation Study

5435HXR™*

5642A4**

6175AMX™*

54


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - 2012Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 22 & 25, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TinePopulation: 24,000 to 48,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: Four 30” rows Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

Purpose: This study compares 15 hybrids in 20” and 30” row spacing at final populations ranging from 24,000 to 48,000 to evaluate population trends and row width configurations.

30" row 20" row


55

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - Continued

PopulationSummary:

2012 was a very difficult year in terms of getting consistent results and consistent high yields. The 20” versus 30” population study was no exception. The individual hybrid charts on the previous page and the top of this page show how inconsistent the data at this location was. The "All Hybrids" charts in the middle of this page began to smooth out a little bit and start to show trends for the population portion of this data. The highest yields across all hybrids came at 32,000 population in 30” rows and 36,000 population in the 20” rows. When looking at gross return per acre minus seed cost (All Hybrids bar graph above), the optimum populations turned out to be 24,000 in 20” rows and in the 30” rows the 28,000 and 32,000 tied at the top. Overall the 30” rows showed an advantage over the 20” rows when comparing all populations. Keep in mind these populations are final stands as we overplant and thin to a uniform stand.

Summary for20" vs. 30"Rows:

Last year at Central IN PFR the 20” rows out-yielded the 30” rows by 6.1 Bu./A. across all populations and all hybrids. This year was a different story in that the 30” rows rebounded and edged out the 20” rows by 2 Bu./A. across all hybrids and pops. While the 30” rows averaged out better across all populations, the 20” rows maintained a yield advantage at the higher populations. This is a trend we have been seeing over multiple locations and multiple years. As far as selecting specific hybrids that perform better in one system over the other, please contact your seed sales representative as there are many factors that go into this decision. The data collected at this site in 2012 was erratic enough that multi-year and multi-location data should definitely enter into your decision.

30" row 20" row


56


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S zone-Till vs. Conventional-Till Long-TermCorn After Soybeans (Also Fungicide Trial) - 2012

Location: E9 S & E10 S plots Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 24, 2012 Tillage: Zone-Till / Conv.-Till Harvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® & 8 oz. 2Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 4-D (Zone-Till Only)Rows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. Princep

Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar, 1 qt. Class Act32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX, 1 qt. Class Act

Fungicide: 10 oz. Headline AMP®

Purpose: This is the 22nd year for evaluating zone-till vs. conventional-till practices in a corn/soybean rotation. This study was established to evaluate the benefits of applying a VT fungicide application in each tillage practice.

Brand NotesHarvestedPopulation

Test†

WeightPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre

Bu./A.Advantage Headline

Net^Return

zONE-TILL STUDYBECK 6903HR™* Headline AMP® @ Tassel 30,500 49.4 23.5 206.4 +0.9 $1,119.58Phoenix 5552A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 31,000 46.7 21.7 188.7 +3.4 $1,034.76BECK 6733HXR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 30,500 50.2 24.2 187.8 -6.3 $1,010.91Phoenix 5726A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 32,000 48.6 22.6 169.1 +1.1 $918.28

AVERAGE 31,000 48.7 23.0 188.0 -0.2 $1,020.88

BECK 6903HR™* 26,000 49.2 23.5 205.5 $1,142.58BECK 6733HXR™* 30,500 49.8 23.9 194.1 $1,076.09Phoenix 5552A4** 29,500 48.3 20.9 185.3 $1,049.54Phoenix 5726A4** 29,000 47.6 21.9 168.0 $944.83

AVERAGE 28,750 48.7 22.6 188.2 $1,053.26zone-Till Average 29,875 48.7 22.8 188.1 $1,037.07

CONvENTIONAL-TILL STUDYPhoenix 5552A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 25,500 48.2 22.4 148.4 +29.5 $803.63BECK 6903HR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 29,000 49.0 22.9 145.0 +3.9 $781.68Phoenix 5726A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 30,000 47.5 23.5 134.4 +37.6 $719.26BECK 6733HXR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 32,000 50.6 20.9 100.7 -22.8 $542.36

AVERAGE 29,125 48.8 22.4 132.1 +12.1 $711.74

BECK 6903HR™* 29,000 49.2 22.9 141.1 $787.90BECK 6733HXR™* 29,000 48.4 23.3 123.5 $687.65Phoenix 5552A4** 27,500 48.6 20.9 118.9 $673.45Phoenix 5726A4** 27,500 48.0 22.2 96.8 $543.24

AVERAGE 28,250 48.6 22.3 120.1 $673.06Conventional-Till Average 28,688 48.7 22.4 126.1 $692.40

TillageSummary:

Zone-till versus conventional-till corn following soybeans has produced higher corn yields in the zone-till areas for a majority of the last 22 years. This year continued the trend leading to a drastic 62 Bu./A. advantage in the zone-till system. This may be due in part to that fact that we v-ripped in the spring of 2012 instead of the fall of 2011. The soil type where this study is conducted is conducive to reduced tillage practices. This has been proven multiple years throughout the past two decades.

FungicideSummary:

Once again, we looked at an application of Headline AMP at full tassel. We didn’t see a response with the use of a fungicide in the zone-till system. However, we did receive an average advantage of 12.1 Bu./A. across the four hybrids in the conventional-till section. Three out of the four hybrids had a positive yield response to the fungicide application.

TillageSummary:

This year the zone-till method out-yielded conventional-tillage by 55.6 Bu./A., which mirrors our results from last year. A factor could have been that we were forced to spring plow the conventional ground due to a late harvest last year. To make matters worse, we received a very hard rainfall a few days after planting which crusted the conventional-till ground. Therefore, we were faced with ununiform emergence in the conventional ground.

FungicideSummary:

Our results showed a positive average yield with the use of a VT fungicide application. Overall, we have seen a higher response with the use of a fungicide in the corn after corn compared to the corn after soybean rotation. The positive yields provided a $23.17 net return in zone-till and $10.86 net return in conventional-till from a VT fungicide application.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. ^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $6.00 application cost, Headline AMP cost $282.00/gal. and drying cost figured at $0.04/pt. of moisture per bushel.Headline AMP is a registered trademark of BASF. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

57

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S zone-Till vs. Conventional-Till Continuous Corn (Also Fungicide Trial) - 2012

Location: E5 S & E6 S plots Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 24, 2012 Tillage: Zone-Till / Conv.-Till Harvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2, 4-D (Zone-Till Only)Rows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep, 1 qt. Princep, 1 qt. Class Act

Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar, 1 qt. Class Act &32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX

Fungicide: 10 oz. Headline AMP®

Purpose: This study is similar to our long-term zone-till vs. conventional-till study on the previous page with the exception being that this is 9th year continuous corn.

Brand NotesHarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per Acre

Bu./A.Advantage Headline

Net^Return

zONE-TILL STUDYBECK 6903HR™* Headline AMP® @ Tassel 28,500 58.9 26.2 176.2 +8.5 $932.64Phoenix 5552A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 29,000 56.5 24.0 171.2 +22.5 $920.45BECK 6733HXR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 31,000 57.3 25.2 168.5 +10.8 $897.40Phoenix 5726A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 33,000 55.5 23.9 147.9 -0.9 $791.96

AVERAGE 30,375 57.1 24.8 165.9 +10.2 $885.61

BECK 6903HR™* 25,500 58.8 26.1 167.7 $914.97BECK 6733HXR™* 31,500 59.1 24.3 157.7 $871.77Phoenix 5726A4** 27,500 56.2 22.0 148.8 $836.26Phoenix 5552A4** 28,500 54.5 23.5 148.7 $826.77

AVERAGE 28,250 57.1 24.0 155.8 $862.44zone-Till Average 29,313 57.1 24.4 160.9 $874.03

CONvENTIONAL-TILL STUDYPhoenix 5552A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 29,000 57.4 22.4 125.9 +13.1 $677.54BECK 6903HR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 27,000 57.5 21.9 115.7 +0.1 $622.70Phoenix 5726A4** Headline AMP @ Tassel 30,500 56.9 22.3 102.0 +4.3 $544.02BECK 6733HXR™* Headline AMP @ Tassel 29,000 58.7 20.6 91.2 +10.1 $489.65

AVERAGE 28,875 57.6 21.8 108.7 +6.9 $583.48

BECK 6903HR™* 27,000 58.9 23.4 115.6 $643.20Phoenix 5552A4** 27,500 58.1 21.1 112.8 $638.00Phoenix 5726A4** 27,500 54.2 22.2 97.7 $548.29BECK 6733HXR™* 28,000 58.7 20.4 81.1 $460.97

AVERAGE 27,500 57.5 21.8 101.8 $572.62Conventional-Till Average 28,188 57.6 21.8 105.3 $578.05

TillageSummary:

This year the zone-till method out-yielded conventional-tillage by 55.6 Bu./A., which mirrors our results from last year. A factor could have been that we were forced to spring plow the conventional ground due to a late harvest last year. To make matters worse, we received a very hard rainfall a few days after planting which crusted the conventional-till ground. Therefore, we were faced with ununiform emergence in the conventional ground.

FungicideSummary:

Our results showed a positive average yield with the use of a VT fungicide application. Overall, we have seen a higher response with the use of a fungicide in the corn after corn compared to the corn after soybean rotation. The positive yields provided a $23.17 net return in zone-till and $10.86 net return in conventional-till from a VT fungicide application.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. ^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $6.00 application cost, Headline AMP cost $282/gal. and drying cost figured at $0.04/pt. of moisture per bushel.Headline AMP is a registered trademark of BASF. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

58


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Strip-Till vs. Conventional-TillCorn After Soybeans / Corn After Corn Studies - 2012

Location: B2 & B3 plots Previous Crop: Soybeans / CornPlanted: April 10, 2012 Tillage: Strip-Till / Conv.-TillHarvested: September 17, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-D (Strip-Till Only)Rows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. Princep

Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActFall 2010 Fertilizer Analysis: 5.5-26-30

Purpose: This study evaluates the practice of banding fertilizer in a strip-tillage system and broadcasting fertilizer in a conventional-tillage system. This is a long-term study where we compare both corn after soybean and corn after corn crop rotations. The fertilizer blend is a combination of MAP and Potash.

CORN AFTER SOYBEANS

Brand

Fall 2010Lbs. of

Dry Fert./A.HarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreSTRIP-TILL (BANDED DRY FERTILIzER)BECK 6626AMX™* 500 lbs. 32,500 59.2 24.6 130.8Phoenix 5552E** 500 lbs. 33,500 57.8 22.5 125.4BECK 5269HXR™* 500 lbs. 33,500 57.7 21.6 118.9Phoenix 5726A4** 500 lbs. 32,500 57.0 24.8 116.1

AVERAGE 33,000 57.9 23.4 122.8

BECK 6626AMX™* 330 lbs. 33,000 57.5 25.6 126.0Phoenix 5552E** 330 lbs. 32,000 58.3 20.9 115.1BECK 5269HXR™* 330 lbs. 32,500 57.1 19.7 114.6Phoenix 5726A4** 330 lbs. 33,000 53.5 24.9 94.9

AVERAGE 32,625 56.6 22.8 112.7


AVERAGE 32,125 56.8 22.6 120.9Strip-Till Average 32,583 57.1 22.9 118.8

CONvENTIONAL-TILL (BROADCAST FERTILIzER)BECK 6626AMX™* 500 lbs. 31,000 57.2 24.5 139.7Phoenix 5552E** 500 lbs. 32,500 57.3 20.4 122.3BECK 5269HXR™* 500 lbs. 33,500 57.1 20.1 116.2Phoenix 5726A4** 500 lbs. 29,500 54.3 23.2 111.7

AVERAGE 31,625 56.5 22.1 122.5

Phoenix 5552E** 330 lbs. 33,000 57.6 20.9 138.3BECK 6626AMX™* 330 lbs. 31,000 59.2 24.3 136.5Phoenix 5726A4** 330 lbs. 32,000 56.6 24.6 127.8BECK 5269HXR™* 330 lbs. 32,500 57.7 20.9 123.2

AVERAGE 32,125 57.8 22.7 131.5


AVERAGE 32,625 56.8 22.7 124.2Conventional-Till Average 32,125 57.0 22.5 126.1


CORN AFTER CORN

Brand

Fall 2010Lbs. of

Dry Fert./A.HarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreSTRIP-TILL (BANDED DRY FERTILIzER)BECK 5269HXR™* 500 lbs. 31,500 57.0 21.5 126.1Phoenix 5552E** 500 lbs. 31,500 57.6 22.0 116.2Phoenix 5726A4** 500 lbs. 32,000 57.9 23.3 95.5BECK 6626AMX™* 500 lbs. 29,000 58.6 25.6 87.0

AVERAGE 31,000 57.8 23.1 106.2

BECK 6626AMX™* 330 lbs. 30,000 59.8 25.3 105.2BECK 5269HXR™* 330 lbs. 32,500 58.8 22.1 102.2Phoenix 5726A4** 330 lbs. 31,000 57.7 26.3 89.3Phoenix 5552E** 330 lbs. 33,000 57.7 24.2 88.4

AVERAGE 31,625 58.5 24.5 96.3

Phoenix 5552E** 165 lbs. 35,000 58.4 21.6 124.4BECK 5269HXR™* 165 lbs. 32,500 59.0 21.4 123.5BECK 6626AMX™* 165 lbs. 32,000 57.2 25.0 122.7Phoenix 5726A4** 165 lbs. 31,000 55.7 23.1 105.9

AVERAGE 32,625 57.6 22.8 119.1Strip-Till Average 31,750 58.0 23.5 107.2

CONvENTIONAL-TILL (BROADCAST FERTILIzER)Phoenix 5726A4** 500 lbs. 30,500 56.1 23.8 128.4BECK 6626AMX™* 500 lbs. 31,500 58.7 24.6 122.1Phoenix 5552E** 500 lbs. 33,000 56.9 22.6 116.6BECK 5269HXR™* 500 lbs. 31,500 58.0 21.3 72.7

AVERAGE 31,625 57.4 23.1 109.9

Phoenix 5552E** 330 lbs. 33,500 58.0 21.3 145.3Phoenix 5726A4** 330 lbs. 30,000 57.2 23.6 138.6BECK 6626AMX™* 330 lbs. 32,000 57.7 24.8 127.9BECK 5269HXR™* 330 lbs. 29,000 56.6 20.2 113.7

AVERAGE 31,125 57.4 22.5 131.4

BECK 6626AMX™* 165 lbs. 31,000 60.4 24.4 128.6Phoenix 5552E** 165 lbs. 33,000 56.1 22.3 125.9Phoenix 5726A4** 165 lbs. 31,000 56.6 23.9 123.3BECK 5269HXR™* 165 lbs. 31,000 57.1 20.0 115.3

AVERAGE 31,500 57.6 22.7 123.3Conventional-Till Average 31,417 57.5 22.8 121.5

59

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Strip-Till vs. Conventional-TillCorn After Soybeans / Corn After Corn Studies - Continued


Summary: Crop Rotation Summary: The corn after soybean rotation had an overall 8.1 Bu./A. advantage over the corn after corn rotation. This difference was in large part due to the success of BECK 6626AMX™* in the corn after soybean rotation. BECK 6626AMX™* averaged 133.1 Bu./A. factoring in both strip-till and conventional-till ground. Overall, harvest populations were significantly higher in the corn after soybean rotation. This is in part due to the difficulty of working down a spring plowed seed bed with an excessive amount of residue left from previous years. Tillage Summary: Last year’s late harvest did not allow us to work the ground until this March. This spring we were able to work the conventional-till ground twice resulting in a more uniform seed bed as compared to the strip-till. The conventional-till segments produced a higher yield in both crop rotations. The conventional-till out-yielded the strip-till by 7.3 Bu./A. in the corn after soybean environment and 14.3 Bu./A. in the continuous corn environment. Fertilizer Summary: Due to the high fertility rates in these plots we did not fall fertilize this year. The conventional-till ground receiving 330 lbs./A. of dry fertilizer produced the highest yields in both rotations; yielding an average of 131.45 Bu./A. which was higher than anything else in the plot. However, in the strip-till sections, the 330 lbs. rate averaged less than everything else. Summary: When implementing a strip-till system, it is important to have the proper equipment as well as ground. You can be much more accurate in a strip-till system with the use of auto-guidance technology. It can be very difficult to distinguish strip-till areas due to residue moving back into the strips, especially in a corn after corn rotation.

60


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Stress Mitigation Study - 2012Location: A4 W plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: Tent: September 14, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &

Outside Tent: October 1, 2012 8 oz. 2,4-DPopulation: 35,077 seeds/A. Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: Two 30” rows Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

BrandOutside /Under Tent

HarvestedPopulation

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceBECK 5475AMX™* Outside of Tent 32,500 14.9 194.5 +113.3

BECK 5475AMX™* Under Tent 28,000 13.6 81.2

BECK 5444VT3 Outside of Tent 31,000 13.5 189.5 +97.7

BECK 5444VT3 Under Tent 31,000 13.4 92.4

Phoenix 5832A3** Outside of Tent 30,500 18.0 179.2 +89.8

Phoenix 5832A3** Under Tent 30,000 17.8 89.4

Phoenix 5726A4** Outside of Tent 31,000 17.7 161.7 +79.7

Phoenix 5726A4** Under Tent 32,500 16.1 82.0

AvERAGE Outside of Tent 31,250 16.0 181.2 +95.0

AvERAGE Under Tent 30,375 15.2 86.2†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. AQUAmax is a trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Agrisure Artesian is a trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of

Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: The thought of corn hybrids being tolerant to extreme environmental conditions would be a huge contribution to the farming community. Drought tolerant genetics/traits have been a hot topic of discussion the last few years. To study these technologies we constructed a large 40' x 60' tent with a clear vinyl roof to simulate drought stress; this kept the rain away, but allowed the sunlight and heat to reach the corn plants. The tent helped evaluate the use of AQUAmax™ and Artesian™ drought tolerant technologies underneath the tent in drought conditions and outside of the tent in this year’s environment.

Summary: This year it was very evident that we didn’t need a stress tent to have drought stress throughout a huge part of the marketing area, including here at Atlanta. This is shown by the fact that the average yield under the tent was only 86.3 Bu./A. Outside of the tent we saw a drastic average yield increase of 95.1 Bu./A. BECK 5475AMX™* had the highest yield outside of the tent at 194.5 Bu./A. We plan to continue to evaluate drought tolerant technologies and to evaluate how they respond to different environmental conditions. Refer to the corn performance summaries near the front of the book to see more drought tolerant yield results.

61

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Artesian™ & AQUAmax™

Corn After Beans & Corn After Corn Study - 2012Location: 300-5 S Previous Crop: Corn / BeansPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,409 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: 35,077 seeds/A. 32 oz. Roundup PowerMax® & 1 qt. Class ActReplications: Two (averaged)


Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreCORN AFTER BEANSPhoenix 5726A4** 28,750 59.9 28.4 240.4

BECK 5444VT3 27,000 59.8 27.0 238.5

BECK 5475AMX™* 26,500 59.7 25.6 231.7

Phoenix 5832A3** 26,750 59.8 26.4 225.1

AVERAGE 27,250 59.8 26.9 233.9

CORN AFTER CORN

Phoenix 5726A4** 28,250 60.0 28.9 215.5

BECK 5444VT3 28,000 59.7 26.6 211.4

Phoenix 5832A3** 26,250 59.9 27.4 205.1

BECK 5475AMX™* 25,500 59.7 24.8 195.9

AVERAGE 27,000 59.8 26.9 207.0†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Artesian is a trademark of Syngenta Group Company. AQUAmax is a trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto

Technology LLC.

Purpose: To evaluate drought tolerant technologies in a high yield, high fertility soil type. Also, to look at two different crop rotations of corn after beans and corn after corn.

Summary: We evaluated four hybrids, including two with drought tolerant technologies, BECK 5475™* AQUAmax and Phoenix 5832A3** Artesian. May 10th planted corn missed the heat stress during pollination time and late rains in July and August helped in achieving an average yield over 220 Bu./A. Due to these conditions and late planting of this corn, we didn't see an advantage to the use of either drought tolerant technology. However, the corn after soybean rotation out-yielded the corn after corn by over 26 Bu./A. on average. We plan to continue to evaluate drought tolerant technologies, to evaluate how they respond to different evironmental conditions. Refer to the corn performance summaries near the front of the book to see more drought tolerant yield results.

62


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Origin Study - 2012Location: F4 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 13, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 19, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. Princep,Population: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rowsReplications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: With the increasing need to grow seed corn in foreign countries, many customers have voiced their concerns about whether the origin has an effect on the seed. This study was set up to evaluate the difference in seed quality between the United States and South American grown seed corn.

TreatmentHarvested Population

Test†


PercentBrokenStalks

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

AdvantagePhoenix 5385A3**

United States 31,750 57.2 21.4 0.0 66.0 -4.0South America 32,750 58.3 20.6 0.0 70.0

AVERAGE 32,250 57.8 21.0 0.0 68.0

BECK 6077HR™*

United States 31,250 58.5 20.7 0.0 70.7 +10.1South America 34,000 57.8 22.5 0.0 60.6

AVERAGE 32,625 58.2 21.6 0.0 65.6

BECK 5435RR™*

United States 32,500 59.3 22.6 0.7 53.3 -2.2South America 32,750 58.8 22.4 0.0 55.5

AVERAGE 32,625 59.1 22.5 0.4 54.4

United States Origin Average 31,833 58.3 21.6 0.2 63.3 +1.3South America Origin Average 33,167 58.3 21.8 0.0 62.0


Summary: Overall, our results showed a 1.3 Bu./A. advantage for the United States corn. However, the South American corn had higher yields in two of the three individual hybrids. The harvest population was consistently higher in the South American sections, with an overall 1,334 plants/A. advantage. This year our two replications show that there are minimal differences in terms of germination and seed quality.

63

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Corn Seed Treatment - 2012Locaction: E3 Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 7, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 12, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 35,077 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Two 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5642A4**

Replications: Three (averaged)

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcrePercent of Mean

Maxim® Quattro + Avicta® Duo 250 56.8 23.6 111.7 115%Maxim Quattro + Poncho® 500 + CRW + QuickRoots™ 57.5 25.0 109.4 112%Escalate® 56.7 23.3 108.3 111%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 500 + Nematode + QuickRoots 57.5 23.6 107.5 110%Maxim Quattro + Poncho® 1250/VOTiVO® + QuickRoots 57.1 23.9 106.3 109%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 500 + CRW + Nematode + QuickRoots 57.0 23.9 102.6 105%Stamina® F3HL + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO 56.9 23.9 102.4 105%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + Micro King® 57.0 23.9 98.6 101%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + B28 56.7 25.0 96.0 99%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250 57.4 23.7 91.3 94%Untreated 57.6 23.5 90.9 93%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO 58.1 23.9 90.0 92%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + N-Hibit® 56.6 23.8 89.3 92%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + Wuxal® Terios Zn 57.0 24.3 87.3 90%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + QuickRoots (Oil Based) 57.3 24.8 85.0 87%Maxim Quattro + Poncho 1250/VOTiVO + Incotec EL250 57.2 25.3 81.5 84%

AVERAGE 57.2 24.1 97.4†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids. Poncho and VOTiVO are registered trademarks of Bayer. Stamina is a registered trademark of BASF. Micro King is a registered trademark of Agra Solutions,

LLC. Maxim and Avicta are registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. QuickRoots is a trademark of TJ Technologies Inc. N-Hibit is a registered trademark of Plant Health Care, Inc. Wuxal is a registered trademark and manufacturing process under license of Aglukon Spezialdϋnger, Dϋsseldorf, Germany.

Purpose: In this plot, we evaluate many types of seed treatments, such as fungicides, insecticides, biologicals, plant growth stimulants and micronutrients, on Phoenix 5642A4**.

Summary: Seed treatments typically provide small increases in yield that are difficult to measure and be confident in without many locations of data. This is one location, three replication data that evaluates 16 different entries. Escalate performed in the top three of the plot in yield. This year the untreated check yielded 93% of the average leaving five treatments standing below it in yield rank. The erratic weather pattern of the year played a large role in the results of the plot and provided us with a 30 Bu./A. swing on yield.

64


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

Lbs. of NitrogenPercentMoisture

PercentBrokenStalks

HarvestedPopulation

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

Return225 21.1 0.0 32,500 130.6 $619.63200 21.0 0.0 34,000 128.6 $624.62175 20.5 0.0 31,000 138.1 $697.46150 20.2 0.0 32,000 141.8 $736.08125 20.0 0.0 33,000 149.4 $797.71100 19.3 0.0 33,000 143.0 $776.54 0 18.3 0.0 30,000 91.7 $541.03

AVERAGE 20.1 0.0 32,214 131.9 $684.72

BECK’S CAB Nitrogen Rate Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture. *XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. Nitrogen price based on $375/ton 28% liquid nitrogen.

Location: E1 & E2 plots Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 9, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 20, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep, 1 qt. Princep,Population: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 6175AMX™*

Replications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: This study was set up to help gather nitrogen data for a state-wide database coordinated by Purdue University. This is the third year of evaluating nitrogen rates in 25 lb. increments from 100 to 225 in a corn after soybean rotation.

Summary: This year we saw our highest yield at the nitrogen application of 125 lbs. After accounting for the cost of the nitrogen for each entry we found that 125 lbs. was our economic optimum. With the lack of rainfall this growing season, it wasn’t surprising to find that the lower nitrogen rates produced higher returns. For more information on CAB nitrogen rates please refer to pages 228 - 230 for multi-location research data.


PercentBrokenStalks

HarvestedPopulation

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

Return250 24.1 0.0 33,333 145.9 $693.13225 24.5 0.0 32,167 163.7 $814.92200 24.3 0.0 30,500 166.0 $845.28175 24.7 0.0 30,000 159.5 $823.72150 24.1 0.6 29,667 157.4 $828.12125 23.0 0.0 29,833 152.9 $818.360 22.8 0.7 28,000 72.5 $427.75

AVERAGE 23.9 0.2 30,500 145.4 $750.18

BECK’S CAC Nitrogen Rate Study - 2012Location: A6 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 9, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: September 19, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® & 8 oz. 2,4-DPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepRows: Four 30” rows Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActReplications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 6175AMX™*

Purpose: This study was set up in 2006 to help gather nitrogen data for a state wide database coordinated by Purdue University. The past three years, we have evaluated nitrogen rates in 25 lb. increments from 125 to 250 in a corn-after-corn situation.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. Nitrogen price based on $375/ton 28% liquid nitrogen.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

65

Central Indiana PFR

Purpose: Increased input prices have made us re-evaluate the way we fertilize our crops in recent years. In addition to studies that identify the optimum rate of nitrogen fertilizer, it appears that the timing of these applications may also affect the efficiency of the nitrogen applied to a crop. Timings will consist of preplant, 2x2, sidedress, and in season broadcast applications. All treatments in this study received a total of 225 lbs./A. of nitrogen.

BECK’S Nitrogen Timing Study - 2012Location: Field C S plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 25, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: September 19, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep, 1 qt. Princep,Population: 35,077 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3Replications: Two (averaged)


Test†

WeightPercentMoisture Bu./A†

Net^Return

225 LBS. TOTAL N50% Preplant Incorporated UAN f/b 50% Sidedress UAN @ V4 - V5 31,500 57.8 22.8 149.8 $732.9115 gal. Preplant Incorporated UAN f/b Broadcast SuperU® @V6 30,750 58.0 21.6 149.1 $710.5515 gal. Preplant Incorporated UAN f/b Broadcast ESN® @ V6 32,250 57.4 23.0 146.7 $699.33100% Preplant Incorporated UAN 33,000 58.0 23.0 144.5 $701.64100% Sidedress UAN @ V3 28,500 58.4 23.1 141.0 $680.9910 gal. 2x2 UAN f/b Sidedress UAN @ V3 29,750 57.7 22.8 137.1 $657.98100% Sidedress UAN @ V6 30,000 58.3 22.9 133.1 $634.38

AVERAGE 30,821 57.9 22.7 143.0 $692.79†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $375/ton 28% UAN, $710/ton SuperU and $695/ton ESN.SuperU is a registered trademark of AGROTAIN International, LLC. ESN is a registered trademark owned by Agrium Inc.

Summary: This year we received our highest yield and net return from the 50% split preplant and sidedress application. Our two 100% sidedress applications both yielded below the plot average. We also tried something new this year by broadcasting ESN and SuperU at the V6 growth stage. We received an average $704.94/A. return with the two broadcast applications. Similar to previous years, we saw another good advantage to split applications over 100% preplant and 100% sidedress, regardless of timing.

BECK’S CAC Nitrogen Rate Study - ContinuedSummary: This year, 200 lbs. of nitrogen provided the highest yield and return on our investment with $845.28/A. Just

like our CAB nitrogen rate study, the highest nitrogen rate gave us the lowest return on our investment. With the abnormal growing season this year, neither of our nitrogen rate studies trended toward the patterns we have seen for the last few years. For more information on CAC nitrogen rates please refer to pages 228 - 230 for multi-location research data.


Total 13.49 in.

66


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Nitrogen Stabilizer Study - 2012Location: B1 S plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 6, 2012 Tillage: S-TineHarvested: October 15, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepReplications: Three (averaged) Post: 1.67 qt Lexar, 1 qt. Class Act &

32 oz. Roundup PowerMAXProduct Tested: BECK 6077HR™*

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceGrossReturn

Net^Return

Return on Investment

Agrotain Plus® 60.2 19.3 188.6 +10.5 $1,112.74 $1,093.54 +$42.75Nutrisphere-N® 60.7 19.5 183.3 +5.2 $1,081.47 $1,063.36 +$12.57Instinct™ 59.7 19.0 180.9 +2.8 $1,067.31 $1,056.65 +$5.86Control 59.2 19.2 178.1 $1,050.79 $1,050.79

AVERAGE 60.0 19.3 182.7 +6.2 $1,078.08†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net return based on $5.90 corn, Nurisphere $18.11/A., Agrotain Plus $ 19.20/A. and Instinct $10.66/A. Nutrisphere-N is a registered trademark of SFP. Agrotain Plus is a registered trademark of Agrotain International LLC.Instinct is a trademark of Dow AgroSciences. N-Serve is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: Each year many corn growers apply UAN liquid nitrogen in the spring as a part of their nitrogen program. This nitrogen stabilizer study evaluates three products that have the ability to reduce nitrogen losses that can occur. 180 lbs. of nitrogen along with the nitrogen enhancement products where applied over the soil surface and incorporated prior to planting.

Nutrisphere-N® from Specialty Fertilizer Products prevents and reduces volatilization and nitrification of liquid nitrogen fertilizers. Nutrisphere-N controls urease, keeping it from robbing nitrogen or yield potential. Plants can do more with nitrogen in its ammonium form than they can with nitrates. Nutrisphere-N protects nitrogen in its ammonium state before it gets converted, giving a greater return on your nitrogen fertilizer investment. Agrotain® Plus from Agrotain International, also blocks the activity of the naturally occurring enzyme called urease, protecting against volatility losses. Agrotain Plus is a stabilizing agent which keeps nitrogen in the ammonium form for a longer period of time and reduces volatilization, denitrification, and leaching losses. Instinct™ is a nitrogen stabilizer that contains the active ingredient nitripyrin, the same ingredient used in N-Serve®. Instinct is a nitrogen stabilizer for liquid UAN solutions and works to ensure that nitrogen is stablilized in the ammonium form, which is less susceptible to losses from leaching and denitrification. Instinct keeps the soil-dwelling Nitrosomonas bacteria inactive, as this bacterium will attack nitrogen and convert it to nitrates which are prone to losses.

Summary: The use of nitrogen enhancement products provided an average 6.2 Bu./A. increase over the control this year. We saw a positive return per acre on each treatment, however Agrotain Plus provided the largest return on investment at $42.75/A.

67

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Phosphorus Efficiency & Micronutrient Study - 2012Location: A5 NW plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 6, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: September 29, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3GReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 5475AM™*

Purpose: To evaluate phosphorus efficiency and micronutrient products. We tested three products to see if we can gain yield by increasing the availability of phosphorus or micronutrients. AvAIL® Phosphorus Fertilizer Enhancer is a unique formulation designed to minimize fixation and maximize your fertilizer investment. PMAX™ LFS is a phosphate fertilizer additive. When mixed with liquid fertilizers containing phosphate, PMAX LFS increases phosphate efficiency and plant uptake. versaMax™ Corn is a dynamic mixture of nutrients designed to enhance corn production. It includes 8% Nitrogen, 3% Sulfur, 1% Iron, 2% Manganese, and 3% zinc.

PHOSPHORUS EFFICIENCY

TreatmentTest†

WeightPercent Moisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A. +/-Control

Net^Return

Return onInvestment

PMAX™ LFS (22 oz./A. with Starter) 60.3 22.9 216.9 +9.1 $1,260.99 +$34.97

Avail (11 oz./A. with Starter) 59.6 22.3 208.7 +0.9 $1,215.60 -$10.42

Control 60.1 23.2 207.8 ---- $1,226.02 ---- †Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $182.98/gal. Avail and $108.97/gal. P-Max LFS.Avail is a registered trademark of Specialty Fertilizer Products, LLC. PMAX and VersaMax are trademarks of Midtech R&D, Inc.

MICRONUTRIENT STUDY

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A. +/-Control

Net^Return

Return onInvestment

VersaMax Corn (2 qt./A. Starter) 59.2 22.1 219.2 +11.4 $1,283.04 +$57.02

Control 60.1 23.2 207.8 ---- $1,226.02 ----†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $20.48/gal. VersaMax.

PhosphorusSummary:

With corn prices increasing we feel it is important to test as many enhancement products as possible inorder to help increase our overall yields. In this study, we received a slight yield increase from the use of Avail; however, we ended up with a -$10.42/A. return on our investment. With the use of PMAX LFS we were able to increase our return up to $34.97/A. PMAX LFS seems to be a very competitive product and we hope to keep testing it and other similar products in the future.

MicronutrientSummary:

VersaMax corn yielded an additional 11.4 Bu./A. over our control. The positive yield response equated toa $57.02/A. return on our investment. This was the first year for testing VersaMax corn at our CentralIndiana PFR site.

68


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Residue Management Study - 2012Location: G1 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 10, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: September 17, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX &Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Eight 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepReplications: Two (averaged) Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

Product Tested: BECK 5509A3

Purpose: This study is designed to help manage the increasing residue issue many of us are seeing from increased plant populations and/or minimized tillage practices. Res 16™ is a bio-stimulant liquid enzyme that accelerates the decomposition of crop residue by stimulating soil microorganisms to break down organic matter.

TreatmentHarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A. Diff.

Net^Return

Return onInvestment

16 oz. RES 16, .05% surfactant, 17 lbs. AMS/100 gal. 33,250 58.8 23.1 152.5 24.2 $881.27 $124.30

16 oz. RES 16 33,250 59.0 22.3 142.8 14.5 $827.02 $70.0515 gal. 28% 33,500 58.9 23.6 109.1 -19.2 $607.71 -$149.2616 oz. RES 16, 3 lbs. AMS/100 gal., 15 gal 28% 32,750 58.8 23.2 106.5 -21.8 $582.58 -$174.39

Control 33,250 58.5 22.3 128.3 $756.97 AVERAGE 33,200 58.8 22.9 127.8 -0.6 $731.11 -$32.33

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net Return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $76.00/gal. Res 16, $375.00/ton 28%, $18.00/gal. Surfactant, $0.64/lb. AMS, $6.00/A. application cost. Res 16 is a trademark of Bio-Enzyme, LLC.

Summary: This year’s results favor the application of Res 16 except for when it is combined with 28%. When we applied Res 16 by itself and combined with a surfactant and AMS, we received an average return of $88.58/A. The use of 28% resulted in large yield losses that we are not able to explain; therefore we will continue to evaulate this in the future. We plan to make this a long term study with the use of Res 16 by itself and combined with other products and/or practices.

If you are interested in trying RES 16, contact Beck's Hybrids home office at

800-937-2325

69

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Cover Crop Study - 2012Location: H2 Plot Previous Crop: Various Cover CropPlanted: April 24, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide:Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®, 8 oz. 2,4-DPopulation: 35,077 seeds/A. 32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX, 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepReplications: Three (averaged) Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

Product Tested: BECK 6733HXR™*

TreatmentApplication

Rate/A.HarvestedPopulation

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre Cost/A.Net^

ReturnN-Vest® Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass 15 lbs. 27,333 24.5 206.5 $12.00 $1,206.35Soybean Bean Builder Mix 18 lbs. 28,833 23.9 189.9 $21.60 $1,098.81Austrian Winter Peas 35 lbs. 31,667 23.7 182.4 $35.00 $1,041.16GroundHog™ Radish 5 lbs. 30,500 23.7 176.8 $13.00 $1,030.12Crimson Clover 25 lbs. 30,333 23.1 169.6 $35.00 $965.64Corn Champion Mix 15 lbs. 29,833 23.1 164.1 $27.90 $940.29

AVERAGE 29,750 23.7 181.5 $24.08†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on gross return minus cost/A. of cover crop. GroundHog radish is a trademark of Ampac Seed Company. N-Vest is a registered trademark of the Cisco Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This study was started to determine the benefits that cover crops provide to the following year's grain crop. Six cover crops were planted and replicated three times to show the different attributes of each.

GroundHog™ Radish: This radish produces large root masses that can shatter compaction and scavenge nitrogen and nutrients deep within the soil. Radishes can capture up to 150 - 200 lbs. of nitrogen before winter killing.

Beck’s Corn Champion Mix: A combination of Crimson Clover, GroundHog Radish and Appin Turnips. This mix has the ability to produce, store, and release large amounts of nitrogen while also breaking up layers of compaction.

Crimson Clover: An aggressive clover that overwinters well and has the ability to produce large amounts of nitrogen.

Beck’s Soybean Bean Builder Mix: A combination of annual ryegrass, GroundHog Radish and Appin Turnips. This mix is a combination of fibrous roots and tubers, which allows the Soybean Bean Builder Mix to break up layers of compaction. N-vest® Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass Blend: A combination of two deep rooted annual ryegrass varieties with exceptional winter hardiness.

Summary: Due to the mild weather conditions that we experienced this winter the cover crops continued to grow longer into the winter and spring. This allowed them to grow larger than normal, which was a good thing so they could contribute more organic material and nitrogen back into the soil. However, it posed an issue because they were harder to kill and took longer to decompose. Since this is a no-till field that has firm soils, we expected to see a larger response from the tillage action of the radishes. We saw the largest yield increase of 25 Bu./A. compared to the plot average with the use of Annual Ryegrass. We plan to make this into a multi-year study to continue to evaluate the benefits of cover crops.

70


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Tile Drainage Study - 2012Location: T3 & T4 plots Previous Crop: Corn / SoybeansPlanted: April 9, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: Corn: September 24, 2012 Herbicide: Both Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &

Soybeans: October 9, 2012 8 oz. 2,4-DPopulation: Corn: 33,674 seeds/A. Corn Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. Princep

Soybeans: 133,294 seeds/A. Corn Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Various Soybean Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX, Soil Type: Crosby Silt Loam 1 qt. Class Act & 12 oz. Section

Products Tested: Phoenix 5385A3** &BECK 357NR™*

Soybean Tiled PlotBushels†

Per AcreRows Between Tile 66.1Rows Over Tile 65.2Rows Between Tile 65.5Rows Over Tile 62.9Rows Between Tile 63.7Rows Over Tile 64.5Rows Between Tile 63.0Rows Over Tile 62.9Rows Between Tile 54.1

PLOT AVERAGE 63.1

AVERAGE YIELD OVER TILE 63.9AVERAGE YIELD BETWEEN TILE 62.5UN-TILED BLOCK OF SOYBEANS 63.2SOYBEAN BLOCK AVERAGE 63.2

Purpose: This is the seventh year for comparing the yield of corn and soybeans in a tiled versus non-tiled setting. We are also measuring the yield in the three or four rows directly above the tile lines versus the three, four, or five rows between the tile lines.

Corn Tiled PlotPercent Moisture

Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreRows Over Tile 20.5 58.1 143.4Rows Between Tile 20.3 58.6 142.5Rows Over Tile 20.3 58.6 148.4Rows Between Tile 20.5 59.1 157.6

PLOT AVERAGE 20.4 58.6 148.0

AVERAGE YIELD OVER TILE 20.4 58.4 145.9AVERAGE YIELD BETWEEN TILE 20.4 58.9 150.1UN-TILED BLOCK OF CORN 20.0 57.9 174.9CORN BLOCK AVERAGE 20.2 58.3 161.5


Corn Summary:

In comparing the tiled plot to the non-tiled plot, the non-tiled plot has better soil and will typically yield higher. This study will help us determine if we can close the yield gap between the more productive soil and the less productive soil, through the use of tiling. So far we have been unsuccessful; 2009 was the only time when yields were higher in the less productive tiled soil. This year in particular was very productive in the non-tiled plot which out-yielded the tiled by an average of 26.9 Bu./A.

Soybean Summary:

In 2006, 2008 and 2009, soybeans above the tile yielded about 2 Bu./A. more than those planted between tile lines. In 2010 and 2011 the soybeans between the tile averaged 3.2 Bu./A. better than the soybeans with the tile below. This year, the soybeans above the tile yielded 1.4 Bu./A. more than those planted between the tile. When averaged, our tiled section actually yielded nearly the same as the non-tiled. Overall, the non-tiled soybeans have outperformed the tiled by an average of 5.9 Bu./A. over the last seven years. This is most likely due to the significant difference in the soil type, which is similar to what we have observed in the corn study.

71

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

Purpose: To evaluate the application rates and soil amendment properties of Gypsum (Calcium Sulfate) in a conventional-till corn situation. We are looking to evaluate the long-term benefits of applying Gypsum annually. Gypsum can be used to improve soil structure, stabilize nitrogen levels lost to evaporation, and add the micronutrient Sulfur.

BECK’S Corn Gypsum Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: Both hybrids tested in this study showed a negative yield response with the use of gypsum. The yield results that we have seen throughout this five year study shows a greater response in the first two years, which we think can be contributed to the added Sulfur. Up until this year, we have continued to see yield increase with gypsum; however they have been on a downward trend. The lack of rainfall and number of high-degree days the past two years could have something to do with the decreased response of Gypsum we are seeing. It could also be possible that Gypsum may not need to be applied annually in order to retain the benefits.

ApplicationsHarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreNO GYPSUM APPLIEDBECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 28,000 59.2 21.9 208.7BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 24,500 59.8 27.0 231.0

AVERAGE 26,250 59.5 24.5 219.8

GYPSUM APPLIED^BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics) 26,000 59.4 21.6 177.6BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 24,500 60.1 25.2 212.9

AVERAGE 25,250 59.8 23.4 195.3

^Gypsum applied in 2008 - 1,600 lbs., 2009 - 800 lbs., 2010 - 1,000 lbs., 2011 - 1,000 lbs. and 2012 - 1,000 lbs.

Location: 300-5 N Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,409 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act Rows: Six 30” rows 32 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &

1 qt. Class ActProducts Tested: BECK EX 0251 (5114 Genetics)

BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™*

72


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

YieldRank Brand

HarvestedPopulation

Test†


PercentBrokenStalks

Bushels†

Per Acre7 Year Average

'99-'01, '03, '06, '08, '12BED ASH (CALCIUM SULFATE)

1 BECK 6175AMX™* 26,500 59.8 25.9 0.0 207.12 Phoenix 5642A4** 24,500 59.7 27.0 2.0 195.43 BECK 6077AM™* 27,000 59.6 24.0 0.0 195.04 BECK 5475AMX™* 27,500 59.8 26.5 0.0 170.0

AVERAGE 26,375 59.7 25.9 0.5 191.9 202.3HIGH CALCIUM LIME

1 Phoenix 5642A4** 32,500 59.9 27.4 0.0 224.52 BECK 6077AM™* 28,500 59.8 25.5 1.8 214.73 BECK 6175AMX™* 28,000 59.6 24.3 0.0 212.04 BECK 5475AMX™* 25,500 59.6 24.9 0.0 207.4

AVERAGE 28,625 59.7 25.5 0.4 214.6 213.9HIGH MAGNESIUM LIME

1 BECK 5475AMX™* 26,000 59.5 24.1 0.0 187.12 Phoenix 5642A4** 26,000 59.5 25.4 0.0 169.93 BECK 6077AM™* 27,500 59.7 24.1 0.0 151.44 BECK 6175AMX™* 28,000 59.6 24.4 0.0 144.4

AVERAGE 26,875 59.6 24.5 0.0 163.2 197.9

BECK’S Corn Lime Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Location: 300-6 S plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: October 4, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qt. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,409 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30" rows 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® &

1 qt. Class ActInsecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

Purpose: This study compares four corn hybrids planted where 3 ton/A. of the following lime types were applied in the Spring of 1998 and Fall of 2010: High Calcium Lime, High Magnesium Lime and Bed Ash (Calcium Sulfate).

SOIL TEST RESULTS (LBS./A.) pH P K Mg Ca C.E.C.SPRING 1999 Bed Ash 7.4 178 550 800 5,400 17.0

High Calcium 7.2 148 310 638 4,968 15.0High Magnesium 7.6 176 464 778 5,292 17.0

SPRING 2000 Bed Ash 7.7 210 428 788 4,752 16.0High Calcium 7.5 202 384 680 5,400 17.0

High Magnesium 7.3 160 332 616 4,860 15.0SPRING 2001 Bed Ash 7.5 218 398 526 5,474 16.0



High Magnesium 6.9 188 408 518 4,416 14.0FALL 2006 Bed Ash 7.4 118 384 510 4,032 12.7



High Magnesium 6.8 92 274 410 2,600 8.8FALL 2010 Bed Ash 7.7 62 123 215 2,100 12.6


FALL 2012 Bed Ash 7.8 70 114 215 2,350 13.8High Calcium 7.9 72 144 215 1,950 11.9

High Magnesium 7.4 41 117 285 1,800 11.7Soil test conducted by A&L Great Lakes Labs, Inc.

73

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Lime Study - ContinuedSummary: This year’s study produced the highest yields in the High Calcium Lime environment, which is consistent

with our seven year average. When looking at the individual hybrids, they all seemed to have different yield responses to each of the lime types. Phoenix 5642A4** seemed to be the most consistent with an overall average of 196.6 Bu./A., which out-yielded the other varieties in the plot. Overall, our seven year average shows the High Calcium Lime environment having a 11.6 Bu./A. advantage over Bed Ash, and a 16.0 Bu./A. advantage over High Magnesium Lime.

74


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

Location: N4 plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 24, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: September 24, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepPopulation: 33,674 seeds/A. Post: 1.67 qts. Lexar & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows Insecticide: Force 3G on non-RW hybrids

BECK’S Quality Traits Products® - 2012

Quality Trait

Product BrandHarvestedPopulation

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcrePotential

PremiumsFood Grade BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 31,000 59.9 21.3 190.6

Food Grade$0.25

Food Grade BECK 5475AMX™* 31,000 57.0 21.0 184.6Food Grade BECK 5246HR™* 30,000 58.7 20.7 180.9Food Grade BECK 6626AMX™* 31,500 60.2 23.0 138.8Food Grade BECK 6111HXR™* 29,000 58.4 21.2 137.6Food Grade BECK 6272HR™* 31,000 60.6 20.9 127.0

Waxy BECK 5354wx™* 25,000 55.3 22.8 226.1

Waxy$0.70

Waxy BECK 5435wx™* 28,500 56.4 22.3 223.2Waxy BECK 6077wx™* 30,000 50.7 24.3 221.7Waxy BECK 6175wx™* 31,500 55.3 22.8 210.9Waxy BECK 5774VT3wx 32,500 57.4 22.4 192.3Waxy BECK 5335HXRwx™* 33,500 60.4 21.6 187.6Waxy BECK 5323VT3wx 28,000 57.8 22.4 168.2Waxy BECK 6187wx™* 29,000 58.2 23.0 164.8

White BECK EX 0283 32,000 58.9 24.5 223.2White$1.00White BECK EX 0284 31,500 62.0 24.9 215.7

White BECK EX 0282 27,500 57.3 22.4 174.8AVERAGE 30,147 57.9 22.4 186.4

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Purpose: This study shows the Quality Trait Products Beck’s is testing and/or offering for sale. Our purpose is to evaluate the products that are the most profitable for our customers.

Food Grade Corn - Used by dry millers to produce cereal and snack food products. The endosperm is much harder than commodity corn and is higher in test weight.

Waxy Corn - Unlike normal corn, it does not contain any amylose starch, only amylopectin. It is used by processors to produce specialty starches used in food and industrial products.

White Corn - Used primarily for tortillas and tortilla chips. A pale, white color is important as well as having a hard endosperm similar to yellow FG hybrids.

Quality Trait Products® is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.

Purpose: To find hybrids that combine high tonnage along with excellent nutritional quality. This combination produces the highest pounds of milk per acre as calculated by the Milk 2006 Program developed by the University of Wisconsin. The pounds of milk per acre data combines the yield in tons with the nutritional data to form one easy to understand number.

75

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Corn Silage Study - 2012

Brand

Lbs.of

Milk/A.Lbs. of

Milk/TonPercentMoisture

65% Moist.

Tons/A. ADF NDF

Adj.Crude Protein Starch

Crude Fat NEL NEG

Phoenix 6442A4** 24,567 3,005 54.3 22.9 20.4 36.7 7.4 38.6 3.0 0.81 0.54BECK 6175AMX™* 23,874 3,018 53.9 21.9 20.5 36.8 7.5 39.0 3.2 0.82 0.55BECK 6077HR™* 23,584 2,929 55.0 22.7 21.4 37.7 7.5 37.3 3.0 0.80 0.53BECK 7988BR 22,991 2,908 53.3 21.8 21.7 38.9 7.6 37.0 2.7 0.79 0.52BECK 8603HR™* 22,889 2,896 54.6 22.2 21.9 38.6 7.4 37.0 2.8 0.79 0.52BECK 6272HR™* 22,647 2,915 55.0 21.6 21.4 37.6 7.4 36.6 2.9 0.80 0.53Phoenix 5642A4** 22,592 2,948 54.2 21.5 21.0 37.6 7.3 38.7 3.0 0.80 0.54BECK 5246HR™* 22,565 2,954 53.4 20.9 20.5 36.7 7.4 38.9 2.9 0.81 0.54Phoenix 5726A4** 22,245 2,964 53.6 20.8 20.5 36.4 6.9 39.5 3.0 0.81 0.54Phoenix 6948A3** 22,081 2,952 54.8 20.9 20.5 36.5 7.3 39.7 3.0 0.81 0.54Phoenix 5385A3** 22,052 2,946 54.8 20.9 19.8 34.9 7.4 39.8 2.9 0.81 0.54BECK EX 0093 22,049 2,929 54.3 20.9 21.7 38.2 7.7 36.0 2.8 0.80 0.53BECK 5475AMX™* 21,947 2,984 52.3 20.1 20.9 37.0 7.5 38.9 3.0 0.81 0.54BECK 6626AMX™* 21,938 2,986 54.3 20.5 20.9 37.3 7.7 37.6 3.2 0.81 0.54BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 21,648 2,834 54.9 21.5 22.7 39.0 7.5 34.7 2.8 0.78 0.51BECK 6903HR™* 20,724 2,889 55.6 20.2 21.3 37.9 7.5 36.8 3.0 0.80 0.53BECK EX 0240 20,467 2,925 53.1 19.3 21.7 38.8 7.4 37.1 2.9 0.79 0.53BECK 6733HXR™* 20,405 2,877 55.5 20.1 22.3 39.1 7.7 34.9 2.9 0.79 0.52


ADF Acid Detergent Fiber Includes cell wall portions made up of cellulose and lignin. As ADF increases, digestibility decreases.

NDF Neutral Detergent Fiber Includes ADF plus hemicellulose. As NDF increases, dry matter intake will generally decrease.

NEL Net Energy of Lactation An estimate of energy in feed available for lactating animals.NEG Net Energy for Gain An estimate of energy in feed available for non-lactating

animals.Pounds of Milk/A. & Ton Calculated using the University of Wisconsin’s Milk 2006

Program.

Top Five Hybrids for SilageNorth Rm (Days) Central Rm (Days) South Rm (Days)

BECK 6175AMX™* 112 BECK 6175AMX™* 112 Phoenix 6442A4** 113BECK 6077AM™* 111 Phoenix 6442A4** 113 BECK 7988BR 117Phoenix 6442A4** 113 BECK 6077AM™* 111 BECK 8603HR™* 118Phoenix 5385A3** 108 BECK 6272HR™* 112 BECK 6272HR™* 112BECK 5246HR™* 105 Phoenix 5726A4** 111 BECK 6077HR™* 111

Summary: Beck's continues to not only look at tonnage, but also take into account the nutritional factors that contribute to silage quality. All of the tested hybrids are excellent for corn silage. Use the above chart to make selections for your specific geography.

76


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Root Growth Study - 2012Location: S1 (S) plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 19, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: September 24, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 33,674 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Four 30” rows Pre: 2.3 qts. Bicep & 1 qt. PrincepReplications: Two (averaged) Post: 1.67 qt. Lexar & 1 qt. Class Act

Product Tested: Phoenix 5726A4**

TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnReturn on Investment

1 qt. Start Right 25.4 159.3 +14.3 $923.37 $67.872/3 qt. Soil Plus II 26.1 153.1 +8.1 $888.29 $32.79Control 25.0 145.0 ---- $855.50 ----

AVERAGE 25.5 152.5 +11.2 $889.05 $50.33†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $54.00/gal. Soil Plus II, $42.00/gal. Start Right and $6.00/A. application cost.Soil Plus II is a trademark of Cropchem Research, Inc. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This study was designed to test different products to help with root growth and plant development. Soil Plus II™ is a unique combination of plant substances in a humic acid base intended for root growth by providing supplemental plant nutrients. Soil Plus II contains 5% nitrogen, 10% phosphorus, 5% potash, and 0.6% zinc. Soil Plus II is distributed by Cropchem in Decatur, IL. Start Right is a proprietary formulation of major and micronutrients sequestered in concentrated organic acids. It is fortified with proprietary plant extracts, enzymes and select soil bacteria. It is for use on all crops at planting or early sidedressing.

Summary: This year’s results show an average $50.33/A. advantage from the two products when compared to our control. This is the first year for testing Start Right and the second year for Soil Plus II. Our two year average return on invest for Soil Plus II is $24.46/A. After analyzing this year’s data, we plan to continue testing these products in order to compare multi-year data.

Farmers are achieving a high level of success with a particular hybrid, despite the drought this season. Due to an anonymous tip online at, www.SuspectOfSuccess.com, investigators have identified the culprit as BECK 6175AMTM*

Beck’s Hybrids is a family-owned and operated seed company that serves farmers in Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Michigan and Kentucky. According to a recent media survey, Beck’s ranks as the sixth largest seed company in the United States.

.

Comparisons suggest BECK 6175AMTM* beats the competition by 15 Bu./A.** Agronomics reveal this product excels in a wide variety of eld environments. To help capture BECK 6175AM,TM* call our tip line at 1.800.937.2325.

BECK 6175AMTM* DELIVERS +15Bu./A.THE DELIVERSRS

78


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

YieldRank Brand

PlantHeight

(Inches)

PodHeight

(Inches)

Standability 1 = Erect5 = Flat

Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK 297NL 44.0 4.0 2.0 76.62 BECK 241NR™* 42.0 3.0 2.0 75.73 BECK 263NR™* 48.0 4.0 2.0 75.44 BECK 265NL 44.0 4.0 2.0 68.45 BECK 276NL 48.0 4.0 2.0 68.36 BECK 294NR™* 48.0 4.0 3.0 63.1

AVERAGE 45.7 3.8 2.2 71.3

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 306NL 44.0 4.0 3.0 73.32 BECK 375NR™* 48.0 4.0 3.0 70.13 BECK 335NR™* 52.0 5.0 3.0 67.74 BECK 313NL 44.0 4.0 2.0 66.55 BECK 431N 50.0 4.0 1.0 66.26 BECK 319N 40.0 3.0 2.0 65.17 BECK 389N 46.0 4.0 2.0 64.78 BECK 325NR™* 45.0 4.0 2.0 64.59 BECK 418NR™* 48.0 4.0 3.0 63.0

10 BECK 372NL 40.0 4.0 2.0 62.911 BECK 348NR™* 48.0 3.0 3.0 61.012 BECK 331N 42.0 3.0 2.0 59.813 BECK 386NL 46.0 3.0 2.0 59.714 BECK 368NR™* 48.0 4.0 3.0 57.515 BECK 432NR™* 48.0 4.0 2.0 56.716 BECK 414N 46.0 4.0 2.0 56.417 BECK 356NL 40.0 4.0 2.0 56.118 BECK 398NR 46.0 4.0 2.0 55.3

AVERAGE 45.6 3.8 2.3 62.6

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - Office - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Location: N2 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 9, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: October 12, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 128,537 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Basagran (twice), 3 oz. Raptor,Rows: Three 30" rows 1 qt. Class Act, 1 pt. 28% &

12 oz. Section 2EC (twice)

79

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - Arcadia - 2012Location: 1/2 Mile West of Arcadia Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 133,294 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX®, Rows: Four 30” rows 1 qt. Class Act & 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged)

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 37.0 3.5 2.0 68.82 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 43.0 3.0 2.8 66.93 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 32.0 3.0 3.3 65.54 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 39.0 4.0 2.0 64.85 BECK 229NR™* 2.3 35.0 3.0 2.5 57.96 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 35.0 3.0 2.3 57.0

AVERAGE 36.8 3.3 2.5 63.5

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK EX 6147™* 3.5 41.0 3.0 2.8 68.72 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 42.0 3.0 2.8 68.33 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 44.0 2.5 3.0 67.84 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 45.0 3.5 2.3 67.15 BECK EX 6145™* 3.4 43.0 3.5 2.3 67.16 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 40.0 3.0 2.8 66.97 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 44.0 3.5 3.0 65.18 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 44.0 3.0 2.5 64.59 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 46.0 3.0 3.0 63.9

10 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 43.0 3.0 3.0 63.811 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 45.0 3.5 2.3 63.512 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 46.0 3.0 3.0 61.513 BECK 398NR 3.9 45.0 3.0 2.8 58.714 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 47.0 3.0 2.8 58.715 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 42.0 3.0 2.8 58.516 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 39.0 3.0 2.3 57.317 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 44.0 3.0 2.5 56.6

AVERAGE 43.5 3.1 2.7 63.4†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

80


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - Atlanta - 2012Location: SR 19 West of Atlanta Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 9, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 16, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 133,294 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX®, Rows: Four 30” rows 1 qt. Class Act & 12 oz. Section 2EC

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 26.0 2.0 3.0 70.22 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 30.0 2.0 2.0 67.53 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 32.0 3.0 2.0 67.44 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 38.0 4.0 3.0 65.95 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 28.0 2.0 2.0 62.06 BECK 229NR™* 2.3 24.0 2.0 2.5 61.4

AVERAGE 29.7 2.5 2.4 65.7

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 44.0 3.0 2.5 75.72 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 40.0 3.0 2.0 72.73 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 32.0 2.0 2.0 71.74 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 42.0 3.0 2.0 71.55 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 36.0 3.0 3.0 69.86 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 34.0 3.0 3.0 69.77 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 44.0 3.0 2.5 68.98 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 36.0 3.0 2.0 68.79 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 44.0 3.0 2.0 68.7

10 BECK 398NR 3.9 44.0 3.0 2.5 68.511 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 40.0 4.0 3.5 68.112 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 44.0 3.0 2.5 67.913 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 34.0 2.0 3.0 66.914 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 42.0 3.0 2.0 66.915 BECK EX 6147™* 3.5 34.0 3.0 2.0 66.416 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 44.0 3.0 2.5 64.9

AVERAGE 39.6 2.9 2.4 69.2†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

81

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S 15" Show Plot & Specialty Beans - 2012Location: N3 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 9, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 11, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 153,884 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Basagran (twice), 3 oz. Raptor,Rows: Five 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act, 1 pt. 28% &

12 oz. Section 2EC (twice)

YieldRank Brand

Special Characteristic

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)Bushels†

Per Acre

Two Yr.Average'11 - '12

GROUP II1 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 44.0 4.0 77.3 72.02 BECK 297NL 2.9 38.0 3.0 77.0 ----3 BECK EX 6139 2.9 46.0 3.0 74.8 ----4 BECK 265NL 2.6 38.0 3.0 59.0 ----

AVERAGE 41.5 3.3 72.0 72.0

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 48.0 4.0 76.2 ----2 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 48.0 4.0 76.0 ----3 BECK 331N Traditional (Non-GMO) 3.3 48.0 4.0 75.3 72.84 BECK 372NL 3.7 48.0 4.0 72.6 68.45 BECK 356NL 3.5 42.0 4.0 70.9 65.06 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 48.0 4.0 70.5 73.27 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 42.0 4.0 68.9 ----8 BECK 319N Traditional (Non-GMO) 3.1 48.0 4.0 68.2 64.69 BECK 398NR 3.9 48.0 4.0 67.8 72.3

10 BECK 389N Traditional (Non-GMO) 3.8 42.0 4.0 67.4 ----11 BECK 313NL 3.1 42.0 4.0 66.4 ----12 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 48.0 4.0 66.3 66.013 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 48.0 4.0 65.1 ----14 BECK 306NL 3.0 42.0 4.0 64.1 ----15 BECK 431N Traditional (Non-GMO) 4.3 46.0 4.0 63.7 ----16 BECK 327 Traditional (Non-GMO) 3.2 48.0 4.0 61.5 ----17 BECK 414N Traditional (Non-GMO) 4.1 42.0 3.0 60.8 ----18 BECK 386NL 3.8 42.0 4.0 55.8 ----

AVERAGE 45.6 3.9 67.6 68.9†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

82


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 20" Soybean Show Plot - 2012Location: Hoch S plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 14, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 28, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 142,000 seeds/A. Post Both: 1 qt. Basagran, 1 pt. 28% &Rows: Six 20” rows 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged) Post RR: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® &

1 qt. Class ActPost LL: 1 qt. Basagran, 1 qt. Class Act &

12 oz. Section 2EC

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK EX 6216 2.8 44.0 3.5 1.8 82.02 BECK 265NL 2.6 41.0 3.0 1.5 75.63 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 38.0 3.0 1.5 75.24 BECK 297NL 2.9 41.0 3.0 1.8 75.05 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 33.0 2.0 1.8 73.76 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 46.0 4.0 1.5 73.77 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 39.0 3.0 1.5 72.58 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 34.0 2.0 1.3 68.69 BECK 229NR™* 2.3 38.0 3.0 1.5 67.5

10 BECK 276NL 2.7 43.0 3.0 1.8 63.3AVERAGE 39.7 3.0 1.6 72.7

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 313NL 3.1 41.0 3.0 2.3 80.02 BECK 306NL 3.0 45.0 4.0 1.8 79.43 BECK 423NL 4.2 49.0 3.5 2.5 76.94 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 48.0 3.5 2.8 76.85 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 47.0 4.0 2.3 76.66 BECK 372NL 3.7 48.0 3.5 3.0 76.47 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 47.0 3.5 3.0 75.88 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 46.0 3.5 2.3 75.29 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 45.0 3.0 2.5 74.7

10 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 48.0 3.0 2.8 74.211 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 47.0 4.0 2.5 73.612 BECK 398NR 3.9 44.0 3.0 2.5 73.113 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 45.0 3.5 2.3 72.714 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 44.0 3.5 2.3 69.215 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 47.0 3.5 2.3 69.016 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 50.0 4.0 2.5 67.417 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 49.0 4.0 3.0 67.218 BECK 386NL 3.8 45.0 3.0 2.5 63.719 BECK 356NL 3.5 48.0 3.5 2.8 62.720 BECK 456NL 4.5 51.0 4.0 2.5 60.6

AVERAGE 46.7 3.5 2.5 72.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

83

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S 30" Soybean Show Plot - 2012Location: Hoch N plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 14, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 28, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 133,294 seeds/A. Post Both: 1 qt. Basagran, 1 pt. 28% &Rows: Four 30” rows 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged) Post RR: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® &

1 qt. Class ActPost LL: 1 qt. Basagran, 1 qt. Class Act &

12 oz. Section 2EC

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK EX 6216 2.8 45.0 3.0 1.5 81.62 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 45.0 3.0 2.5 75.23 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 32.0 2.0 2.0 74.14 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 40.0 2.0 2.0 73.95 BECK 265NL 2.6 40.0 3.0 1.5 73.96 BECK 297NL 2.9 40.0 2.5 2.0 72.97 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 38.0 2.0 1.5 72.78 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 35.0 2.0 1.5 69.19 BECK 229NR™* 2.3 36.0 2.0 1.8 64.8

10 BECK 276NL 2.7 44.0 3.0 1.5 64.4AVERAGE 39.5 2.5 1.8 72.3

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 313NL 3.1 42.0 3.0 3.0 77.42 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 47.0 3.5 2.8 76.53 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 47.0 3.0 2.8 75.74 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 47.0 3.0 2.8 74.75 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 44.0 3.0 2.8 74.66 BECK 306NL 3.0 47.0 4.0 2.0 73.77 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 48.0 3.0 3.5 73.68 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 46.0 3.5 2.5 73.49 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 47.0 3.5 2.5 73.3

10 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 44.0 3.0 2.3 72.411 BECK 398NR 3.9 42.0 3.0 2.3 72.312 BECK 372NL 3.7 48.0 4.0 3.0 72.313 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 45.0 3.0 2.8 71.914 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 49.0 3.5 2.8 69.515 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 48.0 4.0 2.5 69.416 BECK 423NL 4.2 49.0 4.0 2.8 66.317 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 41.0 3.0 2.5 65.918 BECK 386NL 3.8 44.0 3.0 2.3 65.719 BECK 356NL 3.5 46.0 3.0 2.5 65.020 BECK 456NL 4.5 51.0 4.0 3.0 56.1

AVERAGE 46.1 3.4 2.7 80.0†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

84


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - US 31 - 2012Location: US 31 Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: October 11, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Population: 153,884 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX (twice), Rows: Eleven 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act (twice) &

12 oz. Section 2EC

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 38.0 3.0 1.5 79.22 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 40.0 3.0 2.0 71.63 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 36.0 3.0 1.5 69.94 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 38.0 3.0 1.5 68.35 BECK 362NR™* 3.6 34.0 4.0 1.5 66.76 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 42.0 3.0 2.0 65.77 BECK 398NR 3.9 36.0 3.0 1.5 63.68 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 36.0 4.0 1.5 63.59 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 36.0 3.0 1.5 62.5

10 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 38.0 3.0 1.5 59.6AVERAGE 37.0 3.0 1.6 67.1

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

BECK’S LibertyLink Show Plot - 2012Location: A4 E plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 9, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: October 12, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX &Population: 153,884 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Eleven 15” rows Pre: 10 oz. Domain

Post: 1 qt. Liberty & 1 qt. Class Act

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK EX 6216 2.8 42.0 2.0 1.5 76.32 BECK 297NL 2.9 34.0 2.0 1.5 74.03 BECK 313NL 3.1 40.0 3.0 1.5 71.84 BECK EX 6189 3.4 42.0 3.0 1.5 70.15 BECK 265NL 2.6 36.0 2.0 1.5 68.46 BECK 372NL 3.7 44.0 3.0 2.0 67.27 BECK EX 6210 3.9 38.0 3.0 2.0 59.18 BECK 386NL 3.8 40.0 3.0 1.5 56.2

AVERAGE 39.5 2.6 1.6 67.9†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.


Total 13.49 in.

85

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Escalate® vs Untreated - 2012Location: L2 plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: April 6, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 9, 2012 Herbicide: Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® (twice), Population: 160,040 seeds/A. 1 qt. Class Act (twice) & Rows: Five 15” rows 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: This study compares six different varieties of Escalate treated soybeans with untreated soybeans in early April planting conditions. In this study we evaluate seed emergence, standability, and other plant characteristics.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: This year Escalate yield enhancement system had a very favorable yield advantage of 7.8 Bu./A. when compared to the untreated version of the same genetics. Individually, all 6 varieties show an increase with the treatment of our Escalate yield enhancement system. For comparison sake, we have included 15 years of data evaluating the use of Sure Gro (fungicides applied to the seed to protect seedling health, stands and yield). As you can see, Escalate, which includes seed-applied insecticide, has really provided extra yield punch while maintaining increased population and seedling health from the fungicides.

Emerged Population Bushels Per Acre Escalate Advantage

Bu./A.Brand Escalate Untreated Escalate UntreatedBECK 289NR™* 124,872 107,448 50.6 40.6 +10.0BECK 294NR™* 130,680 120,516 59.3 44.9 +14.4BECK 325NR™* 130,680 132,132 67.7 62.3 +5.4BECK 375NR™* 113,256 116,160 76.5 75.5 +1.0BECK 398NR 126,324 133,584 72.3 67.0 +5.3BECK 432NR™* 130,680 121,968 76.6 65.7 +10.9

AVERAGE 126,082 121,968 67.2 59.3 +7.8

†

The three years of Escalate yield enhancement system complements the 15 year long fungicide data very well.

Advantage for Sure Gro

Year Planting Date Final Population Bu./A. 1995 April 26 +35,000 +2.2

1996 April 18 +6,000 +3.3

1997 April 17 +8,000 +0.3

1998 April 13 +29,000 -0.6

1999 April 12 -2,000 +0.2

2000 April 1 +23,000 +2.3

2001 April 3 +10,000 +2.0

2002 April 17 +2,000 +0.7

2003 April 2 -4,000 +1.7

2004 April 5 0 -1.4

2005 April 5 -1,600 +0.4

2006 April 10 -5,373 +2.1

2007 April 3 +8,712 +1.9

2008 April 17 +5,523 -0.3

2009 April 25 +16,263 +1.2

AVERAGE +8,702 +1.1

Advantage for Escalate

Year Planting Date Final Population Bu./A. 2010 2011 2012

April 2 May 10 April 6

AVERAGE

+4,356 +3,630 +4,114 +4,033

+3.9 +4.6 +7.8 +5.4

The two years of Escalate yield enhancement system complements the 15 year long fungicide data very well.

Advantage for Sure Gro

Year Planting Date Final Population Bu./A. 1995 April 26 +35,000 +2.2

1996 April 18 +6,000 +3.3

1997 April 17 +8,000 +0.3

1998 April 13 +29,000 -0.6

86


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Location: No-Till: H4 & H5 plots Previous Crop: CornConv.: 300-3 N & 300-4 N plots Tillage: No-Till / Conv.-Till

Planted: May 10, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Harvested: No-Till: October 13, 2012 & 8 oz. 2,4-D (No-Till only)Conv.: October 9, 2012 Both Pre: 10 oz. Domain

Population: 153,884 seeds/A. Both Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX, Rows: Five 15" rows 1 qt. Class Act &Soil Type: MP: Miami Silt Loam 12 oz. Section 2EC

HP: Shoals Silt Loam & Miami Silt Loam

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreAdvantage in MP Soil

MP SOIL - NO-TILL (TWO REPLICATIONS)1 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 41.0 3.0 2.0 82.5 +21.92 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 32.0 2.5 1.8 82.4 +15.63 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 39.0 3.0 1.8 80.5 +15.94 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 36.0 3.0 1.8 80.2 +8.95 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 38.0 3.0 1.8 77.1 +14.16 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 31.0 2.5 1.5 76.7 +5.17 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 40.0 3.0 2.0 76.1 +17.88 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 41.0 3.5 2.0 75.1 +6.39 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 41.0 3.5 2.3 73.9 +5.4

10 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 39.0 3.5 2.0 73.9 +9.611 BECK EX 6145™* 3.4 39.0 3.0 2.0 73.8 +10.112 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 37.0 3.0 2.3 73.8 -2.113 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 39.0 3.0 2.0 73.2 +13.414 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 39.0 3.0 2.0 70.9 +14.915 BECK 398NR 3.9 36.0 3.0 2.0 70.3 +16.416 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 37.0 3.0 2.3 70.3 +6.517 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 29.0 2.0 1.8 68.5 +8.318 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 42.0 3.5 2.3 66.9 +4.719 BECK EX 6147™* 3.5 37.0 3.0 2.0 65.9 -0.520 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 43.0 3.5 2.0 61.9 +8.0

AVERAGE 37.8 3.0 2.0 73.7 +10.0HP SOIL - CONvENTIONAL-TILL (ONE REPLICATION)

1 BECK EX 6212™* 3.2 48.0 5.0 3.0 75.92 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 36.0 3.0 2.0 71.63 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 40.0 4.0 2.0 71.34 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 50.0 3.0 3.0 68.85 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 58.0 4.0 3.5 68.56 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 40.0 3.0 2.0 66.87 BECK EX 6147™* 3.5 52.0 3.0 3.0 66.48 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 48.0 5.0 3.0 64.69 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 52.0 4.0 4.0 64.3

10 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 52.0 4.0 3.0 63.811 BECK EX 6145™* 3.4 54.0 4.0 3.5 63.712 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 48.0 4.0 3.0 63.013 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 52.0 4.0 3.5 62.214 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 50.0 4.0 3.5 60.615 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 36.0 3.0 2.0 60.216 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 50.0 4.0 3.0 59.817 BECK EX 6214™* 3.4 56.0 4.0 3.5 58.318 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 52.0 4.0 3.0 56.019 BECK 398NR 3.9 48.0 4.0 3.0 53.920 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 52.0 4.0 3.0 53.9

AVERAGE 49.0 3.9 2.9 63.7

BECK’S Advanced Soybeans in No-Till (MP Soil)and Conventional-Till (HP Soil) - 2012

Purpose: This study compares some of our advanced experimental varieties to some of our leading products in our current line-up. We evaluate yield as well as agronomic characteristics by replicating this test on medium productivity, no-till soil and on high productivity, conventional-till soil.

Summary: This year’s advanced soybean variety study gave very surprising results. We saw the MP soil (no-till) out-yield the HP soil (conventional-till) by an amazing 10 Bu./A. Out of the 20 total soybean varieties, only two of them had higher yields in the HP conventional soil. This is the fourth year in a row that the MP no-till soil has averaged higher than the HP conventional type. The soybeans in the conventional ground were much taller than the no-till, which led to higher lodging counts. Even though our no-till plots have had slightly better yields this year, we were expecting the HP conventional soil to be a little more competitive.

87

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Advanced Soybeans in No-Till (MP Soil)and Conventional-Till (HP Soil) - Continued

88


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Management Study - 2012

Purpose: In an effort to reach our 100 Bu./A. yield goal, we developed two different methods; a high input trial where we applied various treatments on a planned regimented schedule, and a scouting trial where we spent more time scouting to determine the inputs we needed to apply and when to apply them. The goal is to evaluate the yield results of different management styles: managing with higher inputs and less scouting, or more scouting and perhaps fewer inputs.

Location: D1 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 7, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 166,196 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX®, Rows: Eleven 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act & 12 oz. Section

Brand Base TreatmentBushels†

Per AcreAdvantage for

Treatment Bu./A.†

HIGH INPUT TRIALBECK 335NR™* Escalate (Control) 66.5

BECK 335NR™* Escalate + Protinus + 2x Optimize + Quickroots™ + High Input Treatment 71.6 +5.1

BECK 375NR™* Escalate (Control) 66.6

BECK 375NR™* Escalate + Protinus + 2x Optimize + Quickroots™ + High Input Treatment 75.8 +9.2

AVERAGE 7.2

High Input Pre-planned TreatmentsMay 15th – 20 gal./A. water & 32 oz./A. Roundup PowerMAX® June 6th – 20 gal./A. water, 3.8 oz./A. Leverage®, 6 oz./A. Headline® & 1 pt./A. AgraMix II (micronutrients)June 7th – 20 gal./A. water, 32 oz./A. Roundup PowerMAX® & 12 oz./A. Section®

June 14th – 20 gal./A. water, 8 oz./A. Cobra® & 1 pt./A. Class ActJuly 3rd – 20 gal./A. water, 1 qt./A. Lorsban® 4E, 2 gal./A. 7-7-7 & 1 pt./A. AgraMix II (micronutrients)July 17th – 20 gal./A. water, 6 oz./A. Headline®, 1.5 pt./A. Dimethoate, 2 gal./A. 7-7-7, 8 oz./A. 10% boron & 2 qts./A. 10% managaneseAugust 1st – 20 gal./A. water, 1 gal./A. Nitamin® 30L, 1 gal./A. 7-7-7, 1 pt./A. AgraMix II & 1 qt./A. 10% managaneseAugust 8th – 20 ga./A. water, 2 gal./A. Nitamin® 30L, 1 pt./A. AgraMix II, 1 pt./A. Dimethoate, 2 oz./A. Mustang Max® & 6 oz./A. Headline®

SCOUTING TRIALBECK 335NR™* Escalate (Control) 71.6BECK 335NR™* Escalate + Optimize + Scouting Treatment 66.9 -4.7

BECK 375NR™* Escalate (Control) 78.1BECK 375NR™* Escalate + Optimize + Scouting Treatment 78.3 +0.2

AVERAGE -2.3

Treatments based on ScoutingMay 15th – 20 gal./A. water & 32 oz./A. Roundup PowerMAX®

June 6th – 20 gal./A. water, 32 oz./A. Roundup PowerMAX® & 12 oz./A. Section®

July 17th – 20 gal./A. water, 6 oz./A. Headline® & 1.5 pt./A. Dimethoate

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Quickroots is a trademark of TJ Technologies Inc. Leverage is a registered trademark of Bayer CropScience. Mustang Max is a registered trademark of FMC Corp. Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Section is a registered trademark of Valent USA Corporation. Class Act is a registered trademark of Winfield Solutions LLC. Lorsban is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC. Nitamin is a registered trademark of Georgia-Pacific. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: This year we tried many different products as well as many different applications in our attempt to break that 100 Bu./A. milestone. Even with the timely rainfall in early August, the hot and dry months of June and July restricted us from breaking 100 bushel. However, we saw a 9.2 Bu./A. increase with BECK’S 375NR™ in the treated high-input trial compared to the control. BECK 335NR™* responded to the high-input treatments as well, but not to the scouting trial treatments. Overall, this year’s results favored high input treatments by a margin of 9.5 Bu./A. Listed below are some of the product descriptions used in this year’s attempt.

Leverage™: Insecticide that has two modes of action against sucking and chewing pests – one delivers fast knockdown, the other extends residual control.

Protinus™: A seed treatment that promotes early plant health and growth by delivering zinc, manganese and iron right to the seed. This can lead to increased root mass, better vigor and early emergence. Protinus helps to lower the pH in the zone immediately around the seed thus allowing important nutrients to be more easily absorbed.

Quickroots™: QuickRoots is a foundational, microbial seed inoculant for increased yield. The yield response consistently generated by QuickRoots is not duplicated by other seed treatments. While QuickRoots performs independently, its synergistic live microorganisms with a dual mode of action often provides an additional yield boost when combined with other products.

Nitamin® 30L:

The water-soluble liquid is a blend of methylene urea, urea, and triazone that contains 30% nitrogen, of which 60% is slowly available. The remaining 40% is urea, which provides a readily-available nitrogen component.

Optimize®: A seed applied inoculant and LCO product to promote natural root and shoot development, improving plant health.

Section® 2EC: A post-emergent herbicide used for the control of a broad spectrum of actively growing annual and perennial grass weeds. It also provides excellent control of volunteer corn in soybeans.

Cheminova Dimethoate 4E:

Foliar applied insecticide that is effective in controlling many sucking, piercing and chewing insects, including aphids, psyllids, thrips, leaf miners, scales, leafhoppers, and spider mites.

Krystal Klear®

AgraMix II:Foliar micronutrient solution containing: 2% copper, 2% Manganese, 2% Zinc, .5% Boron.

Foli-Gro® Triple 7:

A unique blend of chelated micronutrients designed to promote plant growth and yields of a wide variety of agricultural and ornamental crops.

89

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Management Study - Continued

Leverage is a trademark of Bayer CropScience. Protinus is a trademark of Wolf Trax. Quickroots is a trademark of TJ Technologies Inc. Nitamin is a registered trademark of Georgia-Pacific. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop BioScience. Section is a registered trademark of Winfield Solutions, LLC. Krystal Klear is a registered trademark of Performance Nutrition™. Foli-Gro is a registered trademark of Wilbur-Ellis Company.

90


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S 100 Bushel Attempt - 2012Location: E5 N & E8 N plots Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 11, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 129,264 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX®

Rows: Five 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act & 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged)

TreatmentEmerged

PopulationBushels†

Per AcreBu./A. Advantage

for TreatmentBECK 335NR™*

Escalate (Control) 115,434 60.5 ----100 Bu. Mix** 96,921 62.2 +1.7100 Bu. Mix** + 12 oz. Cobra® @V3 101,277 60.5 +0.0100 Bu. Mix** + 2 qt. AgraMix @ R1 107,811 58.5 -2.0100 Bu. Mix** + Rolling @V3 114,345 57.5 -3.0100 Bu. Mix** + 1 qt. AgraMix @V3 + VersaMax™ @ R1 113,256 57.3 -3.2

AVERAGE 108,174 59.4 -1.3

BECK 375NR

Escalate (Control) 118,701 62.4 ----100 Bu. Mix** 120,879 66.2 +3.8100 Bu. Mix** + 12 oz. Cobra @V3 88,209 64.6 +2.2100 Bu. Mix** + 2 qt. AgraMix @ R1 91,476 63.8 +1.4100 Bu. Mix** + Rolling @V3 96,921 65.4 +3.0100 Bu. Mix** + 1 qt. AgraMix @V3 + VersaMax @ R1 120,879 64.1 +1.7

AVERAGE 106,178 64.4 +2.4†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. **100 Bu. Mix = Escalate + Optimize + Bio ForgeST + VOTiVO + Foliar Fungicide + InsecticideEscalate is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop Bioscience. VOTiVO is a registered trademark of Bayer. Krystal Klear AgraMix is a registered trademark of LidoChem, Inc. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC. Cobra is a registered trademark of Valent U.S.A. Corp. VersaMax is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc.

Purpose: This is our fifth attempt at 100 bushel soybeans at the Central Indiana PFR Center. We tested BECK 335NR™* and BECK 375NR™* treated with Beck’s Escalate® yield enhancement system. Our 100 Bushel Mix consists of Escalate plus Optimize®, Bio ForgeST and VOTiVO®. All entries in this study except for the controls received an application of Headline® and Dimethoate at the R4 growth stage. All entries were planted at 129,264 seeds/A.

Summary: We were unable to hit the 100 bushel barrier again this year. Our highest yield came from BECK 375NR™* treated with our 100 bushel mixture. Overall, the BECK 375NR™* out-yielded BECK 335NR™* by an average 5 Bu./A. This year we wanted to test stressing our soybeans both chemically and physically. Cobra was used in this study at the V3 growth stage in the attempt to shorten internode growth and increase pod development. We have tried using Cobra for multiple years now and have been unsuccessful in receiving a large yield increase. Last year we physically damaged our soybeans by thrashing them with a roto-tiller. This year we rolled our soybeans at the V3 growth stage with a custom yard roller. This method helped us receive a 3 Bu./A. increase over the control with the BECK 375NR™*, but we lost 3 Bu./A. with the BECK 335NR™*. We also saw similar results with the use of different micronutrient packages such as AgraMix and VersaMax Soybeans. Overall, it was very tough to beat our base 100 bushel mix treatment in both soybean varieties.

91

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Low Population 100 Bushel Attempt - 2012Location: 300-2 S plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 9, 2012 Tillage: Moldboard / S-TineHarvested: October 11, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 15": 124,648 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX®, 30": 101,564 seeds/A. 1 qt. Class Act & Rows: Various 12 oz. Section 2EC

Brand

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet

Return^30" ROWSBECK 335NR™*

100 Bu. Mix** 46.0 4.0 2.5 12.4 68.6 $905.52100 Bu. Mix** + AgraMix*** 44.0 4.0 2.0 12.6 72.1 $933.79

AVERAGE 45.0 4.0 2.3 12.5 70.4 $919.66

BECK 398NR100 Bu. Mix** 48.0 3.0 3.0 12.2 65.2 $860.64100 Bu. Mix** + AgraMix*** 50.0 4.0 2.0 12.7 67.2 $869.11

AVERAGE 49.0 3.5 2.5 12.5 66.2 $864.88

30" Row Average 47.0 3.8 2.4 12.5 68.3

15" ROWSBECK 335NR™*

100 Bu. Mix** 42.0 4.0 2.0 12.3 70.3 $927.96100 Bu. Mix** + AgraMix*** 46.0 4.0 3.0 12.7 83.6 $1,085.59

AVERAGE 44.0 4.0 3.0 12.5 77.0 $1,006.78

BECK 398NR100 Bu. Mix** 48.0 4.0 3.0 12.4 72.5 $957.00100 Bu. Mix** + AgraMix*** 54.0 4.0 4.0 12.2 66.7 $862.51

AVERAGE 51.0 4.0 3.5 12.3 69.6 $909.76

15" Row Average 47.5 4.0 3.3 12.4 73.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. **100 Bu. Mix = Escalate + Optimize + Bio-Forge®ST + VOTiVO + Foliar Fungicide + Insecticide.***AgraMix = 1 qt. AgraMix @ V3-V4 + 2 qt. AgraMix @ R1-R2.^Net return is based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, $15.90/gal. AgraMix and $6.00/application cost. (V3-V4 AgraMix was applied with herbicide, no application cost.)Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop Bioscience. VOTiVO is a registered trademark of Bayer. Krystal Klear AgraMix is a registered trademark of LidoChem, Inc. Bio-Forge is a registered trademark of Stoller, USA.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This is the first year for a low population 100 bushel attempt in 30" and 15" rows. We tested BECK 335NR™* and BECK 398NR treated with our 100 Bushel Mix. All entries in this study received an application of Headline and Dimethoate at the R4 growth stage. All 30" rows were planted at 101,564 seeds/A. and 15" rows at 124,648 seeds/A. in addition, we tested AgraMix, a chelated micronutrient package consisting of 2% Boron, Manganese, Zinc, and .5% Copper.

Summary: In this first year study our highest yield was 83.6 Bu./A. with BECK 335NR™* in 15" rows treated with our 100 bushel mix plus two applications of AgraMix. With the application of AgraMix, our average return on investment for the BECK 335NR™* was $92.95/A. When comparing the two soybean varieties, BECK 335NR™* out-yielded BECK 398NR by 5.8 Bu./A. When analyzing the two row spacings, the 15" rows averaged 5 Bu./A. more than the 30" rows. When comparing all three of our 100 bushel attempts at the Central Indiana PFR site, this study produced our highest single yield. Overall, this study was very successful for the type of growing season we encountered.

92


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Herbicide Systems - 2012Location: Atlanta Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 11, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 138,984 seeds/A. Roundup Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX &Rows: Eleven 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act Replications: Three (averaged) Liberty Post: 1 qt. Liberty & 1 qt. Class Act

TreatmentEmerged


Bushels†

Per Acre+/-

ControlBECK 375NR™*

Glyphosate f/b Glyphosate 118,096 13.2 75.0 +0.8Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate (Control) 123,904 13.0 74.2 ----Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R2 122,936 13.1 72.9 -1.3Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R3 121,968 13.2 73.8 -0.4Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R4 124,872 13.0 73.2 -1.0

AVERAGE 122,355 13.1 73.8 -0.9

BECK 372NLLiberty f/b Liberty 123,904 12.7 73.2 +1.9Pre-emg f/b Liberty (Control) 117,128 12.7 71.3 ----Pre-emg f/b Liberty @R2 116,160 12.9 72.7 +1.4Pre-emg f/b Liberty @R3 112,288 13.0 72.6 +1.3Pre-emg f/b Liberty @R4 125,840 13.2 72.4 +1.1

AVERAGE 119,064 12.9 72.4 +1.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Purpose: To evaluate the use of a pre-emergence herbicide followed by a post application of Glyphosate or Liberty. This study also tests the growth stage label restrictions on Glyphosate and Liberty herbicides. We planted BECK 375NR™* and BECK 372NL because they are both high yielding products and a 3.7 relative maturity.

Summary: In terms of yield, we didn’t receive a benefit with the use of a pre-emergent herbicide in the Glyphosate or LibertyLink soybeans. However, we were able to control the early weed pressure more effectively as shown below. At harvest, there were also fewer escapes in the sections where we applied a pre-emergence herbicide. As mentioned above we also tested the growth stage label restrictions on applying Glyphosate and Liberty. This year there were minimal differences between the application timings of Glyphosate and Liberty. However, when we made our R4 Glyphosate application it did “flash” the soybeans for a few days. More research needs to be done, with multiple varieties and application rates, in order to clarify that we aren’t causing further damage to the soybeans by making these late herbicide applications. As always, please read and follow the label.

93

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S Soybean Row Spacing & Population Study - 2012Location: Field K plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 22, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: Various Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® &Rows: Eleven 7.5" rows 1 qt. Class Act

Five 15" rowsFour 30” rows


Brand Target Population

7.5" Rows†

Bu./A.15" Rows†

Bu./A.30" Rows†

Bu./A.Average†

Bu./A.Net^

ReturnBECK 325NR™* 75,000 80.7 70.6 69.4 73.6 $947.04

100,000 80.0 75.8 70.4 75.4 $962.63125,000 78.1 75.8 72.9 75.6 $957.11150,000 75.2 80.6 71.1 75.6 $948.95175,000 74.7 81.9 72.4 76.3 $950.03200,000 74.7 72.7 65.4 70.8 $869.27

BECK 400NR™* 75,000 76.9 76.2 68.8 74.0 $952.32100,000 76.2 75.0 67.9 73.0 $930.95125,000 76.1 75.3 72.2 74.5 $942.59150,000 76.1 76.6 69.5 74.1 $929.15175,000 73.8 81.8 68.3 74.6 $927.59200,000 75.9 72.8 66.0 71.6 $879.83

OVERALL AVERAGE 76.5 76.2 69.5 74.1

Purpose: Soybean variety and row spacing can greatly affect their ability to branch and yield. Selecting the correct variety for your soil types and knowing how they respond to various populations and row spacing is critical for maximizing yields. This study compares two different varieties in three separate spacings, 7.5”, 15” and 30”. Finally, we put these in at six different seeding rates.

Summary: This year, yield differences between all row widths varied by 7 Bu./A. The 7.5” rows produced the highest yields for the second year in a row. However, our fourteen year average shows only a 0.9 Bu./A. difference between all row spacings, with slightly higher yields in 15” rows compared to 7.5” rows. Each row spacing has produced the highest yield in a given year. The only correlation we have found that relates to which row spacing does the best in a given year is heat. More specifically, the month that has the most days above 90 degrees has determined which row spacing produced the most in that year. When June had the highest number of days above 90 degrees, 7.5” rows produced the most, July, 15” rows, and August, 30” rows came to the top. However, this pattern hasn’t been the same for the past two growing seasons. This could be due to the fact that the last two seasons have been unlike any other year and both produced record setting 90+ degree days with less than average rainfall amounts.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.^Net return is based on yield multiplied by $13.20 minus the cost of 2011 seed with typical discounts. BECK 325NR™* and BECK 400NR™* 2011 seed cost = $42.44/130,000 seed unit.

FOURTEEN YEAR AvERAGE (BU./A.)7.5” 15” 30”

1998 63.6 62.8 64.01999 47.3 44.7 48.52001 66.7 64.3 59.52002 62.4 65.8 60.92003 54.4 53.5 54.32004 65.8 72.5 68.02005 61.9 63.2 65.42006 65.2 66.7 65.42007 51.9 58.0 56.12008 65.5 69.1 62.02009 62.5 57.5 61.62010 60.4 ---- 68.02011 77.3 67.2 69.12012 76.5 76.2 69.5

Average 63.0 63.2 62.3*Different varieties and populations used each year.

94


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Planting Date Study - 2012Location: E4 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: Various Tillage: No-TillHarvested: October 10 & 22, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Population: 133,294 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX &Rows: Four 30” rows 1 qt. Class Act (twice)

Planting Date Brand

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)

Standability1 = Erect5 = Flat

Bushels†

Per AcreMarch 29 BECK 335NR™* 32.0 2.0 3.0 69.6March 29 BECK 375NR™* 32.0 2.0 4.0 83.3

AVERAGE 32.0 2.0 3.5 76.5April 12 BECK 335NR™* 32.0 2.0 3.0 72.1April 12 BECK 375NR™* 34.0 2.0 3.5 87.2

AVERAGE 33.0 2.0 3.3 79.7April 25 BECK 335NR™* 34.0 3.0 2.5 74.7April 25 BECK 375NR™* 36.0 3.0 2.5 88.4

AVERAGE 35.0 3.0 2.5 81.6May 10 BECK 335NR™* 42.0 3.0 2.0 76.9May 10 BECK 375NR™* 44.0 4.0 2.5 84.3

AVERAGE 43.0 3.5 2.3 80.6May 24 BECK 335NR™* 36.0 3.0 2.5 66.8May 24 BECK 375NR™* 40.0 3.0 2.5 72.3

AVERAGE 38.0 3.0 2.5 69.6June 6 BECK 335NR™* 40.0 3.0 3.0 58.9June 6 BECK 375NR™* 38.0 3.0 2.0 65.6

AVERAGE 39.0 3.0 2.5 62.3

Purpose: Is it too early to plant soybeans? This question comes up every spring as temperatures begin to increase and the snow melts. So what is the correct answer? It is difficult to give an exact date, since spring weather conditions can vary greatly from year to year. This study has been conducted for several years and compares two Group III soybean varieties in six planting dates ranging from March 29 to June 6.


95

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Planting Date Study - ContinuedSummary: This year’s planting date results showed a 19.3 Bu./A. swing in yield amongst all six planting dates. Our first

planting date entry was actually March 15th, but due to severe frost damage we were forced to replant it on May 24th. In terms of yield, April 25th was our top planting date this year. Our long-term historical data (shown as a percent of yield in the graph below) reflects 15 years of research on planting dates. Escalate yield enhancement system makes it possible for farmers to plant during the highest yielding planting periods.

99%

107%104% 104%

102%98%

95%

87%91%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

105%

110%

Mar 21-Mar 31 April 2-6 April 9-14 April 15-28 May 1-12 May 14-27 May 29-June 2 June 4-17 June 18-30Perc

ent o

f Ave

rage

Yie

ld

Planting Dates

Soybean Planting Date 1998-2012

Frost damage 4-11-12.

Soybeans planted 3-15-12.

Toby Ripberger, PFR Coordinator.

96


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Foliar Fungicide / Insecticide Study - 2012Location: D2 & D3 plots Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 7, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 166,196 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® (twice),Rows: Eleven 15” rows 1 qt. Class Act (twice) & 12 oz. Section 2ECReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 362NR™*

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of insecticides and fungicides at two reproductive stages.

TreatmentBushels†

Per AcreGrossReturn

Foliar^Costs

Net^^ Return

Return onInvestment

APPLICATION STAGE R2Control 69.3 $914.76 ---- $914.76 ----6 oz. Headline® 70.9 $935.88 $25.45 $910.43 -$4.336 oz. Headline + 3.2 oz. Mustang Max 76.0 $1,003.20 $31.23 $971.97 +$57.213.2 oz. Mustang Max 70.0 $924.00 $11.78 $912.22 -$2.54

AVERAGE 71.6 $944.46 $22.82 $927.35 +$16.78

APPLICATION STAGE R4Control 70.1 $925.32 ---- $925.32 ----6 oz. Headline 69.0 $910.80 $25.45 $885.35 -$39.976 oz. Headline + 3.2 oz. Mustang Max 74.1 $978.12 $31.23 $946.89 +$21.573.2 oz. Mustang Max 67.5 $891.00 $11.78 $879.22 -$46.10

AVERAGE 70.2 $926.31 $22.82 $909.20 -$21.50†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Foliar cost is based on application cost $6.00/A., Headline $19.45/A., Mustang Max $5.78/A.^^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans minus foliar costs.Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Mustang Max is a trademark of FMC Corp. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: In 2010 and 2011, the R2 and R4 application stages showed a yield increase regardless of the application timing. This year we only saw a significant yield increase with an application of Headline + Mustang Max but we saw this increase at both application timings. This combination application provided an average of $39.39/A. return when compared to the control. With the dry weather conditions we had this year we are seeing a benefit from the plant health with a fungicide and the protection of yield with an insecticide.

97

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

BECK’S versaMax Soybean Study - 2012Location: L3 plot Previous Crop: SoybeansPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: V-Rip / S-TineHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 153,884 seeds/A. 1 qt. Class ActRows: Five 15” rowsReplications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageBECK 325NR™*

Glyphosate @ R1 (Control) 12.2 69.1 ---- $912.12 ----2 qt. VersaMax + Glyphosate @ R1 12.3 70.9 +1.8 $926.73 +$14.612 qt. VersaMax Mn + Glyphosate @ R1 12.2 73.7 +4.6 $966.69 +$54.57

AVERAGE 12.2 71.2 +3.2 $935.18 +$34.59

BECK 398NRGlyphosate @ R1 (Control) 12.5 72.5 ---- $957.00 ----2 qt. VersaMax + Glyphosate @ R1 12.3 76.4 +3.9 $999.33 +$42.332 qt. VersaMax Mn + Glyphosate @ R1 12.3 75.5 +3.0 $990.45 +$33.45

AVERAGE 12.3 74.8 +3.5 $982.26 +$37.89†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net Return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, cost of VersaMax $18.30/gal. and cost of VersaMax MN $12.29/gal. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This is a first year study evaluating applications of VersaMax Soybean and VersaMax Mn. VersaMax Soybean is a dynamic mixture of macro and micronutrients that can be applied as a foliar application or in row starter/side dress applications. VersaMax is intended to be used as a supplement to a standard fertility program. VersaMax improves plant health by providing efficient delivery of nitrogen (N) and other essential nutrients (S, Fe, Mn and Zn) as part of a total fertility program that will decrease plant stresses and increase potential for maximum genetic expression. VersaMax Mn provides the micronutrient manganese (Mn). Manganese is essential in plant growth affecting carbohydrate and nitrogen assimilation, chlorophyll production and crop maturity. VersaMax Mn is intended to be used as a supplement to a standard fertility program. In this study we will compare foliar treatments at 2 qts./A. applied at the R1 growth stage with 1 qt./A. Glyphosate tank mixed.

Summary: VersaMax Soybean and VersaMax Mn were able to give us positive yield results on both soybean varieties when compared to the controls. We saw an average return of $36.24/A. from the use of the two VersaMax products. Individually, VersaMax Mn performed the best with an average $44.01/A. return. Overall, we were very pleased with these two products and we look forward to more extensive testing in the future.

98


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S No-Till vs. Conventional-Till Long-Term Soybean Study - 2012

Location: E7 S & E8 S plots Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 24, 2012 Tillage: No-Till / Conv.-TillHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 153,884 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-D (No-Till Only)Rows: Five 15” rows Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX (twice),

1 qt. Class Act (twice) &12 oz. Section 2EC

Purpose: From 1991 - 1999, we studied how four different soybean varieties responded in emergence, plant height, pod height, disease resistance, standability, and yield using no-till and conventional-till practices. Since 2000, we expanded the study to include twice as many varieties and we now plant 15" rows with a White eleven row planter.

YieldRank Brand

Plant Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreYield +/-Conv.-Till

NO-TILL1 BECK 362NR™* 38.0 2.0 80.6 +15.42 BECK 325NR™* 38.0 2.0 79.7 +13.73 BECK 375NR™* 36.0 3.0 76.0 +15.84 BECK 432NR™* 34.0 2.0 75.2 +3.25 BECK 398NR 36.0 3.0 72.8 +7.26 BECK 400NR™* 38.0 3.0 70.0 +1.57 BECK 357NR™* 34.0 2.0 68.5 +4.68 BECK 294NR™* 32.0 1.5 67.9 +7.39 BECK 263NR™* 30.0 1.5 55.5 -0.9

10 BECK 241NR™* 26.0 3.0 55.2 +10.3AVERAGE 34.2 2.3 70.1 +7.8

CONvENTIONAL-TILL1 BECK 432NR™* 34.0 1.5 72.02 BECK 400NR™* 38.0 3.0 68.53 BECK 325NR™* 36.0 2.5 66.04 BECK 398NR 34.0 2.0 65.65 BECK 362NR™* 32.0 2.0 65.26 BECK 357NR™* 38.0 2.5 63.97 BECK 294NR™* 32.0 2.0 60.68 BECK 375NR™* 32.0 2.5 60.29 BECK 263NR™* 30.0 1.5 56.410 BECK 241NR™* 32.0 2.0 44.9

AVERAGE 33.8 2.1 62.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

99

Central Indiana PFR

Summary: No-till out-yielded conventional-till beans for the second year in a row this year by 7.8 Bu./A. By testing no-till vs. conventional-till practices in the same soil for 22 years, the overall average shows a 0.8 Bu./A. difference between the two practices with conventional-till winning twelve out of twenty-two years. Conv.-Till = 57.8 Bu./A. No-Till = 57.0 Bu./A. Over the years, we have observed a greater concentration of earthworms in the no-till areas, as well as improved water percolation into the soil after a heavy rain.

BECK’S No-Till vs. Conventional-Till Long-Term Soybean Study - Continued

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012N 46.0 50.5 59.9 61.9 47.8 41.2 59.0 56.7 42.9 56.5 61.6 58.2 50.1 54.3 51.6 62.1 56.6 63.0 60.0 63.9 79.9 70.1C 48.4 53.2 59.8 60.3 47.2 41.9 59.8 57.8 40.0 59.8 60.3 55.5 54.6 60.7 59.9 65.0 55.0 60.6 62.0 69.7 77.8 62.3

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

No-Till vs Conventional-Till Soybean Study Twenty-One Year Comparison

(1991-2012)

100


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Strip-Till vs. Conventional-TillSoybeans After Corn Study - 2012

Location: B2 plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: April 10, 2012 Tillage: Strip-Till / Conv.-TillHarvested: October 9, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 133,294 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Four 30” rows Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX (twice),

1 qt. Class Act (twice) & 12 oz. Section 2EC

Purpose: This study evaluates the practice of banding fertilizer in a strip-tillage system compared to broadcasting fertilizer in a conventional-tillage system. This is a long-term study where we compare both corn after soybean and corn after corn crop rotations.

SOYBEANS AFTER CORN

BrandLbs. of^Fertilizer

Rate of Fert.

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per AcreYield +/-Conv.-Till

STRIP-TILLBECK 432NR™* 285 lbs.

Base32.0 3.0 2.0 63.1

BECK 398NR 285 lbs. 34.0 3.0 2.0 56.1BECK 325NR™* 285 lbs. 32.0 3.0 2.0 55.7BECK 294NR™* 285 lbs. 30.0 3.0 2.0 42.4

AVERAGE 32.0 3.0 2.0 54.3 +1.6

BECK 432NR™* 188 lbs.66% ofBase

32.0 3.0 2.0 63.5BECK 325NR™* 188 lbs. 30.0 3.0 1.5 56.4BECK 398NR 188 lbs. 32.0 3.0 2.0 54.7BECK 294NR™* 188 lbs. 28.0 2.0 1.0 43.9

AVERAGE 30.5 2.8 1.6 54.6 +2.8

BECK 432NR™* 94 lbs.33% of Base

32.0 3.0 2.0 58.0BECK 398NR 94 lbs. 32.0 3.0 2.0 50.4BECK 325NR™* 94 lbs. 30.0 3.0 2.0 50.0BECK 294NR™* 94 lbs. 28.0 2.0 1.0 42.4

AVERAGE 30.5 2.8 1.8 50.2 -0.8

CONvENTIONAL-TILLBECK 325NR™* 285 lbs.

Base36.0 3.0 2.5 55.4

BECK 432NR™* 285 lbs. 32.0 3.0 2.0 53.5BECK 398NR 285 lbs. 38.0 3.0 2.5 51.9BECK 294NR™* 285 lbs. 32.0 3.0 2.0 50.0

AVERAGE 34.5 3.0 2.3 52.7

BECK 432NR™* 188 lbs.66% ofBase


AVERAGE 33.5 3.0 2.4 51.8BECK 432NR™* 94 lbs.

33% of Base


AVERAGE 28.5 2.8 2.6 51.0†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Fertilizer was last applied in fall of 2010 due to high test results in 2011. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: When implementing a strip-till system, it is important to have the proper equipment, as well as matching it to the proper soil types and environment. You can be much more accurate in a strip-till system with the use of auto-guidance technology. It can be very difficult to distinguish strip-till areas due to residue moving back into the strips, especially in a corn after corn rotation. In 2012 overall fertilizer sections, strip-till out-yielded conventional-till by 1.2 Bu./A. This data supports our multi-year data which shows an advantage from strip-till soybeans five out of the last six years.

101

Central Indiana PFR


Total 13.49 in.

Location: Field K S plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 8, 2012 Tillage: No-TillHarvested: October 17, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Population: 133,294 seeds/A. 8 oz. 2,4-DRows: Four 30" rows Pre: 10 oz. DomainReplications: Two (averaged) Post: 1 qt. Roundup PowerMAX (twice),

1 qt. Class Act (twice) & 12 oz. Section 2EC

BECK’S Gypsum Study - 2012

Gypsum Applications

Plant Height

(Inches)

Pod Height

(Inches)PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreCONTROL - NO APPLICATIONBECK 362NR™* 38.5 3.0 13.0 67.2BECK 432NR™* 40.0 3.0 13.4 64.7

AVERAGE 39.3 3.0 13.2 66.0

EvERY OTHER YEAR APPLICATION1,000 LBS. APPLIED IN 2011 & 900 LBS. IN 2010BECK 362NR™* 41.0 3.8 12.7 66.4BECK 432NR™* 38.0 3.0 13.3 63.0

AVERAGE 39.5 3.4 13.0 64.7

EvERY YEAR APPLICATION1,000 LBS. IN 2012, 1,500 LBS. APPLIED IN 2011, 900 LBS. IN 2010 & 2,000 LBS. APPLIED IN 2009BECK 362NR™* 38.5 3.0 12.7 63.6BECK 432NR™* 36.5 3.0 13.2 64.5

AVERAGE 37.5 3.0 13.0 64.1

EvERY THIRD YEAR APPLICATION2,000 LBS. APPLIED IN 2012 & 2,000 LBS. APPLIED IN 2009BECK 362NR™* 36.0 3.0 13.1 67.5BECK 432NR™* 35.5 3.0 13.8 63.9

AVERAGE 35.8 3.0 13.5 65.7

Purpose: To evaluate the application rates and soil amendment properties of Gypsum (Calcium Sulfate) in a no-till corn situation. We wanted to determine the residual benefits of a gypsum application. We did this by making an initial application of 2000 lbs. in 2009 and then comparing it to strips with consecutive applications for multiple years. The gypsum we applied this year is NutraSoft®, a granular product, for easier application.

Summary: In 2009, we used a spreader truck to apply product to the testing area. All corn hybrids tested in the 2009 study showed positive yield improvements from 3.8 to 37.6 Bu./A. and the average advantage where we applied gypsum was over 20 Bu./A. In 2010, both hybrids responded with a yield increase where we applied gypsum in the spring. We saw the maximum response to gypsum in the area that had gypsum spread both in 2009 and 2010. In this plot, we didn’t see a positive response to gypsum in 2011. The yield results that we have seen throughout this four year study shows a large response in the first year, which we attributed to the added sulfur. We didn’t see a yield response from the use of Gypsum this year when compared to the control. However, we did observe a 1.6 Bu./A. advantage where gypsum has been applied every three years compared to the yearly application.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.NutraSoft is a registered trademark of The Andersons, Inc. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

102


Total 13.49 in.

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Lime Study on Soybeans - 2012Location: 300-6 (S) plot Previous Crop: CornPlanted: May 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / V-Rip / S-Tine (twice)Harvested: October 17, 2012 Herbicide: Pre: 10 oz. DomainPopulation: 133,636 seeds/A. Post: 1 qt. Liberty & 1 qt. Class ActRows: Four 30” rows

Purpose: This is the nineteenth year of a long-term study to determine the effects of High Calcium Lime on corn and soybean production. We applied 0, 5, and 10 ton/A. of High Calcium Lime in April 1993 prior to planting corn. In the spring of 1994, we applied 0, 3, and 5 ton/A. of High Calcium lime to an additional area and planted soybeans. We have rotated the crops over the years, as well as applied additional lime in the spring of 2000. In an additional area where lime had not been applied, we applied 1.5 ton/A. each of Bed Ash (Calcium Sulfate) as well as High Calcium Lime. In 2010 we reapplied all of the initial rates except the 10 ton/A. lime section.

YieldRank Treatment

PlantHeight

(Inches)

PodHeight

(Inches)


Bushels†

Per Acre5 TONS/A.

1 BECK 313NL 38.0 3.0 2.0 50.12 BECK 372NL 46.0 3.0 2.0 48.83 BECK 386NL 42.0 3.0 1.0 40.44 BECK 306NL 40.0 3.0 2.0 25.7

AVERAGE 41.5 3.0 1.8 41.3

0 TON/A. + 3 TONS/A.1 BECK 372NL 40.0 4.0 2.0 60.62 BECK 313NL 34.0 3.0 1.0 57.83 BECK 386NL 36.0 3.0 1.0 46.14 BECK 306NL 36.0 3.0 1.0 37.0

AVERAGE 36.5 3.3 1.3 50.4

NO ADDED LIME1 BECK 313NL 38.0 4.0 1.0 69.42 BECK 372NL 46.0 4.0 3.0 67.53 BECK 306NL 42.0 3.0 2.0 58.74 BECK 386NL 44.0 3.0 2.0 50.9

AVERAGE 42.5 3.5 2.0 61.6

3 TONS/A. 1 BECK 313NL 42.0 3.0 1.0 60.32 BECK 372NL 48.0 3.0 3.0 56.73 BECK 386NL 46.0 3.0 1.0 47.74 BECK 306NL 42.0 4.0 2.0 43.0

AVERAGE 44.5 3.3 1.8 51.9

5 TONS/A.1 BECK 313NL 42.0 3.0 1.0 60.42 BECK 372NL 44.0 3.0 2.0 54.93 BECK 386NL 40.0 3.0 1.0 45.64 BECK 306NL 40.0 3.0 1.0 30.0

AVERAGE 41.5 3.0 1.3 47.7†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.

Summary: In the first eight years of this study, we saw a yield advantage of 22 Bu./A. in corn and 5 Bu./A. in soybeans from the addition of lime. Since 2006, yield differences between limed and non-limed areas have been minimal. In 2010, the non-limed area produced the highest yield. In the fall of 2010, we applied another application of lime to see if we can once again produce a yield increase following applications of High Calcium Lime. This year, our results once again showed that the non-limed area produced the highest yield at 61.6 Bu./A. We saw our lowest yields in the two 5 ton/A. areas. BECK 313NL performed well this year with the highest plot average of 59.6 Bu./A. BECK 306NL & BECK 386NL were not able to reach their potential because they were hit with Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) throughout the plot.

103

Central Indiana PFR

BECK’S Soybean Lime Study - Continued

Southern Indiana PFR

104


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Corn After Soybeans Show Plot - 2012Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 7, 2012 Tillage: Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 30,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Rows: Three 30” rows 0.75 oz. Impact

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. **Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Designates soil type change in field that affected yield potential.

YieldRank Brand

Emerged Population

Test†


Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK 5442VT3 30,167 58.3 22.8 192.22 BECK 5509A3 29,667 59.4 21.7 183.43 Phoenix 5642A4** 29,667 56.9 24.3 167.04 Phoenix 5552E** 29,333 58.0 23.9 164.95 Phoenix 5385A3** 29,667 59.6 21.0 162.76 Phoenix 5726A4** 29,167 55.2 24.6 161.27 BECK 5475AMX™* 25,167 59.9 21.1 159.48 Phoenix 5832A3** 28,333 59.5 21.7 158.29 BECK 6272HR™* 29,667 60.1 22.2 151.9

10 BECK 6175AMX™* 27,500 60.6 23.1 150.111 BECK 6077AM™* 30,000 59.9 21.3 143.712 Phoenix 6442A4** 29,500 57.2 23.7 142.313 BECK 5888Bt1 28,667 56.8 23.0 138.314 BECK 6188Bt1 29,667 59.1 23.5 138.115 BECK 6626AMX™*^ 28,333 58.6 24.1 137.116 Phoenix 6948A3**^ 30,000 57.1 25.2 132.917 BECK 7988BR^ 28,833 57.9 24.4 130.618 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™*^ 29,500 60.0 22.8 126.619 BECK 8603HR™*^ 29,500 58.5 23.2 110.220 BECK 6733HXR™*^ 28,167 59.0 23.6 108.1

AVERAGE 29,025 58.6 23.1 148.0


105


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Corn After Corn Show Plot - 2012Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 7, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Rows: Six 30” rows 0.75 oz. Impact

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. **Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

YieldRank Brand

Emerged Population

Test†


Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK 5442VT3 32,833 58.4 22.3 232.22 BECK 5509A3 33,667 59.5 20.7 220.83 Phoenix 5642A4** 32,167 57.8 23.5 215.14 Phoenix 5832A3** 30,833 56.0 23.7 214.15 BECK 6272HR™* 32,833 60.7 21.1 213.76 Phoenix 6442A4** 33,500 56.3 23.4 213.37 Phoenix 5552E** 32,500 58.2 22.2 212.48 BECK 7988BR 33,333 59.1 24.0 205.19 Phoenix 6948A3** 32,333 58.4 24.7 204.4

10 Phoenix 5726A4** 32,833 56.6 25.2 204.211 BECK 6175AMX™* 31,167 58.4 21.3 203.912 BECK 6733HXR™* 30,333 61.0 22.7 199.913 BECK 8603HR™* 32,833 60.1 22.1 199.714 Phoenix 5385A3** 33,500 60.0 18.5 198.415 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 32,333 61.3 20.7 195.216 BECK 5475AMX™* 31,500 59.7 19.9 194.617 BECK 6077AM™* 32,833 59.1 19.3 193.018 BECK 6626AMX™* 32,500 57.8 23.3 186.8

AVERAGE 32,435 58.8 22.1 205.9


106


Total 12.14 in.

Purpose: For this year’s attempt to break 300 bushel corn, we looked at a combination of systems that utilized biologicals to break down residue for nutrient release, increased nitrogen, utilized a high seeding rate, and used a two pass foliar fungicide and insecticide program to obtain our goal. Each entry received a total of 260 units of nitrogen. Nitrogen applications were split applied with 37.5 units applied as a 2x2 starter treatment at planting, 35.2 units preplant incorporated and the balance sidedressed at V4 to minimize nitrogen loss. The 2x2 starter treatment also contained two gallons of 10-34-0, 1.5 gallons of Thio-Sul® and two quarts of zinc. This year’s entries were planted at approximately 40,000 seeds per acre, received 4 oz. of Priaxor® fungicide and 1.28 oz. of Warrior II® at V7, and an application of 10 oz. of Headline AMP® with 1.28 oz. of Warrior II® at R1.

BECK’S 300 Bushel Attempt - 2012Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 12, 2012 Tillage: Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 40,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Rows: Six 30" rows 32 oz. Glyphosate

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on gross return minus the cost of 100 units ordered by Sept. 15, 2011 and paid by Jan. 10, 2012 minus the cost of nitrogen, fungicide and

insecticide. Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. RES 16 $76.00/gal. Headline $415.00/gal. Headline AMP $282.00/gal. Warrior II $460.00/gal. 32% nitrogen $448.00/ton. Thio-Sul $2.83/gal. Zinc $8.32/qt.

Thio-Sul is a registered trademark of Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Warrior II with Zeon is a trademark of Syngenta Group Company.

Summary: Considering the drought conditions that we experienced this season, this year's 300 Bushel results are better than expected. Phoenix 6442A4** topped this year’s high yield attempt at 227 Bu./A. Dry soil conditions early in the season allowed for deep root penetration that helped this year’s crop hold on despite record low rainfall this summer. Applying an additional 35 units of nitrogen at planting, compared to our standard rate in other corn studies, also led to higher yields this year by allowing more nitrogen to convert into forms that could be utilized by the plant prior to our soil drying out. This is also evident in our Nitrogen Timing Study results this year. Although disease pressure was relatively low, the maintained plant health was visually evident. This also provided an opportunity to take advantage of the rains we received in early August to help with grain fill.

YieldRank Brand

Final Stand

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

ReturnREP. 1

1 Phoenix 6442A4** 39,167 57.6 21.6 201.0 $817.26 2 Phoenix 6948A3** 37,500 57.5 22.8 192.5 $769.44 3 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 37,833 61.2 20.6 185.3 $736.25 4 BECK 6175AMX™* 36,833 60.9 21.0 184.4 $714.99 5 BECK 5509A3 37,500 62.3 18.9 178.6 $687.20 6 BECK 6733HXR™* 37,333 61.6 21.4 175.1 $669.28

AVERAGE 37,694 60.2 21.1 186.2 $732.40

REP. 21 Phoenix 6442A4** 38,000 57.3 22.0 227.0 $970.54 2 BECK 6175AMX™* 37,500 61.5 20.9 213.0 $883.99 3 BECK 5509A3 38,333 61.9 19.7 207.6 $858.42 4 BECK 6733HXR™* 35,333 60.8 21.0 197.8 $802.93 5 Phoenix 6948A3** 37,000 57.4 22.3 195.2 $785.62 6 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 38,667 61.4 20.9 195.2 $794.29

AVERAGE 37,472 60.0 21.1 206.0 $849.30

REP. 31 Phoenix 6442A4** 38,000 57.0 22.9 221.4 $937.43 2 BECK 6175AMX™* 37,667 62.0 20.8 218.7 $917.37 3 Phoenix 6948A3** 38,667 58.4 22.4 197.2 $797.24

AVERAGE 38,111 59.1 22.0 212.4 $884.01


107


Total 12.14 in.

Summary: The warm temperatures and dry conditions that accompanied the spring of 2012 led to above average growth for this year’s cover crops. This allowed the entries containing annual ryegrass to produce deep roots for breaking compaction, while the entries containing crimson clover had ample opportunity to produce more nitrogen for the following corn crop. A glyphosate burndown was sprayed on March 13th resulting in a good kill on the annual ryegrass; however, the Crimson Clover continued to grow. The Clover was later killed with an application of dicamba closer to the time of planting. The GroundHog™ Brand Radishes provided both the highest yields and net return in this year’s study followed by Beck’s Corn Champion Mix. Both entries containing annual ryegrass showed significantly lower yields than the remaining entries. We will continue to evaluate this in future studies.

BECK’S Cover Crop Study - 2012Planted: April 19, 2012 Tillage: VariousHarvested: September 7, 2012 Herbicide: Burndown: 64 oz. Glyphosate & Population: 34,000 seeds/A. 16 oz. Sterling BlueRows: Six 30” rows Post: 3 oz. Capreno & 1 qt. AtrazineReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK EX 0219 Previous Crop: Soybean (6543 Genetics)™*

Treatment

SeedingRate

Lbs./ASeed

Cost/A.PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

ReturnGroundHog™ Brand Radish 5.0 $13.00 20.8 162.6 $946.34Beck’s Corn Champion Mix 15.5 $27.90 22.0 159.7 $914.33Crimson Clover 15.0 $21.00 22.2 156.6 $902.94Beck’s Bean Builder Mix 18.0 $22.20 22.1 120.2 $686.98N-Vest™ Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass Blend 15.0 $12.00 20.5 117.2 $679.48

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based $5.90/Bu. corn minus the cost of cover crop seed.GroundHog is a trademark of AMPAC Seed Company. N-Vest is a trademark of CISCO Companies.

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate various cover crop products for use in a corn following soybean rotation. For this year’s study, soybeans were harvested in late September (2011) with the cover crop being no-tilled with a drill within a couple of days of harvest. The cover crops that did not winter kill were burned down in mid to late March. Corn was then no-tilled into the remaining cover crop residue. The following products were used as cover crops in this study.

GroundHog™ Brand Radish: This radish produces large root masses that can shatter compaction and scavenge nitrogen and nutrients deep within the soil. Radishes can capture up to 150 - 200 lbs. of nitrogen before winter killing.

Beck’s Corn Champion Mix: A combination of Crimson Clover, GroundHog™ Brand Radish and Appin Turnips. This mix has the ability to produce, store, and release large amounts of nitrogen while also breaking up layers of compaction.

Crimson Clover: An aggressive clover that overwinters well and has the ability to produce large amounts of nitrogen.

Beck’s Bean Builder Mix: A combination of Annual Ryegrass, GroundHog™ Brand Radish and Appin Turnips. This mix is a great combination of fibrous roots and tubers, which allows the Bean Builder Mix to break up layers of compaction.

N-vest™ Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass Blend: A combination of two deep rooted annual ryegrass varieties with exceptional winter hardiness.


108


Total 12.14 in.


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceGross^Return

Cost of Treatment

Return on^^ Investment

BECK 6179vT3 - High SusceptibilityControl 20.4 198.1 ---- $1,168.79 $0.00 ----6 oz. Quadris® @ V5 20.3 201.6 +3.5 $1,189.44 $19.88 +$0.776 oz. Quadris + 10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel® @ R1 20.3 198.7 +0.6 $1,172.33 $47.95 -$44.4110.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ R1 20.0 198.0 -0.1 $1,168.20 $28.07 -$28.66

AVERAGE 20.2 199.1 +1.3BECK 6175AMX™* - Low SusceptibilityControl 20.5 189.5 ---- $1,118.05 $0.00 ----6 oz. Quadris @ V5 20.4 192.9 +3.4 $1,138.11 $19.88 +$0.186 oz. Quadris + 10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ VT 20.5 196.1 +6.6 $1,156.99 $47.95 -$9.0110.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ VT 20.7 180.6 -8.9 $1,065.54 $28.07 -$80.58

AVERAGE 20.5 189.8 +0.4BECK 6626AMX™* - Medium SusceptibilityControl 22.6 181.3 ---- $1,069.67 $0.00 ----6 oz. Quadris @ V5 22.6 179.2 -2.1 $1,057.28 $19.88 -$32.276 oz. Quadris + 10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ VT 22.9 182.9 +1.6 $1,079.11 $47.95 -$38.5110.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ VT 22.4 177.7 -3.6 $1,048.43 $28.07 -$49.31

AVERAGE 22.6 180.3 -1.4

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Timing Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. ^^Return on investment is based on gross return minus the cost of fungicide and application. Quadris $424.09/gal. Quilt Xcel $269.09/gal. $6.00/A. application fee.Quadris and Quilt Xcel are registered trademarks of Syngenta Group Company.

Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Rows: Four 30” rows Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,Population: 34,000 seeds/A. 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. GlyphosateReplications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of foliar fungicides on corn at various timings. Three treatments were compared to an untreated control: a single application of 10.5 oz. of Quilt Xcel™ applied at the R1 growth stage, a single application of 6 oz. of Quadris® applied at V5, and a two pass program of 6 oz. of Quadris® sprayed at V5 followed by 10.5 oz. of Quilt Xcel™ at R1. Three hybrids representing the three levels of hybrids response (high, medium, and low) were used to evaluate if the optimum timing of application is affected by hybrid susceptibility. In addition to evaluating the effectiveness of this product in the presence of various foliar diseases, this study has been planted into a 12 year continuous corn rotation to evaluate the products effectiveness on Diplodia Ear Rot.

Treatment SummaryPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Cost of Treatment

Return on^^ Investment

Control 21.1 189.7 ---- $1,119.23 $0.00 ----6 oz. Quadris @ V5 21.1 191.2 +1.5 $1,128.08 $19.88 -$11.036 oz. Quadris + 10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ R1 21.2 192.6 +2.9 $1,136.34 $47.95 -$30.8410.5 oz. Quilt Xcel @ R1 21.0 185.4 -4.3 $1,093.86 $28.07 -$53.44

AVERAGE 21.1 189.7 0.0

Summary: This year's growing season began with above average temperatures and unusually dry soil conditions resulting in lower than normal disease pressure. Therefore, minimal yield response was seen with the use of foliar fungicides. The single application of Quadris® at V5 resulted in a 3.5 and 3.4 Bu./A. yield gain for BECK 6179VT3 and BECK 6175AMX™* respectively. However, profits were only slightly above breakeven. BECK 6175AMX™* also showed a 6.6 Bu./A. increase in yield from the two pass program of 6 oz. of Quadris at V5 followed by 10.5 oz. of Quilt Xcel at R1, but this was not enough yield increase to produce a profit. Although the 2012 results did not correlate to hybrid susceptibility, previous year's data suggests that the likelihood of making a profitable foliar fungicide application of corn should be based more on the susceptibility of the hybrids than the timing of the fungicide application (See graph with three year data below). Hot, dry conditions during flowering resulted in very low Diplodia pressure in 2012.


109

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Timing Study - Continued

7.5

9.2

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5

10.0

Bu.

/A. D

iffer

ence

Highly Susceptible Hybrid Response to Fungicide 3 Year Data

10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel R1

6 oz. Quadris + 10.5 oz. Quilt Xcel R1

Jason Webster discusses fungicide applications at the Southern Illinois PFR field show.


110


Total 12.14 in.

Purpose: In recent years there has been a growing interest in controlling foliar diseases that can severely limit corn yields. This study was established to evaluate the benefits of applying foliar fungicides on the majority of the genetic families that Beck’s offers in the southern marketing area. Applications were made at full tassel with a Hagie high-clearance sprayer using 15 gallons of water per acre. Diseases commonly seen at the Southern Indiana PFR farm include Gray Leaf Spot, Southern Leaf Blight and Northern Corn Leaf Blight along with occasional occurrences of Southern and Common Rust, Anthracnose and Diplodia ear rot. The crop rotation for this study was 12 year continuous corn.

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Study - 2012Planted: April 20, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,Rows: Four 30" rows 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. Glyphosate

Application & BrandTest†


Bushels†

Per Acre

Yield Advantage

vs. UntreatedReturn on^Investment

HEADLINE AMP®

BECK 5442VT3 58.0 21.4 188.6 +14.2 +$52.11BECK 5509A3 60.2 19.7 178.9 -0.5 -$30.17Phoenix 5642A4** 58.2 22.4 187.6 +5.1 -$0.18BECK 6077AM™* 60.2 20.1 168.0 -1.5 -$40.64Phoenix 5832A3** 60.1 21.0 188.0 +5.3 +$2.70Phoenix 5726A4** 55.0 23.7 189.5 -1.3 -$39.83BECK 6111HXR™* 62.6 20.9 191.0 +5.1 +$0.11BECK 6272HR™* 62.0 20.9 206.4 -5.8 -$65.97BECK 6288A3 60.4 21.5 183.1 +0.8 -$27.89Phoenix 6442A4** 55.9 22.3 211.6 +4.2 -$4.48BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 61.5 20.2 194.4 +4.4 +$0.81BECK 6733HXR™* 61.1 20.8 193.2 -5.9 -$62.27Phoenix 6948A3** 57.3 23.3 202.4 +3.5 -$8.54BECK 7988BR 60.6 21.4 211.3 +13.1 +$60.18BECK 8603HR™* 59.1 21.8 149.4 +0.5 -$25.81

AVERAGE 189.6 +2.7 -$12.66QUILT XCELBECK 6175AMX™* 61.6 20.7 180.6 -8.9 -$80.55BECK 6626AMX™* 61.0 22.4 177.7 -3.6 -$46.91BECK 6179VT3 59.5 20.0 198.0 -0.1 -$25.87

AVERAGE 185.4 -4.2 -$51.11UNTREATEDBECK 5442VT3 57.9 21.4 174.4BECK 5509A3 60.2 19.8 179.4Phoenix 5642A4** 58.1 22.3 182.5BECK 6077AM™* 60.9 19.5 169.5Phoenix 5832A3** 60.2 21.1 182.7Phoenix 5726A4** 54.8 23.1 190.8BECK 6111HXR™* 61.9 20.8 185.9BECK 6272HR™* 61.8 20.3 212.2BECK 6288A3 60.3 20.9 182.3Phoenix 6442A4** 56.2 22.3 207.4BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 61.6 20.7 190.0BECK 6733HXR™* 61.7 20.7 199.1Phoenix 6948A3** 57.5 23.3 198.9BECK 7988BR 58.3 23.2 198.2BECK 8603HR™* 58.8 21.7 148.9BECK 6175AMX™* 61.9 20.5 189.5BECK 6626AMX™* 61.5 22.6 181.3BECK 6179VT3 59.2 20.4 198.1

AVERAGE 187.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Return on investment based on gross income minus drying charges and the cost of fungicide and application. Headline AMP $22.03/A. Quilt Xcel $22.07/A. Application Charge $6.00/A. Drying cost $0.04/point on moisture above 15%. Corn price $5.90/Bu. Headline AMP is a registered trademark of BASF.

Summary: The drought that we experienced this summer resulted in unfavorable conditions for disease in 2012, thus limiting both the incidence and severity of disease. As the dry trend changed to rain showers in August, moderate Gray Leaf Spot and Northern Corn Leaf Blight pressure could be found just prior to harvest, but it had little effect on yield. It should be noted that susceptible hybrids such as BECK 5442VT3 continue to show profitable returns even in a low disease pressure year. This proves the importance of basing the decision to spray for foliar disease on the disease susceptibility of each hybrid and the likelihood of disease infestation based on environmental conditions.


111

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Study - Continued


Test†


Bushels†

Per AcrePhoenix 5832A3** 32,167 61.5 19.9 145.4BECK 5475AMX™* 29,167 61.1 19.4 136.9BECK 6077AM™* 33,000 61.4 20.2 133.2

AVERAGE 31,445 61.3 19.8 138.5

BECK’S Corn Drought Tolerance Demo - 2012


Planted: April 19, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 7, 2012 Tillage: Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Rows: Three 30” rows 0.75 oz. Impact

Purpose: There has been a lot of talk throughout the seed industry about the development of drought tolerant corn. This demonstration plot was designed to give Beck’s customers a look at the first drought tolerant technologies that will be available through Beck’s Hybrids.

Summary: Beck’s Hybrids is in the unique position of being able to offer its customers two different drought tolerant technologies. This demo showcased both Agrisure Artesian from Syngenta (Phoenix 5832A3**) and Optimum Aquamax (BECK 5475AMX™*) from DuPont Pioneer. Both of the hybrids with drought tolerant technologies out-yielded BECK 6077AM™*. We will continue to evaluate this technology as it becomes available in more hybrid offerings in the future.


Total 12.14 in.


112


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Optimum Nitrogen Rate Study - 2012Continuous Corn and Corn After Soybeans

Planted: April 2, 2012 Previous Crop: Corn / SoybeansHarvested: August 28 & 30, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine, Rows: Six 30" rows 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. GlyphosateReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 6175AMX™*


Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

ReturnCONTINUOUS CORN0 18.1 98.9 $583.51125 18.4 196.0 $1,068.90150 18.7 203.0 $1,092.70175 19.4 216.8 $1,156.62200 19.5 224.2 $1,182.78225 20.1 230.6 $1,203.04250 19.6 236.9 $1,222.71CORN AFTER SOYBEANS0 17.2 99.0 $584.10100 19.8 180.8 $996.72125 20.3 206.4 $1,130.26150 20.6 211.4 $1,142.26175 21.1 219.2 $1,170.78200 21.2 218.0 $1,146.20225 21.3 214.2 $1,106.28

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on gross income minus the cost of nitrogen. Corn price of $5.90/Bu. 32% UAN solution cost of $448.00/ton.

Purpose: This study is designed to help us find the economic optimum nitrogen rate (EONR); that is the rate of nitrogen that maximizes profitability. Although the study was originally based on the format used by both Purdue University and the University of Illinois, we have added a wider range of rates and narrowed the difference between rates to better pinpoint the EONR. This study was conducted in both a corn after soybean and a continuous corn rotation. All entries, with the exception of the 0 lbs./A. control, received 10 gallons of 32% as a 2x2 application at planting followed by a sidedress application of 32% at the V3 growth stage to meet the total amount of nitrogen for each treatment.

Summary: Corn After Corn: The 2012 results show that the EONR for the corn after corn rotation was 250 lbs./A. Based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $0.70/lbs. nitrogen, the four year data trend from the Southern Indiana PFR farm suggests that the EONR ranges from 216 - 224 lbs./A. depending on the cost of nitrogen.

Corn After Soybeans: The EONR for the corn after soybean rotation for 2012 was 175 lbs./A. The four year data trend from the Southern Indiana PFR farm suggests that the EONR ranges from 178 - 183 lbs./A. depending on the cost of nitrogen.


113

BECK’S Optimum Nitrogen Rate Study - ContinuedContinuous Corn and Corn After Soybeans

FPO

FPO

$1,040.00

$1,060.00

$1,080.00

$1,100.00

$1,120.00

$1,140.00

$1,160.00

$1,180.00

175 185 195 205 215 225 235 245

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

4 Year CAC: Economic Optimum N Rate

$0.50/Lbs. N.

$0.60/Lbs. N.

$0.70/Lbs. N.

$1,140.00 $1,150.00 $1,160.00 $1,170.00 $1,180.00 $1,190.00 $1,200.00 $1,210.00 $1,220.00 $1,230.00

150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

4 Year CAB: Economic Optimum N Rate

$0.50/Lbs. N.

$0.60/Lbs. N.

$0.70/Lbs. N.


114


Total 12.14 in.

Purpose: Applying nitrogen preplant with anhydrous ammonia (NH3) is a common practice for many growers in the southern marketing area. This is driven by the fact that NH3 is often the least expensive form of N available, the risk of weather delaying sidedress applications is eliminated, and irregular fields often make sidedressing more difficult. But increased nitrogen prices have made us re-evaluate the way we fertilize our crops in recent years. In addition to studies that identify the optimum rate of nitrogen fertilizer, it is critical that we understand how the timing of these applications affect the efficiency of the nitrogen applied to a crop. This study was conducted to see if yields could be raised by applying nitrogen at different times. All treatments in this study received a total of 230 lbs./A. of nitrogen and are compared to the 100% preplant application of NH3.

BECK’S Corn Nitrogen Timing Study - 2012Planted: April 7, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 11, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,Rows: Six 30" rows 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. GlyphosateReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: Phoenix 6948A3**

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn minus the cost of nitrogen NH3 $877.00/ton, 32% UAN $448.00/ton, Super U $710.00/ton, ESN $695.00/ton,

N-Serve $54.08/gal.N-Serve is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences.

ApplicationHarvestedPopulation

Test†Weight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

Return

Adv. OverPreplant

NH3230 lbs. Preplant NH3 w/ N-Serve® 32,250 58.4 20.7 217.1 $1,144.32 $25.42230 lbs. Preplant NH3 33,583 58.5 21.2 210.5 $1,118.90 ----230 lbs. PPI UAN 33,667 58.4 20.7 180.3 $902.77 -$216.13115 lbs. Preplant Incorporated + 115 lbs. Sidedress UAN @ V4/5 33,000 58.4 21.1 195.1 $990.09 -$128.8110 gal. 32% UAN 2x2 + Sidedress UAN @ V3 33,417 58.7 21.5 204.8 $1,047.32 -$71.58

230 lbs. Sidedress UAN @ V3 33,417 58.5 21.0 210.2 $1,079.18 -$39.72230 lbs. Sidedress UAN @ V6 32,000 58.0 21.1 194.3 $985.37 -$133.5310 gal. 32% UAN 2x2 + Topdress Super U @ V7 33,083 58.8 20.9 177.1 $869.89 -$249.0135 lbs. 32% UAN 2x2 + Topdress ESN @ V7 32,333 58.9 20.9 147.3 $690.57 -$428.34

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00

$60.00

5 Year Nitrogen Timing Summary: Return Over 100% Pre-plant NH3

100% N Sidedress UAN V3

30 lbs. N 2x2 UAN + Sidedress UAN V3

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00

$60.00

3 Year Nitrogen Timing Summary: Return Over 100% Pre-plant NH3

100% N Sidedress UAN V3

30 lbs. N 2x2 UAN + Sidedress UAN V3

50%. N PPI UAN + 50% Sidedress UAN V4-5 100% N Sidedress UAN V6

Summary: This year’s study is the first in five years of testing where these 100% preplant applications of NH3 have proven to be most profitable. In fact, the earlier nitrogen was applied in 2012, the more profitable the results were (with the exception of the 100% application of UAN solution). This is due to drier than normal soil conditions at the time when sidedress applications were made followed by continued drought conditions throughout the summer. The later that nitrogen was applied, the worse the yield results were. This was evident by the poor results we saw from top-dressing Super U and ESN at the V7 growth stage. The use of N-Serve with preplant NH3 increased yield by 6.6 Bu./A. and profitability by $25.42/A. Long term data collected at the Southern Indiana PFR location over the past five years has shown an average profit of over $50.00/A. in favor of split applied applications of nitrogen. See the charts showing the three and five year summaries on the previous page.


115

BECK’S Corn Nitrogen Timing Study - Continued


116


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - 2012

Planted: April 17, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 12 & 13, 2012 Tillage: Disc / Disc Ripper / Population: 28,000 to 48,000 seeds/A. Field CultivatorRows: Three 20" rows Herbicide Pre: 3 oz. Capreno

Two 30" rows 1 qt. AtrazineSoil Type: Silty Clay Loam Post: 32 oz. Glyphosate &

0.75 oz. Impact

Purpose: This study compares thirteen hybrids in 20” and 30” row spacing at final populations ranging from 28,000 to 48,000 seeds/A. to evaluate population trends and row width configurations.



117

BECK’S 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - 2012

PopulationSummary:

Higher populations have definitely been showing an increase in yield in our Southern Indiana PFR studies the last several years. Last year saw slightly less returns for the highest populations when compared to 2009 and 2010 results. However the 44,000 final stand still outperformed the 24,000 and 28,000 final stands. This year we lost several plots in the 24,000 final stand section of the plot, therefore we are only able to publish the 28,000 final stands up to the 48,000 final stands. The graphs on the previous page and the top left corner of this page show the 13 individual hybrids and how they performed at various populations. This year at our Southern Indiana PFR location the yields continued to climb until they got to the 40,000 population and then they began to decline. Both the highest yields and the highest return minus seed costs came from the 40,000 population this year. We continued our trend of seeing higher returns all the way up to 44,000 than at our lower population of 28,000. Keep in mind that all of these populations are final stands as we overplant and thin to the desired population.


This year the 20” rows performed the best at our Southern Indiana PFR location. 20” rows averaged209.7 Bu./A. across all hybrids and all populations, while the 30” rows averaged 196.5 Bu./A. Bothrow width configurations closely emulated one another up to the 40,000 final population, howeverat the two highest populations, 20” rows really began to show their advantage. At the two highestpopulations the 20” rows exhibited a 28 Bu./A. advantage. This pattern of 20” rows being able tomaintain higher yields at the highest populations has been seen across our PFR locations overseveral years. Please visit with your seed advisor if you are trying to select the best products touse in 20” row configurations. There are several factors to take into account when selectingproducts for 20” row corn, in addition to the yield data represented at our various PFR locations.



118


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - 2012

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of a mid-season and a full-season hybrid planted on several dates throughout the growing season.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

PlantingDate Harvest Date Brand

EmergentPopulation

Test† Weight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreMarch 21 Aug. 20 BECK 5442VT3 33,333 57.3 20.5 178.1March 21 Aug. 20 Phoenix 6848A3** 32,500 55.4 22.1 163.0

AVERAGE 32,917 56.4 21.3 171.0

March 29 Aug. 20 BECK 5442VT3 32,167 56.9 23.5 176.4March 29 Aug. 20 Phoenix 6848A3** 32,167 55.5 26.3 168.0

AVERAGE 32,167 56.2 24.9 172.2

April 4 Aug. 27 BECK 5442VT3 33,167 57.7 22.9 164.4April 4 Aug. 27 Phoenix 6848A3** 32,833 55.1 25.6 158.9

AVERAGE 33,000 56.4 24.3 161.7


AVERAGE 32,500 58.4 23.6 158.7


AVERAGE 32,667 58.9 26.3 157.9

April 27 Sept. 11 BECK 5442VT3 33,167 58.7 20.6 175.1April 27 Sept. 11 Phoenix 6848A3** 32,167 58.2 21.8 183.1

AVERAGE 32,667 58.5 21.2 179.1

May 3 Sept. 11 BECK 5442VT3 32,667 59.9 21.1 180.2May 3 Sept. 11 Phoenix 6848A3** 31,500 58.1 23.2 189.8

AVERAGE 32,084 59.0 22.2 185.0


AVERAGE 33,667 59.4 21.3 215.1


AVERAGE 33,084 54.5 24.4 207.0

Planted: Various Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Rows: Six 30” rows 32 oz. Glyphosate

Summary: The eight year trend shows the optimum planting dates for corn at the Southern Indiana PFR location fall between the April 23rd and May 4th. However, this year's results show that corn planted on May 16th produced the highest yielding corn. This spring started with drier than normal conditions allowing for early planting and very good stand establishment. Unfortunately that was followed by continued dry weather with excessively high temperatures, particularly when April planted corn was pollinating. Signs of extreme drought stress such as silk delay and poor kernel set were evident in corn planted the second week of April through the end of April. The excessive heat seemed to break somewhat when corn planted in May was pollinating, thus high yields for corn with later than normal planting dates.


119

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - 2012

125

150

175

200

225

3/24 3/31 4/7 4/14 4/21 4/28 5/5 5/12 5/19 5/26 6/2 6/9

Bu.

/A.

Planting Date

8 Year Corn Yield by Planting Date


120


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Corn Replant Study - 2012Planted: Various Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Harvested: Various Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine &Population: Various 32 oz. GlyphosateRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 6848A3**

Previous Crop: Soybeans

Purpose: To replant or not to replant…that is the question. Often times, the decision to replant can be a tough one for growers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate corn stands and determine whether or not it is profitable to replant. This is done by evaluating the yield performance of corn planted at 20,000 seeds/A. with random spacing versus corn planted at 34,000 seeds/A. with consistent spacing across a wide range of planting dates.

Summary: This year's results show how important it is to obtain an optimum stand to achieve high yields. Replanting stands that resulted in 20,000 plants per acre with variable spacing proved to be profitable for every date that we planted corn in 2012. This is due to high yields for corn planted in mid to late May. Corn planted during that time provided a decrease in temperature during pollination and timely rains for grain fill in August and September. The four year summary from this study suggests that it is profitable to replant variable stands resulting from corn planted through May 18th. After that date, it was more profitable to keep the existing stand of approximately 20,000 plants per acre.

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return is based on gross income minus the cost of drying ($0.04/point on moisture above 15%) and a $25.00/A. estimated cost for replant.

Planting DatePlanted

PopulationTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreReplant

AdvantageNet^

ReturnAdditional

$/A.March 21 (Normal 1st planting) 34,000 55.4 22.1 163.0 $915.41 March 21 20,000 55.7 23.5 132.2 $735.03 April 4 (Replanted) 34,000 55.1 25.6 158.9 26.7 $845.14 $110.10 March 29 20,000 55.8 26.9 140.6 $762.61 April 11 (Replanted) 34,000 58.4 24.9 164.7 24.1 $881.51 $118.89 April 4 20,000 55.8 25.0 134.5 $739.75 April 19 (Replanted) 34,000 58.9 27.4 168.0 33.5 $882.87 $143.12 April 11 20,000 56.5 24.7 138.3 $762.31 April 27 (Replanted) 34,000 58.2 21.8 183.7 45.4 $1,008.86 $246.55 April 19 20,000 57.8 27.4 140.6 $759.80 May 3 (Replanted) 34,000 58.1 23.2 189.8 49.2 $1,032.57 $272.76 April 27 20,000 57.3 21.2 143.7 $812.19 May 16 (Replanted) 34,000 59.9 22.5 213.4 69.7 $1,170.04 $357.85 May 3 20,000 58.1 23.4 147.7 $821.80 May 16 (Replanted) 34,000 59.9 22.5 213.4 65.7 $1,170.04 $348.24 May 16 20,000 56.8 22.6 173.4 $970.35 May 25 (Replanted) 34,000 55.2 26.3 211.5 38.1 $1,127.25 $156.91

-$100.00

$0.00

$100.00

$200.00

$300.00

$400.00

3/31 4/7 4/14 4/21 4/28 5/5 5/12 5/19

Net

Ret

urn

Replan'ng Date

4 Year SINPFR Replant Return/A.


121


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Res 16™ Tillage Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.††Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on gross income minus $9.50/A. for RES 16 and $6.00/A. application cost.RES 16 is a trademark of Bioenzyme, LLC.

2012 SUMMARY

Treatment

Corn After Soybeans Continous Corn Soybeans After Corn

Conv.Till

NoTill

StripTill

Conv.Till

NoTill

StripTill

Conv.Till

NoTill

StripTill

RES 16™ 207.0 123.7 169.1 221.7 207.5 216.9 82.3 75.6 76.3Untreated 203.7 111.5 164.1 215.6 206.1 217.4 82.1 73.0 79.2

RES 16 Advantage +3.3 +12.2 +5.0 +6.1 +1.4 -0.5 +0.2 +2.6 -2.9Return on Investment +$3.97 +$56.48 +$14.00 +$20.49 -$7.24 -$18.45 -$14.32 -$0.16 -$32.61

Purpose: With the adaption of conservation tillage practices and increased plant populations also comes an increase in crop residue that has created some challenges with stand establishment and nutrient tie up. This study evaluates the use of RES 16™ in three different tillage systems. RES 16 is a bio-stimulant liquid enzyme that accelerates the decomposition of crop residue by stimulating soil microorganisms to break down organic matter. RES 16 applications were made in the fall prior to any tillage.

Summary: Corn After Soybeans: An application of RES 16™ provided an average yield advantage of 6.8 Bu./A. across all types of tillage in the corn following soybean rotation. This resulted in an average profit of $24.82. Both yields and profits increase in response to applications of RES 16 regardless of tillage practice. However, RES 16 provided a significantly larger increase in the no-till system compared to the other tillage systems.

Continuous Corn: RES 16™ provided an average yield advantage of 6.1 Bu./A. in the conventional-tillage portion of the corn after corn study. This resulted in a profit of $20.49/A. This is the second year in a row that RES 16 has provided a higher increase in both yield and profitability for conventional-tillage as compared to the other tillage systems tested in the corn after corn rotation. This is most likely due to the fact that a higher concentration of RES 16 came in contact with soil microorganisms in this high residue scenario, thus increasing the level of activity.

Soybeans After Corn: The no-till system showed a slight yield response to an application of RES 16™ in this crop rotation. However, the yield increase was not high enough to provide additional profits. This is the second year in a row that RES 16 has not provided a profitable yield increase for soybeans following corn.

Planted: CAC/CAB: April 2, 2012 Tillage: VariousBAC: April 24, 2012 Herbicide: CAC: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,

Harvested: CAC/CAB: August 30, 2012 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. GlyphosateBAC: October 4, 2012 CAB: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine, 8 oz.

Population: CAC/CAB: 34,000 seeds/A. Sterling Blue & 32 oz. GlyphosateBAC: 140,000 seeds/A. BAC: 1.3 qts. Dual & 32 oz. Glyphosate

Rows: Six 30" rows Product Tested: Phoenix 6442A4** Previous Crop: Soybeans / Corn & BECK 477NR™*

MULTI-YEAR SUMMARY

Treatment

Continous Corn Soybeans After Corn

Conv.Till

NoTill

StripTill

Conv.Till

NoTill

StripTill

RES 16™ 215.8 211.5 215.2 76.3 72.1 72.8Untreated 207.0 207.6 211.2 75.5 70.5 74.7

RES 16 Advantage 8.8 3.9 4.0 0.8 1.6 -1.9Return on Investment +$36.42 +$7.51 +$7.81 -$10.78 -$5.77 -$26.42


122


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Tillage Study - 2012Corn, Soybeans & Continuous Corn Rotations

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture corn and to 13% moisture beans.^Net return based on gross income minus cost of tillage, planting and burn-down herbicide pass. Cost for tillage, planting and burn-down pass were taken from the

results of the 2012 Ohio Farm Custom Rates Survey published by The Ohio State University.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.1Conventional-Till: CAB - A primary tillage pass in the fall followed by two passes with a field cultivator in the spring. CAC - Disk and primary tillage in the fall

followed by two passes with a field cultivator in the spring. BAC - Disk and primary tillage in the fall followed by one pass with a field cultivator in the spring, conventional-till planter.

2No-Till: extra burn-down pass with the sprayer, planter with attachments. 3Strip-Till: extra burn-down pass, strip-till bar with dry fertilizer and no-till planter with attachments.

2012 TILLAGE STUDY

Rotation / TillageHarvestedPopulation

Test†Weight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreYield vs. Conv.-Till

Net^Return

Profit vs. Conv.-Till

CONTINUOUS CORNConventional-Till1 33,639 54.9 23.5 214.2 $1,189.78No-Till2 34,833 55.4 23.0 209.8 -4.4 $1,214.72 $24.94Strip-Till3 35,000 54.6 23.2 217.2 3.0 $1,239.38 $49.60

SOYBEANS AFTER CORNConventional-Till1 130,017 ---- 15.5 82.2 $421.88No-Till2 135,817 ---- 14.8 74.3 -7.9 $414.77 -$7.11Strip-Till3 137,267 ---- 14.6 77.7 -4.5 $415.83 -$6.05

CORN AFTER SOYBEANSConventional-Till1

2012 CAB results discarded due to poor data quality.No-Till2Strip-Till3

Purpose: Over the past eight years there have been numerous tillage studies conducted at the Southern Indiana PFR farm to help our customers determine which system might work best for their farm. This is the fifth year for the tillage study in its current format; comparing conventional-tillage to both no-till and strip-tillage systems. These tillage practices were compared in both a corn after soybean rotation and 12th year continuous corn rotation. All fertilizer was applied as a broadcast application the previous fall. Net returns were calculated using 2012 custom machinery rates from recent surveys collected by The Ohio State University.

Planted: CAC/CAB: April 2, 2012 Tillage: VariousBAC: April 24, 2012 Herbicide: CAC: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,

Harvested: CAC/CAB: August 30, 2012 0.75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. GlyphosateBAC: October 4, 2012 CAB: 3 oz. Capreno & 1 qt. Atrazine

Population: CAC/CAB: 34,000 seeds/A. 8 oz. Dicamba & 32 oz. GlyphosateBAC: 140,000 seeds/A. BAC: 1.3 qts. Dual & 32 oz. Glyphosate

Rows: Six 30" rows Product Tested: Phoenix 6442A4** Previous Crop: Soybeans / Corn & BECK 477NR™*

MULTI-YEAR TILLAGE STUDY SUMMARY

Rotation / TillageHarvestedPopulation

Test†Weight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreYield vs. Conv.-Till

Net^Return

Profit vs. Conv.-Till

CONTINUOUS CORNConventional-Till1 32,519 57.1 21.7 209.3 $1,160.75No-Till2 29,438 56.5 21.6 197.7 -11.6 $1,143.09 -$17.66Strip-Till3 32,576 56.7 21.4 212.9 3.6 $1,213.89 $53.14

SOYBEANS AFTER CORNConventional-Till1 126,054 ---- 11.8 73.8 $372.38No-Till2 114,537 ---- 11.6 70.6 -3.2 $393.06 $20.68Strip-Till3 123,300 ---- 11.4 71.5 -2.3 $379.49 $7.11

CORN AFTER SOYBEANSConventional-Till1 31,795 58.5 20.6 211.4 $1,187.11No-Till2 28,842 58.6 21.3 195.4 -16.1 $1,129.61 -$57.50Strip-Till3 30,511 58.3 20.9 210.8 -0.6 $1,201.62 $14.51

Summary: Continuous Corn Strip-till provided the highest yields for the continuous corn rotation for the fifth year in a row with a 3.0 Bu./A. increase in yield and $49.60/A. in additional profits over conventional-tillage. No-till also shows a yield loss of 4.4 Bu./A., but still provided an additional profit of $24.94 over conventional-tillage in 2012. The five year summary shows a similar advantage for strip-till, but the no-till entry has averaged an 11.6 Bu./A. yield loss resulting in $17.66/A. in lost profits compared to conventional-tillage.

Soybeans After Corn Conventional-till soybeans out-yielded both the no-till soybeans by 7.9 Bu./A. and strip-till soybeans by 4.5 Bu./A. However, profit losses were lower than expected with no-till only losing $7.11/A. and the strip-till giving up $6.05/A. Over the past five years, no-till soybeans have yielded an average of 3.2 Bu./A. less than conventional-till soybean, but provided a profit increase of $20.68/A. Strip-till soybeans have yielded an average of 2.3 Bu./A. less with a profit increase of $7.11/A over the same five year period.

Corn After Soybeans The 2012 results from the corn after soybean portion of this study were dropped due to poor data quality. The four year trend shows 0.6 Bu./A. difference between conventional-tillage and strip-till, with strip-till providing an additional profit of $14.51/A. No-till has yielded an average of 16.1 Bu./A. less than conventional-tillage over the same period of time, resulting in a loss of approximately $57.50/A.


123

BECK’S Tillage Study - ContinuedCorn, Soybeans & Continuous Corn Rotations


124


Total 12.14 in.

Planted: April 2, 2012 Tillage: Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Harvested: August 30, 2012 Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,Population: 34,000 seeds/A. 8 oz. Sterling Blue (strip-till) &Rows: Various 32 oz. GlyphosatePrevious Crop: Soybeans Product Tested: Phoenix 5726A4**

Purpose: This study was set up to evaluate the practice of banding fertilizer in a strip-tillage system compared to broadcast fertilizer applications in a conventional-tillage system over a long-term period of time in a corn/soybean rotation. Both corn and soybeans were planted in 30” rows in order to place strips and plant between the rows from the previous crop in the strip-till replication.

2012 P & K STUDY

Fertilizer PopulationBushels†

Per AcreYield

AdvantageNet^

ReturnCONv.-TILL / BROADCAST FERTILIzERNo P & K Plow Down 33,500 87.6 ---- $516.84100 lbs. 9-23-30 33,333 106.7 +19.1 $601.53200 lbs. 9-23-30 32,667 119.3 +31.7 $647.87300 lbs. 9-23-30 31,833 126.6 +39.0 $662.94400 lbs. 9-23-30 33,833 143.8 +56.2 $736.42STRIP-TILL / BANDED FERTILIzERNo P & K Banded 33,667 77.6 ---- $457.84100 lbs. 9-23-30 32,667 94.3 +16.7 $528.37200 lbs. 9-23-30 33,500 121.0 +43.4 $657.90300 lbs. 9-23-30 33,667 125.5 +47.9 $656.45400 lbs. 9-23-30 33,500 151.7 +74.1 $783.03

BECK’S P & K Study on Corn After Soybeans - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on gross income of corn minus cost of DAP and Potash fertilizer. Corn $5.90/Bu. Potash $537.00/ton. DAP $584.00/ton.

5 YEAR P & K STUDY SUMMARY

Fertilizer

Soil Test P Soil Test K Corn After Soybeans

2007 2012 2007 2012 Pop. Bu./A. YieldAdv.

NetReturn

CONv.-TILL / BROADCAST FERTILIzERNo P & K Plow Down 96 45 480 266 31,117 172.8 --- $907.52100 lbs. 9-23-30 134 62 879 312 31,742 180.6 +7.7 $953.54200 lbs. 9-23-30 153 58 587 333 31,525 179.7 +6.9 $948.23300 lbs. 9-23-30 150 73 698 455 32,283 184.8 +12.0 $978.32400 lbs. 9-23-30 134 90 705 479 32,608 193.7 +20.9 $1,030.83

AVERAGE 31,855 182.3

STRIP-TILL / BROADCAST FERTILIzERNo P & K Banded 125 42 557 259 31,292 174.1 --- $1,026.98100 lbs. 9-23-30 96 52 467 328 31,129 178.0 +3.9 $1,022.11200 lbs. 9-23-30 106 70 487 315 32,163 181.1 +7.0 $1,012.49300 lbs. 9-23-30 154 117 585 454 31,679 183.8 +9.7 $1,000.36400 lbs. 9-23-30 N/A 131 N/A 479 31,963 191.9 +17.8 $1,019.91

AVERAGE 31,645 181.8

Summary: This was the first year in five years of testing that produced a profitable response to applying DAP and potash fertilizer in this study. Although the results from the 2010 and 2011 tests showed a slight yield increase for the 300 lbs. and 400 lbs. treatments over the untreated, they never produced an increase in profitability. This is primarily due to the fact that we began with above average soil test levels for P & K when this study began in 2007. The lack of soil moisture that accompanied this summer’s drought certainly limited nutrient availability, thus contributing to large yield increases as fertilizer rates increased this year. However, the decline in soil test levels of P & K over the time that this study has been conducted may also be starting to have an influence. Refer to the five year summary for changes in soil test values over the past six years. The decrease in P & K levels in the soil test, even at the 400 lbs. treatment level, may suggest that we are removing soil nutrients at a higher rate than expected with the yield increases that we have seen in recent years.


125

BECK’S P & K Study on Corn After Soybeans - Continued


126


Total 12.14 in.

Purpose: With the adoption of conservation tillage practices and increased plant populations also comes an increase in crop residue that has created some challenges with stand establishment and nutrient tie up. This study evaluates the use of RES 16™ to help breakdown residue and reduce nutrient tie up in a continuous corn rotation. RES 16 is a bio-stimulant liquid enzyme that accelerates the decomposition of crop residue by stimulating soil microorganisms to break down organic matter. RES 16™ applications were made in the fall prior to any tillage.

BECK’S Stalk Degradation Study - 2012Planted: April 7, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: August 31, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 3 oz. Capreno, 1 qt. Atrazine,Rows: Six 30" rows .75 oz. Impact & 32 oz. Glyphosate

Product Tested: BECK 7988BR

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on gross income minus the cost of RES 16 and UAN solution. Corn price $5.90/Bu. RES 16 $76.00/gal. 28% UAN solution $375.00/ton.RES 16 is a trademark of Bio-Enzyme.

Summary: The application of 28% UAN solution as a standalone treatment provided both the highest yield increase at 5.4 Bu./A. and highest net return in this year’s study. The combination of UAN solution and RES 16™ resulted in a 3.1 Bu./A. yield increase; however this was not enough to provide a profit. There were no visual differences in stalk degradation noted between entries at the time of planting in the spring.

TreatmentFinalStand

Test†


Bushels†

Per AcreRES 16

Adv.Net^

ReturnUntreated 33,333 57.8 23.2 211.2 ---- ----16 oz. RES 16™ w/ 15 gal./A. Water 32,583 58.2 23.4 208.3 -2.9 -$32.6116 oz. RES 16 w/ 0.5% Surfactant, 17 lbs. AMS/100 gal. Water, 15 gal. vol/A. 32,250 58.1 23.0 211.6 +0.4 -$13.14

16 oz. RES 16 w/ 3 lbs. AMS w/ 15 gal./A. 28% 33,333 57.8 22.6 214.3 +3.1 -$27.18

15 gal./A. 28% 33,833 58.0 22.8 216.5 +5.3 -$4.70


127


Total 12.14 in.

YieldRank Brand

Relative Maturity

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP III & Iv

1 BECK 423NL 4.2 16.1 85.12 BECK 431N 4.3 15.8 80.93 BECK 495NR™* 4.9 19.9 80.64 BECK 414N 4.1 15.2 79.35 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 15.8 79.36 BECK 389N 3.8 14.2 78.77 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 15.8 78.78 BECK 356NL 3.5 17.9 78.29 BECK 456NL 4.5 16.1 77.7

10 BECK 386NL 3.8 17.7 77.711 BECK 372NL 3.7 16.2 77.612 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 14.2 77.113 BECK 477NR™* 4.7 17.5 77.114 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 16.8 71.015 BECK 398NR 3.9 13.5 70.816 BECK 483NL 4.8 19.8 70.717 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 13.1 68.118 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 14.0 68.119 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 17.7 68.120 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 13.0 58.9

AVERAGE 16.0 75.2

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - 2012


Planted: May 8, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 10, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 120,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 1.3 pts. Dual, 8 oz. Shadow &Rows: Three 30" rows 16 oz. Flexstar


128


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Attempt - 2012Planted: Rep 1: April 24, 2012 Previous Crop: Corn

Rep 2: May 2, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Harvested: 375NR™*: September 21, 2012 Field Cultivator (twice)

444NR™*: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: 1.3 pts. DualPopulation: 140,000 seeds/A. 32 oz. GlyphosateRows: Eleven 15” rows

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.Pro-Soil Foundation is trademarks of Pro-Soil Ag Solutions. Protinus is a trademark of Wolf Trax. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop BioScience.

Bio-Forge ST is a registered trademark of Stoller, USA. Cobra is a registered trademark of Valent U.S.A. Corporation.

Purpose: This is the fifth year that we have attempted to break our 100 bushel soybean goal at the Southern Indiana PFR farm. Two varieties were tested in this year’s study: BECK 375NR™* (3.7 relative maturity) and BECK 444NR™* (4.4 relative maturity). The control entries in this year’s study were treated with Beck’s standard Escalate yield enhancement system. The remaining entries were all treated with Escalate, as well as Protinus™ (a seed applied nutrient product containing zinc, manganese and iron), Optimize®, and Bio-Forge® ST (anti-oxidant to minimize early season stresses). All treatments were planted at 140,000 seeds/A. and received an application of Headline® fungicide and Warrior II® insecticide at the R4 growth stage. The goal of the various treatments tested in this study was to encourage early vegetative growth to develop more nodes and help with flower and pod retention. These treatments include using an application of ammonium sulfate at planting and the use of Pro-Soil Foundation™ (a plant and soil nutrient consisting of a concentrated base of vitamins, hormones, and enzymes as well as root stimulants, plant growth regulators, and chelated trace minerals). A portion of those entries were then sprayed with Cobra®, a diphenyl-ether herbicide, to shorten the internodes and help with standability.

Treatments Applied Prior to Flowering

PercentMoisture

Rep. 1Bushels†

Per Acre

Rep. 2Bushels†

Per Acre

AverageBushels†

Per AcreYield Increase vs. Standard

BECK 375NR™*

Standard Practice 15.0 78.9 83.3 81.1 ----100 Bu. Treatment 15.3 82.9 83.7 83.3 2.2Pro-Soil Foundation™ 15.7 79.1 83.4 81.3 0.2Pro-Soil + Cobra® @ V5 17.2 84.8 88.5 86.7 5.675 lb. Ammonium Sulfate 15.8 84.4 85.3 84.9 3.875 lb. Ammonium Sulfate + Cobra @ V5 17.7 85.0 93.5 89.3 8.2BECK 444NR™*

Standard Practice 13.7 81.1 81.2 81.2 ----100 Bu. Treatment 13.7 81.5 85.3 83.4 2.2Pro-Soil Foundation 13.8 81.4 82.8 82.1 0.9Pro-Soil + Cobra @ V5 13.7 78.0 85.2 81.6 0.475 lb. Ammonium Sulfate 13.6 84.0 86.0 85.0 3.875 lb. Ammonium Sulfate + Cobra @ V5 13.8 85.9 85.2 85.6 4.4

Treatments Applied Prior to Flowering

PercentMoisture

Rep. 1Bushels†

Per Acre

Rep. 2Bushels†

Per Acre

AverageBushels†

Per AcreYield Increase vs. Standard

Treatment SummaryStandard Practice 14.4 80.0 82.3 81.1 ----100 Bu. Treatment 14.5 82.2 84.5 83.4 2.2Pro-Soil Foundation™ 14.8 80.3 83.1 81.7 0.5Pro-Soil + Cobra® @ V5 15.5 81.4 86.9 84.1 3.075 lb. Ammonium Sulfate 14.7 84.2 85.7 84.9 3.875 lb. Ammonium Sulfate + Cobra @ V5 15.8 85.5 89.4 87.4 6.3


129

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Attempt - Continued

Summary: This year’s attempt resulted in a high yield of 93.5 Bu./A. This year's highest yielding entry was BECK 375NR™* treated with the Escalate yield enhancement system as well as Protinus™, Optimize® and Bio-Forge® ST seed treatments. 75 lbs. of ammonium sulfate was then incorporated at planting followed by post-emergence treatments of Cobra at V5 as well as Headline and Warrior II at R4. This yield tied for our second highest yield produced in this study over the past 5 years! Overall, yields were much better than expected considering the drought conditions experienced throughout June and July. This proves that providing the potential for high yielding soybeans by planting early, proper variety selection and protecting that yield potential with seed treatments and a few in season management practices allowed the beans in this study to take advantage of the late season rains that were received in August and September to maximize yield!

The use of ammonium sulfate at planting and Cobra® herbicide both provided promising results this year. Cobra® applied at V5 burned the foliage of the plant temporarily which in turn shortened the internodes and overall plant height. This resulted in an average yield increase of 2.5 Bu./A. when following both Pro-Soil Foundation and ammonium sulfate. The use of ammonium sulfate at planting increased yields by an average of 1.6 Bu./A. over the 100 Bushel treatment entries. The combination of ammonium sulfate and Cobra provided an average increase of 4.1 Bu./A. over the 100 Bushel treatment entries.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.Pro-Soil Foundation is trademarks of Pro-Soil Ag Solutions. Protinus is a trademark of Wolf Trax. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop BioScience Bio-Forge ST is a registered trademark of Stoller, USA. Cobra is a registered trademark of Valent U.S.A. Corporation.


130


Total 12.14 in.

Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of utilizing a residual compound as part of a soybean herbicide program. Dual II Magnum® was the residual compound used in this year’s study. We also took this opportunity to evaluate if there were any negative effects to late season “rescue” applications of post emergence herbicides that might get applied later than their legal label limit.

BECK’S Soybean Herbicide Systems Study - 2012Planted: April 24, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: LL: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip /

RR: September 20, 2012 Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 140,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: VariousRows: Five 15" rows Products Tested: LL: BECK 386NLReplications: Two (averaged) RR: BECK 398NR

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.LibertyLink is a registered trademark of Bayer. Roundup Ready is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC. Dual II Magnum is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company.

Summary: This year’s study showed mixed results for the use of a residual compound. The use of a residual in the Roundup Ready® system resulted in a 2 Bu./A. loss; however, it provided a 2 Bu./A. increase in the LibertyLink® system. Due to the dry conditions that we experience throughout most of the summer, there was no difference in weed competition between the residual and non-residual treatments. Although a yield benefit may not be seen every year, we strongly recommend the use of a residual compound as part of any soybean herbicide program in an effort to rotate herbicide chemistries and deter the development of herbicide resistance.

In terms of crop injury, the application of glyphosate at the R2 growth stage resulted in a loss of 3.8 Bu./A. Glyphosate applied to Roundup Ready® soybeans at the R3 and R4 growth stages had no effect on yield. Applications of Liberty on LibertyLink soybeans at the R2, R3 and R4 growth stages lowered yield by -3.2, -2.2 and -3.3 Bu./A. respectively. We will continue to evaluate the potential for crop injury with late season post-emergence applications in the future.

Pre-EmergeHerbicide

First PostHerbicide Pass

Second PostHerbicide Pass

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre+/- No Control

Roundup ReadyNone Glyphosate ---- 12.5 90.5 +2.0Residual Glyphosate ---- 13.1 88.5 ----Residual Glyphosate Glyphosate @ R2 13.5 84.7 -3.8Residual Glyphosate Glyphosate @ R3 13.7 90.3 +1.8Residual Glyphosate Glyphosate @ R4 13.2 91.0 +2.5LibertyLinkNone Liberty ---- 14.1 81.2 -2.0Residual Liberty ---- 13.9 83.2 ----Residual Liberty Liberty @ R2 14.0 80.0 -3.2Residual Liberty Liberty @ R3 14.1 81.0 -2.2Residual Liberty Liberty @ R4 14.5 79.9 -3.3


131


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Soybean Planting Date Study - 2012Planted: Various Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: 150,000 Herbicide: 1.3 pts. DualRows: Eleven 15” rows 32 oz. Glyphosate

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of multiple varieties with various maturities on several dates throughout the growing season.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a

registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

PLANTING DATE SUMMARY

PlantingDate Brand

Bushels†

Per AcreApril 12th BECK 294NR™* 67.0

BECK 398NR 87.6BECK 444NR™* 69.2

AVERAGE 74.6April 23rd BECK 294NR™* 76.5

BECK 398NR 85.8BECK 444NR™* 80.7

AVERAGE 81.0April 30th BECK 294NR™* 74.0

BECK 398NR 84.1BECK 444NR™* 81.5

AVERAGE 79.9May 8th BECK 294NR™* 71.6

BECK 398NR 80.2BECK 444NR™* 82.0

AVERAGE 77.9May 16th BECK 294NR™* 65.9

BECK 398NR 74.7BECK 444NR™* 82.1

AVERAGE 74.2May 25th BECK 398NR 75.4

BECK 444NR™* 71.2AVERAGE 73.3

June 1st BECK 398NR 69.2BECK 444NR™* 70.6

AVERAGE 69.9June 8th BECK 398NR 66.1

BECK 444NR™* 57.2AVERAGE 61.7

vARIETY SUMMARY

BrandBushels†

Per AcreAPRIL 12th - MAY 16th

BECK 294NR™* 71.0BECK 398NR 82.5BECK 444NR™ 79.1APRIL 12th - JUNE 8th

BECK 398NR 77.9BECK 444NR™* 74.3

Summary: This year’s highest yielding planting date was April 23rd. Yields continued to be very good throughout the entire season considering the drought conditions that were experienced in June and July. Timely rains during August and September made this year’s soybean crop by ensuring good pod fill. BECK 398NR out-yielded BECK 444NR™* by an average of 3.6 Bu./A. across all planting dates in 2012. This is only the second year in the eight year history of this study at the Southern Indiana PFR farm that the group III variety out-yielded the group IV variety across all planting dates. BECK 294NR™* produced its highest yield of 76.4 Bu./A. on April 23rd. On average it yielded 11.5 Bu./A. less than BECK 398NR and 8.1 Bu./A. less than BECK 444NR™* on planting date entries through May 16th.

The long term summary chart represents the yield trend for Group III and Group IV soybeans by planting date over the past eight years. This data shows the highest yield potential (< 1 Bu./A. difference) for soybeans being planted between April 20th and May 15th.

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

4/17 4/27 5/7 5/17 5/27 6/6 6/16 6/26 7/6

Bu./A.

Planting Date

8 Year Soybean Planting Date Trend Group III & IV


132


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Soybean Population Study - 2012Planted: Various Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field Cultivator (twice)Population: Various Herbicide: 1.3 pts. DualRows: Eleven 15” rows 32 oz. Glyphosate

Product Tested: BECK 444NR™*

Summary: This year’s study showed a seeding rate of 100,000 seeds/A. to be the most profitable for soybeans planted on April 23rd and May 8th. This correlates closely with the results we collected over the previous three years showing a 3 Bu./A. difference in yield regardless of the target seeding rate used for soybeans planted by mid-May. It should be noted that the final stands on these two planting dates exceeded 100,000 plants/A. except for one entry. Similar research conducted by the University of Kentucky suggests that evenly spaced, final stands of 80,000 - 100,000 plants/A. are adequate to achieve high yields for first crop soybeans.

By extending this study to evaluate a wider range of planting dates, we discovered that the optimum seeding rate to maximize profitability increased to 150,000 seeds/A. on May 25th and 175,000 seeds/A. on June 8th in 2012. Note that the average final stand of these two later planting dates is lower than those of the two earlier planting dates. This, along with the fact that later planted soybeans do not achieve as much vegetative growth and thus have fewer nodes and pods, determines the need to increase seeding rates with later planting dates to achieve maximum profitability. Seeding rate data collected from the Southern Indiana PFR farm over the past seven years shows the optimum seeding rate for double crop soybeans to be 220,000 seeds/A.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on gross income minus approximate cost of seed. Gross income is based on $13.20 Bu./A. soybeans.

PlantingDate

Target Population

Emerged Population

Bushels†

Per AcreApprox.

Seed CostNet^

ReturnNet Return

RankApril 23rd 100,000 90,997 84.5 $35.42 $1,079.98 1

125,000 121,975 84.6 $44.27 $1,072.45 2150,000 145,208 80.7 $53.12 $1,012.12 3175,000 158,761 80.0 $61.98 $994.02 5200,000 205,228 80.7 $70.83 $994.41 4

AVERAGE 144,434 82.1May 8th 100,000 108,422 82.7 $35.42 $1,056.22 1

125,000 118,103 80.6 $44.27 $1,019.65 3150,000 123,911 82.0 $53.12 $1,029.28 2175,000 156,825 81.3 $61.98 $1,011.18 5200,000 178,122 82.1 $70.83 $1,012.89 4

AVERAGE 137,077 81.7May 25th 100,000 81,317 65.4 $35.42 $827.86 5

125,000 102,614 68.2 $44.27 $855.97 4150,000 120,039 71.2 $53.12 $886.72 1175,000 129,719 70.9 $61.98 $873.90 2200,000 133,592 71.1 $70.83 $867.69 3

AVERAGE 113,456 69.4June 8th 100,000 73,572 52.3 $35.42 $654.94 5

125,000 98,742 56.9 $44.27 $706.81 2150,000 69,700 57.2 $53.12 $701.92 3175,000 106,486 60.8 $61.98 $740.58 1200,000 77,444 55.6 $70.83 $663.09 4

AVERAGE 85,189 56.6

Purpose: In addition to selecting high yielding varieties, it is important to know the correct seeding rate to maximize yield and profitability. This study compares a wide range of seeding rates across various planting dates to determine the most profitable seeding rate for each date. The goal is to determine at what point in the season seeding rates need to be increased to maximize profitability as planting progresses later in the season.


133


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Soybean Soil Health Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.BioRed is a trademark of Biovante. Soil Plus II is a trademark of Cropchem Research, Inc. Pro-Soil Foundation and Pro-Soil Vital Boost Triple 3 are trademarks

of Pro-Soil Ag Solutions.

Planted: May 2, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field CultivatorRows: Various 30” rows Herbicide: 1.3 pts. Dual & 32 oz. GlyphosatePopulation: 140,000 seeds/A. Product Tested: BECK 418NR™*


Summary: This year’s study failed to show a yield benefit for any of the products tested. Note that there are other means of measuring soil health such as improved soil structure, increases in microorganism populations, and increased nutrient availability. We will continue to evaluate various methods of improving soil health in future testing.


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceControl 17.3 81.1 ----24 oz. S-120320 16.7 80.7 -0.42 gal. P-256 17.0 80.0 -1.1Pro-Soil: 16 oz. Foundation f/b 12.8 oz. Triple 3 17.2 78.8 -2.31 ton/A. Gypsum 16.9 77.6 -3.532 oz. Soil + II 17.5 75.7 -5.41 qts. BioRed 17.1 76.0 -5.1

Purpose: Over the years, the Beck’s Practical Farm Research team has evaluated a wide range of management techniques and new technologies to help our growers identify practices that improve their overall farm profitability. In recent years we have taken particular interest in how cultural practices such as reduced tillage and cover crops affect the long term sustainability of our soils and ultimately, long term profitability. Those inquiries have led our team into a new area of study that is referred to as soil health. This encompasses both the aforementioned cultural practices as well as products that might have value as soil health amendments or as mediums for helping to feed and promote the activity of soil microorganisms. See the list below for a description of the products tested in this year’s study.

S-120320: A liquid biological formulation of micronutrients, enzymes and other natural organic compounds that enhance microbial breakdown.

P-256: A liquid biological combination of enzymes, beneficial bacteria and other organisms designed to enhance soil microbial health & tilth.

Pro-Soil Foundation™: A plant and soil nutrient consisting of quality fertilizers, chelated trace minerals and non-ionic surfactant. This product also contains a concentrated base of vitamins, hormones and enzymes; root stimulants and plant growth regulators. The foundation is used as a soil-applied broadcast application targeted as a soil building product.

Pro-Soil vital Boost Triple 3™: This is a similar product to the Pro-Soil Foundation that is designed as a foliar feed with a higher percentage of trace minerals and micronutrients.

Gypsum: A pH neutral soil amendment consisting of calcium sulfate that is noted for improving soil tilth and water infiltration by improving soil permeability while decreasing runoff and crusting.

Soil Plus II™: A unique combination of plant substances in a humic acid base intended for root growth by providing supplemental plant nutrients.

BioRed™: A 100% organic bacteria product containing a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic microogranisms that produce plant growth activators within the soil which support the functions of growth and maturity in plants.


134


Total 12.14 in.

BECK’S Soybean Foliar Fungicide Study - 2012Planted: April 24, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Disk / Disk-Rip / Field CultivatorPopulation: 140,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 1.3 pts. Dual & 32 oz. GlyphosateRows: Eleven 15” rows Product Tested: BECK 432NR™*

Purpose: In recent years, interest in using fungicides to control foliar diseases in soybeans has grown as Asian Soybean Rust in the far southern states has increased. Testing of foliar fungicides in preparation for rust control has led to the discovery that these products could be used for other yield enhancing qualities due to their ability to maintain plant health and seed quality. This test is our continued look into the profitability of both foliar fungicides and insecticides for our growers.

Fungicide ApplicationDate

SprayedGrowthStage

Bushels† Per Acre

YieldAdvantage

Return on^ Investment

1.24 oz. Warrior® June 20 R2 86.7 +5.7 +$64.78Untreated 81.0 ---- ----6 oz. Headline® 82.8 +1.8 -$1.696 oz. Headline + 1.24 oz. Warrior 80.9 -0.1 -$31.231.24 oz. Warrior June 25 R2 77.5 -1.9 -$35.54Untreated 79.4 ---- ----6 oz. Headline 78.9 -0.5 -$32.056 oz. Headline + 1.24 oz. Warrior 74.1 -5.3 -$99.871.24 oz. Warrior July 6 R3 72.3 +0.9 +$1.42Untreated 71.4 ---- ----6 oz. Headline 74.7 +3.3 +$18.116 oz. Headline + 1.24 oz. Warrior 75.4 +4.0 +$22.891.24 oz. Warrior July 13 R3 76.5 -0.3 -$14.42Untreated 76.8 ---- ----6 oz. Headline 81.7 +4.9 +$39.236 oz. Headline + 1.24 oz. Warrior 82.4 +5.6 +$44.011.24 oz. Warrior July 20 R4 82.6 -0.8 -$21.02Untreated 83.4 ---- ----6 oz. Headline 87.9 +4.5 +$33.956 oz. Headline + 1.24 oz. Warrior 88.0 +4.6 +$30.81

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Return on investment based on yield advantage times $13.20/Bu. soybeans minus cost of fungicide, insecticide and application. Headline $415.00/gal. Warrior

II $460.00/gal. Application $6.00/A.Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Warrior II with Zeon is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company.

4 YEAR SUMMARY


135

Insecticide / Fungicide ApplicationGrowth Stage

Bushels† Per Acre

Yield Advantage

Return on Investment^

Insecticide R2 79.6 -0.1 -$12.11Untreated 79.8Fungicide Only 80.9 +1.1 -$10.60Fungicide/Insecticide 80.0 +0.2 -$27.27Insecticide R3 77.2 +1.0 +$2.30Untreated 76.2Fungicide Only 80.8 +4.6 +$34.83Fungicide/Insecticide 81.4 +5.2 +$38.73Insecticide R4 78.6 +0.5 -$3.86Untreated 78.1Fungicide Only 80.4 +2.3 +$4.91Fungicide/Insecticide 80.5 +2.4 +$1.24

BECK’S Soybean Foliar Fungicide Study - Continued

Summary: The 2012 data shows profitable yield advantages when using a foliar fungicide both alone or in combination with a pyrethroid insecticide when applications were made at R3, late R3 and R4. A profitable response to using insecticide alone was noted on June 20th (R2) and on July 6th (R3). The four year summary suggests that the likelihood of seeing profitable results from the use of foliar fungicide and insecticide applications are highest during the R3 growth stage. However, studies conducted in recent years tend to trend toward a close correlation between the timing of application and rainfall events.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Return on investment based on yield advantage times $13.20/Bu. soybeans minus cost of fungicide, insecticide and application. Headline $415.00/gal. Warrior II $460.00/gal. Application $6.00/A.Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Warrior II with Zeon is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company.

Case #23: Area farmers were stunned at the success of one particular farmer. The detective was going to get to the bottom of it.

Slamming his fist on the table, the detective began to question the farmer. “How were you able to reduce your overall risk by working with only one seed company?"


Case #52: The farmer's wife sat calmly as the detective proceeded to question her. People in the community were curious how her family had achieved so much success

in just one season. And the detective was going to pursue the answer.

"Where were you and your family this past planting season? You must be doing something different."

Scan the QR code or visit www.suspectofsuccess.com to watch her interrogation.

Case #23: Area farmers were stunned at the success of one particular farmer. The detective was going to get to the bottom of it.

Slamming his fist on the table, the detective began to question the farmer. “How were you able to reduce your overall risk by working with only one seed company?"


Case #52: The farmer's wife sat calmly as the detective proceeded to question her. People in the community were curious how her family had achieved so much success

in just one season. And the detective was going to pursue the answer.

"Where were you and your family this past planting season? You must be doing something different."

Scan the QR code or visit www.suspectofsuccess.com to watch her interrogation.

Central Illinois PFR

138


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Corn Show Plot - 2012Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rows

YieldRank Brand

Test†


Bushels†

Per Acre1 Phoenix 6442A4** 55.5 23.2 226.82 Phoenix 5642A4** 55.9 24.0 215.63 BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 57.8 20.5 215.04 BECK 6626AMX™* 57.9 24.4 210.75 BECK 6272HR™* 59.3 20.0 205.06 Phoenix 6948A3** 57.1 23.9 200.77 BECK 5509A3 57.4 18.9 199.78 BECK 6733HXR™* 58.4 21.6 197.09 BECK 6179VT3 58.3 18.3 193.7

10 BECK 6175AMX™* 59.4 19.1 192.511 Phoenix 5726A4** 55.7 23.2 191.712 Phoenix 5552E** 56.1 19.5 190.913 BECK 5442VT3 57.3 19.4 188.414 Phoenix 5832A3** 58.5 21.1 188.415 BECK 4536A3 55.4 16.1 185.016 BECK 5435wx™* 58.4 20.3 185.017 BECK 6187wx™* 59.2 20.5 179.918 BECK 4530HXR™* 59.2 16.8 178.619 BECK 6077AM™* 58.5 19.3 172.520 BECK EX 0251 56.2 15.9 171.421 BECK 5269HXR™* 59.9 17.7 171.222 BECK 5475AMX™* 60.4 18.7 170.423 BECK 5246HR™* 58.7 18.7 165.7

24 Phoenix 5385A3** 57.0 19.5 165.4

25 BECK 6111HXR™* 60.6 19.4 156.9AVERAGE 57.9 20.0 188.7



139


Total 12.99 in.

Summary: Due to the 2012 drought, we were unsuccessful in raising 300 Bu./A. corn at the Central Illinois PFR location. Even though 300 Bu./A. corn was not accomplished, we did grow some very high yielding corn with average yields of 239.5 Bu./A. in the high management compared to 217.9 Bu./A. in the control. BECK 5475AMX™* was this year’s yield winner at 244.4 Bu./A. This was very exciting as BECK 5475AMX™* is a newly released corn hybrid for the 2013 growing season.

In attempting 300 Bu./A. corn, not only is it important to evaluate overall yield results, but economic returns must be considered as well. It is one thing to increase yields, but if it does not result in positive net returns, it is not a worthwhile program financially or environmentally. In this year's study, overall high yield attempt treatments increased yield by 21.6 Bu./A., as well as increasing returns by $9.39/A. All of the hybrids, with the exception of Phoenix 5552A4**, proved to show positive economic returns.

In 2013 we will try once again to reach the 300 Bu./A. yield level. With a little help from mother nature and Beck's strong genetics and traits, we strongly believe we will reach this goal very soon.

BECK’S 300 Bushel Attempt - 2012Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 15, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: Various Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows

Brand Treatment ProgramPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceGross^ Return

NetAdvantage

BECK 5475AMX™* Control 18.9 219.9BECK 5509A3 Control 21.9 218.1Phoenix 5552A4** Control 25.7 216.6Phoenix 5642A4** Control 24.8 220.5BECK 6175AMX™* Control 22.3 214.4

AVERAGE 217.9

BECK 5475AMX™* High Yield 18.8 244.4 +24.5 $144.55 +$26.24BECK 5509A3 High Yield 19.6 238.4 +20.3 $119.77 +$1.46Phoenix 5552A4** High Yield 22.4 236.5 +19.9 $116.82 -$1.49Phoenix 5642A4** High Yield 20.9 243.2 +22.7 $133.93 +$15.62BECK 6175AMX™* High Yield 20.6 235.2 +20.8 $122.72 +$4.41

AVERAGE 239.5 +21.6 $127.56 +$9.25†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn and cost of treatment (listed in table below).VersaMax is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc. Instinct is a trademark of Dow AgroSciences. Headline AMP is registered trademarks of BASF.

Purpose: To reach 300 bushel corn yields at the Central Illinois Practical Farm Research location. This is our sixth year attempting to reach 300 bushel corn.

This year’s 300 bushel attempt was based on a high management program compared to a control. The control program consisted of a normal 180 lbs. nitrogen rate for corn after soybeans and populations of 34,000 seeds/A. No other treatments were made in this control program. The high management yield program consisted of the various treatments which are listed in the High Yield Treatment table below. These treatments were used in an effort to ramp up yields to 300 Bu./A. Additionally, all treatments were used in individual PFR research plots in 2012. Please refer to the Table of Contents to find each plot summary.

High Yield Treatment Cost/A.2 gal. EezyCal $10.0050 lbs. Nitrogen $33.506 oz. Headline AMP® @ VT $22.031 qt. VersaMax™ @ V5 $5.125 gal. 7-22-5 Pop-up $15.003000 Plant Population Increase $10.31Soil Applied Insecticide $12.00Instinct™ Nitrogen Stabilizer Preplant $10.40

$118.31


140


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Study - 2012Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 11, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 37,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rowsReplications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Cost of Treatment

Net^ Return


Phoenix 5642A4**

Control 19.2 94.5 ---- $557.55 0 $541.67 ----3 oz. Headline® @ V5 19.2 104.9 +10.40 $618.91 $9.73 $591.56 +$49.88 V5 + VT Combo 19.5 113.7 +19.20 $670.83 $37.76 $612.60 +$70.9310 oz. Headline AMP® @ VT 19.5 114.0 +19.50 $672.60 $28.03 $624.05 +$82.38

AVERAGE 19.4 106.8 +16.37 $629.97 $25.17 592.47 +$67.73

BECK 5442vT3Control 18.5 100.0 ---- $590.00 0 576.00 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 18.5 107.0 +7.00 $631.30 $9.73 606.59 +$30.59 V5 + VT Combo 18.5 116.8 +16.80 $689.12 $37.76 635.01 +$59.0110 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 18.5 113.0 +13.00 $666.70 $28.03 622.85 +$46.85

AVERAGE 18.5 109.2 +12.27 $644.28 $25.17 610.11 $45.48

Phoenix 5385A3**

Control 18.5 122.1 ---- $720.39 0 720.39 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 19.0 128.1 +6.00 $755.79 $9.73 746.06 +$22.27 V5 + VT Combo 19.2 128.7 +6.60 $759.33 $37.76 721.57 +$3.3510 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 19.1 125.6 +3.50 $741.04 $28.03 713.01 -$10.88

AVERAGE 19.0 126.1 +5.37 $744.14 $25.17 725.26 $2.68

BECK 5509A3Control 17.9 96.5 ---- $569.35 0 569.35 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 18.0 99.7 +3.20 $588.23 $9.73 578.50 +$8.38 V5 + VT Combo 18.5 108.4 +11.90 $639.56 $37.76 601.80 +$28.4710 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 18.4 106.9 +10.40 $630.71 $28.03 602.68 +$29.99

AVERAGE 18.2 102.9 +8.50 $606.96 $25.17 588.08 $22.28

BECK 6077HR™*

Control 18.7 78.4 ---- $462.56 0 462.56 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 18.7 77.9 -0.50 $459.61 $9.73 449.88 -$12.61V5 + VT Combo 19.2 78.1 -0.30 $460.79 $37.76 423.03 -$41.0510 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 20.2 77.6 -0.80 $457.84 $28.03 429.81 -$37.29

AVERAGE 19.2 78.0 -0.53 $460.20 $25.17 441.32 -$30.31

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of Headline® and Headline AMP® fungicide at various treatment timings. Treatments will consist of 3 oz. of Headline at the V5 growth stage, 10 oz. of Headline AMP at full tassel (VT), as well as a combination of both treatments. Full tassel or VT applications are most commonly used in our marketing area. However, over the past few years there has been a focus on early preventative fungicide applications at or near the V5 growth stage.


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Cost of Treatment

Net^ Return


BECK 6179vT3Control 17.7 103.3 ---- $609.47 0 $609.47 ----3 oz. Headline® @ V5 17.8 107.0 +3.7 $631.30 $9.73 $621.57 +$11.27 V5 + VT Combo 17.9 115.5 +12.2 $681.45 $37.76 $643.69 +$31.9810 oz. Headline AMP® @ VT 17.9 112.7 +9.4 $664.93 $28.03 $636.90 +$25.51

AVERAGE 17.8 109.6 +8.4 $646.79 $25.17 627.91 $22.92

BECK 6175AMX™*

Control 18.5 151.5 ---- $893.85 0 $893.85 ----3 oz. Headline @ V5 18.6 154.1 +2.6 $909.19 $9.73 $899.46 +$4.36 V5 + VT Combo 18.7 162.7 +11.2 $959.93 $37.76 $922.17 +$25.4510 oz. Headline AMP @ VT 18.6 167.4 +15.9 $987.66 $28.03 $959.63 +$62.88

AVERAGE 18.2 158.9 +9.9 $937.66 $25.17 $918.78 $30.99


141

5642A4 5442VT3 5385A3 5509A3 6077HR 6179VT3 6175HXR

V5 Fungicide Return $49.88 $30.59 $22.27 $8.38 -$12.61 $11.27 $4.63

-$20.00

-$10.00

$0.00

$10.00

$20.00

$30.00

$40.00

$50.00

$60.00

Net

Ret

urn

/ Acr

e

V5 3 oz. Headline Net Return / Acre

5642A4 5442VT3 5385A3 5509A3 6077HR 6179VT3 6175HXR

VT Fungicide Return $82.38 $46.85 -$10.88 $29.99 -$37.29 $25.51 $62.88

-$60.00

-$40.00

-$20.00

$0.00

$20.00

$40.00

$60.00

$80.00

$100.00

Net

Ret

urn

/ Acr

e

VT Headline Amp: Return/Acre

BECK’S Corn Fungicide Study - Continued

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.Headline and Headline AMP are a registered trademarks of BASF. ^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. Headline cost of $9.73 for 3 oz. (no application cost as it was applied with herbicide). Headline AMP cost of $22.03/A.

and $6.00/A. application cost.

Summary: V5 Headline applications offered 4.6 Bu./A. average yield increases and netted an average return of $16.35/A. Figure 1 shows the net return of all hybrids in the study. Of the seven hybrids that were tested, six proved to show positive returns.

VT applications of Headline AMP offered average yield gains of 10.1 Bu./A. with net profits of $28.49/A. Phoenix 5385A3** and BECK 6077HR™* were the only two hybrids that had negative returns from VT applications. Figure 2 illustrates the net returns of all the hybrids tested at the VT timings.

Combination treatments of both V5 and VT applications did not offer any additional benefit over the stand-alone VT treatments. In fact, combination treatments resulted in negative returns of -$4.16/A. compared to the VT applications.

More testing is needed to truly understand the value of preventative V5 fungicide treatments, but it is clear in our testing program that VT applications currently are giving the best yield results and net returns. We must pay close attention to weather conditions, crop rotation, leaf disease presence, as well as fungicide response ratings for each hybrid to fully comprehend and evaluate fungicide applications.

Figure 2.Figure 1.


142


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Twin Row vs. 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - 2012

Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Field CultivatorPopulation: 24,000 to 48,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Two twin rows

Three 20" rowsTwo 30" rows

Soil Type: Silty Clay Loam

Purpose: This study compares ten hybrids in 20”, 30” and twin row spacing at final populations ranging from 24,000 to 48,000 to evaluate population trends and row width configurations.

Twin row 20" row30" row



143

BECK’S Twin Row vs. 20" vs. 30" Row Width / Population Study - Continued

Twin row 20" row30" row

PopulationSummary:

Higher populations have definitely been showing an increase in yield in our PFR locations the last several years. This year, at the Central Illinois PFR location, we saw the highest yields in 20” rows and twin rows coming from the 36,000 population, while the highest yield in the 30” rows came from the 44,000 population. On the 20” rows and twin rows, we also saw the yields decline at each population above 36,000. The 30” rows were fairly flat from 28,000 all the way up to 44,000 and then dropped to the lowest yield and return (after subtracting the additional seed cost) when we went to 48,000 population. The charts on the previous page show how each hybrid performed at each population in the three different row width configurations. Graph 1 represents how all the hybrids did at the various populations and row width configuration. Graph 2 shows the gross return per acre minus the seed costs at the various populations. Keep in mind that all of the populations listed in this study are final. We overplant and thin to the desired stand.


Twin rows had the highest overall yield across all populations this year. Twin rows also took the top spots in both yield and return per acre at the 36,000 final stand. This return per acre (see Graph 2 above) is calculated by taking the yield and seed costs into consideration at each of the harvest populations. Thirty inch rows took second place overall in the study this year and their top return came from the 28,000 population. It is interesting to note that the highest yield in the 30” rows came from the 44,000 population which is a little higher than we might expect based off of other years and locations. 20” rows were third place in the trial across all the populations combined. They topped out yield and return per acre at the 36,000 final population. 36,000 in 20” rows was the second highest yield and return in the entire study, however the higher populations were the cause for the overall lower yield in the 20” row configuration. Please contact your seed sales representative if you have questions about which products to use in different row width configurations. There are several factors that enter into this decision in addition to the yield results listed in the various PFR studies.


Graph 2.Graph 1.


144


Total 12.99 in.

YieldRank Brand

PercentMoisture

Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A. +/-30" Rows

Gross^Return

Net Advantage

30" Rows3 BECK 5475AMX™* 19.2 60.5 206.5 $1,218.352 BECK 6175AMX™* 20.7 59.2 210.5 $1,241.951 Phoenix 6948A3** 25.4 57.0 212.5 $1,253.754 Phoenix 5552A4** 21.3 56.4 206.0 $1,215.405 BECK 5509A3 20.8 55.0 202.5 $1,194.756 BECK 6179VT3 19.0 57.1 197.2 $1,163.48

AVERAGE 21.1 57.5 205.9 $1,214.81Twin Rows

3 BECK 5475AMX™* 19.6 60.9 208.5 +2.0 $1,230.15 +$11.801 BECK 6175AMX™* 21.1 59.9 219.0 +8.5 $1,292.10 +$50.154 Phoenix 6948A3** 26.1 57.0 206.5 -6.0 $1,218.35 -$35.402 Phoenix 5552A4** 20.5 56.0 212.9 +6.9 $1,256.11 +$40.716 BECK 5509A3 20.7 55.0 200.3 -2.2 $1,181.77 -$12.985 BECK 6179VT3 19.2 57.9 201.1 +3.9 $1,186.49 +$21.01

AVERAGE 21.2 57.8 208.1 +2.2 $1,227.50 +$12.88

BECK’S 30" vs. Twin Rows Study - 2012

Purpose: This study is designed to evaluate the yield differences of 30” and twin row corn. Six hybrids are planted in this study at the same population of 35,000 seeds/A. in a continuous corn rotation. Each row width has the same overall management program, with the exception of the planter used to plant the plot. The 30” rows are planted with a John Deere 7000 finger pickup planter, while the twin rows are planted with a Great Plains YP425A air planter (shown at right).

Planted: April 22, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 36,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rows / twinReplications: Two (averaged)

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Gross return based on $5.90 corn.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

Adv

anta

ge fo

r Tw

in R

ows

30" Rows vs. Twins Rows Bu./A. Advantage

BECK 5475AMX™*

BECK 6175AMX™*

Phoenix 6948A3**

Phoenix 5552A4**

BECK 5509A3

BECK 6179VT3

Summary: Overall, twin rows out-yielded the 30” rows by an average of 2.2 Bu./A. and equated to higher net returns of $12.88/A. Of the six hybrids tested in this study, only two hybrids (Phoenix 6948A3** and BECK 5509A3) failed to out-yield the 30” rows.

With the drought of 2012 causing high amounts of crop stress, higher yields with twin rows may have contributed to a quicker crop canopy. This faster canopy closure may have increased shading even during times of leaf wilting during the day, causing cooler temperatures on the soil surface and inside the crop canopy.


145

BECK’S 30" vs. Twin Rows Study - Continued


146


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - 2012Planted: Various Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: Various Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictRows: Six 30” rows 24 oz. Durango

Purpose: To evaluate different planting dates of BECK 6175AMX™* and Phoenix 5385A3** during March, April, May and June. This enables us to analyze how planting dates affect corn yield on an annual basis, as well as multi-year averages.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

Planting Date BrandTest†

WeightPercentMositure

Bushels†

Per Acre3rd Week March Phoenix 5385A3** 58.6 15.5 141.93rd Week March BECK 6175AMX™* 60.3 16.0 143.7

AVERAGE 59.5 15.8 142.84th Week March Phoenix 5385A3** 56.6 15.2 156.74th Week March BECK 6175AMX™* 58.4 16.3 153.7

AVERAGE 57.5 15.8 155.22nd Week April Phoenix 5385A3** 57.3 16.2 170.92nd Week April BECK 6175AMX™* 59.4 19.1 172.5

AVERAGE 58.4 17.7 171.74th Week April Phoenix 5385A3** 59.7 21.5 156.94th Week April BECK 6175AMX™* 61.4 21.2 162.1

AVERAGE 60.6 21.4 159.52nd Week May Phoenix 5385A3** 59.3 24.0 148.62nd Week May BECK 6175AMX™* 59.3 23.2 174.9

AVERAGE 59.3 23.6 161.83rd Week May Phoenix 5385A3** 59.7 24.3 185.83rd Week May BECK 6175AMX™* 60.2 25.5 176.4

AVERAGE 60.0 24.9 181.14th Week May Phoenix 5385A3** 60.8 27.1 179.64th Week May BECK 6175AMX™* 58.9 27.2 170.3

AVERAGE 59.9 27.2 175.02nd Week June Phoenix 5385A3** 59.4 28.5 156.62nd Week June BECK 6175AMX™* 58.6 29.0 144.4

AVERAGE 59.0 28.8 150.5

Summary: This year the highest yields came from the 3rd week of May. Figure 1 illustrates the yield results of the 2012 spring planting dates. It also includes a timeline of the significant weather events that occurred.

Frost damage lowered final stands in March with nearly 40% reductions. The 2nd week of April plantings escaped the early frost events and flowered before the 100+ temperatures occurred. The 4th week of April and 1st week of May spent its pollination period during intense heat and dry conditions. Temperatures cooled a bit and we caught a few rains to really benefit the 3rd and 4th week plantings in May.

Figure 2 explains the multi-year relationship of yield to planting date by depicting the optimum corn planting date over the past 7 years being April 17th - 29th.


147

BECK’S Corn Planting Date Study - Continued

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

210

220

3/26 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 4/30 5/7 5/14 5/21 5/28 6/4 6/11

Yiel

d / A

cre

Planting Date

CILPFR 7 Year Corn Yield by Plan4ng Date Figure 2.

140

150

160

170

180

190

Yiel

d / A

cre

Planting Date

2012 Corn Planting Date Yield Frost Damage Pollinated Before Heat Sweltering Heat/Drought Cooler Temps/Rain

Figure 1.


148


Total 12.99 in.

Planting DatePlanted


Bushels†

Per AcreReplant

AdvantageNet^

Return3rd Week March 20,000 15.5 118.72nd Week April (Replanted) 36,000 17.7 171.7 +53.0 +$271.83

4th Week March 20,000 18.8 131.02nd Week April (Replanted) 36,000 17.7 171.7 +40.7 +$200.56

2nd Week April 20,000 18.8 127.24th Week April (Replanted) 36,000 22.6 156.9 +29.7 +$126.67

4th Week April 20,000 20.8 135.92nd Week May (Replanted) 36,000 22.6 161.8 +25.9 +$103.62

2nd Week May 20,000 24.1 143.04th Week May (Replanted) 36,000 27.2 175.0 +32.0 +$130.26

3rd Week May 20,000 23.0 163.72nd Week June (Replanted) 36,000 28.8 150.5 -13.2 -$132.95

4th Week May 20,000 27.3 158.62nd Week June (Replanted) 36,000 28.8 150.5 -8.1 -$76.49

BECK’S Corn Replant Study - 2012Planted: Various Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskHarvested: Various Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictPopulation: Various 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5385A3** &Previous Crop: Soybeans BECK 6175AMX™*

Purpose: To replant or not to replant…that is the question. This study’s purpose is to evaluate corn populations and determine whether or not it is profitable to replant. Replanting is a very emotional decision for growers and this study evaluates populations of corn at 20,000 versus 36,000 at various planting dates to show if replanting would have paid off given the low final population and replant date. These results show an average of two corn hybrids planted at various dates throughout the spring planting season. Crop insurance replant option payments are not factored into any calculations.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $0.04/pt. drying and a replant cost of $25.00.

-$150 -$100

-$50 $0

$50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300

Ret

urn

on R

epla

nt

Replant Dates

5 Year Replant Economics: CILPFR 3rd Week March 4th Week March 1st Week April 2nd Week April 3rd Week April 4th Week April 1st Week May 2nd Week May 3rd Week May 4th Week May

Figure 1.

Summary: Replanting the low 20,000 population stands from original March plantings offered the highest benefits from replanting with average yield advantages of 46.9 Bu./A. This was attributed to a frost that occurred the first week of April that reduced final stands by 40%.

Replanting the low 20,000 population stands from original April plantings also offered yield advantages, however yield increases averaged 27.8 Bu./A. with net returns of $115.15/A.

May replanting only offered economic returns through the second week, which saw increased average yields of 32 Bu./A. After the second week of May, there was no economic benefit to replanting low 20,000 populations. May replants saw average replant yield losses of 10.7 Bu./A. with negative returns of $104.97.

Central Illinois PFR replant data suggests that replanting corn in April can reward a grower significantly if we have corn stands near or at 20,000 plants/A. However, once replant dates get into the month of May the success rate of replanting diminishes. Figure 1 (previous page) illustrates that the five year history of corn replanting at the Central Illinois PFR location has had positive net returns when the replanting occurred no later than the month of April. As replanting has been completed in May, leaving the low populations of 20,000 plants/A. has shown to offer higher returns and profits.

All factors of this replant trial are based on low corn populations of 20,000 plants/A. A grower must evaluate final corn stands to accurately know how much stands are reduced. If populations would drop below 20,000 plants/A., the advantages for replanting would increase significantly.


149

BECK’S Corn Replant Study - Continued

100% Replant Policy:If there is a need to replant a field of Beck's corn, soybeans, wheat or elite alfalfa, as determined by a Beck's representative, Beck's will furnish the seed and royalties FREE.


150


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Nitrogen Timing Studyon Continuous Corn - 2012

Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 5, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3Replications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

Return25 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 25 gal. @ V6 f/b 25 gal @ V14 Sidedress 18.4 173.5 +3.8 $1005.6538 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 37 gal. @ V10 Sidedress 18.3 172.9 +3.2 $1011.1130 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 10 gal. 2X2 f/b 35 gal. @ V4 Sidedress 18.3 172.1 +2.4 $1006.3938 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 37 gal. @ V4 Sidedress 18.4 171.1 +1.4 $1000.4940 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 35 gal. YDrop™ @ V10 Sidedress 18.3 170.6 +0.9 $997.5475 gal. Weed-N-Feed (control) 18.7 169.7 ---- $1001.2375 gal. @ V3 SideDress 18.8 165.6 -4.1 $968.0475 gal. @ V6 SideDress 18.7 164.8 -4.9 $963.3210 gal. 2X2 f/b 65 gal. @ V3 Sidedress 18.7 165.7 -4.0 $968.6340 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 105 lbs. Urea Broadcast @ V7 18.2 153.6 -12.0 $897.24

Purpose: To evaluate various nitrogen timings in a continuous corn rotation. Timings will consist of preplant, 2x2, urea and various sidedress programs using liquid UAN 28%. This study is designed to evaluate timing efficiency, nitrogen loss and yield. The control in this study is 100% Weed-N-Feed treatment which is 75 gallons of 28% applied in the spring and incorporated.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, Nitrogen $0.67/lb. and an application cost of $9.00.YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

25 gal. WNF f/b 25 gal. @ V6 f/b 25 gal @ V14 Sidedress

38 gal. WNF f/b 37 gal. @ V10 Sidedress

30 gal. WNF f/b 10 gal. 2X2 f/b 35 gal. @ V4 Sidedress

38 gal. WNF f/b 37 gal. @ V5 Sidedress

40 gal. WNF f/b 35 gal. YDrop @ V10

Sidedress

75 gal. WNF (control)

75 gal. @ V3 SideDress

75 gal. @ V6 SideDress

10 gal. 2X2 f/b 65 gal. @ V3 Sidedress

40 gal. WNF f/b 105 lbs. Urea Broadcast

Treatment & Return $4.42 $9.88 $5.16 -$0.74 -$3.69 -$33.19 -$37.91 -$32.60 -$103.99

-$110.00

-$90.00

-$70.00

-$50.00

-$30.00

-$10.00

$10.00

Loss

/ A

cre

2012 Nitrogen Timing on Continuous Corn: Net Return

Figure 1.

Summary: Figure 1 (previous page) reveals that 100% Weed-N-Feed control was within a $10/A. system cost compared to many of the nitrogen programs in this study. 2012 did not offer much rainfall, which led to minimal denitrification. Historically, we battle large rainfall events that cause nitrate loss and in recent years split applications of nitrogen have paid off to a large degree. The red bars in Figure 1 (previous page) indicate the nitrogen programs that offered negative net returns in comparison to the 100% Weed-N-Feed control. These programs consisted of either applying large nitrogen amounts after the V3 growth stage or broadcast urea applications. Due to the severe drought these nitrogen applications were not fully utilized and resulted in yield losses of 4 - 12 Bu./A with negative returns of $33.00 - $104.00/A.

This year we continued our research of late season nitrogen applications by way of a Miller high-clearance tractor and nitrogen tool bar (Photo 1 & 2). The V10 sidedress application would not be able to be applied with a typical drawbar type sidedress applicator due to height restrictions of the corn. The Miller unit is able to apply nitrogen to corn up to tassel heights and gives a much larger window of application for sidedressing. Our 2012 results of these late applications proved to increase yields by an average 3.2 Bu./A. over 100% Weed-N-Feed (control) and equated to higher returns of $9.88/A. In addition, even with the drought conditions, the late V10 sidedress applications with the Miller unit increased yields by 0.8 Bu./A. over standard V4 sidedressing. This yield increase would equate to higher returns of $10.62/A. and suggests an advantage for sidedressing when corn reaches full canopy and is an active user of nitrogen. These later sidedress applications might offer a greater ability to “finish” nitrogen programs, increase yield potential and efficiency with nitrogen applications. More research needs to be done to fully analyze all of the benefits as well as disadvantages of nitrogen timing.

Another new addition to our nitrogen timing study this year was YDrop™. YDrop is a new drop system that can be installed on almost any spray machine and has the ability to precisely place liquid product within 2" - 3" of a crop row. Its unique design allows application of liquid products within the row at anytime throughout the season. We used YDrops to place 28% UAN near the base of the plant for more efficient nitrogen uptake. This year’s results indicated the YDrop’s yield was within 1 Bu. of the control and performed very similar to other sidedress type liquid applications. Photo 3 shows the YDrop application in progress during the nitrogen timing study at the Central Illinois PFR location.


151

BECK’S Nitrogen Timing Studyon Continuous Corn - Continued

Photo 1. Photo 2.

Photo 3.


152


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Nitrogen Timing Studyon Corn After Soybeans - 2012

Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: October 19, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3Replications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

Return20 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 20 gal. @ V6 f/b 20 gal. @ V14 Sidedress 20.0 216.8 +2.1 $1,261.1230 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 30 Gal V10 Sidedress 20.5 219.0 +4.3 $1,283.1020 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 10Gal 2X2 fb 30 Gal V4 Sidedress 20.3 217.5 +2.8 $1,274.2530 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 30 Gal V4 SideDress 20.7 218.2 +3.5 $1,278.3840 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 20 Gal YDrop™ at V10 Sidedress 20.1 217.8 +3.1 $1,276.0260 gal. Weed-N-Feed (Control) 20.0 214.7 ---- $1,266.7360 gal. @ V3 Sidedress 20.2 210.4 -4.3 $1,232.3660 gal. @ V6 Sidedress 20.3 204.7 -10.0 $1,198.7310 gal. 2X2 f/b 50 gal. @ V3 Sidedress 20.0 211.2 -3.5 $1,237.0840 gal. Weed-N-Feed f/b 60 lbs. Urea Broadcast @ V7 20.6 199.6 -10.8 $1,168.64

Purpose: To evaluate various nitrogen timings in a corn after soybean rotation. Timings will consist of preplant, 2x2, urea and various sidedress programs using liquid UAN 28%. This study is designed to evaluate timing efficiency, nitrogen loss and yield. The control in this study is the 100% Weed-N-Feed treatment which is 60 gallons of 28% applied in the spring and incorporated.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, Nitrogen $0.67/lb. and an application cost of $9.00.YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

20 gal. WNF f/b 20 gal. @ V6 f/b 20 gal.

@ V14 Sidedress

30 gal. WNF f/b 30 Gal V10 Sidedress

20 gal. WNF f/b 10Gal 2X2 fb 30 Gal

V4 Sidedress

30 gal. WNF f/b 30 Gal V4 SideDress

40 gal. WNF f/b 20 Gal YDrop at V10

Sidedress

60 gal. WNF (Control)

60 gal. @ V3 Sidedress

60 gal. @ V6 Sidedress

10 gal. 2X2 f/b 50 gal. @ V3 Sidedress

40 gal. WNF f/b 60 lbs. Urea Broadcast

Treatment & Return -$5.61 $16.37 $7.52 $11.65 $9.29 -$34.37 -$68.00 -$29.65 -$98.09

-$120.00

-$100.00

-$80.00

-$60.00

-$40.00

-$20.00

$0.00

$20.00

$40.00

Loss

/ A

cre

2012 Nitrogen Timing Study on Corn After Soybeans: Net Return

Control

Figure 1.

Summary: Figure 1 reveals that the 100% Weed-N-Feed control was within a $10/A. system cost compared to many of the nitrogen programs in this study. 2012 did not offer much rainfall, which led to minimal losses of nitrogen such as denitrification. In most years we have to battle large rainfall events that do cause nitrate loss and in these years, split applications of nitrogen have paid off in large degrees. The red bars in Figure 1 (previous page) indicate the nitrogen programs that offered negative net returns in comparison to the 100% Weed-N-Feed control. These programs consisted of either applying large nitrogen amounts after the V3 growth stage or broadcast urea applications. Due to the severe drought, these nitrogen applications were not fully utilized resulting in yield losses of 4 - 11 Bu./A. with negative net returns of $5.00 - $98.00/A.

This year we continued our research of late season nitrogen applications by way of a Miller high-clearance tractor and nitrogen tool bar (Figure 2). The V10 sidedress application would not be able to be applied with a typical drawbar type sidedress applicator due to height restrictions of the corn. The Miller unit is able to apply nitrogen to corn up to tassel heights and gives a much larger window of application for sidedressing. Our 2012 results of these later V10 applications proved to increase yields by an average 4.3 Bu./A. over the 100% Weed-N-Feed control and equated to higher returns of $16.37/A. The late V10 sidedress applications with the Miller unit increased yields by 0.8 Bu./A. over standard V4 sidedressing. This yield increase equated to higher returns of $4.72/A. and suggests an advantage for sidedressing when corn reaches full canopy and is an active user of nitrogen. These later sidedress applications might offer a greater ability to “finish” nitrogen programs, increase yield potential and more efficient nitrogen applications. More research needs to be done to fully analyze all of the advantages and disadvantages of this nitrogen program.


153

BECK’S Nitrogen Timing Studyon Corn After Soybeans - Continued

Figure 2. Miller Nitro 4365 with 40' nitrogen toolbar, Central Illinois PFR.


154


Total 12.99 in.

$800

$900

$1,000

$1,100

$1,200

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

4 Yr CAC: Economic Optimum N Rate

$0.50 / Lbs. N.

$0.60 / Lbs. N.

$0.70 / Lbs. N.


Bushels†

Per AcreCost of

NNet^

Return

Return on Additional Lbs. of N

CORN AFTER CORN250 19.4 168.4 $167.50 $826.06 -$22.65225 19.9 169.4 $150.75 $848.71 +$6.26200 19.0 165.5 $134.00 $842.45 +$107.74175 18.8 144.4 $117.25 $734.71 +$121.31150 18.3 121.0 $100.50 $613.40 +$195.65125 18.2 85.0 $83.75 $417.75 +$85.58 0 18.4 56.3 $0.00 $332.17 ----

AVERAGE 18.9 130.0

CORN AFTER SOYBEANS225 21.8 184.9 $150.75 $940.16 -$20.59200 20.7 185.6 $134.00 $960.75 -$9.67175 21.6 184.4 $117.25 $970.42 +$51.39150 21.0 172.8 $100.50 $919.02 +$50.22125 21.9 161.5 $83.75 $868.81 +$98.60100 20.5 141.9 $67.00 $770.21 +$231.54 0 18.9 91.3 $0.00 $538.67 ----

AVERAGE 20.9 135.1

BECK’S Nitrogen Rate Study - 2012Corn After Corn & Corn After Soybeans

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $5.90 corn and Nitrogen cost of $0.67/lb.

Planted: CAC: April 9, 2012 Replications: Two (averaged)CAB: April 8, 2012 Previous Crop: Corn / Soybean

Harvested: CAC: September 17, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskCAB: September 17, 2012 Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. Durango

Rows: Eight 30" rows Product Tested: CAC: BECK 6175AMX™*

Population: CAC: 34,500 seeds/A. CAB: BECK 5442VT3CAB: 35,000 seeds/A.

Purpose: This study was initially set up to help gather nitrogen data for a state-wide database coordinated by the University of Illinois. Seven nitrogen rates ranging from 0 - 250 lbs./A., were replicated to determine optimum economic rates of nitrogen in a CAC and CAB rotation. All nitrogen rates are applied in 50% preplant “weed-n-feed” and 50% sidedress applications with UAN 28% liquid nitrogen.

Figure 1.

Summary: Figure 1 (previous page) illustrates how 2012 nitrogen rates compare to the last 3 years of testing. This data would suggest that over the last 4 years, the economic nitrogen rate was 217 - 219 lbs./A., depending on the cost/lb. of nitrogen. Figure 2 reveals the 2012 economic optimum rate of 225 lbs./A. for continuous corn rotations. As nitrogen rates were increased over 225 lbs., it failed to increase yields and caused a negative return on investment. Figure 3 reveals that this year's economic nitrogen rate in a corn after soybean (CAB) rotation was established at the 175 lbs. nitrogen rate. As nitrogen rates were increased over 175 lbs., yields and returns were not able to be driven higher. Figure 4 shows the past 4 years of nitrogen rate data and it indicates that economic optimum nitrogen rates are 186 - 190 lbs./A., depending on the cost/lbs. of nitrogen.


155

$1,120 $1,130 $1,140 $1,150 $1,160 $1,170 $1,180 $1,190 $1,200 $1,210 $1,220 $1,230

150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225

Net

Ret

urn

Lbs. Nitrogen/Acre

4 Year CAB: Economic Optimum N Rate

$0.50 / Lbs. N.

$0.60 / Lbs. N.

$0.70 / Lbs. N.

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

$1,000

Dol

lars

Ret

urn/

Acr

e

Nitrogen Rate Applied

2012 CIL PFR CAB Economic N Rate

0#

100#

125#

150#

175#

200#

225#

BECK’S Nitrogen Rate Study - ContinuedCorn After Corn & Corn After Soybeans

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

Dol

lars

Ret

urn/

Acr

e

Nitrogen Rate Applied

2012 CIL PFR CAC Economic N Rate

0# 125# 150# 175# 200# 225# 250#

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 2.


156


Total 12.99 in.

Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 24, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Twelve 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Net^Return

Adv. of Application

Control 58.7 21.0 219.9 ---- $1,297.41 $1,297.41 ----Nutrisphere-N® 0.5%/100 gal. 58.7 21.1 233.8 +13.9 $1,379.42 $1,361.15 +$63.74Agrotain Plus® 4 lbs./ton 58.7 21.0 233.4 +13.5 $1,377.06 $1,357.80 +$60.39Instinct™ 35 oz./A 58.5 20.5 233.8 +13.9 $1,379.42 $1,368.76 +$71.351/2 Rate Instinct 17.5 oz. + 58.6 20.7 232.9 +13.0 $1,374.11 $1,358.58 +$61.17 Factor 1.5 qts./tonFactor 1.5 qts./ton 58.3 20.0 227.5 +7.6 $1,342.25 $1,332.05 +$34.64NutriSphere 18 oz./A. (experimental rate) 58.5 20.4 226.0 +6.1 $1,333.40 $1,324.82 +$27.41

AVERAGE 58.6 20.7 229.6 +11.3 $1,354.72 $1,342.94 +$53.12†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90 corn, Nutrisphere-N $61.00/gal., Agrotain Plus $4.00/lb., Instinct $39.00/gal. and Factor $84.50/gal.Nutrisphere-N is a registered trademark of SFP. Agrotain Plus is a registered trademark of Agrotain International LLC. Instinct is a trademark of Dow

AgroSciences. Factor is a registered trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc.

Purpose: Each year many corn growers apply UAN liquid nitrogen in the spring as a part of their nitrogen program. This nitrogen stabilizer study evaluates four products that have the ability to reduce nitrogen losses that can occur from lack of incorporation, dry weather, or high velocity winds. Sixty gallons of 28% was applied preplant incorporated in this study.

Nutrisphere-N® from Specialty Fertilizer Products prevents and reduces volatilization and denitrification of liquid nitrogen fertilizers. Nutrisphere-N controls urease, keeping it from robbing nitrogen and yield potential. Nutrisphere-N protects nitrogen in its ammonium state before it gets converted, giving a greater return on your nitrogen fertilizer investment.

Agrotain® Plus from Agrotain International, also blocks the activity of the naturally occurring enzyme called urease, protecting against volatility losses. Agrotain Plus is a stabilizing agent which keeps nitrogen in the ammonium form for a longer period of time and reduces volatilization, denitrification, and leaching losses.

Instinct™ is a nitrogen stabilizer that contains the active ingredient nitripyrin, the same ingredient as N-Serve. Instinct is a nitrogen stabilizer for liquid UAN solutions and works to ensure that nitrogen is stablilized in the ammonium form, which is less susceptible to losses from leaching and denitrification. Instinct keeps the soil-dwelling Nitrosomonas bacteria inactive, as this bacterium will attack ammonium and convert it to nitrates which are then prone to losses. Instinct does not protect against volatilization losses.

Factor® is a urease inhibitor for UAN and Urea and delays the hydrolysis of urea which is catalyzed by urease. Factor only offers volatilization protection.

BECK’S Nitrogen Stabilizer Study - 2012

Figure 1. Figure 2.

$- $5.00

$10.00 $15.00 $20.00 $25.00 $30.00 $35.00 $40.00 $45.00 $50.00

Nitrogen Stabilizer

Net

Pro

fit /

Acr

e

3 Year Nitrogen Stabilizer Return

Nutrisphere-N

Agrotain Plus

CILPFR, 2010-2012

+$40.93/A. Avg.

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

Nitrogen Stabilizer

Avg

Yiel

d G

ain

/ Acr

e

3 Year Nitrogen Stabilizer Yield

Nutrisphere-N

Agrotain Plus

CILPFR, 2010-2012

+11.6 Bu. Avg.

Summary: All nitrogen stabilizers tested in this study proved to offer yield gains over the untreated control. Yield gains varied from 6.1 - 13.9 Bu./A. with increased net returns of $27.41 - $71.35/A.

Factor® only provided yield gains of 7.6 Bu./A, however it only provides protection from volatilization. This is interesting, as we might be able to assume some yield contributions between volatilization and dentrification. All of the dual mode of action stabilizers offered yield gains of near 14 Bu./A, which might lead us to believe that the volatilization efforts could have been near 50% of the yield gains. More research needs to be done to truly compare the differences.

Figure 1 (previous page) illustrates the three year average yield gain of 11.6 Bu./A., comparing Nutrisphere-N and Agrotain Plus stabilizers at the CILPFR location, while Figure 2 (previous page) reveals the average net returns.


157

BECK’S Nitrogen Stabilizer Study - Continued


158


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Late Season Nitrogen Application - 2012Planted: April 24, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 15, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 6175AMX™*


Nitrogen TreatmentPercentMoisture

Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.



Control: V4 Sidedress Knife Injection with pull behind row crop sidedresser 18.1 60.4 119.8 ---- $706.82 ----

V10 Knife Injection with Hagie STS 10 18.0 60.5 120.7 +0.9 $712.13 +$5.31V10 High Pressure Injection with Miller Nitro 18.0 60.5 122.4 +2.6 $722.16 +$15.34

V10 YDrop™ with New Holland SP275F 18.2 60.5 114.9 -4.9 $677.91 -$28.91V10 Dribble with New Holland SP275F 18.2 60.6 102.3 -17.5 $603.57 -$103.25

AVERAGE 18.1 60.5 119.5†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn.YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

Purpose: In this study we compared four different types of late season nitrogen application methods to a typical early season V4 sidedress. All treatments used UAN 28% and received 25 gallons preplant incorporated and 26 gallons as a late season sidedress. All sidedress applications included a nitrogen stabilizer to help control volatilization. The treatments were as follows:

1. Pull behind row crop sidedress unit with knives at V4, used as control in this study 2. Hagie STS 10 with nitrogen tool-bar equipped with knives at V10 3. Miller Nitro with nitrogen tool-bar equipped with high pressure injection at V10 4. New Holland SP275F equipped with YDrops™ at V10 5. New Holland SP275F equipped with classic dribble drops at V10

Miller Nitro with high pressure injection. Hagie STS with knives.

Summary: If we would have only received some nice rains during the growing season, this would have been a really interesting study. However, drought conditions plagued this plot and sidedress applications did not have much of a chance to flourish.

The dry and warm conditions wreaked havoc on the dribble application, even with a nitrogen stabilizer applied dribble treatments lost 11.2 Bu./A. and -$66.05/A. compared to the control. This yield decrease was more than likely attributed to volatilization, one of the problems we typically see with dribble type applications.

The YDrop™ precision placement yielded 4.9 Bu./A. less than the control with net losses of -$28.91/A., but it was interesting to see that it did perform much better than the classic dribble in the middle of the row. YDrops place the liquid product 2 - 3 inches from the crop row. This 2 - 3 inches could be classified as the “wet zone”. As even small rains or heavy dew occur, rainfall is funneled down the plant to the soil surface, exactly where the YDrop is waiting for it. This placement also allows for more shading since its out of the middle of the row.

The Hagie STS 10 equipped with a nitrogen toolbar with knife placement did a nice job applying nitrogen to growth stage V10 corn. The toolbar equipped with knife injection, did a superb job of getting the nitrogen buried and covered during sidedressing. I do think it ended up suffering from the knife trench opening up and drying out the soil more and even exposing corn roots to light and increased temperatures. This treatment yielded within 1.0 Bu./A. of the control and offered increased returns over the control by $5.31.

The Miller Nitro with high pressure injection on its nitrogen toolbar did a great job sidedressing and placing nitrogen product 4 - 5 inches deep in the soil. The Clymer coulter/injection system also performed well in covering the nitrogen in the soil. This sidedress treatment out-yielded the control by 2.6 Bu./A. and observed higher net returns of $15.34/A.

In summary, late season sidedressing in 2012 did not offer huge advantages like it normally does, due to the lack of rainfall, slow growing conditions, overall low yields and minimal amounts (if any) of denitrification. It was interesting to see in a year like 2012 how these treatments performed. One take home message that we learned with this study involves the Hagie and Miller sidedress treatments. These sidedress applications in the past have offered growers the ability to manage nitrate loss and eliminate decreased yields in years where denitrification was a concern. These applications in 2012 still managed to yield within a 1.75 Bu./A. average of the control. This should help growers in knowing that this sidedress system is very effective when combined with a solid agronomic nitrogen program, and offers significant potential of higher yields and net returns over time.

Each year is a learning opportunity for us and 2012 is no different. We hope to continue this study in the future and I’m sure it will be very interesting to see the yield results as the growing seasons change each year.


159

BECK’S Late Season Nitrogen Application - Continued

New Holland with classic dribble drops. YDrop precision sidedress placement.


160


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S N-Serve® Study - 2012Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. VerdictRows: Six 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: Phoenix 5642A4**


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


Control: 180 lbs. Nitrogen NH3 19.2 126.7 ---- $747.53 ----1 qt. N-Serve® & 180 lbs. Nitrogen NH3 18.0 138.3 +11.7 $804.97 +$57.44

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $11.00/A. cost of N-Serve.N-Serve is a registered trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC.

Purpose: N-Serve® contains the active ingredient nitrapyrin. Because of the economic value of applied nitrogen, it's in our best interest to manage our nitrogen investment for the best possible return. The key to effective nitrogen management is to keep applied nitrogen in the ammonium form. N-Serve® nitrogen stabilizer converts regular, unstabilized applied N to stabilized nitrogen. Stabilized nitrogen is a premium nitrogen fertilizer because it enhances crop performance and provides the best overall return on investment per pound of N applied. Stabilizing your nitrogen investment promotes crop profitability and responsible stewardship of the environment. An oil-soluble product, N-Serve may be used with anhydrous ammonia, dry ammonium and urea fertilizers.

Summary: For the 2012 growing season N-Serve® applications offered a 11.7 Bu./A. yield increase over stand-alone NH3 treatments. This yield benefit equated to a $57.44/A. return on investment. 2 year data suggests an average yield increase of 10.75 Bu./A. which equates to an average return on investment of $52.62. This study evaluates the use of 100% of nitrogen applied in a fall application. In these high rate fall nitrogen scenarios, N-Serve is a sound agronomic investment.

148 150 152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166

Control N-Serve

154.5

165.25

Yiel

d/A

.

Treatment

2011 - 2012 N-Serve Data 10.75 Bu./A. Advantage


161


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Starter Fertilizer Study on Corn - 2012Planted: April 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 24, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 6179VT3Replications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageIN-FURROW Control 18.0 158.1 ---- $932.79 ----2 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 17.6 166.3 +8.2 $975.17 +$42.383 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 17.6 166.1 +8.0 $970.99 +$38.205 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 18.1 171.0 +12.9 $993.90 +$61.117 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 18.0 169.0 +10.9 $976.10 +$43.31

AVERAGE 10.0 +$46.25

2X2Control 18.1 154.0 ---- $908.60 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 2X2 17.7 162.0 +8.0 $940.80 +$32.2010 gal. 7-22-5 2X2 17.6 164.8 +10.8 $942.32 +$33.7215 gal. 7-22-5 2X2 17.4 157.8 +3.8 $886.02 -$22.58

AVERAGE +8.1 +$17.79

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn and the cost of 7-22-5 at $3.00/gal.

Purpose: To evaluate the use of 7-22-5 liquid starter fertilizer in both in-furrow and 2x2 applications. The 7-22-5 is a liquid poly phosphate starter fertilizer for use in corn to stimulate early seedling growth. It is a 100% water-soluble liquid starter fertilizer for maximum nutrient availability. In-furrow applications are made via seed firmers and 2x2 applications are made by using starter attachments ahead of the planter row units. These starter attachments apply fertilizer two inches away from the seed and two inches below the seed. Rates of starter will be varied to try to analyze the optimum rate per acre in both in furrow and 2x2 starter applications.

Summary: The cool April we endured at Central Illinois PFR made for excellent starter fertilizer trials this year. Both in-furrow and 2x2 treatments offered yield advantages, as well as positive net returns. Part of the issue with starter fertilizer is knowing how many gal./A. of product to apply and in what application format. In-furrow applications showed the best results at 5 gal./A., realizing a 12.9 Bu./A. advantage with net returns of $61.11/A. 2x2 starter applications proved to offer highest yields at 10 gal./A., but due to the higher cost of product net returns finished at $33.72/A.


162


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S YDrop™ Fertilizer / Insecticide Study - 2012Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 23, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Insecticide: Capture® LFR®

Rows: Six 30” rows Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictReplications: Three (averaged) 24 oz. Durango


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceTreatment

CostNet^


Phoenix 5552A4**

Control 18.5 100.9 ---- ---- $595.31 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop™ @ V10 18.6 109.4 +8.5 $35.50 $609.96 $14.658.5 oz. Capture® LFR® YDrop @ V10 18.5 103.6 +2.7 $25.50 $585.74 -$9.57BECK 6175AMX™*

Control 18.4 95.9 ---- ---- $565.81 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop @ V10 18.4 102.9 +7.0 $35.50 $571.61 $5.808.5 oz. Capture LFR YDrop @ V10 18.4 106.2 +10.3 $25.50 $601.08 $35.27BECK 5442vT3Control 17.3 100.1 ---- ---- $590.59 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop @ V10 17.4 106.2 +6.1 $35.50 $591.08 $0.498.5 oz. Capture LFR YDrop @ V10 17.7 117.2 +17.1 $25.50 $665.98 $75.39Phoenix 5385A3**

Control 18.0 92.5 ---- ---- $545.75 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop @ V10 18.2 98.5 +6.0 $35.50 $545.65 -$0.108.5 oz. Capture LFR YDrop @ V10 18.3 101.5 +9.0 $25.50 $573.35 $27.60AvERAGEControl 18.1 97.4 ---- ---- $574.37 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop @ V10 18.2 104.3 +6.9 $35.50 $579.58 $5.218.5 oz. Capture LFR YDrop @ V10 18.2 107.1 +9.8 $25.50 $606.54 $32.17

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, Capture LFR $19.50/A., 7-22-5 $3.00/gal., 0-0-14 $1.45/gal. and a $6.00 application cost.Capture LFR is a registered trademark of FMC Corporation. YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

Purpose: This study is designed to evaluate a new liquid drop system called the YDrop™. YDrop is a versatile system that can be installed on almost any spray machine and has the ability to precisely place any liquid product within 2 - 3 inches of a crop row. Its unique design allows liquid products to be applied within the row at anytime throughout the season. In this study, we installed the YDrop on a New Holland SP275F high clearance sprayer and evaluated applications of 7-22-5 and 0-0-14 liquid fertilizers, as well as Capture® LFR® insecticide. The goal of this study is to evaluate the yield effects of placing liquid fertilizer or insecticide 2 - 3 inches from the corn row during the season at the V10 growth stage. 7-22-5 is a liquid poly phosphate starter fertilizer for use in corn and the 0-0-14 is liquid muriate of potash used to assist plant development and increase management of moisture in dry soil conditions.

Capture® LFR® contains the active ingredient Bifenthrin and is classified as a non-systemic pyrethroid that controls corn rootworm, cutworms, wireworms and grubs. This application of insecticide is off-label and is only being demonstrated for research purposes. Capture LFR is labeled for use as a liquid at-plant insecticide, however we are analyzing the use of this insecticide via YDrop applications at a later date to help increase pest control at the base of the plant.

Summary: YDrop™ applications of 7-22-5 and 0-0-14 offered average yield gains of 6.9 Bu./A. with net returns of just over $5.00/A. The YDrop’s ability to precisely place fertilizer at the base of the corn plant allowed for fast and easy uptake of nutrients. Even though the drought of 2012 limited rainfall amounts to only 0.9 inches in June, the YDrop was able to place fertilizer in the “wet zone”, or the area near the base of the plant where rainfall or dew can be “funneled” down the plant. This allowed for higher amounts of soil moisture to aid in fertilizer uptake.

Even better results were seen with Capture® LFR® insecticide applications with the YDrop. 8.5 oz./A. of Capture LFR increased corn yields by an average of 9.8 Bu./A. with a return on investment of $32.17/A. It is unclear why we received these higher corn yields from a non-systemic insecticide, but we look forward to conducting more research with YDrops in the future to determine the true benefits of this liquid drop system.


163

BECK’S YDrop™ Fertilizer / Insecticide Study - Continued

YDrop precision sidedress placement. New Holland SP275F.

YDrop system allows liquid product placement within 2 - 3 inches of a crop row.


164


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soil Applied Insecticide Study - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $16.00/A. Counter® 15GCounter® 15G is a registered trademark of AmVac Chemical Company Corporation.

Planted: May 15, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: October 10, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskRows: Four 30” rows Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A.Replications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: This study is designed to evaluate various Beck’s corn hybrids with different specific rootworm events. It is our intention to analyze any beneficial effects of a soil applied insecticide applied in a T-band at planting. Counter® 15G is an insecticide and nematicide containing the active ingredient Terbufos, and is labeled for control of corn rootworm larvae, wireworms, white grubs, and seed corn maggots. Counter® 15G also is labeled for control of lance, lesion, spiral, stunt, sting, stubby root and dagger nematodes.

Summary: Counter 15G offered average overall yield gains of 3.12 Bu./A. and net returns of $2.39/A. The real story in this study resides in the average net return advantage of the corn hybrids with the Cry3Bb1 rootworm protein trait. These two hybrids (BECK 6179VT3 and 5442VT3) showed the highest yield response from a soil applied insecticide with net returns near $22.00 - 26.00/A.

All other corn hybrids with alternative rootworm trait proteins, (MIR604 and Cry34/35) showed negative net returns from a soil applied insecticide. This data suggests that we could be seeing the results of corn rootworm resistance in our area involving the Cry3Bb1 protein.

BrandRootworm

Trait TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


Phoenix 5552A4** MIR604 Control 26.1 235.3 ---- $1,388.27 ----Phoenix 5552A4** MIR604 8.7# Counter® 15G 26.2 235.8 0.5 $1,375.22 -$13.05

Phoenix 5726A4** MIR604 Control 28.3 192.3 ---- $1,134.57 ----Phoenix 5726A4** MIR604 8.7# Counter® 15G 28.2 194.1 1.8 $1,129.19 -$5.38

BECK 5269HXR™* Cry34/35 Control 24.2 207.3 ---- $1,223.07 ----BECK 5269HXR™* Cry34/35 8.7# Counter® 15G 24.5 210.0 2.7 $1,223.00 -$0.07

BECK 6175AMX™* Cry34/35 Control 24.7 215.4 ---- $1,270.86 ----BECK 6175AMX™* Cry34/35 8.7# Counter® 15G 24.9 215.4 0.0 $1,254.86 -16.00

BECK 5442VT3 Cry3Bb1 Control 26.1 214.5 ---- $1,265.55 ----BECK 5442VT3 Cry3Bb1 8.7# Counter® 15G 25.9 221.6 7.1 $1,291.44 +$25.89

BECK 6179VT3 Cry3Bb1 Control 24.4 207.4 ---- $1,223.66 ----BECK 6179VT3 Cry3Bb1 8.7# Counter® 15G 24.2 214.0 6.6 $1,246.60 +$22.94


165


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S AirForce™ Study - 2012Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 28, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5244VT3Replications: Four (averaged)

Down PressureBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.Loss

GrossReturn

$/A.^ Loss

AirForce™ Variable Rate 192.1 ---- $1,133.39 ----0 lb. 174.0 -18.1 $1,026.60 -$106.79125 lbs. 185.9 -6.2 $1,096.81 -$36.58250 lbs. 193.0 +0.9 $1,138.70 +$5.31375 lbs. 192.4 +0.3 $1,135.16 +$1.77

AVERAGE 187.5 -5.8 $1,106.13 -$34.10†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture. ^$/A. Loss based on $5.90/Bu. corn. AirForce is a trademark of Precision Planting.

Purpose: Beck’s Central Illinois PFR teamed up with Precision Planting® and its 20/20 AirForce™ system to conduct this automatic down force adjustment trial. Down force adjustments allow the amount of weight on a planter row unit to maintain constant ground contact and planting depth. If we set our planter row units for too much down force pressure, we can produce sidewall compaction, uneven emergence, and poor root development. Conversely, too little down force pressure leads to shallow planting depth. In both cases, yield loss occurs. Setting the amount of down force pressure depends on planting conditions and planting speed. Most planters have either a spring tension device or air bags on the planter row units. These can be adjusted manually by increasing or decreasing air pressure or by adjusting the amount of spring tension. In both cases, these are manual adjustments that have to be made on a field by field basis. Determining the amount of down force can be difficult because of varying soil types, tillage conditions, soil moisture, and seed quantity in boxes.

Precision Planting’s 20/20 SeedSense™ system can measure ground contact and the total row unit weight to make automatic adjustments needed to maintain ideal down force regardless of planting conditions, while maintaining the ground contact that assures uniform seeding depth.

Summary: AirForce performance this year was dramatically different than past years results. Due to this year’s dry planting conditions, a higher amount of downforce was needed to maintain consistent ground contact and planting depth. In past years, as Figure 1 indicates, 125 lbs. of planter unit downforce has traditionally been the correct downforce setting on the planter. However, the dry soil conditions at planting made it necessary to increase downforce. As downforce was lowered to 0 lbs. and 125 lbs. per planter unit, yields were decreased by 6.2 - 18.1 Bu./A. respectively in comparison to the variable rate AirForce. These yield losses equated to negative returns of $36.58 - $106.79/A. Downforce levels of 250 lbs. and 375 lbs. offered yield levels within less than 1 Bu./A. of the variable rate AirForce.

200

205

210

215

220

225

Yiel

d / A

cre

Down Force Setting

CILPFR AirForce™ Multi-Year Data 2009 - 2012

AirForce 0# 125# 250# 375#

Figure 1.


166


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Drought Tolerant Trait Study on Agrisure Artesian™ and AQUAmax™ - 2012

Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 20, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rowsReplications: Two (averaged)

BrandDrought

Tolerant TraitPercentMoisture

Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

Return

Percent Yield

Increase

BECK 5269HXR™* ---- 21.5 58.6 124.5 $734.55

Phoenix 5832A3** 24.5 60.0 138.4 13.9 $816.56 11.2

BECK 5475AMX™* 21.9 59.0 141.0 16.5 $831.90 13.3

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn.Agrisure Artesian is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. AQUAmax is a trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Purpose: To evaluate two native drought tolerant products: Agrisure Artesian™ and Optimum AQUAmax™.

Summary: Under severe drought conditions at the Central Illinois PFR farm, both drought tolerant hybrids offered yield gains in comparison to the non-drought tolerant hybrid in this study. Yield gains were seen from 13.9 to 16.5 Bu./A. The AQUAmax™ hybrid delivered 13.3% yield gains, while the Artesian™ hybrid delivered +11.2%. In the future, we hope that these platforms can offer yield stability in years of inconsistant rainfall or in fields with variable soil types and lower water holding capacities.

While the drought tolerant products performed well in this study, keep in mind all three of these hybrids have different base genetics.


167


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Specialty Corn Show Plot - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Gross return based on $5.90/Bu. corn with the addition of $0.70 premium for waxy corn, $1.00 premium for white corn and $0.25 premium for food grade corn.

Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskRows: Four 30” rows Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A.Replications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: To evaluate Beck’s specialty corn products consisting of food grade, waxy and white traits. One food grade, two waxy hybrids and three white corn hybrids were compared to non-specialty hybrids in Beck’s corn lineup.

White corn is used primarily in alkaline cooking for tortillas and tortilla chips. A pale, white color is important as well as having a hard endosperm similar to yellow food grade hybrids. Premiums vary, but are typically near $1.00/Bu.

Waxy corn is primarily grown for wet millers, as its starch properties are useful for processed food and industrial products. In waxy dent corn, the starch portion of the endosperm is composed of only amylopectin. Regular yellow dent is 75% amylopectin and 25% amylose. Waxy corn is used for feeding rations, as waxy corn has 40 times the glucose than amylose in regular yellow dent corn. Premiums for waxy corn range near $0.70/Bu.

Food grade corn is hard endosperm and used for value-added processing that separates corn mechanically, producing meal and flour. Food products such as cereals, baking mixes and snacks are made from food grade corn. Premiums for food grade corn range near $0.25/Bu.

Summary: This study shows that Beck’s corn hybrids have yield, yield, yield in various platforms! Phoenix 6442A4** and Phoenix 5642A4** were used in this study as non-specialty type hybrids to compare the yields and net return abilities of white, waxy and food grade corn.

Specialty Product BrandPercentMoisture

TestWeight

Bushels†

Per AcreGross^Return

---- Phoenix 6442A4** 23.2 55.5 226.8 $1,338.12Food Grade BECK EX 0219 (6543 Genetics)™* 20.5 57.8 215.0 $1,322.25White BECK EX 0283 26.3 60.6 185.6 $1,280.64---- Phoenix 5642A4** 24.0 55.9 215.6 $1,272.04Waxy BECK 5435wx™* 20.3 58.4 185.0 $1,221.00Waxy BECK 6187wx™* 20.5 59.2 179.9 $1,187.34White BECK EX 0284 23.1 59.3 161.6 $1,115.04White BECK EX 0282 22.1 58.8 149.9 $1,034.31

AVERAGE 22.5 58.2 189.9 $1,214.60


168


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Crop Rotation & Tillage Study - 2012Planted: BAC: May 18, 2012 Previous Crop: Various

CAB & CAC: May 6, 2012 Tillage: VariousHarvested: October 22, 2012 Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoPopulation: BAC: 175,000 seeds/A. Product Tested: Phoenix 5385A3**

CAB & CAC: 34,500 seeds/A. BECK 289NR™*

Rows: Twelve twin rowsReplications: Two (averaged)

TillagePercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre Cost^^Net^

ReturnReturn onInvestment

CORN AFTER SOYBEANSConventional-Till 23.8 165.7 $37.00 $940.63 ----Strip-Till 23.9 163.7 $42.20 $923.63 -$17.00Vertical Till 23.9 159.2 $47.90 $891.38 -$63.75No-Till 24.3 153.9 $25.30 $882.71 -$72.42

AVERAGE 24.0 160.6

CONTINUOUS CORNConventional-Till 27.0 138.4 $46.80 $769.76 ----Strip-Till 28.1 120.5 $42.20 $668.75 -$101.21Vertical Till 27.4 102.2 $47.90 $555.08 -$214.88No-Till 26.6 93.9 $25.30 $528.71 -$241.25

AVERAGE 27.3 113.8

SOYBEANS AFTER CORNConventional-Till 11.0 65.9 $37.00 $832.88 ----Strip-Till 10.9 61.9 $42.20 $774.88 -$48.20Vertical Till 10.9 62.6 $47.90 $778.42 -$54.46No-Till 10.9 60.6 $25.30 $774.62 -$48.46

AVERAGE 10.9 62.8†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture for corn and 13% moisture for soybeans.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company. ^Net return based on gross return minus cost of tillage, planting, and burn-down herbicide pass. ^^Cost for tillage, planting, and burn down herbicide pass were taken from the results of the 2012 University of Illinois Machinery Cost Estimates: Field

Operations Guide.CAB Conventional-Till: A primary tillage pass in the fall followed by one pass with a field cultivator in the spring, conventional-till planter. CAC Conventional: A

primary tillage pass in the fall followed by two passes with a field cultivator in the spring, conventional-till planter. BAC Conventional-Till: A primary tillage pass in the fall followed by one pass with a field cultivator in the spring, conventional-till planter.

Strip-Till: Extra burn-down pass, strip-till bar and no-till planter with attachments. Vertical-Till: Extra burn-down pass, one pass with a vertical tillage implement in the fall and spring, conventional-till planter. No-till: Extra burn-down pass, no till planter with attachments

Purpose: To evaluate different forms of tillage in both first year and continuous corn rotations. Tillage methods include no-till, strip-till, vertical-till, and conventional-till. Conventional-till consists of a disk chisel plow in the fall, fall strip-till is completed with a Remlinger strip-till tool bar, vertical-till is a McFarlane Reel Disk in the spring and fall, while no-till consists of a Great Plains planter equipped with no-till coulters and residue cleaners. For this study both the corn and soybeans have been planted to twin rows.

Summary: 2012 Corn: In the first year corn rotations, all tillage programs averaged 160.6 Bu./A. with conventional-tillage earning the highest yields at 165.7 Bu./A. Strip-till and vertical-till compared similarly with yields at 163.7 and 159.2 Bu./A. No-till offered the lowest yields of 153.9 Bu./A. Yields only varied 11.8 Bu./A. between the four tillage systems.

In continuous corn rotations, all tillage programs averaged 113.8 Bu./A. This is a -46.8 Bu./A. yield loss compared to first year corn rotations. Conventional-tillage offered the highest yields at 138.4 Bu./A. As the amount of tillage decreased, so did yields. Strip-till was 17.9 Bu./A. less than conventional-tillage, vertical-till was 36.2 Bu./A. less, and no-till was 44.5 Bu./A. less.

2012 Soybeans: The same trend continued, where conventional-tillage offered highest yields of 65.9 Bu./A. As the amount of tillage decreased, so did yields. Vertical-till yielded 3.3 Bu./A. less than conventional-tillage, strip-till was 4.0 Bu./A. less, no-till was 5.3 Bu./A. less. These yield differences were primarily due to very dry spring planting conditions. Conventional-tillage allowed for consistent planting depth and more uniform emergence.

Multi-Year Summary: At Central Illinois PFR we have been conducting this study over the past 4 years. Figure 1 illustrates the difference in net return in no-till and strip tillage systems, compared to the control of the conventional-tillage system, in both continuous and first year corn rotations. With first year corn, strip-till has performed within $1.44/A. of a conventional-tillage system, while no-till returned -$44.79/A. In continuous corn rotations, the advantages for conventional-tillage systems has been much more significant. Strip-till continuous corn (CAC) has offered net returns of -$108.38/A., and no-till CAC returned -$248.42/A. These net return differences indicate that conventional-tillage has been needed for CAC rotations, due to higher carbon loads and carbon penalties.

2009 - 2012 soybean tillage system data in Figure 2 reveals the same trends. No-till soybeans have returns of -$12.72/A. and strip till -$25.99/A. compared to conventional-tillage systems. This data consists of 4 crop seasons and more data is needed to truly analyze the differences in net returns of these tillage systems.


169

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

BECK’S Crop Rotation & Tillage Study - Continued

$745.00

$750.00

$755.00

$760.00

$765.00

$770.00

$775.00

$780.00

$785.00

$Net

Ret

urn/

A.

2009 - 2012 Soybean Tillage Systems Net Return

Conventional

No-Till

Strip Till

-$12.72

-$25.99

$400.00

$500.00

$600.00

$700.00

$800.00

$900.00

$1,000.00

$1,100.00

Conven&onal No-‐&ll Strip-‐&ll

Net

Ret

urn

Tillage

2009-2012 Corn Tillage Systems Net Return

Corn after Corn

Corn After Beans

+$1.44

-$44.79

-$248.42

-$108.38


170


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Corn After Cover Crop Study - 2012Planted: April 10, 2012 Previous Crop: Cover CropHarvested: September 17, 2012 Tillage: Fall Cover Crop / Spring Vertical TillagePopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 4530HXR™*


Treatment

Cover CropCost

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

+/-$ +/- N

ReductionNet^

Return$ +/-

CheckN-vest® Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass $16.00100% 16.4 154.1 $772.59 +$94.9275% 16.4 152.3 -1.8 +$19.53 $792.12 +$114.4550% 16.4 148.6 -5.5 +$27.85 $800.44 +$122.77

AVERAGE 151.7Crimson Clover $21.00100% 16.4 142.4 $698.56 +$20.8975% 16.4 135.5 -6.9 -$10.56 $688.00 +$10.3350% 16.4 119.1 -23.3 -$77.17 $621.39 -$56.28

AVERAGE 132.3GroundHog™ Brand Radish $20.80100% 16.3 147.7 $730.03 +$52.3675% 16.4 133.0 -14.7 -$56.58 $673.45 -$4.2250% 16.3 118.5 -29.2 -$111.98 $618.05 -$59.62

AVERAGE 133.1Beck’s Corn Champion Mix $28.80100% 16.3 150.6 $739.14 +$61.4775% 16.3 141.9 -8.7 -$21.18 $717.96 +$40.2950% 16.4 108.6 -42.0 -$187.50 $551.64 -$126.03

AVERAGE 133.7Beck’s Bean Builder Mix $24.00100% 16.3 148.8 $733.32 +$55.6575% 16.3 145.5 -3.3 +$10.68 $744.00 +$66.3350% 16.3 127.7 -21.1 -$64.19 $669.13 -$8.54

AVERAGE 140.7No Cover Crop ----100% (Check) 16.3 135.3 75% 16.3 126.9 -8.4 -$19.41 $658.26 -$19.4150% 16.3 104.7 -30.6 -$120.24 $557.43 -$120.24

AVERAGE 122.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on gross return minus cost of cover crop. Corn $5.90/Bu. 28% Nitrogen $375.00/ton.GroundHog™ Brand Radish is a trademark of Ampac Seed Company.N-Vest Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass Blend is a registered trademark of The Cisco Company.

Purpose: In this study we are evaluating the advantages of cover crops and their ability to increase yield, soil tilth, scavenge and produce nitrogen, and shatter compaction. Corn was planted into 5 different cover crops that were planted in the fall of 2011. In addition, we also evaluated 3 different nitrogen programs to evaluate nitrogen scavenging and sequestration. These nitrogen rates consisted of 180 lbs. (100%N program), 135 lbs. (75% N program), and 90 lbs. (50% N program).

Summary: Corn planted into cover crops in general, posted average increased yields of 16 Bu./A. over the non-cover crop control. Average overall net returns from cover crops were $72.20/A. This return only calculates cost of seed and does not include tillage and/or herbicide system costs. At 100% rates of nitrogen, cover crops posted average increased yields of 13.4 Bu./A. and net returns of $57.06/A. over the non-cover crop control at 100% nitrogen. To fully evaluate a cover crop's ability to scavenge nitrogen, we then backed nitrogen rates to 75% of the control. Cover crops with these 25% nitrogen reductions offered yield increases of 6.3 Bu./A. and net returns of $45.44/A. over the non-cover crop control at 100% nitrogen. We went even further and compared a 50% nitrogen reduction. This large nitrogen deficit proved too much as cover crops yielded -10.8 Bu/A. less and offered negative net losses of -$25.54/A. compared to the 100% nitrogen non-cover crop control.

Soilbuilder Annual Ryegrass posted the highest yields over the control at 18.8 Bu./A. Even at 75% nitrogen, ryegrass yielded 17 Bu./A. over the control. When the nitrogen program was reduced by 50%, yields only fell an additional 3.7 Bu./A. This proved to be the highest net return in the study at $800.44/A. Data results such as this are exactly what we were trying to accomplish with a cover crop system. Not only did we increase yields, but we reduced the amount of nitrogen applied and at the same time increased total net profits from the system.

At the 25% nitrogen reductions all cover crops, with the exception of the GroundHog Radish, offered higher net returns than the non-cover crop control with 100% nitrogen applied. At 50% nitrogen reductions ryegrass was the only cover crop to offer higher net returns versus the non-cover crop control with 100% nitrogen applied. All other cover crops sustained too large of yield decreases to offset the lower cost of nitrogen.

More research needs to be done to fully understand the true benefits of cover crops and their ability to sequester nitrogen, offer yield benefits and increasing net returns as a result.


171

BECK’S Corn After Cover Crop Study - Continued

100% Nitrogen

75% Nitrogen

50% Nitrogen

RyeGrass $772.59 $792.12 $800.44 SB Mix $733.32 $744.00 $669.13 Corn Mix $739.14 $717.96 $551.64 Clover $698.56 $688.00 $621.39 Radish $730.03 $673.45 $618.05 No Cover Crop $677.67 $658.26 $557.43

$500.00 $550.00 $600.00 $650.00 $700.00 $750.00 $800.00 $850.00

Aver

age

Ret

urn

/ Acr

e

2012 Corn After Cover Crop: Return/A

100% Nitrogen

75% Nitrogen

50% Nitrogen

RyeGrass 154.1 152.3 148.6 Corn Mix 150.6 141.9 108.6 SB Mix 148.8 145.5 127.7 Radish 147.7 133.0 118.5 Clover 142.4 135.5 119.1 No Cover Crop 135.3 126.9 104.7

80.0 90.0

100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0

Aver

age

Yiel

d / A

cre

2012 Corn After Cover Crop: Yield/A

The graphs above represent the data from the previous page for both yield and return per acre.


172


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Gypsum Study on Continuous Corn - 2012Planted: April 8, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 14, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3Replications: Two (averaged)


Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceControl 18.5 56.7 127.8 ----1000# Fall Applied 19.2 56.9 133.1 +5.3

AVERAGE 18.9 56.8 130.5†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.NutraSoft is a registered trademark of The Andersons, Inc.

Purpose: To evaluate applications of gypsum (Calcium Sulfate). NutraSoft® pelletized gypsum was used as a spring applied product. NutraSoft is a pH neutral source of soluble Calcium and Sulfur. It improves soil structure, which allows for increased water penetration and soil moisture retention, resulting in improved root growth. NutraSoft® is manufactured from natural, mined gypsum rock that is micro-ground into a flour like powder. It is then granulated into fertilizer sized moisture dissolvable granules.

Summary: In this first year study with NutraSoft, gypsum applications provided yield increases of 5.3 Bu./A. In the past most gypsum products have been difficult to spread due to the fine texture and moisture conditions of the product. There was a noticeable difference in NutraSoft, as this pelletized gypsum product was very easy to spread and had no problems with caking or plugging in the spreader box.


173


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Irrigation Study - 2012Planted: April 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 17, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 37,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3Replications: Two (averaged)

TreatmentPercent Moisture

Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Net^Return

Irrigation 17.5 58.6 270.0 +134.3 $1,593.00 +$792.37Control 18.8 58.5 135.7 ---- $800.63 ----

AVERAGE 18.2 58.6 202.9 $1,196.82†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. No costs calculated for irrigation.

Purpose: This study is designed to evaluate Beck 5442VT3 in both irrigated and non-irrigated environments. Irrigation was used on a daily basis to offset any negative drought effects. Water was applied as overhead "pivot type" irrigation. Irrigated plots recieved 0.4" of rain twice a day, up to 5 times per week during the peak of the drought in June and July.

Summary: It is very true that rain makes grain! It was a very hot and dry summer at Central IL PFR and when we had the opportunity to make it rain by way of irrigation, yields responded tremendously to the tune of 134.3 Bu./A. No costs were calculated for irrigation, but with the yield increase by adding water, gross revenue was increased by nearly $800/A.

Beck's production irrigation pivots in Atlanta, Indiana.


174


Total 12.99 in.

Planted: May 15, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: October 11, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Two 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5509A3Replications: Three (averaged)

TreatmentEmerged

PopulationTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreSolid 31,600 59.4 23.1 216.1Spider 32,400 59.9 23.0 224.8Paddle 32,500 59.6 23.4 222.91 Spike / 1 Solid 32,100 59.3 23.2 217.2

†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn.

Purpose: To determine what effects different closing wheel types have on plant emergence and yield. Four different closing wheel types were used in this study. Conventional solid rubber closing wheels, 1 spike and 1 solid rubber, Great Plains MFG, Inc. Spider closing wheels and Paddle closing wheels (provided by Yetter Manufacturing, Inc.). The control in this study was the solid rubber closing wheels.

Summary: Planting conditions for this plot were very dry and moisture was almost absent in the seed placement zone of the soil. This year’s data proved that the spider closing wheels provided the highest yields at 224.8 Bu./A which equates to a yield gain of 8.7Bu./A. over the solid wheels. Yetter’s Paddle wheels also performed very well with a respectable 6.8 Bu./A increase over the solid closing wheels. The corn emergence final stand numbers also closely follow this yield trend. This was the first year for this study, more research needs to be done to determine emergence and yield advantages for different closing wheel types.

BECK’S Closing Wheel Study - 2012

210 212 214 216 218 220 222 224 226

Bu.

/A.

Closing Wheel Type

2012 Closing Wheel Study

Solid

Spider

Paddle

1 Spike / 1 Solid

+8.7 +6.8

+1.1


175


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Pinch Row Compaction Study - 2012Planted: April 8, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 2, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictRows: Four 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 5269HXR™*


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

DifferenceControl: Non-Center Fill Planter, Wing Rows 19.8 138.0 ---- $814.20Non-Center Fill Planter, Pinch Rows 19.8 135.8 -2.2 $801.22 -$12.98Control: Simulated-Center Fill Planter, Wing Rows 19.8 137.2 ---- $809.48Simulated-Center Fill Planter, Pinch Rows 19.8 129.2 -8.0 $762.28 -$47.20

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90 corn.

Purpose: To simulate and evaluate pinch row compaction that can be caused by center-fill planters. Center-fill planters have a large hopper box in the center of the main frame of the planter. This hopper box, when filled with seed adds a tremendous amount of central weight to planter systems. This extra weight can cause pinch row compaction from the center tires of the planter as they hold the large majority of mainframe weight.

This study will evaluate the difference in yield of pinch rows, compared to rows that would simulate the outside wings of a planter that would not have pinch row compaction issues. Conditions in this study were almost perfect, as the soils dried out very well for planting and worked beautiful.

This year we are also evaluating pinch row compaction of a non-center fill planter as well, trying to reveal the yield difference of any pinch rows just with tires (duals) of the tractor itself.

Summary: For the second year in a row, center fill pinch rows showed a difference during the whole growing season. With the drought of 2012, center fill pinch rows suffered stress all season long. During the day, it was very typical to see the pinch row leaves rolling and showing a wilting effect. Figure 1 (on the right) shows an example of root size and mass where pinch row compaction was an issue and limited water uptake.

Simulated center fill planter pinch rows caused an average 8.0 Bu./A. yield loss which equated to net losses of $47.20/A. These yield losses are much better than what was seen in 2011, which we attribute to the 2012 dry soil conditions at planting time, versus wetter conditions during the spring of 2011.

Center-fill planters are truly a convenience, eliminating the dumping of small 50 - 60 lb. bags into individual hopper row units, but growers must pay close attention to any detrimental effects that high amounts of central weight may cause with these planter systems.

The first-year non-center fill planter data also revealed pinch row compaction from just the tires (duals) of the tractor, but only showed a 2% yield loss over the pinch rows. This yield loss equated to a 2.2 Bu./A. yield decrease with negative returns of only $12.98/A.

Figure 1.


176


Total 12.99 in.

Purpose: It is estimated that 20% of the corn in Illinois is in a continuous corn rotation. As producers evaluate whether to grow continuous corn, considerations must be given to the “carbon penalty” that can be associated with corn after corn. Corn residue is classified as non-fragile residue and will decompose much slower than residue from soybeans. This residue is a heavy carbon load and needs to go through a period of decomposition. This process can “immobilize” nitrogen that is intended for plant consumption. Corn after corn requires a different approach to nitrogen management in comparison to first year corn.

This study evaluates the effects of the “carbon penalty” and how it relates to corn yields and nitrogen management. To illustrate this, we conducted an experiment that addresses the efficacy of utilizing fall applied programs to help assist decomposition. This study evaluates four products or practices that include the following;

1. BioRed™, a bacteria containing humic acid 2. Liquid UAN 28%, 3. RES 16™, a bio-enzyme product (along with two spring-applied experimentals) 4. A fall control burn that will remove 100% of old corn stalks and leaves.

These four practices were evaluated and compared to a typical corn after corn rotation where a disk-chisel was used to bury and size residue. All treatments received 225 lbs. of nitrogen, in addition to each individual component.

BECK’S Carbon Penalty Study - 2012Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 28, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictRows: Six 30" rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn. Nitrogen $0.67/lb. Res 16 $9.50/A. P-256 $16.00/A. F120320 $9.00/A. BioRed $21.61/A. Application cost of $6.00/A. BioRed is a trademark of Biovante, LLC. RES 16 is a trademark of Bioenzyme, LLC.


Bushels†

Per AcreNet^


100% Fall Burning of Stalks 22.0 157.6 $779.09 +$84.37 30 lbs. Fall Applied 28% 22.3 146.7 $688.68 -$6.041 qt. BioRed Fall Applied 22.2 143.1 $665.94 -$28.7816 oz. Res-16 Fall Applied 22.0 142.8 $676.27 -$18.4516 oz. Fall Res 16 + Spring Applied P-256 21.9 144.9 $666.66 -$28.0616 oz. Fall Res 16 + Spring Applied F120320 22.0 145.3 $676.02 -$18.70Control 22.1 143.3 $694.72 ----

AVERAGE 22.1 146.2 $692.48 ----

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

2012 2011 2010

Yiel

d / A

cre

Crop Year

Multi-Year Carbon Penalty Study

Control

Burn

15.7 Bu./A. Average

Figure 1. Figure 2.

Summary: To prove that there is in fact a carbon penalty associated with continuous corn rotations, we deliberately conducted a control burn to remove all corn residue (Figure 1, previous page). This control burn proved to reduce carbon loads and actually increased corn yields by 14.3 Bu./A. compared to utilizing tillage to decompose residue. This control burn proved to increase farm revenue by nearly $84.00/A. At Beck’s Hybrids we don’t condone or recommend the use of control burns for residue removal. This residue in the future will ultimately help add organic matter and water holding capacity to soil. We only conducted this control burn to prove that corn residue is in fact carbon material that needs to be decomposed quickly to eliminate potential yield losses in corn due to immobilization of nitrogen. Figure 2 (previous page) illustrates the three year data from this carbon penalty study and shows a 15.7 Bu./A. advantage of removing carbon loads before planting continuous corn.

Fall applications of UAN 28% increased yields by 3.4 Bu./A., but failed to offer positive net returns. This additional nitrogen was applied after harvest directly on corn stalks and then incorporated by a disk-chisel. The 28% UAN was intended to provide a nitrogen supply to help feed soil microbes and aid in the decomposition of residue.

BioRed performed well in 2011 with yield gains of 11.3 Bu./A, but this year failed to offer any additional yield benefit over the untreated control. RES 16 along with the experimental products offered -0.5 to +2 Bu./A. yield increases, and failed to offer positive net returns.


177

BECK’S Carbon Penalty Study - Continued


178


Total 12.99 in.

Purpose: To simulate and evaluate a frost environment in Phoenix 5385A3**. Frost simulations will be made beginning at the V1 growth stage and continued through V5. Frost is simulated by “burning the plant tissue” using a propane burner torch. The purpose of this study is to monitor crop responses including plant health, death loss, and recovery.

BECK’S Frost Simulation Study - 2012Planted: April 8, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30" rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5385A3**


†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

Summary: For the 2012 growing season, the V1 frost did not suffer any yield loss. As the growing stages progressed yield losses became more evident. The V4 frost event gave average yield losses of 37 Bu./A., while the V5 frost reduced yields by 82 Bu./A.!

In most years, corn at growth stages of VE - V2 can withstand frost events fairly well. As the corn plant progresses to growth stages of V3 and after, damage from frost events will become more severe and yield loss will be more dramatic. The graph below illustrates yield losses from frost simulation during 2009 - 2012.

Frost Damage TimingPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

Difference

% of Control (Bu./A.)

V1 Frost 19.6 158.2 +0.6 98V2 Frost 19.3 161.0 -5.2 99V3 Frost 19.8 156.3 -8.0 96V4 Frost 19.7 123.5 -36.9 76V5 Frost 19.8 79.3 -82.8 49

FROST AVERAGE 19.6 135.7 ---- ---- CONTROL AVERAGE 19.5 162.1 ---- ----

Simulated early frost damage. Clayton Stufflebeam & Jake Ekstrand simulating a frost event on corn at Central Illinois PFR.

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

V1 Frost V2 Frost V3 Frost V4 Frost V5 Frost % Yield Loss 4% 7% 13% 23% 33%

Perc

ent Y

ield

Los

s

2009 - 2012 Frost Percent Yield loss


179


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Hail Study - 2012Planted: April 8, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30" rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5385A3**

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

Hail Damage / TimingPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

Difference% Yield

LossV12 20.4 58.3 -93.3 62%Control 21.1 151.6V14 21.1 80.9 -67.5 47%Control 22.4 148.4VT 21.9 76.5 -78.2 50%Control 22.1 154.7Blister 22.3 91.0 -60.5 40%Control 23.0 151.5Brown Silk 20.6 103.2 -49.0 32%Control 21.9 152.2

HAIL AVERAGE 21.3 82.0CONTROL AVERAGE 22.1 151.7

Purpose: To simulate and evaluate hail damage at various growth stages. Hail simulations were made beginning at V12 and continued through the brown silk growth stage. Hail damage was manually created by hand stripping leaves from the corn plant along with the use of a string trimmer to simulate bruising on the stalk and ears.

Summary: This hail simulation shows the devastating effects that hail storms can do to growing corn. 2012 hail defoliations showed a range of yield losses from 49-93 Bu./A.

Early V6 and V10 hail events were not completed for the 2012 hail study, but 5 year data suggests that corn can somewhat recover from early hail events.

As hail events occurred closer to reproductive stages, yield losses were much more significant. V14 and VT hail damage caused 47-50% yield losses. During reproductive stages, high rates of defoliation can significantly reduce yield by removing green tissue and photosynthetic capability. The graph below illustrates this point as it reveals the five year average hail yield loss percentage at various growth stages.

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

V6 Hail V10 Hail V12 Hail V14 Hail VT Hail BlisterHail

BrownSilk Hail

% Yield Loss 0.12375 0.1695 0.3535 0.3362 0.399 0.241 0.24

5 Year Hail Percent Yield Loss

12.4^ 17.0^ 35.3 33.8 40.0 24.0 24.0

^V6 and V10 percent yield loss is 4 year data from 2008 - 2011.


180


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S PMAX™ Study - 2012Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: October 10, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5552A4**



Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


Control: 4 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 19.3 56.7 143.2 ---- $832.88 ----4 gal. PMAX™ Plus In-Furrow 19.4 56.8 150.0 6.8 $838.76 $5.88Control: 4 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 18.8 56.7 155.6 ---- $906.04 ----4 gal. PMAX™ Plus + 6 oz. Perc Plus In-Furrow 18.8 56.8 164.7 9.1 $923.24 $17.20

AVERAGE 19.1 56.8 153.4 $875.23 †Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $11.56/gal. PMAX Plus, $47.93/gal. Perc Plus, and $3.00/gal. 7-22-5.PMAX is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc.

Purpose: PMAX™ is a phosphate fertilizer additive that reduces phosphate and micronutrient fixation in the soil allowing for maximum crop uptake. When added to liquid or dry phosphate fertilizers, it limits the chemical bonding of the negatively charged phosphate with the positively charged elements (Ca2+, Al3+, Fe3+, Zn2+ or Mg2+) that are present in the fertilizer, water or soil. These positively charged elements attach to PMAX so they no longer have the ability to bond with the negatively charged phosphate. This keeps the phosphate and micronutrients available for uptake by the growing plant.

In this study, we evaluated 4 gal./A. of PMAX Plus, which is a combination product of both PMAX and 7-20-3 ammonium polyphosphate liquid fertilizer. PMAX Plus also contains micronutrients such as copper, zinc, iron, and manganese. The control in this study is 4 gal./A. of our normal program at Central Illinois PFR, which is a 7-22-5 row starter. Both these products are applied at planting and placed in-furrow through seed firmers.

Perc Plus is also evaluated in this study as a tank-mix with PMAX. Perc Plus is intended to be used as a supplement to a standard fertility program by improving plant health through efficient delivery of nitrogen (N) and other essential nutrients (S, Fe, Mn and Zn).

Summary: PMAX Plus averaged a 6.8 Bu./A. yield increase in this study, resulting in net profits of $5.88/A. PMAX has shown an average yield increase of 5.9 Bu./A. (Figure 1) over the last three years at the Central Illinois PFR location and has improved our starter fertilizer program.

The addition of Perc Plus contributed yield gains of 2.3 Bu./A. when tankmixed with PMAX Plus. The total treatment resulted in a net gain of $17.20/A. versus our standard 7-22-5 row starter.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2010 2011 2012

Avg

Yiel

d In

crea

se

PMAX Treatment Date

3 Year PMAX Summary

PMAX

5.9 Bu./A. Avg. Yield Increase

Figure 1.


181


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Avail® Study - 2012Planted: April 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskHarvested: October 10, 2012 Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. 24 oz. DurangoRows: Twelve 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5552A4™*

Previous Crop: Soybeans

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet^

AdvantageControl: 4 gal. 7-22-5 59.9 19.7 158.8 ---- $936.92 ----Avail + 4 gal. 7-22-5 In-Furrow 60.0 19.6 162.2 +3.4 $953.29 +$16.37

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $3.70/A. of Avail.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Avail® is a registered trademark of Specialty Fertilizer Products.

Purpose: This study evaluates the use of Avail® tank-mixed with a 7-22-5 starter fertilizer program. Avail® is a phosphate efficiency fertilizer designed to be mixed into liquid phosphate fertilizers to reduce tie-up of phosphate and make phosphate more available to the plant. Avail® increases phosphate availability through all stages of plant growth, including the early development period crucial for increasing yield potential. Avail is a patented technology that surrounds phosphorus fertilizer in a water-soluble “shield.” By blocking the bonds of attraction of chemical elements in the soil to the phosphorus, more of the phosphorus is available for your crop. When phosphorous fertilizer is applied, it is a negative charged material in the soil. When this fertilizer is applied, the positive ions in the soil attach to the phosphorous fertilizer and can make it unavailable to plants. Avail is a negative charged product and thus attracts the positive charges in the soil and leaves the phosphate free and available for plant uptake.

Summary: Avail tank-mixed with 4 gallons of 7-22-5 starter fertilizer, yielded an additional 3.4 Bu./A. over a stand-alone 7-22-5 starter application. This positive yield response equated to a net return on investment of $16.36/A. Figure 1 illustrates four year data compiled at Central IL PFR showing that Avail has offered an average yield increase of 4.9 Bu./A. with returns of $18.94/A.

$-

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

$12.00

$14.00

$16.00

$18.00

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2009 2010 2011 2012

Net R

eturn / Acre

Bu.

/A Y

ield

Adv

anta

ge

Treatment Year

Mul$-‐Year Avail Summary

Figure 1.


182


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Priaxor Fungicide Study - 2012Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 20, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict Rows: Four 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3


Test†

WeightBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceControl 18.0 57.2 125.1 ----4 oz/A. Priaxor™ 18.3 57.5 139.1 14.010 oz. Headline AMP® 18.5 57.6 137.2 12.1

AVERAGE 18.3 57.4 133.8†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn. No additional costs were calculated in this study because Prexior was not released until late 2012.Headline, Headline AMP and Xemium are registered trademarks of BASF. Priaxor is a trademark of BASF.

Purpose: To evaluate two fungicide products at the R1 growth stage on BECK 5442VT3. The fungicide products used in this study are Headline AMP® and Priaxor™. Priaxor is a new fungicide released in 2012 from BASF. It contains the same active ingredient in Headline® fungicide, as well as Xemium® a new carboxamide class of fungicide that inhibits fungal spore growth. Priaxor™ is a 2:1 ratio of Headline® and Xemium®. Headline AMP® contains Headline® fungicide as well, but contains a triazole called metconazole.

Summary: Priaxor applications increased yields of BECK 5442VT3 by an average of 14.0 Bu/A. Headline AMP also offered yield increases of 12.1 Bu./A.


183


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Evito® In-Furrow Fungicide Study on Corn - 2012Planted: April 22, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 5442VT3


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^

ReturnAdv. Over

ControlControl 22.5 220.6 ---- ---- $1,301.54 ----2 oz. Evito In-Furrow at Plant 22.9 225.2 +4.6 $17.50 $1,311.18 +$9.64

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.EVITO is a registered trademark of Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC.^Net Return is based on corn price of $5.90/Bu., Evito cost is $17.50/A.The "Xylem Pro Technology" slogan is a trademark of Arysta LifeScience North America, LLC

Purpose: Evito® is a broad spectrum fluoxastrobin fungicide for the control of field diseases in corn and soybeans and works by interfering with respiration in fungi and inhibits spore germination and mycelial growth. Evito is the next generation, low use fungicide with Xylem Pro Technology™ that distributes the fungicide throughout the plant, moving to all areas of the leaves with water flow. Evito® also provides plant health effects from increasing efficiency of carbon assimilation, nitrogen fixation and water utilization. This study evaluates the use of 2 oz./A. of Evito® in-furrow at planting through seed firmers on both sides of the seed.

Summary: In-Furrow applications showed yield enhancements of 4.6 Bu./A. with an increased return on investment of $9.64/A. In its second year of testing at CILPFR, Evito® has shown an average net return increase of $9.83/A. with an increased yield of 4.3 Bu./A. over 2 years. At a low use rate of only 2 oz./A., this could be an easy way of applying a soil applied fungicide near the seed at planting.


184


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S versaMax™ Corn Study - 2012Planted: April 18, 2012 Previous Crop: Corn / SoybeansHarvested: September 24, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 6175AMX™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageCORN AFTER SOYBEANSControl 20.8 217.4 ---- $1,282.66 ----1 qt. VersaMax™ 20.5 224.9 +7.5 $1,315.79 +$39.13

CORN AFTER CORNControl 20.8 207.9 ---- $1,226.61 ----1 qt. VersaMax™ 20.5 213.7 +5.8 $1,249.71 +$29.10

Purpose: This is our second year evaluating applications of VersaMax™ Corn, which is a mixture of macro and micronutrients that can be applied as a foliar application or in row starter/sidedress applications. VersaMax improves plant health by providing efficient delivery of nitrogen (N) and other essential nutrients (S, Fe, Mn and Zn) as part of a total fertility program that will decrease plant stresses and increase potential for maximum genetic expression. VersaMax also has ingredients in the formulation that enhance the spray tank mix compatibility and spray humectancy to provide improved nutrient uptake. In this study we compare foliar treatments at 1 qt./A. applied at the V5 growth stage in both continuous corn and first year corn environments.

Summary: The average V5 foliar treatments provided yield increases of 6.7 Bu./A., as well as net advantages of $34.15/A. Figures 1 and 2 illustrate two year data showing an average yield increase of 4.7 Bu./A. with returns of $25.32/A. At a price of only $5.12/A., VersaMax has performed well in our testing program with excellent returns.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, VersaMax cost is $5.12/A.VersaMax is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Yiel

d In

crea

se /

Acr

e

VersaMax Treatment

2 Year VersaMax Treatment Yields

2011

2012

+4.7 BU. AVG.

$0.00

$5.00

$10.00

$15.00

$20.00

$25.00

$30.00

$35.00

Return / Acre

Foliar Application

2 Year VersaMax Treatment Returns

2011

2012

+$25.32/A.

Figure 1. Figure 2.


185


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Yield King Corn Study - 2012Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30" rows Product Tested: BECK 4613A4Replications: Two (averaged)

†Bushels per acre and test weight are corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90 corn, $13.35/A. KaPre proCreate and $8.25/A. Yield King Gold. KaPre is a registered trademark of LidoChem, Inc.

Summary: In this first year study at Central Illinois PFR, KaPre® proCreate additions to our starter program offered yield increases of 3.1 Bu./A and net returns $4.94/A. Stand alone V5 foliar applications of Yield King Gold offered yield increases of 4.7 Bu./A. and net returns of $19.48/A. Combination treatments of the KaPre® proCreate and Yield King Gold V5 foliar offered the highest yield increases in this study 8.2Bu./A and a return on investment of $26.78/A.

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


Control: 4 gal. 7-22-5 55.9 18.0 183.1 $1,080.29 3 qts. proCreate + 4 gal. 7-22-5 Row Starter 56.9 18.1 186.2 +3.1 $1,085.23 +$4.94 3 qts. proCreate + 4 gal. 7-22-5 Row Starter 56.9 17.9 191.3 +8.2 $1,107.07 +$26.78

+ 2 qts. Yield King Gold @ V5 2 qts. V5 Yield King Gold @ V5 56.9 18.0 187.8 +4.7 $1,099.77 +$19.48

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of KaPre® proCreate provided by LidoChem, Inc. and Yield King Gold provided by Advanced Agricultural Services LLC. KaPre® proCreate can be used alone or blended with liquid foliar and soil applied fertilizer solutions. It can also be used with Pop-Up fertilizers. When used at the recommended rates, KaPre® proCreate delivers labeled rates of each of the powerful components critical for successful germination, establishment and production. Yield King Gold stimulates root development, and promotes larger leaf size for faster canopy and better sunlight interception. It also replaces manganese that is tied up or stripped out of a plant with a glyphosate application when growing glyphosate tolerant crops. Yield King Gold contains components and nutrients that will improve plant health including a new compound called urea phosphonate (phosphate) that is used on agricultural crops as a fertilizer and a fungicide. It has the ability to feed the plant while helping control diseases that are responsible for reducing yields. Yield King Gold helps control diseases such as Pythium, Northern Corn Leaf Blight, Rhiozoctonia and Fusarium. The immune system of the plant is also enhanced, helping it resist disease.


186


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S 0-0-14 Potassium Study - 2012Planted: April 23, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5552A4**


TreatmentBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^

ReturnReturn on^ Investment

Control 112.3 ---- ---- $662.57 ----20 gal. 0-0-14 V10 SideDress with Miller High Pressure Injection 114.6 2.3 $38.00 $638.14 -$24.43

20 gal. 0-0-14 V10 SideDress with YDrop™ 119.4 7.1 $38.00 $666.46 +$3.89AVERAGE 115.4 4.7 $655.7 -$10.3

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 15% moisture.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.^Net Return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $1.45/gal. 0-0-14 and an application cost of $9.00/A.YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

Purpose: To evaluate V10 applications of a liquid 0-0-14 muriate of potash in corn. Given the drought conditions of 2012, we wanted to try using the 0-0-14 to assist in plant development and increase the management of water in dry soil conditions.

We also tested various application methods of sidedressing the 0-0-14 product. Sidedressing was done with a Miller Nitro high-clearance tractor and liquid toolbar that applied 0-0-14 in the center of each row 5 inches deep. We also tested a New Holland high-clearance sprayer equipped with YDrops™ that applied the same 0-0-14 product in a precision dribble placement 2 - 3 inches from each corn row.

Summary: 0-0-14 applications on average offered yield increases of 4.7 Bu./A., however the applications did not provide positive economic returns overall. It is interesting to note that the YDrop applications incurred 4.8 Bu./A. yield increases over a standard sidedress in the center of the row. Due to drought conditions, precision applying the liquid fertilizer closer to the corn rows equated to additional returns of $28.32/A.

YDrops on New Holland SP275F applies sidedress product with precision dribble 2 - 3 inches from rows. Inset photo: Central Illinois PFR team installing YDrops.


187


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Calcium Nitrate Study on Continuous Corn - 2012

Planted: April 25, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 26, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,500 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 4613A4Replications: Two (averaged)


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^


Control 19.0 164.32 gal. In-Furrow 18.8 166.2 +1.9 $10.00 $969.37 +$1.21 2 gal. In-Furrow + V5 Post 18.4 167.1 +2.8 $20.00 $965.89 -$3.482. gal. V5 Post 18.5 168.0 +3.7 $10.00 $981.20 +$11.83

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $5.00/gal. calcium nitrate.

Purpose: EezyCal 8-0-0-10 is a manufactured true solution liquid calcium. EezyCal is a clear liquid product designed for both foliar and soil applications. It contains an organic component and sequestering agent to aid compatibility with most herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. EezyCal was applied in-furrow and V5 post.

Summary: The 2 gallon V5 post application provided the best yields at 168 Bu./A equating to a net advantage of $11.83/A. over the control. The in-furrow and combo applications offered a yield advantage but suffered a loss in net return of $3.48.


188


Total 12.99 in.

Planted: May 22, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 25, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 35,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: Phoenix 5552A4**



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnAdv. of

ApplicationControl 24.1 241.1 ---- $1,422.49 ----8 oz. Respire™ @ V4 24.2 249.3 +8.2 $1,464.87 +$42.38

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90 corn and $6.00/A. cost of Respire™.**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.Respire is a registered trademark of Chandler, Inc.

Purpose: Respire™ is a non-toxic liquid plant food containing micronutrients and biostimulants that promote efficient plant growth. Foliar applications boost plant respiration under drought stress or unfavorable weather conditions. This product is designed as a foliar spray treatment applied before the V5 growth stage in corn.

Respire contains 7% nitrogen, copper, iron, manganese, magnesium, zinc, sulfer, boron and molybdenum.

Summary: In this first year study at Central Illinois PFR, Respire™ performed exceptionally well in the drought conditions of 2012. Applications of Respire™ offered yield increases of 8.2 Bu./A. with net returns of $42.38/A. More research needs to be done on this product, but we are excited about this year's results.

This was a late planted corn trial (May 22) and the near 250 Bu./A. yields of Phoenix 5552A4** were incredible! This just shows how the high temperatures and lack of rainfall impacted corn yields in 2012. Much cooler temperatures and some rainfall proved to be a much more favorable environment, which helped lead to the high yields.

BECK’S Respire™ Foliar Study - 2012


189


Total 12.99 in.

YieldRank Brand

Relative Maturity

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP II

1 BECK 297NL 2.9 13.4 73.52 BECK 276NL 2.7 13.3 73.03 BECK 265NL 2.6 13.0 62.94 BECK EX 6204™* 2.7 12.9 58.45 BECK 263NR™* 2.6 13.0 58.06 BECK 294NR™* 2.9 13.1 57.37 BECK 229NR™* 2.2 12.9 56.38 BECK 241NR™* 2.4 12.5 56.29 BECK EX 6201™* 2.5 12.6 54.3

GROUP III & Iv1 BECK 313NL 3.1 13.2 78.82 BECK 389N 3.8 13.6 77.53 BECK 414N 4.1 13.4 76.54 BECK 356NL 3.5 13.7 75.65 BECK 306NL 3.0 13.4 74.76 BECK 331N 3.3 13.5 73.77 BECK 372NL 3.7 13.5 72.58 BECK 319N 3.1 13.5 69.29 BECK 386NL 3.8 13.4 68.010 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 13.8 67.711 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 13.4 67.712 BECK 398NR 3.9 13.3 66.913 BECK 348NR™* 3.4 13.4 59.014 BECK EX 6206™* 3.0 13.3 58.715 BECK 335NR™* 3.3 13.2 58.216 BECK 325NR™* 3.4 12.9 56.3

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - 2012


Planted: April 27, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 18, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. VerdictRows: Four 30" rows 24 oz. Durango


190


Total 12.99 in.

Purpose: This study is part of an effort by BECK’S PFR team to reach 100 bushel soybean yields! Various treatments throughout the growing season were used to enhance yield potential. Every entry in this study was treated with Headline fungicide and Respect® insecticide. The following are the individual treatments that were used in this study in an effort to increase yield:

Cobra®: Used in this study at the V3 growth stage in an attempt to shorten internode growth and increase pod development.

Invinsa™: Used as an ethylene management enhancing product.

v3 Roll: Physical damage by way of a roller was applied to soybeans at the V3 growth stage to shorten internode growth and stimulate pod development.

YDrop™: An R2 application of 5 gallons each of 28%, 7-22-5 and 0-0-14 was used to offer spoon feeding of NPK nutrients thru YDrop precision placement.

Nitrogen: 20 gallons of preplant incorporated 28% nitrogen, used to stimulate early growth and offer soybeans early nitrogen source until nodulation can take over.

PMAX Plus™: A combination product of PMAX, 7-20-3 ammonium polyphosphate liquid fertilizer, copper, zinc, iron, and manganese. Applied at R2 to spoon feed nutrients.

Foliar King Red: A 6-18-5 foliar fertilizer for soybeans. Contains a new compound called urea phosphonate that is used as a fertilizer as well as a fungicide.

Bioforce®: Combination of micronutrients and natural plant extracts formulated for foliar application to soybeans. It is designed to help enhance flowering and pod set.

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Attempt - 2012Planted: May 5, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 1, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 175,000 Herbicide: 5 oz. VerdictRows: Four 30" rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 362NR™*

BECK 335NR™*


Bushels†

Per AcreBECK 362NR™*

Control 12.2 74.7Cobra® @ V3 12.2 74.460 lbs. PrePlant Nitrogen 12.4 78.1Mechanical Roll @ V3 12.2 78.55 gal. 28%, 5 gal. 7-22-5, 5 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop™ @ R2 12.3 76.7Invinsa @ R2 11.9 76.110 gal. 0-0-14 @ R2 12.2 79.6PMAX Plus @ R2 12.1 76.72 gal. Foliar King Red @ R2 12.3 79.16 oz. Bioforce @ V7 12.2 78.2

AVERAGE 12.2 77.2BECK 335NR™*

Control 11.9 76.4Cobra® @ V3 11.8 78.860 lbs. PrePlant Nitrogen 11.9 79.9Mechanical Roll @ V3 12.2 77.55 gal. 28%, 5 gal. 7-22-5, 5 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop @ R2 11.9 79.7Invinsa @ R2 11.9 79.710 gal. 0-0-14 @ R2 11.8 77.6PMAX Plus @ R2 11.9 75.92 gal. Foliar King Red @ R2 11.8 77.96 oz. Bioforce @ V7 11.8 77.9

AVERAGE 11.9 78.1†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Invinsa is a trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow. YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc. Cobra is a

registered trademark of Valent USA. PMAX Plus is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc. Bioforce is a registered trademark of Nutrient Technologies LLC. Foliar King Red is distributed by Advanced Agriculture Services, LLC.


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceAvERAGESControl 12.1 75.6Cobra® @ V3 12.0 76.6 +1.060 lbs. PrePlant Nitrogen 12.2 79.0 +3.4Mechanical Roll @ V3 12.2 78.0 +2.45 gal. 28%, 5 gal. 7-22-5, 5 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop™ @ R2 12.1 78.2 +2.6Invinsa™ @ R2 11.9 77.9 +2.310 gal. 0-0-14 @ R2 12.0 78.6 +3.0PMAX Plus™ @ R2 12.0 76.3 +0.72 gal. Foliar King Red @ R2 12.1 78.5 +1.96 oz. BioForce @ V7 12.0 78.1 +2.5 AVERAGE +2.2


191

Summary: 100 Bu./A. yields were not accomplished in this high yield study. BECK 362NR™* averaged 77.2 Bu./A, while BECK 335NR™* averaged 78.1 Bu./A. Even though the 100 Bu. level was not reached, we did learn quite a bit about individual treatment performances. Individual treatments increased yield on average by 2.3 Bu./A.

Invinsa offered 2.3 Bu./A. yield enhancements, more than likely helping the soybeans endure the stress better by not responding to ethylene levels and retaining more of its flowers for pod development during the hot and droughty summer. See page 208 for more information and yield results for Invinsa.

Cobra® applications in this study increased yields by an average of 1.0 Bu.A. More information can be found on Cobra applications on page 198.

Bioforce® is a new product that was tested in 2012. Yield gains of 2.5 Bu./A, were documented when applied at V7 growth stages.

Foliar King Red treatments offered 1.9 Bu./A yield gains. This was our first year testing this product and more information can be found on page 210.

Fertilizer applications including preplant 28%, 0-0-14 and 7-22-5 YDrop treatments showed yield increases averaging 3 Bu./A. More information on YDrop soybean applications are on pages 200 - 201.

Physical damage averaged 2.4 Bu./A. advantage. PMAX Plus™ only gained 0.7 Bu./A.

Clearly, more work needs to be done to achieve the 100 Bu./A. yield level. The drought of 2012 did not help our cause this year, but regardless very high yields were still accomplished. We look forward to continuing this quest to reach 100 Bu. soybeans in the future.

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Attempt - Continued

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Invinsa is a trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow. YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc. Cobra is a

registered trademark of Valent USA. PMAX Plus is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc. Bioforce is a registered trademark of Nutrient Technologies LLC.


192


Total 12.99 in.

$600

$620

$640

$660

$680

$700

75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000

Net

Ret

urn

Population

2007 - 2012 Soybean Economic Optimum Population

30"

15"

15" Rows = $33.62 Advantage

50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70

75,000 100,000 125,000 150,000 175,000 200,000

Bu.

/A.

Population

2007 - 2012 Soybean Population Yield

30"

15"

15" Rows = +3.3 Bu./A.

Purpose: In this study, we compared 15 in. and 30 in. row widths at various planting populations from 75,000 - 225,000 seeds/A. Seed costs for each entry were calculated to determine net returns and to establish economic optimum planting rates for each row width system.

BECK’S Soybean Row Width & Population Study - 2012

Planted: May 14, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: Various Herbicide: 5 oz. VerdictRows: Various 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 335NR™*

Target Seeding RateBushels†

Per AcreApprox.

Seed CostNet^

Return

Net Return^

Rank15" ROWS 75,000 64.1 $25.52 $820.60 1100,000 64.1 $34.03 $812.09 2125,000 61.0 $42.54 $762.66 3150,000 58.7 $51.05 $723.79 4175,000 55.3 $59.55 $670.41 5200,000 53.7 $68.06 $640.78 6225,000 53.9 $76.57 $634.91 7

AVERAGE 58.7 $723.61 30" ROWS 75,000 61.1 $25.52 $781.00 1100,000 58.2 $34.03 $734.21 2125,000 55.0 $42.54 $683.46 3150,000 55.1 $51.05 $676.27 5175,000 56.2 $59.55 $682.29 4200,000 55.4 $68.06 $663.22 6225,000 52.6 $76.57 $617.75 7

AVERAGE 56.2 $691.17 †Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return is based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans and $44.24/bag of BECK 335NR™*

Figure 1. Figure 2.

Summary: 15 inch rows out-yielded 30 inch rows by 2.5 Bu./A. over all planting populations. Figure 1 (previous page) illustrates this same trend by revealing a six year average of a 3.3 Bu./A. advantage for 15 inch rows over 30 inch rows. This yield increase equates to a $33.62 advantage in net return over 30 inch rows (Figure 2, previous page).

This year’s population data in both 30 inch and 15 inch rows revealed the highest yields at the lowest planted populations. In both row widths, economic optimum planting populations occurred at 75,000 plants/A. This phenomenon must have been a result of the 2012 drought, high temperatures and low rainfall amounts, causing higher plant populations to suffer in yield. However, Figure 2 illustrates the six year average economic optimum planting populations. This long term data would suggest that 15 inch rows have offered highest returns at planting populations of 150,000 and 125,000 for 30 inch rows.

This year’s population data was obviously skewed by the 2012 drought conditions, therefore it is very important for growers to take into account long term multi-year data versus one year data sets. Beck’s Practical Farm Research strives to inform growers of what has happened over a long period of time versus what has happened for a single growing season.


193

BECK’S Soybean Row Width & Population Study - Continued


194


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soybean Planting Date Study - 2012Planted: Various Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 30, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 144,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. VerdictRows: Four 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 372NL

Purpose: To evaluate different planting dates of soybeans during March, April, May and June. This enables us to see how planting dates affect soybean yield on an annual basis, as well as, multi-year averages.

Planting DatePercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcrePercent

Yield LossBECK 372NL2nd Week March 10.6 74.12nd Week April 10.6 72.1 3.03rd Week April 10.5 71.0 4.02nd Week May 10.5 70.0 6.03rd Week May 10.5 69.5 6.04th Week May 10.5 67.5 9.02nd Week June 10.5 59.3 20.03rd Week June 10.4 50.1 32.0

AVERAGE 10.5 66.7 11.4

Summary: Figure 1 illustrates that the highest yields from this year’s planting date study came from the 2nd week of March, while all planting dates from this study averaged 66.7 Bu./A. This was the first time we have ever been able to plant in March at Central Illinois PFR, and it definitley paid off. This March planting date offered yields of 74.1 Bu./A. After the March planting date, yields throughout April up to the second week of May only waivered just over 4 Bu./A. However, after the 3rd week of May yields started to plummet. The 4th week of May incurred 9% yield losses, 2nd week of June incurred 20% yield losses, and 3rd week of June suffered 32% yield losses.

The long term data in Figure 2 illustrates average yields from soybean planting dates from 2006 - 2012. This data indicates that significant yield losses from planting date does not occur until the 2nd week of June. After the 1st week of June, past data would suggest weekly yield losses of 13.3%.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.

45 50 55 60 65 70 75

2nd Wk March

2nd Wk April

3rd Wk April

2nd Week May

3rd Week May

4th Week May

2nd Week June

3rd Week June

Yiel

d / A

cre

Planting Date

2012 Soybean Planting Date Study

372NL

25

35

45

55

65

2nd Wk Apr

3rd Wk Apr

4th Wk Apr

1st Wk May

2nd Wk May

3rd Wk May

4th Wk May

1st Wk June

2nd Wk June

3rd Wk June

4th Wk June

1st Wk July

Yiel

d / A

cre

Planting Date

2006 - 2012 Soybean Planting Dates

Figure 1.

Figure 2.


195


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soybean Fungicide / Insecticide Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 1, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 165,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 325NR™*


Timing TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageR2 Control 10.0 56.7 ---- $748.44 ----R2 Headline® 10.0 57.8 +1.1 $737.51 -$10.93R2 Headline + Respect® 10.0 58.5 +1.8 $739.53 -$8.91

R2 Control 10.0 55.5 ---- $732.60 ----R2 Headline 9.9 56.5 +1.0 $720.35 -$12.25R2 Headline + Respect 9.9 58.1 +2.6 $734.25 +$1.65




R4 Control 9.9 48.2 ---- $636.24 ----R4 Headline 9.9 49.4 +1.2 $626.63 -$9.61R4 Headline + Respect 9.9 50.2 +2.0 $629.97 -$6.27

R5 Control 9.9 49.5 ---- $653.40 ----R5 Headline 9.9 51.8 +2.3 $658.31 +$4.91R5 Headline + Respect 9.9 55.8 +6.3 $703.89 +$50.49

Purpose: To evaluate soybean fungicide and insecticide treatments during growth stages of R2 - R5. 6 oz./A. of Headline® fungicide was applied weekly to analyze leaf disease control, plant health benefits and overall yield performance. A 4 oz./A. insecticide treatment of Respect® was evaluated for insect control and any synergistic effects.

Summary: Headline® applications on average offered yield gains of 1.3 Bu./A. with negative returns of -$8.86/A. Due to drought conditons, rainfall amounts were very low this growing season and were not conducive to leaf disease development. All R2 - R4 treatments saw a range of average yield increases of 1.0 - 1.2 Bu./A. As a result, these fungicide applications averaged losses of -$10.00 to -$12.00/A. However, yield increases of 2.3 Bu./A. were realized at the R5 growth stage with returns of +$4.91/A. This was more than likely due to increased rainfall, higher leaf wetness and cooler temperatures. For more information regarding fungicide results in comparison to weather data, please refer to pages 231 - 234.

Tankmix treatments of Respect® and Headline faired much better in this study. These treatments gained 3.5 Bu./A. with positive return on investment of $13.72/A. On average this tankmix application was 2.2 Bu./A. better than the stand-alone fungicide treatment.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, Headline $19.45/A, Respect $7.22/A., and an application cost of $6.00/A.Headline and Respect are a registered trademarks of BASF.


196


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S LibertyLink® Soybean Stratego® YLD / Leverage® Study - 2012

Planted: May 12, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Four 30” rowsReplications: Three (averaged)

Purpose: This study evaluates tank mix applications of Stratego® YLD fungicide and Leverage® insecticide on BECK 265NL and BECK 313NL. Stratego YLD is registered for corn and soybeans, featuring the latest in triazole technology. Offering two different modes of action, it provides both preventive and curative activities along with the improved surface coverage and systemic movement to provide broad-spectrum, long-lasting disease control and higher yield potential. Leverage contains Imidacloprid and Cyfluthrin. Applications were made at R2 and R3 growth stages.

Brand TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


BECK 265NL Stratego® YLD + Leverage® 360 @ R3 13.1 67.7 4.7 $863.14 +$31.54 BECK 313NL Stratego YLD + Leverage 360 @ R3 12.9 72.7 3.5 $929.14 +$15.70

BECK 265NL Stratego YLD @ R3 13.1 65.7 2.7 $843.74 +$12.14 BECK 313NL Stratego YLD @ R3 12.6 70.1 0.9 $901.82 -$11.62

BECK 265NL Control @ R3 13.5 63.0 ---- $831.60 ----BECK 313NL Control @ R3 12.6 69.2 ---- $913.44 ----

BECK 265NL Stratego YLD + Leverage 360 @ R2 12.9 71.6 6.6 $914.62 +$56.62 BECK 313NL Stratego YLD + Leverage 360 @ R2 12.7 72.4 4.1 $925.18 +$23.62

BECK 265NL Stratego YLD @ R2 12.9 65.6 0.6 $842.42 -$15.58BECK 313NL Stratego YLD @ R2 12.5 69.3 1.0 $891.26 -$10.30

BECK 265NL Control @ R2 13.4 65.0 ---- $858.00 ----BECK 313NL Control @ R2 13.2 68.3 ---- $901.56 ----

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.^Net Return is based on soybean price of $13.20/Bu., Stratego price of $17.50/A., Leverage price of $7.00/A. and an application cost of $6.00/A.LiberyLink, Stratego and Leverage 360 are registered trademarks of Bayer.

Summary: Regardless of timing, Stratego® YLD applications offered negative overall returns on average with minimal yield increases from 0.6 - 2.7 Bu./A. However, Stratego YLD applications on BECK 265NL at the R3 growth stage did increase yields by 2.7 Bu./A. and garnered a net return of $12.14/A.

When Leverage® was tank-mixed with Stratego YLD, treatments gave exceptional yield increases of 3.5 - 6.6 Bu./A., which led to net returns of $15.70 - $56.62/A. R2 and R3 applications both proved to offer higher yields and net returns, however the earlier R2 applications offered 1.3 Bu./A. additional yield gains and higher net returns of $16.50/A.

With the drought conditions of the 2012 growing season, it appears that the insecticide applications in this study proved to be more beneficial than stand-alone fungicide applications. During times of dry periods, past data from CILPFR has shown to prove that fungicide applications do not work as well as growing conditions that might have more moisture, leaf wetness, and overall vulnerability to leaf diseases. See Soybean Fungicide Timing Study for more information on page 231-234.


197


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Spider Mite Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 31, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 100,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 348NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 10.4 39.1 ---- $516.12 ----1 pt. Chlorpyrifos 10.4 42.0 +2.9 $541.90 +$25.78 1 pt. Dimethoate 10.4 42.6 +3.5 $549.07 +$32.95 2.8 oz. Leverage 360® 10.4 40.7 +1.6 $524.24 +$8.12

AVERAGE 10.4 41.1 $532.83

Purpose: In many of Beck's marketing areas, the drought of 2012 caused outbreaks of high spider mite activity. This study evaluates three different insecticide treatments for the control of spider mites.

Chlorpyrifos is a broad spectrum non-systemic organophosphate compound. Dimethoate is an organophosphate insecticide used to control mites and insects systemically and on contact. Leverage 360® contains Imidacloprid and Cyfluthrin and is a member of the neonicotinoids and pyrethoid family of insecticides. Both Chlorpyrifos and Dimethoate are labeled for control of spider mites, while Leverage 360® is not.

Summary: All three products did offer yield increases in this study with an average increase of 2.7 Bu./A. However, after looking at the net returns, it is clear to see that both Chlorpyrifos and Dimethoate were the two products that did in fact offer the best control of spider mites. Both products saw yield increases of 2.9 - 3.5 Bu./A. with ROIs of $25 - $33/A. Leverage 360®, which is not labeled for spider mites, garnered a 1.6 Bu./A. increase with an $8.12/A. return on investment.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. Chlorpyrifos $6.50/A. Dimethoate $7.25/A. Leverage 360 $7.00/A. Application cost of $6.00/A.Leverge 360 is a registered trademark of Bayer CropScience.

Detailed view of spider mites.


198


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soybean Defoliation / Glucose Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 1, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 325NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 10.4 58.3 ---- $769.56 ----Sweet’N Eezy @ V3 10.4 58.6 +0.3 $762.62 -$6.94Cobra® @ V3 10.4 58.4 +0.1 $744.08 -$25.48Cobra + Sweet’N Eezy @ V3 10.4 59.2 +0.9 $749.74 -$19.82

Control 10.4 58.1 ---- $766.92 ----Sweet’N Eezy @ V6 10.4 58.9 +0.8 $766.58 -$0.34Cobra® @ V6 10.4 57.1 -1.0 $726.92 -$40.00Cobra® + Sweet’N Eezy @ V6 10.4 58.1 0.0 $735.22 -$31.70

Control 10.4 58.1 ---- $766.92 ----Sweet’N Eezy @ R1 10.4 59.2 +1.1 $770.54 +$3.62 Cobra® @ R1 10.2 53.7 -4.4 $682.04 -$84.88Cobra® + Sweet’N Eezy @ R1 10.4 55.0 -3.1 $694.30 -$72.62

Control 10.1 55.6 ---- $733.92 ----Sweet’N Eezy @ R2 10.1 56.8 +1.2 $738.86 +$4.94 Sweet’N Eezy @ R3 10.1 57.0 +1.4 $741.50 +$7.58 Sweet’N Eezy @ R2 + @ R3 10.1 57.6 +2.0 $738.52 +$4.60

Purpose: This study evaluates the effects of glucose (sugar) treatments in conjunction with Cobra® herbicide. Sugar treatments were used to add a carbohydrate food source to the soybeans and to help offset the damaging defoliation of Cobra® herbicide. Cobra herbicide is a defoliator type product that is commonly used as a broadleaf herbicide option and as a compound that can shorten internode growth, overall plant height, plus encourage more pod development.

The sugar product that we used in this study was Sweet’N Eezy. Sweet’N Eezy is marketed by The Andersons and is a clear liquid containing a blend of sugars and carbon. It is a 47% sugar, equivalent to 4.5 lbs. of sugar/gal. Cobra was applied at 12.5 oz./A. Sweet’N Eezy at 1 gal./A.

Summary: When defoliation efforts were made with Cobra® herbicide, yields were decreased on average by -1.8 Bu./A. with corresponding losses of -$50.12/A. V3 applications minimally increased yields at 0.1 Bu./A, however at V6 and R1 yields were decreased by -1.0 and -4.4/Bu.A. These yield losses translated into negative returns on investment of -$40 to -$84.88/A. Obviously, we failed in any efforts to encourage additional pod or node growth. Timing of application was important with Cobra as these treatments caused severe yield loss at later timings. Please note that this Cobra application was only used to defoliate soybeans and not for weed control purposes.

Glucose tankmix applications did in fact help offset some negative effects of the Cobra treatments. Yield increases from glucose/Cobra tankmixes offered 1.0 Bu./A gains with net returns of $8.74/A.

Stand-alone glucose applications before R1 did not see economic gains, but R1 - R3 treatments improved average yield gains to 1.2Bu./A. with return on investment averaging +$5.38/A.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, Cobra $20.80/A, Sweet’N Eezy $4.90/gal, and an application cost of $6.00/A.Cobra is a registered trademark of Valent USA.


199


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Optimize® Study - 2012Planted: May 11, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 27, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECKS 241NR™*


Purpose: Optimize® is a unique seed applied product that enhances natural growth processes essentially enabling soybeans to achieve full genetic potential by maximizing crop performance all season long. Optimize contains a Bradyrhizobium japonicum innoculant along with a LCO Promoter Technology® that is a naturally occurring molecule (Lipo-chitooligosaccharide) that advances both root and shoot development and improves plant health independent of soil conditions. The result of this is healthier soybean plants that can withstand environmental stresses throughout the season.

TreatmentBushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^


Control 47.7 ---- ---- $629.64 ----Optimize® 49.4 +1.7 $4.04 $648.04 +$18.40

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans and $4.04/A. Optimize.Optimize and LCO Promoter Technology are registered trademarks of Novozymes AVS.

Summary: The nine year data below suggests that Optimize® has offered average yield increases of 1.46 Bu./A. with average net returns of $8.43/A. At Beck’s Central Illinois PFR, we have had consistent results with Optimize increasing yields and profitability.

$0.0

$5.0

$10.0

$15.0

$20.0

$25.0

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Return / Acre

9 Year Optimize Study Net Return/Acre

$8.43/A. Average Return


200


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soybean Fertilizer Placement Study - 2012Planted: May 23, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 3, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 140,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 322NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 12.9 33.3 ---- $439.56 ----5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 Hagie Knife 12.9 36.0 2.7 $439.70 +$0.14 5 gal. 7-22-5 + 10 gal. 0-0-14 YDrop™ 12.8 38.7 5.4 $475.34 +$35.78 2 gal. PMAX Plus @ R3 Hagie Knife 12.9 33.9 0.6 $418.36 -$21.202 gal. PMAX Plus @ R3 Foliar 12.7 37.3 4.0 $463.24 +$23.68 2 gal. PMAX Plus @ R3 YDrop 12.8 35.9 2.6 $444.76 +$5.20

AVERAGE 12.8 35.9 $446.80

Purpose: This soybean study was designed to evaluate foliar and in-row applications of liquid fertilizers 7-22-5, 0-0-14 and PMAX Plus™. 7-22-5 is a liquid poly phosphate starter fertilizer. 0-0-14 is liquid muriate of potash. PMAX Plus is a combination of PMAX and 7-20-3 ammonium polyphosphate liquid fertilizer and micronutrients: copper, zinc, iron and manganese. These products were evaluated in three different application methods including a foliar spray, YDrop™ precision placement and knife injection. The goal of this study was to evaluate any yield effects of placing liquid fertilizer 2 - 3” from the soybean row, down the center of a 30” row or as a foliar spray, all at the R3 growth stage.

YDrop is a versatile system that can be installed on almost any spray machine and has the ability to precision place any liquid product within 2 - 3” of a crop row. Its unique design allows liquid products to be applied within the row at anytime throughout the season. We installed the YDrop on a New Holland SP275F high clearance sprayer (Figure 1 & 2). The New Holland was also used to make foliar PMAX Plus spray applications over the top of the soybeans.

A Hagie STS10 (Figure 3, page 201) was also used in this study to place fertilizer product by way of a front mount liquid toolbar with knife injection (Figure 4, page 201). Fertilizer placement was at 4 - 5” depths in the center of a 30” row.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. PMAX Plus $11.56/gal. 7-22-5 $3.00/gal. 0-0-14 $1.45/gal. Application cost of $6.00/A.PMAX Plus is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc. YDrop is a trademark of Ag Alternatives, Inc.

Figure 1. YDrop™ in 30" soybean rows. Figure 2. New Holland equipped with YDrop™.


201

Summary: YDrop™ applications of 7-22-5 and 0-0-14 offered average yield gains of 5.4 Bu./A. with returns near $36.00/A. The YDrop’s ability to precision place fertilizer at the base of the soybean plant allowed for fast and easy uptake of nutrients. Even though the drought of 2012 limited rainfall, the YDrop was able to place fertilizer in the “wet zone”, or the area just near the base of the plant that is typically shaded in a 30” row. This allowed for higher amounts of soil moisture to aid in fertilizer uptake.

Hagie applications of 7-22-5 and 0-0-14 offered yield advantages of 2.7 Bu./A. This lower yield response was most likely due to the fertilizer placement being too far away from the soybean row. It was difficult for soybean plants to utilize the fertilizer product in dry hot soils this season. PMAX Plus applications through the Hagie showed a similar response. When applied in the middle of the row, yield increases were only 0.6 Bu./A. However when YDrop applications placed the PMAX Plus, yields increased to 2.6 Bu/A. and, more importantly, had positive net returns of over $5.00/A.

The New Holland was also used to make foliar applications of PMAX Plus. These treatments performed excellent with yield gains of 4.0 Bu./A. and net returns of $23.68/A. 0-0-14 and 7-22-5 were not used as foliar treatments in this study.

The drought of 2012 played in large role in the outcome of this study. More research needs to be done to analyze these fertilizer treatments and how they are placed and applied.

BECK’S Soybean Fertilizer Placement Study - Continued

Figure 4. Coulter/Knife injection in 30" rows. Figure 5. Hagie and YDrop™ side by side.

Figure 3. Hagie equipped with front mount liquid toolbar.


202


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Soybeans After Cover Crop Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: Corn / Soybeans / Cover CropHarvested: November 1, 2012 Tillage: Reel Disk (spring)Population: 145,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 40 oz. PowerMax & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 362NR™*

Replications: Three (averaged) BECK 335NR™*


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


BECK 362NR™*

Soybeans after Corn 13.6 63.7 ---- +$840.84 ----Soybeans after Beck’s Bean Builder Mix 13.6 63.2 -0.5 +$810.24 -$30.60

AVERAGE 13.6 63.5 +$825.54BECK 335NR™*

Soybeans after Corn 12.9 64.5 ---- +$851.40 ----Soybeans after Beck’s Bean Builder Mix 12.4 64.4 -0.1 +$826.08 -$25.32

AVERAGE 12.7 64.5 +$838.74†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on gross return minus cost of cover crop. Beck’s Bean Builder Mix $24.00/A.GroundHog™ Brand Radish is a trademark of Ampac Seed Company.

Purpose: To evaluate soybeans planted in a soybean after corn rotation versus soybeans grown after a fall planted cover crop. Our cover crop that we planted soybeans into was Beck's Bean Builder Mix. This cover crop seed contains a mix of GroundHog™ Radishes, Annual Ryegrass and Appin Turnips. The cover crop was planted on Sept 11, 2011 with a no-till grain drill.

Summary: Unfortunately, no yield gain was proven from either soybean variety planted in the cover crop rotation. Average yields were within 0.5 Bu/A compared to the soybeans planted into the non-cover crop. In analyzing the total system costs for both rotations, soybeans after the cover crop showed average negative returns of -$27.96/A. More research needs to be conducted to evaluate how soybean yields could be increased from implementing a cover crop program. This demonstration does not include herbicide or equipment costs, due to varying programs that are used with cover crops. A producer must take into account any such costs associated with cover crops. This demonstration only evaluates yield differences.


203


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S BioRed™ Soybean Study - 2012Planted: May 11, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 31, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 322NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 10.3 53.6 ---- $707.52 ----1 qt. BioRed™ In-furrow 10.2 55.6 +2.0 $712.31 +$4.79

AVERAGE $720.72

Purpose: This study evaluates the use of BioRed™ on soybeans. BioRed™ is 100% organic bacteria and contains a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms including those that are nitrogen-fixing. BioRed™ naturally produces plant growth activators within the soil such as: auxins, indoleacetic acid and gibberellins (gibberellic acid) which supports function of growth and maturity in plants. Since BioRed contains both organic matter and microorganisms, it develops its own compost with humates, producing a healthier fertile soil. BioRed microbes convert atmospheric nitrogen to a usable form for the crop and metabolizes enzymes organically, assuring an “on-demand” supply of nitrogen for the plant.

Summary: BioRed™ was applied at a rate of 1 qt./A. in-furrow at planting. Yield gains averaged 2.0 Bu./A., but due to a $21.61 treatment cost, net advantage came in at only $4.79.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans and BioRed $21.61/qt.BioRed is a trademark of Biovante LLC.


204


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S versaMax™ Soybean Study - 2012Planted: May 14, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 3, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 289NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 11.6 65.1 ---- $859.32 ----1 qt. VersaMax™ Soybean @ R2 11.6 66.7 +1.6 $875.19 +$15.87

Purpose: This is a second year study evaluating applications of VersaMax™, which is a mixture of macro and micronutrients that can be applied as a foliar application or in row starter/sidedress applications. VersaMax

is designed for use in both corn and soybeans. VersaMax is intended to be used as a supplement to a standard fertility program. VersaMax will improve plant health by providing efficient delivery of nitrogen (N) and other essential nutrients (S, Fe, Mn and Zn) as part of a total fertility program that will decrease plant stresses and increase potential for maximum genetic expression. VersaMax also has ingredients in the formulation that enhance the spray tank mix compatibility and spray humectancy to provide improved nutrient uptake.

Summary: Replications of VersaMax™ at the R2 growth stage proved to increase yields by 1.6 Bu./A. with net returns of $15.87/A. Over the past 2 years VersaMax has shown positive yield results with an average increase of 1.9 Bu./A.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. VersaMax $5.25/A.VersaMax is a trademark of Midtech R&D, Inc.

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

2011 2012

Yiel

d B

u./A

.

Treatment Years

2 Year VersaMax™ Soybean Data

1.9 Bu./A. Average Increase


205


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Sable® Nitrogen Foliar Feed Study on Soybeans - 2012

Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 31, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 34,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. VerdictRows: Eight 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 348NR™*


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.


Net^Return

Adv. of Application

Control 10.4 66.0 ---- $871.20 $871.20 ----1 gal. Sable® @ R3 10.4 67.4 +1.4 $889.68 $882.18 +$10.98

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans and Sable $7.50/gal.Sable is a registered trademark of Rosens, Inc.

Purpose: Sable® is a 28-0-0 with 72% being in the slow release form. Sable® has a low biuret and salt index and can be mixed with most nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur sources of fertilizer. Also, Sable® mixes well with most common herbicide, insecticides and fungicides. Sable is ideal for foliar applications to crops and can be used in drip and sprinkler irrigation systems. Sable is intended to be used as a supplement to a standard fertilizer program. It will not provide all the nutritional N requirements for the intended crop(s). In this study, Sable will be evaluated in R3 growth stage applications.

Summary: R3 Sable treatments at 1 Gallon/A. offered yield increases of 1.4 Bu./A with net returns of $10.98/A. The graph below reveals the 4 year data of Sable providing average yield increases of 1.5 Bu./A.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2009 2010 2011 2012

Yiel

d A

dvan

tage

Application Year

4 Year Sable Summary

Avg. +1.5 Bu./A.


206


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S BCS - 1940A SDS Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 30, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 145,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. Verdict Rows: Eight 30” rows 24 oz. DurangoReplications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 362NR™*


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceControl 11.5 76.6 ----BCS - 1940A 11.5 79.6 3.0

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans.

Purpose: This study evaluates a new experimental soybean seed treatment from Bayer Crop Science called BCS-1940A. This seed treatment has been designed to offer protection against Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) in soybeans. SDS is the common name for a root-rot of soybeans caused by the fungus Fusarium solani f.sp. glycine. Currently this seed treatment is not available for sale and was grown under crop destruct protocols in 2011 and 2012.

Summary: BCS-1940A offered yield increases of 3.0 Bu./A. in this experimental soybean trial. At $13.20/Bu. soybeans, this reflects a $39.60/A. gross return. This seed treatment was also tested in 2011 and showed similiar yield results of +1.6 Bu./A. increases with returns of $20.40. Both year's results are from areas that have not shown a high presence of SDS activity. More research needs to be done with this seed treatment, however it could be a promising tool in the future for growers who battle SDS on an annual basis.

BECK’S Calcium Nitrate Study on Soybeans - 2012Planted: May 11, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: September 27, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 241NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceCost of

TreatmentNet^


Control 13.6 46.1 ---- ---- $608.52 ----2 gal./A. EezyCal Foliar @ R3 13.3 48.2 +2.1 $16.00 $620.24 +$11.72

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, an application fee of $6.00/A. and an EezyCal cost of $5.00/gal. *XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.

Purpose: EezyCal 8-0-0-10 is a manufactured true solution liquid calcium. EezyCal is a clear liquid product designed for both foliar and soil applications. It contains an organic component and sequestering agent to aid compatibility with most herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides. EezyCal was applied foliar at the R3 growth stage.

Summary: The R3 foliar application of EezyCal offered a yield advantage of 2.1 Bu./A. and a net return advantage of $11.72/A. Two year data suggests that foliar applications of EezyCal has added average yield advantages of 2.4 Bu./A. More research needs to be done to fully understand the benefits of calcium nitrate.


Total 12.99 in.


207


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S AgriGuardian™ Micro Mix Study - 2012Planted: May 20, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 1, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 145,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECKS 325NR™*


Purpose: AgriGuardian™ Micro Mix is a blend of sugar based chelated micronutrients including Mn, Fe, Cu, B, Mo and Co. Micro Mix is designed to overcome subtle micronutrient deficiencies and to offset any negative effects of post-emergent herbicide use.


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

DifferenceControl 12.1 42.5 ---- $561.00 ----Micro Mix 12.2 43.4 0.9 $570.38 $9.38

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer. ^Net Return is based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans, Micro Mix cost of $2.50/A. and no application cost.AgriGuardian is a trademark of AgriGuardian Marketing, LLC.

Summary: For the fourth straight year, Micro Mix has offered yield benefits in this foliar feed fertilizer study. Micro Mix has consistently achieved a 1.2 Bu./A. yield increase with net returns of just under $11.00/A. over the past four years.

BECK’S Soybean Starter Study - 2012Planted: May 13, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: November 2, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 140,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 362NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 13.2 56.5 ---- $745.80 ---- 2 gal. 7-22-5 + 5 gal. 0-0-14 2X2 Starter 11.7 59.4 +2.9 $770.83 +$25.03

Purpose: The goal of this study is to evaluate yield effects of placing liquid fertilizer in a 2x2 band at planting. 7-22-5 is a liquid poly phosphate starter fertilizer and 0-0-14 is liquid muriate of potash.

Summary: 2x2 applications performed nicely with nearly 3 Bu./A. yield gains. After cost of product, these starter treatments netted an addtional $25.03/A. More research needs to be done with starters on soybeans, but these are nice results in this first year study with these products.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. 7-22-5 $3/gal. 0-0-14 $1.45/gal.


Total 12.99 in.


208


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Invinsa™ Study - 2012Planted: May 11, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 29, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 150,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Eight 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 322NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceControl 11.6 54.2 ----Invinsa™ @ R3 11.7 56.6 +2.4

Purpose: We are evaluating the impact of treatments which are designed to alter a plants sensitivity to ethylene. Ethylene is a toxic gas that is overproduced by a plant under stressful conditions.

Invinsa™ crop stress technology is sprayable 1-methylcyclopropene and is used to decrease the plants sensitivity to ethylene. By not responding to ethylene a soybean plant can prevent flower and pod abortion, extend photosynthesis and prevent premature leaf senescence which can all lead to increased yields.

Summary: For the fourth year in a row Invinsa™ continued to offer yield increases. Invinsa™ R3 applications provided yield increases of 2.4Bu./A. Cost for product was not calculated due to Invinsa™ not being commercially available at this time.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.No costs calculated for Invinsa because it is not yet available for commercial sale. Invinsa is a trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow.


209


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Infusion 2.0™ Soybean Study - 2012Planted: May 12, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 30, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 100,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 322NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 10.3 52.9 ---- $698.28 ----Infusion 2.0™ @ V8 10.2 53.9 +1.0 $702.41 +$4.13 Infusion 2.0™ @ V3 10.2 55.2 +2.3 $725.57 +$27.29 Combo @ V3 + @ V8 10.0 56.4 +3.5 $732.34 +$34.06

Purpose: To evaluate Infusion 2.0™, which is a liquid “nano” technology foliar supplement containing up to 90 trace elements. This sea salt solution enhances the immune system of the plant providing a boost in energy and growth. These highly proportioned minerals are pro-active capable of re-energizing to the plant for better plant health. Nutrients within Infusion 2.0 are collected deep from within the ocean where high concentrations of non-polluted mineral-rich water is located. Applications of Infusion 2.0 will not show salinization in the soil or the plant allowing minerals to jump start growth and disease defense mechanisms for the crop.

Along with increasing nutrient capacity in the plant, Infusion 2.0 symbiotically works with microorganisms in the soil enhancing the natural uptake from the soil to the plant. The natural minerals of Infusion 2.0 are not harmful, but beneficial to the plant breaking down pesticide buildup within the plant and soil profile. During non-favorable growing conditions (i.e. cool temperatures, damp soil conditions, compact soils), Infusion 2.0 produces energy for the plant by metabolizing biological systems such as; carbon cycle, cell respiration, nitrogen cycle, mineralization and photosynthesis.

Summary: Combination treatments at V3 and V8 offered the highest responses in this study with a 3.5 Bu./A. increase and a net return on investment just over $34.00/A. Single applications of Infusion 2.0 did not perform as well, but still offered 1.0 - 2.3 Bu./A. increases. Due to the low cost per acre of this product net returns were impressive ranging from $4.13 - $34.00/A. More research needs to be done regarding this product, but with the low cost per acre combined with this year’s yield results Infusion 2.0 looks to be a good candidate for a herbicide tank mix program.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. Infusion $3.07/A. Application cost of $6.00/A. for the V8 and combo treatments only. Infusion 2.0 is a trademark of Biovante LLC. Infusion is certified organic by BCS/OKO


210


Total 12.99 in.

BECK’S Yield King Soybean Study - 2012Planted: May 12, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 30, 2012 Tillage: Chisel / Reel DiskPopulation: 100,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: 5 oz. Verdict & 24 oz. DurangoRows: Six 30” rows Product Tested: BECK 322NR™*



Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnNet

AdvantageControl 10.2 59.0 ---- $778.80 ----4 qts. Yield King Red @ V3 10.3 61.3 2.3 $792.66 $13.86 4 qts. Yield King Red @ R2 10.2 63.7 4.7 $818.34 $39.54 2 qts. Yield King Red Combo @ V3 + @ R2 10.2 63.2 4.2 $811.74 $32.94

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of Yield King Red which is provided by Advanced Agriculture Services LLC. Yield King Red stimulates root development and promotes larger leaf size for faster canopy and better sunlight interception. It also replaces manganese that is tied up or stripped out of a plant with a glyphosate application when growing glyphosate tolerant crops. Yield King Red contains components and nutrients that will improve plant health including a new compound called urea phosphonate (phosphate) that is used on agricultural crops as a fertilizer and a fungicide. It has the ability to feed the plant while helping control diseases that are responsible for reducing yields. Yield King Red has components that have fungal activity on diseases such as Pythium, Phytophthora Root Rot, Rhizoctonia, Fusarium, Downey Mildew and Powdery Mildew along with reduction in white mold. The immune system of the plant is also enhanced, helping it resist disease. Applications of Yield King Red were made at growth stages V3, R2 and a combination of the two.

Summary: Yield King Red applications at the R2 growth stage offered yield increases of 4.7 Bu./A. with net returns over $39.54/A. Earlier V3 applications also showed yield increase, but yields were 2.4 Bu./A. less than the single R2 application. By splitting the treatments into V3 and R2 applications, yields were within 0.5 Bu./A. of the single R2 application. These were nice foliar fertilizer results for this first year study, but more research needs to be done to fully analyze this product.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on $13.20/Bu. soybeans. Yield King Red $16.50/gal. $6.00/A. on R2 applications.

Southern Illinois PFR

211


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - South - 2012

SOUTHERN ILLINOIS PFR CORN PLOTS

Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4-16, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Three 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®,

29 oz. Liberty & 16 oz. Flexstar


YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreGROUP III

1 BECK 389N 3.8 13.0 56.22 BECK 386NL 3.8 12.1 51.73 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 12.7 51.64 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 13.2 50.45 BECK 372NL 3.7 12.5 49.46 BECK 398NR 3.9 12.3 47.87 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 12.4 45.9

AVERAGE 12.6 50.4

GROUP Iv1 BECK 431N 4.3 14.0 58.02 BECK 414N 4.1 12.8 55.63 BECK 456NL 4.5 15.1 53.84 BECK 495NR™* 4.9 18.7 53.45 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 13.0 52.26 BECK 477NR™* 4.7 17.3 50.77 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 12.0 50.58 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 12.4 50.09 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 13.9 49.610 BECK 483NL 4.8 21.1 49.111 BECK 423NL 4.2 13.2 49.012 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 14.5 48.7

AVERAGE 14.8 51.7

The extreme weather conditions of Southern Illinois devastated the 2012 corn crop at the SIL PFR Farm. Since the crop was destroyed we will not be publishing any 2012 corn plot data.


212


Total 11.32 in.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

BECK’S Soybean Show Plot - East - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4-16, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Four 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®,

29 oz. Liberty & 16 oz. Flexstar

YieldRank Brand

RelativeMaturity

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre GROUP III

1 BECK EX 6207™* 3.6 12.5 50.02 BECK 389N 3.8 13.4 49.23 BECK 375NR™* 3.7 12.7 47.04 BECK 372NL 3.7 13.2 46.75 BECK 368NR™* 3.6 12.7 45.16 BECK 398NR 3.9 12.5 44.07 BECK 386NL 3.8 12.9 43.6

AVERAGE 12.8 46.5

GROUP Iv1 BECK 456NL 4.5 15.2 51.22 BECK 414N 4.1 15.1 50.83 BECK 431N 4.3 12.9 49.94 BECK 423NL 4.2 14.7 49.65 BECK 418NR™* 4.1 13.0 46.56 BECK EX 6205™* 4.0 12.4 45.97 BECK 444NR™* 4.4 13.6 45.78 BECK 483NL 4.8 14.4 45.69 BECK EX 6202™* 4.2 13.0 45.5

10 BECK 432NR™* 4.3 15.7 45.011 BECK 477NR™* 4.7 12.7 44.212 BECK 495NR™* 4.9 12.8 41.7

AVERAGE 13.8 46.8


213


Total 11.32 in.


BECK’S Specialty Soybean Show Plot - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 16, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Four 30” rows Post: 16 oz. Flexstar

BrandRelativeMaturity

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBECK 389N 3.8 12.9 67.4BECK 414N 4.1 12.7 63.4BECK 431N 4.3 13.2 58.5BECK 331N 3.3 13.3 58.1BECK 319N 3.1 12.9 52.6BECK 327 3.2 13.4 48.7

AVERAGE 13.1 58.1

BECK’S 100 Bushel Soybean Attempt - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4-16, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30" rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Replication: Six (averaged)

Purpose: Identify practices and treatments that allow us to reach a goal of 100 Bu./A.

Base Treatment = Escalate® + Optimize® + Mpact™ + Soil Plus II™ + Headline® + Warrior® Hi-Level Treatment = Base Treatment + Ascend® + sugar + Manganese


Bushels†

Per Acre

Bu./A. Advantage for

TreatmentBECK 375NR™*

Base^ 13.5 63.5 ----Hi-Level^^ 13.4 62.1 -1.4

BECK 444NR™*

Base^ 16.1 65.4 ----Hi-Level^^ 15.8 64.6 -0.8

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Base = Escalate + Optimize + 12.8 oz. Mpact + 32 oz. Soil Plus II preplant broadcast + 6 oz. Headline + 1.6 oz. Warrior II @ R3.^^Hi-Level = Base + 3.2 oz. Ascend in-furrow + 2 lbs. sugar + 32 oz. Manganese @ R3.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck's Superior Hybrids, Inc. Optimize is a registered trademark of EMD Crop BioScience. Mpact is a trademark of Enviro Products Corp. Soil Plus II is a trademark of Cropchem Research, Inc. Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Warrior II is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Ascend is a registered trademark Winfield Solutions, LLC. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: While this year's attempt fell short of our goal, it did produce the highest yields on the farm. Average yield over six replications and two varieties was 63.9 Bu./A., with our highest individual replication reaching 68.8 Bu./A. As in our past attempts, the intensive treatments did not yield more than our base treatment. Considering the severe drought and heat stress experienced at this location, we were pleased with these yields.

RAINFALLApril 2.32 in.May 1.44 in.June 0.83 in. July 0.53 in. August 6.20 in.

Total 11.32 in.


214


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean 15" Row Width / Population Study - 2012Planted: May 12, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 8, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: Various Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Eight 15” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®


Purpose: To determine the economic optimum population for 15" rows. Three varieties were chosen for differences in maturity and diversity in genetics. As more input costs are being moved to the seed side, planting rates are an important economic decision.


Bushels†

Per AcreApprox.

Seed CostNet^

Return

Rank ByAverage

Net Return75,000 SEEDS/A.BECK 375NR™* 14.1 52.9 $26.05 $672.23BECK 418NR™* 13.1 55.0 $26.56 $699.44BECK 432NR™* 15.1 51.8 $25.00 $658.76

AVERAGE 14.1 53.2 $25.87 $676.81 1

100,000 SEEDS/A.BECK 375NR™* 13.9 52.1 $34.72 $653.00BECK 418NR™* 13.0 56.1 $35.42 $705.10BECK 432NR™* 14.4 51.6 $33.34 $647.78

AVERAGE 13.8 53.3 $34.49 $668.63 2


AVERAGE 13.8 52.8 $43.11 $653.41 3


AVERAGE 13.6 53.0 $51.74 $647.42 4


AVERAGE 13.6 52.9 $60.36 $637.48 5


AVERAGE 13.3 51.6 $68.99 $612.57 6

Summary: The highest average yields across varieties occurred at the 100,000 population level, while the economic optimum rate occurred at the 75,000 population level. The 75,000 level was also the optimum rate in 2010, and was number two in 2011, for a three year average optimum economic rate of 75,000. It should be noted that, in all three years, stand establishment was excellent and emerged populations varied little from planted populations.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on yield minus seed cost. Costs based on soybean price of $13.20 and a seed cost of $45.14/unit for 375NR™*, $46.04 for 418NR™* and

$43.34 for 432NR™*. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.


215


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean 20" Row Width / Population Study - 2012Planted: May 12, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 8, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: Various Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Four 20” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®



Bushels†

Per AcreApprox.

Seed CostNet^

Return

Rank ByAverage

Net Return98,250 SEEDS/A.BECK 375NR™* 13.2 53.0 $34.12 $665.48BECK 432NR™* 13.9 48.0 $32.76 $600.84

AVERAGE 13.6 50.5 $33.44 $633.16 1

124,500 SEEDS/A.BECK 375NR™* 13.2 52.7 $43.23 $652.41BECK 432NR™* 14.1 48.4 $41.51 $597.37

AVERAGE 13.7 50.6 $42.37 $624.89 3


AVERAGE 13.7 49.9 $51.82 $606.87 6


AVERAGE 13.5 51.8 $59.22 $624.55 4


AVERAGE 13.4 52.8 $66.62 $630.35 2


AVERAGE 13.6 52.3 $76.32 $614.05 5†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on yield minus seed cost. Costs based on soybean price of $13.20 and a seed cost of $45.14/unit for 375NR™* and $43.34 for 432NR™*.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: Our highest average yields across varieties occurred at the 195,750 population level, while the economic optimum was the 98,250 population rate. Planter gearing limitations would not allow us to evaluate the 75,000 population rate. When comparing this 20" row study with our 15" rows, the 15" rows averaged 0.5 bushels more than the 20" rows.

Purpose: To determine the economic optimum population for 20" rows, two varieties were chosen for differences in maturity and diversity in genetics. As more input costs are being moved to the seed side, planting rates are an important economic decision.


216


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Row Spacing & Population Study - 2012Planted: Various Previous Crop: CornHarvested: Various Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: Various Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Eight 15" rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Brand Target Population

Planted4/28

Planted5/12

Planted6/6

Planted7/4

Average†

Bu./A.BECK 375NR™* 75,000 44.4 52.9 49.2 37.9 46.1

100,000 46.8 52.1 48.6 34.3 45.5125,000 45.8 52.8 54.2 34.0 46.7150,000 45.3 51.9 54.5 35.6 46.8175,000 45.3 53.0 54.1 32.9 46.3200,000 42.0 53.7 49.6 30.5 44.0

AVG. 44.9 52.7 51.7 34.2 45.9

BECK 418NR™* 75,000 45.9 55.0 47.9 35.5 46.1100,000 48.4 56.1 46.8 35.1 46.6125,000 46.2 55.7 51.2 34.5 46.9150,000 50.0 55.3 52.1 36.5 48.5175,000 48.8 54.2 47.4 34.4 46.2200,000 52.9 51.9 47.8 32.5 46.3

AVG. 48.7 54.7 48.9 34.8 46.8

BECK 432NR™* 75,000 44.4 51.8 43.5 38.4 44.5100,000 43.0 51.6 47.0 35.6 44.3125,000 42.9 49.8 45.9 34.6 43.3150,000 43.5 51.7 50.1 35.9 45.3175,000 48.7 51.4 43.1 30.5 43.4200,000 46.8 49.3 45.3 29.9 42.8

AVG. 44.9 50.9 45.8 34.2 43.9

Three Variety Average 75,000 44.9 53.2 46.9 37.3 45.6100,000 46.1 53.3 47.5 35.0 45.5125,000 45.0 52.8 50.4 34.4 45.6150,000 46.3 53.0 52.2 36.0 46.9175,000 47.6 52.9 48.2 32.6 45.3200,000 47.2 51.6 47.6 31.0 44.4

AVG. 46.2 52.8 48.8 34.4 45.5

Purpose: To determine the ideal planting date and population for different varieties. Three varieties were chosen for differences in maturity, diversity in genetics, and were planted at six different populations on four different dates.

Summary: The May 12th planting date produced the highest yields, out-yielding the April 28th date by 6.6 Bu./A. The June 6th date was the second best, out-yielding the April 28th date by 2.6 Bu./A. The July 4th date was hit by a freeze while still green, reducing yields significantly, but still averaged a respectable 34.4 Bu./A. These results closely mirror yields in the area with the earliest planted soybeans being some of the lowest yields. The optimum planting rates were 175,000 for April 28th, 100,000 for May 12th, 150,000 for June 6th, and 75,000 for July 4th. The results of this study were quite different than what we have seen in the past. The 2012 growing season at the Southern Illinois PFR farm created results that are atypical, thus this data should be used cautiously. As always, consult multi-year data as you make decisions.



217


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Fungicide / InsecticideResponse Study - 2012

Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Four 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®


Brand TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreAdv. +/-Control

Return on^ Investment

BECK 368NR™* Control 12.7 52.5BECK 375NR™* Control 13.3 50.4BECK 398NR Control 13.2 45.2BECK 418NR™* Control 12.5 52.2BECK 432NR™* Control 13.6 47.0BECK 444NR™* Control 13.5 51.5BECK 477NR™* Control 13.6 54.8

BECK 368NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 12.5 52.6 +0.1 -$29.89BECK 375NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 13.4 50.5 +0.1 -$29.89BECK 398NR Headline + Warrior II @ R3 12.9 51.5 +6.3 +$51.95BECK 418NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 13.0 51.6 -0.6 -$39.13BECK 432NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 14.4 49.3 +2.3 -$0.85BECK 444NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 13.6 55.2 +3.7 +$17.63BECK 477NR™* Headline + Warrior II @ R3 13.7 51.5 -3.3 -$74.77

Average Yield of Control 50.5Average Yield of Fungicide/Insecticide 51.7 +1.2 -$14.99

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Return on investment based on yield increase/decrease of $13.20/Bu. soybeans minus Headline at $19.46/A., Warrior II at $5.75/A., and application charge of $6.00.Headline is a registered trademark of BASF. Warrior II is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: Our PFR experiments have shown a definite difference in individual corn hybrid response to fungicide applications. This study is to evaluate any differences in soybean variety response to fungicides. All applications were performed at the R3 growth stage.

Summary: Only two varieties, BECK 398NR and BECK 444NR™*, gave positive economic responses. Over all varieties, the fungicide/insecticide application gave a 1.2 Bu./A. yield increase, but a negative economic return of $14.99/A. We suspect that the heat and drought of this season reduced the positive economic response we normally see with soybean fungicide/insecticide applications.


218


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Herbicide Systems - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Four 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX® &Replications: Two (averaged) 29 oz. Liberty

TreatmentPercent Moisture

Bushels†

Per Acre

Yield +/- Bu./A.

DifferenceBECK 418NR™*

Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate 12.4 48.0 ----Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R2 12.7 42.4 -5.6Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R3 12.6 47.8 -0.2Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R4 12.6 47.5 -0.5Glyphosate f/b Glyphosate 12.5 47.8 -0.2

AVERAGE 12.6 46.7

BECK 423NLPre-emg f/b LibertyLink® 11.8 51.6 ----Pre-emg f/b LibertyLink® @R2 12.0 49.6 -2.0Pre-emg f/b LibertyLink® @R3 11.9 50.2 -1.4Pre-emg f/b LibertyLink® @R4 12.1 49.7 -1.9LibertyLink® f/b LibertyLink® 12.8 49.4 -2.2

AVERAGE 12.1 50.1†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.LibertyLink is a registered trademark of Bayer. Roundup Ready and Roundup PowerMAX are registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This study is to evaluate post herbicide timing yield differences with both the Roundup Ready® system and the LibertyLink® system.

Summary: The highest yields from both systems came from a pre-emergence herbicide, followed by either Roundup or Liberty at the labeled application timing. Both systems had a yield decrease when a pre-emergence herbicide was not used. Both systems exhibited a significant yield penalty when post applications were made at the R2 growth stage. Post applications at the R3 and R4 growth stages had a smaller yield penalty, and are more significant with the LibertyLink® system. The average yield for the LibertyLink® system was 3.4 Bu. above the average yield for the Roundup Ready® system.


219


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Tillage Study - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: VariousPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®


Purpose: This long term study is to evaluate various tillage practices and their effect on yield. This is year number three for this study, with each tillage practice performed in the same plot location as previous years.

Product TillagePercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBECK 398NR Spring Strip-Till 12.2 56.1BECK 444NR™* Spring Strip-Till 12.8 66.3

AVERAGE 12.5 61.2

BECK 398NR Inline Rip Fall 2010 / Spring No-Till 12.1 59.3BECK 444NR™* Inline Rip Fall 2010 / Spring No-Till 13.2 66.0

AVERAGE 12.6 62.7

BECK 398NR No-Till 12.0 58.3BECK 444NR™* No-Till 12.9 66.4

AVERAGE 12.4 62.4

BECK 398NR Spring Finishing Tool 12.3 54.0BECK 444NR™* Spring Finishing Tool 13.0 61.8

AVERAGE 12.6 57.9†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Summary: In 2011, no significant differences were found between any of the tillage systems. However, in 2012, both no-till systems gave higher yields than strip-till and spring tillage, with spring tillage being the lowest yielding. Research shows that the presence of heavy residue cover on the no-till and strip-till systems conserves moisture, which leads to higher yields than the spring tillage.


220


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Gypsum Study - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30” rows Post: 29 oz. Liberty Replications: Two (averaged)

Purpose: To determine any soil and yield benefits with the use of gypsum. The gypsum treatments received 1,000 lbs. of gypsum in the spring of of the following years: 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Product TreatmentPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre

Bu./A. Advantagefor Gypsum

BECK 386NL No Gypsum Applied 13.4 49.2BECK 386NL 1,000 lbs. Gypsum 2012, 2011 and 2010 12.9 46.9 -2.3

BECK 426NL No Gypsum Applied 14.2 50.9BECK 426NL 1,000 lbs. Gypsum 2012, 2011 and 2010 13.5 43.5 -7.4


Summary: In 2010, no advantages or disadvantages were observed with the gypsum applications. In 2011, we obtained a 2.2 Bu. yield increase with the gypsum treatments. In 2012, a significant yield decrease was found with the gypsum treatments. This yield disadvantage backed up the visual appearance of the study during the growing season. More work will be done to investigate these results.


221


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Soil Health Study - 2012Planted: May 9, 2012 Previous Crop: Double-Crop SoybeansHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Replications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 375NR™*

Treatment Rate/A.PercentMoisture

Bushels†


Net^ Return

MPACT 12.8 oz. 14.6 46.4 +1.2 +$11.84Soil Plus II™ 1 qt. 14.7 49.5 +4.3 +$43.26S-120320 24 oz. 14.6 45.9 +0.7 +$1.24BioRed™ 32 oz. 14.6 45.8 +0.6 -$13.69Agzyme® 4 qt. 14.5 48.2 +3.0 +$28.60Control ---- 14.4 45.2 ---- ----Super Hume® 2 qt. 14.4 47.7 +2.5 +$25.85Pervaide® 2 qt. 14.3 44.0 -1.2 -$37.84Pro-Soil Foundation 16 oz. 14.5 45.0 -0.2 -$15.14P-256 8 qt. 14.8 43.7 -1.5 -$27.80

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 13% moisture.*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL® is a registered trademark of DuPont Pioneer.^Net return based on a soybean price of $13.20/Bu., MPACT $4.00/A., Soil Plus II $13.50/A., S-120320 $8.00/A., BioRed $21.61/A., Pro-Soil Foundation $12.50/A.,

P-256 $8.00/A., Agzyme $11.00/A., Super Hume $7.15/A. and Pervaide $22.00/A.Agzyme, Super Hume and Pervaide are registered trademarks of Ag Concepts Corp. BioRed is a trademark of Biovante. Soil Plus II is a trademark of Cropchem

Research, Inc. Pro-Soil Foundation is a trademarks of Pro-Soil Ag Solutions. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademark of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: Improving soil health is gaining much interest and this experiment is the first year of a multi-year study to determine if soil health, microbial activity, and yields can be increased by the addition of various soil biology stimulants. All treatments were broadcast preplant and were incorporated by a 1" rain event within two days.

Summary: Most treatments exhibited a positive yield response with the highest response coming from Soil Plus II at a 4.3 Bu./A. advantage over the control and a net profit gain of $43.26/A. This study will continue using the same or similar products applied in the same locations to determine long-term soil health benefits.


222


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Foliar Treatment Study - 2012Planted: May 25, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 16, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30” rows Post: 29 oz. LibertyReplications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 423NL

Treatment Rate/A.PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreAdv. +/-Control Return/A.^

Control ---- 13.2 47.7 ---- ----Manganese 32 oz. 13.6 49.2 1.5 +$8.24Sugar 1 lb. 13.6 47.9 0.2 -$4.36Pro-Soil Triple 3 6.4 oz. 13.5 49.8 2.1 +$10.47Ascend 3.2 oz. 13.0 48.4 0.7 -$3.70Max-In Ultra ZMB 32 oz. 13.2 48.2 0.5 -$6.84

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 13% moisture.^Return/A. based on a soybean price of $13.20/Bu., $5.56/A. for manganese, $1.00/A. for sugar, $11.25/A. for Pro-Soil Triple 3, $6.94 for Ascend, $7.44/A. for Max-In Ultra ZMB and $6.00/A. application charge.Acsend is a registered trademark of Winfield Solutions, Inc. Max-In and Ultra ZMB are registered trademarks of Winfield Solutions, LLC. LibertyLink is a registered trademark of Bayer.

Purpose: This study is to evaluate various foliar treatments on soybeans. All applications were made at the R2 growth stage. The manganese, Pro-Soil Foliar, and Max-In® Ultra ZMB® are micronutrients, Ascend® is a growth regulator, and the sugar was used as a carbohydrate food source.

Summary: Pro-Soil Triple 3 and Manganese were the only treatments to show a significant yield advantage and a positive net return. It should be noted that at application time, plants were under severe drought stress and temperatures were over 100 degrees fahrenheit. We question whether the plants were able to uptake the treatments as efficiently as under more normal conditions.


223


Total 11.32 in.

BECK’S Soybean Sugar + Manganese Study - 2012Planted: April 28, 2012 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Twelve 30” rows Post: 22 oz. Roundup PowerMAX®

Replications: Three (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 398NR

Treatment RatePercentMoisture

Bushels†


Net^ Return

Control ---- 13.4 51.5 ---- ----Sugar + Manganese 2 lbs. Sugar / 32 oz. Manganese 13.7 52.8 +1.3 +$3.60

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 13% moisture.^Net return based on a soybean price of $13.20/Bu., $2.00/A. for sugar, $5.56/A. for Manganese, and $6.00/A. application charge. Roundup PowerMAX is a registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC.

Purpose: This study evaluates the application of sugar and Manganese as a foliar treatment at the R3 growth stage.

Summary: This treatment gave a 1.3 Bu./A. yield advantage and an economic return of $3.60/A. Plants were under severe drought and heat stress at the time of application. Over the last three years at the Southern Illinois PFR location, the applications of sugar and Manganese have shown an average positive economic return.

BECK’S Soybean In-Furrow Study - 2012Planted: May 10, 2012 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: October 4, 2012 Tillage: Light Vertical / No-TillPopulation: 130,000 seeds/A. Herbicide: Pre: 5 oz. SonicRows: Six 30” rows Post: 29 oz. LibertyReplications: Two (averaged) Product Tested: BECK 386NL

Treatment RatePercentMoisture

Bushels†


Net^ Return

Control ---- 12.8 47.3 ---- ----Molybdenum 16 oz. 13.1 48.1 +0.8 +$2.06Soil Plus II 16 oz. 13.3 48.6 +1.3 +$3.66Ascend® 3.2 oz. 13.4 47.2 -0.1 -$8.26

†Bushels per acre are corrected to 13% moisture.^Net return based on a soybean price of $13.20/Bu., $8.50/A. for Molybdenum, $13.50/A. for Soil Plus II and $6.94/A. for Ascend. No application charges were taken, since these were planter applied. Keeton is a registered trademark of Precision Planting, Inc. Soil Plus II is a trademark of Cropchem Research, Inc. Ascend is a registered trademark of Winfield Solutions, LLC. LibertyLink is a registered trademark of Bayer.

Purpose: This study evaluates three products applied in-furrow through Keeton® seed firmers.

Summary: Both Molybdenum and Soil Plus II showed small economic responses, while the growth regulator Ascend did not yield significantly different than the control, and gave a negative economic response.

RAINFALLApril 2.32 in.May 1.44 in.June 0.83 in. July 0.53 in. August 6.20 in.

Total 11.32 in.

Multi-Locations

226

Brand

2012 Bu./A. Advantage

from Split NBECK 5442VT3 -7.9Phoenix 5642A4** -6.8BECK 6626AMX™* -1.7BECK 6175AMX™* +0.7BECK 6733HXR™* +1.0Phoenix 5726A4** +3.2BECK 6272HR™* +7.5BECK 6077AM™* +15.6

BECK’S Corn Nitrogen Utilization Multi-Year Study - 2012Purpose: When talking about a certain hybrid, have you ever heard the statement that hybrid is a nitrogen hog? Or

this hybrid needs its nitrogen all upfront? If you wonder exactly what that means, this study was designed to answer that question and to gain a better understanding of nitrogen use on a per hybrid basis. We tested two nitrogen programs listed below and implemented this study at all four Practical Farm Research sites. 150 lbs. Preplant Only 75 lbs. Preplant and 75 lbs. Sidedress

Summary: We compared hybrid nitrogen efficiency between 150 lbs. of nitrogen 100% preplant or split applied. We tested eight genetic families the past two years. The individual year data shows how the environment affects the plants use of nitrogen. However, when we combine the data into a two year average we see a similar trend. The hybrids that show a negative or very low advantage to split applied nitrogen use nitrogen more efficiently. In general the hybrids that show a large response to split applied nitrogen tend to use nitrogen less efficiently. This study helps identify which hybrids benefit from split applied nitrogen, which can be very helpful in prioritizing acres to sidedress and appropriate placement of hybrids in the field. We plan to continue this study to evaluate nitrogen use over multiple years and genetic families.


Brand

2011 Bu./A. Advantagefrom Split N

BECK 5442VT3 -1.8BECK 6175AMX™* +3.0BECK 6272HR™* +4.2BECK 6733HXR™* +5.4BECK 6626AMX™* +5.6Phoenix 5726A4** +8.9Phoenix 5642A4** +9.4BECK 6077AM™* +13.7

2 Year Summary

BrandBu./A. Advantage

from Split NEarlier User

BECK 5442VT3 -4.81Phoenix 5642A4** +1.26BECK 6175AMX™* +1.83BECK 6626AMX™* +1.91BECK 6733HXR™* +3.20BECK 6272HR™* +5.83Phoenix 5726A4** +6.06BECK 6077AM™* +14.63

Later User

227

Multi-Locations

BECK’S BioRed™ Study - 2012

Summary: When we evaluate three locations of data, we see a yield benefit from BioRed™ 6 out of 9 times. As we evaluated the 3 site average, we received a yield increase from the use of BioRed™ at all three nitrogen programs and a net return that ranges from $10.25 - $59.81. Being a good steward of the land has great importance and we are in favor of reducing nitrogen rates if it can be done without sacrificing net returns. In order for the BioRed™ program to be successful, producers must understand the nitrogen cycle, their current nitrogen program, and must be avid crop scouts during the growing season. By instilling a program of reduced nitrogen rates, growers may need to prepare for an additional late season nitrogen application if nitrogen deficiencies occur.

Purpose: BioRed™ from Global Chem LLC, is a 100% organic bacteria product containing a wide variety of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms, including those that are nitrogen-fixing. BioRed™ naturally produces plant growth activators within the soil such as auxins, indoleacetic acid, and gibberellins (gibberellic acid) which support the functions of growth and maturity in plants. Since BioRed™ contains both organic matter and microorganisms, it develops its own compost which contains humates, producing a healthier fertile soil. BioRed microbes convert atmospheric nitrogen to a usable form for the crop and metabolizes enzymes organically, assuring an “On-Demand” supply of nitrogen for the plant. Global Chem LLC promotes that with the use of BioRed, commercial nitrogen rates can be reduced by up to 50-75% and still maintain yields within 3% of normal nitrogen fertility programs. Best results have occurred when applied early with pre-emerge herbicide or incorporated at planting. All BioRed™ applications in this study were done in preplant situations.

THREE SITE AvERAGEProduct Applied Lbs. N.

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^

ReturnReturn onInvestment

None (Control) 180 (100% N) 23.7 173.5 $1,023.65 ----1 qt. BioRed™ 180 (100% N) 23.8 179.8 +6.3 $1,039.21 +$15.56None 135 (75% N) 23.1 156.0 $920.40 ----1 qt. BioRed™ 135 (75% N) 23.2 161.4 +5.4 $930.65 +$10.25None 90 (50% N) 23.3 138.8 $818.92 ----1 qt. BioRed™ 90 (50% N) 23.2 152.6 +13.8 $878.73 +$59.81

AVERAGE WITHOUT BIORED 23.3 156.1AVERAGE WITH BIORED 23.4 164.6 +8.5

CENTRAL IN CENTRAL IL SOUTHERN INProduct Applied Lbs. N.

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.Diff.

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.Diff.

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.Diff.

None (Control) 180 (100% N) 24.5 168.7 21.2 190.9 25.3 160.91 qt. BioRed™ 180 (100% N) 25.1 166.5 -2.2 20.9 194.6 +3.7 25.3 178.3 +17.4None 135 (75% N) 24.2 155.2 20.0 176.2 25.1 136.51 qt. BioRed™ 135 (75% N) 24.6 152.8 -2.4 20.0 182.7 +6.5 24.9 148.5 +12.0None 90 (50% N) 23.9 151.3 21.1 148.3 24.8 116.91 qt. BioRed™ 90 (50% N) 24.9 150.8 -0.5 20.5 178.2 +29.9 24.3 128.9 +12.0

†Bushels per acre corrected to 15% moisture. Nitrogen was applied 50% preplant and 50% sidedress in all entries. ^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn and BioRed $21.61/A. BioRed is a trademark of Biovante.

Multi-Locations

228

2012 BECK’S Nitrogen Rate StudyPurpose: How much nitrogen should I apply to my corn crop? This is one of the most common questions that we

receive from growers, and one of the most difficult to answer. Although Beck's Practical Farm Research team has developed numerous studies to evaluate nitrogen management over the years, the nitrogen rate study has been the flagship of these testing efforts. In 2006, we were approached by both Purdue University and the University of Illinois to help gather data that might help growers answer this very question. At that time, we adopted the philosophy of basing our nitrogen rate recommendations on the Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rate (EONR), or the rate that maximizes profitability for a given cost of nitrogen and price for corn. We are currently testing rates that range from 0 - 225 lbs./A. for corn after soybeans and 0 - 250 lbs./A. for corn after corn. Treatments are replicated twice at each of our Practical Farm Research facilities. All nitrogen is split applied; with a portion of the nitrogen applied at planting either broadcast or 2x2 and the balance applied at the V3-V4 growth stages. All corn after corn treatments were placed in the same strips as the previous year's study to test the continuity of using the same rate of nitrogen year after year. The yield results for each treatment are plotted on a chart that allows us to determine the approximate yield for each pound of additional nitrogen fertilizer that is applied for that given data set. A selected price per bushel of corn and price per pound of nitrogen are applied, thus resulting in the EONR. Essentially, this has given us the ability to calculate the rate of nitrogen that will maximize profitability based on pricing scenarios given to us by our customers for their farm using yield data collected through Practical Farm Research testing. The results seen below are based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $0.70/lbs. of nitrogen using the data collected from all four farms both from 2012 and collectively over the past 4 years.

Corn After Soybeans

$840.00

$860.00

$880.00

$900.00

$920.00

$940.00

$960.00

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

2012 Economic Optimum N Rate Corn After Soybeans

167 Lbs./A.

229

Multi-Locations

2012 BECK’S Nitrogen Rate Study - Continued

Corn After Corn

Corn After Soybeans

$1,050.00

$1,060.00

$1,070.00

$1,080.00

$1,090.00

$1,100.00

$1,110.00

$1,120.00

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

Economic Optimum N Rate Corn After Soybeans - 4 Year Data

183 Lbs./A.

$890.00

$900.00

$910.00

$920.00

$930.00

$940.00

$950.00

$960.00

175 185 195 205 215 225 235 245

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

2012 Economic Optimum N Rate Corn After Corn

211 Lbs./A.

Multi-Locations

230

2012 BECK’S Nitrogen Rate Study - Continued

Summary: The Economic Optimum Nitrogen Rate (EONR) for corn after soybeans based on yield data collected in 2012 at a price of $5.90/Bu. corn and a nitrogen cost of $0.70/Lbs. of nitrogen is 167 lbs./A. Applying the same economic scenario to yield data collected over the past four years suggest an EONR of 183 Lbs./A. Data collected from our corn after corn testing in 2012 suggested an EONR of 211 lbs./A. The four year average shows an EONR of 215 lbs./A. This suggest that nitrogen rates for corn after corn should be approximately 35 - 45 lbs./A. higher than nitrogen rates used for corn after soybeans to maximize profitability. Although this is higher than standard recommendations in the past, it is not surprising considering that we are planting at higher populations and leaving more residue on the ground, thus increasing the "carbon penalty" for growing corn after corn. For specific location results, refer to the Nitrogen Rate Studies listed under Central Indiana, Southern Indiana and Central Illinois PFR locations.

$960.00

$970.00

$980.00

$990.00

$1,000.00

$1,010.00

$1,020.00

$1,030.00

175 185 195 205 215 225 235 245

Net

Ret

urn

Nitrogen Rate

Economic Optimum N Rate Corn After Corn - 4 Year Data

215 Lbs./A.

Corn After Corn

231

Multi-Locations

2012 PFR Soybean Fungicide Timing StudyBeck’s Hybrids Practical Farm Research conducted its 4th year of soybean fungicide timing research in 2012. These fungicide trials were developed to analyze the performance of soybean fungicides at various stages of R2 through R5. Weather data is a unique aspect to this research study, as climatic variables such as leaf wetness, humidity, temperature, and rainfall are all collected using a weather station as shown in Figure 1 & 2. Leaf wetness sensors calculate the amount of time during a 24 hour period when soybean leaves have high amounts of moisture. This high amount of moisture could indicate that the environment could be adequate for the development and spread of leaf diseases, which could then lead to yield loss. This could lead to an important determination of whether to apply a fungicide treatment to protect soybean yield losses. One of the motives of this study is developing an agronomic model to determine when or if a producer should spray a soybean fungicide. This model could use temperature, rainfall and leaf wetness values to forecast when conditions may be favorable for the development of disease, which would then lead to the recommendation to apply a fungicide.

Figure 1. & 2. Beck’s Hybrid’s Weather Station

The protocol for this study requires fungicide treatments beginning at the growth stage R2. Thereafter, fungicide applications were made weekly through the R5 growth stage. The products used in this multi-year study were Headline, a strobulurin fungicide manufactured by BASF and Stratego YLD, a strobulurin and triazole fungicide from BayerCrop Science. Only Headline was used as the fungicide treatment in 2012. Yields of each week’s treatment were calculated and compared for general fungicide performance and correlation to any weather variables. Treatment costs averaged $19.45/A. for fungicide product and $6.00/A. for ground application. Considering a $13.20/Bu. market price of soybeans, break-even yields needed for fungicide treatments were calculated at 1.93 Bu./A.

Table 1 shows the average leaf wetness, rainfall amount, relative humidity, yield , and temperature for each growth stage. In evaluating these results, the highest fungicide gains in 2012 occurred during the R5 growth stage with average yield increases of 2.3 Bu./A., offering a net return on investment of $4.91/A. R2-R4 applications all gave similar average yield responses of 1.05 - 1.10 Bu./A. with returns on investment near -$11.00/A. Due to the drought conditions of the 2012 growing season, leaf wetness values were at all time lows in the history of this study. These low leaf wetness values were due to very low rainfall amounts throughout the study, coupled with infrequent rainfall events and humidity levels under 70% for the R2 - R3 growth stages. These conditions were not conducive for leaf disease growth and overall caused high crop stress levels throughout the R2 - R4 growth stages. At R5, we did encounter rainfall events that totaled 3.16” which caused leaf wetness levels to spike. When fungicide treatments were applied in this timeframe, yield increases escalated to the highest responses in the study.

Multi-Locations

232

Table 1. 2012 Weather and yield data by growth stage, CILPFR location.

Table 2 illustrates the net change differences in each of the weather components evaluated in this fungicide trial from 2011-2012 during growth stages R2-R5. These large contrasts in leaf wetness, relative humidity, temperature and rainfall help explain the type of growing season we endured at the Central Illinois PFR Center.

Table 2. Net change difference in 2012 from 2011 growing season.

Figure 3 shows the overall results of leaf wetness and average yield response at the CIL PFR Center in 2012. Once again, the highest leaf wetness values throughout the study correlated to highest yield responses from soybean fungicide applications. As leaf wetness values increased, yield responses increased and resulted in net gains from fungicide treatments.

Figure 3. 2012 Leaf wetness and yield data, CILPFR location.

2012 PFR Soybean Fungicide Timing Study - Continued

0.00.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

R2 R2 R3 R3 R4 R4 R5

Avg

Yiel

d Ga

in

Avg

Leaf

Wet

ness

Hrs

/Day

Growth Stage Application

2012 CILPFR Leaf Wetness: Yield

Leaf Wetness

Yield

Growth Stage Leaf Wetness Rainfall Mean Temperature Mean Relative Humidity Yield

R2 1.6 1.2” 81.7° 66.5% +1.05 Bu.R3 1.6 0.4” 81.0° 68.7% +1.10 Bu.R4 2.6 1.2” 73.7° 79.1% +1.10 Bu.R5 5.8 3.16” 70.5° 86.8% +2.30 Bu.

Growth Stage Leaf Wetness Rainfall Mean Temperature Relative Humidity

R2 -81.6% +.16” +1.64° -17.3%R3 -76.8% -1.02” +3.2° -2.1%R4 -46.9% -.17” +1.5° -10.3%R5 +82.8% +2.8” -2.2° +3.3%

233

Multi-Locations

2012 PFR Soybean Fungicide Timing Study - ContinuedFigure 4 illustrates the four year data we have collected thus far representing leaf wetness values and how they correlate to yield gains from soybean fungicides. Over 2009 - 2012, the average break-even price for soybean fungicides is 2.2 Bu./A., when we consider the average price of soybeans and the cost of fungicide product and application associated from it. This break-even price could suggest that leaf wetness values over 5 hrs/day could be an ideal economic threshold for making soybean fungicide applications.

Figure 4. 2009 - 2012 Average leaf wetness and yield data.

To determine if building an agronomic model would be feasible by using leaf wetness values, each 2012 growth stage was evaluated and run through a simulation to determine whether each weekly spraying would have reached the 5 hour/day leaf wetness threshold, and then, if economic returns were received as a result of spraying that week. Table 3 illustrates that this model would have indeed worked for every growth stage. In other words, if a producer used this model to determine when or if to spray a soybean fungicide, positive economic returns would have occurred every time. Conversely, this model would have eliminated those fungicide applications that resulted in negative returns. It also would have increased the average yield gain of fungicides by 1.0 Bu./A. and increased net returns by $13.20/A. 2009 - 2012 data would suggest that by using the leaf wetness economic threshold, yield gains would have averaged 0.93 Bu./A. higher with increased net returns of $10.85/A. from fungicide applications (Table 4, next page).

Table 3. 2012 Success rate of 5 hour leaf wetness model.

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

R2 R3 R4 R5Yi

eld

Incr

ease

Avg

Leaf

Wet

ness

Hrs

/ D

ay

Growth Stage

Multi-Year Leaf Wetness Data 2009-2012

Leaf Wetness

Yield

Growth StageAvg. Leaf Wetness

Yield ResultBu./A.

Economic Yield

Level of 1.93 Bu./A Reached?

Leaf Wetness Trigger of 5 hrs

Reached?R2 1.6 +1.05 No No

R3 1.6 +1.10 No No R4 2.6 +1.05 No No R5 5.3 +2.30 Yes Yes

Multi-Locations

234

2012 PFR Soybean Fungicide Timing Study - ContinuedTable 4. Three year yield and net return increase.

To build an effective and predictive agronomic model, many years of research would have to be collected and analyzed. Until a larger database is collected, leaf wetness economic thresholds are moving averages. These moving averages make it difficult to determine not only current leaf wetness levels, but maybe more importantly, how it relates to temperature and rainfall moving averages and how they correspond to each other. This trial simulation may never be a consistent tool to make an agronomic model, but hopefully will serve as a useful way to analyze current weather variables and possibly as a “guideline” to accurately observe overall crop conditions.

By gaining more information from trials such as this, over time we can educate ourselves about how the relationships differ from multiple variables such as climatic data and yield response to soybean fungicides. In conclusion, more research needs to be done to fully realize the correlation between leaf diseases, weather data and fungicide yield response. This study in Beck’s Practical Farm Research shows that work is being evaluated to determine the value and economics of soybean fungicide applications.

Year Yield Increase by Using

Leaf Wetness Increased Returns from

Fungicide2010 0.98 $9.162011 0.80 $10.202012 1.00 $13.20Avg. 0.93 Bu./A. $10.85/A.

235

Multi-Locations

2012 Corn After Corn Nitrogen TimingPurpose: Applying nitrogen preplant is becoming a common practice for many growers in our marketing area. This

is partially due to the convenience and speed at which the nitrogen can be applied upfront. With the cost of nitrogen continuing to increase, we may need to re-evaluate the methods and timings of our nitrogen applications. This study was designed to compare five different nitrogen timing strategies in an effort to minimize losses and make more nitrogen available to the crop. All treatments in this study received a total of 230 lbs./A. of nitrogen and are compared to the 100% preplant incorporated application.

ApplicationsPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

Return+/-

Control100% Sidedress UAN @ V3 21.0 172.3 $859.07 +$44.2550% Preplant Incorporated UAN f/b 50% Sidedress UAN @ V4 - V5 20.8 172.0 $857.30 +$42.4810 gal. 2x2 UAN f/b Balance Sidedress UAN @ V3 21.0 169.2 $840.78 +$25.96100% Preplant Incorporated UAN (Control) 20.8 164.8 $814.82 ----100% Sidedress UAN @ V6 20.9 164.1 $810.69 -$4.13

AVERAGE 20.9 168.5 $836.53 +$27.14†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return based on $5.90/Bu. corn and $0.70/lb. nitrogen.

Summary: In recent years, split applications and later nitrogen applications proved more profitable than the 100% preplant. This proved true again this year for split applications, but not for later season nitrogen applications. This three location average shows that our 100% V3 sidedress, as well as the 50/50 split application, increased yields and profits significantly over the 100% preplant application. Our 100% V6 sidedress application resulted in our lowest profit margin. This is due to drier than normal soil conditions we received around that V6 timing, which continued throughout the summer months. In most areas, the later the nitrogen was applied, the worse the yield reults were. Overall, with the four different nitrogen timings we received an average $27.14/A. return when compared to the 100% preplant control. For specific location results, refer to the Nitrogen Timing Studies listed under the Central Indiana, Southern Indiana and Central Illinois PFR sites.

Multi-Locations

236

2012 Soybean Herbicide SystemsPurpose: With the increasing weed resistance issues we are currently facing, we decided to start taking a closer look

at using different modes of action. This study was designed to evaluate the potential benefits of utilizing a residual compound as part of a soybean herbicide program. We also tested the growth stage label restrictions on glyphosate and Liberty herbicides.


Bushels†

Per Acre+/-

ControlGlyphosate f/b Glyphosate 12.7 71.1 +0.9Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate (Control) 12.8 70.2 ----Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R2 13.1 66.6 -3.6Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R3 13.1 70.6 +0.4Pre-emg. f/b Glyphosate @ R4 12.9 70.6 +0.4

AVERAGE 12.9 69.8 -0.9

Liberty f/b Liberty 13.2 67.9 -0.8Pre-emg. f/b Liberty (Control) 12.8 68.7 ----Pre-emg. f/b Liberty @ R2 13.0 67.3 -1.4Pre-emg. f/b Liberty @ R3 13.0 67.9 -0.8Pre-emg. f/b Liberty @ R4 13.2 67.4 -1.3

AVERAGE 13.0 67.8 -1.2†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.

Summary: This year's multi-location averages showed mixed results for the use of a residual compound. The use of a residual in the glyphosate system resulted in a -0.9 Bu./A. loss; however, it provided a 0.8 Bu./A. increase in the LibertyLink system. Although a yield benefit may not be seen every year, we strongly recommend the use of a residual compound as part of any soybean herbicide program in an effort to rotate herbicide chemistries and deter the development of herbicide resistance. As mentioned above, we also tested the growth stage label restrictions on applying glyphosate and Liberty. Both herbicide programs received a significant yield decrease when post applications were made at the R2 growth stage. With the exception of the R2 growth stage, we saw minimal differences in the timing of our late herbicide applications. As always, please read the label and follow the instructions provided. For specific location results, please refer to the Soybean Herbicide Systems Studies listed under the Central Indiana, Southern Indiana and Southern Illinois PFR sites.

237

Multi-Locations

2012 Nitrogen StabilizerPurpose: Over the past few years, the interest and use of nitrogen stabilizer products has greatly increased. Every

year it is important not only to apply the correct amount of nitrogen at the right time, but to also protect the nitrogen from denitrification. This year we evaluated three stabilizer products at our Central Indiana and Central Illinois PFR locations. In this study, 180 lbs. of nitrogen, along with the nitrogen enhancement products, were applied over the soil surface and incorporated prior to planting.

TreatmentTest†


Bushels†

Per AcreBu./A.

DifferenceNet^


Agrotain Plus® 59.4 20.2 211.0 +12.0 $1,225.64 +$51.54Nutrisphere-N® 59.7 20.3 208.6 +9.6 $1,212.47 +$38.37Instinct™ 59.1 19.8 207.3 +8.3 $1,212.41 +$38.31Control 59.0 20.1 199.0 $1,174.10

AVERAGE 59.3 20.1 206.5 +10.0 $1,206.16 +$42.74†Bushels per acre and test weight corrected to 15% moisture.^Net return is based on $5.90/Bu. corn, $19.26/A. Agrotain Plus, $18.27/A. Nurtrisphere-N and $10.66/A. Instinct.Agrotain Plus is a registered trademark of Agrotain International LLC. Nutrisphere-N is a registered trademark of SFP. Instinct is a trademark of Dow AgroSciences

Summary: When we evaluated both locations, we received an average 10 Bu./A. yield benefit from the three stabilizer products tested. Agrotain Plus provided a 12 Bu./A. yield increase and a $51.54/A. return on our investment. Putting 100% of the nitrogen upfront was beneficial due to the dry growing conditions we encountered later in the season. This year's results proved that with the use of the stabilizers, we were able to have more nitrogen available for the plant throughout the growing season. For specific location results, please refer to the Nitrogen Stabilizer Studies listed under the Central Indiana and Central Illinois PFR sites.

Multi-Locations

238

One of the newest projects Beck’s PFR team has been researching involves the concept of precision hybrid placement. At Beck’s Hybrids, we are passionate about recommending the right corn hybrid for our customer’s soil types. With this being said, this past year at the Central Illinois Practical Farm Research Center we introduced Beck’s Hybrids very first Variable Hybrid Planter. This precision planter is designed to automatically change hybrids on the fly as it plants throughout the field. The vision of this planter involves strategically changing corn hybrids as we plant through varying soil type changes or management zones. Photo 1 shows a picture of Beck’s Variable Hybrid Planter.

Photo 1.

This planter was originally an 8/15 Kinze split row planter. After some heavy duty modifications, we converted this planter into a twin row configuration which actually served as two 30” row planters on the same toolbar! Once the planter was converted to a twin row toolbar, we had 8 row units on the front of the planter and 8 row units on the back. As a twin row configuration, the rows were spaced 8” apart. Photo 2 shows how the row units are mounted on the toolbar, while Photo 3 illustrates the 8” row spacing distance for each individual row on the planter.

Photo 2. Photo 3.

2012 variable Hybrid Planting Study

239

Multi-Locations

2012 variable Hybrid Planting Study - Continued

In order to utilize this planter for variable hybrid planting, we installed hydraulic motors on each set of 8 rows on the planter. Photo 4 shows the two hydraulic motors for each drive shaft on the front 8 rows as well as the back 8 rows.

Photo 4.

These hydraulic motors were used to turn on or off each set of 8 rows as we planted through the field and allowed us the ability to seamlessly change corn hybrids on the fly. These motors were also used to give us variable rate seeding capabilities. Photo 5 shows the transition where the hydraulic motors turned on and off to plant the appropriate hybrid we wanted for that particular soil type or management zone in the field. Typically the back eight rows (right side of Photo 5), was a more “offensive” type hybrid, while the front eight rows (left side of Photo 5) planted a “defensive” hybrid.

Photo 5.

Multi-Locations

240

Variable hybrid and population rate prescription files can be imported into the onboard computer, which is Precision Planting’s 20/20 with Row Flow module. Prescription files are sent in arcview shapefile format and can be loaded via a USB port. Management zones are a key component of this variable hybrid planting system. Knowing where to plant each hybrid and at what population is a difficult task for each farm. Developing long term yield data is helpful in determining where variable yielding areas are at on a spatial basis within a given field. GPS yield monitor data is probably the best data to use, but soil type (Figure 1) and/or other management zone creations can also be made to develop prescription files for variable hybrid and planting population.

Figure 1 is a farm in Ford County Illinois where the CILPFR conducted variable hybrid planting research. This farm has a variety of soil types and slopes that makes corn hybrid placement very difficult. The 232A is an Ashkum silty clay loam that generally is the highest yielding area of the farm. It has high water holding capacity, high organic matter and produces great yields. However the 146AB is an Elliot silt loam with up to 4% slopes and the 223B2-C2 is a Varna silt loam with up to 6% slopes. These are lower water holding capacity soils, lower in organic matter, and generally are the lowest yielding areas of the farm. After evaluating these production areas, a variable rate prescription was developed to determine corn hybrid placement, as well as planting population for each hybrid in the field. Two corn hybrids were chosen for this field including Phoenix 5385A3** and BECK 6175AMX™*. Phoenix 5385A3** was chosen as the corn hybrid for lower productive soils, as it is a more “defensive” hybrid with great emergence scores. BECK 6175AMX™* was chosen as the “offensive” hybrid and it was placed in the higher productive soils in an effort to achieve high yields. Finally, “educational” blocks were also developed as a control method to help evaluate if the intended hybrid and population was in fact the correct placement or population. These educational blocks evaluated both corn hybrids in each management zone and compared various plant populations within those same zones. Figures 2 and 3 are the variable hybrid and seeding prescription maps for Phoenix 5385A3** and BECK 6175AMX™*.

Figure 1. Soil Type Map Figure 2. Phoenix 5385A3** Figure 3. Beck 6175AMX™*



241

Multi-Locations

Figure 4 illustrates an aerial view of the farm and reveals the contrast of color where the variable rate planting occurred in this research test field. The educational blocks are also very easy to see from this aerial picture. The legend key for the hybrid and population inside the educational blocks are listed on the left of Figure 4.

Figure 4.

"I traveled beyond the Indiana border to see this planter. Beck’s can program the computer to switch hybrids back and forth based upon the decisions they make, and it will do it! Now come the big questions: Where will it fit among innovations? How will it be looked at in 20 years? Will equipment companies flock to it, and will people use it? Will it be as revolutionary as yield monitors and autosteer?"

Tom J. Bechman, Indiana Prairie Farmer Magazine


Educational Block

Phoenix 5385A3**

30,000 seeds/A.BECK 6175AMX™*

36,000 seeds/A.

BECK 6175AMX™*

30,000 seeds/A.Phoenix 5385A3**

34,000 seeds/A.

Educational Block

Phoenix 5385A3**

28,000 seeds/A.BECK 6175AMX™*

34,000 seeds/A.

BECK 6175AMX™*

30,000 seeds/A.Phoenix 5385A3**

34,000 seeds/A.

BECK 6175AMX™*

Phoenix 5385A3**


Multi-Locations

242

Although the drought of 2012 did in fact cause severe yield losses in this field, it was amazing to see the yield differences in the various management zones of high to low productivity soils. Table 1 shows the yield results and net return/A. from this variable hybrid and population study:

Table 1.

Net Return based on $5.90 corn, seed cost of $339.90/bag for BECK 6175AMX™* and $289.90 for Phoenix 5385A3**



variable Hybrid Summary

variable Rate Population Summary

Low Productivity Yield zone

Hybrid Yield Winner $Return GainPhoenix 5385A3** +2.4 Bu./A. $14.16/A.BECK 6175AMX™*

High Productivity Yield zone

Hybrid Yield Winner $Return GainPhoenix 5385A3** BECK 6175AMX™* +18.2 Bu./A. $107.38/A.

Defensive Hybrid Phoenix 5385A3**

Low Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss28,000 Base Control Base Control30,000 -3.2 Bu. -$26.13/A.34,000 -11.1 Bu. -$87.23/A.


High Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss30,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 +1.7 Bu. -$4.47/A.

Offensive Hybrid Beck 6175AMX™*

Low Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss30,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 -5.5 Bu. -$48.01/A.

Offensive Hybrid Beck 6175AMX™*

High Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss30,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 +1.4 Bu. +$16.89/A.36,000 - 1.0 Bu. -$29.24/A.

243

Multi-Locations

2012 variable Hybrid Planting Study - ContinuedBecks CILPFR also conducted research at another location testing the variable hybrid planter. This farm also in Ford County, Illinois has similar soil types and slopes. The same protocol was used for this farm, but we changed the two hybrids being used for this farm. Phoenix 5726A4** was used as the “defensive” type corn hybrid, while Phoenix 5552A4** was used as the “offensive” type hybrid. Table 2 illustrates the results of our variable hybrid and population study for this location.

Table 2.

Net Return based on $5.90 corn and seed cost of $299.90/bag**Phoenix™ brand is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Phoenix™ is a trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

In summary, high plant populations in general suffered significant yield losses due to the severe drought conditions. In both field studies, the low productivity zones offered the highest yields at the lower 28,000 -30,000 populations for both Phoenix 5726A4** and Phoenix 5385A3**. As populations increased, yields were decreased by an average of 11.23 Bu./A. In high productivity yield zones, both BECK 6175AMX™* and Phoenix 5552A4** encountered economic optimum planting populations at 34,000 seeds/acre. As the population was increased to 36,000, minimal yield loss was encountered, but the higher cost of seed resulted in negative net gains. In low productivity soils, both these hybrids offered highest yields and returns at the lowest populations. These results do indicate that planting populations can be easily manipulated by knowing the soils yield capabilities. If a grower understands management zones with-in a field, variable rate seeding is an effective way to increase yield potential, net returns, and at the same time efficiently place the correct amount of seed where needed.

Offensive Hybrid Phoenix 5552A4**

High Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss32,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 + 1.5 Bu. +1.35/A.36,000 -15.2 Bu. -$104.68/A.

Offensive Hybrid Phoenix 5552A4**

Low Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss30,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 -25.3 Bu. -$164.27/A.

variable Hybrid Summary

variable Rate Population Summary

Low Productivity Yield zoneHybrid Yield Winner $Return GainPhoenix 5726A4** +11.2 Bu./A. $66.08/A.Phoenix 5552A4**

High Productivity Yield zoneHybrid Yield Winner $Return GainPhoenix 5726A4** Phoenix 5552A4** +16.3 Bu./A. $96.17/A.


Low Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss28,000 Base Control Base Control30,000 -11.0 Bu. -$72.40/A.34,000 -11.3 Bu. -$89.16/A.


High Productivity Soil zonesPopulation Gain/-Loss $Return Gain/Loss32,000 Base Control Base Control34,000 -25.8 Bu. -$159.72/A.

Multi-Locations

244

In evaluating the results of our multi-location variable hybrid planting study, yields were increased by an average of 17.3 Bu./A. in high productivity yield zones and 6.8 Bu./A. in low productivity yield zones. Changing to a more offensive hybrid in high productivity soils increased net returns by $101.78/A. These large returns may in fact make variable hybrid planting very exciting in the future. It also makes it even more necessary to locate areas of good soil or high productivity on a spatial basis. In years to come this will be interesting to see how these yields and net returns could grow even higher in growing seasons that supply ample amounts of water.

Changing to a defensive type hybrid in low productivity soils increased revenue by $40.12/A. Although these returns were not as successful as the offensive hybrid change in high productivity soils, it may be attributed to the lower than average yields that occurred in the low productivity soils. This will be interesting to evaluate in more “normal” growing seasons in the future where yield swings are not so dramatic.

More research needs to be done to evaluate the practice of variable hybrid planting. Beck’s Practical Farm Research Program looks forward to testing various corn hybrids in the future to help growers choose the best hybrids for their farms. Variable hybrid planting in the future could be an excellent way to master corn hybrid placement. In the days ahead we will see new corn traits that offer tolerance to drought or even nitrogen deficiencies. Variable hybrid planting will allow the ability to place these traits and hybrids that will no doubt give a grower an agronomic advantage. While this technology is in its infant stages, it is imperative that growers start to develop management zones in their fields as soon as possible so that they are ready for this technology if and when it becomes available in the future.


Central Indiana Wheat

245

Planted: October 11, 2011 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: June 20, 2012 Tillage: No-TillPopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. 2,4-D & 20 oz. Class ActReplications: Two (averaged) Fertilizer: 90 lbs. 28% Nitrogen

Insecticide: Escalate®

BECK’S Arcadia Wheat Show Plot - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. *One replication.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.

YieldRank Brand

TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre 1 BECK 135 60.5 13.1 95.4 2 BECK 129 59.4 12.3 94.6 3 BECK 120 60.8 10.9 91.4 4 BECK EX 5006 59.1 12.4 86.8 5 BECK EX 5016 60.8 11.1 86.3 6 BECK 113 61.1 12.2 83.3 7 BECK 126 59.4 11.1 81.4 8 BECK EX 5027 58.8 11.3 81.2 9 BECK EX 5908 61.2 11.6 79.010 BECK EX 5033 60.6 11.6 78.111 BECK EX 5015 62.3 12.0 74.312 BECK 87* 63.6 10.7 73.5

AVERAGE 60.6 11.7 83.8

Planted: October 11, 2011 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: June 20, 2012 Tillage: No-TillPopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. 2,4-D & 20 oz. Class Act

Fertilizer: 90 lbs. 28% NitrogenInsecticide: Escalate®

BECK’S Atlanta Wheat Show Plot - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.

YieldRank Brand

TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre 1 BECK 126 60.7 12.0 109.1 2 BECK 120 59.9 12.3 109.0 3 BECK 113 62.2 12.9 105.5 4 BECK EX 5027 61.0 12.1 104.2 5 BECK EX 5006 57.9 14.4 103.2 6 BECK EX 5016 59.5 12.4 102.4 7 BECK EX 5908 60.3 12.2 100.9 8 BECK EX 5033 60.6 12.1 100.2 9 BECK 113 61.7 12.6 97.410 BECK 129 61.5 12.3 97.411 BECK 5015 60.6 13.1 96.212 BECK 87 63.3 11.5 92.9

AVERAGE 60.8 12.5 101.5


246

Planted: October 11, 2011 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: June 20, 2012 Tillage: No-TillPopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 8 oz. 2,4-D & 20 oz. Class ActRows: Eleven 7.5" rows Fertilizer: 90 lbs. 28% NitrogenReplications: Two (averaged) Insecticide: Escalate®

Product: BECK 135

BECK’S Arcadia Wheat Seed Treatment - 2012

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Dividend Extreme is a registered trademark of Syngenta. Macho is a registered trademark of Albaugh, Inc. QuickRoots is a registered trademark of TJ Technologies, Inc. BioForge is a registered trademark of Stoller, USA. ProSurge is a trademark of Precision Laboratories. Rancona is a registered trademark of Chemtura Corporation. Wuxal is a registered trademark and manufacturing process under license of Aglukon Spezialdünger, Düsseldorf, Germany. Poncho and Proceed are trademarks of Bayer. HeadsUp is a registered trademark, used under license from HeadsUp Plant Protectants Inc. Stamina is a registered trademark of BASF. Natural II is a registered trademark of Incotec.

TreatmentTest


Bushels†

Per AcreDividend Extreme® + Macho® + QuickRoots® 60.9 12.3 96.1Dividend Extreme + Macho + DISCO AG Bronze L-431 61.0 12.3 94.5Dividend Extreme + Macho + QR 1306 + TJF020 61.1 12.7 93.7Dividend Extreme + Macho 60.2 12.5 92.0Dividend Extreme + Macho + BioForge® ST 61.1 12.6 91.2Dividend Extreme + Macho + ProSurge™ (2x Bean Rate) 60.6 12.7 91.1Rancona® Crest 60.7 12.6 91.0Dividend Extreme + Macho + Wuxal ® Terios 61.0 12.4 90.9Untreated 60.8 12.5 90.9Dividend Extreme + Macho +QR 1306 59.6 12.6 89.4Poncho® 600 + Concentrated Proceed™ + HeadsUp® 60.6 12.4 88.8Stamina® F3 HL + Macho 61.4 12.6 87.7Stamina F3 HL + Macho + QuickRoots 60.7 12.5 85.6Dividend Extreme + Macho + QuickRoots +TJF020 60.4 12.5 85.4Poncho 600 + Concentrated Proceed 61.3 12.5 84.3Natural II® 60.7 12.6 83.4

AVERAGE 60.7 12.5 89.8


247

BECK’S Nitrogen / Population Wheat Study - 2012Planted: October 11, 2011 Previous Crop: SoybeansHarvested: June 20, 2012 Tillage: No-TillPopulation: Various Herbicide: 8 oz. 2,4-D & 20 oz. Class ActRows: Twenty-four 7.5" rows Fertilizer: 90 lbs. 28% Nitrogen

Insecticide: Escalate®

Product: BECK 135

Purpose: To evaluate different populations while at the same time trying to determine if a split nitrogen application is beneficial.

Treatment PopulationTest


Bushels†

Per AcreGross

Income^Gross Minus Seed Cost^^

100% March Nitrogen 1.3 million 59.8 13.5 84.0 $554.40 $487.02

80% March and 20% April Nitrogen 1.3 million 61.0 12.1 87.7 $578.82 $511.44

AVERAGE 1.3 million 60.4 12.8 85.9 $566.61 $499.23

100% March Nitrogen 1.7 million 60.7 11.4 89.8 $592.68 $505.36

80% March and 20% April Nitrogen 1.7 million 61.1 11.0 88.8 $586.08 $498.76

AVERAGE 1.7 million 60.9 11.2 89.3 $589.38 $502.06

Summary: We received an increase in yield of 3.4 Bu./A. from the 1.7 million population, however, when we consider the extra cost of seed we only saw a benefit of $2.83/A. In this plot we saw mixed results with a split application of nitrogen. In the 1.3 million seeds/A. area we gained 3.7 Bu./A., but in the 1.7 million population we saw a loss of 1 Bu./A. with the split application of nitrogen. After we consider the cost of an extra trip across the field to split apply the nitrogen, we lose a majority of the additional yield.

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. ^Gross income calculated using $6.60 price for wheat. ^^Seed costs calculated using 2011 list price.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.

248

Southern Indiana Wheat

BECK’S Wheat Show Plot - 2012Planted: October 7, 2011 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk TwicePopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SG

Fertilizer: 90 lbs. 28% NitrogenInsecticide: Escalate® & 1.24 oz. Warrior

YieldRank Brand

HarvestDate

Dry TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre1 BECK 135 6/3/12 61.6 18.7 105.12 BECK 113 6/3/12 64.4 17.9 99.33 BECK 120 6/3/12 61.1 18.2 95.74 BECK 126 6/3/12 62.3 17.9 92.85 BECK 87 5/30/12 62.7 14.2 83.8

AVERAGE 62.4 17.4 95.3†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.

BECK’S Wheat Show Plot: 7.5” vs. 15” Rows by variety - 2012

Purpose: This study compares the performance of five different wheat varieties drilled in 7.5” rows to 15” rows planted with a corn planter unit with a wheat insert.

BrandRow

SpacingDry TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre7.5” Bu./A. Advantage

BECK 87 7.5” 62.7 14.3 84.1 +0.615” 62.6 14.1 83.5

BECK 113 7.5” 63.8 18.3 102.1 +5.715” 64.9 17.5 96.4

BECK 120 7.5” 61.3 18.4 93.1 -5.215” 61.0 17.9 98.3

BECK 126 7.5” 62.6 18.5 93.6 +1.615” 62.0 17.3 92.0

BECK 135 7.5” 61.6 19.1 104.8 -0.615” 61.6 18.2 105.4

AVERAGE 7.5” 62.4 17.7 95.5 +0.415” 62.4 17.0 95.1

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture.Harmony is a registered trademark of DuPont. Warrior is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.

Summary: This year’s evaluation of the current Beck’s wheat line-up in both 7.5” and 15” row spacing showed less than 1 Bu./A. difference between the two row spacing configurations. Strip trial data from the Southern Indiana PFR farm shows only a 1.7 Bu./A. advantage for 7.5" rows compared to 15" rows over the past three years. Another multi-location, replicated wheat row spacing study conducted by Beck's Practical Farm Research team in 2009 and 2010, showed no significant difference in yield between 7.5" and 15" rows.

249


Planted: October 7, 2011 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk TwicePopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SGReplications: Two (averaged) Insecticide: Escalate® & 1.24 oz.

Product Tested: BECK 135

BECK’S High Yield Wheat Attempt - 2012

Purpose: In keeping with our tradition of attempting to break the yield barrier in our 300 Bushel Corn and 100 Bushel Soybean studies, this is the first year that we have conducted a high yield attempt in wheat. There were three approaches tested this year. The first was a high management or "kitchen sink" approach where we used a number of intensive management strategies to protect the crops genetic yield potential. The second was to plant radishes as a companion crop in an attempt to capture unused nitrogen from the previous corn crop. These were compared to a third management strategy based on crop scouting and applying inputs as needed.

Management PracticeDry TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreReturn on

Investment^High Management 62.3 20.7 112.3 -$22.66Scouting Practice 62.2 19.0 107.4 ----Scouting Practice w/ Radishes 62.7 19.6 107.8 -$4.86

†Bushels per acre and test weight were corrected to 13% moisture. ^Return on investment based on $6.60/Bu. wheat minus additional cost for additional treatments including seed, insecticide, fungicide and passes across the field. Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Harmony is a registered trademark of DuPont. Warrior is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Caramba is a registered trademark of BASF. N-PACT is a registered trademark of Loveland Products, Inc. Agrotain is a registered trademark of IMC Phosphates Company and is licensed exclusively to AGROTAIN International LLC.

High Management Scouting PracticeSeeding Rate: 2 million seeds/A. Seeding Rate: 1.5 million seeds/A.Nitrogen Rate: 40 lbs. N (28% UAN w/ Agrotain Plus), Nitrogen Rate: 120 lbs. N (28% UAN w/Agrotain Plus),

2-13-12 3-13-1280 lbs. N (28% UAN), 3-20-121 gal. N-Pact, 4-24-12

Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SG, 3-14-12 Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SG, 3-14-12Insecticide: 1.24 Warrior, 3-14-12 Insecticide: 1.24 oz. Warrior, 3-14-12

1.6 oz. Warrior, 4-24-12Fungicide: 13.5 oz. Caramba, 4-24-12

Summary: Due to favorable weather during grain fill this spring, wheat yields were the highest that we have seen in the eight year history of the PFR program in Southern Indiana. The management practices selected for the scouting practice entries included a single application of nitrogen based on above average growth and tiller promotion in the fall and a standard spring herbicide and insecticide application. This resulted in an average yield of 107.4 Bu./A. The high management or "kitchen sink" entries included bumping the seeding rate to 2 million seeds/A., split applied nitrogen applications, and an additional insecticide, fungicide, and foliar nitrogen application at flowering. The high management entries resulted in a yield of 112.3 Bu./A. The use of 3 lbs. of radishes/A. provided less than a 1 Bu./A. increase. Both the high management and radish entries failed to provide additional profit over the scouting practice this year.

250


Planted: October 7, 2011 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: May 30, 2012 Tillage: Disk TwicePopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SGReplications: Two (averaged) Insecticide: Escalate® & 1.24 oz. Warrior


BECK’S Wheat Nitrogen Timing & Inhibitor Study - 2012

Purpose: Due to the likelihood of soils being waterlogged in the late spring, many growers prefer to make a one pass nitrogen application while fields are frozen, often at the Feekes 3 growth stage. Nitrogen inhibitors are often recommended to minimize the risk of nitrogen loss as saturated soils begin to warm in the early spring. This study takes a look at the timing of nitrogen applications and the use of nitrogen inhibitors to protect a farmer's nitrogen investment in wheat. Each entry had a total of 100 lbs. of nitrogen applied as a single application or as split applications. Nitrogen forms evaluated in this study include 28% UAN solution both with and without Agrotain® Plus, urea, SuperUTM (urea with Agrotain Plus) and ESN®. Agrotain Plus contains both a urease inhibitor to minimize volatilization and a nitrification inhibitor. ESN is a polymer coated urea that results in a slow release of liquified urea as soil temperatures warm in the spring.

Nitrogen Form Rate TimingDry TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet

Income^28% UAN 40 lbs. / 60 lbs. Feekes 3 / Feekes 5 61.4 17.7 95.1 $544.5228% UAN 100 lbs. Feekes 3 60.7 18.0 93.3 $538.48

28% UAN w/ Agrotain Plus 100 lbs. Feekes 3 61.7 17.6 97.7 $556.70

Urea 40 lbs. / 60 lbs. Feekes 3 / Feekes 5 62.2 17.2 96.3 $559.64Urea 100 lbs. Feekes 3 61.5 16.4 94.3 $552.07

Super U 100 lbs. Feekes 3 61.2 16.5 98.0 $563.90ESN 100 lbs. Feekes 3 61.2 15.4 96.4 $549.23

Agrotain Plus - 3 Year Summary


PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet

Income^28% UAN Split Feekes 3 / Feekes 5 61.3 17.4 82.8 $463.2128% UAN 100% Feekes 3 60.9 17.4 81.0 $456.95

28% UAN w/ Agrotain Plus 100% Feekes 3 61.4 17.0 84.3 $467.99

Nitrogen Form & Timing - 4 Year Summary


PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet

Income^28% UAN Split Feekes 3 / Feekes 5 59.0 15.6 80.5 $448.1028% UAN 100% Feekes 3 58.3 15.9 78.3 $439.00

Urea 100% Feekes 3 59.3 15.4 82.0 $471.12Urea Split Feekes 3 / Feekes 5 59.4 15.6 82.8 $470.66ESN 100% Feekes 3 59.3 15.0 83.7 $465.25

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. ^Net Income calculated using $6.60 price for wheat minus the cost of nitrogen including application charge for each application and inhibitor.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Harmony is a registered trademark of DuPont. Warrior is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company. Agrotain is a registered trademark of IMC Phosphates Company and is licensed exclusively to AGROTAIN International LLC. SuperU is a trademark of AGROTAIN International LLC. ESN is a registered trademark of Agrium, Inc.

251


Summary: UAN Applications A single application of 28% UAN solution treated with Agrotain Plus provided the highest yield and net return in the UAN portion of this year's testing with a 4.4 Bu./A. advantage over a single application with no inhibitor. The three year summary shows a 3.3 Bu./A. advantage. Split applications of UAN applied at Feekes 3 and Feekes 5 produced a 1.8 Bu./A. advantage over the single application without an inhibitor applied at Feekes 3. This same advantage is also seen in the three year summary while the four year summary shows a 2.2 Bu./A. advantage in favor of split applications. Urea Applications The 2012 yield data shows strong support for using split applications of urea or nitrogen inhibitors to achieve higher yields. The split application of urea applied at both the Feekes 3 and Feekes 5 growth stages outyielded the single application of urea at Feekes 3 by 2 Bu./A. and added $7.57 additional profit per acre. However, the four year summary only shows a yield advantage of 0.8 Bu./A. The use of SuperU provided this year's highest yields with an advantage of 3.7 Bu./A. over the single application of urea and added an additional $11.83/A. in profits. The single application of ESN provided a 2.2 Bu./A. yield advantage over the single application of urea. However, the additional cost of this product resulted in a slight loss in profits. The four year summary shows a similar trend with a 1.7 Bu./A. increase resulting in a profit loss of $5.41/A.

BECK’S Wheat Nitrogen Timing & Inhibitor Study - Continued

252


Planted: October , 2011 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: June 4, 2012 Tillage: Disk TwicePopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SGReplications: Two (averaged) Insecticide: Escalate® & 1.24 oz. Warrior

Product Tested: BECK 113 & BECK 135

BECK’S Wheat Nitrogen Rate Study - 2012

Purpose: This study is designed to help us find the economic optimum nitrogen rate (EONR), which is the rate of nitrogen that maximizes profitability. Although the study was originally based on the format used by both Purdue University and the University of Illinois for corn, we have adapted the same format for answering this question in wheat. Two varieties were used to determine if there are potential differences in EONR between genetic families. All entries received 13.4 gallons of 28% UAN solution (40 lbs. N./A.) at the Feekes 3 growth stage followed by a second application of 28% UAN at the Feekes 5 stage to meet the total amount of N for each treatment.

BECK 113 BECK 135 2 variety Average

Lbs. ofNitrogen

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

ReturnLbs. of

NitrogenPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

ReturnLbs. of

NitrogenPercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreNet^

Return

40 15.7 79.3 $494.57 40 17.9 86.1 $539.43 40 16.8 82.7 $517.00

60 15.4 88.8 $542.73 60 18.4 95.9 $589.48 60 16.9 92.3 $566.11

80 15.2 90.9 $542.03 80 18.5 102.6 $619.52 80 16.8 96.7 $580.77

100 15.7 91.6 $532.68 100 19.3 104.9 $620.22 100 17.5 98.3 $576.45

120 15.5 93.2 $528.59 120 18.7 111.2 $647.47 120 17.1 102.2 $588.03

140 15.9 87.2 $474.93 140 18.7 109.7 $622.95 140 17.3 98.4 $548.94

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. *Net return calculated using $6.60/Bu. price for wheat less cost of nitrogen each application. Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc.Harmony is a registered trademark of DuPont. Warrior is a registered trademark of Syngenta Group Company.

Summary: The results from this year's study show that on average, 120 lbs. of applied nitrogen per acre was the economic optimum nitrogen rate. This is very close to the recommended 1.2 lbs. of N per bushel of yield ration that is recommended by the University of Kentucky Wheat Science Group. The individual results for BECK 135 followed this trend producing both its highest yield and profitability at 120 lbs. N. per acre. Similarly, BECK 113 produced its highest yield at 120 lbs. N/A.; however, the yield increase compared to lower rates is small enough that profitability was highest at 60 lbs. N/A.

253


Planted: October 7, 2011 Previous Crop: CornHarvested: Various Tillage: Disk TwicePopulation: 1.5 million seeds/A. Herbicide: 0.9 oz. Harmony Extra SGReplications: Three (averaged) Insecticide: Escalate® & 1.24 oz. Warrior


BECK’S Wheat Fungicide Study - 2012

Purpose: This study was established to determine the return on investment from the use of foliar fungicides in wheat. Fungicides were applied at various growth stages to target both foliar and head diseases. Foliar diseases that are most commonly seen at the Southern IN PFR farm include both Septoria and Stagonospora leaf blotch. The most common head diseases would include Fusarium Head Scab and Glume Blotch.

Wheat Fungicide Study - 2012

Treatment TimingDry TestWeight

PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per Acre ROI ^13.5 oz. Caramba® Flowering 62.8 19.4 110.5 $8.13Untreated Flowering 62.4 19.6 105.3 ----3 oz. Headline® f/b13.5 oz. Caramba

w/ Harmony Flowering 62.2 20.1 108.6 -$14.62

Wheat Fungicide Study - 4 Year Summary


PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreROI^

$7.00/Bu.ROI^

$5.50/Bu.ROI^

$4.00/Bu.13.5 oz. Caramba Flowering 59.6 17.5 89.8 $15.45 $6.55 -$2.34Untreated ---- 59.4 16.9 83.9 ---- ---- ----

†Bushels per acre corrected to 13% moisture. ^Return on investment calculated using $6.60 price for wheat minus cost of product and a $5.50 application fee.Escalate is a registered trademark of Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. Headline is a registered trademark of DuPont. Warrior is a registered trademark of a Syngenta Group Company.

Summary: This spring provided unusually hot and dry conditions during the grain fill period for wheat. Due to this, very little head scab pressure could be found in any of the wheat at the Southern Indiana PFR farm. A light infestation of leaf rust was noted late in the season. Even with such light disease pressure, an application of Caramba at flowering provided a yield increase of 5.2 Bu./A. resulting in a profit of $8.13/A. This is close to the four year average increase of 5.9 Bu./A. Based on this four year average yield gain, additional profits could be obtained by spraying Caramba at flowering with market prices down to approximately $4.04/Bu. Data collected over the past two years show that a multi-pass program consisting of 3 oz. of Headline sprayed with Harmony followed by 13.5 oz. of Caramba at flowering also provided a yield increase over the control, but is unlikely to provide additional profitability over the single application of Caramba at high market prices.

Wheat Fungicide Study - 2 Year Summary


PercentMoisture

Bushels†

Per AcreROI^

$7.00/Bu.ROI^

$5.50/Bu.ROI^

$4.00/Bu.13.5 oz. Caramba Flowering 62.2 20.1 103.4 $12.16 $9.70 $0.43Untreated ---- 61.7 19.3 98.0 ---- ---- ----3 oz. Headline® f/b13.5 oz. Caramba

w/ Harmony Flowering 61.8 20.5 103.6 $2.97 -$5.47 -$13.91

TO SUCCESS.ACCESSORY

TO SUCCESS.ACCESSORY

√ = Control S = Suppression / Intermediate Protection (Partial protection depending on the development stage of the plant when insects infest the plant.)

Export Approval Notice*Although fully approved in the United States, Canada and Japan, grain and certain grain by-products from THESE HYBRIDS MAY NOT BE APPROVED for all markets. Customers are advised to discuss trait acceptance policies with their local grain handler prior to delivering grain containing biotech traits. **Monsanto Company is a member of Excellence Through Stewardship® (ETS). Monsanto products are commercialized in accordance with ETS Product Launch Stewardship Guidance, and in compliance with Monsanto’s Policy for Commercialization of Biotechnology-Derived Plant Products in Commodity Crops. This product has been approved for import into key export markets with functioning regulatory systems. Any crop or material produced from this product can only be exported to, or used, processed or sold in countries where all necessary regulatory approvals have been granted. It is a violation of national and international law to move material containing biotech traits across boundaries into nations where import is not permitted. Growers should talk to their grain handler or product purchaser to confirm their buying position for this product. Excellence Through Stewardship® is a registered trademark of Biotechnology Industry Organization. B.t. products may not yet be registered in all states. Check with your seed representative for the registration status in your state.ALWAYS READ AND FOLLOW PESTICIDE LABEL DIRECTIONS. Roundup Ready® crops contain genes that confer tolerance to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup® brand agricultural herbicides. Roundup® brand agricultural herbicides will kill crops that are not tolerant to glyphosate. Roundup PowerMAX®, Roundup Ready 2 Technology and Design®, Roundup Ready®, Roundup®, ®YieldGard, the YieldGard Corn Borer Design , YieldGard VT Rootworm/RR2®, YieldGard VT Triple®, and YieldGard VT® are registered trademarks of Monsanto Technology LLC. Respect the Refuge and Corn Design® and Respect the Refuge® are registered trademarks of National Corn Growers Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Liberty®, LibertyLink®, the Water Droplet logo, and PONCHO are registered trademarks of Bayer. Liberty is not registered in all states. Herculex® Insect Protection technology by Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Pioneer. ®Herculex and the Herculex Shield Logo are registered trademarks of Dow AgroSciences LLC. Optimum® AcreMax® insect protection system available through the XL® brand. XL®, Optimum® and AcreMax® are trademarks of Pioneer. XL® is distributed by Beck’s Hybrids. Herculex®I, Herculex®RW and Herculex®XTRA trait products’ availability are subject to re-registration by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Roundup Ready® is a registered trademark used under license from Monsanto Company. Agrisure® and Agrisure Viptera® are trademarks or registered trademarks of a Syngenta Group Company. For more information, visit www.agrisuretraits.com.

Trademark StatementBayer CropScience LP, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Always read and follow label instructions. Bayer, the Bayer Cross, Ignite, LibertyLink and the Water Droplet Design are registered trademarks of Bayer. Liberty is not registered in all states. For additional product information call toll-free 1-866-99-BAYER (1-866-992-2937) or visit our website at www.BayerCropScience.usSeed products with the LibertyLink® (LL) trait are resistant to the herbicide glufosinate ammonium, an alternative to glyphosate in corn, and combine high-yielding genetics with the powerful, non-selective, postemergent weed control of Liberty® herbicide for optimum yield and excellent weed control.

LibertyLink Patent StatementSoybean seeds containing the LibertyLink® trait are protected under multiple United States patents and may be planted only to produce one (1) commercial crop and only after signing a Grower Trait License agreement. It is illegal to save or catch soybean seeds containing the LibertyLink trait for use as planting seed or for transfer to others for use as planting seed.

In-Plant Insect Protection (Not including seed treatments)Herbicide Tolerance

• ECB = European Corn Borer• CRW = Protection Against: Western Corn Rootworm Northern Corn Rootworm Mexican Corn Rootworm• BCW = Black Cutworm

• WBC = Western Bean Cutworm• SWCB = Southwestern Corn Borer• FAW = Fall Armyworm• SB = Stalk Borer• CEW = Corn Earworm• DCW = Dingy Cutworm

Technology LogosBeck’s

DescriptorExportNotice Glyphosate Liberty ECB CRW BCW WBC SWCB FAW SB CEW DCW

Roundup Ready® Corn 2 RR ** √

LibertyLink® LL * √

Agrisure® GT RR * √

YieldGard VT Triple® vT3 ** √ √ √ √ S S S

YieldGard® VT Rootworm/RR2® vT ** √ √

Agrisure® CB/LL Bt1 * √ √ √ S S S

Agrisure® CB/LL/RR BR * √ √ √ √ S S S

Herculex®I Insect Protection Hx1 * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ S

Agrisure® 3000GT A3 * √ √ √ √ √ S S S

Herculex® XTRA Insect Protection w/ Roundup Ready® Corn 2 HXR * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ S

Herculex®I Insect Protectionw/ Roundup Ready® Corn 2 HR * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ S

Optimum® AcreMax® insect protection AM * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ S

Optimum® AcreMax® Xtra insect protection AMX * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ S

Agrisure Viptera® 3111 A4 * √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Chart revised November 2012

Phoenix™Agrisure®, Agrisure Viptera™ and Phoenix™ are trademarks of a Syngenta Group Company.

*XL® brand seed is distributed by Beck’s Superior Hybrids, Inc. XL®, Optimum®, AcreMax® and AQUAmax™ are registered trademarks of Dupont Pioneer.

Documents

Welcome to the 2012 Practical Farm Research results publication