Upload
trankhuong
View
230
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Annual Insurance Seminar: Program
Welcome by Craig Woolley
The rocky regulation road: An update
Sandile Khoza
How can we sleep when our beds are burning? Some aspects of fire insurance claims
Craig Woolley
Construction Project Liability Policies: Making them work in practice.
Ane Potgieter and Clinton Slogrove
Tea Break
International insurance trends: lessons from Norton Rose Fulbright offices around the world
James Bateson
Failure of investments to perform: The broker’s liability
Deniro Pillay
All in a flap over Freight Forwarder’s Liability
Andrew Robinson
Q & A: Thanks and closing
Maria Philippides
Cocktail Party
Introduction
• SA as IAIS member following European regulators
– increased supervision, focus on solvency, governance, consumer protection & risk management
• More sophisticated & knowledgeable consumers
• In line with global consumer awareness trends
• Compliance costs on the increase, as degree & scope of regulation has intensified
• New legislation demanding more reporting with shorter timelines
Since previous update
• OSTI introduced appeal mechanism
• Commencement of certain sections of PoPI Act
• Treating Customers Fairly incrementally “rolled out”
Ombudsman Appeal mechanism
• Introduced for final rulings issued by OSTI (1 Dec 2013)
• Leave to appeal to be granted by OSTI - 30 days to appeal
• Parties may be represented at own cost
• Appeal Tribunal ruling final for OSTI proceedings
• Consumer appellant may further pursue matter in court
• Insurer appellant may still review OSTI or Appeal Tribunal ruling in court
• “Second bite at the cherry” for insurers in ombud forum
OSTI
• OSTI resolved claims worth R119m in favour of consumers during 2013 (2012: R114m)
• OSTI was quoted as saying:
“The increase in the number of complaints may be because there was an increase in claims registered due to bad weather conditions over the past year and the growing awareness of consumers of their contractual rights”.
Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)
• TCF Roadmap suggested 1 January 2014 effective date for TCF enforcement
• FSB adopting incremental approach to implementing TCF
• No single "launch date" planned for formal TCF implementation
• TCF principles in future new over-arching legislation
• Turning regulation to supervision
Protection of Personal Information Act (PoPI)
• Certain sections & parts of PoPI Act commenced on 11 April 2014
• Fine or 12 months imprisonment for minor breach
• Major breaches will attract bigger fine or 10 years imprisonment
• Data security breach costs may include:
– identifying & repairing security compromises
–communicating with affected customers
–‘man hours’ spent managing process before the Regulator, and
–cost of reputational damage control
• International insurer fined in UK for breach in SA
Looking ahead
• Insurance Laws Amendment Bill, 2013
• Solvency Assessment Management (SAM)
• Financial Sector Regulation Bill (“Twin Peaks Bill”)
Insurance Laws Amendment Bill 2013
• Withdrawn by Minister before it lapsed
• Purposes of proposed amendments:
– introduce insurance group supervision pending broader review of insurance laws & SAM;
– strengthen governance, risk management & insurers’ internal controls;
– align SA’s adherence to international regulatory principles & insurance standards
• Alternative interim measures for ILAB,2013
Solvency Assessment Management (SAM)
• From 1 January 2016 insurers required to report to FSB in accordance with Solvency Assessment Management (SAM)
• Primary purposes of SAM to:
–protect policyholders;
–align SA insurance industry standards to international insurers & reinsurers
Financial Sector Regulation Bill (Twin Peaks)
• Will introduce Financial Services Ombud Schemes Council
• Council will oversee all voluntary ombud schemes
• This being an additional level of bureaucracy
• Too many laws with too few experienced & properly financed public resources to enforce them
Conclusion
• There is a new approach that is consumer-centric (Treating Customers
Fairly)
• Now insurer, not the underwriting manager or broker primarily
responsible for consumer satisfaction
• Challenge of under-skilled & under-staffed regulators, so they rely on
insurers to police intermediaries
• Result favours big players as outsourcing requires close monitoring
• Proper free choice is insisted upon & POPI will change marketing
Conclusion
• Regulators to allow insurance product innovation & not regulation that disrupts creativity
• Complying with regulation can provide opportunities:
–Competitive advantage as regulations may drive other smaller industry players out of business or reduce market share.
–Product innovation.
–Attract foreign investment as the organization's regulatory compliance will be more in line with international standards.
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
How can we sleep while our beds are burning?
Craig Woolley
Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa
2 October 2014
R60 million GEIS fraud
Charged but trial not
finalised
Aboo not a member of
close corporation
Non-Disclosure
Authority for
requirement to disclose
charges
March Cabaret Club & Casino Ltd vs The London
Assurance
R2 million loaned to close corporation
Written statement signed by member
Key personnel on insurance policy
Evidence of insurance broker
Who was the directing mind?
“The interests of the mortgagee have priority over the insured’s interests, but are limited to the outstanding amount of the bond. These interests will not be invalidated by any act or omission of the mortgagor or owner of the insured buildings, provided that the act or omission takes place without the knowledge of the mortgagee”
Mortgagee Clause
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
Construction Project Liability Policies
Making them Work in Practice
Clinton Slogrove and Ané Potgieter
Associates
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa
2 October 2014
• The general concept of a PLP
• Pre-contractual phase: one chance to get it right!
• Why choose a PLP
• PLP wordings – some special features
– of cross-liability clauses
– Xtrata Coal South Africa v Sandvik Mining and 7 others
• Handling claims made under a PLP
• Conclusion
Outline
• Single project
• Owner controlled – contractor controlled
• Combined CAR-PL-PI
General introduction
• Multi-Phase Contracts
• Liabilities flow from the contract terms
• The policy is designed around the contract
• Standard form contracts with particular conditions
• Know the risks associated with the project
Pre-contractual phase
• A competent and experienced broker
– Knows the Standard form contracts
– Assists drafting Particular Conditions relating to insurance
– Most onerous responsibility of all parties
• An informed and resourced client
– Provide the details requested by Broker
– Provide Broker with access to contractors and consultants
• An experienced and informed underwriter
– Specialised underwriting staff to assess risk
– Size and technical complexity of the project matched by appropriate underwriting resources
What is needed to make the PLP wording work…
Variable factors influencing cost
• Size of the insured
• Size of the projects
• Nature of the work and geographic spread
• Claims experience
• General market experience
• Individual cost v collective cost
Cost
Multiple contractor base exposes owner to
• Failure through non-payment
• Exhaustion of aggregate
Volatility
• Definition of “the insured”
• Description of project and period of insurance
• Cross-liability wordings generally
Project policy wordings – some special features
• Independence of each “sole” insured
• Claims and counterclaims between co-insured parties
• Independent legal representation
• Independent claims handling
• Contractual limitations of liability
• Bridging the gap between contractual limitations and coverage provisions
Cross-liabilities
Employer (Plaintiff)
EPCM Contractor (1st Defendant) Contractor
Xtrata Coal South Africa v Sandvik Mining & 7 others
Project PI
Insurer (3rd Defendant)
• Conflicting interests between insured parties
• Independent advice
• Independent claims handling at all levels
• Confidentiality and privilege
• Assumption of claims control
Handling claims
• Loss adjusters and legal advisors
• Experienced loss adjuster
• Preservation of rights of both parties
• Preserving evidence
• Seeking legal advice maintaining independence
Handling claims
• PLP’s are highly complicated liability insurance contracts
• Multiple parties can give rise to complex claims
• Properly worded PLP based upon project contracts is
essential
• Knowledgeable and experienced brokers, underwriters,
insured parties, professional advisers necessary
• Communication between all parties essential
• Working group for all parties for major projects?
Conclusion
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal
entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself
provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No
individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has
any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law
discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
International insurance trends: Lessons
from around the world
James Bateson
Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
2 October 2014
Anyone who thinks the ANC is going to run South Africa is living in cloud cuckoo land
Margaret Thatcher, 1978
Senator Obama cannot possibly believe he can be elected US President next year
Christopher Hitchens, 19 September 2007
Overall risks to the outlook seem less threatening than six months ago
IMF, World Economic Outlook, 2007
Did you know?
• Over 2.4 billion people use the Internet
• Around 140 million in Africa
• Africa is the fastest growing mobile network market in the world (50% growth per year since 2002)
• 50 billion devices will be connected to the Internet by 2020
• There are 100 billion searches on Google every month
• Every minute, 24 hours of video is uploaded to YouTube
Interconnectivity
‘Big Businesses’: Geographical Shift (McKinsey)
Source: McKinsey Global Institute, Urban World: The shifting global business landscape, October 2013
‘Big Business’ defined by McKinsey as a business with revenues exceeding US$ 1bn
Now:
8,000 ‘big businesses’ exceeding $1bn revenue
$57trn in combined revenue (equivalent to 90% global GDP)
73% in developed world
In 2025:
15,000 exceeding $1bn revenue
$130trn in combined revenue
45% in developing world
Location of Fortune 500
How will this affect insurance?
733.4 770.0
925.0
1 185.7
42.2 69.2
136.6
386.8
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2008 2013 (e) 2018 (f) 2025 (f)
US
$ B
illio
n
Non-Life Premium Growth For Target Markets (excl. Motor and Accident & Health)
Developed Markets Developing Markets
As companies are increasingly operating across borders, supply chains are becoming more global and complex. The risks companies are facing are not only multiplying but becoming increasingly interdependent.
Events on one side of the globe can impact operations on the other; be that a natural catastrophe or a cyber-attack.
Risk managers face a set of challenges presented by the intensification and rising interdependence of risks and speed of change of business in the global economy.
Jason Harris, Chief Executive, International Property and Casualty, XL Group
• Technology products – cyber, data protection
• Regulation and Investigations/D&O exposure
• Political risks
• Mergers and Acquisitions insurance
• Natural catastrophes
The “Big Five”:
• Background – historically an uninsured risk?
• The global cost of cyber crime
– Between USD100 billion to 500 billion per year
– 823 million exposed records
– Largest single incident – 152 million records
• The market / opportunities
– The US market - USD1.3 billion of premiums in 2013
• Legal issues – the EU and US perspectives
• Market predictions
• “Big data”
Cyber liability
Number of cyber claims worldwide by industry in 2013
29.3%
15%
12.8% 10.7%
7.9% 7.1% 6.4%
2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.1%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Perc
en
tag
e
Industry
Healthcare
Financial Services
Retail
Professional Services
Technology
Education
Non-profit
Entertainment
Other/unknown
Hospitality
Telecommunication
Cyber liability
• Background – historically an uninsured risk?
• The global cost of cyber crime
– Between USD100 billion to 500 billion per year
– 823 million exposed records
– Largest single incident – 152 million records
• The market / opportunities
– The US market - USD1.3 billion of premiums in 2013
• Legal issues – the EU and US perspectives
• Market predictions
• “Big data”
• Insurance regulation is becoming generally more intrusive and complex
– Solvency II – The enhanced role of the International Association of Insurance
Supervisors
– Globally Systemic Important Insurers
• There has though been a change in emphasis; from a focus on prudential measures towards consumer protection measures
Regulatory driven claims – changing environment
Investigations
• Background
– Invasive cross border regulation
– Increasing personal accountability
– Scrutiny of management teams
• Impact on D&O insurers – claims trends
• Investigations by regulators
Political Risks
• Unrest will increase as the “losers” of globalisation react
• Types of cover
• The issue is not the unrest but the location of infrastructure and assets
Mergers and Acquisitions
• Background - growing global popularity linked to recovery in M&A activity
• Cover provided
• Product applications
• The market around the world
– In North America (1998-2013) – claim frequency of 28% of policies written
– In EMEA and APAC (2002-13) – claim frequency of 12% of the policies written
2012 Global Overview: Regional breakdown of
frequency of claims
0 20 40 60 80 100
North America
EMEA
APAC
Number of Breaches
Number of Claims
Number of Policies
2012 Global Overview: Claims Made by Country
40%
3%26%
3%
3%
13%
6% 6% North America
United Kingdom
Australia
Asia-Pacific
France
Spain
Sweden
New Zealand
2012 Global Overview: Claims by Industry Sector
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Agricultu
re
Commoditie
s
Consumer G
oods
Energy
Financial S
ervices
Healthca
re a
nd Pharm
aceutic
als
Constructi
on/Real E
state
Technology
Telecoms
Other
Manufactu
ring
• Natural disasters – impact of climate change
• Pandemics
–Definition
–Classes of business affected
–Secondary impacts
• Product integration
Natural Catastrophes
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
ENERGY
INFRASTRUCTURE, MINING AND COMMODITIES
TRANSPORT
TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
PHARMACEUTICALS AND LIFE SCIENCES
Failure of investments to perform: the
broker's liability – case study
Deniro Pillay
Director
Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa
2 October 2014
If its “too good to be true”, it probably is “too good to be
true!”
If its “too good to be true”, it probably is “too good to be true!”
Facts
• Broker: short and long term investment advice
• Investments with insurance companies and financial services companies
• Faced claims by 26 former clients totalling R3.7 million: negligent
investment advice
• Edwafin: unlisted public company and registered FSP
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Facts
• Edwafin: offered debentures – 63 months locked capital investment
• Return of 15% to 20% p.a.
• Higher commission: 4%
• Basis of broker’s investment advice
• Failed to obtain Edwafin’s audited financial statements or prospectus
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Facts
• Between August 2006 and September 2008: advised clients to invest
• Between August 2006 and October 2008: Edwafin met investor
obligations
• First problem with payment arose in October 2008
• Edwafin liquidated by investor, unopposed, on 22 May 2009
• Investigation by Scorpions: allegation of pyramid scheme
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Issue of negligence
• Broker insured for: any legal liability arising from claims made against him
for the breach of duty in connection with the business by reason of any
negligent act, error or omission committed in the conduct of the
business by the broker.
• Definition of business included dealing in unlisted securities
• Exclusion Clause: any claim made against the broker arising from or
contributed to by depreciation (or failure to appreciate) in value of any
investments, including securities.
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Issue of negligence
• Durr v ABSA Bank (SCA – 1997)
– Durr advised to invest in secured debentures and preferent shares
– Broker failed to request audited financial statements or prospectus
– Debentures factually unsecured and preferent shares allocated irregularly
– Court’s decision: broker would be negligent if he engaged voluntarily in any
potentially dangerous activity unless he had the skill and knowledge usually
associated with the proper discharge of the duties connected with such
activity.
– Broker found to have acted negligently
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case
study
Issue of negligence
• Broker was negligent as he failed to:
– Obtain and consider Edwafin’s prospectus
– Obtain and consider Edwafin’s audited financial statements
– Consider risks associated with investing in an unlisted public company
– Perform a proper risk-assessment and needs analysis for each client
– Investigate Edwafin’s claim: capital investment guaranteed by fidelity
guarantee
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Applicable Exclusion Clause
• Broker not indemnified against any claim made against the broker arising
from activities which were not authorised by his FSB licence
• Broker only licenced to sell long-term insurance products
• Edwafin licenced to sell debentures and securitised debt
• Broker appointed by Edwafin as its authorised representative to sell
debentures
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Lessons to be learnt
• Be aware of risks associated with unlisted public companies
• If it is “too good to be true” it probably is “too good to be true!”
• Perform a proper Investigation into financial position of the proposed company
• Perform a proper risk-assessment and needs analysis for each client
• Be aware of the terms of your professional indemnity policy
Failure of investments to perform: the broker's liability – case study
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal
entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself
provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No
individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has
any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law
discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
All in a flap about freight forwarders’ liability insurance
Andrew Robinson
Norton Rose Fulbright
2 October 2014
Stock
Throughput
Liability
Insurance
Transport
Brokers Bailee
Insurance
TRANSPORT
INSURANCE
Cargo Insurance
[GIT]
Hull and
Machinery
Insurance
Air Carriers Road
Carriers
Sea Carriers Clearing & Forwarding
FREIGHT
FORWARDERS
Principals Agents Warehousemen
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal
entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself
provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No
individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has
any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law
discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.
Disclaimer Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright Australia, Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP, Norton Rose Fulbright South Africa (incorporated as Deneys Reitz Inc) and Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, each of which is a separate legal entity, are members (“the Norton Rose Fulbright members”) of Norton Rose Fulbright Verein, a Swiss Verein. Norton Rose Fulbright Verein helps coordinate the activities of the Norton Rose Fulbright members but does not itself provide legal services to clients.
References to “Norton Rose Fulbright”, “the law firm”, and “legal practice” are to one or more of the Norton Rose Fulbright members or to one of their respective affiliates (together “Norton Rose Fulbright entity/entities”). No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder, director, employee or consultant of, in or to any Norton Rose Fulbright entity (whether or not such individual is described as a “partner”) accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this communication. Any reference to a partner or director is to a member, employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications of the relevant Norton Rose Fulbright entity.
The purpose of this communication is to provide information as to developments in the law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute an opinion of any Norton Rose Fulbright entity on the points of law discussed. You must take specific legal advice on any particular matter which concerns you. If you require any advice or further information, please speak to your usual contact at Norton Rose Fulbright.