Upload
flnr
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Weekly Column From Leader Brian Kolb, Court Ruling on Cigarette Taxes, May 13, 2011
1/2
For Release: IMMEDIATELY, May 13, 2011
Contact: Doug Finch (315) 781-2030
FEDERAL APPEALS COURT RULING BRINGS NEW YORK ONE STEP
CLOSER TO ENFORCING THE LAW AND COLLECTING THE TAXLegislative column from Assembly Minority Leader Brian M. Kolb(R,I,C-Canandaigua)
Right here in our Finger Lakes community and all across western, central and upstate New
York taxpayers and businesses have been waging a fierce battle. At stake in this battle arefundamental principles such as the rule of law and basic fairness for all, not just a select few.
Also at stake, is the economic future of countless small businesses that continue following the
law, even though their bottom line suffers for doing so. I am proud to be part of a growing, non-partisan coalition of taxpayers and businesses waging this battle to enforce the law, collect the
taxes, and level the economic playing field through collecting sales taxes on cigarettes and
gasoline sold on Native American lands to non-Native American Indians.
A FIGHT WORTH FIGHTING: ENFORCE THE LAW, COLLECT THE TAXES AND
LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD
This fight has been occurring for nearly two decades and, regrettably, has claimed the dreamsand futures of countless local mom-and-pop convenience store operators whose only crime
was following the law and trying to compete on an unfair playing field. This fight has beenespecially costly: it has cost our local taxpayers, local governments and state government
literally billions in legal fees, lost revenue, closed or bankrupted businesses, and a series of
expensive court fights that seem to go on and on with no end in sight. However, earlier thisweek, with the announcement of a ruling by the Federal Court of Appeals, it appeared as if the
battle was over and the rule of law had finally won the day.
FEDERAL COURT: NEW YORK CAN BEGIN COLLECTING TAXES ON
CIGARETTES AND GASOLINE
On Monday, May 9, 2011, the Second Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals threw out an
injunction that had prevented the collection of taxes on cigarettes sold on Native American
Lands to non-Native American Indians. The ruling was a HUGE victory and a major triumph for
law-abiding, taxpaying citizens and businesses. This issue is personal to me: I have spoken with,and heard from, thousands of area residents who believe, as I do, that state government should
have begun enforcing the law, collecting the taxes and leveling the playing field 17 years ago. It
was back in 1994 that the United States Supreme Court ruled New York had the authority tocollect these taxes. Yet, for 17 years, state government inexplicably sat on its hands.
-MORE-
8/6/2019 Weekly Column From Leader Brian Kolb, Court Ruling on Cigarette Taxes, May 13, 2011
2/2
KOLB WEEKLY COLUMN PAGE 2
05.13.2011
NO PERSON OR GROUP IS ABOVE THE LAW
The Judges on the Second Circuit are correct no person or group is above the law. The Courts
verdict mirrored what I have been saying all along, that the Native American claims have no
merit. The Court dismissed the tribal arguments based on a few key facts and legal principles.
First, collecting these taxes does not impose an economic burden on tribal retailers. Second, thesystem of collection does not interfere with their rights of self-government. Third, while federal
law prohibits New York from taxing cigarette sales to members of the tribe, the state can tax
cigarettes sold to non-Native Americans. On all counts, the Federal Court got it right.
MORE LEGAL GAMES: JUDGE SIWEK THROWS UPANOTHER ROADBLOCK
Unfortunately, there is another twist to this story. The day after the Federal Court of Appeals
ruled New York could finally move forward, the Seneca Indian Nation sought to stall the ruling
through a temporary restraining order. At the heart of the Nations argument is their claim abaseless one, in my opinion that the State Department of Taxation and Finance moved forward
with issuing regulations to collect the taxes without proper public input. Keep in mind, not asingle penny of sales taxes had even been collected! Yet, for some reason, State Supreme CourtJudge Donna Siwek decided this was a sound argument, even though the United States Supreme
Court and the Federal Court of Appeals both ruled that taxes could be collected on sales to non-
Native Americans Indians on Native American lands. Add to this the fact that locally, we haveheld countless public hearings, solicited pages of testimony, circulated petitions, held press
conferences and asked New Yorks Congressional delegation for an end to this legal runaround.
Personally, I have spoken to former Governor David Paterson and current Governor Andrew
Cuomo on this issue, and sponsored legislation, Assembly Bill A.10128, that directed all
cigarette wholesalers to sell only tax-stamped cigarettes to everyone, unless presented with anIndian tax exemption coupon to allow for the collection of the billions in lost revenue. This bill
was introduced properly, following every necessary legal and legislative requirement.
LEGISLATING FROM THE BENCH MUST STOP!
While nobody knows how Judge Siwek will ultimately rule when she hears this case on June 1,the fact that the Seneca Indian Nation continues treating our legal system like some sort of game
is troubling. The Seneca Nations last-minute legal gambit is like a football team trying to run
out the clock even though they are losing 35 to nothing. It just doesnt make sense.
Frankly, Judge Siweks decision was one of the most shocking instances of legislating from the
bench that I have ever witnessed. The fact that Judge Siwek stopped the state from moving
forward even though the two highest courts in America have ruled in New Yorks favor, makeswe wonder whether the Judge is trying to interpretthe lawormake the law. This is a critical
distinction! If Judge Siwek wants to make the laws, then she should run for the State Legislature
or Congress so she can serve in the legislative branch as opposed to thejudicialbranch.However, despite the Judges ruling, I believe we are close to finally seeing this issue resolved.
As always, constituents wishing to discuss this topic, or any other state-related matter shouldcontact my district office at (315) 781-2030, or e-mail me at [email protected]. You
can also follow me on Facebook and Twitter for the latest news and informational updates
regarding state government and our Assembly Minority Conference.-30-